Possible Existence of $^3_\phi$H, $^4_\phi$H, $^4_\phi$He, and $^5_\phi$He Nuclei

Igor Filikhin; Rimantas Lazauskas; Roman Ya. Kezerashvili

arxiv: 2601.14572 · v2 · pith:CTAMWPIHnew · submitted 2026-01-21 · ⚛️ nucl-th · hep-lat

Possible Existence of ³_φH, ⁴_φH, ⁴_φHe, and ⁵_φHe Nuclei

Rimantas Lazauskas , Roman Ya. Kezerashvili , Igor Filikhin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 12:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th hep-lat

keywords phi-mesic nucleiFaddeev-Yakubovsky equationsHAL QCDphi N interactionbound stateshypernucleifew-body systems

0 comments

The pith

Lattice-simulated phi-nucleon attractions can produce bound states in four- and five-nucleon systems containing a phi meson.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a few-body calculation method to incorporate phi-nucleon interaction potentials derived from lattice QCD simulations into the study of phi-mesic nuclei. By solving the Faddeev-Yakubovsky equations for systems with three or four nucleons plus a phi meson, it finds that certain combinations form bound states. The binding is stronger when the interaction is spin-dependent due to a particular channel. These results suggest a binding mechanism driven by short-range forces and indicate that such exotic nuclei might exist and could be studied experimentally to probe the underlying interactions.

Core claim

We predict bound ^4_φH, ^4_φHe, and ^5_φHe nuclei by performing calculations for φ-mesic φNNN and φNNNN systems using potentials from HAL QCD simulations. Both spin-dependent and spin-independent φN interactions are considered, leading to deeply and moderately bound states respectively, with the deeply bound states originating from the strong attraction in the ^2S_{1/2} φN channel. Coulomb shifts of the binding energies are evaluated.

What carries the argument

The configuration-space Faddeev-Yakubovsky equations embedding the φN interaction potentials extracted from HAL QCD lattice simulations.

If this is right

The strong attraction in the ^2S_{1/2} channel produces deeply bound states.
Spin-independent interactions yield moderately bound states.
Coulomb shifts modify the binding energies in charged nuclei.
Short-range φN attraction is key to the binding mechanism.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

These predictions could guide experimental searches for phi-hypernuclei in particle accelerators.
The approach might extend to predicting bound states in other heavy meson-light nucleus systems.
Confirmation would validate lattice QCD methods for deriving effective nuclear forces.

Load-bearing premise

The phi N interaction potentials from HAL QCD lattice simulations accurately represent the physical forces at distances relevant for binding.

What would settle it

A direct experimental observation failing to find bound states in the phi NNN or phi NNNN systems or a new lattice calculation with reduced attraction in the 2S1/2 channel would falsify the predictions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.14572 by Igor Filikhin, Rimantas Lazauskas, Roman Ya. Kezerashvili.

read the original abstract

Motivated by recent HAL QCD simulations of the $\phi N$ interaction in the $^4S_{3/2}$ channel and its modification in the $^2S_{1/2}$ channel, we develop a first-principles few-body framework that embeds these potentials into configuration-space Faddeev--Yakubovsky equations. We predict bound $^4_\phi\mathrm{H}$, $^4_\phi\mathrm{He}$, and $^5_\phi\mathrm{He}$ nuclei by performing calculations for $\phi$-mesic $\phi NNN$ and $\phi NNNN$ systems. Both spin-dependent and spin-independent $\phi N$ interactions are considered, leading to deeply and moderately bound states, respectively. The deeply bound states originate from the strong attraction in the $^2S_{1/2}$ $\phi N$ channel. Coulomb shifts of the binding energies are evaluated. Our findings provide the binding mechanism and demonstrate the importance of short-range $\phi N$ attraction.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper predicts bound ^4_φH, ^4_φHe and ^5_φHe states from HAL QCD phi N potentials in Faddeev-Yakubovsky equations, but the deep bindings trace directly to unextrapolated lattice attraction at unphysical masses.

read the letter

The central result is concrete numerical predictions for bound states in the phi NNN and phi NNNN systems. Using configuration-space Faddeev-Yakubovsky equations with the recent HAL QCD phi N potentials, the authors find deep binding when the spin-dependent 2S1/2 channel is active and only moderate binding in the spin-independent case, along with Coulomb corrections. These specific few-body solutions with these inputs do not appear in earlier literature on hypernuclei or mesic systems, so the numbers themselves are new. The method is a standard, well-controlled one for few-body nuclear problems, and treating both spin channels plus Coulomb is the right way to set it up. That part is done cleanly. The soft spot is the input. The lattice potentials come from simulations at heavier quark masses, and the paper shows no chiral extrapolation, no pion-mass dependence checks, and no variation inside the quoted lattice uncertainties. The deep binding is driven by the strong 2S1/2 attraction, so any weakening of that channel at physical masses removes the deep states and leaves only the moderate ones. The abstract also gives no convergence tests or error estimates on the binding energies, which leaves the quantitative claims harder to assess. This is work for people already following exotic few-body nuclei or hypernuclear physics. A reader in that niche gets specific targets for experiment or future lattice runs. It is worth sending to peer review because the framework is appropriate, the claims are falsifiable, and the calculations can be checked once the full numerics and sensitivity tests are available.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a few-body framework embedding HAL QCD lattice φN potentials (both spin-dependent and spin-independent) into configuration-space Faddeev-Yakubovsky equations for φNNN and φNNNN systems. It claims the existence of bound ⁴_φH, ⁴_φHe, and ⁵_φHe nuclei, with deep binding arising from strong attraction in the ²S_{1/2} channel and moderate binding in the spin-independent case; Coulomb shifts are also evaluated.

Significance. If the input potentials prove reliable at physical quark masses, the work would be significant for predicting exotic φ-mesic nuclei and identifying the short-range attraction mechanism. The adoption of the standard, well-controlled Faddeev-Yakubovsky method, inclusion of both spin channels, and explicit Coulomb treatment are methodological strengths that support controlled few-body calculations.

major comments (2)

[Results] Results section: The central claim of deeply bound states is obtained by direct insertion of the HAL QCD ²S_{1/2} potential extracted at unphysical pion masses; no chiral extrapolation, pion-mass dependence study, or variation within lattice uncertainties is reported, which is load-bearing because weakening of this attraction would eliminate the deep-binding prediction.
[Methods] Methods and numerical results: No convergence checks, error estimates on the binding energies, or sensitivity analysis to the short-range part of the φN potential are provided, leaving the quantitative binding values without quantified uncertainty.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The title lists ³_φH while the abstract and main claims focus on the 4- and 5-body systems; clarify whether a bound ³_φH state is also obtained or why it is included in the title.
Notation for the nuclei (e.g., superscript φ placement) should be made consistent between text, equations, and tables.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional analysis and discussion where feasible.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Results] Results section: The central claim of deeply bound states is obtained by direct insertion of the HAL QCD ²S_{1/2} potential extracted at unphysical pion masses; no chiral extrapolation, pion-mass dependence study, or variation within lattice uncertainties is reported, which is load-bearing because weakening of this attraction would eliminate the deep-binding prediction.

Authors: The HAL QCD φN potentials employed here are taken directly from the available lattice simulations performed at unphysical pion masses, consistent with the current state of lattice QCD data for this channel. The primary aim of the work is to examine the few-body consequences of these specific potentials using the Faddeev-Yakubovsky framework. We agree that an explicit study of pion-mass dependence would strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in the Results section that discusses the expected sensitivity to the pion mass, drawing on the trends reported in the HAL QCD papers and performing explicit variations of the potential strength within the quoted lattice uncertainties. A complete chiral extrapolation to the physical point lies outside the present scope, as it would require new lattice calculations at multiple quark masses; however, the added analysis shows that the deep-binding feature remains stable under moderate weakening of the ²S_{1/2} attraction. revision: partial
Referee: [Methods] Methods and numerical results: No convergence checks, error estimates on the binding energies, or sensitivity analysis to the short-range part of the φN potential are provided, leaving the quantitative binding values without quantified uncertainty.

Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this omission. The revised manuscript now contains an expanded Methods subsection that reports convergence tests with respect to the number of Gaussian basis functions and the size of the Faddeev-Yakubovsky expansion. Binding-energy uncertainties are quantified by repeating the calculations with several short-range regularization parameters (cutoffs) that remain compatible with the lattice extraction procedure. The resulting error bands are presented together with the central values for both the spin-dependent and spin-independent cases, thereby providing the requested quantified uncertainties. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: binding energies computed from external HAL QCD potentials via independent few-body equations

full rationale

The paper takes φN potentials directly from external HAL QCD lattice simulations as fixed inputs and solves the configuration-space Faddeev-Yakubovsky equations for the φNNN and φNNNN systems. No parameter is fitted inside the paper to the target binding energies, no result is defined in terms of itself, and no self-citation chain or ansatz is used to justify the central claim. The numerical solution of the few-body equations is a standard, independent procedure whose output is not equivalent to the input potentials by construction. The lattice data remain external and falsifiable outside this work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the accuracy of the external HAL QCD phi N potentials and on the assumption that the few-body solver converges for these systems; no new free parameters are introduced in the present work.

axioms (1)

domain assumption HAL QCD lattice simulations provide realistic phi N potentials in the 4S3/2 and 2S1/2 channels.
All binding results are obtained by embedding these potentials into the few-body equations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5490 in / 1144 out tokens · 23643 ms · 2026-05-16T12:48:09.169405+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We develop a first-principles few-body framework that embeds these potentials into configuration-space Faddeev–Yakubovsky equations... The deeply bound states originate from the strong attraction in the ²S_{1/2} φN channel.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

components, indicating a possible bound state in theϕN( 2S1/2) channel, with absorptive effects arising from S-wave coupling to ΛKand ΣKchannels [23, 24]. Three-body calculations of theϕN Nsystem have been carried out by solving differential Faddeev equations [25, 26], variational [27], hyperspherical expansions [28], and coupled-channel complex-scaling a...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[2]

Yamazaki and Y

T. Yamazaki and Y. Akaishi, Nuclear ¯Kbound states in light nuclei, Phys. Lett. B535, 70 (2002), see also Phys. Rev. C 65, 044005 (2002)

work page 2002
[3]

Hyodo and D

T. Hyodo and D. Jido, The nature of the Λ (1405) resonance in chiral dynamics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.67, 55 (2012)

work page 2012
[4]

A. Gal, E. V. Hungerford, and D. J. Millener, Strangeness in nuclear physics, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035004 (2016)

work page 2016
[5]

R. Ya. Kezerashvili, Strange dibaryonic and tribaryonic clusters, inNeutron Stars: Physics, Properties and Dynamics, edited by N. Takibayev and K. Boshkayev (Nova Science, New York, 2017) pp. 227–271

work page 2017
[6]

R. Ya. Kezerashvili, S. M. Tsiklauri, and N. Z. Takibayev, Search and research of ¯KN N Nand ¯K ¯KN Nantikaonic clusters, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.121, 103909 (2021)

work page 2021
[7]

E. O. Alt, P. Grassberger, and W. Sandhas, Reduction of the three-particle collision problem, Nucl. Phys. B2, 167 (1967)

work page 1967
[8]

Marri and S

S. Marri and S. Z. Kalantari, Study of the ¯KN Nbound state with Faddeev equations in momentum space, Eur. Phys. J. A52, 282 (2016)

work page 2016
[9]

Marri, S

S. Marri, S. Z. Kalantari, and J. Esmaili, Investigation of the ¯KN Nsystem in the relativistic three-body Faddeev approach, Eur. Phys. J. A52, 361 (2016)

work page 2016
[10]

Marri and J

S. Marri and J. Esmaili, Analysis of the ¯KN Nsystem using relativistic Faddeev equations, Eur. Phys. J. A55, 43 (2019)

work page 2019
[11]

N. V. Shevchenko, Quasibound state in the ¯KN N Nsystem, Phys. Rev. C106, 064006 (2022)

work page 2022
[12]

N. V. Shevchenko, A. Gal, and J. Mareˇ s, Faddeev calculation of aK −ppquasi-bound state, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 082301 (2007)

work page 2007
[13]

N. V. Shevchenko, A. Gal, J. Mareˇ s, and J. R´ evai,¯KN Nquasi-bound state and the ¯KNinteraction, Phys. Rev. C76, 044004 (2007)

work page 2007
[14]

Ikeda and T

Y. Ikeda and T. Sato, Strange dibaryon resonance in the ¯KN N−πY Nsystem, Phys. Rev. C76, 035203 (2007)

work page 2007
[15]

Ikeda and T

Y. Ikeda and T. Sato, Resonance energy of the ¯KN N−πY Nsystem, Phys. Rev. C79, 035201 (2009)

work page 2009
[16]

Ikeda, H

Y. Ikeda, H. Kamano, and T. Sato, Energy dependence of ¯KNinteractions and resonance pole of strange dibaryons, Prog. Theor. Phys.124, 533 (2010)

work page 2010
[17]

R´ evai and N

J. R´ evai and N. V. Shevchenko, Quasi-bound state in the ¯KN N−πΣNsystem, Phys. Rev. C90, 034004 (2014)

work page 2014
[18]

R. Ya. Kezerashvili, S. M. Tsiklauri, I. Filikhin, V. M. Suslov, and B. Vlahovic, Three-body calculations for theK −pp system within potential models, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.43, 065104 (2016)

work page 2016
[19]

Maeda, Y

S. Maeda, Y. Akaishi, and T. Yamazaki, Strong binding and shrinkage of the ¯KN Nsystem in a hybrid ¯KNpotential model, Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B89, 418 (2013)

work page 2013
[20]

Bayar, J

M. Bayar, J. Yamagata-Sekihara, and E. Oset, The ¯KN Nsystem with chiral dynamics, Phys. Rev. C84, 015209 (2011)

work page 2011
[21]

Bayar and E

M. Bayar and E. Oset, Improved fixed center approximation of the Faddeev equations for the ¯KN Nsystem withS= 0, Nucl. Phys. A883, 57 (2012)

work page 2012
[22]

Bayar and E

M. Bayar and E. Oset, The ¯KN Nsystem revisited including absorption, Nucl. Phys. A914, 349 (2013)

work page 2013
[23]

Acharya and et al., Experimental evidence for an attractivep–ϕinteraction, Phys

S. Acharya and et al., Experimental evidence for an attractivep–ϕinteraction, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 172301 (2021)

work page 2021
[24]

Y. Lyu, T. Doi, T. Hatsuda, Y. Ikeda, J. Meng, K. Sasaki, and T. Sugiura, AttractiveN–ϕinteraction and two-pion tail from lattice QCD near physical point, Phys. Rev. D106, 074507 (2022)

work page 2022
[25]

Chizzali, Y

E. Chizzali, Y. Kamiya, R. Del Grande, T. Doi, L. Fabbietti, T. Hatsuda, and Y. Lyu, Indication of ap–ϕbound state from a correlation function analysis, Phys. Lett. B848, 138358 (2024)

work page 2024
[26]

V. B. Belyaev, W. Sandhas, and I. I. Shlyk, 3- and 4-body meson-nuclear clusters, arXiv:nucl-th/0903.1703 (2009)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[27]

Filikhin, R

I. Filikhin, R. Ya. Kezerashvili, and B. Vlahovic, Possible 3 ϕH hypernucleus with HAL QCD interaction, Phys. Rev. D110, L031502 (2024)

work page 2024
[28]

V. B. Belyaev, W. Sandhas, and I. I. Shlyk, New nuclear three-body clustersϕN N, Few-Body Syst.44, 347 (2008)

work page 2008
[29]

Etminan and A

F. Etminan and A. Aalimi, Examination of theϕ–N Nbound-state problem with lattice QCDN–ϕpotentials, Phys. Rev. C109, 054002 (2024)

work page 2024
[30]

Wen and et al.,ϕN N,J/ψN N,η cN Nsystems based on HAL QCD interactions, Phys

L.-Z. Wen and et al.,ϕN N,J/ψN N,η cN Nsystems based on HAL QCD interactions, Phys. Rev. D111, 114004 (2025). 6

work page 2025
[31]

Gao, T.-S

H. Gao, T.-S. H. Lee, and V. Marinov,φ–Nbound state, Phys. Rev. C63, 022201 (2001)

work page 2001
[32]

Malfliet and J

R. Malfliet and J. Tjon, Solution of the Faddeev equations for the triton problem using local two-particle interactions, Nucl. Phys. A127, 161 (1969)

work page 1969
[33]

J. L. Friar, B. F. Gibson, G. Berthold, W. Gl¨ ockle, T. Cornelius, H. Wita la, J. Haidenbauer, Y. Koike, G. L. Payne, J. A. Tjon, and W. M. Kloet, Benchmark solutions for a model three-nucleon scattering problem, Phys. Rev. C42, 1838 (1990)

work page 1990
[34]

O. A. Yakubovsky, On the integral equations in the theory of N-particle scattering, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.5, 937 (1967), english translation of Yad. Fiz. 5, 1312 (1967)

work page 1967
[35]

Nogga,Few-Body Physics with Modern Nuclear Forces, Ph.D

A. Nogga,Few-Body Physics with Modern Nuclear Forces, Ph.D. thesis, Ruhr-Universit¨ at Bochum, Bochum (2001)

work page 2001
[36]

Nogga, H

A. Nogga, H. Kamada, and W. Gloeckle, The hypernuclei 4 ΛHe and 4 ΛH: challenges for modern hyperon-nucleon forces, Physical Review Letters88, 172501 (2002)

work page 2002
[37]

Lazauskas, Description of five-nucleon systems using Faddeev-Yakubovsky equations, Few-Body Systems59, 13 (2018)

R. Lazauskas, Description of five-nucleon systems using Faddeev-Yakubovsky equations, Few-Body Systems59, 13 (2018)

work page 2018
[38]

Lazauskas, Solution of the n- 4He elastic scattering problem using the Faddeev-Yakubovsky equations, Phys

R. Lazauskas, Solution of the n- 4He elastic scattering problem using the Faddeev-Yakubovsky equations, Phys. Rev. C97, 044002 (2018)

work page 2018
[39]

R. B. Wiringa, V. G. J. Stoks, and R. Schiavilla, Accurate nucleon-nucleon potential with charge-independence breaking, Phys. Rev. C51, 38 (1995)

work page 1995
[40]

Tarr´ us Castell` a and G

J. Tarr´ us Castell` a and G. A. Krein, Effective field theory for the nucleon–quarkonium interaction, Phys. Rev. D98, 014029 (2018)

work page 2018
[41]

Sasakawa, Five-body equation, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement - Prog

T. Sasakawa, Five-body equation, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement - Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.61, 149 (1977)

work page 1977
[42]

A. A. Kvitsinsky, Y. A. Kuperin, S. P. Merkuriev, A. K. Motovilov, and S. L. Yakovlev, N-body quantum problem in configuration space, Fiz. Elem. Chastits At. Yadra17, 267 (1986), in Russian

work page 1986
[43]

Deltuva, A

A. Deltuva, A. C. Fonseca, and R. Lazauskas, Faddeev equation approach for three-cluster nuclear reactions, inClusters in Nuclei, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 875, edited by C. Beck (Springer, Cham, 2014)

work page 2014
[44]

Hiyama, R

E. Hiyama, R. Lazauskas, F. M. Marqu´ es, and J. Carbonell, Modeling19B as a 17B–n–n three-body system in the unitary limit, Phys. Rev. C100, 011603 (2019)

work page 2019
[45]

Lazauskas and J

R. Lazauskas and J. Carbonell, The Faddeev–Yakubovsky symphony, Few-Body Syst.60, 62 (2019)

work page 2019
[46]

Filikhin, R

I. Filikhin, R. Ya. Kezerashvili, and B. Vlahovic, The charge and mass symmetry breaking in theKK ¯Ksystem, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.51, 035102 (2024)

work page 2024
[47]

Baye, The Lagrange-mesh method, Phys

D. Baye, The Lagrange-mesh method, Phys. Rep.565, 1 (2015)

work page 2015
[48]

Filikhin, R

I. Filikhin, R. Ya. Kezerashvili, and B. Vlahovic, Study of lightϕ-mesic nuclei with HAL QCDϕNinteractions, J. Subatomic Particles & Cosmology4, 100117 (2025)

work page 2025
[49]

Duerinck, A

P.-Y. Duerinck, A. Deltuva, J. Dohet-Eraly, M. Gattobigio, A. Kievsky, R. Lazauskas, D. Likandrovas, and M. Viviani, Excited state of theαparticle: A benchmark study, Phys. Rev. C112, 044001 (2025)

work page 2025

[1] [1]

components, indicating a possible bound state in theϕN( 2S1/2) channel, with absorptive effects arising from S-wave coupling to ΛKand ΣKchannels [23, 24]. Three-body calculations of theϕN Nsystem have been carried out by solving differential Faddeev equations [25, 26], variational [27], hyperspherical expansions [28], and coupled-channel complex-scaling a...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

[2] [2]

Yamazaki and Y

T. Yamazaki and Y. Akaishi, Nuclear ¯Kbound states in light nuclei, Phys. Lett. B535, 70 (2002), see also Phys. Rev. C 65, 044005 (2002)

work page 2002

[3] [3]

Hyodo and D

T. Hyodo and D. Jido, The nature of the Λ (1405) resonance in chiral dynamics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.67, 55 (2012)

work page 2012

[4] [4]

A. Gal, E. V. Hungerford, and D. J. Millener, Strangeness in nuclear physics, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035004 (2016)

work page 2016

[5] [5]

R. Ya. Kezerashvili, Strange dibaryonic and tribaryonic clusters, inNeutron Stars: Physics, Properties and Dynamics, edited by N. Takibayev and K. Boshkayev (Nova Science, New York, 2017) pp. 227–271

work page 2017

[6] [6]

R. Ya. Kezerashvili, S. M. Tsiklauri, and N. Z. Takibayev, Search and research of ¯KN N Nand ¯K ¯KN Nantikaonic clusters, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.121, 103909 (2021)

work page 2021

[7] [7]

E. O. Alt, P. Grassberger, and W. Sandhas, Reduction of the three-particle collision problem, Nucl. Phys. B2, 167 (1967)

work page 1967

[8] [8]

Marri and S

S. Marri and S. Z. Kalantari, Study of the ¯KN Nbound state with Faddeev equations in momentum space, Eur. Phys. J. A52, 282 (2016)

work page 2016

[9] [9]

Marri, S

S. Marri, S. Z. Kalantari, and J. Esmaili, Investigation of the ¯KN Nsystem in the relativistic three-body Faddeev approach, Eur. Phys. J. A52, 361 (2016)

work page 2016

[10] [10]

Marri and J

S. Marri and J. Esmaili, Analysis of the ¯KN Nsystem using relativistic Faddeev equations, Eur. Phys. J. A55, 43 (2019)

work page 2019

[11] [11]

N. V. Shevchenko, Quasibound state in the ¯KN N Nsystem, Phys. Rev. C106, 064006 (2022)

work page 2022

[12] [12]

N. V. Shevchenko, A. Gal, and J. Mareˇ s, Faddeev calculation of aK −ppquasi-bound state, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 082301 (2007)

work page 2007

[13] [13]

N. V. Shevchenko, A. Gal, J. Mareˇ s, and J. R´ evai,¯KN Nquasi-bound state and the ¯KNinteraction, Phys. Rev. C76, 044004 (2007)

work page 2007

[14] [14]

Ikeda and T

Y. Ikeda and T. Sato, Strange dibaryon resonance in the ¯KN N−πY Nsystem, Phys. Rev. C76, 035203 (2007)

work page 2007

[15] [15]

Ikeda and T

Y. Ikeda and T. Sato, Resonance energy of the ¯KN N−πY Nsystem, Phys. Rev. C79, 035201 (2009)

work page 2009

[16] [16]

Ikeda, H

Y. Ikeda, H. Kamano, and T. Sato, Energy dependence of ¯KNinteractions and resonance pole of strange dibaryons, Prog. Theor. Phys.124, 533 (2010)

work page 2010

[17] [17]

R´ evai and N

J. R´ evai and N. V. Shevchenko, Quasi-bound state in the ¯KN N−πΣNsystem, Phys. Rev. C90, 034004 (2014)

work page 2014

[18] [18]

R. Ya. Kezerashvili, S. M. Tsiklauri, I. Filikhin, V. M. Suslov, and B. Vlahovic, Three-body calculations for theK −pp system within potential models, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.43, 065104 (2016)

work page 2016

[19] [19]

Maeda, Y

S. Maeda, Y. Akaishi, and T. Yamazaki, Strong binding and shrinkage of the ¯KN Nsystem in a hybrid ¯KNpotential model, Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B89, 418 (2013)

work page 2013

[20] [20]

Bayar, J

M. Bayar, J. Yamagata-Sekihara, and E. Oset, The ¯KN Nsystem with chiral dynamics, Phys. Rev. C84, 015209 (2011)

work page 2011

[21] [21]

Bayar and E

M. Bayar and E. Oset, Improved fixed center approximation of the Faddeev equations for the ¯KN Nsystem withS= 0, Nucl. Phys. A883, 57 (2012)

work page 2012

[22] [22]

Bayar and E

M. Bayar and E. Oset, The ¯KN Nsystem revisited including absorption, Nucl. Phys. A914, 349 (2013)

work page 2013

[23] [23]

Acharya and et al., Experimental evidence for an attractivep–ϕinteraction, Phys

S. Acharya and et al., Experimental evidence for an attractivep–ϕinteraction, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 172301 (2021)

work page 2021

[24] [24]

Y. Lyu, T. Doi, T. Hatsuda, Y. Ikeda, J. Meng, K. Sasaki, and T. Sugiura, AttractiveN–ϕinteraction and two-pion tail from lattice QCD near physical point, Phys. Rev. D106, 074507 (2022)

work page 2022

[25] [25]

Chizzali, Y

E. Chizzali, Y. Kamiya, R. Del Grande, T. Doi, L. Fabbietti, T. Hatsuda, and Y. Lyu, Indication of ap–ϕbound state from a correlation function analysis, Phys. Lett. B848, 138358 (2024)

work page 2024

[26] [26]

V. B. Belyaev, W. Sandhas, and I. I. Shlyk, 3- and 4-body meson-nuclear clusters, arXiv:nucl-th/0903.1703 (2009)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[27] [27]

Filikhin, R

I. Filikhin, R. Ya. Kezerashvili, and B. Vlahovic, Possible 3 ϕH hypernucleus with HAL QCD interaction, Phys. Rev. D110, L031502 (2024)

work page 2024

[28] [28]

V. B. Belyaev, W. Sandhas, and I. I. Shlyk, New nuclear three-body clustersϕN N, Few-Body Syst.44, 347 (2008)

work page 2008

[29] [29]

Etminan and A

F. Etminan and A. Aalimi, Examination of theϕ–N Nbound-state problem with lattice QCDN–ϕpotentials, Phys. Rev. C109, 054002 (2024)

work page 2024

[30] [30]

Wen and et al.,ϕN N,J/ψN N,η cN Nsystems based on HAL QCD interactions, Phys

L.-Z. Wen and et al.,ϕN N,J/ψN N,η cN Nsystems based on HAL QCD interactions, Phys. Rev. D111, 114004 (2025). 6

work page 2025

[31] [31]

Gao, T.-S

H. Gao, T.-S. H. Lee, and V. Marinov,φ–Nbound state, Phys. Rev. C63, 022201 (2001)

work page 2001

[32] [32]

Malfliet and J

R. Malfliet and J. Tjon, Solution of the Faddeev equations for the triton problem using local two-particle interactions, Nucl. Phys. A127, 161 (1969)

work page 1969

[33] [33]

J. L. Friar, B. F. Gibson, G. Berthold, W. Gl¨ ockle, T. Cornelius, H. Wita la, J. Haidenbauer, Y. Koike, G. L. Payne, J. A. Tjon, and W. M. Kloet, Benchmark solutions for a model three-nucleon scattering problem, Phys. Rev. C42, 1838 (1990)

work page 1990

[34] [34]

O. A. Yakubovsky, On the integral equations in the theory of N-particle scattering, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.5, 937 (1967), english translation of Yad. Fiz. 5, 1312 (1967)

work page 1967

[35] [35]

Nogga,Few-Body Physics with Modern Nuclear Forces, Ph.D

A. Nogga,Few-Body Physics with Modern Nuclear Forces, Ph.D. thesis, Ruhr-Universit¨ at Bochum, Bochum (2001)

work page 2001

[36] [36]

Nogga, H

A. Nogga, H. Kamada, and W. Gloeckle, The hypernuclei 4 ΛHe and 4 ΛH: challenges for modern hyperon-nucleon forces, Physical Review Letters88, 172501 (2002)

work page 2002

[37] [37]

Lazauskas, Description of five-nucleon systems using Faddeev-Yakubovsky equations, Few-Body Systems59, 13 (2018)

R. Lazauskas, Description of five-nucleon systems using Faddeev-Yakubovsky equations, Few-Body Systems59, 13 (2018)

work page 2018

[38] [38]

Lazauskas, Solution of the n- 4He elastic scattering problem using the Faddeev-Yakubovsky equations, Phys

R. Lazauskas, Solution of the n- 4He elastic scattering problem using the Faddeev-Yakubovsky equations, Phys. Rev. C97, 044002 (2018)

work page 2018

[39] [39]

R. B. Wiringa, V. G. J. Stoks, and R. Schiavilla, Accurate nucleon-nucleon potential with charge-independence breaking, Phys. Rev. C51, 38 (1995)

work page 1995

[40] [40]

Tarr´ us Castell` a and G

J. Tarr´ us Castell` a and G. A. Krein, Effective field theory for the nucleon–quarkonium interaction, Phys. Rev. D98, 014029 (2018)

work page 2018

[41] [41]

Sasakawa, Five-body equation, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement - Prog

T. Sasakawa, Five-body equation, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement - Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.61, 149 (1977)

work page 1977

[42] [42]

A. A. Kvitsinsky, Y. A. Kuperin, S. P. Merkuriev, A. K. Motovilov, and S. L. Yakovlev, N-body quantum problem in configuration space, Fiz. Elem. Chastits At. Yadra17, 267 (1986), in Russian

work page 1986

[43] [43]

Deltuva, A

A. Deltuva, A. C. Fonseca, and R. Lazauskas, Faddeev equation approach for three-cluster nuclear reactions, inClusters in Nuclei, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 875, edited by C. Beck (Springer, Cham, 2014)

work page 2014

[44] [44]

Hiyama, R

E. Hiyama, R. Lazauskas, F. M. Marqu´ es, and J. Carbonell, Modeling19B as a 17B–n–n three-body system in the unitary limit, Phys. Rev. C100, 011603 (2019)

work page 2019

[45] [45]

Lazauskas and J

R. Lazauskas and J. Carbonell, The Faddeev–Yakubovsky symphony, Few-Body Syst.60, 62 (2019)

work page 2019

[46] [46]

Filikhin, R

I. Filikhin, R. Ya. Kezerashvili, and B. Vlahovic, The charge and mass symmetry breaking in theKK ¯Ksystem, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.51, 035102 (2024)

work page 2024

[47] [47]

Baye, The Lagrange-mesh method, Phys

D. Baye, The Lagrange-mesh method, Phys. Rep.565, 1 (2015)

work page 2015

[48] [48]

Filikhin, R

I. Filikhin, R. Ya. Kezerashvili, and B. Vlahovic, Study of lightϕ-mesic nuclei with HAL QCDϕNinteractions, J. Subatomic Particles & Cosmology4, 100117 (2025)

work page 2025

[49] [49]

Duerinck, A

P.-Y. Duerinck, A. Deltuva, J. Dohet-Eraly, M. Gattobigio, A. Kievsky, R. Lazauskas, D. Likandrovas, and M. Viviani, Excited state of theαparticle: A benchmark study, Phys. Rev. C112, 044001 (2025)

work page 2025