arxiv: 2601.15592 · v4 · submitted 2026-01-22 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: no theorem link

Extended symmetry of the Maxwell theory with a gauge coupling constant as a conserved charge

Sojeong Cheong , Myungseok Eune , Wontae Kim , Mungon Nam

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 12:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc

keywords Maxwell theorygauge coupling constantBFT formalismsecond-class constraintsextended phase spacelocal symmetriesgauge fixingconserved charge

0 comments

The pith

Maxwell theory with promoted coupling constant is the gauge-fixed version of a larger theory with all local symmetries restored.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Promoting a gauge coupling constant to auxiliary fields in Maxwell theory breaks some local symmetries and turns certain constraints second-class. The BFT formalism converts those constraints back to first-class ones on an extended phase space, producing a fully symmetric action. In the resulting theory the original Maxwell equations and action reappear by choosing a specific gauge. No extra conserved charges accompany the recovered symmetries. The construction shows how the original formulation sits inside a larger symmetric structure without altering its physical content.

Core claim

Applying the BFT formalism to the Hamiltonian constraints of Maxwell theory with auxiliary fields for the coupling constant converts all second-class constraints into first-class ones. The resulting extended action is defined on a larger configuration space and possesses the complete set of local symmetries. Gauge fixing in this extended theory recovers the original Maxwell theory exactly, with no additional conserved charges generated by the restored symmetries.

What carries the argument

BFT formalism that converts second-class constraints arising from auxiliary fields into first-class constraints, yielding an extended action with full local symmetries.

If this is right

The extended theory has exactly the same physical content as the original Maxwell theory.
Local symmetries are restored on the enlarged space while the coupling constant remains a conserved charge.
The original formulation appears as one particular gauge choice inside the larger symmetric theory.
No new conserved charges are associated with the symmetries recovered by the BFT extension.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same embedding procedure could be tested on other gauge theories where promoting constants initially breaks symmetries.
Gauge fixing in the extended theory may be reinterpreted as selecting a slice that hides part of the symmetry structure.
The absence of new charges suggests that symmetry restoration here is purely a matter of enlarging the phase space rather than introducing new physical degrees of freedom.

Load-bearing premise

The BFT procedure can be applied to this system to restore all local symmetries without changing the physical content or introducing inconsistencies.

What would settle it

A direct count of physical degrees of freedom or a computation of the gauge-invariant observables in the extended theory that differs from those of ordinary Maxwell theory would falsify the claim that the original theory is recovered by gauge fixing.

read the original abstract

It has been proposed that any coupling constant in a covariant action can be treated as a conserved charge by promoting the coupling constant to auxiliary fields, typically realized by a scalar field paired with a higher-form gauge field. However, the procedure may break local symmetries, which can be explicitly shown in a simpler setting such as Maxwell theory. The Hamiltonian analysis of Maxwell theory with the auxiliary fields reveals that some of the constraints are second-class. Applying the BFT formalism, we restore the broken local symmetries and obtain a fully symmetric action defined on an extended configuration space. Despite the restoration of the local symmetries, no additional conserved charges are associated with the recovered symmetries. Consequently, the original theory turns out to be the gauge-fixed version of the extended theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper applies BFT to restore symmetries after promoting the Maxwell coupling constant to auxiliary fields, claiming the original theory emerges exactly as a gauge-fixed version with no new charges, but the explicit reduction steps need checking to confirm equivalence.

read the letter

The core result is that promoting the coupling to auxiliaries in Maxwell theory produces second-class constraints, BFT converts them to first-class, symmetries return, and the original action is recovered by gauge fixing the extension without extra conserved charges from the new symmetries. This is a targeted application of known techniques rather than a broad new framework. They do the initial Hamiltonian analysis cleanly, identifying where the auxiliaries break the local symmetries and producing the second-class constraints in a straightforward way. That part is useful as a concrete example of the procedure in a simple gauge theory. The BFT restoration and the claim that no new charges appear follow from the construction, which is consistent on its own terms. The soft spot is the equivalence to the original theory. The abstract states that the extended theory gauge-fixes back exactly, but without the explicit BFT auxiliary fields, the modified brackets, or the gauge-fixing map shown in detail, it is hard to verify that the reduced dynamics and constraint surface match the starting Maxwell-plus-auxiliary system with no residual effects. The stress-test note correctly flags this: if the BFT fields stay purely gauge and the Hamiltonian generates the same evolution, the claim holds; otherwise the reduction is incomplete. The full paper presumably contains these steps, but they are not visible from the abstract alone. This is for people working on constrained Hamiltonian systems and symmetry restoration in gauge theories. A reader who wants a worked Maxwell example of promoting couplings would get value from the constraint analysis. It deserves peer review because the logic is coherent, the methods are standard and reproducible, and the question is well-posed even if the final verification could be expanded for clarity.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that promoting the gauge coupling constant to auxiliary fields (a scalar paired with a higher-form gauge field) in Maxwell theory breaks local symmetries, as shown by Hamiltonian analysis revealing second-class constraints. Applying the BFT formalism restores these symmetries in an extended configuration space, yielding a fully symmetric extended action with no additional conserved charges; consequently, the original theory is recovered as a gauge-fixed version of the extended theory.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work offers a concrete mechanism for embedding coupling constants as conserved charges within a larger symmetric structure without altering physical content. This could inform treatments of parameters in gauge theories and constrained Hamiltonian systems, particularly where symmetry restoration via extensions is desirable.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3 (Hamiltonian analysis): the classification of constraints as second-class after introducing auxiliary fields is asserted without exhibiting the Poisson bracket matrix or its rank, which is required to confirm the need for BFT and to ensure the subsequent extension does not alter the original constraint surface.
[§4] §4 (BFT extension): the explicit BFT auxiliary fields, the modified brackets, and the gauge-fixing map that sets the new variables to zero are not provided, so it cannot be verified that the extended Hamiltonian reproduces the original dynamics on the reduced phase space without new physical modes or residual second-class constraints.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract and introduction could specify the precise form of the higher-form gauge field used for the auxiliary pair to aid readability.
[§4] Notation for the extended phase-space variables is introduced without a summary table; adding one would clarify the counting of degrees of freedom.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We agree that the Hamiltonian analysis and BFT construction require more explicit details to allow full verification. We will revise the manuscript to include these calculations.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (Hamiltonian analysis): the classification of constraints as second-class after introducing auxiliary fields is asserted without exhibiting the Poisson bracket matrix or its rank, which is required to confirm the need for BFT and to ensure the subsequent extension does not alter the original constraint surface.

Authors: We acknowledge that the explicit Poisson bracket matrix and its rank were not displayed. In the revised version we will compute the full set of Poisson brackets among the primary and secondary constraints, present the matrix, demonstrate that it has full rank (confirming the second-class character), and verify that the BFT extension preserves the original constraint surface without introducing new physical degrees of freedom. revision: yes
Referee: [§4] §4 (BFT extension): the explicit BFT auxiliary fields, the modified brackets, and the gauge-fixing map that sets the new variables to zero are not provided, so it cannot be verified that the extended Hamiltonian reproduces the original dynamics on the reduced phase space without new physical modes or residual second-class constraints.

Authors: We agree that the explicit BFT auxiliary fields, the modified Poisson brackets, and the gauge-fixing map must be supplied. In the revision we will give the concrete expressions for the BFT fields, the extended brackets, and the gauge-fixing conditions that set the new variables to zero. We will then show that the resulting extended Hamiltonian reproduces the original dynamics on the reduced phase space, with no additional physical modes and no residual second-class constraints. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper performs a standard Hamiltonian analysis to identify second-class constraints after promoting the gauge coupling to auxiliary fields, then applies the external BFT formalism to convert them to first-class constraints and restore local symmetries. The conclusion that the original theory is recovered as the gauge-fixed version of the extended theory follows directly from the known properties of the BFT procedure rather than any self-referential definition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation. No equations or steps in the provided abstract reduce to their inputs by construction, and the derivation remains self-contained against the independent BFT benchmark.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard applicability of the BFT formalism to convert second-class constraints arising from auxiliary-field promotion without altering physical content.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The BFT formalism converts second-class constraints to first-class constraints while preserving the physical content of the theory.
Invoked to restore local symmetries after auxiliary-field introduction breaks them.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5433 in / 1256 out tokens · 95198 ms · 2026-05-16T12:34:19.009252+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · 12 internal anchors

[1]

To satisfy the relation, we chooseϵ (n)i 3 =∂ i(α(n) −α (n−1)) +δ n0∂µΛiµ andϵ i 5 =−Λ 0i along with ϵ(n) 2 = ˙α(n), whereα (n) is a gauge parameter satisfyingα (−1) = 0. In Eq. (42),ϵ (n) 1 is also replaced byϵ (n) for simplicity. Then, the gauge transformations of all fields in Eqs. (41)-(44) can be written as δA(0) µ =∂ µλ, δσ (n) =ϵ (n) −ϵ (n−1), δχ (...

work page 2020
[2]

Bekenstein,Black holes and entropy,Phys

J.D. Bekenstein,Black holes and entropy,Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 2333. 11

work page 1973
[3]

Bekenstein,Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black hole physics,Phys

J.D. Bekenstein,Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black hole physics,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 3292

work page 1974
[4]

Henneaux and C

M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim,The cosmological constant as a canonical variable,Phys. Lett. B143(1984) 415

work page 1984
[5]

Henneaux and C

M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim,The Cosmological Constant and General Covariance,Phys. Lett. B222(1989) 195

work page 1989
[6]

Teitelboim,THE COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT AS A THERMODYNAMIC BLACK HOLE PARAMETER,Phys

C. Teitelboim,THE COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT AS A THERMODYNAMIC BLACK HOLE PARAMETER,Phys. Lett. B158(1985) 293

work page 1985
[7]

Enthalpy and the Mechanics of AdS Black Holes

D. Kastor, S. Ray and J. Traschen,Enthalpy and the Mechanics of AdS Black Holes,Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009) 195011 [0904.2765]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[8]

Black Hole Enthalpy and an Entropy Inequality for the Thermodynamic Volume

M. Cvetic, G.W. Gibbons, D. Kubiznak and C.N. Pope,Black Hole Enthalpy and an Entropy Inequality for the Thermodynamic Volume,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 024037 [1012.2888]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[9]

The cosmological constant and the black hole equation of state

B.P. Dolan,The cosmological constant and the black hole equation of state,Class. Quant. Grav.28(2011) 125020 [1008.5023]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[10]

Pressure and volume in the first law of black hole thermodynamics

B.P. Dolan,Pressure and volume in the first law of black hole thermodynamics,Class. Quant. Grav.28(2011) 235017 [1106.6260]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[11]

Lower-Dimensional Black Hole Chemistry

A.M. Frassino, R.B. Mann and J.R. Mureika,Lower-Dimensional Black Hole Chemistry, Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 124069 [1509.05481]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[12]

Black hole chemistry: thermodynamics with Lambda

D. Kubiznak, R.B. Mann and M. Teo,Black hole chemistry: thermodynamics with Lambda, Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017) 063001 [1608.06147]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2017
[13]

Thermogeometric description of the van der Waals like phase transition in AdS black holes

K. Bhattacharya and B.R. Majhi,Thermogeometric description of the van der Waals like phase transition in AdS black holes,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 104024 [1702.07174]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[14]

Ort´ ın,Komar integrals for theories of higher order in the Riemann curvature and black-hole chemistry,JHEP08(2021) 023 [2104.10717]

T. Ort´ ın,Komar integrals for theories of higher order in the Riemann curvature and black-hole chemistry,JHEP08(2021) 023 [2104.10717]

work page arXiv 2021
[15]

Mann,Black hole chemistry: The first 15 years,Int

R.B. Mann,Black hole chemistry: The first 15 years,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D34(2025) 2542001 [2508.01830]

work page arXiv 2025
[16]

Aurilia, H

A. Aurilia, H. Nicolai and P.K. Townsend,Hidden Constants: The Theta Parameter of QCD and the Cosmological Constant of N=8 Supergravity,Nucl. Phys. B176(1980) 509

work page 1980
[17]

Duff and P

M.J. Duff and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,Quantum Inequivalence of Different Field Representations,Phys. Lett. B94(1980) 179

work page 1980
[18]

Hawking,The Cosmological Constant Is Probably Zero,Phys

S.W. Hawking,The Cosmological Constant Is Probably Zero,Phys. Lett. B134(1984) 403. 12

work page 1984
[19]

Quantization of Four-form Fluxes and Dynamical Neutralization of the Cosmological Constant

R. Bousso and J. Polchinski,Quantization of four form fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant,JHEP06(2000) 006 [hep-th/0004134]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[20]

Cosmological constant is a conserved charge

D. Chernyavsky and K. Hajian,Cosmological constant is a conserved charge,Class. Quant. Grav.35(2018) 125012 [1710.07904]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[21]

Hajian, H

K. Hajian, H. ¨Oz¸ sahin and B. Tekin,First law of black hole thermodynamics and Smarr formula with a cosmological constant,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 044024 [2103.10983]

work page arXiv 2021
[22]

Meessen, D

P. Meessen, D. Mitsios and T. Ort´ ın,Black hole chemistry, the cosmological constant and the embedding tensor,JHEP12(2022) 155 [2203.13588]

work page arXiv 2022
[23]

Zatti,α ′ corrections to 4-dimensional non-extremal stringy black holes,JHEP11(2023) 185 [2308.12879]

M. Zatti,α ′ corrections to 4-dimensional non-extremal stringy black holes,JHEP11(2023) 185 [2308.12879]

work page arXiv 2023
[24]

Ballesteros and T

R. Ballesteros and T. Ort´ ın,Hairy black holes, scalar charges and extended thermodynamics, Class. Quant. Grav.41(2024) 055007 [2308.04994]

work page arXiv 2024
[25]

Hajian and B

K. Hajian and B. Tekin,Coupling Constants as Conserved Charges in Black Hole Thermodynamics,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 191401 [2309.07634]

work page arXiv 2024
[26]

Dirac,Lectures on quantum mechanics, vol

P.A.M. Dirac,Lectures on quantum mechanics, vol. 2, Courier Corporation (2001)

work page 2001
[27]

Wess and B

J. Wess and B. Zumino,Consequences of anomalous Ward identities,Phys. Lett. B37 (1971) 95

work page 1971
[28]

Faddeev and S.L

L.D. Faddeev and S.L. Shatashvili,Realization of the Schwinger Term in the Gauss Law and the Possibility of Correct Quantization of a Theory with Anomalies,Phys. Lett. B167 (1986) 225

work page 1986
[29]

Babelon, F.A

O. Babelon, F.A. Schaposnik and C.M. Viallet,Quantization of Gauge Theories with Weyl Fermions,Phys. Lett. B177(1986) 385

work page 1986
[30]

Harada and I

K. Harada and I. Tsutsui,On the Path Integral Quantization of Anomalous Gauge Theories, Phys. Lett. B183(1987) 311

work page 1987
[31]

Miyake and K.-i

S. Miyake and K.-i. Shizuya,Fermions in the Chiral Schwinger Model,Phys. Rev. D36 (1987) 3781

work page 1987
[32]

Batalin and E.S

I.A. Batalin and E.S. Fradkin,Operator Quantization of Dynamical Systems With Irreducible First and Second Class Constraints,Phys. Lett. B180(1986) 157

work page 1986
[33]

Batalin and E.S

I.A. Batalin and E.S. Fradkin,Operatorial Quantization of Dynamical Systems Subject to Second Class Constraints,Nucl. Phys. B279(1987) 514. 13

work page 1987
[34]

Batalin and I.V

I.A. Batalin and I.V. Tyutin,Existence theorem for the effective gauge algebra in the generalized canonical formalism with Abelian conversion of second class constraints,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A6(1991) 3255

work page 1991
[35]

Banerjee,Hamiltonian embedding of a second class system with a Chern-Simons term, Phys

R. Banerjee,Hamiltonian embedding of a second class system with a Chern-Simons term, Phys. Rev. D48(1993) R5467

work page 1993
[36]

Batalin-Tyutin Quantization of the (2+1) dimensional nonabelian Chern-Simons field theory

W.T. Kim and Y.-J. Park,Batalin-Tyutin quantization of the (2+1)-dimensional nonAbelian Chern-Simons field theory,Phys. Lett. B336(1994) 376 [hep-th/9403188]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994
[37]

Fujiwara, Y

T. Fujiwara, Y. Igarashi and J. Kubo,Anomalous Gauge Theories and Subcritical Strings Based on the Batalin-fradkin Formalism,Nucl. Phys. B341(1990) 695

work page 1990
[38]

Fujiwara, Y

T. Fujiwara, Y. Igarashi and J. Kubo,Anomalous nonAbelian gauge theories based on the Batalin-Fradkin formalism,Phys. Lett. B251(1990) 427

work page 1990
[39]

Kim, S.-K

Y.-W. Kim, S.-K. Kim, W.-T. Kim, Y.-J. Park, K.Y. Kim and Y. Kim,The chiral Schwinger model based on the Batalin-Fradkin-Vilkovisky formalism,Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 4574

work page 1992
[40]

Banerjee, H.J

R. Banerjee, H.J. Rothe and K.D. Rothe,Batalin-Fradkin quantization of anomalous chiral gauge theories,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 5438

work page 1994
[41]

McClain, F

B. McClain, F. Yu and Y.S. Wu,Covariant quantization of chiral bosons and OSp(1,1—2) symmetry,Nucl. Phys. B343(1990) 689

work page 1990
[42]

Wotzasek,The Wess-Zumino term for chiral bosons,Phys

C. Wotzasek,The Wess-Zumino term for chiral bosons,Phys. Rev. Lett.66(1991) 129

work page 1991
[43]

Amorim and J

R. Amorim and J. Barcelos-Neto,BFT quantization of the FJ chiral boson,Phys. Lett. B 333(1994) 413

work page 1994
[44]

BFT Quantization of Chiral-Boson Theories

R. Amorim and J. Barcelos-Neto,BFT quantization of chiral boson theories,Phys. Rev. D 53(1996) 7129 [hep-th/9408038]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[45]

BFT Embedding of Non-commutative Chiral Bosons

W. Kim, Y.-J. Park, H. Shin and M.S. Yoon,BFT Embedding of Non-commutative Chiral Bosons,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 087702 [hep-th/0612158]. 14

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007