Enhanced Terahertz Photoresponse via Acoustic Plasmon Cavity Resonances in Scalable Graphene

Alessandro Principi; Domenico De Fazio; Elefterios Lidorikis; Frank H. L. Koppens; Ioannis Vangelidis; Karuppasamy P. Soundarapandian; Luis Mart\'in-Moreno; Riccardo Bertini; Roshan K. Kumar; Sebasti\'an Castilla

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 80 references

Enhanced Terahertz Photoresponse via Acoustic Plasmon Cavity Resonances in Scalable Graphene

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two gate-tunable photovoltage peaks in a CVD-graphene THz detector are shown to be acoustic-plasmon standing-wave cavity modes that enhance the photo-thermoelectric response by up to ~40%.

desk verdict Strong data, but the claimed AGP Fabry-Pérot modes are contradicted by the paper's own damping parameters. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.16604 v1 pith:BWILGSWC submitted 2026-01-23 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-phphysics.optics

Domenico De Fazio , Sebastián Castilla , Karuppasamy P. Soundarapandian , Tetiana Slipchenko , Ioannis Vangelidis , Simone Marconi , Riccardo Bertini , Vlad Petrica

show 6 more authors

Yang Hao Alessandro Principi Elefterios Lidorikis Roshan K. Kumar Luis Martín-Moreno Frank H. L. Koppens

This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-phphysics.optics

keywords grapheneacousticplasmonsterahertzphotodetectorphoto-thermoelectriceffectFabry-PérotcavityCVDplasmonresonancegate-tunable

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that two photovoltage peaks observed in a CVD-graphene THz device at 6 K are acoustic graphene plasmon (AGP) standing waves formed in Fabry–Pérot cavities: a four-node mode spanning the full 2 µm channel and a two-node mode confined to the right half-channel. According to the authors, these AGP resonances modulate the photo-thermoelectric response by up to about 40% at 6 K (and ~25–30% for the second mode), vanishing at ~130 K as damping rises. The demonstration matters because it shows that wafer-scalable CVD monolayer graphene, without hBN encapsulation, can host coherent AGP resonances, offering a scalable route to polarization- and frequency-selective, liquid-nitrogen-cooled THz detectors.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the dipole-antenna split gate: its two lobes act simultaneously as gate electrodes, near-field THz launchers for acoustic plasmons, and reflectors defining the Fabry–Pérot cavity. The resonance condition is λ = 2L_c/m, with the effective plasmon wavelength for the inhomogeneous channel given by the harmonic mean of the local wavelengths under the left and right gates; the gap's conductivity profile determines whether the full channel or a half-channel subcavity supports the mode, and the photo-thermoelectric readout converts the standing-wave absorption into a gate-tunable voltage via the Mott relation.

What would settle it

Direct near-field photocurrent imaging at the claimed resonance voltages should reveal four antinodes for the first peak and two for the second; alternatively, building devices with channel lengths L = 1, 2, 4 µm should shift both peaks so that λ_eff = 2L/m holds at fixed gate voltage. A more severe test: with Q ≈ 0.8 the plasmon amplitude decay length is ~130 nm, far shorter than the 2 µm channel, so measuring the standing-wave visibility along the channel would show whether a true cavity mode exists.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that gate-tunable acoustic graphene plasmons form standing-wave Fabry–Pérot modes in a split-gate dipole antenna device. At 2.5 THz and T = 6 K, the photovoltage shows peaks at VRG ≈ −1.2 V and ≈ +0.3 V, which the authors attribute, using full-wave electromagnetic and thermal modelling, to two cavity modes: a full-channel mode (cavity length L = 2 µm, effective plasmon wavelength ≈ 1.18 µm, mode index m = 4) and a right-subcavity mode (cavity length L/2 ≈ 1 µm, right-gate plasmon wavelength ≈ 1.1 µm, m = 2). The simulations yield standing-wave field patterns, gate-controlled plasmon wavelength, and local absorption and heating profiles that, com

Load-bearing premise

The claim stands on simulated field profiles rather than direct measurement of the standing-wave nodes, and on a gate-to-Fermi-energy conversion whose predicted resonance voltages are 0.4–0.9 V away from the measured peaks; if those premises give way, the mode assignment and the AGP-cavity interpretation would need revision.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Scalable CVD graphene without hBN encapsulation can sustain coherent AGP cavity modes at liquid-nitrogen temperatures, easing fabrication of THz detectors.
Resonant AGP modes dominate the photoresponse: the lowest mode alone modulates the PTE signal by ~40% at 6 K, much larger than the few-percent perturbations seen in earlier graphene plasmon detectors.
Gate voltage tunes the AGP wavelength, so the same device can act as a frequency-selective, polarization-selective THz detector with linear power response over two decades.
The architecture (antenna split gate plus PTE readout) maps naturally onto pixelated arrays and is compatible with other van der Waals material stacks.
Operating temperature is currently limited by damping to below ~130 K; improved mobility would push resonances to higher temperatures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper does not directly image the standing-wave patterns; a natural test of the m = 4 / m = 2 assignment is near-field photocurrent or scattering-type optical nanoscopy at the predicted gate voltages.
The model's resonance voltages sit 0.4–0.9 V away from the measured peaks; if the offset stems from the parallel-plate gate conversion EF = sgn(n)ħvF√(π|n|), the AGP-cavity interpretation as stated would need correcting, or the first peak may be partly a near-CNP Seebeck artifact.
The reported Q ≈ 0.8 for the full-channel mode implies an amplitude decay length of ~130 nm, far shorter than the 2 µm channel; a coherent standing wave across the full channel is then questionable, so this consistency check deserves scrutiny.
A testable extension: fabricating the same antenna and cavity geometry with different channel lengths would check whether resonance voltages scale as 1/L, as the Fabry–Pérot picture predicts.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Thanks for the Pith Report. I read the paper in full. The stress-test note is not wrong — it lands. The paper's own Q values imply decay lengths far too short for the claimed standing-wave modes. Q≈0.8 for the full-channel mode gives an amplitude decay length around 150 nm; Q≈2.0 gives about 350 nm. A mode with m=4 spanning the 2 µm channel needs a round trip of at least 4 µm — the reflected wave would be down by a factor of e^{-20} or more. That is not a Fabry-Pérot cavity. The node counts in Fig. 1(c) are read off a simulation that uses conductivities consistent with these short decay lengths, so either the simulation is using an artificially long lifetime, or the field profile is a near-field/antenna artifact rather than a coherent cavity mode. The authors don't address this.

That said, the experimental dataset is strong and honest. The gate-tunable photovoltage peaks, their temperature suppression, polarization dependence, linear power scaling, and the sixfold PTE pattern are all solid controls. The device is carefully made, and the transport fitting is transparent. Demonstrating that non-hBN-encapsulated CVD graphene can show these resonances is a legitimate step beyond refs 26 and 52. The full-wave simulation uses independently measured mobilities, so it is forward modeling in that sense. I'm not accusing anyone of curve-fitting.

Where the paper overreaches is in the cavity interpretation and the 'excellent agreement' phrase. The simulated resonance voltages sit 0.4–0.9 V from the measured peaks, the hole-side resonance is weaker than predicted and then dropped, and there is no near-field imaging or device statistics. These are addressable, but the Q/decay-length problem is more than a missing measurement — it's an internal contradiction between the model and the interpretation.

Who is it for? Anyone working on graphene THz detection or 2D polaritonics. A serious referee should engage because the data are valuable and the issue is resolvable. My recommendation: send it to peer review, but with a referee who will push on the propagation-length argument. If the authors can reconcile the Q values with the standing-wave picture — or better, image the field directly — the paper could become a solid contribution. If not, they should soften the claim to 'resonant absorption features'.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports a split-gate dipole-antenna CVD graphene THz photodetector operating via the photo-thermoelectric effect. At cryogenic temperatures, two gate-tunable photovoltage peaks at VRG ≈ −1.2 V and +0.3 V (2.5 THz illumination) are attributed to acoustic graphene plasmon (AGP) Fabry–Pérot standing-wave modes, one spanning the full 2-µm channel (m = 4, λ_eff ≈ 1.18 µm) and one confined to the right half-channel (m = 2, λ_R ≈ 1.1 µm), based on full-wave FDTD simulations of the field profile and absorption. The paper further reports temperature-induced resonance suppression by 130 K, linear power scaling over two decades, polarization selectivity, and a 40% modulation of the PTE response at 6 K, and claims lateral/vertical confinement factors of 165/4000.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a notable advance: it would show that wafer-scale CVD graphene without hBN encapsulation can host coherent AGP cavity resonances, with potential for scalable, polarization-selective, liquid-nitrogen-cooled THz detectors. The paper’s strengths include a multi-control experimental dataset (gate tunability, temperature suppression, polarization dependence, linear power response, reproducible sixfold PTE symmetry) and a parameter-transparent full-wave simulation whose inputs (mobilities, CNPs) are tied to independent transport fits. These strengths make the paper potentially important. However, the central AGP standing-wave assignment is undermined by an internal inconsistency between the reported plasmon quality factors and the claimed cavity field patterns, as detailed below.

major comments (3)

[Results and Discussion: damping analysis near Fig. 2; Eqs. (6)-(7)] The paper’s own damping analysis gives Q ≈ 0.8 for the full-channel resonance and Q ≈ 2.0 for the half-channel resonance. Using Im(q_p) = Re(q_p)/(ωτ) and the quoted wavelengths, the field-amplitude decay length is L_dec = Qλ/(2π), i.e., ≈ 0.15 µm for λ_eff = 1.18 µm and ≈ 0.35 µm for λ_R = 1.1 µm. A full-channel m = 4 mode traversing L = 2 µm suffers attenuation e^{-2/0.15} ≈ 10^{-6}; a half-channel m = 2 mode with a 2 µm round trip suffers e^{-2/0.35} ≈ 3×10^{-3}. Under such damping the counter-propagating reflected wave is negligible, so the node/antinode structure used to fix m = 4 and m = 2 cannot be a coherent Fabry–Pérot standing wave. The simulated Re(E_x) profiles in Fig. 1(c) must therefore either use an effective τ much larger than the transport mobilities imply, or the oscillatory pattern is a driven near-field distribution rather than a cavity mode. This is a load-bearing in
[Results and Discussion: 'Optoelectronic Measurements' (Figs. 1g,h and Fig. 3a)] The two features assigned as AGP resonances in the measured photovoltage are at VRG ≈ −1.2 V and +0.3 V, while the simulated absorption peaks are at −1.6 V and −0.6 V. The offset is 0.4–0.9 V, comparable to the 1.5 V separation between the two resonances. More importantly, the simulated first peak at −1.6 V coincides with the strong PTE peak at approximately −1.6 V, which the text explicitly attributes to the steep Seebeck variation near the CNP. The measured feature at −1.2 V is a shoulder on that PTE background. The paper presents only simulated total absorption (Fig. 1g), not a simulated photovoltage that includes the PTE contribution. Without such a comparison, the identification of the −1.2 V feature as a distinct AGP cavity resonance is not established.
[Results and Discussion: Eqs. (6)-(7) and the quoted wavelengths] The Fabry–Pérot conditions as stated are not satisfied by the quoted wavelengths. For the full-channel mode, Eq. (6) with L_c = L = 2 µm and m = 4 gives λ_eff = 1 µm, not the quoted 1.18 µm (a 18% deviation). For the half-channel mode, Eq. (7) with L_c = L/2 = 1 µm and m = 2 gives λ_R = 1 µm, not the quoted 1.1 µm (a 10% deviation). These deviations are attributed to 'nearly ideal mirrors,' but the same boundary conditions are also used to justify the integer mode indices. The consistency between the mode order and the extracted wavelengths needs to be demonstrated quantitatively, especially since the node counts are taken from the same simulated field profiles that are in question.

minor comments (3)

[Supplementary Materials, heading] The supplementary section heading 'CONDUCIBILITY' appears to be a typo for 'Conductivity'.
[Throughout main text and supplementary] There are repeated encoding artifacts, e.g., 'Fabry/emdash.cyrP´erot' and 'surface conductivity/emdash.cyrthus' in the caption of Fig. 1. These need to be cleaned before submission.
[Abstract and Conclusions] The 'confinement factors' of 165 and 4000 are quoted as maximum values but without specifying the gate voltages/Fermi energies and frequencies at which they occur. A definition and reference condition would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the AGP-cavity interpretation is a forward-modeled simulation anchored to independent transport data, not a fit to the photovoltage peaks.

full rationale

The paper's central chain is: (i) extract mobilities and CNPs from electrical transport (Supp. Fig. S1, Fig. 2a); (ii) use those as fixed inputs to a full-wave FDTD model of the antenna-coupled graphene channel; (iii) simulate absorption vs VRG, obtaining peaks at −1.6 V and −0.6 V; (iv) compare to measured photovoltage peaks at ≈−1.2 V and ≈0.3 V. The simulation parameters are not adjusted to the photovoltage data—the CNPs are stated to come from experiment and the mobilities from transport fits. The Fabry–Pérot analysis (Eqs. 1–7 and Fig. 3) is a consistency check: the mode indices m=4 and m=2 are counted from the simulated field profiles, and the dispersion relation (Eq. 4) is evaluated at the experimentally observed resonance gate voltages, so the 'predictions' are not independent of the observed peak positions, but they are also not fitted parameters that have been renamed as predictions. The cited prior work (Refs. 26, 38, 40, 51, 53, 58) supplies standard AGP dispersion, launching, and PTE modeling tools; no load-bearing claim rests on an unverified self-citation or a uniqueness theorem. The damping values (Q≈0.8–2.0) raise a legitimate question about whether a coherent standing wave can persist over 2 µm, but that is an internal-consistency/correctness issue, not a circularity of the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim's 'prediction' content rests on a full-wave simulation whose inputs (mobilities, CNPs, n0, R0) are fitted to the same device's transport data, and a Fabry-Pérot assignment whose mode indices are read from the simulation's own field profiles. The dispersion relation and thermoelectric framework are imported from prior literature. No new entities are postulated. The honest ledger is ~6 fitted/calibrated parameters and 5 domain assumptions, with the mode-index choice being the softest input.

free parameters (6)

carrier mobilities under right gate = μ_e ≈ 1.33×10⁴, μ_h ≈ 3.7×10⁴ cm² V⁻¹ s⁻¹
Fitted to d.c. transport (SI Fig. S1a); set the AGP damping (τ = μE_F/v_F²) and the absorption/PTE simulation. Independent measurement, same device.
carrier mobilities under left gate = μ_e ≈ 1.16×10⁴, μ_h ≈ 2.7×10⁴ cm² V⁻¹ s⁻¹
Fitted to transport (SI Fig. S1b); lower than right-gate values due to fabrication disorder; controls damping asymmetry used to explain the full-vs-half cavity behavior and Q values (Q ≈ 0.8–2.0).
right-gate charge neutrality point V_RG^CNP = ≈ −2 V
Read from the resistance map (Fig. 2a); enters the gate-voltage→Fermi-energy conversion that positions the simulated resonances (−1.6 V, −0.6 V vs measured −1.2 V, +0.3 V).
left-gate charge neutrality point V_LG^CNP = ≈ −4 V
Read from the resistance map; same role as above for the left-gated region.
cavity mode indices m_(1)=4, m_(2)=2 = m = 4 (full channel), m = 2 (right sub-cavity)
Assigned from the node count of simulated field profiles (Fig. 1c), then used in Fabry-Pérot conditions (Eqs. 1, 6, 7) to 'predict' resonance frequencies near 2.5 THz — a consistency closure rather than an independent prediction.
residual carrier density n0 and contact resistance R0 = n0 ≈ 1.8×10¹¹–1.2×10¹² cm⁻²; R0 ≈ 3.3–5.5 kΩ
Fitted in the transport model (SI Eq. S1); standard characterization parameters, peripheral to the central claim.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption AGP dispersion of gated graphene, Eq. (4) (Voronin et al., ref 68)
Connects λ_p to E_F, ω, d, and permittivities; central to the Fabry-Pérot identification (Eqs. 5–7).
domain assumption Nearly ideal AGP mirror reflection at the Au contacts (used to justify Eq. 1)
Required for the full-channel FP picture; in tension with the paper's own Q ≈ 0.8 (decay length ~130 nm << 2 µm cavity).
domain assumption PTE voltage from V_PTE ∝ ∫ S(x) ∇Te(x) with S from Mott relation (Eq. 3) and Boltzmann/Onsager framework (ref 58)
Bridges simulated absorption/heating to the measured photovoltage; the absolute photovoltage is not quantitatively compared, only peak positions and trends.
domain assumption Gate-voltage→Fermi-energy conversion EF = sgn(n) ħv_F√(π|n|) with parallel-plate capacitance C_ox (ε_r ≈ 5)
Sets E_F(x) used in the dispersion and simulation; any error in C_ox or CNP directly shifts predicted resonance voltages (observed 0.4–0.9 V offsets).
domain assumption Plasmon decay via Im(q_p) = Re(q_p)/(ωτ) with τ = μE_F/v_F²
Used for Q ≈ 0.8–2.0 and the claim that resonances vanish at 130 K due to damping; other temperature mechanisms (Seebeck variation, electron-phonon cooling) are not modeled.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhanced Terahertz Photoresponse via Acoustic Plasmon Cavity Resonances in Scalable Graphene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BWILGSWC

@misc{pith2026260116604,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhanced Terahertz Photoresponse via Acoustic Plasmon Cavity Resonances in Scalable Graphene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BWILGSWC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.16604}
}

read the original abstract

Precise control and nanoscale confinement of terahertz (THz) fields are essential requirements for emerging applications in photonics, quantum technologies, wireless communications, and sensing. Here, we demonstrate a polaritonic cavity enhanced THz photoresponse in an antenna coupled device based on chemical vapor deposited (CVD) monolayer graphene. The dipole antenna lobes simultaneously serve as two gate electrodes, concentrate the impinging THz field, and efficiently launch acoustic graphene plasmons (AGPs), which drive a strong photo-thermoelectric (PTE) signal. Between 6 and 90 K, the photovoltage exhibits pronounced peaks, modulating the PTE response by up to 40\%, that we attribute to AGPs forming a Fabry P\'erot THz cavity in the full or half graphene channel. Combined full wave and transport thermal simulations accurately reproduce the gate controlled plasmon wavelength, spatial absorption profile, and the resulting nonuniform electron heating responsible for the PTE response. The lateral and vertical maximum confinement factors of the AGP wavelength relative to the incident wavelength are 165 and 4000, respectively, for frequencies from 1.83 to 2.52 THz. These results demonstrate that wafer scalable CVD graphene, without hBN encapsulation, can host coherent AGP resonances and exhibit an efficient polaritonic enhanced photoresponse under appropriate gating, antenna coupling, and AGP cavity design, opening a route to scalable, polarization and frequency selective, liquid nitrogen cooled, and low power consumption THz detection platforms based on plasmon thermoelectric transduction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.16604 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Gate- and temperature-dependent resistance, photo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. (a) Comparison between measured photovoltage (PV/fi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Power dependence of the device photoresponse at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Frequency dependence of device responsivity. (a) Ga [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

[1]

S. S. Dhillon, M. S. Vitiello, E. H. Linﬁeld, A. G. Davies, M. C. Hoﬀmann, J. Booske, C. Paoloni, M. Gen- sch, P. Weightman, G. P. Williams, E. Castro-Camus, D. R. S. Cumming, F. Simoens, I. Escorcia-Carranza, J. Grant, S. Lucyszyn, M. Kuwata-Gonokami, K. Kon- ishi, M. Koch, C. A. Schmuttenmaer, T. L. Cocker, R. Huber, A. G. Markelz, Z. D. Taylor, V. P. W...

2017
[2]

At VLG = 0 V, where the left-gated region is near its CNP, the Seebeck contrast is minimal, suppressing the overall PTE response and reducing the visibility of the AGP resonances

As the temperature increases from 6 to 130 K, the eﬀective reduction of τp inferred from experiment follows the enhanced plasmon damping ex- pected from increased phonon scattering, providing a co- herent link between the simulated plasmon losses and the measured temperature dependence. At VLG = 0 V, where the left-gated region is near its CNP, the Seebec...
[3]

X. Li, J. Li, Y. Li, A. Ozcan, and M. Jarrahi, High- throughput terahertz imaging: Progress and challenges, Light Sci. Appl. 12, 233 (2023)

2023
[4]

Continuous THERmal monitoring with wearable mid-InfraRed sensors (THERmIR)

In Fig. 4(a), we control the incident THz power by using a pair of wire-grid polarizers, where one is ﬁxed while the other is rotated to vary the transmitted inten- sity. A systematic reduction of the resonance amplitude is observed as the relative angle between the polarizers increases, resulting in lower incident power on the device. The two main resona...

2022
[5]

X. Yang, X. Zhao, K. Yang, Y. Liu, Y. Liu, W. Fu, and Y. Luo, Biomedical Applica- tions of Terahertz Spectroscopy and Imaging, Trends in Biotechnol. 34, 810 (2016)

2016
[6]

T. S. Rappaport, Y. Xing, O. Kanhere, S. Ju, A. Madanayake, S. Mandal, A. Alkhateeb, and G. C. Tri- chopoulos, Wireless Communications and Applications Above 100 GHz: Opportunities and Challenges for 6G and Beyond, IEEE Access 7, 78729 (2019)

2019
[7]

Walther, B

M. Walther, B. M. Fischer, A. Ortner, A. Bitzer, A. Thoman, and H. Helm, Chemical sensing and imaging with pulsed terahertz radiation, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 397, 1009 (2010)

2010
[8]

D. M. Mittleman, Twenty years of terahertz imaging [In- vited], Opt. Express 26, 9417 (2018)

2018

Show all 80 references

[9]

Nagatsuma, G

T. Nagatsuma, G. Ducournau, and C. C. Renaud, Ad- vances in terahertz communications accelerated by pho- tonics, Nat. Photonics 10, 371 (2016)

2016
[10]

Rieh, Introduction to Terahertz Electronics (Springer Nature, 2020)

J.-S. Rieh, Introduction to Terahertz Electronics (Springer Nature, 2020)

2020
[11]

Sengupta, T

K. Sengupta, T. Nagatsuma, and D. M. Mittleman, Terahertz integrated electronic and hybrid electronic– photonic systems, Nat. Electron. 1, 622 (2018)

2018
[12]

R. A. Lewis, A review of terahertz detectors, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 52, 433001 (2019)

2019
[13]

Freeman, E

J. Freeman, E. Linﬁeld, and A. G. Davies, Terahertz fre- quency electronics and photonics: Materials and devices, Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 383, 20230378 (2025)

2025
[14]

H.-J. Song, K. Ajito, Y. Muramoto, A. Wakatsuki, T. Na- gatsuma, and N. Kukutsu, 24 Gbit/s data transmission in 300 GHz band for future terahertz communications, Electron. Lett. 48, 953 (2012)

2012
[15]

Koenig, D

S. Koenig, D. Lopez-Diaz, J. Antes, F. Boes, R. Hen- neberger, A. Leuther, A. Tessmann, R. Schmogrow, D. Hillerkuss, R. Palmer, T. Zwick, C. Koos, W. Freude, O. Ambacher, J. Leuthold, and I. Kallfass, Wireless sub-THz communication system with high data rate, Nat. Photonics 7,...

2013
[16]

Rettich, N

F. Rettich, N. Vieweg, O. Cojocari, and A. Deninger, Field Intensity Detection of Individual Ter- ahertz Pulses at 80 MHz Repetition Rate, J. Infrared Millim. THz Waves 36, 607 (2015)

2015
[17]

Mehdi, J

I. Mehdi, J. V. Siles, C. Lee, and E. Schlecht, THz Diode Technology: Status, Prospects, and Applications, Proc. IEEE 105, 990 (2017)

2017
[18]

H. C. Liu, C. Y. Song, A. J. SpringThorpe, and J. C. Cao, Terahertz quantum-well photodetectors, Infrared Phys. Technol. 47, 169 (2005)

2005
[19]

Li, W.-J

H. Li, W.-J. Wan, Z.-Y. Tan, Z.-L. Fu, H.-X. Wang, T. Zhou, Z.-P. Li, C. Wang, X.-G. Guo, and J.- C. Cao, 6.2-GHz modulated terahertz light detec- tion using fast terahertz quantum well photodetectors, Sci. Rep. 7, 3452 (2017)

2017
[20]

A. E. Yachmenev, R. A. Khabibullin, and D. S. Pono- marev, Recent advances in THz detectors based on semi- conductor structures with quantum conﬁnement: A re- view, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 55, 193001 (2022)

2022
[21]

Bielecki, J

Z. Bielecki, J. Mikolajczyk, and J. Wojtas, A Review of Thermal Detectors of THz Radiation Operated at Room Temperature, Sensors 24, 6784 (2024)

2024
[22]

Zhang, W

W. Zhang, W. Miao, Y. Ren, K.-M. Zhou, and S.-C. Shi, Superconducting hot-electron bolometer mixers and their applications, Superconductivity 2, 100009 (2022)

2022
[23]

Vicarelli, A

L. Vicarelli, A. Tredicucci, and A. Pitanti, Micromech ani- cal Bolometers for Subterahertz Detection at Room Tem- perature, ACS Photonics 9, 360 (2022)

2022
[24]

A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009)

2009
[25]

L. A. Falkovsky, Optical properties of graphene, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 129, 012004 (2008)

2008
[26]

Zihlmann, P

S. Zihlmann, P. Makk, S. Castilla, J. Gramich, K. Thodkar, S. Caneva, R. Wang, S. Hofmann, and C. Sch¨ onenberger, Nonequilibrium properties of graphene probed by superconducting tunnel spec- troscopy, Phys. Rev. B 99, 075419 (2019)

2019
[27]

X. Cai, A. B. Sushkov, R. J. Suess, M. M. Jadidi, G. S. Jenkins, L. O. Nyakiti, R. L. Myers-Ward, S. Li, J. Yan, D. K. Gaskill, T. E. Murphy, H. D. Drew, and M. S. Fuhrer, Sensitive room-temperature terahertz de- tection via the photothermoelectric eﬀect in graphene, Nat. Nano...

2014
[28]

D. A. Bandurin, D. Svintsov, I. Gayduchenko, S. G. Xu, A. Principi, M. Moskotin, I. Tretyakov, D. Yagodkin, S. Zhukov, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, I. V. Grigorieva, M. Polini, G. N. Goltsman, A. K. Geim, and G. Fedorov, Resonant terahertz detection using graphene plasmons, Nat....

2018
[29]

Castilla, B

S. Castilla, B. Terr´ es, M. Autore, L. Viti, J. Li, A. Y. Nikitin, I. Vangelidis, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Li- dorikis, M. S. Vitiello, R. Hillenbrand, K.-J. Tielrooij, and F. H. Koppens, Fast and Sensitive Terahertz Detec- tion Using an Antenna-Integrated Graphene pn Ju...

2019
[30]

Ludwig, A

F. Ludwig, A. Generalov, J. Holstein, A. Murros, K. Vi- isanen, M. Prunnila, and H. G. Roskos, Terahertz De- tection with Graphene FETs: Photothermoelectric and Resistive Self-Mixing Contributions to the Detector Re- sponse, ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 6, 2197 (2024)

2024
[31]

Vicarelli, M

L. Vicarelli, M. S. Vitiello, D. Coquillat, A. Lom- bardo, A. C. Ferrari, W. Knap, M. Polini, V. Pelle- grini, and A. Tredicucci, Graphene ﬁeld-eﬀect tran- sistors as room-temperature terahertz detectors, Nat. Mater. 11, 865 (2012)

2012
[32]

Soltani, F

A. Soltani, F. Kuschewski, and M. e. a. Bonmann, Direct nanoscopic observation of plasma waves in the channel of a graphene ﬁeld-eﬀect transistor., Light Sci Appl 9, 10.1038/s41377-020-0321-0 (2020)

2020 doi
[33]

Auton, D

G. Auton, D. B. But, J. Zhang, E. Hill, D. Co- quillat, C. Consejo, P. Nouvel, W. Knap, L. Varani, F. Teppe, J. Torres, and A. Song, Terahertz Detec- tion and Imaging Using Graphene Ballistic Rectiﬁers, Nano Lett. 17, 7015 (2017)

2017
[34]

Gayduchenko, S

I. Gayduchenko, S. G. Xu, G. Alymov, M. Moskotin, I. Tretyakov, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, G. Goltsman, A. K. Geim, G. Fedorov, D. Svintsov, and D. A. Ban- durin, Tunnel ﬁeld-eﬀect transistors for sensitive tera- 14 hertz detection, Nat. Commun. 12, 543 (2021)

2021
[35]

D. A. Mylnikov, E. I. Titova, M. A. Kashchenko, I. V. Safonov, S. S. Zhukov, V. A. Semkin, K. S. Novoselov, D. A. Bandurin, and D. A. Svintsov, Ter- ahertz Photoconductivity in Bilayer Graphene Transis- tors: Evidence for Tunneling at Gate-Induced Junctions, Nano Lett. 23, 220 (2023)

2023
[36]

L. Viti, A. R. Cadore, X. Yang, A. Vorobiev, J. E. Muench, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Stake, A. C. Ferrari, and M. S. Vitiello, Thermoelectric graphene pho- todetectors with sub-nanosecond response times at tera- hertz frequencies, Nanophotonics 10, 89 (2021)

2021
[37]

Agarwal, K

H. Agarwal, K. Nowakowski, A. Forrer, A. Prin- cipi, R. Bertini, S. Batlle-Porro, A. Reserbat-Plantey, P. Prasad, L. Vistoli, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Bachtold, G. Scalari, R. Krishna Kumar, and F. H. L. Koppens, Ultra-broadband photoconductivity in twisted graphene heter...

2023
[38]

C. Liu, L. Du, W. Tang, D. Wei, J. Li, L. Wang, G. Chen, X. Chen, and W. Lu, Towards sensitive terahertz de- tection via thermoelectric manipulation using graphene transistors, NPG Asia Mater. 10, 318 (2018)

2018
[39]

A. N. Grigorenko, M. Polini, and K. S. Novoselov, Graphene plasmonics, Nat. Photonics 6, 749 (2012)

2012
[40]

Castilla, H

S. Castilla, H. Agarwal, I. Vangelidis, Y. V. Bludov, D. A. Iranzo, A. Grabulosa, M. Ceccanti, M. I. Vasilevskiy, R. K. Kumar, E. Janzen, J. H. Edgar, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, N. M. R. Peres, E. Lidorikis, and F. H. L. Koppens, Electrical spectroscopy of polaritonic nanores-...

2024
[41]

S. Dai, Z. Fei, Q. Ma, A. S. Rodin, M. Wagner, A. S. McLeod, M. K. Liu, W. Gannett, W. Regan, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, M. Thiemens, G. Dominguez, A. H. C. Neto, A. Zettl, F. Keilmann, P. Jarillo-Herrero, M. M. Fogler, and D. N. Basov, Tunable Phonon Polaritons in Atomicall...

2014
[42]

Castilla, I

S. Castilla, I. Vangelidis, V.-V. Pusapati, J. Gold- stein, M. Autore, T. Slipchenko, K. Rajendran, S. Kim, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Mart ´in-Moreno, D. Englund, K.-J. Tielrooij, R. Hillenbrand, E. Li- dorikis, and F. H. L. Koppens, Plasmonic antenna coupling to hyperboli...

2020
[43]

X. Xie, Q. Li, C. Liu, Y. Liu, C. Lee, K. Sun, and H. Deng, 2D material exciton-polariton transport on 2D photonic crystals, Sci. Adv. 11, eads0231 (2025)

2025
[44]

F. J. G. de Abajo, D. N. Basov, F. H. L. Kop- pens, L. Orsini, M. Ceccanti, S. Castilla, L. Cavicchi, and et al., Roadmap for photonics with 2d materials, ACS Photonics 12, 3961 (2025)

2025
[45]

Lazzari, J

R. Lazzari, J. Jupille, R. Cavallotti, E. Cherny- sheva, S. Castilla, M. Messaykeh, Q. H´ erault, I. Gozhyk, and E. Meriggio, Plasmonics of sup- ported nanoparticles reveals adhesion at the nanoscale: Implications for metals on dielectrics, ACS Applied Nano Materials 3, 12157 (2020)

2020
[46]

D. N. Basov, M. M. Fogler, and F. J. Garc ´ia de Abajo, Polaritons in van der Waals materials, Science 354, aag1992 (2016)

2016
[47]

T. Low, A. Chaves, J. D. Caldwell, A. Kumar, N. X. Fang, P. A vouris, T. F. Heinz, F. Guinea, L. Martin- Moreno, and F. Koppens, Polaritons in layered two- dimensional materials, Nat. Mater. 16, 182 (2017)

2017
[48]

Principi, R

A. Principi, R. Asgari, and M. Polini, Acous- tic plasmons and composite hole-acoustic plas- mon satellite bands in graphene on a metal gate, Solid State Commun. 151, 1627 (2011)

2011
[49]

Alcaraz Iranzo, S

D. Alcaraz Iranzo, S. Nanot, E. J. C. Dias, I. Epstein, C. Peng, D. K. Efetov, M. B. Lundeberg, R. Parret, J. Osmond, J.-Y. Hong, J. Kong, D. R. Englund, N. M. R. Peres, and F. H. L. Koppens, Probing the ultimate plas- mon conﬁnement limits with a van der Waals heterostruc- tu...

2018
[50]

Epstein, D

I. Epstein, D. Alcaraz, Z. Huang, V.-V. Pusapati, J.-P. Hugonin, A. Kumar, X. M. Deputy, T. Khodkov, T. G. Rappoport, J.-Y. Hong, N. M. R. Peres, J. Kong, D. R. Smith, and F. H. L. Koppens, Far-ﬁeld excitation of single graphene plasmon cavities with ultracompressed mode volum...

2020
[51]

Barcons Ruiz, N

D. Barcons Ruiz, N. C. Hesp, H. Herzig Sheinfux, C. Ramos Marim´ on, C. M. Maissen, A. Principi, R. As- gari, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. Polini, R. Hillen- brand, I. Torre, and F. H. Koppens, Experimental signa- tures of the transition from acoustic plasmon to electronic so...

2023
[52]

X. Cai, A. B. Sushkov, M. M. Jadidi, L. O. Nyakiti, R. L. Myers-Ward, D. K. Gaskill, T. E. Murphy, M. S. Fuhrer, and H. D. Drew, Plasmon-Enhanced Terahertz Photode- tection in Graphene, Nano Lett. 15, 4295 (2015)

2015
[53]

Alonso-Gonz´ alez, A

P. Alonso-Gonz´ alez, A. Y. Nikitin, Y. Gao, A. Woessner , M. B. Lundeberg, A. Principi, N. Forcellini, W. Yan, S. V´ elez, A. J. Huber, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, F. Casanova, L. E. Hueso, M. Polini, J. Hone, F. H. L. Koppens, and R. Hillenbrand, Acoustic terahertz graphene p...

2017
[54]

J. M. Caridad, ´O. Castell´ o, S. M. L´ opez Baptista, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, H. G. Roskos, and J. A. Delgado-Notario, Room-Temperature Plasmon-Assisted Resonant THz Detection in Single-Layer Graphene Tran- sistors, Nano Lett. 24, 935 (2024)

2024
[55]

I.-H. Lee, D. Yoo, P. A vouris, T. Low, and S.-H. Oh, Graphene acoustic plasmon resonator for ultrasensitive infrared spectroscopy, Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 313 (2019)

2019
[56]

Z. M. Gebeyehu, V. Miˇ seikis, S. Forti, A. Rossi, N. Mishra, A. Boschi, Y. P. Ivanov, L. Mar- tini, M. W. Ochapski, G. Piccinini, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Divitini, F. Beltram, S. Pezzini, and C. Coletti, Decoupled High-Mobility Graphene on Cu(111)/Sapphire via Chemical ...

2024
[57]

X. Li, G. Wu, L. Zhang, D. Huang, Y. Li, R. Zhang, M. Li, L. Zhu, J. Guo, T. Huang, J. Shen, X. Wei, K. M. Yu, J. Dong, M. S. Altman, R. S. Ruoﬀ, Y. Duan, J. Yu, Z. Wang, X. Huang, F. Ding, H. Shi, and W. Tang, Single-crystal two-dimensional mate- rial epitaxy on tailored non-...

2022
[58]

J. L. Garcia-Pomar, A. Y. Nikitin, and L. Martin- Moreno, Scattering of Graphene Plasmons by Defects in the Graphene Sheet, ACS Nano 7, 4988 (2013)

2013
[59]

Y. M. Zuev, W. Chang, and P. Kim, Thermoelectric and Magnetothermoelectric Transport Measurements of Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 096807 (2009) . 15

2009
[60]

Vangelidis, D

I. Vangelidis, D. V. Bellas, S. Suckow, G. Da- bos, S. Castilla, F. H. L. Koppens, A. C. Ferrari, N. Pleros, and E. Lidorikis, Unbiased Plasmonic- Assisted Integrated Graphene Photodetectors, ACS Photonics 9, 1992 (2022)

1992
[61]

J. Duan, X. Wang, X. Lai, G. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Zebarjadi, and E. Y. Andrei, High thermoelectricpower factor in graphene/hBN devices, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 14272 (2016)

2016
[62]

Bylinkin, S

A. Bylinkin, S. Castilla, T. M. Slipchenko, K. Domina, F. Calavalle, V.-V. Pusapati, M. Autore, F. Casanova, L. E. Hueso, L. Mart ´in-Moreno, A. Y. Nikitin, F. H. L. Koppens, and R. Hillenbrand, On-chip phonon- enhanced IR near-ﬁeld detection of molecular vibrations, Nat. Comm...

2024
[63]

Riazimehr, A

S. Riazimehr, A. Esteki, M. Otto, M. Powell, G. Rinke, B. Robertz, Z. Wang, M. C. Lemme, K. Hore, and H. Knoops, Plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition of Al2O3 on graphene via an in situ -deposited interlayer, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process 199, 109829 (2025)

2025
[64]

N. M. Gabor, J. C. W. Song, Q. Ma, N. L. Nair, T. Tay- chatanapat, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. S. Levi- tov, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Hot Carrier–Assisted Intrin- sic Photoresponse in Graphene, Science 334, 648 (2011)

2011
[65]

M. C. Lemme, F. H. L. Koppens, A. L. Falk, M. S. Rud- ner, H. Park, L. S. Levitov, and C. M. Marcus, Gate- Activated Photoresponse in a Graphene p–n Junction, Nano Lett. 11, 4134 (2011)

2011
[66]

F. H. L. Koppens, D. E. Chang, and F. J. Garc ´ia de Abajo, Graphene Plasmonics: A Platform for Strong Light–Matter Interactions, Nano Lett. 11, 3370 (2011)

2011
[67]

G. X. Ni, A. S. McLeod, Z. Sun, L. Wang, L. Xiong, K. W. Post, S. S. Sunku, B.-Y. Jiang, J. Hone, C. R. Dean, M. M. Fogler, and D. N. Basov, Fundamental lim- its to graphene plasmonics, Nature 557, 530 (2018)

2018
[68]

E. H. Hwang and S. Das Sarma, Acoustic phonon scatter- ing limited carrier mobility in two-dimensional extrinsic graphene, Phys. Rev. B 77, 115449 (2008)

2008
[69]

Principi, G

A. Principi, G. Vignale, M. Carrega, and M. Polini, Intrinsic lifetime of Dirac plasmons in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 88, 195405 (2013)

2013
[70]

K. V. Voronin, U. A. Aguirreche, R. Hillenbrand, V. S. Volkov, P. Alonso-Gonz´ alez, and A. Y. Nikitin, Nanofocusing of acoustic graphene plasmon polari- tons for enhancing mid-infrared molecular ﬁngerprints, Nanophotonics 9, 2089 (2020)
[71]

C. Gao, Z. Zheng, S. Ke, B. Guan, and Q. He, Optical– dielectric characterization and contactless thickness me a- surement of ceramics based on terahertz spectroscopy, Appl. Opt. 64, 5302 (2025)

2025
[72]

X. Li, W. Cai, J. An, S. Kim, J. Nah, D. Yang, R. Piner, A. Velamakanni, I. Jung, E. Tutuc, S. K. Banerjee, L. Colombo, and R. S. Ruoﬀ, Large-Area Synthesis of High-Quality and Uniform Graphene Films on Copper Foils, Science 324, 1312 (2009)

2009
[73]

S. Bae, H. Kim, Y. Lee, X. Xu, J.-S. Park, Y. Zheng, J. Balakrishnan, T. Lei, H. Ri Kim, Y. I. Song, Y.-J. Kim, K. S. Kim, B. ¨Ozyilmaz, J.-H. Ahn, B. H. Hong, and S. Iijima, Roll-to-roll production of 30-inch graphene ﬁlms for transparent electrodes, Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 574 (2010)

2010
[74]

Kolodzey, E

J. Kolodzey, E. Chowdhury, T. Adam, G. Qui, I. Rau, J. Olowolafe, J. Suehle, and Y. Chen, Electrical conduction and dielectric break- down in aluminum oxide insulators on silicon, IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 47, 121 (2000)

2000
[75]

A. A. Lagatsky, Z. Sun, T. S. Kulmala, R. S. Sundaram, S. Milana, F. Torrisi, O. L. Antipov, Y. Lee, J. H. Ahn, C. T. A. Brown, W. Sibbett, and A. C. Ferrari, 2 µm solid-state laser mode-locked by single-layer graphene, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 013113 (2013)

2013
[76]

A. C. Ferrari, J. C. Meyer, V. Scardaci, C. Casir- aghi, M. Lazzeri, F. Mauri, S. Piscanec, D. Jiang, K. S. Novoselov, S. Roth, and A. K. Geim, Ra- man Spectrum of Graphene and Graphene Layers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 187401 (2006)

2006
[77]

A. C. Ferrari and D. M. Basko, Raman spectroscopy as a versatile tool for studying the properties of graphene, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 235 (2013)

2013
[78]

A. Das, S. Pisana, B. Chakraborty, S. Piscanec, S. K. Saha, U. V. Waghmare, K. S. Novoselov, H. R. Krishnamurthy, A. K. Geim, A. C. Ferrari, and A. K. Sood, Monitoring dopants by Raman scattering in an electrochemically top-gated graphene transistor, Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 210 (2008)

2008
[79]

D. M. Basko, S. Piscanec, and A. C. Ferrari, Electron-electron interactions and doping dependence of the two-phonon Raman intensity in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 80, 165413 (2009)

2009
[80]

L. G. Can¸ cado, A. Jorio, E. H. M. Ferreira, F. Stavale, C. A. Achete, R. B. Capaz, M. V. O. Moutinho, A. Lom- bardo, T. S. Kulmala, and A. C. Ferrari, Quantifying De- fects in Graphene via Raman Spectroscopy at Diﬀerent Excitation Energies, Nano Lett. 11, 3190 (2011) . S1 SU...

2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

S. S. Dhillon, M. S. Vitiello, E. H. Linﬁeld, A. G. Davies, M. C. Hoﬀmann, J. Booske, C. Paoloni, M. Gen- sch, P. Weightman, G. P. Williams, E. Castro-Camus, D. R. S. Cumming, F. Simoens, I. Escorcia-Carranza, J. Grant, S. Lucyszyn, M. Kuwata-Gonokami, K. Kon- ishi, M. Koch, C. A. Schmuttenmaer, T. L. Cocker, R. Huber, A. G. Markelz, Z. D. Taylor, V. P. W...

2017

[2] [2]

At VLG = 0 V, where the left-gated region is near its CNP, the Seebeck contrast is minimal, suppressing the overall PTE response and reducing the visibility of the AGP resonances

As the temperature increases from 6 to 130 K, the eﬀective reduction of τp inferred from experiment follows the enhanced plasmon damping ex- pected from increased phonon scattering, providing a co- herent link between the simulated plasmon losses and the measured temperature dependence. At VLG = 0 V, where the left-gated region is near its CNP, the Seebec...

[3] [3]

X. Li, J. Li, Y. Li, A. Ozcan, and M. Jarrahi, High- throughput terahertz imaging: Progress and challenges, Light Sci. Appl. 12, 233 (2023)

2023

[4] [4]

Continuous THERmal monitoring with wearable mid-InfraRed sensors (THERmIR)

In Fig. 4(a), we control the incident THz power by using a pair of wire-grid polarizers, where one is ﬁxed while the other is rotated to vary the transmitted inten- sity. A systematic reduction of the resonance amplitude is observed as the relative angle between the polarizers increases, resulting in lower incident power on the device. The two main resona...

2022

[5] [5]

X. Yang, X. Zhao, K. Yang, Y. Liu, Y. Liu, W. Fu, and Y. Luo, Biomedical Applica- tions of Terahertz Spectroscopy and Imaging, Trends in Biotechnol. 34, 810 (2016)

2016

[6] [6]

T. S. Rappaport, Y. Xing, O. Kanhere, S. Ju, A. Madanayake, S. Mandal, A. Alkhateeb, and G. C. Tri- chopoulos, Wireless Communications and Applications Above 100 GHz: Opportunities and Challenges for 6G and Beyond, IEEE Access 7, 78729 (2019)

2019

[7] [7]

Walther, B

M. Walther, B. M. Fischer, A. Ortner, A. Bitzer, A. Thoman, and H. Helm, Chemical sensing and imaging with pulsed terahertz radiation, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 397, 1009 (2010)

2010

[8] [8]

D. M. Mittleman, Twenty years of terahertz imaging [In- vited], Opt. Express 26, 9417 (2018)

2018