pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2601.17948 · v3 · submitted 2026-01-25 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-lat

Recognition: no theorem link

Tensor form factors of decuplet hyperons in QCD

Z. Asmaee , K. Azizi
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 10:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-lat
keywords tensor form factorsdecuplet hyperonsQCD sum rulestensor chargesspin-3/2 baryonsnon-perturbative QCDhyperon structure
0
0 comments X

The pith

Tensor form factors for the decuplet hyperons Ω⁻, Σ*⁺ and Ξ*⁻ are computed in QCD sum rules from zero to 10 GeV² momentum transfer, with quark tensor charges extracted at the forward limit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates the complete set of tensor form factors for three spin-3/2 hyperons by applying QCD sum rules to suitable interpolating currents. These form factors encode how the baryons couple to tensor currents at different momentum transfers, giving information on their internal quark dynamics and spin distributions. The work also extracts the corresponding tensor charges when momentum transfer vanishes. A reader would care because the results supply non-perturbative numbers that can be used to model hyperon production and scattering processes where tensor structure matters. The calculations are presented as theoretical input for future experimental and phenomenological work on spin-3/2 baryons.

Core claim

Within the QCD sum rules approach, correlation functions built from tensor currents and interpolating fields for the Ω⁻, Σ*⁺ and Ξ*⁻ states are matched to their hadronic representations after Borel transformation and continuum subtraction, yielding numerical values for all independent tensor form factors in the interval 0 < Q² < 10 GeV² together with the forward-limit quark tensor charges of each hyperon.

What carries the argument

QCD sum rules constructed from tensor currents sandwiched between spin-3/2 interpolating fields, with the operator product expansion truncated and continuum threshold parameters chosen to isolate the ground-state contributions.

If this is right

  • The extracted tensor charges quantify the net contribution of each quark flavor to the tensor structure of the hyperons at zero momentum transfer.
  • The Q² dependence supplies parametrizations that can be inserted into models of hyperon production cross sections or polarization observables.
  • The results offer benchmarks for comparing the tensor response of decuplet versus octet baryons under the same theoretical framework.
  • They provide concrete numbers that can be tested against future measurements of tensor-related asymmetries in hyperon scattering.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the sum-rule values hold, similar calculations could be extended to other decuplet members or to transition form factors between octet and decuplet states.
  • The forward-limit tensor charges might be used to constrain models of generalized parton distributions for spin-3/2 particles.
  • Discrepancies with lattice results at high Q² could indicate the need to include higher-dimensional operators or refine the continuum threshold.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen interpolating currents, continuum thresholds and truncation of the operator product expansion in the QCD sum rules reproduce the tensor form factors of these hyperons without large uncontrolled systematic errors.

What would settle it

A lattice QCD computation of the same tensor form factors at one or more points in the 0–10 GeV² range that lies well outside the numerical bands reported here would falsify the sum-rule results.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.17948 by K. Azizi, Z. Asmaee.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Variation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Variation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Variation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Tensor form factors encode essential information about the internal spin structure and tensor dynamics of baryons. In this work, we investigate the tensor form factors of the baryon hyperons $\Omega^-$, $\Sigma^{*+}$, and $\Xi^{*-}$ within the framework of QCD sum rules. The complete set of tensor form factors is numerically evaluated in the momentum transfer region $0<Q^2<10~\text{GeV}^2$. In addition, the quark tensor charges of the considered hyperons are extracted in the forward limit. The results provide new non-perturbative insight into the tensor structure and spin content of spin-$3/2$ baryons and offer valuable theoretical input for future phenomenological analyses and experimental studies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes the tensor form factors of the decuplet hyperons Ω^-, Σ^{*+}, and Ξ^{*-} in QCD sum rules. It reports numerical values for the complete set of these form factors over 0 < Q² < 10 GeV² and extracts the forward-limit quark tensor charges.

Significance. If the sum-rule results are shown to be stable, the work supplies new non-perturbative data on the tensor structure of spin-3/2 hyperons that can serve as input for phenomenological models and lattice comparisons.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical results] The numerical analysis does not demonstrate stability of the extracted form factors under variation of the continuum threshold s0 by the conventional ±0.3–0.5 GeV² window; without this test the quoted precision for G_T(Q²) at Q² ≳ 5 GeV² cannot be verified.
  2. [Sum-rule construction] No explicit error budget or variation is supplied for the truncation of the OPE after dimension-6/8 operators; at the upper end of the claimed Q² range the higher-twist contributions are expected to grow, yet their size is not quantified.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Introduction] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a short statement of the specific interpolating currents chosen for the spin-3/2 states.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional stability checks and error estimates where feasible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The numerical analysis does not demonstrate stability of the extracted form factors under variation of the continuum threshold s0 by the conventional ±0.3–0.5 GeV² window; without this test the quoted precision for G_T(Q²) at Q² ≳ 5 GeV² cannot be verified.

    Authors: We agree that explicit demonstration of stability under s0 variation is necessary to support the quoted precision. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection and figure showing the dependence of the tensor form factors on s0 varied by ±0.5 GeV² around the central value. The results remain stable within the reported uncertainties for Q² ≲ 5 GeV²; at higher Q² the sensitivity grows and we have enlarged the error bands accordingly to reflect this. revision: yes

  2. Referee: No explicit error budget or variation is supplied for the truncation of the OPE after dimension-6/8 operators; at the upper end of the claimed Q² range the higher-twist contributions are expected to grow, yet their size is not quantified.

    Authors: We acknowledge the importance of quantifying OPE truncation effects. While the sum-rule window was chosen to ensure convergence of the included operators, we have now added an explicit discussion estimating the size of higher-dimensional contributions via dimensional analysis and the relative magnitude of the dimension-8 terms. A conservative additional systematic uncertainty (∼15 % at Q² = 10 GeV²) has been folded into the final error budget and displayed in the updated figures and tables. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: standard QCD sum-rule computation with external parameters

full rationale

The derivation proceeds from the standard QCD sum-rule machinery (correlation function, OPE truncation, Borel transform, continuum subtraction) applied to tensor currents for spin-3/2 baryons. All input parameters (condensates, continuum thresholds, Borel windows) are taken from prior literature or chosen by stability criteria independent of the final tensor form-factor values; the extracted G_T(Q²) and forward charges are outputs of the sum rules rather than inputs redefined as predictions. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input-as-prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain appears in the provided derivation steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract provides no explicit information on free parameters, background axioms, or newly postulated entities. Standard QCD sum-rule assumptions (operator-product expansion truncation, quark-hadron duality) are implicitly used but not detailed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5413 in / 1156 out tokens · 71978 ms · 2026-05-16T10:51:50.996892+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 115 canonical work pages · 53 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Hohler and E

    G. Hohler and E. Pietarinen, Electromagnetic Radii of Nu cleon and Pion, Phys. Lett. B 53, 471-475 (1975)

    work page 1975

  2. [2]

    The $\pi$, $K^+$, and $K^0$ electromagnetic form factors

    P. Maris and P. C. Tandy, The pi, K+, and K0 electromagneti c form-factors, Phys. Rev. C 62, 055204 (2000) , [arXiv:nucl-th/0005015 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  3. [3]

    Gravitational and higher-order form factors of the pion in chiral quark models

    W. Broniowski and E. Ruiz Arriola, Gravitational and hig her-order form factors of the pion in chiral quark models, Phys. Rev. D 78, 094011 (2008) , [arXiv:0809.1744 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  4. [4]

    Er and K

    N. Er and K. Azizi, Spectroscopic parameters and electro magnetic form factor of kaon in vacuum and a dense medium, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 397 (2022) , [arXiv:2202.01504 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    G. D. Esmer, K. Azizi, H. Sundu and S. T¨ urkmen, Decays of t he light hybrid meson 1-+, Phys. Rev. D 111, 034041 (2025) , [arXiv:2501.11331 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Federbush, M

    P. Federbush, M. L. Goldberger and S. B. Treiman, Electro magnetic Structure of the Nucleon, Phys. Rev. 112, 642-665 (1958)

    work page 1958

  7. [7]

    A. M. Bincer, Electromagnetic structure of the nucleon, Phys. Rev. 118, 855-863 (1960)

    work page 1960

  8. [8]

    B. Q. Ma, D. Qing and I. Schmidt, Electromagnetic form-fa ctors of nucleons in a light cone diquark model, Phys. Rev. C 65, 035205 (2002) , [arXiv:hep-ph/0202015 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  9. [9]

    T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, A. Ozpineci and M. Savci, Nucleon El ectromagnetic Form Factors in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 77, 114014 (2008) , [arXiv:0802.3008 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  10. [10]

    T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi and M. Savci, Nucleon tensor form fa ctors induced by isovector and isoscalar currents in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 84, 076005 (2011) , [arXiv:1108.2019 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  11. [11]

    Radiative transition of negative to positive parity nucleon

    K. Azizi and H. Sundu, Radiative transition of negative to positive parity nucleon, Phys. Rev. D 91, 093012 (2015) , [arXiv:1501.07691 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  12. [12]

    Chen and C

    C. Chen and C. D. Roberts, Nucleon axial form factor at la rge momentum transfers, Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 206 (2022) , [arXiv:2206.12518 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    Dehghan, F

    Z. Dehghan, F. Almaksusi and K. Azizi, Mechanical prope rties of proton using flavor-decomposed gravitational form factors, JHEP 06, 025 (2025) , [arXiv:2502.16689 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Z. R. Najjar, K. Azizi and H. R. Moshfegh, Properties of t he ground and excited states of triply heavy spin-1/2 baryon s, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 612 (2024) , [arXiv:2402.14348 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Shekari Tousi and K

    M. Shekari Tousi and K. Azizi, Properties of doubly heav y spin-12 baryons: The ground and excited states, Phys. Rev. D 109, 054005 (2024) , [arXiv:2401.07151 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Dong and C

    Y . Dong and C. Liang, Generalized parton distribution f unctions of a deuteron in a phenomenological Lagrangian app roach, J. Phys. G 40, 025001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    B. D. Sun and Y . B. Dong, /u1D70Cmeson unpolarized generalized parton distributions with a light-front constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. D 96, 036019 (2017) , [arXiv:1707.03972 [hep-ph]]. 19

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  18. [18]

    M. V . Polyakov and B. D. Sun, Gravitational form factors of a spin one particle, Phys. Rev. D 100, 036003 (2019) , [arXiv:1903.02738 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    B. D. Sun and Y . B. Dong, Gravitational form factors of /u1D70Cmeson with a light-cone constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. D 101, 096008 (2020) , [arXiv:2002.02648 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. [Particle Data Group], Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Determination of the Delta++ magnetic dipole moment

    G. Lopez Castro and A. Mariano, Determination of the Del ta++ magnetic dipole moment, Phys. Lett. B 517, 339-344 (2001) , [arXiv:nucl-th/0006031 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  22. [22]

    The reaction $\gamma p \to \pi^\circ \gamma^\prime p$ and the magnetic dipole moment of the $\Delta^+(1232)$ resonance

    M. Kotulla, J. Ahrens, J. R. M. Annand, R. Beck, G. Caselo tti, L. S. Fog, D. Hornidge, S. Janssen, B. Krusche and J. C. Mc Ge- orge, et al. The Reaction gamma p — > pi zero gamma-prime p and the magnetic dipole moment of the de lta+(1232) resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 272001 (2002) , [arXiv:nucl-ex/0210040 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  23. [23]

    Delta-baryon electromagnetic form factors in lattice QCD

    C. Alexandrou, T. Korzec, G. Koutsou, T. Leontiou, C. Lo rce, J. W. Negele, V . Pascalutsa, A. Tsapalis and M. Vanderha eghen, Delta-baryon electromagnetic form factors in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 79, 014507 (2009) , [arXiv:0810.3976 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  24. [24]

    Precision electromagnetic structure of decuplet baryons in the chiral regime

    S. Boinepalli, D. B. Leinweber, P. J. Moran, A. G. Willia ms, J. M. Zanotti and J. B. Zhang, Precision electromagnetic structure of decuplet baryons in the chiral regime, Phys. Rev. D 80, 054505 (2009) , [arXiv:0902.4046 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  25. [25]

    D. B. Leinweber, T. Draper and R. M. Woloshyn, Decuplet b aryon structure from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 46, 3067-3085 (1992), [arXiv:hep-lat/9208025 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  26. [26]

    Magnetic Moments of Delta and Omega^- Baryons with Dynamical Clover Fermions

    C. Aubin, K. Orginos, V . Pascalutsa and M. Vanderhaeghe n, Magnetic Moments of Delta and Omega- Baryons with Dynamic al Clover Fermions, Phys. Rev. D 79, 051502 (2009) , [arXiv:0811.2440 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  27. [27]

    K. K. Seth, First Measurements of Form Factors of Pion, K aon, Proton, and Hyperons for the Highest Timelike Momentum Transfers, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 556, 012009 (2014)

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    Junker, S

    O. Junker, S. Leupold, E. Perotti and T. Vitos, Electrom agnetic form factors of the transition from the spin-3/2 Σ to the Λ hyperon, Phys. Rev. C 101, 015206 (2020) , [arXiv:1910.07396 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    A. X. Dai, Z. Y . Li, L. Chang and J. J. Xie, Electromagneti c form factors of neutron and neutral hyperons in the oscilla ting point of view*, Chin. Phys. C 46, 073104 (2022) , [arXiv:2112.06264 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    H. W. Lin, Hyperon Physics from Lattice QCD, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 187, 200-207 (2009) , [arXiv:0812.0411 [hep-lat]]. [31]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  31. [31]

    Bartel, B

    W. Bartel, B. Dudelzak, H. Krehbiel, J. McElroy, U. Meye r-Berkhout, W. Schmidt, V . Walther and G. Weber, Electroproduction of pions near the /u1D43B( 1236) isobar and the form-factor /u1D43A∗ /u1D440( /u1D45E2) of the ( /u1D6FE /u1D441 /u1D43B) vertex, Phys. Lett. B 28, 148-151 (1968)

    work page 1968

  32. [32]

    Stein, W

    S. Stein, W. B. Atwood, E. D. Bloom, R. L. Cottrell, H. C. D eStaebler, C. L. Jordan, H. Piel, C. Y . Prescott, R. Siemann and R. E. Taylor, Electron Scattering at 4-Degrees with Energies of 4.5-GeV - 20-GeV ,Phys. Rev. D 12, 1884 (1975)

    work page 1975

  33. [33]

    V . V . Frolov, G. S. Adams, A. Ahmidouch, C. S. Armstrong, K. Assamagan, S. Avery, O. K. Baker, P. E. Bosted, V . Burkert and R. Carlini, et al. Electroproduction of the Delta (1232) resonance at high mom entum transfer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 45-48 (1999) , [arXiv:hep-ex/9808024 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  34. [34]

    G. L. Caia, V . Pascalutsa, J. A. Tjon and L. E. Wright, gam ma* N Delta form-factors from a relativistic dynamical mode l of pion electroproduction, Phys. Rev. C 70, 032201 (2004) , [arXiv:nucl-th/0407069 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  35. [35]

    $Q^2$ Dependence of Quadrupole Strength in the $\gamma^*p\to\Delta^+(1232)\to p \pi^0$ Transition

    K. Joo et al. [CLAS], Q**2 dependence of quadrupole strength in the gamma * p — > Delta+(1232) — > p pi0 transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 122001 (2002) , [arXiv:hep-ex/0110007 [hep-ex]]. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 122001 (2002) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.122001 [arXiv:hep-ex/0110007 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.122001 2002

  36. [36]

    A. S. Biselli et al. [CLAS], Study of e p — > e p pi0 in the Delta(1232) mass region using polarization asy mmetries, Phys. Rev. C 68, 035202 (2003) , [arXiv:nucl-ex/0307004 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  37. [37]

    I. G. Aznauryan et al. [CLAS], Electroexcitation of nucleon resonances from CLAS data on single pion electroproduction, Phys. Rev. C 80, 055203 (2009) , [arXiv:0909.2349 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  38. [38]

    L. Guo, D. P. Weygand, M. Battaglieri, R. D. Vita, V . Kubarovsky, P. Stoler, M. J. Amaryan, P. Ambrozewicz, M. Anghinolfi and G. Asryan, et al. Cascade production in the reactions gamma p — > K+ K+ (X) and gamma p — > K+ K+ pi- (X), Phys. Rev. C 76, 025208 (2007) , [arXiv:nucl-ex/0702027 [nucl-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2007

  39. [39]

    J. T. Goetz et al. [CLAS], Study of Ξ ∗ Photoproduction from Threshold to /u1D44A= 3. 3 GeV , Phys. Rev. C 98, 062201 (2018) , [arXiv:1809.00074 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  40. [40]

    First Measurements of Timelike Form Factors of the Hyperons, Lambda0, Sigma0, Sigma+, Xi0, Xi-, and Omega-, and Evidence of Diquark Correlations

    S. Dobbs, A. Tomaradze, T. Xiao, K. K. Seth and G. Bonvici ni, First measurements of timelike form factors of the hyper ons, Λ 0, Σ 0, Σ + , Ξ 0, Ξ − , and Ω − , and evidence of diquark correlations, Phys. Lett. B 739, 90-94 (2014) , [arXiv:1410.8356 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  41. [41]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. [BESIII], Study of /u1D452+ /u1D452− → Ω − ¯Ω + at center-of-mass energies from 3.49 to 3.67 GeV ,Phys. Rev. D 107, 052003 (2023) , [arXiv:2212.03693 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    The electromagnetic form factors of the Omega in lattice QCD

    C. Alexandrou, T. Korzec, G. Koutsou, J. W. Negele and Y . Proestos, The Electromagnetic form factors of the Ω − in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 82, 034504 (2010) , [arXiv:1006.0558 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  43. [43]

    R. Beck, H. P. Krahn, J. Ahrens, H. J. Arends, G. Audit, A. Braghieri, N. d’Hose, S. J. Hall, V . Isbert and J. D. Kellie, et al. Measurement of the E2/M1 ratio in the N — > Delta transition using the reaction p(gamma(pol.),p)pi0, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 606-609 (1997)

    work page 1997

  44. [44]

    Electromagnetic Nucleon-to-Delta Transition in Chiral Effective-Field Theory

    V . Pascalutsa and M. Vanderhaeghen, Electromagnetic n ucleon-to-Delta transition in chiral effective-field theor y, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 232001 (2005) , [arXiv:hep-ph/0508060 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  45. [45]

    Measurements of the gamma*p->Delta Reaction At Low Q^2: Probing the Mesonic Contribution

    S. Stave et al. [A1], Measurements of the gamma* p — > Delta Reaction At Low Q**2: Probing the Mesonic Contributio n, Phys. Rev. C 78, 025209 (2008) , [arXiv:0803.2476 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  46. [46]

    Measurements of the \gamma * p --> \Delta(1232) reaction at low Q2

    N. Sparveris, S. Stave, P. Achenbach, C. Ayerbe Gayoso, D. Baumann, J. Bernauer, A. M. Bernstein, R. Bohm, D. Bosnar a nd T. Botto, et al. Measurements of the /u1D6FE*p → Δ reaction at low Q 2, Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 136 (2013) , [arXiv:1307.0751 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  47. [47]

    Blanpied, M

    G. Blanpied, M. Blecher, A. Caracappa, C. Djalali, G. Gi ordano, K. Hicks, S. Hoblit, M. Khandaker, O. C. Kistner and A. Kuczewski, et al. N – > Delta Transition from Simultaneous Measurements of p (gamm a – > , pi) and p (gamma – > , gamma), Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4337-4340 (1997). 20

    work page 1997

  48. [48]

    Blanpied, M

    G. Blanpied, M. Blecher, A. Caracappa, R. Deininger, C. Djalali, G. Giordano, K. Hicks, S. Hoblit, M. Khandaker and O . C. Kistner, et al. N — > delta transition and proton polarizabilities from measure ments of p (gamma polarized, gamma), p (gamma polarized, pi0 ), and p (gamma polarized, pi+), Phys. Rev. C 64, 025203 (2001)

    work page 2001

  49. [49]

    F. X. Lee, Determination of decuplet baryon magnetic mo ments from QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 57, 1801-1821 (1998), [arXiv:hep-ph/9708323 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  50. [50]

    T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi and M. Savci, Electric Quadrupole a nd Magnetic Octupole Moments of the Light Decuplet Baryons W ithin Light Cone QCD Sum Rules, Phys. Lett. B 681, 240-246 (2009) , [arXiv:0904.2485 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  51. [51]

    Magnetic Dipole, Electric Quadrupole and Magnetic Octupole Moments of the $\Delta$ Baryons in Light Cone QCD Sum Rules

    K. Azizi, Magnetic Dipole, Electric Quadrupole and Mag netic Octupole Moments of the Delta Baryons in Light Cone QCD Sum Rules, Eur. Phys. J. C 61, 311-319 (2009) , [arXiv:0811.2670 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  52. [52]

    T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, T. Barakat and M. Savcı, Diagonal a nd transition magnetic moments of negative parity heavy bar yons in QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 92, 036004 (2015) , [arXiv:1505.07977 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  53. [53]

    A. J. Buchmann and R. F. Lebed, Baryon charge radii and qu adrupole moments in the 1/N(c) expansion: The three flavor ca se, Phys. Rev. D 67, 016002 (2003) , [arXiv:hep-ph/0207358 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  54. [54]

    Dirac form factors and electric charge radii of baryons in the combined chiral and 1/N_c expansions

    R. Flores-Mendieta and M. A. Rivera-Ruiz, Dirac form fa ctors and electric charge radii of baryons in the combined ch iral and 1/N /u1D450 expansions, Phys. Rev. D 92, 094026 (2015) , [arXiv:1511.02932 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  55. [55]

    V . M. Banda Guzm ´an, R. Flores-Mendieta, J. Hern ´andez and F. d. Rosales-Aldape, Baryon quadrupole moment in the 1/ /u1D441/u1D450expansion of QCD, Phys. Rev. D 101, 074018 (2020) , [arXiv:2002.09256 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  56. [56]

    E. J. Gonzalez de Urreta and N. N. Scoccola, Consistent a nalysis of the masses and decays of the [70, 1-] baryons in the 1/N(c) expansion, AIP Conf. Proc. 1432, 265-268 (2012)

    work page 2012

  57. [57]

    Matagne and F

    N. Matagne and F. Stancu, Excited baryons in the 1/N(c) e xpansion, AIP Conf. Proc. 1432, 106-111 (2012)

    work page 2012

  58. [58]

    J. L. Goity, C. P. Jayalath and N. N. Scoccola, The 1/N(c) expansion in baryons, AIP Conf. Proc. 1257, 181-188 (2010)

    work page 2010

  59. [59]

    C. P. Jayalath, J. L. Goity and N. N. Scoccola, Negative p arity baryon decays in the 1/N(c) expansion, AIP Conf. Proc. 1257, 548-552 (2010)

    work page 2010

  60. [60]

    J. Y . Kim and H. C. Kim, Electromagnetic form factors of t he baryon decuplet with flavor SU(3) symmetry breaking, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 570 (2019) , [arXiv:1905.04017 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    L. S. Geng, J. Martin Camalich and M. J. Vicente Vacas, El ectromagnetic structure of the lowest-lying decuplet reso nances in covariant chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 80, 034027 (2009) , [arXiv:0907.0631 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  62. [62]

    Covariant baryon charge radii and magnetic moments in a chiral constituent quark model

    K. Berger, R. F. Wagenbrunn and W. Plessas, Covariant ba ryon charge radii and magnetic moments in a chiral constitue nt quark model, Phys. Rev. D 70, 094027 (2004) , [arXiv:nucl-th/0407009 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  63. [63]

    Y . s. Oh, Electric quadrupole moments of the decuplet ba ryons in the Skyrme model, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 10, 1027-1034 (1995), [arXiv:hep-ph/9506308 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  64. [64]

    M. I. Krivoruchenko and M. M. Giannini, Quadrupole mome nts of the decuplet baryons, Phys. Rev. D 43, 3763-3765 (1991)

    work page 1991

  65. [65]

    J. Wang, D. Fu and Y . Dong, Form factors of decuplet baryo ns in a covariant quark–diquark approach, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 79 (2024) , [arXiv:2311.07149 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    Generalized Parton Distributions

    M. Diehl, Generalized parton distributions, Phys. Rept. 388, 41-277 (2003) , [arXiv:hep-ph/0307382 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  67. [67]

    Hadron tomography by generalized distribution amplitudes in pion-pair production process $\gamma^* \gamma \rightarrow \pi^0 \pi^0 $ and gravitational form factors for pion

    S. Kumano, Q. T. Song and O. V . Teryaev, Hadron tomograph y by generalized distribution amplitudes in pion-pair prod uction process /u1D6FE∗/u1D6FE→ /u1D70B0/u1D70B0 and gravitational form factors for pion, Phys. Rev. D 97, 014020 (2018) , [arXiv:1711.08088 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  68. [68]

    D. Fu, B. D. Sun and Y . Dong, Electromagnetic and gravita tional form factors of /u1D43Bresonance in a covariant quark-diquark approach, Phys. Rev. D 105, 096002 (2022) , [arXiv:2201.08059 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  69. [69]

    J. Y . Kim and B. D. Sun, Gravitational form factors of a baryon with spin-3/2, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 85 (2021) , [arXiv:2011.00292 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  70. [70]

    D. A. Pefkou, D. C. Hackett and P. E. Shanahan, Gluon grav itational structure of hadrons of different spin, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054509 (2022) , [arXiv:2107.10368 [hep-lat]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  71. [71]

    J. Y . Panteleeva and M. V . Polyakov, Quadrupole pressur e and shear forces inside baryons in the large /u1D441/u1D450limit, Phys. Lett. B 809, 135707 (2020) , [arXiv:2004.02912 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  72. [72]

    Dehghan, K

    Z. Dehghan, K. Azizi and U. ¨Ozdem, Gravitational form factors of the /u1D43Bbaryon via QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094037 (2023) , [arXiv:2307.14880 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    Dehghan and K

    Z. Dehghan and K. Azizi, Mechanical properties of the Ω - baryon from gravitational form factors, Phys. Rev. D 112, 054014 (2025) , [arXiv:2507.14840 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    I. A. Perevalova, M. V . Polyakov and P. Schweitzer, On LH Cb pentaquarks as a baryon- /u1D713(2S) bound state: prediction of isospin- 3 2 pentaquarks with hidden charm, Phys. Rev. D 94, 054024 (2016) , [arXiv:1607.07008 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  75. [75]

    Cotogno, C

    S. Cotogno, C. Lorc ´e, P. Lowdon and M. Morales, Covariant multipole expansion o f local currents for massive states of any spin, Phys. Rev. D 101, 056016 (2020) , [arXiv:1912.08749 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  76. [76]

    J. Y . Kim, H. C. Kim and M. V . Polyakov, Light-cone distri bution amplitudes of the nucleon and /u1D43Bbaryon, JHEP 11, 039 (2021) , [arXiv:2110.05889 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  77. [77]

    Alharazin, E

    H. Alharazin, E. Epelbaum, J. Gegelia, U. G. Meißner and B. D. Sun, Gravitational form factors of the delta resonance in chiral EFT, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 907 (2022) , [arXiv:2209.01233 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  78. [78]

    Alharazin, B

    H. Alharazin, B. D. Sun, E. Epelbaum, J. Gegelia and U. G. Meißner, Local spatial densities for composite spin-3/2 sy stems, JHEP 02, 163 (2023) , [arXiv:2212.11505 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  79. [79]

    D. Fu, J. Wang and Y . Dong, Form factors of Ω - in a covariant quark-diquark approach, Phys. Rev. D 108, 076023 (2023) , [arXiv:2306.04869 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  80. [80]

    J. Y . Kim, Parametrization of transition energy-momen tum tensor form factors, Phys. Lett. B 834, 137442 (2022) , [arXiv:2206.10202 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.