arxiv: 2601.18881 · v1 · submitted 2026-01-26 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: no theorem link

Schubert line defects in 3d GLSMs, part II: Partial flag manifolds and parabolic quantum polynomials

Cyril Closset , Wei Gu , Osama Khlaif , Eric Sharpe , Hao Zhang , Hao Zou

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 10:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords Schubert line defects3d GLSMpartial flag manifoldsquantum K-theoryparabolic Whitney polynomialsparabolic quantum Grothendieck polynomialsquantum cohomology

0 comments

The pith

Schubert line defects in 3d GLSMs for partial flag manifolds reproduce parabolic Whitney polynomials in quantum K-theory.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs Schubert line defects in 3d N=2 gauged linear sigma models whose target is a partial flag manifold. These defects are realized as 1d supersymmetric gauge theories coupled to the 3d theory and are expected to flow to objects supported on Schubert varieties. Their flavored Witten indices match the parabolic Whitney polynomials, which represent Schubert classes in the Whitney presentation of the quantum K-theory ring, as verified in examples. This supplies evidence for the 3d GLSM-quantum K-theory correspondence. The work further produces new parabolic quantum Grothendieck polynomials in the Toda presentation after applying quantum ring relations, with reductions to known cases in limits including the 2d quantum cohomology setting.

Core claim

The flavored Witten indices of the constructed Schubert defects reproduce the parabolic Whitney polynomials that represent the Schubert classes [O_w] in the Whitney presentation of the quantum K-theory ring of the partial flag manifold. Upon using the quantum ring relations, these convert into new parabolic quantum Grothendieck polynomials in the Toda presentation that specialize to known polynomials such as the quantum Grothendieck polynomials for complete flags. In the 2d limit the construction realizes the Schubert classes in the quantum cohomology ring and the polynomials reduce to previously known parabolic quantum Schubert polynomials.

What carries the argument

Schubert line defects realized as 1d N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories coupled to the 3d GLSM, whose flavored Witten indices compute polynomial representatives of the Schubert classes [O_w] in the quantum K-theory ring.

If this is right

The construction extends previous results for complete flag manifolds to the setting of partial flag manifolds.
The parabolic Whitney polynomials are confirmed as representatives of Schubert classes in the quantum K-theory ring.
New parabolic quantum Grothendieck polynomials arise in the Toda presentation after quantum ring relations are applied.
In the 2d limit the defects correspond to Schubert classes in quantum cohomology and the polynomials reduce to known parabolic quantum Schubert polynomials.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The defect construction could be used to obtain Schubert class representatives in quantum K-theory for other homogeneous spaces.
The new polynomials may connect to problems in enumerative geometry or to integrable systems associated with Toda lattices.
Generalizations to other target spaces or supersymmetry levels would test whether the infrared flow assumption holds more broadly.

Load-bearing premise

The 1d N=2 defect theories, when coupled to the 3d GLSM, flow in the infrared to objects supported precisely on the Schubert varieties X_w such that their flavored Witten indices compute the Chern character of the structure sheaf [O_w] in quantum K-theory.

What would settle it

Compute the flavored Witten index of the 1d defect for a specific Schubert variety in a small partial flag manifold such as Fl(1,2;3) and verify whether it exactly equals the corresponding parabolic Whitney polynomial.

read the original abstract

We construct Schubert line defects in the 3d $\mathcal{N}=2$ supersymmetric gauged linear sigma model (GLSM) with target space a partial flag manifold $X={\rm Fl}({\boldsymbol{k}};n)$, generalizing our construction for complete flag manifolds given in a companion paper arXiv:2512.19802 (part I). In the context of the 3d GLSM/quantum K-theory correspondence, the Schubert line defects are constructed as 1d $\mathcal{N}=2$ supersymmetric gauge theories coupled to the 3d field theory, and they flow to objects supported on Schubert varieties $X_w \subseteq X$ in the quantum K-theory. The flavored Witten index of the 1d defect is expected to compute the Chern character of $[\mathcal{O}_w]$ -- more precisely, it gives us a polynomial representative of the Schubert class in the quantum K-theory ring. We give strong evidence for this claim by showing in examples that the Witten indices of Schubert defects indeed reproduce a recently-defined set of polynomials that represent the Schubert classes in the Whitney presentation, which we call the parabolic Whitney polynomials. Moreover, upon using the quantum ring relations, we can convert these polynomials into seemingly new polynomials in the Toda presentation, which we call the parabolic quantum Grothendieck polynomials. These new polynomials specialize to known polynomials in various limits, including to the quantum Grothendieck polynomials in the case of the complete flag. In the 2d limit, our construction also realizes the Schubert classes $[X_w]$ in the quantum cohomology ring of the partial flag manifold, and the parabolic quantum Grothendieck polynomials then reduce to previously known parabolic quantum Schubert polynomials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This extends Schubert defects to partial flags and defines new parabolic Whitney and quantum Grothendieck polynomials that match indices in examples, but the IR support on X_w is assumed rather than generally derived.

read the letter

The paper builds 1d N=2 defects coupled to 3d GLSMs whose targets are partial flag manifolds Fl(k;n). The flavored Witten indices are supposed to give polynomial representatives for Schubert classes [O_w] in quantum K-theory. They introduce parabolic Whitney polynomials in the Whitney presentation and, after applying the quantum ring relations, parabolic quantum Grothendieck polynomials in the Toda presentation. These reduce to the complete-flag quantum Grothendieck polynomials and to ordinary parabolic quantum Schubert polynomials in the 2d limit, which is a clean check. They also verify the index matches the new polynomials in explicit examples, which supplies concrete evidence for those cases and shows the construction is workable at least there. That part is useful: new explicit objects for partial flags that were not in the prior literature. The soft spot is the central identification. The abstract says the defects are expected to flow to objects supported precisely on the Schubert varieties X_w and that the index therefore computes the Chern character of O_w. Evidence is given only by matching examples; no general localization computation or derivation of the support property for arbitrary w appears. If that IR assumption does not hold in general, the claim that the indices reproduce the Schubert classes weakens. The construction itself looks technically sound and the citation pattern to part I and related quantum K-theory work is appropriate. This is for readers working on quantum K-theory of flag varieties or on GLSM realizations of Schubert calculus. Someone who needs explicit polynomial representatives or wants to test new objects in the partial-flag setting will find material here. I would send it to referees; the extension is natural, the examples give a foothold, and the new polynomials are worth having even if the general support argument needs strengthening.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs Schubert line defects in 3d N=2 GLSMs with target partial flag manifold X=Fl(k;n) as 1d N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories coupled to the 3d theory. These defects are claimed to flow in the IR to objects supported on Schubert varieties X_w, with their flavored Witten indices computing the Chern character of the structure sheaf [O_w] and thereby reproducing a set of parabolic Whitney polynomials that represent the Schubert classes in the Whitney presentation of the quantum K-theory ring. Explicit example matches are shown; the indices are then converted via quantum ring relations into new parabolic quantum Grothendieck polynomials in the Toda presentation, which reduce to known polynomials (including quantum Grothendieck polynomials for complete flags) in various limits. In the 2d limit the construction recovers Schubert classes in quantum cohomology.

Significance. If the IR flow holds, the work supplies a physical realization of Schubert classes in quantum K-theory of partial flags via defects, introduces new polynomial representatives (parabolic Whitney and quantum Grothendieck polynomials) that generalize prior constructions, and provides explicit computational evidence plus limit consistency checks that strengthen the 3d GLSM/quantum K-theory correspondence.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract and introduction: the central claim that the flavored Witten indices reproduce the parabolic Whitney polynomials representing [O_w] for arbitrary w rests on the assumption that the coupled 1d defects flow in the IR to objects supported precisely on X_w; this flow is described as 'expected' and supported only by explicit example matches, with no general localization computation or derivation establishing the precise support property.

minor comments (2)

Define the parabolic Whitney polynomials and their precise relation to the Whitney presentation of the quantum K-theory ring at the first appearance in the introduction, rather than deferring to later sections.
Ensure consistent notation for the partial flag manifold Fl(k;n) and the indexing of Schubert varieties X_w throughout the text and figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive feedback. We address the major comment point by point below, clarifying the evidential basis of our claims while making targeted revisions to the abstract and introduction.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and introduction: the central claim that the flavored Witten indices reproduce the parabolic Whitney polynomials representing [O_w] for arbitrary w rests on the assumption that the coupled 1d defects flow in the IR to objects supported precisely on X_w; this flow is described as 'expected' and supported only by explicit example matches, with no general localization computation or derivation establishing the precise support property.

Authors: We agree that the IR flow of the 1d defects to objects supported precisely on X_w is an assumption motivated by the 3d GLSM/quantum K-theory correspondence established in prior literature and in part I of this work. The manuscript supports this via explicit index computations that match the parabolic Whitney polynomials in several examples, rather than a general localization derivation. In the revised manuscript we have updated the abstract and introduction to state this assumption and the nature of the supporting evidence more precisely, avoiding any implication of a general proof. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved

General localization computation or derivation establishing the precise support property of the 1d defects on X_w for arbitrary w

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central claim rests on explicit example matching rather than self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper constructs 1d N=2 defect theories coupled to the 3d GLSM for partial flag manifolds, generalizing the method of the companion paper. It states that these are expected to flow to objects supported on Schubert varieties X_w and that their flavored Witten indices compute ch([O_w]) in the quantum K-theory ring. The reproduction of parabolic Whitney polynomials is presented as evidence obtained by direct computation in explicit examples, not as a general derivation. The self-citation to arXiv:2512.19802 supplies the construction template but does not define or force the index values or the matching; the GLSM/quantum K-theory correspondence supplies context but the specific polynomials are matched independently. No equation or step reduces the claimed reproduction to a fitted input, self-definition, or unverified self-citation chain by construction. The result is therefore self-contained against external mathematical definitions of the polynomials.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard axioms of 3d N=2 supersymmetry, the GLSM/quantum K-theory correspondence established in prior work, and the geometric definition of partial flag manifolds and Schubert varieties. No new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond the defect theories themselves, which are constructed from the geometry.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The 3d N=2 GLSM with target Fl(k;n) flows to the nonlinear sigma model on that manifold in the infrared.
Invoked when stating that the defects flow to objects supported on Schubert varieties inside X.
domain assumption The flavored Witten index of the 1d defect computes the Chern character of the structure sheaf class in quantum K-theory.
This is the key link between the physical observable and the mathematical Schubert class; stated as an expectation in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5627 in / 1726 out tokens · 21341 ms · 2026-05-16T10:32:34.494569+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · 25 internal anchors

[1]

Schubert line defects in 3d GLSMs, part I: Complete flag manifolds and quantum Grothendieck polynomials

C. Closset, W. Gu, O. Khlaif, E. Sharpe, H. Zhang and H. Zou,Schubert line defects in 3d GLSMs, part I: Complete flag manifolds and quantum Grothendieck polynomials,2512.19802

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[2]

Defects and Quantum Seiberg-Witten Geometry

M. Bullimore, H.-C. Kim and P. Koroteev,Defects and quantum Seiberg-Witten geometry, JHEP05(2015) 095, [1412.6081]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[3]

A 3d Gauge Theory/Quantum K-Theory Correspondence

H. Jockers and P. Mayr,A 3d gauge theory/quantum K-theory correspondence,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.24(2020) 327–457, [1808.02040]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020
[4]

Jockers and P

H. Jockers and P. Mayr,Quantum K-theory of Calabi-Yau manifolds,JHEP11(2019) 011, [1905.03548]

work page arXiv 2019
[5]

Jockers, P

H. Jockers, P. Mayr, U. Ninad and A. Tabler,BPS indices, modularity and perturbations in quantum K-theory,JHEP02(2022) 044, [2106.07670]

work page arXiv 2022
[6]

Ueda and Y

K. Ueda and Y. Yoshida,3dN= 2 Chern-Simons-matter theory, Bethe ansatz, and quantum K-theory of Grassmannians,JHEP08(2020) 157, [1912.03792]

work page arXiv 2020
[7]

Koroteev, P

P. Koroteev, P. P. Pushkar, A. V. Smirnov and A. M. Zeitlin,Quantum K-theory of quiver varieties and many-body systems,Selecta Math.27(2021) 87, [1705.10419]

work page arXiv 2021
[8]

Bullimore, A

M. Bullimore, A. Ferrari and H. Kim,Twisted indices of 3dN= 4 gauge theories and enumerative geometry of quasi-maps,JHEP07(2019) 014, [1812.05567]

work page arXiv 2019
[9]

Bullimore, A

M. Bullimore, A. E. V. Ferrari and H. Kim,The 3d twisted index and wall-crossing,SciPost Phys.12(2022) 186, [1912.09591]

work page arXiv 2022
[10]

Bullimore, A

M. Bullimore, A. E. V. Ferrari, H. Kim and G. Xu,The twisted index and topological saddles, JHEP05(2022) 116, [2007.11603]

work page arXiv 2022
[11]

W. Gu, L. Mihalcea, E. Sharpe and H. Zou,Quantum K theory of symplectic Grassmannians, J. Geom. Phys.177(2022) 104548, [2008.04909]

work page arXiv 2022
[12]

Dedushenko and N

M. Dedushenko and N. Nekrasov,Interfaces and quantum algebras, I: Stable envelopes,J. Geom. Phys.194(2023) 104991, [2109.10941]

work page arXiv 2023
[13]

W. Gu, L. Mihalcea, E. Sharpe and H. Zou,Quantum K theory of Grassmannians, Wilson line operators and Schur bundles,Forum Math. Sigma13(2025) e140, [2208.01091]

work page arXiv 2025
[14]

Dedushenko and N

M. Dedushenko and N. Nekrasov,Interfaces and quantum algebras, II: Cigar partition function, 2306.16434. – 67 –

work page arXiv
[15]

W. Gu, L. Mihalcea, E. Sharpe, W. Xu, H. Zhang and H. Zou,Quantum K theory rings of partial flag manifolds,J. Geom. Phys.198(2024) 105127, [2306.11094]

work page arXiv 2024
[16]

W. Gu, L. C. Mihalcea, E. Sharpe, W. Xu, H. Zhang and H. Zou,Quantum K Whitney relations for partial flag varieties,2310.03826

work page arXiv
[17]

W. Gu, L. C. Mihalcea, E. Sharpe, W. Xu, H. Zhang and H. Zou,A Nakayama result for the quantum K theory of homogeneous spaces, ´Epijournal de G´ eom´ etrie Alg´ ebrique9(2025) no. 25, [2507.15183]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[18]

W. Gu, D. Pei and M. Zhang,On phases of 3d N=2 Chern-Simons-matter theories,Nucl. Phys. B973(2021) 115604, [2105.02247]

work page arXiv 2021
[19]

Gu,Vacuum structures revisited,2110.13156

W. Gu,Vacuum structures revisited,2110.13156

work page arXiv
[20]

Sharpe and H

E. Sharpe and H. Zhang,Decomposition squared,JHEP10(2024) 168, [2405.12269]

work page arXiv 2024
[21]

Closset and O

C. Closset and O. Khlaif,Grothendieck lines in 3dN= 2 SQCD and the quantum K-theory of the Grassmannian,JHEP12(2023) 082, [2309.06980]

work page arXiv 2023
[22]

Closset and O

C. Closset and O. Khlaif,New results on 3dN=2 SQCD and its 3d GLSM interpretation,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39(2024) 2446011, [2312.05076]

work page arXiv 2024
[23]

Huq-Kuruvilla,Quantum K-rings of partial flag varieties, Coulomb branches, and the Bethe ansatz,2409.15575

I. Huq-Kuruvilla,Quantum K-rings of partial flag varieties, Coulomb branches, and the Bethe ansatz,2409.15575

work page arXiv
[24]

Huq-Kuruvilla, L

I. Huq-Kuruvilla, L. Mihalcea, E. Sharpe and H. Zhang,Quantum K-theory levels in physics and math,2507.00116

work page arXiv
[25]

Amini, I

K. Amini, I. Huq-Kuruvilla, L. C. Mihalcea, D. Orr and W. Xu,Toda-type presentations for the quantum K theory of partial flag varieties,SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl.21(2025) Paper No. 098, [2504.07412]

work page arXiv 2025
[26]

Comments on twisted indices in 3d supersymmetric gauge theories

C. Closset and H. Kim,Comments on twisted indices in 3d supersymmetric gauge theories, JHEP08(2016) 059, [1605.06531]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[27]

Jockers, P

H. Jockers, P. Mayr, U. Ninad and A. Tabler,Wilson loop algebras and quantum K-theory for Grassmannians,JHEP10(2020) 036, [1911.13286]

work page arXiv 2020
[28]

W. Gu, L. Mihalcea, E. Sharpe, W. Xu, H. Zhang and H. Zou,Schubert defects in Lagrangian Grassmannians,JHEP(2025) 148, [2502.04438]

work page arXiv 2025
[29]

GLSM's for partial flag manifolds

R. Donagi and E. Sharpe,GLSM’s for partial flag manifolds,J. Geom. Phys.58(2008) 1662–1692, [0704.1761]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[30]

Anderson and W

D. Anderson and W. Fulton,Equivariant Cohomology in Algebraic Geometry. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2023

work page 2023
[31]

Macdonald,Notes on Schubert Polynomials, vol

I. Macdonald,Notes on Schubert Polynomials, vol. 6. Publications du LaCIM, Laboratoire de combinatoire et d’informatique math´ ematique (LaCIM), Universit´ e du Qu´ ebec ` a Montr´ eal, 1991

work page 1991
[32]

Lascoux and M.-P

A. Lascoux and M.-P. Sch¨ utzenberger,Symmetry and flag manifolds, inInvariant Theory: Proceedings of the 1st 1982 Session of the Centro Internazionale Matematico Estivo (CIME) Held at Montecatini, Italy, June 10–18, 1982, pp. 118–144. Springer, 2006. – 68 –

work page 1982
[33]

Lascoux and M.-P

A. Lascoux and M.-P. Sch¨ utzenberger,Polynˆ omes de Schubert,C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. I Math.294(1982) 447–450

work page 1982
[34]

Fulton,Flags, Schubert polynomials, degeneracy loci, and determinantal formulas,Duke Math

W. Fulton,Flags, Schubert polynomials, degeneracy loci, and determinantal formulas,Duke Math. J.65(1992) 381–420

work page 1992
[35]

Fomin, S

S. Fomin, S. Gelfand and A. Postnikov,Quantum Schubert polynomials,J. Amer. Math. Soc. 10(1997) 565–596

work page 1997
[36]

A. N. Kirillov and T. Maeno,Quantum double Schubert polynomials, quantum Schubert polynomials and Vafa–Intriligator formula,Discrete Math.217(2000) 191–223, [q-alg/9610022]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[37]

Quantum double Schubert polynomials represent Schubert classes

T. Lam and M. Shimozono,Quantum double Schubert polynomials represent Schubert classes, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.142(2014) 835–850, [1108.4958]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[38]

A. S. Buch,Grothendieck classes of quiver varieties,Duke Math. J.115(2002) 75–103, [math/0104029]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[39]

Lascoux and M.-P

A. Lascoux and M.-P. Sch¨ utzenberger,Structure de Hopf de l’anneau de cohomologie et de l’anneau de Grothendieck d’une vari´ et´ e de drapeaux,CR Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. I Math295 (1982) 629–633

work page 1982
[40]

Lascoux,Anneau de Grothendieck de la vari´ et´ e de drapeaux, inThe Grothendieck Festschrift, Vol

A. Lascoux,Anneau de Grothendieck de la vari´ et´ e de drapeaux, inThe Grothendieck Festschrift, Vol. III, vol. 88 ofProgr. Math., pp. 1–34. Birkh¨ auser Boston, Boston, MA, 1990. DOI

work page 1990
[41]

Fulton and A

W. Fulton and A. Lascoux,A Pieri formula in the Grothendieck ring of a flag bundle,Duke Math. J.76(1994) 711 – 729

work page 1994
[42]

Quantum Grothendieck Polynomials

C. Lenart and T. Maeno,Quantum Grothendieck polynomials,math/0608232

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[43]

Maeno, S

T. Maeno, S. Naito and D. Sagaki,A presentation of the torus-equivariant quantumK-theory ring of flag manifolds of typeA, Part II: quantum double Grothendieck polynomials,Forum Math. Sigma13(2025) Paper No. e19, 26, [2305.17685]

work page arXiv 2025
[44]

K. Hori, H. Kim and P. Yi,Witten index and wall crossing,JHEP01(2015) 124, [1407.2567]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[45]

The Verlinde Algebra And The Cohomology Of The Grassmannian

E. Witten,The Verlinde algebra and the cohomology of the Grassmannian, inGeometry, topology, & physics, vol. IV ofConf. Proc. Lecture Notes Geom. Topology, pp. 357–422. Int. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.hep-th/9312104

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[46]

Closset and O

C. Closset and O. Khlaif,Twisted indices, Bethe ideals and 3dN= 2 infrared dualities,JHEP 05(2023) 148, [2301.10753]

work page arXiv 2023
[47]

Wolfram Research Inc.,Wolfram—One Mathematica, Version 13.1

work page
[48]

Witten,Topological sigma models,Commun

E. Witten,Topological sigma models,Commun. Math. Phys.118(1988) 411–449

work page 1988
[49]

The equivariant A-twist and gauged linear sigma models on the two-sphere

C. Closset, S. Cremonesi and D. S. Park,The equivariant A-twist and gauged linear sigma models on the two-sphere,JHEP06(2015) 076, [1504.06308]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[50]

Quantum cohomology of partial flag manifolds

A. Astashkevich and V. Sadov,Quantum cohomology of partial flag manifoldsF n1...nk, Commun. Math. Phys.170(1995) 503–528, [hep-th/9401103]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[51]

D. R. Morrison and M. R. Plesser,Summing the instantons: Quantum cohomology and mirror symmetry in toric varieties,Nucl. Phys. B440(1995) 279–354, [hep-th/9412236]. – 69 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[52]

N. A. Nekrasov and S. L. Shatashvili,Supersymmetric vacua and Bethe ansatz,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.192-193(2009) 91–112, [0901.4744]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[53]

Aspects of 3d N=2 Chern-Simons-Matter Theories

K. Intriligator and N. Seiberg,Aspects of 3d N=2 Chern-Simons-matter theories,JHEP07 (2013) 079, [1305.1633]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[54]

Closset and O

C. Closset and O. Khlaif,On the Witten index of 3dN= 2unitary SQCD with general CS levels,SciPost Phys.15(2023) 085, [2305.00534]

work page arXiv 2023
[55]

Quantum Riemann - Roch, Lefschetz and Serre

T. Coates and A. Givental,Quantum Riemann-Roch, Lefschetz and Serre,Ann. of Math. (2) 165(2007) 15–53, [math/0110142]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[56]

The level structure in quantum K-theory and mock theta functions

Y. Ruan and M. M. Zhang,The level structure in quantum K-theory and mock theta functions, 1804.06552

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[57]

Y. Ruan, Y. Wen and Z. Zhou,QuantumK-theory of toric varieties, level structures, and 3d mirror symmetry,Adv. Math.410(2022) Paper No. 108770, 39, [2011.07519]

work page arXiv 2022
[58]

Nakajima,Quiver varieties and Kac-Moody algebras,Duke Math

H. Nakajima,Quiver varieties and Kac-Moody algebras,Duke Math. J.91(1998) 515–560

work page 1998
[59]

Billey and V

S. Billey and V. Lakshmibai,Singular loci of Schubert varieties, vol. 182. Springer Science & Business Media, 2000

work page 2000
[60]

Quantum cohomology of partial flag manifolds

A. Buch,Quantum cohomology of partial flag manifolds,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.357(2005) 443–458, [math/0303245]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[61]

Iezzi,Quiver Grassmannians for the Bott-Samelson resolution of type A Schubert varieties, Algebr

G. Iezzi,Quiver Grassmannians for the Bott-Samelson resolution of type A Schubert varieties, Algebr. Represent. Theory28(2025) 1139–1158, [2502.11790]

work page arXiv 2025
[62]

Closset and J

C. Closset and J. Wynne,Dualities and trialities inN= 2supersymmetric gauged quantum mechanics,2512.02984

work page arXiv
[63]

A. S. Buch and L. C. Mihalcea,QuantumK-theory of Grassmannians,Duke Math. J.156 (2011) 501–538, [0810.0981]

work page arXiv 2011
[64]

Quadrality for Supersymmetric Matrix Models

S. Franco, S. Lee, R.-K. Seong and C. Vafa,Quadrality for supersymmetric matrix models, JHEP07(2017) 053, [1612.06859]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[65]

B-branes and supersymmetric quivers in 2d

C. Closset, J. Guo and E. Sharpe,B-branes and supersymmetric quivers in 2d,JHEP02(2018) 051, [1711.10195]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[66]

Kempf and D

G. Kempf and D. Laksov,The determinantal formula of Schubert calculus,Acta Math.132 (1974) 153–162

work page 1974
[67]

M. R. Douglas, B. R. Greene and D. R. Morrison,Orbifold resolution by D-branes,Nucl. Phys. B506(1997) 84–106, [hep-th/9704151]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[68]

Spectra of D-branes with Higgs vevs

R. Donagi, S. Katz and E. Sharpe,Spectra of D-branes with Higgs vevs,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.8(2004) 813–859, [hep-th/0309270]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[69]

Lectures on the geometry of flag varieties

M. Brion,Lectures on the geometry of flag varieties, inTopics in cohomological studies of algebraic varieties, Trends Math., pp. 33–85. Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 2005.math/0410240. DOI. – 70 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005