pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.19802 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-22 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Schubert line defects in 3d GLSMs, part I: Complete flag manifolds and quantum Grothendieck polynomials

Cyril Closset , Wei Gu , Osama Khlaif , Eric Sharpe , Hao Zhang , Hao Zou
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 20:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords Schubert varietiesquantum K-theorycomplete flag manifolds3d GLSMline defectsquantum Grothendieck polynomialsBott-Samelson resolutionWitten index
0
0 comments X

The pith

Schubert line defects in 3d GLSMs restrict the target space to Schubert varieties X_w and reproduce their structure sheaf Chern characters as quantum Grothendieck polynomials.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds half-BPS line defects in 3d N=2 quiver gauge theories whose Higgs branches are complete flag manifolds Fl(n). These defects are implemented as coupled supersymmetric quantum mechanics quivers. Upon circle compactification the defects flow to objects supported on Schubert varieties inside the flag manifold. Insertion of the defect restricts the 3d GLSM target space to the Schubert variety X_w, while the 1d modes physically realize a Bott-Samelson resolution of that variety. The flavored Witten index of the quiver SQM then equals the equivariant Chern character of the structure sheaf O_{X_w} expressed as a double quantum Grothendieck polynomial, extending earlier Grassmannian results and supplying a direct physical link between 3d GLSMs and the quantum K-theory of complete flags. In the small-radius limit the setup produces a 0d-2d system whose partition function yields the Schubert classes in the quantum cohomology ring.

Core claim

The 1d flavored Witten index of the quiver SQM reproduces the (equivariant) Chern character of the structure sheaf O_{X_w} as a (double) quantum Grothendieck polynomial, with the line defect restricting the 3d GLSM target space to the Schubert variety X_w and the 1d degrees of freedom realizing a Bott-Samelson resolution of X_w.

What carries the argument

The Schubert line defect, realized as an N=2 SQM quiver coupled to the 3d GLSM, whose Witten index computes the quantum Grothendieck polynomial for the structure sheaf on X_w.

If this is right

  • The construction supplies a direct physical realization of the 3d GLSM/quantum K-theory correspondence for complete flag manifolds.
  • In the small-circle limit a 0d-2d coupled system realizes the Schubert classes [X_w] inside the quantum cohomology ring of X.
  • These line defects furnish an important basis for the quantum K-theory ring of the flag manifold.
  • The same method extends the earlier Grassmannian case to all complete flags.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The physical Bott-Samelson realization may allow direct gauge-theory calculations of K-theoretic structure constants that are currently known only combinatorially.
  • Dimensional reduction from the 3d setup to the 0d-2d system suggests a unified gauge-theoretic origin for both quantum cohomology and quantum K-theory classes.
  • The same line-defect construction could be tested on partial flag manifolds or on quiver varieties beyond complete flags.

Load-bearing premise

Inserting the Schubert line defect restricts the GLSM target space exactly to the Schubert variety X_w, with the one-dimensional degrees of freedom providing a physical Bott-Samelson resolution.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the flavored Witten index for the smallest non-trivial flag manifold Fl(3) and a chosen permutation w that fails to match the independently known quantum Grothendieck polynomial for O_{X_w}.

read the original abstract

We construct new half-BPS line defects in 3d $\mathcal{N}=2$ supersymmetric quiver gauge theories whose Higgs branches are complete flag manifolds $X = {\rm Fl}(n)$. Upon circle compactification, the bulk theory flows to a non-linear sigma model (NLSM) with target space $X$ and the line defects flow to objects supported on Schubert varieties $X_w \subseteq X$. These Schubert line defects form an important basis of the quantum K-theory of $X$. They are realized as $\mathcal{N}=2$ supersymmetric quantum mechanics (SQM) quivers coupled to the 3d gauge theory. We show that the insertion of the Schubert line defect restricts the target space of the 3d gauged linear sigma model (GLSM) to the Schubert variety $X_w$, with the 1d degrees of freedom physically realizing a Bott--Samelson resolution of $X_w$. Moreover, we verify in examples that the 1d flavored Witten index of the quiver SQM reproduces the (equivariant) Chern character of the structure sheaf $\mathcal{O}_{X_w}$ as a (double) quantum Grothendieck polynomial, generalizing previous results for $X$ a Grassmannian manifold. Our construction thus provides a more direct realization of the 3d GLSM/quantum K-theory correspondence for complete flag manifolds. Finally, in the small-circle limit, we obtain a 0d-2d coupled system that realizes the Schubert classes $[X_w]$ in the quantum cohomology ring of $X$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs half-BPS Schubert line defects in 3d N=2 quiver gauge theories with Higgs branches given by complete flag manifolds X = Fl(n). These defects are realized as N=2 SQM quivers coupled to the 3d GLSM; upon circle compactification the bulk flows to an NLSM on X while the defects flow to objects supported on Schubert varieties X_w. The authors claim that the defect insertion restricts the GLSM target space to X_w, with the 1d degrees of freedom supplying a physical Bott-Samelson resolution of X_w. They verify in examples that the 1d flavored Witten index reproduces the equivariant Chern character of O_{X_w} as a double quantum Grothendieck polynomial (generalizing prior Grassmannian results) and, in the small-circle limit, obtain a 0d-2d system realizing the Schubert classes in the quantum cohomology ring of X.

Significance. If the physical mechanism for target-space restriction and Bott-Samelson realization can be derived directly from the coupled Lagrangian, the construction would supply a concrete 3d GLSM realization of quantum K-theory for complete flag manifolds, extending the Grassmannian case and furnishing a unified physical origin for both quantum Grothendieck polynomials and quantum cohomology Schubert classes. The example-based index matches indicate that the correspondence is at least consistent in low-rank cases.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and the section describing the GLSM-SQM coupling] The central claim that coupling the proposed N=2 SQM quiver to the 3d GLSM enforces restriction of the Higgs branch to the Schubert variety X_w (while the 1d degrees of freedom realize a Bott-Samelson resolution) is asserted without an explicit derivation from the Lagrangian or from the quiver data. Because the subsequent index computation is performed after this restriction is imposed, the reproduction of the double quantum Grothendieck polynomial for general w rests on an unproven step; verification only in examples does not close the gap.
  2. [The section on the 1d flavored Witten index computation] No independent geometric or algebraic verification (e.g., via localization, explicit resolution maps, or comparison with known Bott-Samelson resolutions) is supplied to confirm that the 1d SQM physically implements the resolution beyond the index match itself. This leaves the strongest claim—that the index equals the equivariant Chern character of O_{X_w}—conditional on the un-derived restriction.
minor comments (1)
  1. [The section containing the example index calculations] The notation for the double quantum Grothendieck polynomials and the precise equivariant parameters should be defined explicitly before the example computations, rather than introduced only in the verification paragraphs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We appreciate the recognition of the potential significance of the construction for quantum K-theory of flag manifolds. We address the major comments below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the derivations and verifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that coupling the proposed N=2 SQM quiver to the 3d GLSM enforces restriction of the Higgs branch to the Schubert variety X_w is asserted without an explicit derivation from the Lagrangian or from the quiver data. The reproduction of the double quantum Grothendieck polynomial for general w rests on an unproven step; verification only in examples does not close the gap.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript presents the restriction to X_w as following from the quiver construction and supersymmetric coupling but does not provide a fully explicit derivation from the Lagrangian vacuum equations. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection deriving the target-space restriction directly from the coupled 3d-1d system by analyzing the D-term and F-term equations, showing how the 1d fields impose the Schubert conditions on the Higgs branch. For the general w case we will include an argument based on the representation-theoretic structure of the flag manifold and the way the SQM quiver encodes the Bott-Samelson data, which extends the Grassmannian construction; this will be supported by the explicit low-rank examples already present. revision: yes

  2. Referee: No independent geometric or algebraic verification (e.g., via localization, explicit resolution maps, or comparison with known Bott-Samelson resolutions) is supplied to confirm that the 1d SQM physically implements the resolution beyond the index match itself. This leaves the strongest claim conditional on the un-derived restriction.

    Authors: We agree that additional independent checks would strengthen the physical interpretation. In the revision we will expand the index section to include explicit comparisons between the 1d quiver data and known Bott-Samelson resolutions for representative w, together with a discussion of how the flavored Witten index aligns with equivariant localization formulas in K-theory. While the primary evidence remains the index computation, these additions will provide a more direct link between the SQM and the geometric resolution. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on explicit construction and example verification against independent mathematical objects

full rationale

The paper introduces a new physical realization of Schubert line defects via N=2 SQM quivers coupled to 3d GLSMs for flag manifolds. It states that the insertion restricts the GLSM target to X_w while the 1d sector realizes a Bott-Samelson resolution, then separately verifies in examples that the resulting flavored Witten index equals the equivariant Chern character of O_{X_w} expressed as a double quantum Grothendieck polynomial. This match is to pre-existing algebraic objects rather than a fitted parameter or self-referential definition. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to the input assumptions, and the central claim is a new correspondence whose output is checked against external results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The construction rests on standard properties of flag manifolds and Schubert varieties from algebraic geometry, plus the usual assumptions of 3d N=2 GLSM Higgs-branch geometry; no numerical free parameters or new postulated particles are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Higgs branch of the 3d quiver gauge theory is the complete flag manifold Fl(n)
    Standard identification used throughout the GLSM literature for these theories
  • domain assumption Schubert varieties X_w admit Bott-Samelson resolutions realized by 1d quiver data
    Invoked when stating that the 1d degrees of freedom realize the resolution
invented entities (1)
  • Schubert line defects no independent evidence
    purpose: Half-BPS line operators that restrict the GLSM target space to Schubert varieties and whose indices yield quantum Grothendieck polynomials
    New objects constructed in the paper; no independent collider or experimental signature is provided

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5604 in / 1606 out tokens · 44341 ms · 2026-05-16T20:07:24.665237+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Schubert line defects in 3d GLSMs, part II: Partial flag manifolds and parabolic quantum polynomials

    hep-th 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Schubert line defects in 3d GLSMs for partial flag manifolds reproduce parabolic Whitney polynomials for Schubert classes in quantum K-theory and yield new parabolic quantum Grothendieck polynomials.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 26 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Phases of $N=2$ Theories In Two Dimensions

    E. Witten,Phases of N=2 theories in two-dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B403(1993) 159–222, [hep-th/9301042]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  2. [2]

    D. R. Morrison and M. R. Plesser,Summing the instantons: Quantum cohomology and mirror symmetry in toric varieties,Nucl. Phys. B440(1995) 279–354, [hep-th/9412236]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  3. [3]

    The equivariant A-twist and gauged linear sigma models on the two-sphere

    C. Closset, S. Cremonesi and D. S. Park,The equivariant A-twist and gauged linear sigma models on the two-sphere,JHEP06(2015) 076, [1504.06308]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    A topologically twisted index for three-dimensional supersymmetric theories

    F. Benini and A. Zaffaroni,A topologically twisted index for three-dimensional supersymmetric theories,JHEP07(2015) 127, [1504.03698]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  5. [5]

    Stable quasimaps to GIT quotients

    I. Ciocan-Fontanine, B. Kim and D. Maulik,Stable quasimaps to GIT quotients,J. Geom. Phys.75(2014) 17–47, [1106.3724]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    Stable quasimaps to holomorphic symplectic quotients

    B. Kim,Stable quasimaps to holomorphic symplectic quotients, inSchubert calculus—Osaka 2012, vol. 71 ofAdv. Stud. Pure Math., pp. 139–160. Math. Soc. Japan, [Tokyo], 2016. 1005.4125. DOI

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  7. [7]

    B. Kim, J. Oh, K. Ueda and Y. Yoshida,Residue mirror symmetry for Grassmannians, 1607.08317

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    Aspects of 3d N=2 Chern-Simons-Matter Theories

    K. Intriligator and N. Seiberg,Aspects of 3d N=2 Chern-Simons-matter theories,JHEP07 (2013) 079, [1305.1633]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  9. [9]

    Closset and O

    C. Closset and O. Khlaif,On the Witten index of 3dN= 2unitary SQCD with general CS levels,SciPost Phys.15(2023) 085, [2305.00534]

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    W. Gu, I. V. Melnikov and E. Sharpe,Quantum cohomology from mixed Higgs-Coulomb phases, JHEP02(2024) 010, [2308.12334]

    work page arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    W. Gu, L. Mihalcea, E. Sharpe and H. Zou,Quantum K theory of symplectic Grassmannians, J. Geom. Phys.177(2022) 104548, [2008.04909]

    work page arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    Closset and H

    C. Closset and H. Kim,Three-dimensionalN= 2 supersymmetric gauge theories and partition functions on Seifert manifolds: A review,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A34(2019) 1930011, [1908.08875]

    work page arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    Defects and Quantum Seiberg-Witten Geometry

    M. Bullimore, H.-C. Kim and P. Koroteev,Defects and quantum Seiberg-Witten geometry, JHEP05(2015) 095, [1412.6081]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  14. [14]

    A 3d Gauge Theory/Quantum K-Theory Correspondence

    H. Jockers and P. Mayr,A 3d gauge theory/quantum K-theory correspondence,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.24(2020) 327–457, [1808.02040]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Jockers, P

    H. Jockers, P. Mayr, U. Ninad and A. Tabler,Wilson loop algebras and quantum K-theory for Grassmannians,JHEP10(2020) 036, [1911.13286]

    work page arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Jockers and P

    H. Jockers and P. Mayr,Quantum K-theory of Calabi-Yau manifolds,JHEP11(2019) 011, [1905.03548]

    work page arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Jockers, P

    H. Jockers, P. Mayr, U. Ninad and A. Tabler,BPS indices, modularity and perturbations in quantum K-theory,JHEP02(2022) 044, [2106.07670]

    work page arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    Ueda and Y

    K. Ueda and Y. Yoshida,3dN= 2 Chern-Simons-matter theory, Bethe ansatz, and quantum K-theory of Grassmannians,JHEP08(2020) 157, [1912.03792]. – 58 –

    work page arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Koroteev, P

    P. Koroteev, P. P. Pushkar, A. V. Smirnov and A. M. Zeitlin,Quantum K-theory of quiver varieties and many-body systems,Selecta Math.27(2021) 87, [1705.10419]

    work page arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    W. Gu, L. Mihalcea, E. Sharpe and H. Zou,Quantum K theory of Grassmannians, Wilson line operators and Schur bundles,Forum Math. Sigma13(2025) e140, [2208.01091]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    W. Gu, L. Mihalcea, E. Sharpe, W. Xu, H. Zhang and H. Zou,Quantum K theory rings of partial flag manifolds,J. Geom. Phys.198(2024) 105127, [2306.11094]

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    W. Gu, L. C. Mihalcea, E. Sharpe, W. Xu, H. Zhang and H. Zou,Quantum K Whitney relations for partial flag varieties,2310.03826

    work page arXiv

  23. [23]

    W. Gu, L. C. Mihalcea, E. Sharpe, W. Xu, H. Zhang and H. Zou,A Nakayama result for the quantum K theory of homogeneous spaces, ´Epijournal de G´ eom´ etrie Alg´ ebrique9(2025) no. 25, [2507.15183]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    W. Gu, D. Pei and M. Zhang,On phases of 3d N=2 Chern-Simons-matter theories,Nucl. Phys. B973(2021) 115604, [2105.02247]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Gu,Vacuum structures revisited,2110.13156

    W. Gu,Vacuum structures revisited,2110.13156

    work page arXiv

  26. [26]

    Sharpe and H

    E. Sharpe and H. Zhang,Decomposition squared,JHEP10(2024) 168, [2405.12269]

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Dedushenko and N

    M. Dedushenko and N. Nekrasov,Interfaces and quantum algebras, II: Cigar partition function, 2306.16434

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Huq-Kuruvilla,Quantum K-rings of partial flag varieties, Coulomb branches, and the Bethe ansatz,2409.15575

    I. Huq-Kuruvilla,Quantum K-rings of partial flag varieties, Coulomb branches, and the Bethe ansatz,2409.15575

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    Huq-Kuruvilla, L

    I. Huq-Kuruvilla, L. Mihalcea, E. Sharpe and H. Zhang,Quantum K-theory levels in physics and math,2507.00116

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    Closset and O

    C. Closset and O. Khlaif,Grothendieck lines in 3dN= 2 SQCD and the quantum K-theory of the Grassmannian,JHEP12(2023) 082, [2309.06980]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    W. Gu, L. Mihalcea, E. Sharpe, W. Xu, H. Zhang and H. Zou,Schubert defects in Lagrangian Grassmannians,JHEP06(2, 2025) 148, [2502.04438]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Schubert line defects in 3d GLSMs, part II: Partial flag manifolds and parabolic quantum polynomials

    C. Closset, W. Gu, O. Khlaif, E. Sharpe, H. Zhang and H. Zou,Schubert line defects in 3d GLSMs, part II: Partial flag manifolds and parabolic quantum polynomials,2601.18881

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Witten,Supersymmetry and Morse theory,J

    E. Witten,Supersymmetry and Morse theory,J. Diff. Geom.17(1982) 661–692

    work page 1982

  34. [34]

    Bott and H

    R. Bott and H. Samelson,Applications of the theory of Morse to symmetric spaces,Amer. J. Math.80(1958) 964–1029

    work page 1958

  35. [35]

    Demazure,D´ esingularisation des vari´ et´ es de Schubert g´ en´ eralis´ ees,Annales scientifiques de l’ ´Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure4e s´ erie, 7(1974) 53–88

    M. Demazure,D´ esingularisation des vari´ et´ es de Schubert g´ en´ eralis´ ees,Annales scientifiques de l’ ´Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure4e s´ erie, 7(1974) 53–88

    work page 1974

  36. [36]

    Iezzi,Quiver Grassmannians for the Bott-Samelson resolution of type A Schubert varieties, Algebr

    G. Iezzi,Quiver Grassmannians for the Bott-Samelson resolution of type A Schubert varieties, Algebr. Represent. Theory28(2025) 1139–1158, [2502.11790]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Cibotaru,Bioriented flags and resolutions of Schubert varieties,Math

    D. Cibotaru,Bioriented flags and resolutions of Schubert varieties,Math. Nachr.293(2020) 449–474, [1810.05604]

    work page arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    A. S. Buch,Grothendieck classes of quiver varieties,Duke Math. J.115(2002) 75–103, [math/0104029]. – 59 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  39. [39]

    Fulton and A

    W. Fulton and A. Lascoux,A Pieri formula in the Grothendieck ring of a flag bundle,Duke Math. J.76(1994) 711–729

    work page 1994

  40. [40]

    Lascoux and M.-P

    A. Lascoux and M.-P. Sch¨ utzenberger,Structure de Hopf de l’anneau de cohomologie et de l’anneau de Grothendieck d’une vari´ et´ e de drapeaux,CR Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. I Math295 (1982) 629–633

    work page 1982

  41. [41]

    Lascoux,Anneau de Grothendieck de la vari´ et´ e de drapeaux, inThe Grothendieck Festschrift, Vol

    A. Lascoux,Anneau de Grothendieck de la vari´ et´ e de drapeaux, inThe Grothendieck Festschrift, Vol. III, vol. 88 ofProgr. Math., pp. 1–34. Birkh¨ auser Boston, Boston, MA, 1990. DOI

    work page 1990

  42. [42]

    Quantum Grothendieck Polynomials

    C. Lenart and T. Maeno,Quantum Grothendieck polynomials,math/0608232

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    Maeno, S

    T. Maeno, S. Naito and D. Sagaki,A presentation of the torus-equivariant quantumK-theory ring of flag manifolds of typeA, Part II: quantum double Grothendieck polynomials,Forum Math. Sigma13(2025) Paper No. e19, 26, [2305.17685]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Amini, I

    K. Amini, I. Huq-Kuruvilla, L. C. Mihalcea, D. Orr and W. Xu,Toda-type presentations for the quantum K theory of partial flag varieties,SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl.21(2025) Paper No. 098, [2504.07412]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Billey and V

    S. Billey and V. Lakshmibai,Singular loci of Schubert varieties, vol. 182 ofProgress in Mathematics. Birkh¨ auser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2000, 10.1007/978-1-4612-1324-6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1324-6 2000

  46. [46]

    The Verlinde Algebra And The Cohomology Of The Grassmannian

    E. Witten,The Verlinde algebra and the cohomology of the Grassmannian, inGeometry, topology, & physics, vol. IV ofConf. Proc. Lecture Notes Geom. Topology, pp. 357–422. Int. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.hep-th/9312104

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  47. [47]

    N. A. Nekrasov and S. L. Shatashvili,Supersymmetric vacua and Bethe ansatz,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.192-193(2009) 91–112, [0901.4744]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  48. [48]

    Comments on twisted indices in 3d supersymmetric gauge theories

    C. Closset and H. Kim,Comments on twisted indices in 3d supersymmetric gauge theories, JHEP08(2016) 059, [1605.06531]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  49. [49]

    Dimofte, W

    T. Dimofte, W. Niu and V. Py,Line operators in 3d holomorphic QFT: Meromorphic tensor categories and dg-shifted Yangians,2508.11749

    work page arXiv

  50. [50]

    Closset and J

    C. Closset and J. Wynne,Dualities and trialities inN= 2supersymmetric gauged quantum mechanics,2512.02984

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    K. Hori, H. Kim and P. Yi,Witten index and wall crossing,JHEP01(2015) 124, [1407.2567]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  52. [52]

    GLSM's for partial flag manifolds

    R. Donagi and E. Sharpe,GLSM’s for partial flag manifolds,J. Geom. Phys.58(2008) 1662–1692, [0704.1761]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  53. [53]

    Closset and O

    C. Closset and O. Khlaif,Twisted indices, Bethe ideals and 3dN= 2 infrared dualities,JHEP 05(2023) 148, [2301.10753]

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    Anderson and W

    D. Anderson and W. Fulton,Equivariant Cohomology in Algebraic Geometry. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2023

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Higher Cluster Categories and QFT Dualities

    S. Franco and G. Musiker,Higher cluster categories and QFT dualities,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 046021, [1711.01270]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  56. [56]

    Graded quivers and B-branes at Calabi-Yau singularities

    C. Closset, S. Franco, J. Guo and A. Hasan,Graded quivers and B-branes at Calabi-Yau singularities,JHEP03(2019) 053, [1811.07016]. – 60 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    Lectures on the geometry of flag varieties

    M. Brion,Lectures on the geometry of flag varieties, inTopics in cohomological studies of algebraic varieties, Trends Math., pp. 33–85. Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 2005.math/0410240. DOI

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  58. [58]

    Brion and S

    M. Brion and S. Kumar,Frobenius splitting methods in geometry and representation theory, vol. 231 ofProgress in Mathematics. Birkh¨ auser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2005

    work page 2005

  59. [59]

    A. S. Buch, A. Kresch, H. Tamvakis and A. Yong,Grothendieck polynomials and quiver formulas,Amer. J. Math.127(2005) 551–567, [math/0306389]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  60. [60]

    Fomin, S

    S. Fomin, S. Gelfand and A. Postnikov,Quantum Schubert polynomials,J. Amer. Math. Soc. 10(1997) 565–596

    work page 1997

  61. [61]

    Quantum double Schubert polynomials

    W. Fulton and P. Pragacz,Schubert varieties and degeneracy loci, vol. 1689 ofLecture Notes in Mathematics, ch. appendix J, “Quantum double Schubert polynomials” by I. Ciocan-Fontanine, W. Fulton, P. Pragacz. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998

    work page 1998

  62. [62]

    A. N. Kirillov and T. Maeno,Quantum double Schubert polynomials, quantum Schubert polynomials and Vafa–Intriligator formula,Discrete Math.217(2000) 191–223, [q-alg/9610022]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  63. [63]

    Quadrality for Supersymmetric Matrix Models

    S. Franco, S. Lee, R.-K. Seong and C. Vafa,Quadrality for supersymmetric matrix models, JHEP07(2017) 053, [1612.06859]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  64. [64]

    B-branes and supersymmetric quivers in 2d

    C. Closset, J. Guo and E. Sharpe,B-branes and supersymmetric quivers in 2d,JHEP02(2018) 051, [1711.10195]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  65. [65]

    Lascoux and M.-P

    A. Lascoux and M.-P. Sch¨ utzenberger,Polynˆ omes de Schubert,C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. I Math.294(1982) 447–450

    work page 1982

  66. [66]

    Macdonald,Notes on Schubert Polynomials, vol

    I. Macdonald,Notes on Schubert Polynomials, vol. 6. Publications du LaCIM, Laboratoire de combinatoire et d’informatique math´ ematique (LaCIM), Universit´ e du Qu´ ebec ` a Montr´ eal, 1991

    work page 1991

  67. [67]

    Fulton,Flags, Schubert polynomials, degeneracy loci, and determinantal formulas,Duke Math

    W. Fulton,Flags, Schubert polynomials, degeneracy loci, and determinantal formulas,Duke Math. J.65(1992) 381–420

    work page 1992

  68. [68]

    Lascoux and M.-P

    A. Lascoux and M.-P. Sch¨ utzenberger,Symmetry and flag manifolds, inInvariant theory (Montecatini, 1982), vol. 996 ofLecture Notes in Math., pp. 118–144. Springer, Berlin, 1983. DOI

    work page 1982

  69. [69]

    Quantum double Schubert polynomials represent Schubert classes

    T. Lam and M. Shimozono,Quantum double Schubert polynomials represent Schubert classes, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.142(2014) 835–850, [1108.4958]. – 61 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014