arxiv: 2601.22503 · v1 · submitted 2026-01-30 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Quantum-Enhanced Sensing Enabled by Scrambling-Induced Genuine Multipartite Entanglement

Guantian Hu , Wenxuan Zhang , Zhihua Chen , Liuzhu Zhong , Jingchao Zhao , Chilong Liu , Zixing Liu , Yue Xu

show 11 more authors

Yongchang Lin Yougui Ri Guixu Xie Mingze Liu Haolan Yuan Yuxuan Zhou Yu Zhang Chang-Kang Hu Song Liu Dian Tan Dapeng Yu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 09:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords quantum sensingmany-body scramblingmultipartite entanglementout-of-time-order correlatorButterfly MetrologyHeisenberg limitsuperconducting qubitsquantum metrology

0 comments

The pith

Scrambling-induced genuine multipartite entanglement enables quantum sensing beyond the standard quantum limit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors present an experimental demonstration of Butterfly Metrology, a protocol that uses many-body information scrambling to achieve quantum-enhanced phase sensing. Working with up to 10 qubits on a superconducting processor, they measure sensitivity improvements that exceed the standard quantum limit and scale in a manner consistent with half the Heisenberg limit. The work directly connects this performance to the growth of out-of-time-order correlators and the emergence of genuine multipartite entanglement generated by the scrambling dynamics. This method avoids the need for preparing specific entangled states or engineering Hamiltonians, pointing toward a more universal approach for quantum metrology in interacting systems.

Core claim

We report the experimental realization of Butterfly Metrology on a superconducting quantum processor. By exploiting many-body information scrambling, quantum-enhanced sensitivity to an encoded phase is observed beyond the standard quantum limit, with a scaling consistent with a factor-of-two of the Heisenberg limit for system sizes of up to 10 qubits. The buildup of scrambling-induced genuine multipartite entanglement is shown to underlie the observed sensitivity enhancement, with a direct connection established to the dynamics of the out-of-time-order correlator.

What carries the argument

The Butterfly Metrology protocol, which leverages many-body scrambling to generate genuine multipartite entanglement as the resource for enhanced phase estimation.

If this is right

Phase sensitivity exceeds the standard quantum limit without preparing complex entangled states in advance.
Performance scales consistently with half the Heisenberg limit for systems up to 10 qubits.
Out-of-time-order correlator dynamics correlate with the sensitivity enhancement.
Genuine multipartite entanglement induced by scrambling is the key underlying resource.
The protocol is universal and applicable to scalable interacting many-body systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If scrambling can be controlled in larger systems, the approach may reach closer to the full Heisenberg limit.
Similar techniques could be tested in other quantum hardware platforms exhibiting scrambling behavior.
This links metrology to information scrambling, potentially informing protocols in quantum computing where scrambling occurs naturally.

Load-bearing premise

The observed quantum-enhanced sensitivity arises specifically from the scrambling-induced genuine multipartite entanglement rather than from other unaccounted quantum resources or hardware-specific effects.

What would settle it

If an experiment suppresses the scrambling while preserving the interaction strength and measures no sensitivity improvement beyond the standard quantum limit, the claim would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.22503 by Chang-Kang Hu, Chilong Liu, Dapeng Yu, Dian Tan, Guantian Hu, Guixu Xie, Haolan Yuan, Jingchao Zhao, Liuzhu Zhong, Mingze Liu, Song Liu, Wenxuan Zhang, Yongchang Lin, Yougui Ri, Yue Xu, Yuxuan Zhou, Yu Zhang, Zhihua Chen, Zixing Liu.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of the butterfly metrology protocol. (a) The superconducting quantum processor. The subsets of qubits [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Characterization of the OTOC and the scrambling-induced entanglement. (a) Quantum circuit for measuring the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Quantum sensing of the phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. The sensitivity of the protocol. (a) The inverted sensitivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Schematic diagram of the setup. filters at the 10 mK stage to block reflected signals and noise from higher temperature stages. The output signal is amplified by a high electron mobility transistor (HEMT) amplifier at the 4 K stage, followed by further amplification with a room temperature amplifier. A detailed overview of the wiring and electronics setup is presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Flux pulse distortion calibration experiment. (a) The pulse sequence used in the experiment. Z [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Calibration of arbitrary-angle Z rotation. (a) Pulse sequence consisting of two X/2 gates separated by M = 5 identical Z segments. (b) Measured excited-state population as a function of Zamp, yielding a Ramsey fringe. (c) The data are fitted and interpolated to determine the pulse amplitude required to implement an arbitrary target Z-rotation angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Calibration of effective coupling strength. (a) Population of the designated qubit versus Zampof the coupler and evolution time. (b) Effective coupling strength extracted from (a) as a function of Zamp of the coupler. C. Calibration of effective coupling strength We adopt the Qubit-Coupler-Qubit(QCQ) architecture to implement tunable coupling between nearest-neighbor qubits. In this architecture, the effec… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Pulse sequence used in our quantum sensing experiment. (a) Implementation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Single-shot measurement results. (a) IQ clusters and (b) corresponding histograms for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Experiment result without and with normalization procedure. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Numerical simulation results without noise. (a) Expectation value of the observable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Numerical simulation results with noise. (a) Expectation value of the observable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Quantum sensing leverages quantum resources to surpass the standard quantum limit, yet many existing protocols rely on the preparation of complex entangled states and Hamiltonian engineering, posing challenges for universality and scalability. Here, we report an experimental realization of a universal protocol, known as Butterfly Metrology, proposed in [arXiv:2411.12794], demonstrating a scrambling-based approach for quantum-enhanced sensing on a superconducting quantum processor. By exploiting many-body information scrambling, we observe quantum-enhanced sensitivity to an encoded phase beyond the standard quantum limit, with a scaling consistent with a factor-of-two of the Heisenberg limit for system sizes of up to 10 qubits. Importantly, we experimentally establish a connection between the enhanced sensitivity and the dynamics of the out-of-time-order correlator (OTOC), and show that the buildup of scrambling-induced genuine multipartite entanglement underlies the observed sensitivity enhancement. Our results demonstrate a scalable and practical approach for quantum-enhanced sensing in interacting many-body quantum systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Hardware demo of Butterfly Metrology on 10 qubits shows scaling past SQL with OTOC correlation, but the GME causality claim lacks isolating controls.

read the letter

Dear colleague, the core result here is a working implementation of the Butterfly Metrology protocol on a superconducting processor with up to 10 qubits. They measure phase sensitivity beyond the standard quantum limit, with scaling that tracks roughly a factor of two from the Heisenberg limit, and they report a correlation between that gain and out-of-time-order correlator decay plus genuine multipartite entanglement growth from scrambling. That is the concrete experimental step forward. The protocol itself was proposed earlier, so the new piece is the hardware run plus the direct OTOC and GME measurements on the same device. They avoid the usual overhead of preparing specific entangled states and instead let the natural scrambling dynamics do the work, which is a practical advantage for interacting systems. The scaling data across qubit numbers is the part that looks most useful to see in detail. The main limitation is that the causal story still rests on correlation. The abstract links the sensitivity boost to scrambling-induced GME, but there is no control that keeps the qubit count, connectivity, and readout fixed while turning scrambling off or down. Without that, pairwise entanglement, single-qubit effects, or hardware-specific behavior could contribute to the observed gain. The interpretation is plausible from the data they show, but it is not yet isolated. This paper is aimed at people working on quantum sensing who are interested in many-body routes and at condensed-matter groups studying scrambling. A reader who wants to see how OTOC dynamics translate into metrology numbers would find the experimental traces worth looking at. I would send it for peer review. The hardware demonstration and scaling results are substantial enough to deserve referee time on the methods and data, even if the mechanistic attribution would benefit from tighter controls.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental implementation of the Butterfly Metrology protocol on a superconducting quantum processor. It claims observation of quantum-enhanced phase sensitivity beyond the standard quantum limit, with scaling approaching a factor of two of the Heisenberg limit for system sizes up to 10 qubits. The authors link this enhancement to out-of-time-order correlator (OTOC) dynamics and attribute it to the buildup of scrambling-induced genuine multipartite entanglement.

Significance. If the causal role of scrambling-induced GME is confirmed through appropriate controls, the work would provide a scalable, universal route to quantum-enhanced sensing in many-body systems that avoids the need for tailored entangled-state preparation or Hamiltonian engineering, with potential impact on practical metrology.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that 'the buildup of scrambling-induced genuine multipartite entanglement underlies the observed sensitivity enhancement' rests on observed correlation between OTOC decay and sensitivity gain. No control experiments are described that suppress scrambling (e.g., via integrable or non-chaotic interactions while preserving qubit count, connectivity, and readout) to isolate GME from pairwise entanglement, residual coherence, or hardware-specific effects.
[Abstract] The reported scaling 'consistent with a factor-of-two of the Heisenberg limit' for N up to 10 is presented only for the scrambling protocol. Without comparative data under non-scrambling conditions or explicit exclusion criteria for data points, the attribution of the scaling to GME remains correlational rather than causal.

minor comments (2)

The manuscript should include full datasets, error bars, and statistical details for the sensitivity measurements and OTOC traces to allow independent verification of the scaling claims.
Clarify the precise definition and experimental extraction of the GME measure used to support the attribution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, providing additional clarification and making targeted revisions to strengthen the evidence presented for the role of scrambling-induced genuine multipartite entanglement.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that 'the buildup of scrambling-induced genuine multipartite entanglement underlies the observed sensitivity enhancement' rests on observed correlation between OTOC decay and sensitivity gain. No control experiments are described that suppress scrambling (e.g., via integrable or non-chaotic interactions while preserving qubit count, connectivity, and readout) to isolate GME from pairwise entanglement, residual coherence, or hardware-specific effects.

Authors: We acknowledge that direct experimental controls suppressing scrambling (while preserving qubit count, connectivity, and readout) would provide stronger causal isolation of GME. On the superconducting processor, the fixed interaction Hamiltonian makes implementing integrable or non-chaotic dynamics with equivalent fidelity challenging without altering the device parameters. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated discussion subsection that (i) quantifies lower-order entanglement witnesses to bound the pairwise contribution, (ii) shows that sensitivity reverts to the SQL precisely when OTOC decay is suppressed by detuning, and (iii) references the theoretical prediction of the Butterfly Metrology protocol that GME is required for the observed scaling. These additions make the correlational evidence more robust while transparently noting the hardware limitation. revision: partial
Referee: [Abstract] The reported scaling 'consistent with a factor-of-two of the Heisenberg limit' for N up to 10 is presented only for the scrambling protocol. Without comparative data under non-scrambling conditions or explicit exclusion criteria for data points, the attribution of the scaling to GME remains correlational rather than causal.

Authors: The scaling is reported for the Butterfly Metrology protocol, which by design requires scrambling to generate the GME resource. We have revised the manuscript to include (i) explicit data-exclusion criteria based on readout fidelity and OTOC threshold in the Methods section and (ii) a supplementary theoretical plot comparing the expected scaling with and without scrambling. While we do not present experimental data for a non-scrambling Hamiltonian on this hardware, the protocol theory and our OTOC-sensitivity correlation demonstrate that the factor-of-two Heisenberg scaling appears only when GME builds up. This grounds the attribution in both experiment and the underlying framework rather than pure correlation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Protocol cited from prior work; experimental measurements of sensitivity and OTOC provide independent content

full rationale

The paper reports new experimental data on a superconducting processor for N up to 10 qubits, including measured phase sensitivity scaling and OTOC dynamics. The protocol itself is referenced to arXiv:2411.12794, but this is a standard citation for the method rather than a load-bearing reduction of the central experimental claims. No equations or derivations in the provided text reduce by construction to fitted inputs or self-citations; the sensitivity enhancement and its correlation with OTOC are presented as direct observations. This qualifies as minor self-citation that does not render the result tautological.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum mechanics for superconducting qubits, the validity of the Butterfly Metrology protocol from the cited paper, and the interpretation that OTOC measures scrambling-induced entanglement. No new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

standard math Standard quantum mechanics and superconducting qubit Hamiltonian dynamics
Invoked throughout as the background for the experiment and OTOC definition.
domain assumption The Butterfly Metrology protocol from arXiv:2411.12794 produces the claimed sensitivity scaling
The experimental results are interpreted as confirmation of that prior proposal.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5531 in / 1422 out tokens · 37025 ms · 2026-05-16T09:46:53.217037+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

we experimentally establish a connection between the enhanced sensitivity and the dynamics of the out-of-time-order correlator (OTOC), and show that the buildup of scrambling-induced genuine multipartite entanglement underlies the observed sensitivity enhancement
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the protocol realizes the butterfly state, which forms a coherent superposition of two distinct branches acquiring macroscopically different phases. The resulting Ramsey-like phase accumulation of N ϕ/2

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Network-Mediated Capacitive Coupling Drives Fast OTOC Saturation in Superconducting Circuits
quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Network-mediated capacitive couplings in transmon arrays accelerate OTOC saturation and produce intermediate spectral statistics between Poisson and GOE limits.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Improving metrology with quantum scrambling,

Zeyang Li, Simone Colombo, Chi Shu, Gustavo Velez, Saúl Pilatowsky-Cameo, Roman Schmied, Soonwon Choi, Mikhail Lukin, Edwin Pedrozo-Peñaﬁel, and Vladan Vuletić, “Improving metrology with quantum scrambling,” Science 380, 1381–1384 (2023)

work page 2023
[2]

Enhanced quantum frequency estimation by nonlinear scrambling,

Victor Montenegro, Sara Dornetti, Alessandro Ferraro, and Matteo G. A. Paris, “Enhanced quantum frequency estimation by nonlinear scrambling,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 030802 (2025)

work page 2025
[3]

Quantum sensing,

C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, “Quantum sensing,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017)

work page 2017
[4]

Quantum-enhanced measurements without entanglement,

Daniel Braun, Gerardo Adesso, Fabio Benatti, Roberto Floreanini, Ugo Marzolino, Morgan W. Mitchell, and Stefano Pirandola, “Quantum-enhanced measurements without entanglement,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 035006 (2018)

work page 2018
[5]

Quantum metrology,

Vittorio Giovannetti, Seth Lloyd, and Lorenzo Mac- cone, “Quantum metrology,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 010401 (2006)

work page 2006
[6]

Quantum-enhanced measurements: Beating the stan- dard quantum limit,

Vittorio Giovannetti, Seth Lloyd, and Lorenzo Maccone, “Quantum-enhanced measurements: Beating the stan- dard quantum limit,” Science 306, 1330–1336 (2004)

work page 2004
[7]

Beating the standard quantum limit under ambient conditions with solid-state spins,

Tianyu Xie, Zhiyuan Zhao, Xi Kong, Wenchao Ma, Mengqi Wang, Xiangyu Ye, Pei Yu, Zhiping Yang, Shaoyi Xu, Pengfei Wang, Ya Wang, Fazhan Shi, and Jiangfeng Du, “Beating the standard quantum limit under ambient conditions with solid-state spins,” Science Advances 7, eabg9204 (2021)

work page 2021
[8]

Toward heisenberg-limited spectroscopy with multiparticle entangled states,

D. Leibfried, M. D. Barrett, T. Schaetz, J. Britton, J. Chiaverini, W. M. Itano, J. D. Jost, C. Langer, and D. J. Wineland, “Toward heisenberg-limited spectroscopy with multiparticle entangled states,” Science 304, 1476– 1478 (2004)

work page 2004
[9]

Squeezed states in phase-sensing interferometers,

Roy S. Bondurant and Jeﬀrey H. Shapiro, “Squeezed states in phase-sensing interferometers,” Phys. Rev. D 30, 2548–2556 (1984)

work page 1984
[10]

Deterministic squeezed states with collective measurements and feedback,

Kevin C. Cox, Graham P. Greve, Joshua M. Weiner, and James K. Thompson, “Deterministic squeezed states with collective measurements and feedback,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 093602 (2016) . 6

work page 2016
[11]

Quantum sensing with squeezed light,

B. J. Lawrie, P. D. Lett, A. M. Marino, and R. C. Pooser, “Quantum sensing with squeezed light,” ACS Photonics 6, 1307–1318 (2019)

work page 2019
[12]

Distributed quantum sensing with mode-entangled spin-squeezed atomic states,

Benjamin K. Malia, Yunfan Wu, Julián Martínez-Rincón, and Mark A. Kasevich, “Distributed quantum sensing with mode-entangled spin-squeezed atomic states,” Na- ture 612, 661–665 (2022)

work page 2022
[13]

Quantum-enhanced sensing by echoing spin- nematic squeezing in atomic Bose–Einstein condensate,

Tian-Wei Mao, Qi Liu, Xin-Wei Li, Jia-Hao Cao, Feng Chen, Wen-Xin Xu, Meng Khoon Tey, Yi-Xiao Huang, and Li You, “Quantum-enhanced sensing by echoing spin- nematic squeezing in atomic Bose–Einstein condensate,” Nature Physics 19, 1585–1590 (2023)

work page 2023
[14]

High- noon states by mixing quantum and classical light,

Itai Afek, Oron Ambar, and Yaron Silberberg, “High- noon states by mixing quantum and classical light,” Sci- ence 328, 879–881 (2010)

work page 2010
[15]

Supersensitive polarization microscopy using noon states of light,

Yonatan Israel, Shamir Rosen, and Yaron Silber- berg, “Supersensitive polarization microscopy using noon states of light,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 103604 (2014)

work page 2014
[16]

Magnetic ﬁeld sensing beyond the standard quantum limit using 10-spin noon states,

Jonathan A. Jones, Steven D. Karlen, Joseph Fitzsimons, Arzhang Ardavan, Simon C. Benjamin, G. Andrew D. Briggs, and John J. L. Morton, “Magnetic ﬁeld sensing beyond the standard quantum limit using 10-spin noon states,” Science 324, 1166–1168 (2009)

work page 2009
[17]

At the limits of criticality-based quantum metrology: Apparent super- heisenberg scaling revisited,

Marek M. Rams, Piotr Sierant, Omyoti Dutta, Paweł Horodecki, and Jakub Zakrzewski, “At the limits of criticality-based quantum metrology: Apparent super- heisenberg scaling revisited,” Phys. Rev. X 8, 021022 (2018)

work page 2018
[18]

Quantum-enhanced sensing by echoing spin- nematic squeezing in atomic bose–einstein condensate,

Tian-Wei Mao, Qi Liu, Xin-Wei Li, Jia-Hao Cao, Feng Chen, Wen-Xin Xu, Meng Khoon Tey, Yi-Xiao Huang, and Li You, “Quantum-enhanced sensing by echoing spin- nematic squeezing in atomic bose–einstein condensate,” Nature Physics 19, 1585–1590 (2023)

work page 2023
[19]

En- hanced metrology at the critical point of a many-body rydberg atomic system,

Dong-Sheng Ding, Zong-Kai Liu, Bao-Sen Shi, Guang- Can Guo, Klaus Mølmer, and Charles S Adams, “En- hanced metrology at the critical point of a many-body rydberg atomic system,” Nature Physics 18, 1447–1452 (2022)

work page 2022
[20]

Generation of genuine entangle- ment up to 51 superconducting qubits,

Sirui Cao, Bujiao Wu, Fusheng Chen, Ming Gong, Yulin Wu, Yangsen Ye, Chen Zha, Haoran Qian, Chong Ying, Shaojun Guo, et al. , “Generation of genuine entangle- ment up to 51 superconducting qubits,” Nature 619, 738– 742 (2023)

work page 2023
[21]

10-qubit entanglement and parallel logic operations with a superconducting cir- cuit,

Chao Song, Kai Xu, Wuxin Liu, Chui-ping Yang, Shi- Biao Zheng, Hui Deng, Qiwei Xie, Keqiang Huang, Qiu- jiang Guo, Libo Zhang, Pengfei Zhang, Da Xu, Dongn- ing Zheng, Xiaobo Zhu, H. Wang, Y.-A. Chen, C.-Y. Lu, Siyuan Han, and Jian-Wei Pan, “10-qubit entanglement and parallel logic operations with a superconducting cir- cuit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180511 (2017)

work page 2017
[22]

Ef- ﬁcient tools for quantum metrology with uncorrelated noise,

Jan Kołodyński and Rafał Demkowicz-Dobrzański, “Ef- ﬁcient tools for quantum metrology with uncorrelated noise,” New Journal of Physics 15, 073043 (2013)

work page 2013
[23]

The elusive Heisenberg limit in quantum- enhanced metrology,

Rafał Demkowicz-Dobrzański, Jan Kołodyński, and Mădălin Guţă, “The elusive Heisenberg limit in quantum- enhanced metrology,” Nature Communications 3, 1063 (2012)

work page 2012
[24]

Information scrambling in quantum circuits,

Xiao Mi, Pedram Roushan, Chris Quintana, Salvatore Mandrà, Jeﬀrey Marshall, Charles Neill, Frank Arute, Kunal Arya, Juan Atalaya, Ryan Babbush, Joseph C. Bardin, Rami Barends, Joao Basso, Andreas Bengtsson, Sergio Boixo, Alexandre Bourassa, Michael Broughton, Bob B. Buckley, David A. Buell, Brian Burkett, Nicholas Bushnell, Zijun Chen, Benjamin Chiaro, Ro...

work page 2021
[25]

Probing operator spreading via ﬂoquet en- gineering in a superconducting circuit,

S. K. Zhao, Zi-Yong Ge, Zhongcheng Xiang, G. M. Xue, H. S. Yan, Z. T. Wang, Zhan Wang, H. K. Xu, F. F. Su, Z. H. Yang, He Zhang, Yu-Ran Zhang, Xue-Yi Guo, Kai Xu, Ye Tian, H. F. Yu, D. N. Zheng, Heng Fan, and S. P. Zhao, “Probing operator spreading via ﬂoquet en- gineering in a superconducting circuit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 160602 (2022)

work page 2022
[26]

Quantum information scram- bling on a superconducting qutrit processor,

M. S. Blok, V. V. Ramasesh, T. Schuster, K. O’Brien, J. M. Kreikebaum, D. Dahlen, A. Morvan, B. Yoshida, N. Y. Yao, and I. Siddiqi, “Quantum information scram- bling on a superconducting qutrit processor,” Phys. Rev. X 11, 021010 (2021)

work page 2021
[27]

Probing quantum in- formation propagation with out-of-time-ordered correla- tors,

Jochen Braumüller, Amir H Karamlou, Yariv Yanay, Bharath Kannan, David Kim, Morten Kjaergaard, Alexander Melville, Bethany M Niedzielski, Youngkyu Sung, Antti Vepsäläinen, et al. , “Probing quantum in- formation propagation with out-of-time-ordered correla- tors,” Nature Physics 18, 172–178 (2022)

work page 2022
[28]

Mea- suring out-of-time-order correlators on a nuclear mag- netic resonance quantum simulator,

Jun Li, Ruihua Fan, Hengyan Wang, Bingtian Ye, Bei Zeng, Hui Zhai, Xinhua Peng, and Jiangfeng Du, “Mea- suring out-of-time-order correlators on a nuclear mag- netic resonance quantum simulator,” Phys. Rev. X 7, 031011 (2017)

work page 2017
[29]

Veriﬁed quan- tum information scrambling,

K. A. Landsman, C. Figgatt, T. Schuster, N. M. Linke, B. Yoshida, N. Y. Yao, and C. Monroe, “Veriﬁed quan- tum information scrambling,” Nature 567, 61–65 (2019)

work page 2019
[30]

Quantum information scram- bling in a trapped-ion quantum simulator with tunable range interactions,

Manoj K. Joshi, Andreas Elben, Benoît Vermersch, Tiﬀ Brydges, Christine Maier, Peter Zoller, Rainer Blatt, and Christian F. Roos, “Quantum information scram- bling in a trapped-ion quantum simulator with tunable range interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 240505 (2020)

work page 2020
[31]

Measuring out-of-time-order correlations and mul- tiple quantum spectra in a trapped-ion quantum mag- net,

Martin Gärttner, Justin G Bohnet, Arghavan Safavi- Naini, Michael L Wall, John J Bollinger, and Ana Maria Rey, “Measuring out-of-time-order correlations and mul- tiple quantum spectra in a trapped-ion quantum mag- net,” Nature Physics 13, 781–786 (2017)

work page 2017
[32]

Obser- vation of anomalous information scrambling in a rydberg atom array,

Xinhui Liang, Zongpei Yue, Yu-Xin Chao, Zhen-Xing Hua, Yige Lin, Meng Khoon Tey, and Li You, “Obser- vation of anomalous information scrambling in a rydberg atom array,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 050201 (2025) . 7

work page 2025
[33]

A universal protocol for quantum-enhanced sensing via information scrambling,

Bryce Kobrin, Thomas Schuster, Maxwell Block, Weijie Wu, Bradley Mitchell, Emily Davis, and Norman Y. Yao, “A universal protocol for quantum-enhanced sensing via information scrambling,” (2024), arXiv:2411.12794 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[34]

Qubit architecture with high coherence and fast tunable cou- pling,

Yu Chen, C. Neill, P. Roushan, N. Leung, M. Fang, R. Barends, J. Kelly, B. Campbell, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, E. Jeﬀrey, A. Megrant, J. Y. Mu- tus, P. J. J. O’Malley, C. M. Quintana, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, T. C. White, Michael R. Geller, A. N. Cleland, and John M. Martinis, “Qubit architecture with high coherence and fast tunable cou...

work page 2014
[35]

Fast tunable coupler for superconducting qubits,

R. C. Bialczak, M. Ansmann, M. Hofheinz, M. Lenan- der, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, A. D. O’Connell, D. Sank, H. Wang, M. Weides, J. Wenner, T. Yamamoto, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, “Fast tunable coupler for superconducting qubits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 060501 (2011)

work page 2011
[36]

A bound on chaos,

Juan Maldacena, Stephen H. Shenker, and Douglas Stan- ford, “A bound on chaos,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2016, 106 (2016)

work page 2016
[37]

Measure of genuine multipartite entanglement with computable lower bounds,

Zhi-Hao Ma, Zhi-Hua Chen, Jing-Ling Chen, Christoph Spengler, Andreas Gabriel, and Marcus Huber, “Measure of genuine multipartite entanglement with computable lower bounds,” Phys. Rev. A 83, 062325 (2011)

work page 2011
[38]

Improved lower bounds on genuine- multipartite-entanglement concurrence,

Zhi-Hua Chen, Zhi-Hao Ma, Jing-Ling Chen, and Si- mone Severini, “Improved lower bounds on genuine- multipartite-entanglement concurrence,” Phys. Rev. A 85, 062320 (2012)

work page 2012
[39]

Statisti- cal distance and the geometry of quantum states,

Samuel L. Braunstein and Carlton M. Caves, “Statisti- cal distance and the geometry of quantum states,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3439–3443 (1994)

work page 1994
[40]

Quantum estimation for quan- tum technology,

MATTEO G. A. PARIS, “Quantum estimation for quan- tum technology,” International Journal of Quantum In- formation 07, 125–137 (2009)

work page 2009
[41]

Quantum noise limited and entanglement-assisted magnetometry,

W. Wasilewski, K. Jensen, H. Krauter, J. J. Renema, M. V. Balabas, and E. S. Polzik, “Quantum noise limited and entanglement-assisted magnetometry,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 133601 (2010)

work page 2010
[42]

Information-scrambling- enhanced quantum sensing beyond the standard quan- tum limit,

Yangyang Ge, Haoyu Zhou, Wen Zheng, Xiang-Min Yu, Wei Fang, Zhenchuan Zhang, Wanli Huang, Xiang Deng, Haoyang Cai, Xianke Li, Kun Zhou, Hanxin Che, Tao Zhang, Lichang Ji, Yu Zhang, Jie Zhao, Shao-Xiong Li, Xinsheng Tan, and Yang Yu, “Information-scrambling- enhanced quantum sensing beyond the standard quan- tum limit,” arXiv:2512.21157 (2025) . Quantum-En...

work page arXiv 2025
[43]

(19) Within the Haar-random unitary approximation, the mean of the polarization distribution is zero, yielding η−1 ϕ=0 = N

aroundϕ= 0, we obtain ⟨V⟩ ≃ϕ         N 2 − ∑ S z S zP(S z)        . (19) Within the Haar-random unitary approximation, the mean of the polarization distribution is zero, yielding η−1 ϕ=0 = N

work page
[44]

Hence, we establish a direct connection between the phase sensitivity of the butterﬂy protocol and information scrambling in the system

(20) Alternatively, noting thatσz i |0⟩= |0⟩, the sensitivity can also be written in the following form: η−1 ϕ=0 = 1 2 ∑ i [ 1 − ⟨0|V(t)σz i V(t)σz i |0⟩ ] , (21) where ⟨0|V(t)σz i V(t)σz i |0⟩is precisely a local OTOC. Hence, we establish a direct connection between the phase sensitivity of the butterﬂy protocol and information scrambling in the system. ...

work page
[45]

The simulations show that the inverted sensitivityη−1 increases with the evolution time

Figure 8(a) displays the observable ⟨σx⟩as a function of the evolution time and the sensing phase for diﬀerent system sizes (N = 6, 8, 10). The simulations show that the inverted sensitivityη−1 increases with the evolution time. The sensitivity eventually saturates once the system reaches the full scrambling regime. In addition, the numerical results indi...

work page
[46]

F. Bao, H. Deng, D. Ding, R. Gao, X. Gao, C. Huang, X. Jiang, H.-S. Ku, Z. Li, X. Ma, X. Ni, J. Qin, Z. Song, H. Sun, C. Tang, T. Wang, F. Wu, T. Xia, W. Y u, F. Zhang, G. Zhang, X. Zhang, J. Zhou, X. Zhu, Y . Shi, J. Chen, H.-H. Zhao, and C. Deng, Fluxonium: An alternative qubit platform for high-ﬁdelity operations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 010502 (2022)

work page 2022
[47]

F. Y an, P . Krantz, Y . Sung, M. Kjaergaard, D. L. Campbell, T. P . Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Tunable coupling scheme for implementing high-ﬁdelity two-qubit gates, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 054062 (2018)

work page 2018
[48]

Braum ¨uller, A

J. Braum ¨uller, A. H. Karamlou, Y . Y anay, B. Kannan, D. Kim, M. Kjaergaard, A. Melville, B. M. Niedzielski, Y . Sung, A. V eps ¨al¨ainen, et al., Probing quantum information propagation with out-of-time-ordered correlators, Nature Physics 18, 172 (2022)

work page 2022
[49]

Leibfried, M

D. Leibfried, M. D. Barrett, T. Schaetz, J. Britton, J. Chiaverini, W. M. Itano, J. D. Jost, C. Langer, and D. J. Wineland, Toward heisenberg- limited spectroscopy with multiparticle entangled states, Science 304, 1476 (2004)

work page 2004