Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 59 references

A 64-element log-periodic dipole array arranged in a diamond, or tilted-square, configuration has been commissioned and, in its first seven months, has detected five bright pulsars and a solar flare, demonstrating that small, low-cost array

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 05:55 UTC pith:VJ5LG4IC

load-bearing objection The array works and the empirical detections are credible, but the projected sensitivity numbers in §6 are off by roughly a factor of ten, which inflates the paper's claims about future pulsar yields. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2602.00677 v1 pith:VJ5LG4IC submitted 2026-01-31 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.HE

GBD-DART-I : Pulsars and transient source observation between 130 MHz and 350 MHz at Gauribidanur

Arul Pandian B , Joydeep Bagchi , Prabu Thiagaraj , K.B.Raghavendra Rao , Vinutha Chandrashekar , R Abhishek , Arasi Sathyamurthy , Sandhya
show 3 more authors
Sahana Bhattramakki Kasturi S Shiv Sethi
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.IM astro-ph.HE
keywords log-periodic dipole arrayaperture arraypulsar observationsolar radio flareslow-frequency radio astronomysidelobe suppressiontransit radio telescoperadio astronomy education
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reports the design, construction, and first results of a small low-frequency radio array: 64 log-periodic dipole antennas arranged in a tilted-square 'diamond' pattern. The authors argue that this configuration, with dual-polarized pairs tilted toward one another in a checkerboard layout, gives nearly flat gain across 130-350 MHz and suppresses sidelobes in the east-west and north-south directions. In its first seven months of operation, the single tile detected five bright pulsars and an intense solar flare, with recovered pulsar dispersion measures and pulse profiles matching catalogued values. The aim is two-fold: to study bright pulsars and solar transients at low frequencies, and to offer a low-cost, easily duplicated instrument for hands-on radio astronomy training. If the full-array performance matches the simulations, planned upgrades (wider bandwidth, additional tiles) would bring sensitivity down to about 50 mJy.

Core claim

The central claim is that the diamond-shaped (45°-rotated square) checkerboard arrangement of dual-tilted log-periodic dipole pairs yields a sidelobe-suppressed, near-flat-gain beam across 130-350 MHz, and that a single fully-commissioned tile operating in transit mode detects bright pulsars and solar flares end-to-end. As evidence, the paper presents satellite and solar transit beam measurements (on an 8-dipole subgroup) that match simulated side-lobe levels near -20 dB, a multi-day drift scan consistent with sky-temperature projections, detection of an intense solar type III burst whose timing and morphology match an independent solar spectrograph, and detection of five pulsars whose perio

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the diamond array configuration: a square aperture rotated 45°, with 64 LPDAs arranged as dual-polarized pairs in a checkerboard layout, each pair inclined 23° from zenith toward its partner. This geometry is simulated to flatten gain across the band and to reject sidelobes in the east-west and north-south directions, which is what allows pulsar scans to remain clean even when the Sun or other bright sources are in the sky. The supporting signal chain is a custom analog and fiber-optic path (feed-point LNAs, two-stage combiners, a 130-350 MHz amplifier with 1.2 dB noise figure, RF-over-fiber to the receiver room, and a 16 MHz dual-channel digitiser) followed by st

Load-bearing premise

The full-array performance rests on electromagnetic simulations of the 64-LPDA tile (gain near 22 dBi, SEFD near 25 kJy, sidelobe suppression), while only the 8-dipole subgroup beam has been verified in the field against satellite and solar transits.

What would settle it

Point the full tile at a strong isolated source such as Cygnus-A and compare the measured beam pattern, gain, and system temperature against the simulated 22 dBi gain and 25 kJy SEFD; a substantial shortfall would invalidate the projected 50 mJy sensitivity of the upgraded array.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A single, relatively small (5.9 m x 5.9 m) tile can routinely detect bright pulsars and solar flares, so the array is already functional for low-frequency time-domain astronomy.
  • The measured subgroup beam's side-lobe suppression confirms that the diamond layout can keep pulsar transit observations clean even with the Sun or strong continuum sources present.
  • Recovered pulsar periods and dispersion measures matching catalogues demonstrate that the array's frequency and timing calibration is sound, making it usable for monitoring efforts.
  • Projected upgrades (two tiles, wider instantaneous bandwidth) would lower the detection threshold to roughly 50 mJy, adding many more pulsars to the observable sample.
  • Because the design is low-cost, reproducible, and remotely operable, it can be replicated as a training instrument at other sites.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the full-tile beam behaves as simulated, the diamond/tilted-pair idea could be scaled to larger low-frequency arrays, providing a cheaper route to bright-source monitoring and solar transient studies than current large instruments.
  • The array's round-the-clock spectral archival data is a resource for long-term solar flare statistics that does not require dedicated observing time.
  • The time-delay beamforming and multiple-beam possibilities sketched in the paper could turn the tile into a small transient search instrument, complementing fast radio burst and scintillation studies at higher frequencies.
  • A chain of such inexpensive tiles across longitudes could give continuous pulsar monitoring coverage, useful for timing-array follow-up or interstellar medium studies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper describes the design, construction, and commissioning of GBD-DART, a 64-LPDA dual-polarized array operating at 130–350 MHz at the Gauribidanur Observatory. It presents CST simulations of single LPDAs, pairs, and the diamond-shaped array; the analog signal chain (LNAs, combining, RF-over-fiber, PDR digitiser); and commissioning results: ORBCOMM satellite and Sun transits to verify the beam, multi-day drift scans against a 408 MHz sky model, detection of a solar type III burst cross-checked with e-CALLISTO, and pulsar detections (two folded profiles shown, three additional detections deferred to a companion paper). The paper also gives sensitivity projections for the current single tile and future upgrades.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper demonstrates a low-cost, largely in-house-built aperture array capable of detecting bright pulsars and solar transients, with potential educational and training value. The empirical validations are meaningful: the ORBCOMM and Sun transits provide external beam checks, the solar flare is corroborated by an independent spectrograph, and the pulsar detections are benchmarked against catalogue parameters. The open data and code availability are also strengths. However, the central quantitative sensitivity claim in Section 6 is incorrect by an order of magnitude, and the full-tile beam/SEFD used for projections rests on unvalidated CST simulations.

major comments (3)
  1. [§6, sensitivity estimate] The statement that with SEFD=25 kJy, 16 MHz bandwidth, and 1-hour integration the system will detect sources with flux density 50 mJy is inconsistent with the radiometer equation. For a point source, S_min = SEFD × SNR / sqrt(B·t). With SEFD = 25,000 Jy, B = 16 MHz, t = 3600 s: for SNR=5, S_min ≈ 0.52 Jy; for SNR=10, ≈ 1.04 Jy. The 50 mJy figure is a factor 10–20 too low. The paper's own measured subgroup sensitivity in §5.2 (≈250 Jy for 0.5 s, 2 MHz, scaled to the full array) gives a similar ~1 Jy threshold, confirming the discrepancy. This is not a typo in one phrase: the same 50 mJy threshold is used for Figure 11 and for the '10 times weaker sources' claim in §7.
  2. [§6 and Figure 11] Figure 11 claims 65 pulsars detectable at SNR=10 in one hour based on the 50 mJy threshold. With the corrected threshold of approximately 1 Jy (or 0.5 Jy at SNR=5), the number of detectable pulsars will be far smaller, and the projected 114 pulsars with two tiles is likewise unsupported. The pulsar census and upgrade projections must be recomputed using a consistent radiometer calculation, or the sensitivity claim explicitly revised.
  3. [§5.1 and §6] The experimentally verified beam patterns in §5.1 (ORBCOMM and Sun) are for an 8-LPDA subgroup, not the full 64-LPDA tile. The full-array gain (22 dBi), SEFD (25 kJy), and side-lobe suppression are taken from CST simulations that include mutual coupling and ground-plane effects that have not been directly validated. Since the Section 6 detection projections depend critically on these simulated values, the paper should clearly label the full-tile performance as simulation-based and provide an uncertainty estimate. A direct measurement of the full-array beam (e.g., using ORBCOMM transits or a strong source scan) would substantially strengthen the sensitivity projections.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§5.4 / Figure 10] Only two of the five claimed pulsar detections are presented; the other three are deferred to a companion paper in preparation. This is acceptable for an instrument paper, but the abstract and summary should either present profiles for all five in an appendix or explicitly state that the five-detection claim is supported by data in a companion paper.
  2. [§5.2] The drift-curve normalisation to the predicted Galactic-plane peak of the same sky model used for comparison introduces a mild circularity. The match shown in Figure 8 would be more convincing if an absolute calibration or an independent reference were used. Also, the free per-day normalisation should be stated explicitly.
  3. [General / typos] Several presentation issues need correction: 'system equivalent flex density' should be 'flux density'; 'probogation' in the Introduction; the citation block at the bottom of the first page contains template placeholder text ('Author1 C and Author2 C, an open-source python tool...'); the header date 'Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia (2021)' is inconsistent with the arXiv date.
  4. [§6] The radiometer equation is never written explicitly. Adding it, together with the definition of SNR and any assumed pulsar duty cycle or detection threshold, would remove ambiguity about the 50 mJy figure.
  5. [Figure 11] The three sky patches (zenith beam, 8-dipole groups, element-level) are not labeled in the figure itself; the legend appears only in the caption. Adding labels to the figure would improve readability.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Mostly self-contained: central detections are externally benchmarked. One minor normalization-dependent comparison in §5.2 and several non-load-bearing self-citations do not make the core claims circular.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 5.2, Figure 8 text and caption]
    "The different days measurements were normalised to the galactic plane’s peak power at 18:30 hours and overlaid in various colours. The estimate matches the power observed by the array, with minor deviations."

    The predicted curve is the 408-MHz sky map convolved with the subgroup beam. The measured drift curves are then scaled to the Galactic-plane peak at 18:30, which is the peak of that same predicted curve. This forces agreement in absolute level at one time; the comparison can validate only the shape of the drift curve, not the absolute sky-temperature or gain calibration. This is a mild, peripheral calibration-dependent consistency check, not part of the pulsar or solar detection claims.

full rationale

The core empirical claims of GBD-DART-I—successful detection of pulsars and solar flares—are benchmarked against external, independent data: standard pulsar ephemerides/profiles, catalogue parameters, and the e-CALLISTO solar spectrograph at Udaipur. The array sensitivity used for future projections is estimated from observations of standard sources (Virgo-A, Cygnus-A, Taurus-A) and then scaled via the radiometer equation; that is calibration plus extrapolation, not a fit to the quantity being predicted. The many self-citations (Arul Pandian 2025; Arul PB et al. 2026; Likhit et al. 2025) describe prior development, RFI studies, and an in-preparation pipeline paper, but the present paper includes its own field measurements and simulations where those claims matter. The diamond-array configuration is attributed to general antenna references rather than to an unverified self-citation chain. The only mildly circular passage is the drift-curve comparison in Section 5.2, where the data are normalized to the Galactic-plane peak of the same sky-model prediction being compared, so the match is partly by construction. That step is peripheral to the central results. Separately, the Section 6 '50 mJy in one hour' projection appears inconsistent with the stated SEFD of 25 kJy by roughly an order of magnitude, but that is an internal arithmetic/interpretation issue—a correctness risk, not circular reasoning—so it does not raise the circularity score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated; the central claims rest on the fidelity of CST simulations, the 408-MHz sky model at 200 MHz, catalogue pulsar ephemerides, and the assumed RFI/filter environment. The main free parameter is the drift-data normalization, plus design choices in the antenna layout.

free parameters (2)
  • Drift-curve normalization scale per day = scaled to Galactic-plane peak at 18:30 h (numerical value not stated)
    In §5.2 the observed drift power is normalized to the peak predicted by the sky model before comparison, making the model-data agreement at that point automatic.
  • LPDA pair tilt angle = 23° from zenith
    §3 describes the 23° inclination chosen to flatten gain and suppress sidelobes; it is an ad hoc design value tuned in CST simulations, not derived from first principles.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption CST full-wave simulations accurately predict the far-field beam patterns and S11 of the LPDA and the full 64-element tile.
    §3 uses CST simulations (Figures 2, 3, 5) as primary evidence for gain, sidelobe suppression, and beam shape; only the 8-LPDA subgroup response is checked against ORBCOMM and Sun transits (§5.1), not the full tile.
  • domain assumption The 408 MHz all-sky map can be used to predict the array's 200 MHz drift response without accounting for spectral index variations.
    §5.2 convolves the 408 MHz map with the sub-array beam to estimate expected 200 MHz power; no spectral index model is stated.
  • domain assumption Known pulsar ephemerides (period, DM) used for folding are accurate.
    §5.4 folds with DSPSR/PSRCHIVE; detections rely on catalogue values to phase-align profiles.
  • domain assumption The RFI environment and filter chain (130 MHz high-pass, 350 MHz low-pass) leave the 175/200 MHz bands clean enough for detections.
    §2 reports strong RFI below 129 MHz and moderate RFI at 250–270 MHz; the array's usable bands are inferred from these site surveys.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 12568 in / 18666 out tokens · 200668 ms · 2026-08-03T05:55:46.596844+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Gauribidanur Diamond Array Radio Telescope (GBD-DART) is a new small LPDA antenna array consisting of 64 short dipoles and associated receivers that has been custom developed and deployed at the Gauribidanur observatory (13.604 N, 77.427 E) to study bright Pulsars and Solar transients in the frequency range of 130-350 MHz. The LPDAs are arranged in a checkerboard layout, with opposite pairs combined to enable dual-polarised operation. A diamond-shaped (tilted square) array configuration was chosen to achieve high sidelobe suppression in the East-West and North-South directions. The tile measures 5.9 meters by 5.9 meters, with diagonals along both the North-South and East-West directions, each measuring about 8.4 meters. The LPDA array with one diamond-shaped tile has been fully commissioned and is operating in transit-observing mode, successfully detecting strong pulsars and solar flares over the last seven months. The present digital backend restricts the instantaneous bandwidth for observations to 16 MHz. The array operations are streamlined to facilitate remote operations. Apart from investigating Pulsar and Solar phenomena at low radio frequencies in selected sources, this work aims to provide a training platform for radio astronomy through simple-to-construct, low-cost radio telescopes. In this paper, we present details of the array, including antenna and array response studies, brief descriptions of front-end and backend instrumentation, and illustrative results from observations of both pulsars and solar flares. It will also provide brief details of future upgrade plans, particularly for the tiles and digital backend, to facilitate the observation of additional sources.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.00677 by Arasi Sathyamurthy, Arul Pandian B, Joydeep Bagchi, Kasturi S, K.B.Raghavendra Rao, Prabu Thiagaraj, R Abhishek, Sahana Bhattramakki, Sandhya, Shiv Sethi, Vinutha Chandrashekar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Typical (a) spectrum and (b) spectrogram observed in the RFI measure￾ments at the Gauribidanur observatory from 2022. We studied the site’s RFI conditions over several days, using a custom-built receiver chain and a commercial spectrum anal￾yser (Arul Pandian B 2025). An illustration of a typical spectrum obtained with the most numerous interferences is shown in Figures 1a and 1b. Strong RFI was observed b… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Single LPDA Antenna. The second boom with complement dipoles is joined along the side to form the 11-element LPDA. The responses obtained at 150, 200, 250, 300 and 350 MHz are overlaid for E-plane in (b) and H-plane in (c). (d) Pyramid antenna element (e) Pyramid antenna element E-plane gain (f) Pyramid antenna element H-plane gain . The simulations carried out using the CST® software package . 0 100 2… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Simulated S11 (blue dashed line) of the LPDA from CST software is compared with measured S11 (solid red line) by N9916B microwave analyser. 4.2. Signal Conditioning and Transport As outlined in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Far-field orthographic responses of the diamond array with only single, two, eight and 32 LPDAs at 150, 250 and 350 MHz sequence: a first stage amplifier, a high-pass filter allowing sig￾nals above 130 MHz, a second amplifier, a Low-pass filter to stop signals above 350 MHz, and a third amplifier. The TubRx has a noise figure of 1.2 dB and a gain of 52 dB across the 220 MHz-wide band from 130 to 350 MHz. T… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Array signal chain consists of 64 LPDAs in a dual polarised configuration with LNAs, voltage combiner network, high gain amplifiers with 130 to 350 MHz band-pass filters, RF to optical converters, 300 m long 1310 nm single mode optical fibers, optical to RF converters, amplifiers, 16 MHz portable analog/digital receiver, and data recording/processing/archival computers [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p0… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The array’s sub-group beam response study using a sub-group of eight LPDAs. (a) Transit observation of ORBCOMM satellite pass at 137 MHz. (b) Transit observation of the Sun at 200 MHz. See also figure 8 for a multiple day transit observation. yellow dots (P1 and P2) in figure, drifts to the right during the observed epochs between 22 March 2025 and 14 April 2025. We have also investigated the array’s respo… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The upper plot shows an overlay of results from six days’ drift mode observation by the array subgroup Figure 5c. High intensities correspond to the Galactic plane, which is visible at RA 18:30, and is obscured by the Sun between 23:00 and 02:00 Hours. The plots correspond to observations made over three weeks. The lower subplot shows the radio sky visible to the array’s subgroup in the (Remazeilles M. et … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Pulsars detected at 175 MHz with 1800 seconds integration. (a) J0534+2200 (MJD 60945) (b) J1136+1551 (MJD 60939) as DSPSR (van Straten. W. & Bailes. M. 2011) and PSRCHIVE (Hotan A. W. et al. 2004). The continuous raw ADC data was recorded with the PDR system ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: An intense solar event recorded on 27 July 2024. with an SNR of 7, using only 16 LPDAs across two X-polarisation subgroups. Subsequently, we have brought up the whole array with 64 LPDAs as outlined in the paper with dual (X and Y) polarisa￾tion and successfully detected four other bright pulsars that transit across the array’s nominal half-power beam between declination of +6◦ and +22◦ ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Illustration of beam positions across the band with phasing. A time￾delay-based beam-forming method enables wider tracking and pointing. each pointing set [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The sky visible to a GBD-DART tile, and detectable pulsars. The hatched region depicts the HPBW of the primary X- and Y-polarisation LPDAs. A narrower inner shaded sky area is visible for the 16 LPDA subgroup beams. The ’+’ symbols on the map indicate the locations of the 65 pulsars detectable with a reasonable SNR (10) in an hour of observation in a 16 MHz band around 200 MHz. The ’O symbols indicate the… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ‘Toward epoch of reionization measurements with wide-field radio observations’

    Morales, Miguel F and Hewitt, Jacqueline., (2004). ‘Toward epoch of reionization measurements with wide-field radio observations’. The Astrophysical Journal\/ , 615, pp. 7

    2004

  2. [2]

    ‘The epoch of reionization’

    Benson, Andrew J and Sugiyama, Naoshi and Nusser, Adi and Lacey, Cedric G, 2006. ‘The epoch of reionization’. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society\/ , 369, PP. 1055--1080

    2006

  3. [3]

    ‘A measurement of excess antenna temperature at 4080 Mc/s.’ Astrophysical Journal\/ , 142, pp

    Penzias, Arno A and Wilson, Robert Woodrow., 1965. ‘A measurement of excess antenna temperature at 4080 Mc/s.’ Astrophysical Journal\/ , 142, pp. 419--421

    1965

  4. [4]

    ‘Rotation curve of the Milky Way and the dark matter density’

    Sofue, Yoshiaki, 2020. ‘Rotation curve of the Milky Way and the dark matter density’. Galaxies\/ , 8, pp.37

    2020

  5. [5]

    ‘The gauribidanur radioheliograph’ Solar Physics\/ , 181, pp.439--453

    Ramesh, R and Subramanian, KR and Sundararajan, MS and Sastry, Ch V, 1998. ‘The gauribidanur radioheliograph’ Solar Physics\/ , 181, pp.439--453

    1998

  6. [6]

    ‘Observation of a rapidly pulsating radio source (reprinted from Nature, February 24, 1968)’

    Hewish, A and Bell, SJ and Pilkington, JDH and Scott, PF and Collins, RA., (1969). ‘Observation of a rapidly pulsating radio source (reprinted from Nature, February 24, 1968)’. Nature\/ , 224, p.472

    1969

  7. [7]

    ‘Fast radio bursts’ The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review\/ , 27, 4

    Petroff, Emily and Hessels, JWT and Lorimer, DR,, 2019. ‘Fast radio bursts’ The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review\/ , 27, 4

    2019

  8. [8]

    ‘Frequency-dependent dispersion measures and implications for pulsar timing’ The Astrophysical Journal\/ , 817, p.16

    Cordes, James M and Shannon, Ryan M and Stinebring, Daniel R, 2016. ‘Frequency-dependent dispersion measures and implications for pulsar timing’ The Astrophysical Journal\/ , 817, p.16

    2016

  9. [9]

    ‘Pulsar rotation measures and the galactic magnetic field’ Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society\/ , 237, pp.533--541

    Lyne, AG and Smith, F Graham, 1989. ‘Pulsar rotation measures and the galactic magnetic field’ Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society\/ , 237, pp.533--541

    1989

  10. [10]

    (2021) ‘Evidence for profile changes in PSR J1713+ 0747 using the uGMRT’

    Singha, Jaikhomba and Surnis, Mayuresh P and Joshi, Bhal Chandra and Tarafdar, Pratik and Rana, Prerna and Susobhanan, Abhimanyu and Girgaonkar, Raghav and Kolhe, Neel and Agarwal, Nikita and Desai, Shantanu and others. (2021) ‘Evidence for profile changes in PSR J1713+ 0747 using the uGMRT’. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters\/ , ...

    2021

  11. [11]

    ‘Pulsar timing and general relativity’ Annual review of astronomy and astrophysics.\/ , 24, pp

    Backer, DC and Hellings, RW., 1986. ‘Pulsar timing and general relativity’ Annual review of astronomy and astrophysics.\/ , 24, pp. 537--575

    1986

  12. [12]

    ‘The indian pulsar timing array: First data release’

    Tarafdar, Pratik and Nobleson, K and Rana, Prerna and Singha, Jaikhomba and Krishnakumar, MA and Joshi, Bhal Chandra and Paladi, Avinash Kumar and Kolhe, Neel and Batra, Neelam Dhanda and Agarwal, Nikita and others, 2022. ‘The indian pulsar timing array: First data release’. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia\/ , 39, e053

    2022

  13. [13]

    ‘Noise analysis of the Indian Pulsar Timing Array data release I’

    Srivastava, Aman and Desai, Shantanu and Kolhe, Neel and Surnis, Mayuresh and Joshi, Bhal Chandra and Susobhanan, Abhimanyu and Chalumeau, Aur \'e lien and Hisano, Shinnosuke and K, Nobleson and Arumugam, Swetha and others, 2023. ‘Noise analysis of the Indian Pulsar Timing Array data release I’. Physical Review D\/ , 108), p.023008

    2023

  14. [14]

    (2018) ‘Observations of low-frequency radio emission from millisecond pulsars and multipath propagation in the interstellar medium’

    Bhat, NDR and Tremblay, SE and Kirsten, Franz and Meyers, BW and Sokolowski, Marcin and Van Straten, W and McSweeney, SJ and Ord, SM and Shannon, RM and Beardsley, A and others. (2018) ‘Observations of low-frequency radio emission from millisecond pulsars and multipath propagation in the interstellar medium’. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series\/ ...

    2018

  15. [15]

    ‘LOFAR: The low-frequency array’

    van Haarlem, Michael P and Wise, Michael W and Gunst, AW and Heald, George and McKean, John P and Hessels, Jason WT and de Bruyn, A Ger and Nijboer, Ronald and Swinbank, John and Fallows, Richard and others., (2013). ‘LOFAR: The low-frequency array’. Astronomy & astrophysics\/ , 556, pp. A2

    2013

  16. [16]

    ‘The long wavelength array’

    Ellingson, Steven W and Clarke, Tracy E and Cohen, Aaron and Craig, Joseph and Kassim, Namir E and Pihlstrom, Ylva and Rickard, Lee J and Taylor, Gregory B., 2009. ‘The long wavelength array’. Proceedings of the IEEE\/ , 97, PP. 1421--1430

    2009

  17. [17]

    ‘The Murchison widefield array: the square kilometre array precursor at low radio frequencies’

    Tingay, Steven John and Goeke, Robert and Bowman, Judd D and Emrich, David and Ord, Stephen M and Mitchell, Daniel A and Morales, Miguel F and Booler, Tom and Crosse, Brian and Wayth, Randall B and others., 2013. ‘The Murchison widefield array: the square kilometre array precursor at low radio frequencies’. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Aust...

    2013

  18. [18]

    ‘The CHIME fast radio burst project: system overview’

    Amiri, M and Bandura, K and Berger, P and Bhardwaj, M and Boyce, MM and Boyle, PJ and Brar, C and Burhanpurkar, M and Chawla, P and Chowdhury, J and others., (2018). ‘The CHIME fast radio burst project: system overview’. The Astrophysical Journal\/ , 863, p.48

    2018

  19. [19]

    ‘Hydrogen epoch of reionization array (HERA)’ Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific\/ , 129, pp.045001

    DeBoer, David R and Parsons, Aaron R and Aguirre, James E and Alexander, Paul and Ali, Zaki S and Beardsley, Adam P and Bernardi, Gianni and Bowman, Judd D and Bradley, Richard F and Carilli, Chris L and others., 2017. ‘Hydrogen epoch of reionization array (HERA)’ Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific\/ , 129, pp.045001

    2017

  20. [20]

    ‘The square kilometre array’ Proceedings of the IEEE\/ , 97, pp

    Dewdney, Peter E and Hall, Peter J and Schilizzi, Richard T and Lazio, T Joseph LW., 2016. ‘The square kilometre array’ Proceedings of the IEEE\/ , 97, pp. 1482--1496

    2016

  21. [21]

    ‘The Gauribidanur radio observatory’ National Institute of Science Communication and Information Resources\/

    Sastry, Ch V, 1989. ‘The Gauribidanur radio observatory’ National Institute of Science Communication and Information Resources\/

    1989

  22. [22]

    A., and V

    Deshpande, A. A., and V. Radhakrishnan., 1992. ‘Pulsar observations at 34.5 MHz using the Gauribidanur Telescope: I.’ Journal of astrophysics and astronomy\/ , 13.2, pp. 151-165

    1992

  23. [23]

    ‘Discovery of low DM fast radio transients: Geminga pulsar caught in the act.’ The Astrophysical Journal\/ , 815(2), p.126

    Maan, Y., 2015. ‘Discovery of low DM fast radio transients: Geminga pulsar caught in the act.’ The Astrophysical Journal\/ , 815(2), p.126

    2015

  24. [24]

    Barve, G

    Bane, Kshitij S., Indrajit V. Barve, G. V. S. Gireesh, C. Kathiravan, and R. Ramesh., 2022. ‘Prototype for pulsar observations at low radio frequencies using log-periodic dipole antennas.’ Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems\/ , 8, 1

    2022

  25. [25]

    ‘Log periodic dipole arrays’ IRE transactions on antennas and propagation\/ , 8, p.260--267

    Isbell, D, 2003. ‘Log periodic dipole arrays’ IRE transactions on antennas and propagation\/ , 8, p.260--267

    2003

  26. [26]

    B., Vinutha, C., Abhishek, R., Prabu, T., and Bagchi, J., 2022

    Arul Pandian, B., Raghavendra Rao, K. B., Vinutha, C., Abhishek, R., Prabu, T., and Bagchi, J., 2022. ‘A Novel LPDA Array for 130-350 MHz Pulsar observation at Gauribidanur-Initial Results.’ In 43rd meeting of the Astronomical Society of India\/ ,p, 49

    2022

  27. [27]

    ‘Intrinsic instrumental polarization and high-precision pulsar timing’ Oxford University Press\/ , 453, p.1489--1502

    Foster, Griffin and Karastergiou, Aris and Paulin, Remi and Carozzi, TD and Johnston, Simon and van Straten, Willem, 2015. ‘Intrinsic instrumental polarization and high-precision pulsar timing’ Oxford University Press\/ , 453, p.1489--1502

    2015

  28. [28]

    Zenodo,\/ doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15709357, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15709357

    Arul Pandian B (2025) ‘Arul16psp05/supplementary\_materials: Gauribidanur Diamond Array’. Zenodo,\/ doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15709357, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15709357

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.15709357 2025

  29. [29]

    and Fleisch, D.A., 1999, ‘Electromagnetics: With Applications'

    Kraus, J.D. and Fleisch, D.A., 1999, ‘Electromagnetics: With Applications'. WCB/McGraw-Hill\/ , isbn: 9780071164290

    1999

  30. [30]

    (1967), ‘Radio Astronomy’

    Kraus, John D and Moffet, Alan T. (1967), ‘Radio Astronomy’. American Journal of Physics\/ , 35, pp. 450--450

    1967

  31. [31]

    (2013) ‘RRI-GBT multi-band receiver: motivation, design, and development’

    Maan, Yogesh and Deshpande, Avinash A and Chandrashekar, Vinutha and Chennamangalam, Jayanth and Rao, KB Raghavendra and Somashekar, R and Anderson, Gary and Ezhilarasi, MS and Sujatha, S and Kasturi, S and others. (2013) ‘RRI-GBT multi-band receiver: motivation, design, and development’. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series\/ , 204, pp. 12

    2013

  32. [32]

    ‘A 50 MHz system for GMRT’

    Shankar, N Udaya and Dwarakanath, KS and Amiri, Shahram and Somashekar, R and Girish, BS and Laus, Wences and Nayak, Arvind, 2009. ‘A 50 MHz system for GMRT’. arxiv.org\/ , arXiv preprint arXiv:0905.1461

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  33. [33]

    ‘SKALA, a log-periodic array antenna for the SKA-low instrument: design, simulations, tests and system considerations’

    de Lera Acedo, E and Razavi-Ghods, N and Troop, N and Drought, N and Faulkner, AJ, 2015. ‘SKALA, a log-periodic array antenna for the SKA-low instrument: design, simulations, tests and system considerations’. Experimental Astronomy\/ , 39), pp. 567--594

    2015

  34. [34]

    (2014) ‘On the simulation and validation of the Intrinsic Cross-Polarization Ratio for antenna arrays devoted to low frequency radio astronomy’

    Fiorelli, B and Acedo, E De Lera. (2014) ‘On the simulation and validation of the Intrinsic Cross-Polarization Ratio for antenna arrays devoted to low frequency radio astronomy’. IEEE\/ , pp. 2361--2364

    2014

  35. [35]

    ‘A grid array antenna composed of diamond-shaped cells’ IEEE\/ , pp.1--3

    Kawano, Toru and Nakano, Hisamatsu, 2016. ‘A grid array antenna composed of diamond-shaped cells’ IEEE\/ , pp.1--3

    2016

  36. [36]

    ‘A diamond-shaped grid array antenna printed on a dielectric substrate’

    Kawano, Toru and Nakano, Hisamatsu, 2017. ‘A diamond-shaped grid array antenna printed on a dielectric substrate’. IEEE\/ pp.105--107

    2017

  37. [37]

    system description'

    Hotan, AW and Bunton, JD and Chippendale, AP and Whiting, M and Tuthill, John and Moss, Vanessa A and McConnell, D and Amy, SW and Huynh, MT and Allison, JR and others, 2021, ‘Australian square kilometre array pathfinder: I. system description'. Cambridge University Press\/ , 38, p. e009

    2021

  38. [38]

    (2025), ‘Innovative Web Tool for Remote Data Acquisition and Analysis: Customized for SKA Low frequency Beamforming Test Bed LPDA Array at Gauribidanur Radio Observatory’

    Likhit, Anumanchi Agastya Sai Ram and Naveen, Katta and Pandian, B Arul and Abhishek, R and Prabu, Thiagaraj. (2025), ‘Innovative Web Tool for Remote Data Acquisition and Analysis: Customized for SKA Low frequency Beamforming Test Bed LPDA Array at Gauribidanur Radio Observatory’. Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy\/ , 46

    2025

  39. [39]

    (2008) ‘Lossless Gigabit Remote Packet Capture With Linux’

    Corey Satten. (2008) ‘Lossless Gigabit Remote Packet Capture With Linux’. https://staff.washington.edu/corey/gulp/

    2008

  40. [40]

    (1989) ‘Measurement distance requirements for both symmetrical and antisymmetrical aperture antennas’

    Corona, Paolo and Ferrara, Giuseppe and Gennarelli, Claudio. (1989) ‘Measurement distance requirements for both symmetrical and antisymmetrical aperture antennas’. IEEE\/ , pp. 990--995

    1989

  41. [41]

    ‘A far-field measurement method for large size antenna by using synthetic aperture antenna’ IEEE\/ , pp

    Yamaguchi, Ryo and Kimura, Yasuko and Komiya, Kazuhiro and Cho, Keizo, 2009. ‘A far-field measurement method for large size antenna by using synthetic aperture antenna’ IEEE\/ , pp. 1730--1733

    2009

  42. [42]

    ‘In situ measurement of MWA primary beam variation using ORBCOMM’ Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia\/ , 35, pp

    Line, JLB and McKinley, B and Rasti, J and Bhardwaj, M and Wayth, RB and Webster, RL and Ung, D and Emrich, David and Horsley, L and Beardsley, A and others, 2009. ‘In situ measurement of MWA primary beam variation using ORBCOMM’ Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia\/ , 35, pp. e045

    2009

  43. [43]

    ‘Measuring phased-array antenna beampatterns with high dynamic range for the Murchison Widefield Array using 137 MHz ORBCOMM satellites’

    Neben, AR and Bradley, RF and Hewitt, Jacqueline N and Bernardi, GIANNI and Bowman, JD and Briggs, Franklin and Cappallo, RJ and Deshpande, AA and Goeke, R and Greenhill, LJ and others, 2015. ‘Measuring phased-array antenna beampatterns with high dynamic range for the Murchison Widefield Array using 137 MHz ORBCOMM satellites’. AGU\/ , 50, pp.614--629

    2015

  44. [44]

    IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine\/ , 39, pp

    Law, DC and Khorrami, JR and Sessions, WB and Shanahan, MK, 1997, ‘Radiation patterns of a large UHF phased-array antenna: A comparison of measurements using satellite repeaters and patterns derived from measurements of antenna current distributions'. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine\/ , 39, pp. 88--93

    1997

  45. [45]

    (2020), ‘Array programming with NumPy’

    Harris, Charles R and Millman, K Jarrod and Van Der Walt, St \'e fan J and Gommers, Ralf and Virtanen, Pauli and Cournapeau, David and Wieser, Eric and Taylor, Julian and Berg, Sebastian and Smith, Nathaniel J and others. (2020), ‘Array programming with NumPy’. Nature\/ , 585, pp. 357--362

    2020

  46. [46]

    ‘An accurate flux density scale from 50 MHz to 50 GHz’ The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series\/ , 230, pp

    Perley, Richard A and Butler, Bryan J, 2017. ‘An accurate flux density scale from 50 MHz to 50 GHz’ The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series\/ , 230, pp. 7

    2017

  47. [47]

    ‘An improved source-subtracted and destriped 408-MHz all-sky map’

    Remazeilles, M and Dickinson, C and Banday, AJ and Bigot-Sazy, M-A and Ghosh, T, 2015. ‘An improved source-subtracted and destriped 408-MHz all-sky map’. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society\/ , 451, pp.4311--4327

    2015

  48. [48]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics\/ , 558, pp

    Robitaille, Thomas P and Tollerud, Erik J and Greenfield, Perry and Droettboom, Michael and Bray, Erik and Aldcroft, Tom and Davis, Matt and Ginsburg, Adam and Price-Whelan, Adrian M and Kerzendorf, Wolfgang E and others, 2013, ‘Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy'. Astronomy & Astrophysics\/ , 558, pp. A33

    2013

  49. [49]

    (2019), ‘Solar radio observation using CALLISTO at the USO/PRL, Udaipur’

    Upadhyay, Kushagra and Joshi, Bhuwan and Mitra, Prabir K and Bhattacharyya, Ramit and Oberoi, Divya and Monstein, Christian. (2019), ‘Solar radio observation using CALLISTO at the USO/PRL, Udaipur’. IEEE\/ , pp. 1--6

    2019

  50. [50]

    Arul Pandian B, Joydeep Bagchi, Prabu T, K.B.Raghavendra Rao, Vinutha Chandrashekar., & Hobbs, M. (2025). GBD-DART - II: Gauribidanur Diamond Array Radio Telescope: Pulsar Signal Processing Pipeline, with Initial Results Observing Five Bright Pulsars (In Preparation,2026)

    2025

  51. [51]

    D., 2007

    Hunter, J. D., 2007. ‘Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment’ Computing in Science & Engineering\/ , 9, pp. 90--95

    2007

  52. [52]

    van Straten, W., & Bailes, M. (2011). DSPSR: digital signal processing software for pulsar astronomy. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 28(1), 1-14

    2011

  53. [53]

    W., van Straten, W., & Manchester, R

    Hotan, A. W., van Straten, W., & Manchester, R. N. (2004). PSRCHIVE and PSRFITS: an open approach to radio pulsar data storage and analysis. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 21(3), 302-309

    2004

  54. [54]

    ‘Handbook of pulsar astronomy’

    Lorimer, Duncan Ross and Kramer, Michael, 2015. ‘Handbook of pulsar astronomy’. Cambridge university press\/ , 4, pp.4311--4327

    2015

  55. [55]

    Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy\/ , 44, pp

    Girish, BS and Reddy, S Harshavardhan and Sethi, Shiv and Srivani, KS and Abhishek, R and Ajithkumar, B and Bhattramakki, Sahana and Buch, Kaushal and Chaudhuri, Sandeep and Gupta, Yashwant and others, 2023, ‘Progression of digital-receiver architecture: From MWA to SKA1-Low, and beyond'. Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy\/ , 44, pp. 28

    2023

  56. [56]

    (2021), ‘Grammarly as AI-powered English writing assistant: Students’ alternative for writing English’

    Fitria, Tira Nur. (2021), ‘Grammarly as AI-powered English writing assistant: Students’ alternative for writing English’. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching\/ , 5, pp. 65--78

    2021

  57. [57]

    (2021), ‘QuillBot as an online tool: Students’ alternative in paraphrasing and rewriting of English writing’

    Fitria, Tira Nur. (2021), ‘QuillBot as an online tool: Students’ alternative in paraphrasing and rewriting of English writing’. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities\/ , 9, pp. 183--196

    2021

  58. [58]

    RRI Astronomy Summer School (RASS) - 2025

    Adithya Poder, 2025. "RRI Astronomy Summer School (RASS) - 2025",. https://github.com/pi-r2-dev/RASS-2025.git

    2025

  59. [59]

    RRI Astronomy Summer School (RASS) - 2025

    Mahek Patel, 2025. "RRI Astronomy Summer School (RASS) - 2025",. https://github.com/Mahek566/RASS-Summer-School-Pulsar-Project.git

    2025