Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

For the black-bounce-Schwarzschild spacetime, the strong-field deflection of neutral massive particles of arbitrary speed follows a two-coefficient logarithmic law, from which all main lensing observables can be read off.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 04:41 UTC pith:ZCRDO7CC

load-bearing objection Solid analytic extension of strong-field lensing to massive particles in a black-bounce spacetime, with the usual Bozza truncation error left unquantified at low velocities. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2602.04218 v2 pith:ZCRDO7CC submitted 2026-02-04 gr-qc

Strong field gravitational lensing of particles by a black-bounce-Schwarzschild black hole

Guansheng He , Jiaxu Huang , Zhongwen Feng , Ghulam Mustafa , Wenbin Lin This is my paper
classification gr-qc PACS 04.70.-s95.30.Sf98.62.Sb
keywords gravitational lensingstrong deflection limitmassive particlesblack-bounce-Schwarzschild black holeparticle spherevelocity effectSgr A*timelike geodesics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper works out, in analytic form, how neutral massive particles of any speed w are strongly deflected by a black-bounce-Schwarzschild black hole — a regular spacetime that becomes Schwarzschild when the bounce parameter eta vanishes. Its central output is a closed-form deflection angle, a logarithmic law in the distance of closest approach, with coefficients that depend only on w and eta; from it the paper derives the main strong-field lensing observables: the angular radius of the particle sphere, the separation between the outermost image and the packed inner images, and their flux ratio. The particle sphere equation is shown to reduce to the photon sphere equation at w=1, giving a built-in consistency check. The paper also defines velocity effects — differences between particle speeds and light speed — and evaluates their detectability using Sgr A* as the lens. If correct, the results give a complete strong-lensing model for timelike messengers in this spacetime and a clear route to similar models for other static symmetric spacetimes.

Core claim

The paper claims that the strong-field bending angle of a massive particle in the black-bounce-Schwarzschild geometry is, to leading order, alpha(r0,w) = -a ln(r0/rc - 1) + b + O((r0-rc) ln(r0-rc)), where rc is the particle-sphere radius and the coefficients a and b are explicit functions of the speed w and the bounce parameter eta (Eqs. 28-32). This immediately yields the critical impact parameter uc, and hence the observable angular radius theta_infinity = uc/dL, the image separation s, and the flux-ratio magnitude difference Rm (Eqs. 43-45). The velocity effects — the change in these observables when a particle's speed differs from light speed — are shown to grow monotonically as w drops,

What carries the argument

The machinery is the strong-field expansion of the exact geodesic deflection integral. The method splits the integral into a divergent logarithmic part and a regular remainder, evaluated at the particle-sphere radius; the particle sphere — the unstable timelike circular orbit — is the location where this expansion starts. The key identity is the particle sphere equation, which reduces to the standard photon sphere equation at w=1, and the key output is the two-coefficient deflection law with a(w,eta) and b(w,eta), where b contains a numerically evaluated integral. These coefficients carry all metric information into the observables.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the leading-order logarithmic expansion, truncated after the constant term, is uniformly accurate across the entire speed range 0<w<1, including very slow particles where the coefficient a diverges and the neglected correction terms have not been quantified.

What would settle it

Compute the exact deflection integral (Eq. 13) numerically for a slow particle, say w=0.001 with eta/M=1, at a closest-approach radius close to rc, and compare with the one-log formula (Eq. 33). If the difference is comparable to the predicted image separation s or the velocity shift Delta s at that speed, the truncation fails. Alternatively, evaluate the j>=1 terms in the regular-part expansion (Eq. 30) and check their magnitude relative to b_R.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For any given particle speed and bounce parameter, the strong-lensing observables (angular particle-sphere radius, image separation, flux ratio) are now explicit functions, so one can compute them without solving geodesic equations case by case.
  • Because the particle sphere equation reproduces the photon sphere at w=1, all results contain a built-in check: setting w=1 recovers the known photon-sphere strong-field lensing observables.
  • Velocity effects on the image separation and particle-sphere radius increase monotonically with decreasing speed, so slower massive particles should produce more separated, brighter outermost images than photons — a testable difference in multimessenger lensing.
  • For Sgr A*, the estimated velocity effect on the particle-sphere radius can exceed 1 microarcsecond for particles with w near 0.92, implying detectability with astrometry at the planned radio-array level.
  • The bounce parameter eta modulates the separation and flux ratio modestly but monotonically, giving a way to constrain eta from image separation measurements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper stops at leading order; an immediate extension is to compute the next-order term O((r0-rc) ln(r0-rc)) analytically or numerically and check whether it is small at very small w, since the leading coefficient a diverges as w→0 and truncation error is unquantified there.
  • The same particle-sphere-plus-expansion strategy should apply to a rotating black-bounce spacetime, where the particle sphere becomes a surface and image positions will depend on spin; the velocity effects might become spin-dependent asymmetries.
  • The detectability discussion compares against planned radio-array astrometry, but real massive-particle telescopes have much poorer angular resolution today; the practical route may be through the flux-ratio effect, which does not require high angular resolution, only high photometric precision.
  • If the truncation is valid, the strong growth of the particle-sphere angular radius at low w could in principle turn a single lensing event into a measurement of the particle's speed, since w enters the image geometry through the dimensionless coefficients.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies strong-field gravitational lensing of neutral massive particles by the black-bounce-Schwarzschild spacetime. It derives the particle sphere radius, uses the Bozza strong-field-limit method to obtain the deflection angle, computes the standard strong-deflection observables (angular radius of the particle sphere, image separation, and flux/magnitude ratio), defines velocity effects relative to the lightlike case, and applies the results to Sgr A* to estimate astronomical detectability. The derivation is analytic, with the coefficient b_R evaluated numerically.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides the first strong-deflection massive-particle lensing model in this regular spacetime and extends known Schwarzschild massive-particle results. The derivation has no free parameters, the particle-sphere condition correctly reduces to the photon-sphere equation as w→1, and the η=0 and w=1 limits reproduce known Schwarzschild and light-bending results, which are genuine strengths. The critical impact parameter is η-independent, and the observables θ∞ and R_m are unaffected by the truncation issue discussed below. The main risk is the uncontrolled truncation of the regular part of the deflection integral at the low velocities used for the most striking detectability claims.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. III C, Eq. (30); Sec. VI B, Fig. 3] Eq. (30) discards all j>0 terms in I_R, and the resulting Eq. (33) is used down to w=10^{-6} for quantitative detectability claims. The omitted remainder is never bounded. In the η=0, w→0 limit, Eqs. (28)–(32) give a=2√2, b_D=2√2 ln2, and b_R≈3.92, so for the first relativistic image α=2π the radial expansion parameter is ε≡r0/rc−1≈0.29. The O(ε ln ε) term in Eq. (33) is then about 10% of the leading term, and the j=1 term in Eq. (30) contributes an O(ε) shift to b_R. Since s∝exp[(b̄−2π)/ā] (Eq. (44)), an O(0.1–0.3) error in b̄ changes s by tens of percent. This propagates directly into Δs in Fig. 3(b) and the w≲0.23 detectability threshold. θ∞ and R_m depend only on u_c and ā and are not affected, but the s-based claims are not secured. Please compute the j=1 term (and ideally compare Eq. (13) with the exact numerical deflection) or restrict the domain/claims to the region where ε is
minor comments (4)
  1. [References] Refs. [53] and [74] are the same article (Zhou and Xie, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 1070 (2020)) and should be merged.
  2. [Sec. VI B] The reported ranges such as '9.1×10^{-8} to 8.9×10^5 μas' are hard to parse; a small table of representative values would improve readability.
  3. [Eq. (12)] The typeset square-root symbols appear as 'p' in the denominator; please fix the LaTeX rendering so the expression is unambiguous.
  4. [Fig. 2 and Fig. 3] The caption notes 'color-indexed' but it may help to state explicitly which color corresponds to which value of η̂, since the figures are central to the parameter-dependence discussion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the central strong-field lensing derivation is self-contained, with self-citations only in contextual framing.

full rationale

The paper's main derivation chain—metric (1)–(4) to geodesic equations (5)–(8), particle sphere (9)–(11), strong-field expansion (13)–(33), and observables (39)–(45)—is carried out explicitly within the paper. The coefficients a, b_D, b_R, and u_c are obtained by direct integration and algebra from the given metric and geodesic equations, not fitted to data. The numerical evaluation of b_R in Eq. (31) is a definite integral, not a fitted parameter. The 'velocity effects' in Eqs. (46)–(51) are defined as differences of already-derived quantities, so they are not circular. The paper checks known limits (Schwarzschild, photon-sphere, lightlike strong-field results), which provides independent validation. Some citations to the authors' own earlier works appear (e.g., [78], [84], [96], [97], [99], [101]), but they are used for context and motivation, not as load-bearing evidence for the central derivation. The approximation that retains only the j=0 term in Eq. (30) is an accuracy/truncation concern, not circularity: the paper's own Eq. (33) states the omitted order, and whether higher-order terms matter at low w is a quantitative convergence question, not a logical reduction of the result to its inputs. Overall, no step reduces by construction to its own inputs, and no prediction is a renamed fit.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No numbers are fitted in the derivation; eta and w are scanned model inputs rather than fitted parameters. The metric, geodesic hypothesis, strong-field expansion, and lens equation are imported from standard GR and prior literature. No new particles, forces, or additional entities are introduced.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The black-bounce-Schwarzschild metric (Eqs. 1-4) with A(r)=1-2M/sqrt(r^2+eta^2), C(r)=r^2+eta^2, and 0<eta<2M describes the lens geometry.
    The entire calculation is carried out in this spacetime; eta is an inherited model parameter from Simpson-Visser, not constrained by data in this paper.
  • standard math Massive test particles follow timelike geodesics with conserved E and L and Lagrangian L=1/2; unbound orbits with 0<w<1 are considered.
    Eqs. (5)-(8) use the standard geodesic equations and the definitions E=1/sqrt(1-w^2), L=w u E.
  • domain assumption The Bozza strong-field expansion assumes r0 approaches rc and keeps only the leading logarithmic divergence plus a constant term; higher-order terms in Eq. (30) are dropped.
    This is the standard strong-deflection-limit approximation, but its accuracy over the low-w part of the domain is not quantified.
  • domain assumption The Virbhadra-Ellis lens equation (38), with alpha=2n*pi+Delta_alpha_n, applies to massive-particle lensing with the observer and source in asymptotically flat regions.
    The paper extends the photon lens equation to timelike messengers; this is plausible but not re-derived.
  • domain assumption Sgr A* has M=4.2e6 solar masses and d_L=8.2 kpc, and can be modeled as a static black-bounce-Schwarzschild lens.
    Used in Sec. VI for numerical estimates; values are from cited astrophysical references.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 21668 in / 18391 out tokens · 196563 ms · 2026-08-03T04:41:26.274375+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The gravitational lensing of relativistic and nonrelativistic neutral massive particles in the black-bounce-Schwarzschild black hole spacetime is investigated in the strong deflection limit. Beginning with the explicit equations of motion of a massive particle in the regular spacetime, we achieve the equation of the particle sphere and thus the radius of the unstable timelike circular orbit. It is interesting to find that the particle sphere equation can reduce to the well-known photon sphere equation, when the particle's initial velocity is equal to the speed of light. We adopt the strong field limit approach to calculate the black-bounce-Schwarzschild deflection angle of the particle subsequently, and obtain the strong-deflection lensing observables of the relativistic images of a pointlike particle source. The observables mainly include the apparent angular particle sphere radius, the angular separation between the outermost relativistic image and the other ones which are packed together, and the ratio between the particle-flux magnification of the outermost image and that of the packed ones. The velocity effects induced by the deviation of the initial velocity of the particle from light speed on the corresponding strong-field lensing observables of the images of a pointlike light source in the regular geometry, along with these on the strong deflection limit coefficients and the critical impact parameter of the lightlike case, are then formulated. The influence of the spacetime bounce on the Schwarzschild lensing properties of the images of a massive-particle-emission source in the strong field limit is also considered. Serving as an application of the results, we finally concentrate on evaluating the astronomical detectability of the velocity- and bounce-induced effects on the lensing observables by modeling two typical supermassive black holes as the lens respectively.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.04218 by Ghulam Mustafa, Guansheng He, Jiaxu Huang, Wenbin Lin, Zhongwen Feng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Geometrical configuration of lensing of the massive parti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The critical impact parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The velocity effects [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Thin Accretion Disks around Rotating Charged Black Holes in an Effective Higher-Curvature Spacetime

    gr-qc 2026-05 conditional novelty 4.0

    An effective Gauss-Bonnet-like deformation of the Kerr-Newman metric moves the ISCO inward, raises radiative efficiency, flux, and temperature, while charge suppresses these quantities.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

209 extracted references · 144 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Refsdal, Mon

    S. Refsdal, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.128, 307 (1964)

    1964

  2. [2]

    R. D. Blandford and R. Narayan, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astro- phys.30, 311 (1992)

    1992

  3. [3]

    K. S. Virbhadra and G. F. R. Ellis, Phys. Rev. D62, 084003 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9904193 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  4. [4]

    Bartelmann and P

    M. Bartelmann and P. Schneider, Phys. Rep.340, 291 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/9912508 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  5. [5]

    C. R. Keeton and A. O. Petters, Phys. Rev. D72, 104006 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0511019 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  6. [6]

    Zhang, M

    P. Zhang, M. Liguori, R. Bean, and S. Dodelson, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 141302 (2007), arXiv:0704.1932 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  7. [7]

    Chen and J

    S. Chen and J. Jing, Phys. Rev. D80, 024036 (2009), arXiv:0905.2055 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  8. [8]

    Reyes, R

    R. Reyes, R. Mandelbaum, U. Seljak, T. Baldauf, J. E. Gunn, L. Lombriser, and R. E. Smith, Nature (London)464, 256 (2010), arXiv:1003.2185 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  9. [9]

    Narikawa, T

    T. Narikawa, T. Kobayashi, D. Yamauchi, and R. Saito, Phys. Rev. D87, 124006 (2013), arXiv:1302.2311 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  10. [10]

    Zhao and Y

    S.-S. Zhao and Y . Xie, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2016, 007 (2016), arXiv:1603.00637 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  11. [11]

    X.-L. Fan, K. Liao, M. Biesiada, A. Pi ´orkowska-Kurpas, and Z.-H. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 091102 (2017), arXiv:1612.04095 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  12. [12]

    H. Liu, X. Wang, H. Li, and Y . Ma, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 723 (2017), arXiv:1508.02647 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  13. [13]

    T. E. Collettet al., Science360, 1342 (2018), arXiv:1806.08300 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    S.-S. Li, S. Mao, Y . Zhao, and Y . Lu, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.476, 2220 (2018), arXiv:1802.05089 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    Jung and C

    S. Jung and C. S. Shin, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 041103 (2019), arXiv:1712.01396 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Z. Chen, W. Luo, Y .-F. Cai, and E. N. Saridakis, Phys. Rev. D 102, 104044 (2020), arXiv:1907.12225 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    Huang and X.-M

    G.-Y . Huang and X.-M. Deng, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1410 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    E. F. Eiroa and C. M. Sendra, Classical and Quantum Gravity 28, 085008 (2011), arXiv:1011.2455 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  19. [19]

    E. F. Eiroa and C. M. Sendra, Phys. Rev. D88, 103007 (2013), arXiv:1308.5959 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  20. [20]

    Schee and Z

    J. Schee and Z. Stuchl ´ık, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2015, 048 (2015), arXiv:1501.00835 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  21. [21]

    Ghaffarnejad and H

    H. Ghaffarnejad and H. niad, Int. J. Theor. Phys.55, 1492 (2016), arXiv:1411.7247 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  22. [22]

    Jusufi, A

    K. Jusufi, A. ¨Ovg¨un, J. Saavedra, Y . V ´asquez, and P. A. Gonz´alez, Phys. Rev. D97, 124024 (2018), arXiv:1804.00643 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  23. [23]

    Zhang and J

    R. Zhang and J. Jing, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 796 (2018)

    2018

  24. [24]

    Liu, Y .-F

    F.-Y . Liu, Y .-F. Mai, W.-Y . Wu, and Y . Xie, Phys. Lett. B795, 475 (2019)

    2019

  25. [25]

    ¨Ovg¨un, Phys

    A. ¨Ovg¨un, Phys. Rev. D99, 104075 (2019), arXiv:1902.04411 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    Cheng and Y

    X.-T. Cheng and Y . Xie, Phys. Rev. D103, 064040 (2021)

    2021

  27. [27]

    Ghosh and A

    S. Ghosh and A. Bhattacharyya, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2022, 006 (2022), arXiv:2206.09954 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    M. A. A. de Paula, H. C. D. L. Junior, P. V . P. Cunha, and L. C. B. Crispino, Phys. Rev. D108, 084029 (2023), arXiv:2305.04776 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Zhang, J

    R. Zhang, J. Jing, Z. Peng, and Q. Huang, Chin. Phys. C47, 105105 (2023), arXiv:2304.13263 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    C.-H. Xie, Y . Zhang, Q. Sun, Q.-Q. Li, and P.-F. Duan, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2024, 121 (2024), arXiv:2401.05454 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Turakhonov, F

    Z. Turakhonov, F. Atamurotov, S. G. Ghosh, and A. Abdujab- barov, Phys. Dark Univ.48, 101880 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Bambi, J

    C. Bambi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2013, 055 (2013), arXiv:1305.5409 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  33. [33]

    Li and C

    Z. Li and C. Bambi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2014, 041 (2014), arXiv:1309.1606 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  34. [34]

    F. Lamy, E. Gourgoulhon, T. Paumard, and F. H. Vin- cent, Classical and Quantum Gravity35, 115009 (2018), arXiv:1802.01635 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    Kumar, A

    R. Kumar, A. Kumar, and S. G. Ghosh, Astrophys. J.896, 89 (2020), arXiv:2006.09869 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Torres, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2208.12713 (2022), arXiv:2208.12713 [gr-qc]

    R. Torres, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2208.12713 (2022), arXiv:2208.12713 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Weinberg,Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Ap- plications of the General Theory of Relativity(Wiley, New York, 1972)

    S. Weinberg,Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Ap- plications of the General Theory of Relativity(Wiley, New York, 1972)

    1972

  38. [38]

    Z. Feng, Y . Ling, X. Wu, and Q. Jiang, Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron.67, 270412 (2024), arXiv:2308.15689 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Z. Feng, Q. Jiang, Y . Ling, X. Wu, and Z. Yu, Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron.68, 260412 (2025), arXiv:2408.01780 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Bardeen, inProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Gravitation and the Theory of Relativity(1968) p

    J. Bardeen, inProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Gravitation and the Theory of Relativity(1968) p. 87

    1968

  41. [41]

    T. A. Roman and P. G. Bergmann, Phys. Rev. D28, 1265 (1983)

    1983

  42. [42]

    S. A. Hayward, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 031103 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0506126 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2006

  43. [43]

    K. A. Bronnikov and J. C. Fabris, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 251101 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0511109 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  44. [44]

    Bambi and L

    C. Bambi and L. Modesto, Phys. Lett. B721, 329 (2013), arXiv:1302.6075 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  45. [45]

    Fan and X

    Z.-Y . Fan and X. Wang, Phys. Rev. D94, 124027 (2016), arXiv:1610.02636 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  46. [46]

    Huang and J

    H. Huang and J. Yang, Phys. Rev. D100, 124063 (2019), arXiv:1909.04603 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    Ovalle, R

    J. Ovalle, R. Casadio, and A. Giusti, Phys. Lett. B844, 138085 (2023), arXiv:2304.03263 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Bueno, P

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar, and ´A. J. Murcia, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 181401 (2025), arXiv:2412.02742 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Carballo-Rubio, F

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Phys. Rev. D98, 124009 (2018), arXiv:1809.08238 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    Li and Y .-G

    Y . Li and Y .-G. Miao, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 503 (2022), arXiv:2110.14201 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    Bargue ˜no, Phys

    P. Bargue ˜no, Phys. Rev. D102, 104028 (2020), arXiv:2008.02680 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  52. [52]

    Gao and X.-M

    B. Gao and X.-M. Deng, Ann. Phys.418, 168194 (2020)

    2020

  53. [54]

    Gao and X.-M

    B. Gao and X.-M. Deng, Mod. Phys. Lett. A36, 2150237 (2021)

    2021

  54. [55]

    M. E. Rodrigues and M. V . d. S. Silva, Phys. Rev. D107, 044064 (2023), arXiv:2302.10772 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  55. [56]

    Simpson and M

    A. Simpson and M. Visser, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2019, 042 (2019), arXiv:1812.07114 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  56. [57]

    J. R. Nascimento, A. Y . Petrov, P. J. Porf´ırio, and A. R. Soares, Phys. Rev. D102, 044021 (2020)

    2020

  57. [58]

    ¨Ovg¨un, Turk

    A. ¨Ovg¨un, Turk. J. Phys.44, 465 (2020), arXiv:2011.04423 11 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  58. [59]

    Tsukamoto, Phys

    N. Tsukamoto, Phys. Rev. D103, 024033 (2021), arXiv:2011.03932 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  59. [60]

    Tsukamoto, Phys

    N. Tsukamoto, Phys. Rev. D104, 064022 (2021), arXiv:2105.14336 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  60. [61]

    S. U. Islam, J. Kumar, and S. G. Ghosh, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2021, 013 (2021), arXiv:2104.00696 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  61. [62]

    Zhang and Y

    J. Zhang and Y . Xie, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 471 (2022)

    2022

  62. [63]

    Tsukamoto, Phys

    N. Tsukamoto, Phys. Rev. D105, 084036 (2022), arXiv:2202.09641 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  63. [64]

    Y . Guo, C. Lan, and Y .-G. Miao, Phys. Rev. D106, 124052 (2022)

    2022

  64. [65]

    Chowdhuri, S

    A. Chowdhuri, S. Ghosh, and A. Bhattacharyya, Front. Phys. 11, 1113909 (2023), arXiv:2303.02069 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  65. [66]

    Vagnozziet al., Classical and Quantum Gravity40, 165007 (2023), arXiv:2205.07787 [gr-qc]

    S. Vagnozziet al., Classical and Quantum Gravity40, 165007 (2023), arXiv:2205.07787 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  66. [67]

    Gao and L.-H

    K. Gao and L.-H. Liu, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2307.16627 (2023), arXiv:2307.16627 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  67. [68]

    Shaikh, Mon

    R. Shaikh, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.523, 375 (2023), arXiv:2208.01995 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  68. [69]

    Javed, M

    W. Javed, M. Atique, R. C. Pantig, and A. ¨Ovg¨un, Symmetry 15, 148 (2023)

    2023

  69. [70]

    Sarikulov, F

    F. Sarikulov, F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujabbarov, and V . Khami- dov, Chinese Phys. C47, 115101 (2023)

    2023

  70. [71]

    C. F. S. Pereira, A. R. Soares, M. V . d. S. Silva, R. L. L. Vit´oria, and H. Belich, Phys. Rev. D112, 064012 (2025), arXiv:2505.12577 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  71. [72]

    Bozza, S

    V . Bozza, S. Capozziello, G. Iovane, and G. Scarpetta, Gen. Rel. Grav.33, 1535 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0102068 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  72. [73]

    Bozza, Phys

    V . Bozza, Phys. Rev. D66, 103001 (2002), arXiv:gr- qc/0208075 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2002

  73. [74]

    Zhou and Y

    T.-Y . Zhou and Y . Xie, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 1070 (2020)

    2020

  74. [75]

    Zhang and Y

    J. Zhang and Y . Xie, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 854 (2022)

    2022

  75. [76]

    J. Vrba, J. Rayimbaev, Z. Stuchlik, and B. Ahmedov, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 854 (2023)

    2023

  76. [77]

    Murodov, K

    S. Murodov, K. Badalov, J. Rayimbaev, B. Ahmedov, and Z. Stuchlik, Symmetry16, 109 (2024)

    2024

  77. [78]

    G. He, Y . Xie, C. Jiang, and W. Lin, Phys. Rev. D110, 064008 (2024), arXiv:2402.01548 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  78. [79]

    Nishonov, M

    I. Nishonov, M. Zahid, S. U. Khan, J. Rayimbaev, and A. Ab- dujabbarov, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 829 (2024)

    2024

  79. [80]

    M. V . de S. Silva and M. E. Rodrigues, Int. J. Theor. Phys.63, 101 (2024), arXiv:2404.15792 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  80. [81]

    Bragado and G

    A. Bragado and G. J. Olmo, Classical and Quantum Gravity 42, 185004 (2025), arXiv:2506.15600 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.