arxiv: 2602.04743 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-04 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Relativistic and Recoil Corrections to Light-Fermion Vacuum Polarization for Bound Systems of Spin-0, Spin-1/2, and Spin-1 Particles

G. S. Adkins , U. D. Jentschura

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 07:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords vacuum polarizationrelativistic correctionsrecoil correctionsbound statesexotic atomsmuonic hydrogenpioniumdeuteronium

0 comments

The pith

Relativistic and recoil corrections to electronic vacuum polarization are generalized for bound systems with particle spins of zero, one-half, or one.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In systems where the bound particles are heavier than the electron, the leading radiative correction to energy levels comes from the one-loop light-fermion vacuum polarization. The paper extends earlier results limited to spin-1/2 orbiting particles by deriving the relativistic and recoil adjustments for spin-0, spin-1/2, and spin-1 constituents alike. These adjustments produce energy shifts of order alpha to the fifth power times the reduced mass. The expressions apply directly to systems such as pionium, muonic hydrogen and deuterium, and non-S states of deuteronium. A reader would care because the corrections improve the theoretical precision needed to interpret spectroscopic measurements in these exotic atoms.

Core claim

The one-loop electronic vacuum-polarization correction, when supplemented by relativistic and recoil effects, yields energy shifts of order alpha^5 m_r for bound states whose constituents carry spin 0, 1/2, or 1; explicit formulas are obtained by generalizing the earlier muon case and are illustrated for pionium, muonic hydrogen and deuterium, and excited states of deuteronium.

What carries the argument

The one-loop light-fermion vacuum-polarization potential together with its relativistic and recoil corrections, evaluated in the two-body bound-state framework for arbitrary constituent spins.

If this is right

Energy-level predictions for pionium improve by the inclusion of spin-0 recoil terms.
Muonic hydrogen and deuterium transition frequencies receive explicit alpha^5 corrections beyond the static vacuum-polarization potential.
Non-S states of deuteronium acquire previously unavailable relativistic-recoil vacuum-polarization shifts.
The same framework supplies the order-alpha^5 m_r piece for any two-body system whose constituents are heavier than the electron.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The generalized expressions could be inserted into existing bound-state codes to update theoretical tables for muonic atoms used in charge-radius determinations.
Similar spin-generalization steps might later be applied to two-loop or hadronic vacuum-polarization contributions once those are available.
Experimental programs that aim for 10^{-6} relative accuracy in exotic-atom spectroscopy will need these corrections to reach their target uncertainty.

Load-bearing premise

That the light-fermion vacuum polarization remains the dominant radiative correction when the heavier constituents move at relativistic speeds or recoil is included only perturbatively.

What would settle it

A precision measurement of an energy interval in muonic hydrogen or pionium that deviates from the calculated alpha^5 m_r shift by an amount larger than the combined experimental and higher-order theoretical uncertainty.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.04743 by G. S. Adkins, U. D. Jentschura.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. Graphs contributing to the spin-1 Breit Hamiltonian. Graph (a) represents the basic Coulomb interaction. Graphs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

In bound systems whose constituent particles are heavier than the electron, the dominant radiative correction to energy levels is given by light-fermion (electronic) vacuum polarization. In consequence, relativistic and recoil corrections to the one-loop vacuum-polarization correction are phenomenologically relevant. Here, we generalize the treatment, previously accomplished for systems with orbiting muons, to bound systems of constituents with more general spins: spin-0, spin-1/2, and spin-1. We discuss the application of our more general expressions to various systems of interest, including spinless systems (pionium), muonic hydrogen and deuterium, and devote special attention to the excited non-S states of deuteronium, the bound system of a deuteron and its antiparticle. The obtained energy corrections are of order alpha^5*m_r, where alpha is the fine-structure constant and m_r is the reduced mass.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper generalizes relativistic and recoil corrections to electronic vacuum polarization from muon systems to spin-0, 1/2, and 1 constituents, yielding new analytic expressions at order alpha^5 m_r.

read the letter

Hi colleague, The one or two things you should know about this paper are that it generalizes the relativistic and recoil corrections to light-fermion vacuum polarization from the muon case to systems with spin-0, spin-1/2, and spin-1 particles, and it gives new analytic expressions for the resulting energy corrections at order alpha^5 m_r. The paper does well in extending the prior treatment to a wider set of spins and then working out applications to several systems of interest. This includes spinless pionium, muonic hydrogen and deuterium, and especially the excited non-S states of deuteronium. They keep the approach consistent with the existing effective two-body framework, which allows for a direct generalization without introducing new parameters or ad hoc adjustments. The focus on deuteronium shows they have thought about where these corrections might matter for future experiments. Where it could be softer is in the handling of the spin-1 case. Treating the deuteron as point-like for the recoil and VP corrections might overlook contributions from its finite size or electromagnetic structure at the alpha^5 m_r level. The stress-test concern about form factors is worth checking against the full derivation; if those effects are not estimated or shown to be smaller, the results for deuteronium could need qualification. Overall, this is targeted at researchers doing high-precision QED calculations for exotic bound systems. A reader who needs updated formulas for energy levels in these atoms would find it useful and could incorporate the expressions into their own work. I would recommend sending it for peer review. The calculations appear grounded in established methods, the novelty is in the generalization, and the topic is narrow but relevant for the field. Best regards,

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript generalizes the calculation of relativistic and recoil corrections to the one-loop electronic vacuum polarization from systems with orbiting muons to two-body bound states whose constituents have spin 0, spin 1/2, or spin 1. The resulting energy corrections are stated to be of order α⁵ m_r and are applied to pionium, muonic hydrogen and deuterium, and especially the excited non-S states of deuteronium.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the work supplies phenomenologically relevant higher-order QED corrections for precision spectroscopy of exotic atoms in which electronic vacuum polarization is the leading radiative effect. Explicit results for a range of spins and systems would allow improved theoretical predictions that can be confronted with future measurements.

major comments (1)

[Abstract and deuteronium discussion] Abstract and deuteronium discussion: the generalization to spin-1 constituents treats the deuteron as point-like. The deuteron's finite charge radius and electromagnetic form factors can generate additional contributions to the effective potential or VP kernel at the same α⁵ m_r order; these are not shown to be absorbed into the spin-generalization framework.

minor comments (1)

The abstract refers to 'the obtained energy corrections' without indicating whether closed-form expressions for all three spin cases appear explicitly in the text or only in limiting cases.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comment. We address the point raised below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and deuteronium discussion] Abstract and deuteronium discussion: the generalization to spin-1 constituents treats the deuteron as point-like. The deuteron's finite charge radius and electromagnetic form factors can generate additional contributions to the effective potential or VP kernel at the same α⁵ m_r order; these are not shown to be absorbed into the spin-generalization framework.

Authors: Our generalization is for the relativistic and recoil corrections to the vacuum polarization potential assuming point-like constituents with the specified spins. The finite-size effects of the deuteron, including its charge radius and form factors, indeed contribute at the same order but arise from the electromagnetic structure of the deuteron rather than from the vacuum polarization. These contributions are independent and can be calculated separately using the known deuteron form factors and added to the total energy shift. Our framework does not claim to include them; it is limited to the VP corrections. We will revise the manuscript to explicitly state this distinction in the discussion of deuteronium to avoid any misunderstanding. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct perturbative generalization with independent prior calculations

full rationale

The paper generalizes an existing perturbative treatment of relativistic and recoil corrections to one-loop electronic vacuum polarization from muon systems to spin-0, spin-1/2, and spin-1 constituents at order alpha^5 m_r. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input or self-defined quantity by construction; the derivation uses standard two-body effective potentials and wave-function integrals without parameter fitting or renaming of known results. Prior work is cited for the muon case but functions as external input rather than a load-bearing self-citation chain, and the central expressions remain independently computable from QED Feynman rules.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard QED assumptions for vacuum polarization in bound states; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Light-fermion vacuum polarization is the dominant radiative correction when constituents are heavier than the electron
Stated directly in the abstract as the premise for treating relativistic and recoil corrections.
standard math Standard perturbative QED applies to the bound-state problem at order alpha^5 m_r
Implicit in the claim that the corrections are of order alpha^5 m_r.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5473 in / 1307 out tokens · 73433 ms · 2026-05-16T07:19:13.583411+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We generalize the treatment... to bound systems of constituents with more general spins: spin-0, spin-1/2, and spin-1. The obtained energy corrections are of order alpha^5*m_r.
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

NRQED Lagrangian... Feynman rules... Breit Hamiltonian... optimized Coulomb gauge photon propagator

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

[1]

This fact has recently been clarified in Ref

for then= 2 Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen. This fact has recently been clarified in Ref. [80], in the text preceding Eq. (21) of that reference, pointing out that a corresponding statement in [67] should properly refer only to the result of [79] and not to [63]. C. Hyperfine Structure of Muonic Hydrogen For the hyperfine structure of muonic hydrogen, we n...

work page
[2]

R. Pohl, A. Antognini, F. Nez, F. D. Amaro, F. Biraben, J. M. R. Cardoso, D. S. Covita, A. Dax, S. Dhawan, L. M. P. Fernandes, A. Giesen, T. Graf, T. W. H¨ ansch, P. Indelicato, L. Julien, C.-Y. Kao, P. Knowles, E.- O. Le Bigot, Y.-W. Liu, J. A. M. Lopes, L. Ludhova, C. M. B. Monteiro, F. Mulhauser, T. Nebel, P. Rabi- nowitz, J. M. F. dos Santos, L. A. Sc...

work page 2010
[3]

R. Pohl, F. Nez, F. D. Amaro, F. Biraben, J. M. R. Car- doso, D. S. Covita, A. Dax, S. Dhawan, M. Diepold, A. Giesen, A. L. Gouvea, T. Graf, T. W. H¨ ansch, P. Indeli- cato, L. Julien, P. Knowles, F. Kottmann, E.-O. Le Bigot, Y.-W. Liu, J. A. M. Lopes, L. Ludhova, C. M. B. Mon- teiro, F. Mulhauser, T. Nebel, P. Rabinowitz, J. M. F. dos Santos, L. A. Schal...

work page 2016
[4]

Pachucki, V

K. Pachucki, V. Lensky, F. Hagelstein, S. S. Li Muli, S. Bacca, and R. Pohl,Comprehensive theory of the Lamb shift in light muonic atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 015001 (2024)

work page 2024
[5]

Kong and F

X. Kong and F. Ravndal,Relativistic corrections to the pionium lifetime, Phys. Rev. D61, 077506 (2000)

work page 2000
[6]

Gasser, V

J. Gasser, V. E. Lyubovitskij, A. Rusetsky, and A. Gall, Decays ofπ + π− atom, Phys. Rev. D64, 016008 (2001)

work page 2001
[7]

U. D. Jentschura, G. Soff, and P. Indelicato,QED Effects and Breit Hamiltonian for Spinless Particles, J. Phys. B 35, 2459–2468 (2002)

work page 2002
[8]

Schweizer,Decay widths and energy shifts ofππand πKatoms, Phys

J. Schweizer,Decay widths and energy shifts ofππand πKatoms, Phys. Lett. B587, 33–40 (2004)

work page 2004
[9]

Schweizer,Spectra and decays ofππandπKatoms, Eur

J. Schweizer,Spectra and decays ofππandπKatoms, Eur. Phys. J. C36, 483–501 (2004)

work page 2004
[10]

Schweizer,Spectrum and Decays of Hadronic Atoms, Int

J. Schweizer,Spectrum and Decays of Hadronic Atoms, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A20, 358–364 (2005)

work page 2005
[11]

Gasser, V

J. Gasser, V. E. Lyubovitskij, and A. Rusetsky,Hadronic atoms in QCD + QED, Phys. Rep.456, 167–251 (2008)

work page 2008
[12]

Gasser, V

J. Gasser, V. E. Lyubovitskij, and A. Rusetsky,Hadronic Atoms, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.59, 169–190 (2009)

work page 2009
[13]

Adevaet al.[DIRAC Collaboration],First measure- ment of theπ +π− atom lifetime, Phys

B. Adevaet al.[DIRAC Collaboration],First measure- ment of theπ +π− atom lifetime, Phys. Lett. B619, 50– 60 (2005)

work page 2005
[14]

First observation of long-lived $\pi^+ \pi^-$ atoms

B. Adevaet al.[DIRAC Collaboration],First observation of long-livedπ +π− atoms, e-print arXiv:1508.04712 [hep- ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[15]

See the web page of the Pionic Hydrogen Collabo- ration at https://collaborations.fz-juelich.de/ikp/exotic- atoms/index.php

work page
[16]

V. E. Lyubovitskij and A. Rusetsky,π −patom in ChPT: strong energy-level shift, Phys. Lett. B494, 9–18 (2000)

work page 2000
[17]

Hauseret al.[PSI Pionic Hydrogen Collaboration], New precision measurement of the pionic deuteriums- wave strong interaction parameters, Phys

P. Hauseret al.[PSI Pionic Hydrogen Collaboration], New precision measurement of the pionic deuteriums- wave strong interaction parameters, Phys. Rev. D58, 1869(R)–1872(R) (1998)

work page 1998
[18]

Meißner, U

U.-G. Meißner, U. Raha, and A. Rusetsky,The pion- nucleon scattering lengths from pionic deuterium, Eur. Phys. J. C41, 213–232 (2005)

work page 2005
[19]

Beeret al.[DEAR Collaboration],Measurement of the Kaonic Hydrogen X–Ray Spectrum, Phys

G. Beeret al.[DEAR Collaboration],Measurement of the Kaonic Hydrogen X–Ray Spectrum, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 212302 (2005)

work page 2005
[20]

Meißner, U

U.-G. Meißner, U. Raha, and A. Rusetsky,Kaon–nucleon scattering lengths from kaonic deuterium experiments, Eur. Phys. J. C47, 473–480 (2006)

work page 2006
[21]

D¨ oring and U.-G

M. D¨ oring and U.-G. Meißner,Kaon–nucleon scatter- ing lengths from kaonic deuterium experiments revisited, Phys. Lett. B704, 663–666 (2011)

work page 2011
[22]

Wycech, A

S. Wycech, A. M. Green, and J. A. Niskanen,On the energy levels in antiprotonic deuterium, Phys. Lett. B 152, 308–312 (1985)

work page 1985
[23]

Y. Yan, K. Khosonthongkee, C. Kobdaj, P. Suebka, Th. Gutsche, A. Faessler, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, ¯pD atoms in realistic potentials, Phys. Lett. B659, 555 (2008)

work page 2008
[24]

Lazauskas and J

R. Lazauskas and J. Carbonell,Antiproton-deuteron hy- drogenic states in optical models, Phys. Lett. B820, 136573 (2021)

work page 2021
[25]

Antiproton-deuteron hydrogenic states in optical models

P.-Y. Duerinck, R. Lazauskas, and J. Carbonell,Cor- rigendum to “Antiproton-deuteron hydrogenic states in optical models” [Phys. Lett. B 820 (2021) 136573], Phys. Lett. B841, 137936 (2023)

work page 2021
[26]

Duerinck, R

P.-Y. Duerinck, R. Lazauskas, and J. Dohet-Eraly, Antiproton-deuteron hydrogenic states from a coupled- channel approach, Phys. Rev. C108, 054003 (2023)

work page 2023
[27]

Baptista, S

G. Baptista, S. Rathi, M. Roosa, Q. Senetaire, J. Som- merfeldt, T. Azuma, D. Becker, F. Butin, O. Eizen- berg, J. Fowler, H. Fujioka, D. Gamba, N. Garroum, M. Guerra, T. Hashimoto, T. Higuchi, P. Indelicato, J. Machado, K. Morgan, F. Nez, J. Nobles, B. Ohayon, S. Okada, D. Schmidt, D. Swetz, J. Ullom, P. Yzom- bard, M. Zito, and N. Paul,Towards Precision...

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

C. B. Dover and J. M. Richard,Elastic, charge exchange, and inelastic¯p pcross sections in the optical model, Phys. Rev. C21, 1466–1471 (1980)

work page 1980
[29]

C. J. Batty,Antiprotonic-hydrogen atoms, Rep. Prog. Phys.52, 1165–1216 (1989)

work page 1989
[30]

Carbonell, J.-M

J. Carbonell, J.-M. Richard, and S. Wycech,On the relation between protonium level shifts and nu- cleon–antinucleon scattering amplitudes, Z. Phys. A343, 325–329 (1992)

work page 1992
[31]

Klempt, F

E. Klempt, F. Bradamante, A. Martin, and J.-M. Richard,Antinucleon–nucleon interaction at low energy: scattering and protonium, Phys. Rep.368, 119–316 (2002)

work page 2002
[32]

G. S. Adkins and U. D. Jentschura,Bound Deuteron– Antideuteron System (Deuteronium): Leading Radiative and Internal–Structure Corrections to Bound-State En- ergies, Phys. Rev. Research7, 043300 (2025)

work page 2025
[33]

A. J. Krasznahorkay, M. Csatl´ os, L. Csige, Z. G´ acsi, J. Guly´ as, M. Hunyadi, I. Kuti, B. M. Nyak´ o, L. Stuhl, J. Tim´ ar, T. G. Tornyi, Zs. Vajta, T. J. Ketel, and A. Krasznahorkay,Observation of Anomalous Internal Pair Creation in 8Be: A Possible Indication of a Light, Neu- tral Boson, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 042501 (2016)

work page 2016
[34]

A. J. Krasznahorkay, M. Csatl´ os, L. Csige, J. Guly´ as, M. Hunyadi, T. J. Ketel, A. Krasznahorkay, I. Kuti, ´A. Nagy, B. M. Nyak´ o, N. Sas, J. Tim´ ar, and I. Vajda,New experimental results for the17 MeVparticle created in 8Be, Eur. Phys. J. Web of Conferences137, 08010 (2017)

work page 2017
[35]

A. J. Krasznahorkay, M. Csatl´ os, L. Csige, J. Guly´ as, T. J. Ketel, A. Krasznahorkay, I. Kuti, ´A. Nagy, B. M. Nyak´ o, N. Sas, and J. Tim´ ar,On the creation of the 17 MeVX boson in the17.6MeV M1 transition of 8Be, Eur. Phys. J. Web of Conferences142, 01019 (2017)

work page 2017
[36]

A. J. Krasznahorkay, M. Csatl´ os, L. Csige, J. Guly´ as, M. Koszta, B. Szihalmi, J. Tim´ ar, D. S. Firak, ´A. Nagy, N. J. Sas, and A. Krasznahorkay, New evidence support- ing the existence of the hypothetic X17 particle, e-print arXiv:1910.10459 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 1910
[37]

D. S. M. Alves, D. Barducci, G. Cavoto, L. Darm´ e, L. Delle Rose, L. Doria, J. L. Feng, A. Frankenthal, A. Gasparian, E. Goudzovski, C. Gustavino, S. Khalil, V. 17 Kozhuharov, A. J. Krasznahorkay, T. Marchi, M. Meucci, G. A. Miller, S. Moretti, M. Nardecchia, E. Nardi, H. Na- tal da Luz, G. Organtini, A. Papa, A.-K. Perrevoort, V. Petousis, G. Piperno, M...

work page 2023
[38]

A. J. Krasznahorkay, A. Krasznahorkay, M. Csatl´ os, J. Tim´ ar, M. Begala, A. Krak´ o, I. Rajta, I. Vajda, and N. J. Sas,An update on the hypothetical X17 particle, Universe 10, 409 (2024)

work page 2024
[39]

U. D. Jentschura, G. Soff, V. G. Ivanov, and S. G. Karshenboim,Boundµ +µ− system, Phys. Rev. A56, 4483–4495 (1997)

work page 1997
[40]

S. G. Karshenboim, U. D. Jentschura, V. G. Ivanov, and G. Soff,Next-to-leading and higher order corrections to the decay rate of dimuonium, Phys. Lett. B424, 397–404 (1998)

work page 1998
[41]

I. F. Ginzburg, U. D. Jentschura, S. G. Karshenboim, F. Krauss, V. G. Serbo, and G. Soff,Production of bound µ+µ− systems in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C58, 3565–3573 (1998)

work page 1998
[42]

V. W. Hughes and B. Maglic,True Muonium, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc.16, 65–66 (1971)

work page 1971
[43]

S. J. Brodsky and R. F. Lebed,Production of the Smallest QED Atom: True Muonium (µ +µ−), Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 213401 (2009)

work page 2009
[44]

K¨ all´ en and A

G. K¨ all´ en and A. Sabry,Fourth Order Vacuum Polar- ization, Kong. Dan. Vid. Sel. Mat. Fys. Med.29, 1–20 (1955)

work page 1955
[45]

Schwinger,Particles, Sources and Fields (Volume III) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989)

J. Schwinger,Particles, Sources and Fields (Volume III) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989)

work page 1989
[46]

Blomqvist,Vacuum Polarization in Exotic Atoms, Nucl

J. Blomqvist,Vacuum Polarization in Exotic Atoms, Nucl. Phys. B48, 95–103 (1972)

work page 1972
[47]

Huang,Calculation of the vacuum-polarization po- tential, Phys

K.-N. Huang,Calculation of the vacuum-polarization po- tential, Phys. Rev. A14, 1311–1318 (1976)

work page 1976
[48]

Borie and G

E. Borie and G. A. Rinker,The energy levels of muonic atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys.54, 67–118 (1982)

work page 1982
[49]

Laporta and U

S. Laporta and U. D. Jentschura,Dimensional Regu- larization and Two–Loop Vacuum Polarization Opera- tor: Master Integrals, Analytic Results and Energy Shifts, Phys. Rev. D109, 096020 (2024)

work page 2024
[50]

Kinoshita and W

T. Kinoshita and W. B. Lindquist,Parametric formula for the sixth-order vacuum polarization contribution in quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D27, 853–866 (1983)

work page 1983
[51]

D. J. Broadhurst, A. L. Kataev, and O. V. Tarasov,Ana- lytical on-shell QED results: 3-loop vacuum polarization, 4-loopβ-function and the muon anomaly, Phys. Lett. B 298, 445–452 (1993)

work page 1993
[52]

P. A. Baikov and D. J. Broadhurst,Three–loop QED Vac- uum Polarization and the Four–loop Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment, e-print arXiv:hep-ph/9504398

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[53]

Kinoshita and M

T. Kinoshita and M. Nio,Sixth-Order Vacuum- Polarization Contribution to the Lamb Shift of Muonic Hydrogen, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 3240–3243 (1999), [Erra- tum Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 079901 (2009)]

work page 1999
[54]

Kinoshita and M

T. Kinoshita and M. Nio,Accuracy of calculations involv- ingα 3 vacuum-polarization diagrams: Muonic hydrogen Lamb shift and muong−2, Phys. Rev. D60, 053008 (1999)

work page 1999
[55]

V. G. Ivanov, E. Yu. Korzinin, and S. G. Karshenboim, Second-order corrections to the wave function at the ori- gin in muonic hydrogen and pionium, Phys. Rev. D80, 027702 (2017)

work page 2017
[56]

A. I. Onishchenko, Three-loop photon spectral density in QED, e-print arXiv:2212.03502v1 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[57]

G. S. Adkins and U. D. Jentschura,Irreducible Three–Loop Vacuum–Polarization Correction in Muonic Bound Systems, Phys. Rev. D111, 056016 (2025)

work page 2025
[58]

Forner, C

F. Forner, C. Nega, and L. Tancredi,On the photon self- energy to three loops in QED, J. High Energy Phys.2503, 148 (2025)

work page 2025
[59]

U. D. Jentschura and G. S. Adkins,Quantum Electro- dynamics: Atoms, Lasers and Gravity(World Scientific, Singapore, 2022)

work page 2022
[60]

Pachucki,Theory of the Lamb shift in muonic hydro- gen, Phys

K. Pachucki,Theory of the Lamb shift in muonic hydro- gen, Phys. Rev. A53, 2092–2100 (1996)

work page 2092
[61]

U. D. Jentschura,Relativistic Reduced–Mass and Recoil Corrections to Vacuum Polarization in Muonic Hydro- gen, Muonic Deuterium and Muonic Helium Ions, Phys. Rev. A84, 012505 (2011)

work page 2011
[63]

Borie,Lamb Shift in Light Muonic Atoms–Revisited, Ann

E. Borie,Lamb Shift in Light Muonic Atoms–Revisited, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)327, 733–763 (2012)

work page 2012
[64]

Veitia and K

A. Veitia and K. Pachucki,Nuclear recoil effects in an- tiprotonic and muonic atoms, Phys. Rev. A69, 042501 (2004)

work page 2004
[65]

S. G. Karshenboim, V. G. Ivanov, and E. Yu. Korzinin, Relativistic recoil corrections to the electron-vacuum- polarization contribution in light muonic atoms, Phys. Rev. A85, 032509 (2012)

work page 2012
[66]

E. Yu. Korzinin, V. G. Ivanov, and S. G. Karshenboim, α2(Zα) 4mcontributions to the Lamb shift and the fine structure in light muonic atoms, Phys. Rev. D88, 125019 (2013)

work page 2013
[67]

S. G. Karshenboim, E. Yu. Korzinin, V. A. Shelyuto, and V. G. Ivanov,Theory of the Lamb shift in muonic tritium and the muonic 3He ion, Phys. Rev. A96, 022505 (2017)

work page 2017
[68]

G. S. Adkins and U. D. Jentschura, Relativistic and Reduced–Mass Corrections to Vacuum Polarization in Muonic Systems: Three–Photon Exchange, Gauge In- variance and Numerical Values, Phys. Rev. A110, 032816 (2024)

work page 2024
[69]

E. A. Uehling,Polarization Effects in the Positron The- ory, Phys. Rev.48, 55–63 (1935)

work page 1935
[70]

G. S. Adkins and U. D. Jentschura,Bound Deuteron– Antideuteron System:α 5 Energy Corrections, in prepa- ration (2025)

work page 2025
[71]

G. S. Adkins and U. D. Jentschura,Short–Range Hard–Sphere Potential and Coulomb Interaction: Deser–Trueman Formula for Rydberg States of Exotic Atomic Systems, Atoms13, 081 (2025)

work page 2025
[72]

Zatorski and K

J. Zatorski and K. Pachucki,Electrodynamics of finite- size particles with arbitrary spin, Phys. Rev. A82, 052520 (2010)

work page 2010
[73]

Zatorski, V

J. Zatorski, V. Patk´ oˇ s, and K. Pachucki,Quantum elec- trodynamics of two-body systems with arbitrary masses up toα 6 order, Phys. Rev. A106, 042804 (2022)

work page 2022
[74]

P. J. Mohr, D. B. Newell, B. N. Taylor, and E. Tiesinga, CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physi- cal constants: 2022, Rev. Mod. Phys.97, 025002 (2025)

work page 2022
[75]

Pachucki and S

K. Pachucki and S. G. Karshenboim,Nuclear-spin- dependent recoil correction to the Lamb shift, J. Phys. B28, L221–L224 (1995)

work page 1995
[76]

U. D. Jentschura,Proton Radius, Darwin-Foldy Term and Radiative Corrections, Eur. Phys. J. D61, 7–14 (2011). 18

work page 2011
[77]

X. Gao, N. Karthik, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, S. Syrit- syn, and Y. Zhao,Pion form factor and charge radius from lattice QCD at the physical point, Phys. Rev. D104, 114515 (2021)

work page 2021
[78]

Z.-F. Cui, D. Binosi, C. D. Robert, and S. M. Schmidt, Pion charge radius from pion+electron elastic scattering data, Phys. Lett. B822, 136631 (2021)

work page 2021
[79]

Navaset al.[Particle Data Group],Review of Particle Physics, Phys

S. Navaset al.[Particle Data Group],Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

work page 2024
[80]

Lamb Shift in Light Muonic Atoms - Revisited

E. Borie, e-print arXiv:1103.1772v5 (physics.atom-ph)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[81]

Patk´ oˇ s and K

V. Patk´ oˇ s and K. Pachucki,Antiprotonic atoms with non- perturbative inclusion of vacuum polarization and finite nuclear mass, Phys. Rev. A112, 052808 (2025)

work page 2025

Showing first 80 references.