pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.05040 · v2 · pith:KIFFKYQDnew · submitted 2026-02-04 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · quant-ph

Minimal Hamiltonian deformations as bulk probes of effective non-Hermiticity in Dirac materials

Sergio Pino-Alarc\'on , Juan Pablo Esparza , Vladimir Juri\v{c}i\'c This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 13:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph
keywords non-Hermitian Dirac semimetalpseudo-Lorentz symmetryDirac cone tilteffective non-Hermiticityquantum geometryoptical conductivityshear viscositybulk response
0
0 comments X

The pith

Minimal deformations of the Dirac Hamiltonian separate irreducible non-Hermitian effects from simple parameter renormalizations in materials whose spectra remain real.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Non-Hermitian Dirac semimetals at charge neutrality often look like ordinary Hermitian systems because their effects can be absorbed into renormalized velocities or other band parameters when the spectrum stays real. The paper shows that minimal deformations breaking pseudo-Lorentz symmetry provide a response-based way to identify which observables carry genuine non-Hermitian content that cannot be removed by redefinition. This distinction matters for open gain-loss systems because it supplies concrete bulk probes, such as the density of states under tilt or the tensor structure of shear viscosity, that remain sensitive to effective non-Hermiticity even without complex eigenvalues. The authors work in the weak non-Hermitian two-dimensional regime and compute spectral, geometric, optical, and viscoelastic quantities at zero temperature to demonstrate the separation.

Core claim

For a two-dimensional non-Hermitian Dirac semimetal in the weak-NH real-spectrum regime, minimal pseudo-Lorentz-symmetry-breaking deformations formulate a response-based diagnostic of effective non-Hermiticity. Tilt produces an NH-dependent slope in the density of states that resists collapse to a single effective velocity, while velocity anisotropy reduces to reparametrization. The quantum metric and collisionless optical conductivities remain NH-insensitive once symmetry selection is applied, whereas shear viscosity discriminates through its tensor structure.

What carries the argument

minimal pseudo-Lorentz-symmetry-breaking deformations of the Hamiltonian, which isolate observables that survive parameter redefinition from those that exhibit irreducible non-Hermitian structure

If this is right

  • Tilt in the Dirac cone yields a density of states slope that depends on non-Hermitian parameters and cannot be reproduced by velocity renormalization alone.
  • Velocity anisotropy is fully absorbed into an effective-velocity reparametrization.
  • The quantum metric and linear optical conductivities serve as NH-insensitive benchmarks.
  • Shear viscosity distinguishes non-Hermitian effects via differences in its tensor structure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same minimal-deformation strategy could be tested in three-dimensional Dirac or Weyl materials to locate analogous irreducible responses.
  • Strain or electric-field protocols that induce controlled tilt or anisotropy offer a route to experimental verification of the diagnostic.
  • Response functions beyond the spectrum itself become the primary tools for detecting effective non-Hermiticity in open condensed-matter systems.

Load-bearing premise

Non-Hermitian terms remain weak enough that the energy spectrum stays entirely real.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the density of states for a tilted non-Hermitian Dirac cone that checks whether its slope can be matched by any choice of effective velocity or instead requires additional non-Hermitian parameters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.05040 by Juan Pablo Esparza, Sergio Pino-Alarc\'on, Vladimir Juri\v{c}i\'c.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Polarization diagram corresponding to Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Feynman diagram corresponding to the stress corre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Components of the shear viscosity tensor for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Non-Hermitian (NH) Dirac semimetals describe open gain--loss systems. Yet at charge neutrality, models featuring real spectrum often look Hermitian-like, with NH effects absorbed into renormalized band parameters. Here, we show that a response-based diagnostic of effective non-Hermiticity can be formulated using minimal pseudo-Lorentz-symmetry-breaking deformations, which separate observables that remain captured by parameter redefinitions from those that exhibit irreducible NH structure. For a two-dimensional NH Dirac semimetal in the weak-NH, real-spectrum regime, we analyze Dirac-cone tilt and velocity anisotropy and compute representative probes of spectral structure, quantum geometry, optical response, and viscoelasticity at zero temperature. We find that tilt yields an NH-dependent slope of the density of states that cannot be collapsed to a single effective velocity, while velocity anisotropy can be captured by effective-velocity reparametrization. Furthermore, the quantum metric and collisionless optical conductivities provide NH-insensitive benchmarks (with the nonlinear conductivity symmetry selected), whereas the shear viscosity offers a discriminator through its tensor structure. Our results identify minimal deformations and bulk response channels that enable access to effective non-Hermiticity even when the spectrum remains real.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a response-based diagnostic for effective non-Hermiticity in Dirac materials by introducing minimal pseudo-Lorentz-symmetry-breaking Hamiltonian deformations. In the two-dimensional NH Dirac semimetal at weak non-Hermiticity with real spectrum, it separates tilt and velocity anisotropy deformations and evaluates their impact on the density of states, quantum metric, collisionless optical conductivities, and shear viscosity at zero temperature. The central result is that tilt produces an NH-dependent DOS slope that cannot be absorbed into a single effective velocity, while anisotropy is reparametrizable; quantum metric and selected optical conductivities remain NH-insensitive, whereas shear viscosity discriminates through its tensor structure.

Significance. If the separation between reparametrizable and irreducible NH observables is shown to hold against the most general Hermitian effective theory, the work supplies concrete bulk probes (DOS slope under tilt, viscosity tensor) for detecting effective non-Hermiticity even when the spectrum is real. This is useful for open quantum systems in mesoscopic Dirac materials and supplies falsifiable predictions for transport and spectroscopic experiments.

major comments (1)
  1. The load-bearing claim that tilt yields an NH-dependent DOS slope irreducible to Hermitian redefinitions (abstract and the section computing the DOS for the tilted case) assumes the chosen minimal deformations exhaust all symmetry-allowed Hermitian reparametrizations. In the perturbative weak-NH real-spectrum regime a sufficiently general Hermitian effective theory (direction-dependent velocity renormalizations plus possible tilt adjustments) might still absorb the effect; the manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that the comparison was performed against this most general ansatz rather than a restricted one, otherwise the distinction between reparametrizable and irreducible NH structure is not established.
minor comments (3)
  1. Clarify the precise definition and symmetry properties of the 'minimal' deformations in the Hamiltonian section; the current presentation leaves open whether additional symmetry-allowed terms could be included without changing the conclusions.
  2. Add a short table or explicit comparison listing the effective parameters for the Hermitian versus NH cases for each observable; this would make the separation more transparent to readers.
  3. Improve figure captions to explicitly state which curves correspond to Hermitian limits and which retain irreducible NH contributions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for identifying a key point that strengthens the central claim of the manuscript. The major comment concerns the generality of the Hermitian comparison used to establish the irreducibility of the NH-dependent DOS slope under tilt. We address this below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The load-bearing claim that tilt yields an NH-dependent DOS slope irreducible to Hermitian reparametrizations (abstract and the section computing the DOS for the tilted case) assumes the chosen minimal deformations exhaust all symmetry-allowed Hermitian reparametrizations. In the perturbative weak-NH real-spectrum regime a sufficiently general Hermitian effective theory (direction-dependent velocity renormalizations plus possible tilt adjustments) might still absorb the effect; the manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that the comparison was performed against this most general ansatz rather than a restricted one, otherwise the distinction between reparametrizable and irreducible NH structure is not established.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration against the most general Hermitian ansatz is required to fully substantiate the distinction. Our minimal deformations were selected as the leading pseudo-Lorentz-symmetry-breaking perturbations that isolate tilt from anisotropy while preserving the real-spectrum condition at weak NH. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated comparison (new subsection in Sec. III or an appendix) that parameterizes the most general Hermitian Dirac Hamiltonian allowed by the same symmetries, including arbitrary direction-dependent velocity renormalizations and independent tilt adjustments. We will then recompute the zero-temperature DOS for this general Hermitian case and show that any resulting slope can always be absorbed into a redefinition of the effective velocities, in contrast to the irreducible linear-in-NH correction that appears only when the underlying Hamiltonian is non-Hermitian. This explicit check will confirm that the reported NH-dependent DOS slope cannot be reproduced by Hermitian reparametrizations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation remains self-contained via explicit response calculations.

full rationale

The paper derives its central diagnostic by computing specific bulk responses (DOS slope, quantum metric, optical conductivity, shear viscosity) under minimal tilt and anisotropy deformations in the weak-NH real-spectrum regime. These calculations compare NH models directly against Hermitian reparametrizations without reducing any claimed NH-dependent feature to a fitted input or self-citation chain. The separation between tilt (irreducible) and anisotropy (reparametrizable) follows from the explicit forms of the response functions rather than from an assumed uniqueness theorem or ansatz smuggled via prior work. No load-bearing step equates a prediction to its own definition or input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that the system remains in the weak non-Hermitian regime with real spectrum; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The two-dimensional NH Dirac semimetal is analyzed in the weak-NH, real-spectrum regime.
    Explicitly stated as the setting for the tilt, anisotropy, and response calculations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5754 in / 1289 out tokens · 41726 ms · 2026-05-21T13:23:56.623171+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Atiyah--Singer Index Theorem for Non-Hermitian Dirac Operators

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The index of non-Hermitian Dirac operators that anticommute with a chirality operator is topologically protected when the operators are diagonalizable and elliptic.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    El-Ganainy, K

    R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non- hermitian physics and PT symmetry, Nature Physics14, 11 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Ashida, Z

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-hermitian physics, Advances in Physics69, 249 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Ex- ceptional topology of non-hermitian systems, Reviews of Modern Physics93, 015005 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Miri and A

    M.-A. Miri and A. Alù, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science363, eaar7709 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Juričić and B

    V. Juričić and B. Roy, Yukawa-lorentz symmetry in non- hermitian dirac materials, Communications Physics7, 169 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    S. A. Murshed and B. Roy, Quantum electrodynamics of non-hermitian dirac fermions, Journal of High Energy Physics2024, 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    X.-J. Yu, Z. Pan, L. Xu, and Z.-X. Li, Non-hermitian strongly interacting dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 116503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    S. A. Murshed and B. Roy, Yukawa-lorentz symmetry of interacting non-hermitian birefringent dirac fermions, SciPost Phys.18, 073 (2025)

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    C. A. Leong and B. Roy, Amplified magnetic catalysis in non-hermitian euclidean and hyperbolic dirac liquids (2025), arXiv:2510.02304 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Roy, Zero modes and index theorems for non- hermitian dirac fermions, Phys

    B. Roy, Zero modes and index theorems for non- hermitian dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. D112, 125016 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    J. P. Esparza and V. Juričić, Exceptional magic angles in non-hermitian twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 226602 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Reviews of Modern Physics81, 109 (2009)

    work page 2009

  13. [13]

    N.P.Armitage, E.J.Mele,andA.Vishwanath,Weyland dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids, Reviews of Modern Physics90, 015001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    Polini, F

    M. Polini, F. Guinea, M. Lewenstein, H. C. Manoharan, and V. Pellegrini, Artificial honeycomb lattices for elec- trons, atoms and photons, Nature Nanotechnology8, 625 (2013). 11

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    Tarruell, D

    L. Tarruell, D. Greif, T. Uehlinger, G. Jotzu, and T. Esslinger, Creating, moving and merging dirac points with a fermi gas in a tunable honeycomb lattice, Nature 483, 302 (2012)

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    Plotnik, O

    Y. Plotnik, O. Peleg, F. Dreisow, M. Heinrich, S. Nolte, A. Szameit, and M. Segev, Observation of unconventional edge states in photonic graphene, Nature Materials13, 57 (2014)

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    V. M. Martinez Alvarez, J. E. Barrios Vargas, and L. E. F. Foa Torres, Non-hermitian robust edge states in one dimension: Anomalous localization and eigenspace condensation at exceptional points, Phys. Rev. B97, 121401 (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Yao and Z

    S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological in- variants of non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 086803 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    C. H. Lee and R. Thomale, Anatomy of skin modes and topology in non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B99, 201103 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    D. S. Borgnia, A. J. Kruchkov, and R.-J. Slager, Non- hermitian boundary modes and topology, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 056802 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Zhang, Z

    K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Correspondence be- tween winding numbers and skin modes in non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 126402 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [23]

    D. J. Salib, S. K. Das, and B. Roy, Model non- hermitian topological operators without skin effect (2023), arXiv:2309.12310 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [24]

    Okuma, K

    N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Topological origin of non-hermitian skin effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 086801 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [25]

    K.Zhang, Z.Yang,andC.Fang,Universalnon-hermitian skin effect in two and higher dimensions, Nat. Commun. 13, 2496 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [26]

    J. H. D. Rivero, L. Feng, and L. Ge, Imaginary gauge transformationinmomentumspaceanddiracexceptional point, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 243901 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [27]

    Hu, Topological origin of non-hermitian skin effect in higher dimensions and uniform spectra, Science Bulletin 70, 51 (2025)

    H. Hu, Topological origin of non-hermitian skin effect in higher dimensions and uniform spectra, Science Bulletin 70, 51 (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [28]

    W. D. Heiss, The physics of exceptional points, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.45, 444016 (2012)

    work page 2012

  28. [29]

    Kawabata, T

    K. Kawabata, T. Bessho, and M. Sato, Classifica- tion of exceptional points and non-hermitian topological semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 066405 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [30]

    D. C. Brody, Biorthogonal quantum mechanics, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.47, 035305 (2014)

    work page 2014

  30. [31]

    F. K. Kunst, E. Edvardsson, J. C. Budich, and E. J. Bergholtz, Biorthogonal bulk-boundary correspondence in non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 026808 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [32]

    M. O. Goerbig, J.-N. Fuchs, G. Montambaux, and F. Pié- chon, Tilted anisotropic dirac cones in quinoid-type graphene andα−(BEDT-TTF)2i3, Phys. Rev. B78, 045415 (2008)

    work page 2008

  32. [33]

    Trescher, B

    M. Trescher, B. Sbierski, P. W. Brouwer, and E. J. Bergholtz, Quantum transport in dirac materials: Sig- natures of tilted and anisotropic dirac and weyl cones, Phys. Rev. B91, 115135 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [34]

    Varykhalov, D

    A. Varykhalov, D. Marchenko, J. Sánchez-Barriga, E. Golias, O. Rader, and G. Bihlmayer, Tilted dirac cone on w(110) protected by mirror symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 95, 245421 (2017)

    work page 2017

  34. [35]

    G. E. Volovik and K. Zhang, Lifshitz transitions, type- ii dirac and weyl fermions, event horizon and all that, Journal of Low Temperature Physics189, 276 (2017)

    work page 2017

  35. [36]

    T. S. Sikkenk and L. Fritz, Disorder in tilted weyl semimetals from a renormalization group perspective, Phys. Rev. B96, 155121 (2017)

    work page 2017

  36. [37]

    Reiser and V

    P. Reiser and V. Juričić, Tilted dirac superconductor at quantum criticality: restoration of lorentz symmetry, Journal of High Energy Physics2024, 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [38]

    Hu and F

    H. Hu and F. Krüger, Quantum criticality of type-i and critically tilted dirac semimetals, Physica C: Supercon- ductivity and its Applications632, 1354687 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [39]

    C.-Y. Moon, J. Han, H. Lee, and H. J. Choi, Low-velocity anisotropic dirac fermions on the side surface of topolog- ical insulators, Phys. Rev. B84, 195425 (2011)

    work page 2011

  39. [40]

    Z. K. Liu, B. Zhou, Y. Zhang, Z. J. Wang, H. M. Weng, D. Prabhakaran, S.-K. Mo, Z. X. Shen, Z. Fang, X. Dai, et al., Discovery of a three-dimensional topological dirac semimetal, na3bi, Science343, 864 (2014)

    work page 2014

  40. [41]

    Z. K. Liu, J. Jiang, B. Zhou, Z. J. Wang, Y. Zhang, H. M. Weng, D. Prabhakaran, S. K. Mo, H. Peng, P. Dudin,et al., A stable three-dimensional topological dirac semimetal cd3as2, Nature Materials13, 677 (2014)

    work page 2014

  41. [42]

    Y. I. Rodionov, K. I. Kugel, and F. Nori, Effects of anisotropy and disorder on the conductivity of weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B92, 195117 (2015)

    work page 2015

  42. [43]

    Mastrogiuseppe, N

    D. Mastrogiuseppe, N. Sandler, and S. E. Ulloa, Hy- bridization and anisotropy in the exchange interaction in three-dimensional dirac semimetals, Phys. Rev. B93, 094433 (2016)

    work page 2016

  43. [44]

    O. Pozo, Y. Ferreiros, and M. A. H. Vozmediano, Anisotropic fixed points in dirac and weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B98, 115122 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [45]

    W. Ma, Z. Yang, D. Ma, Z. Lv, and Z. Liu, Prediction of a two-dimensional anisotropic dirac semimetal carbon allotrope with high strength and quasi-one-dimensional transport, Phys. Rev. B112, 094111 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [46]

    Provost and G

    J.-P. Provost and G. Vallée, Riemannian structure on manifolds of quantum states, Commun. Math. Phys.76, 289 (1980)

    work page 1980

  46. [47]

    H. Shen, B. Zhen, and L. Fu, Topological band theory for non-hermitian hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 146402 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [48]

    Ozawa, Steady-state hall response and quantum ge- ometry of driven-dissipative lattices, Phys

    T. Ozawa, Steady-state hall response and quantum ge- ometry of driven-dissipative lattices, Phys. Rev. B97, 041108 (2018)

    work page 2018

  48. [49]

    D.-J.Zhang, Q.-h.Wang,andJ.Gong,Quantumgeomet- ric tensor inPT-symmetric quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. A99, 042104 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [50]

    Zhang and B

    Q. Zhang and B. Wu, Non-hermitian quantum systems and their geometric phases, Phys. Rev. A99, 032121 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [51]

    Y.-Q. Zhu, W. Zheng, S.-L. Zhu, and G. Palumbo, Band topology of pseudo-hermitian phases through ten- sor berry connections and quantum metric, Phys. Rev. B 104, 205103 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [52]

    D. D. Solnyshkov, C. Leblanc, L. Bessonart, A. Nalitov, J.Ren, Q.Liao, F.Li,andG.Malpuech,Quantummetric and wave packets at exceptional points in non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B103, 125302 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [53]

    Y.-M. R. Hu, E. A. Ostrovskaya, and E. Estrecho, Gen- eralized quantum geometric tensor in a non-hermitian 12 exciton-polariton system [invited], Opt. Mater. Express 14, 664 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [54]

    Ozawa and H

    T. Ozawa and H. Schomerus, Geometric contribution to adiabatic amplification in non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 013173 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [55]

    A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 109 (2009)

    work page 2009

  55. [56]

    Pino-Alarcón and V

    S. Pino-Alarcón and V. Juričić, Yukawa-lorentz symme- try of tilted non-hermitian dirac semimetals at quantum criticality, Phys. Rev. B111, 195126 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [57]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adia- batic changes, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A392, 45 (1984)

    work page 1984

  57. [58]

    J. C. Garrison and E. M. Wright, Complex geometrical phases for dissipative systems, Phys. Lett. A128, 177 (1988)

    work page 1988

  58. [59]

    Quantum Geometric Origin of the Intrinsic Nonlinear Hall Effect

    Y. Ulrich, J. Mitscherling, L. Classen, and A. P. Schny- der, Quantum geometric origin of the intrinsic nonlinear hall effect (2025), arXiv:2506.17386 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  59. [60]

    Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed

    S. Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed. (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2011)

    work page 2011

  60. [61]

    Aversa and J

    C. Aversa and J. E. Sipe, Nonlinear optical susceptibili- ties of semiconductors: Results with a length-gauge anal- ysis, Phys. Rev. B52, 14636 (1995)

    work page 1995

  61. [62]

    Morimoto and N

    T. Morimoto and N. Nagaosa, Topological nature of non- linear optical effects in solids, Phys. Rev. B94, 035117 (2016)

    work page 2016

  62. [63]

    Rostami and V

    H. Rostami and V. Juričić, Probing quantum critical- ity using nonlinear hall effect in a metallic dirac system, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013069 (2020)

    work page 2020

  63. [64]

    Morimoto and N

    T. Morimoto and N. Nagaosa, Topological nature of nonlinear optical effects in solids, Science Advances2, e1501524 (2016)

    work page 2016

  64. [65]

    I. V. Tokatly and G. Vignale, Lorentz shear modulus of a two-dimensional electron gas at high magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B76, 161305(R) (2007)

    work page 2007

  65. [66]

    Bradlyn, M

    B. Bradlyn, M. Goldstein, and N. Read, Kubo formulas for viscosity: Hall viscosity, spin density, and torsion, Physical Review B86, 245309 (2012)

    work page 2012

  66. [67]

    Müller, L

    M. Müller, L. Fritz, and S. Sachdev, Quantum-critical relativistic magnetotransport in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 78, 115406 (2008)

    work page 2008

  67. [68]

    Torre, A

    I. Torre, A. Tomadin, A. K. Geim, and M. Polini, Non- local transport and the hydrodynamic shear viscosity in graphene, Phys. Rev. B92, 165433 (2015)

    work page 2015

  68. [69]

    Eberlein, A

    A. Eberlein, A. A. Patel, and S. Sachdev, Transport in clean two-dimensional dirac systems: Hydrodynamic and ballistic regimes, Physical Review B95, 075127 (2017)

    work page 2017

  69. [70]

    J. M. Link, D. E. Sheehy, B. N. Narozhny, and J. Schmalian, Viscosity and hydrodynamic transport in graphene: Interaction effects and nonlocal response, Physical Review B98, 195103 (2018)

    work page 2018

  70. [71]

    J. M. Link, B. N. Narozhny, E. I. Kiselev, and J. Schmalian, Out-of-equilibrium hydrodynamic trans- port in dirac fluids, Physical Review Letters120, 196801 (2018)

    work page 2018

  71. [72]

    Copetti and K

    C. Copetti and K. Landsteiner, Viscosity in dirac fluids and holographic bounds, Physical Review B99, 195146 (2019)

    work page 2019

  72. [73]

    Moore, P

    M. Moore, P. Surówka, V. Juričić, and B. Roy, Shear viscosity as a probe of nodal topology, Phys. Rev. B101, 161111 (2020)

    work page 2020

  73. [74]

    Resta and S

    R. Resta and S. Sorella, Electron localization in the in- sulating state, Physical Review Letters82, 370 (1999)

    work page 1999

  74. [75]

    Souza, T

    I. Souza, T. Wilkens, and R. M. Martin, Polarization and localization in insulators: Generating function approach, Physical Review B62, 1666 (2000)

    work page 2000

  75. [76]

    Verma and R

    N. Verma and R. Queiroz, Instantaneous response and quantum geometry of insulators, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences of the United States of Amer- ica122, e2405837122 (2025)

    work page 2025

  76. [77]

    Resta, Nonadiabatic quantum geometry and optical conductivity, Physical Review B111, 205107 (2025)

    R. Resta, Nonadiabatic quantum geometry and optical conductivity, Physical Review B111, 205107 (2025)

    work page 2025

  77. [78]

    Zhang, C

    X. Zhang, C. Wu, M. Yan, N. Liu, Z. Wang, and G.Chen,Observationofcontinuumlandaumodesinnon- hermitian electric circuits, Nature Communications15, 1798 (2024)

    work page 2024

  78. [79]

    Zhu, X.-Q

    P. Zhu, X.-Q. Sun, T. L. Hughes, and G. Bahl, Higher rank chirality and non-hermitian skin effect in a topolec- trical circuit, Nature Communications14, 720 (2023)

    work page 2023

  79. [80]

    X. Xie, F. Ma, W. B. Rui,et al., Non-hermitian dirac cones with valley-dependent lifetimes, Nature Communi- cations16, 1627 (2025)

    work page 2025

  80. [81]

    L. Yu, H. Xue, R. Guo, E. A. Chan, Y. Y. Terh, C. Soci, B. Zhang, and Y. D. Chong, Dirac mass induced by op- tical gain and loss, Nature632, 63 (2024)

    work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.