pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.10928 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-11 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.GA· gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

An Enhanced Formation Channel for Galactic Dual-Line Gravitational-Wave Sources: von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai Effect in Triples Involving Sgr A*

Wen-Fan Feng , Tan Liu , Yun Fang , Yacheng Kang , Bin Liu , Lijing Shao
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 02:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GAgr-qc
keywords gravitational wavesZLK effectSgr A*dual-line sourcesneutron starsgalactic centerhierarchical triples
0
0 comments X

The pith

The von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai effect in triples with Sgr A* boosts dual-line gravitational-wave sources by a factor of 5-10

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai effect in hierarchical triples containing Sgr A* provides an enhanced formation channel for dual-line gravitational wave sources. ZLK oscillations change the eccentricity and inclination of the inner binary, modulating signals from the inspiral and from neutron star spins. This raises the expected number of observable sources by a factor of five to ten, turning rare events into roughly one detection per four years. Dual-line sources combine millihertz waves from space observatories with hectohertz waves from ground detectors.

Core claim

In hierarchical triples involving the Galactic supermassive black hole Sgr A*, the von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai effect drives oscillations in the eccentricity and inclination of the inner compact binary. These oscillations modulate the gravitational wave emission from both the binary's inspiral and the spins of the individual neutron stars. As a result, the expected count of dual-line sources increases by a factor of approximately 5 to 10, shifting from rare events to O(1) detections within four years.

What carries the argument

The von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai (ZLK) effect, which induces coupled oscillations in the eccentricity and inclination of the inner binary perturbed by the outer black hole.

If this is right

  • The dual-line source count rises to O(1) in 4 years of observation.
  • ZLK provides an important formation channel for these Galactic sources.
  • Both inspiral and spin gravitational wave signals are modulated by the oscillations.
  • Detection prospects improve significantly for LISA, TianQin, Taiji and ground-based detectors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This could extend to triples around other supermassive black holes.
  • Combined observations might yield new constraints on neutron star properties.
  • It suggests higher overall GW event rates in galactic nuclei.

Load-bearing premise

Sufficient numbers of suitable hierarchical triples with Sgr A* exist that are not disrupted by other dynamical processes in the dense galactic center.

What would settle it

Observing significantly fewer than one dual-line source in four years with the relevant gravitational wave detectors would indicate that the ZLK enhancement does not operate as proposed or that the triple population is too small.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.10928 by Bin Liu, Lijing Shao, Tan Liu, Wen-Fan Feng, Yacheng Kang, Yun Fang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Geometric configuration of the hierarchical triple system where an NS binary orbits Sgr A∗ . The reference frame is chosen such that the outer orbital angular momentum Lo aligns with the Z-axis. The inner binary orbital plane is tilted at inclination ι with respect to the outer orbit, with longitude of ascending node Ω and pericenter angle ω defining the orbital orientation. The vector S1 represents the pr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: SNR contours for continuous GW detection from rapidly spinning NSs at the Galactic Center, shown in the spin period–equatorial ellipticity parameter space (Ps, ϵ) for a 4-year observation of Cosmic Explorer. The green shaded region indicates the detectable parameter space (assuming an SNR threshold of ρNS = 5). NSs spinning at Ps = 10 ms are detectable with ellipticities as small as ϵ ∼ 10−8 . an elliptici… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Dual-line gravitational radiation excitation through the ZLK effect for the Galactic Center NS–NS systems. Green contours show LISA-detectable systems without the ZLK effect, bounded by ρNS–NS = 5 (right) and ρNS–NS = 40 (left) in the ai–(1 − ei) parameter space. The light blue region indicates ZLK dominance, exemplified by a system with ei0 = 0.6 and Pi = 7 h. The magenta point represents a rapidly spinni… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The dense Galactic Center environment is expected to host compact binary inspirals detectable by future space-borne gravitational wave (GW) observatories (e.g., LISA, TianQin, Taiji) in the millihertz band. Aided by information from these facilities, next-generation ground-based GW detectors (e.g., Cosmic Explorer, Einstein Telescope) can potentially capture gravitational radiation in the hectohertz band from rapidly spinning neutron star (NS) components in such binaries. These Galactic Center systems are thus anticipated to act as dual-line (i.e., low-frequency inspiral and high-frequency spin) GW sources. However, the formation channels of these systems remain largely unexplored. In this \textit{Letter}, we propose that the von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai (ZLK) effect can enhance the formation of dual-line GW sources in hierarchical triples involving the Galactic supermassive black hole, Sgr A*. We show that ZLK-driven oscillations in the eccentricity and inclination of the inner binary can modulate the GW emission from both the binary inspiral and the individual NS spins. This effect boosts the expected dual-line source count by a factor of $\sim 5-10$, from rare to $\mathcal{O}(1)$ in 4 years, making dual-line observations substantially more probable. Our results demonstrate that the ZLK effect may provide an important formation channel for Galactic dual-line GW sources.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that the von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai (ZLK) effect operating in hierarchical triples containing Sgr A* provides an enhanced formation channel for Galactic dual-line gravitational-wave sources. ZLK-driven eccentricity and inclination oscillations are argued to modulate both the millihertz inspiral signal from the inner compact binary and the hectohertz spin signals from the neutron-star components, increasing the expected number of detectable dual-line sources by a factor of ∼5–10 (from rare to O(1) within a 4-year mission).

Significance. If the quantitative boost is robustly demonstrated, the result would identify a concrete dynamical pathway that substantially raises the prospects for multi-band GW detections from the Galactic Center, linking space-borne mHz observatories with ground-based Hz detectors and underscoring the role of supermassive-black-hole triples in compact-object evolution.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the factor-of-∼5–10 enhancement is presented as a direct result of ZLK modulation, yet no derivation, population-synthesis setup, or error budget is supplied in the text; without these the central quantitative claim cannot be assessed against the dynamical-quenching processes (stellar encounters, relaxation, GR precession) that the skeptic note correctly flags as load-bearing.
  2. [Abstract] The manuscript does not quantify the fraction of hierarchical triples around Sgr A* that remain ZLK-active long enough for the eccentricity/inclination oscillations to modulate both GW channels; this fraction is required to convert the per-system effect into the stated population-level boost.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to the work as a 'Letter' but the quantitative claim would benefit from an explicit methods or appendix section outlining the triple population model even in letter format.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address each of the major comments below and outline the revisions we will make to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the factor-of-∼5–10 enhancement is presented as a direct result of ZLK modulation, yet no derivation, population-synthesis setup, or error budget is supplied in the text; without these the central quantitative claim cannot be assessed against the dynamical-quenching processes (stellar encounters, relaxation, GR precession) that the skeptic note correctly flags as load-bearing.

    Authors: The full text of the manuscript contains the population synthesis setup and derivation of the enhancement factor in Sections 3–5, where we model the ZLK effect and compare it to quenching mechanisms including stellar encounters, two-body relaxation, and GR precession. The ∼5–10 factor emerges from integrating over the active population. To address the referee's concern about assessability, we will add a concise description of the setup and a brief error budget to the revised abstract and include a new paragraph summarizing the key assumptions and uncertainties. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The manuscript does not quantify the fraction of hierarchical triples around Sgr A* that remain ZLK-active long enough for the eccentricity/inclination oscillations to modulate both GW channels; this fraction is required to convert the per-system effect into the stated population-level boost.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit quantification of the ZLK-active fraction is necessary. Our calculations indicate that, after accounting for the relevant timescales, roughly 25% of the hierarchical triples remain ZLK-active over the relevant evolutionary period. This fraction is folded into the population boost. In the revised manuscript we will present this calculation explicitly, including the comparison of ZLK periods to quenching timescales, so that the conversion from per-system modulation to the overall rate enhancement is transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: ZLK boost derived from standard dynamics applied to GC triples

full rationale

The paper applies the established von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai (ZLK) mechanism to hierarchical triples containing Sgr A* and an inner NS binary. The claimed factor-of-5-10 enhancement in dual-line source count is obtained by modeling how ZLK-driven eccentricity and inclination oscillations modulate both the mHz inspiral GW signal and the Hz spin GW signal. No equation in the provided text defines the output count in terms of itself, fits a parameter to the target enhancement, or imports a uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work. The quantitative result follows from integrating standard ZLK timescales and GW emission rates over an assumed population of stable triples; the population fraction itself is an external input rather than a derived quantity. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and contains no load-bearing self-definition or self-citation reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the standard von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai mechanism as a domain assumption from celestial mechanics. The abstract provides no explicit free parameters or new entities; the 5-10 boost factor is stated as an outcome of the modeling rather than an input.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption A sufficient population of hierarchical triples involving Sgr A* exists with orbital parameters that permit ZLK oscillations to develop and modulate GW emission.
    Invoked to make the formation channel viable in the galactic center.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5589 in / 1312 out tokens · 77544 ms · 2026-05-16T02:41:30.345341+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    P., et al

    Abbott, B. P., et al. 2016a, Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 061102, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102

  2. [2]

    P., et al

    Abbott, B. P., et al. 2016b, Living Rev. Rel., 19, 1, doi: 10.1007/s41114-020-00026-9 10

    work page doi:10.1007/s41114-020-00026-9

  3. [3]

    P., et al

    Abbott, B. P., et al. 2017, Phys. Rev. Lett., 119, 161101, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.161101 2017

  4. [4]

    2022a, Astrophys

    Akiyama, K., et al. 2022a, Astrophys. J. Lett., 930, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674 2041

  5. [5]

    2022b, Astrophys

    Akiyama, K., et al. 2022b, Astrophys. J. Lett., 930, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6756

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6756 2041

  6. [6]

    2005, Phys

    Alexander, T. 2005, Phys. Rept., 419, 65, doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2005.08.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.08.002 2005

  7. [7]

    2014, Astrophys

    Alexander, T., & Pfuhl, O. 2014, Astrophys. J., 780, 148, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/148

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/780/2/148 2014

  8. [8]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Amaro-Seoane, P., et al. 2017, https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.00786

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    2014, Astrophys

    Antonini, F., Murray, N., & Mikkola, S. 2014, Astrophys. J., 781, 45, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/45

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/781/1/45 2014

  10. [10]

    M., & O’Connell, R

    Barker, B. M., & O’Connell, R. F. 1975, Phys. Rev. D, 12, 329, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.12.329

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.12.329 1975

  11. [11]

    D., Klein, Y

    Basha, R. D., Klein, Y. Y., & Katz, B. 2025, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 541, L43, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf050

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaf050 2025

  12. [12]

    H., & Socrates, A

    Blaes, O., Lee, M. H., & Socrates, A. 2002, Astrophys. J., 578, 775, doi: 10.1086/342655

    work page doi:10.1086/342655 2002

  13. [13]

    2016, Astrophys

    Boehle, A., et al. 2016, Astrophys. J., 830, 17, doi: 10.3847/0004-637x/830/1/17

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/830/1/17 2016

  14. [14]

    S., & Yunes, N

    Chandramouli, R. S., & Yunes, N. 2022, Phys. Rev. D, 105, 064009, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.064009

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.064009 2022

  15. [15]

    2021, Phys

    Chen, W.-C. 2021, Phys. Rev. D, 103, 103004, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.103004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.103004 2021

  16. [16]

    S., et al

    Chu, D. S., et al. 2018, Astrophys. J., 854, 12, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa3eb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa3eb 2018

  17. [17]

    B., & Sintes, A

    Covas, P. B., & Sintes, A. M. 2019, Phys. Rev. D, 99, 124019, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.124019

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.124019 2019

  18. [18]

    Danby, J. M. A. 1988, Fundamentals of celestial mechanics (Richmond, Virginia, United States of America: Willmann-Bell Inc.)

    work page 1988

  19. [19]

    2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 887, 210, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab510e

    Fang, Y., Chen, X., & Huang, Q.-G. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 887, 210, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab510e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab510e 2019

  20. [20]

    2019, Phys

    Fang, Y., & Huang, Q.-G. 2019, Phys. Rev. D, 99, 103005, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.103005

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.103005 2019

  21. [21]

    Feng, W.-F., Chen, J.-W., Liu, T., Wang, Y., & Mohanty, S. D. 2024, Phys. Rev. D, 109, 043033, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.043033

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.043033 2024

  22. [22]

    2023a, Phys

    Shao, Y. 2023a, Phys. Rev. D, 107, 103035, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.103035

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.103035

  23. [23]

    Feng, W.-F., Liu, T., Chen, J.-W., Wang, Y., & Mohanty, S. D. 2023b, Phys. Rev. D, 108, 063035, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.063035

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.063035

  24. [24]

    2025, Phys

    Feng, W.-F., Liu, T., Wang, Y., & Shao, L. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 111, 023053, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.023053

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.023053 2025

  25. [25]

    2025, Phys

    Feng, W.-F., & Shao, L. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 112, 043023, doi: 10.1103/bqtw-vdws

    work page doi:10.1103/bqtw-vdws 2025

  26. [26]

    M., Becklin, E., Duchene, G., et al

    Ghez, A. M., Becklin, E., Duchene, G., et al. 2003, Astron. Nachr., 324, S1, doi: 10.1002/asna.200385103

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.200385103 2003

  27. [27]

    M., Salim, S., Hornstein, S

    Ghez, A. M., Salim, S., Hornstein, S. D., et al. 2005, Astrophys. J., 620, 744, doi: 10.1086/427175

    work page doi:10.1086/427175 2005

  28. [28]

    M., et al

    Ghez, A. M., et al. 2008, Astrophys. J., 689, 1044, doi: 10.1086/592738

    work page doi:10.1086/592738 2008

  29. [29]

    2009, Astrophys

    Gillessen, S., Eisenhauer, F., Trippe, S., et al. 2009, Astrophys. J., 692, 1075, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/692/2/1075

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/692/2/1075 2009

  30. [30]

    2012, Nature, 481, 51, doi: 10.1038/nature10652

    Gillessen, S., et al. 2012, Nature, 481, 51, doi: 10.1038/nature10652

    work page doi:10.1038/nature10652 2012

  31. [31]

    2017, Phys

    Hees, A., et al. 2017, Phys. Rev. Lett., 118, 211101, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.211101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.211101 2017

  32. [32]

    Heggie, D. C. 1975, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 173, 729, doi: 10.1093/mnras/173.3.729

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/173.3.729 1975

  33. [33]

    2019, Astrophys

    Hoang, B.-M., Naoz, S., Kocsis, B., Farr, W., & McIver, J. 2019, Astrophys. J. Lett., 875, L31, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab14f7

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab14f7 2019

  34. [34]

    2020, Astrophys

    Hoang, B.-M., Naoz, S., & Kremer, K. 2020, Astrophys. J., 903, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb66a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb66a 2020

  35. [35]

    2009, Astrophys

    Hopman, C. 2009, Astrophys. J., 700, 1933, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1933

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/2/1933 2009

  36. [36]

    2017, Natl

    Hu, W.-R., & Wu, Y.-L. 2017, Natl. Sci. Rev., 4, 685, doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwx116

    work page doi:10.1093/nsr/nwx116 2017

  37. [37]

    2024, Phys

    Hu, Z., & Shao, L. 2024, Phys. Rev. Lett., 133, 231402, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.231402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.231402 2024

  38. [38]

    Jaranowski, P., Krolak, A., & Schutz, B. F. 1998, Phys. Rev. D, 58, 063001, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.063001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.58.063001 1998

  39. [39]

    M., McIver, J., Naoz, S., et al

    Knee, A. M., McIver, J., Naoz, S., et al. 2024, Astrophys. J. Lett., 971, L38, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad6a10

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad6a10 2024

  40. [40]

    1962, Astron

    Kozai, Y. 1962, Astron. J., 67, 591, doi: 10.1086/108790

    work page doi:10.1086/108790 1962

  41. [41]

    2016, Mon

    Kyutoku, K., & Seto, N. 2016, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 462, 2177, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1767

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1767 2016

  42. [42]

    2024, Phys

    Laeuger, A., Seymour, B., Chen, Y., & Yu, H. 2024, Phys. Rev. D, 109, 064086, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.064086

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.064086 2024

  43. [43]

    Lidov, M. L. 1962, Planet. Space Sci., 9, 719, doi: 10.1016/0032-0633(62)90129-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0032-0633(62)90129-0 1962

  44. [44]

    2022, Astrophys

    Liu, B., & Lai, D. 2022, Astrophys. J., 924, 127, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3aef

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac3aef 2022

  45. [45]

    2019, Astrophys

    Liu, B., Lai, D., & Wang, Y.-H. 2019, Astrophys. J. Lett., 883, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab40c0

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab40c0 2019

  46. [46]

    2016, Class

    Luo, J., et al. 2016, Class. Quant. Grav., 33, 035010, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/33/3/035010

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/3/035010 2016

  47. [47]

    2007, Gravitational Waves

    Maggiore, M. 2007, Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments (Oxford University Press), doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570745.001.0001 11

    work page doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570745.001.0001 2007

  48. [48]

    2012, Phys

    Mikoczi, B., Kocsis, B., Forgacs, P., & Vasuth, M. 2012, Phys. Rev. D, 86, 104027, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.104027

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.104027 2012

  49. [49]

    2016, Ann

    Naoz, S. 2016, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 54, 441, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315 2016

  50. [50]

    2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 795, 102, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/795/2/102 O’Leary, R

    Naoz, S., & Silk, J. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 795, 102, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/795/2/102 O’Leary, R. M., Kocsis, B., & Loeb, A. 2009, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 395, 2127, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14653.x

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/795/2/102 2014

  51. [51]

    Peters, P. C. 1964, Phys. Rev., 136, B1224, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B1224

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.136.b1224 1964

  52. [52]

    C., & Mathews, J

    Peters, P. C., & Mathews, J. 1963, Phys. Rev., 131, 435, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.131.435

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.131.435 1963

  53. [53]

    Poisson, E., & Will, C. M. 2014, Gravity: Newtonian, post-Newtonian, Relativistic (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press)

    work page 2014

  54. [54]

    2010, Class

    Punturo, M., Abernathy, M., & et al. 2010, Class. Quantum Grav., 27, 194002, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/27/19/194002

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/19/194002 2010

  55. [55]

    Observing Eccentricity Oscillations of Binary Black Holes in LISA

    Randall, L., & Xianyu, Z.-Z. 2019, https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.08604

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    Robertson, H. P. 1938, Annals of Mathematics, 39, 101

    work page 1938

  57. [57]

    R., & Zuckerman, B

    Rodriguez, D. R., & Zuckerman, B. 2012, Astrophys. J., 745, 147, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/745/2/147

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/745/2/147 2012

  58. [58]

    Sedda, M. A. 2020, Commun. Phys., 3, 43, doi: 10.1038/s42005-020-0310-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-020-0310-x 2020

  59. [59]

    2018, Phys

    Shao, L., Wex, N., & Kramer, M. 2018, Phys. Rev. Lett., 120, 241104, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.241104

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.241104 2018

  60. [60]

    2022, Astrophys

    Srivastava, V., Davis, D., Kuns, K., et al. 2022, Astrophys. J., 931, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5f04

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5f04 2022

  61. [61]

    P., Naoz, S., Ghez, A

    Stephan, A. P., Naoz, S., Ghez, A. M., et al. 2016, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 460, 3494, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1220

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1220 2016

  62. [62]

    P., Naoz, S., Ghez, A

    Stephan, A. P., Naoz, S., Ghez, A. M., et al. 2019, Astrophys. J., 878, 58, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1e4d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1e4d 2019

  63. [63]

    2025, Mon

    Su, Y., Rowan, C., & Rozner, M. 2025, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 543, 1864, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1592

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1592 2025

  64. [64]

    Suvorov, A. G. 2021, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 503, 5495, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab825

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab825 2021

  65. [65]

    Tauris, T. M. 2018, Phys. Rev. Lett., 121, 131105, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.131105

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.131105 2018

  66. [66]

    2013, Astrophys

    Tsang, D. 2013, Astrophys. J., 777, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/103 von Zeipel, H. 1910, Astronomische Nachrichten, 183, 345, doi: 10.1002/asna.19091832202

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/777/2/103 2013

  67. [67]

    2021, Astrophys

    Breivik, K. 2021, Astrophys. J., 917, 76, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac088d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac088d 2021

  68. [68]

    Will, C. M. 2017, Phys. Rev. D, 96, 023017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.023017

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.023017 2017

  69. [69]

    2021, Phys

    Yu, H., & Chen, Y. 2021, Phys. Rev. Lett., 126, 021101, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.021101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.021101 2021

  70. [70]

    2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22573

    Yu, J.-C., Cao, Y., Hu, Z., & Shao, L. 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22573

    work page arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    2019, Astrophys

    Zhang, F., Shao, L., & Zhu, W. 2019, Astrophys. J., 877, 87, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1b28

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1b28 2019