Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 135 references

Random-plaquette disorder shifts one Z2 gauge-Higgs transition to a new universality class, while the twin Ising* transition keeps its pure critical behavior.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 22:50 UTC pith:MAISLHGV

load-bearing objection Solid random-plaquette MC results, but the abstract overstates the random-site scenario that the body itself labels a hypothesis. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2602.15418 v2 pith:MAISLHGV submitted 2026-02-17 cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.stat-mechhep-lat

Effects of quenched disorder in three-dimensional lattice {mathbb Z}₂ gauge Higgs models

Claudio Bonati , Ettore Vicari This is my paper
classification cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.stat-mechhep-lat MSC 82B2082B2782B80
keywords quenched disorderZ2 gauge-Higgs modeltopological phase transitionuniversality classrandom-plaquette disorderrandom-site dilutionfinite-size scalingcritical exponents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks whether quenched impurities change the phase diagram and critical behavior of the three-dimensional Z2 gauge-Higgs model, the simplest lattice gauge theory coupled to matter. For weak disorder, the two continuous transition lines survive, but they respond differently depending on which type of impurity is introduced. Random-plaquette disorder moves the topological Z2 transition into a new universality class (the random-plaquette Z2 gauge class, ν≈0.82) while leaving the Ising* line untouched (ν≈0.63). Random-site dilution is argued to do the opposite: it should destabilize the Ising* line into the randomly-dilute Ising* class (ν≈0.68) while the topological line stays Ising-like (ν≈0.63). The result matters because impurity-driven changes of universality determine which phase boundaries survive in real materials and quantum-memory implementations.

Core claim

The paper establishes a type-of-disorder asymmetry in the 3D Z2 gauge-Higgs model. With random-plaquette disorder, the topological transition line (the one ending at J=0) becomes a new random-plaquette Z2 gauge (RPZ2G) transition with length-scale exponent ν≈0.82, while the Ising* line (the one ending at K→∞) keeps its pure Ising exponent ν≈0.63. The explanation offered is that along the Ising* line the plaquette contribution to the energy is not the singular part, so plaquette disorder is irrelevant. With random-site dilution the paper argues the roles flip: dilution couples to the spin term, so the Ising* line should become randomly-dilute Ising* (RDI*) with ν≈0.68, while the topological l

What carries the argument

The two disorder-averaged Hamiltonians—one with random ±1 plaquette weights, one with random site vacancies—are the models under study. The load-bearing tool is finite-size scaling of the disorder-averaged energy cumulants B_k (derivatives of the free energy with respect to temperature), which provide a local gauge-invariant handle on transitions that lack a local order parameter. The scaling law B_k ≈ L^{k/ν-3} B_k(X) with X=(J-J_c)L^{1/ν} lets the authors read off ν from data collapse.

Load-bearing premise

The random-site half of the abstract rests on an untested assumption: site dilution, which exactly leaves the J=0 topological transition in the pure Ising class, continues to leave it there for all small J; the paper states this expectation without simulation.

What would settle it

Run the finite-size scaling analysis the paper used for the plaquette case on the site-diluted model at a small nonzero J (for example J=0.05) along the topological transition; if the extracted length-scale exponent ν deviates from 0.63, the claimed random-site stability fails.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Along the topological transition, weak plaquette disorder changes the critical exponent from ν≈0.63 to ν≈0.82, placing the transition in a new RPZ2G universality class rather than the pure Ising class.
  • The Ising* line with plaquette disorder keeps ν≈0.63, showing that plaquette impurities are irrelevant there despite the positive specific-heat exponent.
  • Site dilution is predicted to shift the Ising* line to the RDI* class with ν≈0.68, while the topological line retains ν≈0.63 at J=0 and for small J.
  • Sufficiently strong disorder destroys at least one of the continuous transition lines (for plaquette disorder, q≈0.03 and above), leaving open whether a single phase or a reentrant phase appears.
  • The results identify which universality class controls the topological phase boundary of the gauge-Higgs model in the presence of impurities, a quantity relevant for toric-code quantum memories.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: combining both disorder types, as the paper mentions at the end, should make neither transition keep the pure Ising class—one line would become RPZ2G and the other RDI*. This is a prediction of the paper's logic, not a simulated result.
  • Inference: because random-plaquette disorder models local errors in a toric-code quantum memory, the new ν≈0.82 governs how the memory's error threshold scales with system size; the paper does not draw this quantitative consequence.
  • Inference: the site-dilution scenario could be tested with the same cumulant analysis at a small nonzero J; a measurement of ν on the topological line at, say, J=0.05 would confirm or refute the continuity assumption.
  • Inference: the strong-disorder limit leaves an unresolved either-or—disappearance of the transition lines versus a reentrant phase—which the paper explicitly flags as an open question.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the 3D lattice Z2 gauge-Higgs model with quenched disorder, considering two disorder types: random-plaquette variables (Eq. 7) and random-site dilution (Eq. 10). For random-plaquette disorder, the authors report Monte Carlo finite-size scaling analyses of energy cumulants along two transition lines: at J=0.1, q=0.015 they find scaling consistent with the RPZ2G universality class with ν=ν_rp≈0.82, and at K=1, q=0.01 and 0.015 they find Ising* behavior with ν≈0.63. They also report that no transition is observed for q=0.05 at K=1. For random-site disorder, no Monte Carlo data are presented; the paper hypothesizes that the Ising* line becomes RDI* with ν≈0.68 while the topological line remains Ising-like. The abstract nevertheless states the random-site scenario as a result. The central contribution is the random-plaquette analysis, especially the evidence that plaquette disorder leaves the Ising* line unchanged.

Significance. If the claims are correct, the paper establishes a nontrivial, disorder-type-dependent pattern of relevance/irrelevance: plaquette disorder changes the topological Z2 gauge transition to the RPZ2G class, while site dilution is argued to change the Ising* transition to RDI*. This would be a useful addition to the understanding of disordered gauge theories and would sharpen the domain of validity of Harris-type reasoning. The energy-cumulant FSS methodology is appropriate for transitions without local order parameters, and the manuscript's unbiased fits on the Ising* line (Eqs. 21 and 23) are a genuine strength. The random-plaquette topological-line analysis, however, depends on fixing ν to the value from the authors' prior work, and the random-site scenario is untested. Confidence in the central claim is therefore conditional on additional fits and on either simulations or a substantially softened abstract.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Sec. VI] The abstract presents the random-site scenario as an outcome: 'The random-site disorder leads to a substantially different scenario: it destabilizes the Ising^× critical behaviors ... while the critical behaviors along the ... topological transition line remains stable.' In the body, however, Sec. VI contains no Monte Carlo data. The RDI^× claim is introduced only as 'the naturally hypothesis' and the stability of the topological line is an expectation ('we do not expect that the critical behavior can change for finite (sufficiently small) values of J'). The argument that dilution couples only to the spin term and, by duality, the link coupling is irrelevant is plausible but does not verify the finite-J statement; Harris's criterion (α_I≈0.11) makes energy-like disorder a priori relevant, and the reason it would fail here relies on the singular energy being plaquette-dominated. This is p
  2. [Sec. V, Eq. (17), Fig. 2] The RPZ2G classification of the topological transition at J=0.1, q=0.015 is obtained by fixing ν=ν_rp=0.82 from the authors' previous work [53] and optimizing only K_c; no unbiased ν fit is reported for this line. The data collapse in Fig. 2 is therefore a self-consistency check against the prior, not an independent determination. The comparison with the scaling function of the J=0 random-plaquette Z2 gauge model from [53] is likewise circular because that model was used to define the class being tested. Since the abstract's first central claim is that the topological line belongs to a different RPZ2G class, an unbiased FSS fit of ν (or a clear demonstration of how the quality of collapse varies with ν) is needed. The unbiased fits reported for the Ising^× line (Eqs. (21),(23)) show the authors can do this; the absence here is a gap.
  3. [Sec. VII; Abstract] The paper states as a general result that 'for sufficiently weak disorder, the phase diagram remains similar' for both types of disorder. For random-plaquette disorder the evidence consists of one point on the topological line (J=0.1, q=0.015) and two points on the Ising^× line (K=1, q=0.01, 0.015); for random-site disorder there are no simulations. The conclusion that the two-phase structure survives for weak site disorder is thus an extrapolation. This should be either qualified in the abstract and conclusions or supported by simulations such as a finite-size scaling scan at small finite J along the site-disordered topological line.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. VI] The phrase 'the naturally hypothesis' should read 'the natural hypothesis'.
  2. [Sec. V] The value ν_rp=0.82(2) is taken from Ref. [53], which appears to be an unpublished preprint. Since this exponent is a load-bearing input for the present paper's main classification, the manuscript should include a brief description of the fit that produced it, or at least a clear reference to the relevant equation in [53], so that the reader can assess systematic uncertainties.
  3. [Sec. IV] For reproducibility, the simulation-statistics reporting is somewhat sparse: the number of disorder samples and the number of independent measurements are given for the J=0.1 run and stated as 'roughly the same' for later runs, but the precise statistics for the q=0.01 and q=0.015 Ising^× runs should be listed explicitly.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

The RPZ2G topological-line classification inherits ν_rp from the authors' own prior work and validates against that same work; the abstract overstates the untested random-site scenario.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. V, Fig. 2 caption and surrounding text; abstract's ν=ν_rp≈0.82 claim]
    "The critical exponent νrp = 0.82 of the RPZ2G universality class has been used, together with the optimal estimate Kc = 0.894 of the critical point. ... In Fig. 2 we also report, for comparison, data for the third cumulant in the RPZ2G model obtained in Ref. [53]."

    The value ν_rp=0.82(2) defining the RPZ2G universality class is taken from the authors' own arXiv preprint [53]; it is not fitted or independently determined for the J=0.1 line. The FSS collapse uses that assumed ν as an input and is then presented as confirmation that the topological line is RPZ2G, while the abstract states ν=ν_rp≈0.82 as a result. Comparing with the same [53] scaling function makes this a self-consistency check rather than an independent determination: if the prior exponent were wrong, this analysis would at most show a poor collapse, not produce a new value. The topological-line claim therefore relies on a load-bearing self-citation, although the new data collapse does add some independent consistency evidence.

full rationale

The random-plaquette Ising* analysis is self-contained: at K=1, q=0.01 and q=0.015 the paper uses both biased fits with ν_I and ω_I and unbiased fits giving ν=0.63(1) and 0.625(4), so that central result does not reduce to its inputs. The topological-line RPZ2G classification, by contrast, is not independently derived here: ν_rp=0.82 is imported from the authors' own [53], the collapse at J=0.1 is made with that fixed value, and the scaling function is compared with the same preprint's data. That is a partial self-citation chain rather than a full by-construction circularity. Separately, the abstract presents the random-site scenario as a result, but Sec. VI contains no Monte Carlo data for finite J: it offers only a 'naturally hypothesis' for RDI* and 'we do not expect that the critical behavior can change' for the topological line. This is an overstatement/evidence gap, not a circular reduction, but it should be weighed in assessing the paper's overall claims. Weighing these, the paper has one load-bearing self-citation for the RPZ2G exponent while retaining independent content in the Ising* line, so the circularity score is 4.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new free parameters are introduced: critical couplings are measured results, and exponents are taken from literature or estimated as results. The central claims rest on standard FSS/universality assumptions, plus two domain-specific inputs: the RPZ2G exponent from the authors' prior work, and the RDI exponent for the untested random-site prediction.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Harris criterion: bond/site disorder is relevant when the pure specific-heat exponent α>0 (here α_I≈0.11).
    Used in Sec. V to argue plaquette disorder should change the Z2 gauge topological line, and in Sec. VI for the Ising* line.
  • domain assumption FSS scaling form Eq. (17) with analytic background b_k and leading correction exponent ω.
    Sec. IV, Eq. (17); all critical coupling and exponent estimates rely on this form.
  • domain assumption The RPZ2G universality class with ν_rp=0.82(2) as established in the authors' prior paper [53].
    Sec. V uses this exponent as input for biased fits and scaling-function comparison; not independently established in this paper.
  • domain assumption The 3D RDI universality class with ν_rdi=0.683(2) applies to the randomly diluted Ising* transition.
    Sec. VI prediction; no MC verification in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper For random-site disorder, the J=0 limit is unchanged and the topological line remains Ising-like for finite small J.
    Sec. VI states 'we do not expect that the critical behavior can change for finite (sufficiently small) values of J'—this is an unverified assumption central to the random-site scenario.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 19684 in / 11597 out tokens · 112919 ms · 2026-08-02T22:50:43.074716+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effects of quenched disorder in three-dimensional lattice ${\mathbb Z}_2$ gauge Higgs models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MAISLHGV

@misc{pith2026260215418,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effects of quenched disorder in three-dimensional lattice $\mathbb Z_2$ gauge Higgs models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MAISLHGV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.15418}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We study the effects of uncorrelated quenched disorder to the phase diagram and continuous transitions of three-dimensional lattice ${\mathbb Z}_2$ gauge Higgs models. For this purpose, we consider two types of quenched disorder, associated with the sites and plaquettes of the cubic lattice. In both cases, for sufficiently weak disorder, the phase diagram remains similar to that of the pure system, showing two different phases (one of them being a topologically ordered phase), separated by two different continuous transition lines. However, the quenched disorder changes the universality classes of the critical behaviors along some of the transition lines. The random-plaquette disorder turns out to be relevant along the topological ${\mathbb Z}_2$ gauge transition line, so the critical behaviors belong to the different random-plaquette $\mathbb{Z}_2$ gauge (RP${\mathbb Z}_2$G) universality class with length-scale exponent $\nu=\nu_{\rm rp}\approx 0.82$; on the other hand, it turns out to be irrelevant along the other Ising$^\times$ transition line (a variant of the Ising transitions with a gauge-dependent order parameter), leaving unchanged its asymptotic critical behaviors with $\nu=\nu_{\cal I}\approx 0.63$. The random-site disorder leads to a substantially different scenario: it destabilizes the Ising$^\times$ critical behaviors of the pure model, changing them into those of the randomly-dilute Ising$^{\times}$ (RDI$^{\times}$) universality class with $\nu=\nu_{\rm rdi}\approx 0.68$, while the critical behaviors along the other ${\mathbb Z}_2$ gauge topological transition line remains stable, with $\nu=\nu_{\cal I}\approx 0.63$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.15418 by Claudio Bonati, Ettore Vicari.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Sketch of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Some results for the lattice [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Scaling of the third and of the fourth cumulants for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Scaling of the third and of the fourth order cumu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Third and the fourth order cumulants data for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

135 extracted references · 8 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Parisi, Nobel Lecture: Multiple equilibria, arXiv:2304.00580

    G. Parisi, Nobel Lecture: Multiple equilibria, arXiv:2304.00580

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Nishimori,Statistical Physics of Spin Glasses and Information Processing: An Introduction, Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford, 2001

    H. Nishimori,Statistical Physics of Spin Glasses and Information Processing: An Introduction, Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford, 2001

    2001

  3. [3]

    Ma,Modern theory of critical phenomena, Rout- ledge Editor (New York, 2001)

    S.-k. Ma,Modern theory of critical phenomena, Rout- ledge Editor (New York, 2001)

    2001

  4. [4]

    Cardy,Scaling and renormalization in statistical physics(Cambridge University Press, 1996)

    J. Cardy,Scaling and renormalization in statistical physics(Cambridge University Press, 1996)

    1996

  5. [5]

    Vojta, Disorder in quantum many-body systems, Annu

    T. Vojta, Disorder in quantum many-body systems, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.10, 233 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    A. B. Harris, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics Effect of random defects on the critical behaviour of Ising models, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.7, 1671 (1974)

    1974

  7. [7]

    A. B. Harris and T.C. Lubensky, Renormalization- Group Approach to the Critical Behavior of Random- Spin Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.33, 1540 (1974)

    1974

  8. [8]

    D. E. Khmelnitskii, Second-order phase transition in inhomogeneous bodies, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.68, 1960 (1975) [Sov. Phys. JETP41, 981 (1976)]

    1960

  9. [9]

    S. F. Edwards and P. W. Anderson, Theory of spin glasses, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys.5, 965 (1975)

    1975

  10. [10]

    Grinstein and A

    G. Grinstein and A. Luther, Application of the renor- malization group to phase transitions in disordered sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B13, 1329 (1976)

    1976

  11. [11]

    Nishimori, Internal Energy, Specific Heat and Cor- relation Function of the Bond-Random Ising Model , Prog

    H. Nishimori, Internal Energy, Specific Heat and Cor- relation Function of the Bond-Random Ising Model , Prog. Theor. Phys.66, 1169 (1981)

    1981

  12. [12]

    Le Doussal and A

    P. Le Doussal and A. B. Harris, Location of the Ising Spin-Glass multicritical point on Nishimori’s line, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 625 (1988)

    1988

  13. [13]

    Palassini and S

    M. Palassini and S. Caracciolo, Universal Finite-Size Scaling Functions in the 3D Ising Spin Glass, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 5128 (1999)

    1999

  14. [14]

    A. K. Hartmann, Ground-state behavior of the three- dimensional±Jrandom-bond Ising model, Phys. Rev. B59, 3617 (1999)

    1999

  15. [15]

    Pelissetto and E

    A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Randomly dilute spin mod- els: a six-loop field-theoretic study, Phys Rev. B62, 6393 (2000)

    2000

  16. [16]

    H. G. Ballesteros, A. Cruz, L. A. Fern´ andez, V. Mart ´ ın- Mayor, J. Pech, J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, A. Taranc´ on, P. T´ ellez, C. L. Ullod, and C. Ungil, Critical behav- ior of the three-dimensional Ising spin glass, Phys. Rev. B62, 14237 (2000)

    2000

  17. [17]

    Pelissetto and E

    A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Critical phenomena and renormalization group theory, Phys. Rep.368, 549 (2002)

    2002

  18. [18]

    Krzakala and O

    F. Krzakala and O. C. Martin, Absence of an Equilib- rium Ferromagnetic Spin-Glass Phase in Three Dimen- sions, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 267202 (2002)

    2002

  19. [19]

    Kawashima and H

    N. Kawashima and H. Rieger, inFrustrated Spin Sys- tems, edited by H.T. Diep (World Scientific, Singapore, 2004); cond-mat/0312432

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  20. [20]

    Granato, Critical behavior and driven Monte Carlo dynamics of the XY spin glass in the phase representa- tion, Phys

    E. Granato, Critical behavior and driven Monte Carlo dynamics of the XY spin glass in the phase representa- tion, Phys. Rev. B69, 144203 (2004)

    2004

  21. [21]

    Matsumoto, K

    M. Matsumoto, K. Hukushima, and H. Takayama, Dynamical Critical Phenomena in three-dimensional Heisenberg Spin Glasses, Phys. Rev. B66, 104404 (2002)

    2002

  22. [22]

    Picco and F

    M. Picco and F. Ritort, Dynamical AC study of the critical behavior in Heisenberg spin glasses Phys. Rev. B71, 100406 (2005)

    2005

  23. [23]

    H. G. Katzgraber, M. K¨ orner, and A. P. Young, Univer- sality in three-dimensional Ising spin glasses: A Monte Carlo study, Phys. Rev. B73, 224432 (2006)

    2006

  24. [24]

    J¨ org, Critical behavior of the three-dimensional bond-diluted Ising spin glass: Finite-size scaling func- tions and universality, Phys

    T. J¨ org, Critical behavior of the three-dimensional bond-diluted Ising spin glass: Finite-size scaling func- tions and universality, Phys. Rev. B73, 224431 (2006)

    2006

  25. [25]

    Picco, A

    M. Picco, A. Honecker, and P. Pujol, Strong disorder fixed points in the two-dimensional random-bond Ising model, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2006) P09006

    2006

  26. [26]

    Hasenbusch, F

    M. Hasenbusch, F. Parisen Toldin, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, The critical behavior of the 3D±JIsing model at the ferromagnetic transition line, Phys. Rev. B76, 094402 (2007)

    2007

  27. [27]

    Hasenbusch, F

    M. Hasenbusch, F. Parisen Toldin, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Universality class of 3D site-diluted and bond- diluted Ising systems, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2007) P02016

    2007

  28. [28]

    L. W. Lee and A. P. Young, Large-scale Monte Carlo simulations of the isotropic three-dimensional Heisen- berg spin glass, Phys. Rev. B76, 024405 (2007)

    2007

  29. [29]

    Hasenbusch, F

    M. Hasenbusch, F. Parisen Toldin, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Magnetic-glassy multicritical behavior of 3D±J Ising model, Phys. Rev. B76, 184202 (2007)

    2007

  30. [30]

    Hasenbusch, A

    M. Hasenbusch, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Critical behavior of three-dimensional Ising spin glass models, Phys. Rev. B78, 214205 (2008); The critical behavior of 3D Ising spin glass models: universality and scaling corrections, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. L02001 (2008)

    2008

  31. [31]

    Hasenbusch, F

    M. Hasenbusch, F. Parisen Toldin, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Multicritical Nishimori point in the phase dia- gram of the±JIsing model on the square lattice, Phys. Rev. E77, 051115 (2008)

    2008

  32. [32]

    Parisen Toldin, A

    F. Parisen Toldin, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Strong- disorder paramagnetic-ferromagnetic fixed point in the square-lattice±JIsing model, Journal of Stat. Phys. 135, 1039 (2009); Universality of the glassy transitions in the two-dimensional±JIsing model, Phys. Rev. E 82, 021106 (2010)

    2009

  33. [33]

    D. X. Viet and H. Kawamura, Numerical evidence of the spin-chirality decoupling in the three-dimensional Heisenberg spin glass, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 027202 (2009); Monte Carlo studies of the chiral and spin or- derings of the three-dimensional Heisenberg spin glass, Phys. Rev. B80, 064418 (2009)

    2009

  34. [34]

    L. A. Fernandez, V. Martin-Mayor, S. Perez-Gaviro, A. Tarancon, and A. P. Young, Phase transition in the three dimensional Heisenberg spin glass: Finite-size scaling analysis, Phys. Rev. B80, 024422 (2009)

    2009

  35. [35]

    Alba and E

    V. Alba and E. Vicari, Temperature-disorder phase di- agram of a three-dimensional gauge-glass model, Phys. Rev. B83, 094203 (2011)

    2011

  36. [36]

    Billoire, L

    A. Billoire, L. A. Fernandez, A. Maiorano, E. Marinari, V. Martin-Mayor, and D. Yllanes, Finite-size scaling analysis of the distributions of pseudo-critical tempera- tures in spin glasses, J. Stat. Mech. (2011) P10019

    2011

  37. [37]

    Ceccarelli, A

    G. Ceccarelli, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Ferromagnetic-glassy transitions in three-dimensional 11 Ising spin glasses, Phys. Rev. B84, 134202 (2011)

    2011

  38. [38]

    Baity-Jesi, R

    Janus Collaboration, M. Baity-Jesi, R. A. Ba˜ nos, A. Cruz, L. A. Fernandez, J. M. Gil-Narvion, A. Gordillo- Guerrero, D. I˜ niguez, A. Maiorano, F. Mantovani, E. Marinari, V. Martin-Mayor, J. Monforte-Garcia, A. Mu˜ noz Sudupe, D. Navarro, G. Parisi, S. Perez-Gaviro, M. Pivanti, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, S. F. Schifano, B. Seoane, A. Taranc...

    2013

  39. [39]

    Baity-Jesi, L

    M. Baity-Jesi, L. A. Fernandez, V. Martin-Mayor, and J. M. Sanz, Phase Transition in 3d Heisenberg Spin Glasses with Strong Random Anisotropies, through a Multi-GPU Parallelization, Phys. Rev. B 89, 014202 (2014)

    2014

  40. [40]

    Lulli, G

    M. Lulli, G. Parisi, and A. Pelissetto, Out-of- equilibrium finite-size method for critical behavior anal- yses, Phys. Rev. E93, 032126 (2016)

    2016

  41. [41]

    Aspelmeier, H

    T. Aspelmeier, H. G. Katzgraber, D. Larson, M. A. Moore, M. Wittmann, and J. Yeo, Finite-size critical scaling in Ising spin glasses in the mean-field regime, Phys. Rev. E93, 032123 (2016)

    2016

  42. [42]

    L. A. Fernandez, E. Marinari, V. Martin-Mayor, G. Parisi, and J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, Universal critical behav- ior of the 2d Ising spin glass, Phys. Rev. B94, 024402 (2016)

    2016

  43. [43]

    A. G. Cavaliere and A. Pelissetto, Disordered Ising model with correlated frustration, J. Phys. A52, 174002 (2019)

    2019

  44. [44]

    Ogawa, K

    T. Ogawa, K. Uematsu, and H. Kawamura, Monte Carlo studies of the spin-chirality decoupling in the three- dimensional Heisenberg spin glass, Phys. Rev. B101, 014434 (2020)

    2020

  45. [45]

    Nishimori, Anomalous distribution of magnetization in an Ising spin glass with correlated disorder, Phys

    H. Nishimori, Anomalous distribution of magnetization in an Ising spin glass with correlated disorder, Phys. Rev. E110, 064108 (2024); Instability of the ferro- magnetic phase under random fields in an Ising spin glass with correlated disorder, Phys. Rev. E111, 044109 (2025)

    2024

  46. [46]

    F. J. Wegner, Duality in generalized Ising models and phase transitions without local order parameters, Jour. of Math. Phys.12, 2259 (1971)

    1971

  47. [47]

    J. B. Kogut, An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.51, 659 (1979)

    1979

  48. [48]

    Sachdev, Topological order, emergent gauge fields, and Fermi surface reconstruction, Rep

    S. Sachdev, Topological order, emergent gauge fields, and Fermi surface reconstruction, Rep. Prog. Phys.82, 014001 (2019)

    2019

  49. [49]

    Bonati, A

    C. Bonati, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Three- dimensional Abelian and non-Abelian gauge Higgs the- ories, Phys. Rep.1133, 1 (2025)

    2025

  50. [50]

    Dennis, A

    E. Dennis, A. Kitaev, A. Landahl, and J. Preskill, Topological quantum memory, J. Math. Phys.43, 4452 (2002)

    2002

  51. [51]

    Wang, J, Harrington, and J

    C. Wang, J, Harrington, and J. Preskill, Confinement- Higgs transition in a disordered gauge theory and the accuracy threshold for quantum memory, Ann. Phys. 303, 31 (2003)

    2003

  52. [52]

    T. Ojno, G. Arakawa, I. Ichinose, and T. Matsui, Struc- ture of the Random-PlaquetteZ 2 Gauge Model: Ac- curacy Threshold for a Toric Quantum Memory, Nucl. Phys. B697, 462 (2004)

    2004

  53. [53]

    Bonati and E

    C. Bonati and E. Vicari, Finite-temperature topologi- cal transitions in the presence of quenched uncorrelated disorder, arXiv:2601.12001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Calabrese, P

    P. Calabrese, P. Parruccini, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Crossover behavior in three-dimensional dilute Ising sys- tems, Phys. Rev. E69, 036120 (2004)

    2004

  55. [55]

    Hasenbusch, F

    M. Hasenbusch, F. Parisen Toldin, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Universal dependence on disorder of two- dimensional randomly dilute and random-bond±J Ising models, Phys. Rev. E78, 011110 (2008)

    2008

  56. [56]

    Balian, J

    R. Balian, J. M. Drouffe, and C. Itzykson, Gauge fields on a lattice. i. general outlook, Phys. Rev. D10, 3376 (1974)

    1974

  57. [57]

    Balian, J

    R. Balian, J. M. Drouffe, and C. Itzykson, Gauge fields on a lattice. II. Gauge-invariant Ising model, Phys. Rev. D11, 2098 (1975)

    2098

  58. [58]

    Osterwalder and E.Seiler, Gauge Field Theories on the Lattice, Annals Phys.110, 440 (1978)

    K. Osterwalder and E.Seiler, Gauge Field Theories on the Lattice, Annals Phys.110, 440 (1978)

    1978

  59. [59]

    Fradkin and S

    E. Fradkin and S. Shenker, Phase diagrams of lattice gauge theories with Higgs fields, Phys. Rev. D19, 3682 (1979)

    1979

  60. [60]

    G. A. Jongeward, J. D. Stack, and C. Jayaprakash, Monte Carlo calculations onZ 2 gauge-Higgs theories, Phys. Rev. D21, 3360 (1980)

    1980

  61. [61]

    D. A. Huse and St. Leibler, Are sponge phases of mem- branes experimental gauge-higgs systems?, Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 437 (1991)

    1991

  62. [62]

    Genovese, F

    L. Genovese, F. Gliozzi, A. Rago, and C. Torrero, The phase diagram of the three-dimensionalZ 2 gauge Higgs system at zero and finite temperature, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.119, 894 (2003)

    2003

  63. [63]

    Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Ann

    A. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Ann. Phys. New York303, 2 (2003)

    2003

  64. [64]

    Nussinov, Derivation of the Fradkin-Shenker result from duality: Links to spin systems in external mag- netic fields and percolation crossovers, Phys

    Z. Nussinov, Derivation of the Fradkin-Shenker result from duality: Links to spin systems in external mag- netic fields and percolation crossovers, Phys. Rev. D 72, 054509 (2005)

    2005

  65. [65]

    Caudy and J

    W. Caudy and J. Greensite, On the ambiguity of spon- taneously broken gauge symmetry, Phys. Rev. D78, 025018 (2008)

    2008

  66. [66]

    Vidal, S

    J. Vidal, S. Dusuel, and K. P. Schmidt, Low-energy ef- fective theory of the toric code model in a parallel mag- netic field, Phys. Rev. B79, 033109 (2009)

    2009

  67. [67]

    I. S. Tupitsyn, A. Kitaev, N. V. Prokofev, and P. C. E. Stamp, Topological multicritical point in the phase diagram of the toric code model and three-dimensional lattice gauge Higgs model, Phys. Rev. B82, 085114 (2010)

    2010

  68. [68]

    Gregor, D

    K. Gregor, D. A. Huse, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Diagnosing deconfinement and topological order, New Jour. of Phys.13, 025009 (2011)

    2011

  69. [69]

    Dusuel, M

    S. Dusuel, M. Kamfor, R. Orus, K. P. Schmidt, and J. Vidal, Robustness of a perturbed topological phase, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 107203 (2011)

    2011

  70. [70]

    Cobanera, G

    E. Cobanera, G. Ortiz, and Z. Nussinov, The bond- algebraic approach to dualities, Advances in Physics60, 679 (2011)

    2011

  71. [71]

    F. Wu, Y. Deng, and N. Prokofev, Phase diagram of the toric code model in a parallel magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B85, 195104 (2012)

    2012

  72. [72]

    Fradkin,Field theories of condensed matter physics (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    E. Fradkin,Field theories of condensed matter physics (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    2013

  73. [73]

    Somoza, P

    A. Somoza, P. Serna, and A. Nahum, Self-dual critical- ity in three-dimensionalZ 2 gauge theory with matter, Phys. Rev. X11, 041008 (2021)

    2021

  74. [74]

    Grady, Exploring the 3D Ising gauge-Higgs model in exact Coulomb gauge and with a gauge-invariant sub- 12 stitute for Landau gauge, arXiv:2109.04560

    M. Grady, Exploring the 3D Ising gauge-Higgs model in exact Coulomb gauge and with a gauge-invariant sub- 12 stitute for Landau gauge, arXiv:2109.04560

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  75. [75]

    Homeier, C

    L. Homeier, C. Schweizer, M. Aidelsburger, A. Fedorov, and F. Grusdt,Z 2 lattice gauge theories and Kitaev’s toric code: A scheme for analog quantum simulation, arXiv:2012.05235

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  76. [76]

    Bonati, A

    C. Bonati, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Multicritical point of the three-dimensionalZ 2 gauge Higgs model, Phys. Rev. B105, 165138 (2022)

    2022

  77. [77]

    W.-T. Xu, F. Pollmann, and M. Knap, Critical behavior of the Fredenhagen-Marcu order parameter at topolog- ical phase transitions, npj Quantum Inf.11, 74 (2025)

    2025

  78. [78]

    Bonati, A

    C. Bonati, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Diverse univer- sality classes of the topological deconfinement transi- tions of three-dimensional noncompact lattice Abelian Higgs models Phys. Rev. D109, 034517 (2024)

    2024

  79. [79]

    Serna, A

    P. Serna, A. M. Somoza, and A. Nahum, Worldsheet patching, 1-form symmetries, and Landau ∗ phase tran- sitions, Phys. Rev. B110, 115102 (2024)

    2024

  80. [80]

    Savit, Duality in Field Theory and Statistical Sys- tems, Rev

    R. Savit, Duality in Field Theory and Statistical Sys- tems, Rev. Mod. Phys.52, 453 (1980)

    1980

Showing first 80 references.