Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 58 references

This paper claims that a four-dimensional charged anti-de Sitter black hole with a non-minimal coupling of the electromagnetic field to the Riemann tensor exhibits van der Waals-like phase transitions and belongs to a universal topological

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 22:46 UTC pith:QNO7AWZE

load-bearing objection Routine but competent: the topological classification is a repackaging of the paper's own thermodynamics, and the main defect is a factor-of-10 typo in the Q=0.8 critical temperature, while the feared Wald-entropy problem actually checks out. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2602.15714 v1 pith:QNO7AWZE submitted 2026-02-17 hep-th

Thermodynamic Topology of 4D Charged AdS Black Holes with F^(αβ)F^(γλ)R_(αγβλ) Coupling

Mehdi Sadeghi , Faramarz Rahmani This is my paper
classification hep-th PACS 11.25.Tq04.70.Dy04.70.Bw04.50.Kd
keywords AdS black holesblack hole thermodynamicsnon-minimal couplingtopological classificationphase transitionswinding numbervan der Waals criticalityperturbative solution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies a 4D charged AdS black hole with a non-minimal interaction between the Maxwell field and curvature, of the form F^{αβ}F^{γλ}R_{αγβλ}. Using a perturbative expansion in the small coupling ε, the authors derive a corrected black hole solution, then analyze its thermodynamics both conventionally and through a topological defect formalism. They find van der Waals-like critical behavior with a swallow-tail free energy and three phase branches. In the topological analysis, these branches appear as defects with winding numbers (+1, −1, +1), summing to W=+1, which together with the asymptotic behavior of the inverse temperature places the system in class III (W₁₊), the same class as Reissner–Nordström–AdS black holes. A sympathetic reader should care because the result suggests that the universal topological classification of black hole thermodynamics is insensitive to the detailed form of curvature–gauge couplings.

Core claim

For small ε, the black hole's thermodynamics is described by a first-order-corrected enthalpy, entropy, and free energy. The entropy gets a correction S = π r_h² − κπ Q² ε / r_h², and the pressure–horizon relation shows a van der Waals-like critical point (r_c ≈ 0.61, T_c ≈ 0.17, P_c ≈ 0.05 for Q=0.5, ε=0.001). The off-shell free energy F = M − S/τ generates a vector field whose zero points are the black hole states; these appear as three topological defects with winding numbers +1, −1, +1. The total topological charge is W=+1, and the inverse temperature β(r_h) diverges as r_h approaches the minimal horizon and tends to zero as r_h → ∞, a signature of class III (W₁₊). The paper claims this

What carries the argument

The central object is the off-shell free energy F = M − S/τ, from which a two-component vector field φ = (∂F/∂r_h, cot Θ csc Θ) is constructed in an auxiliary plane (r_h, Θ). Zero points of φ correspond to equilibrium black hole states, and the winding number of each zero point (computed via the topological current method or deflection angle) assigns a charge: +1 for locally stable branches, −1 for unstable ones. The global topological number W is the sum of all winding numbers, and together with the asymptotic values of β(r_h) at the boundaries, it determines the universal topological class (I–IV). The paper also uses a perturbative solution scheme: it expands the metric and gauge field in

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes the standard extended-phase-space relation dH = T dS and computes the entropy correction by integrating (1/T)(∂H/∂r_h) at fixed P,Q, which is not proven to be the correct Wald/Noether entropy for this non-minimally coupled higher-derivative action; if the first law is modified, the free energy, critical values, and topological charges all shift.

What would settle it

Compute the Wald/Noether-charge entropy for the full action with F^{αβ}F^{γλ}R_{αγβλ} coupling and compare it with S = π r_h² − κπ Q² ε / r_h². If the two entropies differ, the off-shell free energy changes, and the winding numbers and claimed class III assignment likely change as well.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the classification is correct, the non-minimally coupled black hole joins the same universal topological class as RN-AdS black holes, strengthening the idea that the topological class is determined mainly by the asymptotic stability structure rather than by the specific matter–gravity interaction.
  • The conventional van der Waals-like phase structure (swallow-tail free energy, stable/unstable/stable branches below the critical pressure) is confirmed independently by the topological winding numbers, providing a cross-check of both methods.
  • The critical point, heat capacity divergences, and Davies points computed in the extended phase space are tied to the topological degeneracy points where pairs of defects are generated or annihilated.
  • The entropy correction at first order in ε shifts the phase diagram and critical values, implying that even small non-minimal couplings can measurably alter black hole thermodynamics while preserving the overall topological class.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: The paper's thermodynamic quantities rely on an entropy derived from the integrated first law rather than from a Wald/Noether charge. If the correct entropy for this higher-derivative action differs, the free energy and critical values would shift, and the winding numbers could potentially change; the topological class assignment deserves scrutiny against a full Wald calculati
  • Editorial inference: The perturbative horizon-shift matching condition (h₁/f₁ consistency) is only imposed at first order. At higher orders in ε, the matching may fail or require additional counterterms, which could alter the phase structure in the strong-coupling regime.
  • Editorial inference: A direct testable extension is to compute the Wald entropy explicitly for the action and re-derive the first law; if it deviates, the topological classification of this model may still hold, but with modified critical exponents.
  • Editorial inference: The paper's claim of universality suggests that other non-minimal couplings (e.g., Ricci-scalar or Ricci-tensor coupled to F²) would also fall into class III as long as they admit a stable large black hole branch; checking this would clarify the limits of the universality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a four-dimensional charged AdS black hole with a non-minimal gauge–curvature coupling F^{αβ}F^{γλ}R_{αγβλ}. A first-order perturbative solution is constructed for the metric and gauge field, and the resulting ADM mass, Hawking temperature, entropy, pressure, and Helmholtz free energy are computed. The conventional thermodynamic analysis identifies a van der Waals-like critical point and a swallow-tail free-energy structure. The same thermodynamic quantities are then used in the Wei–Liu–Mann off-shell free-energy formalism to compute winding numbers for the equilibrium branches. The authors report three defects with winding numbers (+1, −1, +1), total W = +1, and asymptotic behavior β(r_m) → ∞, β(∞) → 0, placing the system in class III (W_{1+}) of the universal topological classification.

Significance. If the derivation is correct, the paper provides another explicit example of a higher-derivative-corrected black hole that falls into the universal topological class W_{1+}, supporting the claim that the classification is robust across modifications of Einstein–Maxwell theory. The first-order analytic solution and thermodynamic quantities are obtained without fitting any parameters to a desired phase structure, which is a strength. However, the topological analysis is not an independent confirmation: it is constructed from the very same H, S, and T that define the conventional phase structure, so the winding numbers are a repackaging of the standard thermodynamics rather than an independent test. Nevertheless, the classification itself can still be a useful organizational statement if the underlying thermodynamics is correct.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.1, Fig. 5] The Q = 0.8 example is internally inconsistent. The text quotes T_c = 0.0108, which gives τ_c ≈ 92.6. Then at τ = 12 one would be below the critical inverse temperature, and the r_h–τ curve should have only one intersection, not the three zero points ZP1, ZP2, ZP3 claimed in Fig. 5. The correct critical temperature for the zeroth-order RN-AdS-type solution with Q = 0.8 is T_c ≈ 0.108, with τ_c ≈ 9.26; only then is τ = 12 above τ_c and three branches possible. This factor-of-10 typo undermines the second topological example and must be corrected, with the figures and zero-point values re-checked.
  2. [§3, Eq. (47)] The entropy is defined by integrating (1/T)(∂H/∂r_h) at fixed P and Q, which presumes the standard extended-phase-space first law dH = T dS + ... . For a non-minimally coupled higher-derivative action this is not self-evident; the correct entropy should follow from the Wald/Noether charge or from the Euclidean action. The authors do not provide such a derivation. A first-order Wald calculation can reproduce Eq. (47) with a suitable normalization, so the issue is likely fixable, but the manuscript must include the check explicitly before the thermodynamic and topological results can be accepted as consistent.
  3. [§2, Eq. (14)] The perturbative solution is obtained using the tt and rr components and the Maxwell equation, but the θθ component of the Einstein equations is never verified at O(ϵ). Since Eq. (14) is an independent component for a static spherically symmetric ansatz, the consistency of the solution requires checking that it is satisfied to the same order. The paper should either explicitly verify Eq. (14) at O(ϵ) or explain why it is redundant given the other equations.
  4. [Abstract and §5] The abstract and conclusions state that the topological analysis 'independently confirms' the phase structure. This overstates the case: the off-shell free energy (66) is built from the same enthalpy, entropy, and temperature used in the conventional analysis, and the winding numbers are computed from the derivative of that same free energy. The topological classification is therefore a repackaging of the standard thermodynamics rather than an independent confirmation. Please temper this claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4, Eq. (55) vs Eq. (67)] The definition of φ_Θ is given as cot Θ csc Θ in Eq. (55), but as −cot Θ csc Θ in Eq. (67). The standard convention uses the latter; please harmonize the sign consistently.
  2. [Fig. 1 caption and §3] The text says 'Fixing Q = 0.5 and ϵ = 0.001' and gives one critical point, while the Fig. 1 caption says the panels are for different charge values. Please clarify which charge values are actually plotted and whether Fig. 1 is for the same Q or a range of Q.
  3. [References] There are duplicated entries ([22] and [41]; [34] and [54] are the same Duan reference), and reference [37] contains an unconverted ':contentReference[oaicite:12]' artifact. Please clean up the bibliography.
  4. [Eq. (46)] The final equality '(∂H/∂r_h / ∂S/∂r_h)' is missing parentheses and should be written as (∂H/∂r_h)/(∂S/∂r_h) evaluated at fixed P and Q. The displayed chain of equalities is also hard to parse because the intermediate expressions run together.
  5. [Fig. 2 caption] The left-panel caption says 'For P = 0.08, only one stable phase exists.' Since P_c ≈ 0.05 for Q = 0.5, this statement is correct, but it would be useful to state explicitly that 0.08 > P_c.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Thermodynamic derivation is self-contained, but the advertised 'independent' topological confirmation is a repackaging of the heat-capacity sign by construction.

specific steps
  1. renaming known result [Abstract; Section 4, Eqs. (54), (58), (65); Section 4.1 after Eq. (67); Table 2]
    "The topological analysis independently confirms the existence of critical points ... wi = ηi = sign ∂^2F/∂r_h^2 |_{rh=ZPi} ... ∂β/∂rh = − 1/T^2 ∂S/∂rh ∂T/∂S = − 1/T ∂S/∂rh 1/C ... wi = +1: Stable black hole state (positive heat capacity)."

    The vector field is defined by ϕrh = ∂F/∂rh = ∂S/∂rh (1/β − 1/τ), so its zeros are exactly the conventional equilibrium states β=τ already used in the thermodynamic analysis. The winding number is then sign(∂²F/∂r_h²), which by Eq. (65) is the sign of ∂T/∂r_h and therefore, since ∂S/∂r_h > 0, the sign of C_P. Table 2 itself defines w=+1 as 'stable/positive heat capacity' and w=−1 as 'unstable/negative heat capacity'. Thus the topological class W_1+ is the same heat-capacity sign sequence as the conventional analysis, relabeled as winding numbers. No parameter is fitted, so the van der Waals critical-point calculation itself is independent; but the abstract's claim of 'independent confirmation' is not supported by the construction.

full rationale

The perturbative solution, mass, temperature, entropy, free energy, and criticality are derived in a self-contained way from the stated action, and no fitted parameter is used to force the phase structure. The entropy computed via the first-law identity is consistent with the Wald entropy to this order, so the entropy choice is not a circular input. The main circularity-adjacent defect is the topological 'confirmation': because the off-shell free energy uses the same H and S and the winding number is defined as sign(C_P), the topological classification cannot independently confirm the phase structure. This is an overclaim of independence rather than a fabricated derivation. The Q=0.8 example also contains an internal numerical inconsistency (T_c printed as 0.0108 versus ≈0.108 for r_c=0.980), but that is a consistency/typo issue, not circularity. No load-bearing self-citation chain was found.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or dimensions are invented. The key external inputs are the model action, the first-law/entropy assumption, and the topological classification framework. The free parameters ε and Q are chosen for demonstration rather than fitted to external data.

free parameters (2)
  • ε (non-minimal coupling) = 0.001 (chosen; dimensionful L²)
    The entire perturbative expansion and all numerical phase diagrams depend on this small coupling. It is a model parameter chosen by hand, not fitted to data.
  • Q (Maxwell charge) = 0.5 and 0.8
    The numerical critical values and topological zero points are computed only for these two charge values; the claimed class-III result is demonstrated for these examples.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The action (1) with the FFR non-minimal coupling is a valid effective theory and ε/ℓ² is small enough for first-order perturbation theory.
    Section 2 introduces the model and defines the expansion parameter ξ=ε/ℓ². All results depend on this assumption.
  • domain assumption The standard extended phase space first law dH=TdS holds, and S obtained by integrating (1/T)(∂H/∂r_h) is the true entropy.
    Eq. (47) defines the entropy correction. For a non-minimally coupled higher-derivative action, this must be justified by Wald entropy or an action calculation; the paper does not provide that.
  • domain assumption The Hawking temperature is given by surface gravity, T=e^{-H(r_h)}f'(r_h)/(4π), at first order in ε.
    Eq. (46). This is standard for static black holes but is transferred without derivation to a theory with derivative gauge-curvature couplings.
  • standard math Duan's ϕ-mapping topological current and the Wei-Liu-Mann four-class universal classification apply to this thermodynamic system.
    Section 4 applies Refs. [30,54,55] as an external framework; the paper does not re-derive the classification.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 17137 in / 22137 out tokens · 201764 ms · 2026-08-02T22:46:07.519894+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the thermodynamic phase transitions of a four-dimensional charged anti-de Sitter black hole endowed with a non-minimal coupling of the form $F^{\alpha\beta}F^{\gamma\lambda}R_{\alpha\gamma\beta\lambda}$. Using perturbative methods, we derive a consistent black hole solution and analyze its thermodynamics through both conventional equilibrium techniques and a topological defect classification approach. The system displays van der Waals-like critical behavior, with a swallow-tail structure in the free energy and distinct phase branches. The topological analysis independently confirms the existence of critical points and classifies the system within the universal topological scheme for black hole thermodynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.15714 by Faramarz Rahmani, Mehdi Sadeghi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Van der Waals-like behavior in the P–rh and T–rh diagrams. (a) Pressure as a function of rh at the critical temperature Tc = 0.17 for several charge values. (b) Temperature as a function of rh at the critical pressure Pc = 0.05 for several charge values. The left panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Local and global thermodynamic behavior of the system. (a) Heat capacity for subcritical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Topological structure and phase diagram for the black hole system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The left panel shows the contours Φi , which clearly reflect winding numbers of +1, −1, and +1 for the three zero points. The right panel shows the behavior of the deflection angle around each zero point. As expected, for the small and large black holes, Ω(2π) = 2π, whereas for the intermediate unstable black hole, Ω(2π) = −2π. (a) Mapping of contours to the ϕ-plane (b) Deflection angle Ω(ϑ) for each conto… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Unit vector field topology and deflection angle analysis. (a) The unit vector field and its [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 34 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation,

    A. Einstein, “Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation,”Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. (1915) 844–847

    1915

  2. [2]

    On the Gravitational Field of a Mass Point according to Einstein’s Theory,

    K. Schwarzschild, “On the Gravitational Field of a Mass Point according to Einstein’s Theory,”Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss.(1916) 189–196

    1916

  3. [3]

    Black holes and entropy,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,”Phys. Rev. D7, 2333–2346 (1973)

    1973

  4. [4]

    Particle creation by black holes,

    S. W. Hawking, “Particle creation by black holes,”Commun. Math. Phys.43, 199–220 (1975). 23

    1975

  5. [5]

    Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,

    G. ’t Hooft, “Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,” inSalamfestschrift, World Scientific, Singapore (1993), arXiv:gr-qc/9310026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  6. [6]

    The world as a hologram,

    L. Susskind, “The world as a hologram,”J. Math. Phys.36, 6377–6396 (1995)

    1995

  7. [7]

    The LargeNLimit of Superconformal Field Theories and Super- gravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The LargeNLimit of Superconformal Field Theories and Super- gravity,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 231–252 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  8. [8]

    Quantum Geometry of Isolated Horizons and Black Hole Entropy,

    A. Ashtekar, J. Baez, and K. Krasnov, “Quantum Geometry of Isolated Horizons and Black Hole Entropy,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.4, 1–94 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0005126

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  9. [9]

    Thermodynamics of Black Holes in Anti-de Sitter Space,

    S. W. Hawking and D. N. Page, “Thermodynamics of Black Holes in Anti-de Sitter Space,”Commun. Math. Phys.87, 577–588 (1983)

    1983

  10. [10]

    Anti-de Sitter Space, Thermal Phase Transition, and Confinement in Gauge Theories,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter Space, Thermal Phase Transition, and Confinement in Gauge Theories,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 505–532 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9803131

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  11. [11]

    The Shear Viscosity of Strongly Cou- pledN= 4 Supersymmetric Yang–Mills Plasma,

    G. Policastro, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, “The Shear Viscosity of Strongly Cou- pledN= 4 Supersymmetric Yang–Mills Plasma,”Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 081601 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0104066

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  12. [12]

    A Covariant Holographic Entan- glement Entropy Proposal,

    V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani, and T. Takayanagi, “A Covariant Holographic Entan- glement Entropy Proposal,”JHEP07, 062 (2011), arXiv:1105.6055 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  13. [13]

    Foundations of the New Field Theory,

    M. Born and L. Infeld, “Foundations of the New Field Theory,”Proc. R. Soc. A144, 425–451 (1934)

    1934

  14. [14]

    Extended Phase Space Thermody- namics for Charged and Rotating Black Holes and Born–Infeld Vacuum Polarization,

    S. Gunasekaran, R. B. Mann, and D. Kubizˇ n´ ak, “Extended Phase Space Thermody- namics for Charged and Rotating Black Holes and Born–Infeld Vacuum Polarization,” JHEP11, 110 (2012), arXiv:1208.6251 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  15. [15]

    Black hole chemistry: thermodynamics with Lambda,

    D. Kubizˇ n´ ak, R. B. Mann, and M. Teo, “Black hole chemistry: thermodynamics with Lambda,”Class. Quant. Grav.34, 063001 (2017), arXiv:1609.01730 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    The Einstein Tensor and Its Generalizations,

    D. Lovelock, “The Einstein Tensor and Its Generalizations,”J. Math. Phys.12, 498–501 (1971)

    1971

  17. [17]

    P–Vcriticality in the extended phase space of Gauss–Bonnet black holes in AdS space,

    R.-G. Cai, L.-M. Cao, L. Li, and R.-Q. Yang, “P–Vcriticality in the extended phase space of Gauss–Bonnet black holes in AdS space,”JHEP09, 005 (2013), arXiv:1306.6233 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  18. [18]

    Resummation of Massive Gravity,

    C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze, and A. J. Tolley, “Resummation of Massive Gravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 231101 (2011), arXiv:1011.1232 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  19. [19]

    P–Vcriticality in the extended phase space of black holes in massive gravity,

    J. Xu, L.-M. Cao, and Y.-P. Hu, “P–Vcriticality in the extended phase space of black holes in massive gravity,”Phys. Rev. D91, 124033 (2015), arXiv:1506.03578 [gr-qc]. 24

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  20. [20]

    Second-order scalar–tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space,

    G. W. Horndeski, “Second-order scalar–tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space,”Int. J. Theor. Phys.10, 363–384 (1974)

    1974

  21. [21]

    Thermodynamics of black holes in Horndeski the- ory,

    M. Bravo-Gaete and M. Hassa ¨ ıne, “Thermodynamics of black holes in Horndeski the- ory,”Phys. Rev. D91, 064038 (2015), arXiv:1501.03308 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  22. [22]

    QED vacuum polarization in a background grav- itational field and its effect on the velocity of photons,

    I. T. Drummond and S. J. Hathrell, “QED vacuum polarization in a background grav- itational field and its effect on the velocity of photons,”Phys. Rev. D22, 343–355 (1980)

    1980

  23. [23]

    Axionic black branes in the k-essence sector of the Horndeski model,

    A. Cisterna, M. Hassa ¨ ıne, J. Oliva, and M. Rinaldi, “Axionic black branes in the k-essence sector of the Horndeski model,”Phys. Rev. D100, 124041 (2019). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.124041 [arXiv:1905.10645 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    P–Vcriticality of charged AdS black holes,

    D. Kubizˇ n´ ak and R. B. Mann, “P–Vcriticality of charged AdS black holes,”JHEP07, 033 (2012), arXiv:1205.0559 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  25. [25]

    Kerr–AdS analogue of triple point and solid–liquid–gas phase transition,

    N. Altamirano, D. Kubizˇ n´ ak, R. B. Mann, and Z. Sherkatghanad, “Kerr–AdS analogue of triple point and solid–liquid–gas phase transition,”Class. Quant. Grav.31, 042001 (2014), arXiv:1308.2672 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  26. [26]

    Triple points and phase diagrams of charged AdS black holes,

    S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu, “Triple points and phase diagrams of charged AdS black holes,”Phys. Rev. D90, 044057 (2014), arXiv:1402.2837 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  27. [27]

    Topology of black hole thermodynamics,

    S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu, “Topology of black hole thermodynamics,”Phys. Rev. D105, 104003 (2022), arXiv:2112.01706 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    Topological charge and black hole phase transition,

    S.-W. Wei, “Topological charge and black hole phase transition,”Phys. Rev. D102, 064039 (2020), arXiv:2006.02112 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    Topological phase transition in black hole thermodynamics,

    J. Mo, G. Li, and X. Xu, “Topological phase transition in black hole thermodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D106, 084041 (2022), arXiv:2205.03328 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Universal topological classifica- tions of black hole thermodynamics,

    S. W. Wei, Y. X. Liu and R. B. Mann, “Universal topological classifica- tions of black hole thermodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.8, L081501 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.L081501 [arXiv:2409.09333 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Black Hole Solutions as Topo- logical Thermodynamic Defects,

    S. W. Wei, Y. X. Liu and R. B. Mann, “Black Hole Solutions as Topo- logical Thermodynamic Defects,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129, no.19, 191101 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.191101 [arXiv:2208.01932 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Topology of critical points and Hawking-Page tran- sition,

    P. K. Yerra and C. Bhamidipati, “Topology of critical points and Hawking-Page tran- sition,”Phys. Rev. D106, 064059 (2022)

    2022

  33. [33]

    Topological natures of the Gauss-Bonnet black hole in AdS space,

    C. Liu and J. Wang, “Topological natures of the Gauss-Bonnet black hole in AdS space,” Phys. Rev. D107, no.6, 064023 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.064023 [arXiv:2211.05524 [gr-qc]]. 25

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    The topological structure ofϕ-mapping in gauge field theory,

    Y. S. Duan, “The topological structure ofϕ-mapping in gauge field theory,”Sci. Sin. 22, 481–497 (1979)

    1979

  35. [35]

    The bifurcation theory of the topological current,

    Y. S. Duan, S. Li, and G. H. Yang, “The bifurcation theory of the topological current,” Nucl. Phys. B514, 705–716 (1998)

    1998

  36. [36]

    Vortex-antivortex pair cre- ation in black hole thermodynamics,

    M. B. Ahmed, D. Kubiznak and R. B. Mann, “Vortex-antivortex pair cre- ation in black hole thermodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D107, no.4, 046013 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.046013 [arXiv:2207.02147 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Non-minimal coupling for the gravitational and electromagnetic fields: general system of equations,

    A. B. Balakin and J. P. S. Lemos, “Non-minimal coupling for the gravitational and electromagnetic fields: general system of equations,”Class. Quant. Grav.22, 1867–1880 (2005). :contentReference[oaicite:12]

    2005

  38. [38]

    Non-minimal ln(R)F 2 couplings of electromagnetic fields to gravity,

    T. Dereli and ¨O. Sert, “Non-minimal ln(R)F 2 couplings of electromagnetic fields to gravity,”Eur. Phys. J. C71, 1589 (2011)

    2011

  39. [39]

    Mahapatra, JHEP 04, 142 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2016)142 [arXiv:1602.03007 [hep-th]]

    S. Mahapatra, JHEP 04, 142 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2016)142 [arXiv:1602.03007 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  40. [40]

    Holographic aspects of non-minimalRF (a) µα F (a)µα black branes,

    M. Sadeghi, “Holographic aspects of non-minimalRF (a) µα F (a)µα black branes,” arXiv:2302.07247 [hep-th] (2023)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    QED vacuum polarization in a background grav- itational field and its effect on the velocity of photons,

    I. T. Drummond and S. J. Hathrell, “QED vacuum polarization in a background grav- itational field and its effect on the velocity of photons,” Phys. Rev. D22, 343 (1980)

    1980

  42. [42]

    Effective Action in Quantum Gravity,

    I. L. Buchbinder, S. D. Odintsov and I. L. Shapiro, “Effective Action in Quantum Gravity,” IOP Publishing (1992)

    1992

  43. [43]

    Superluminality and UV completion,

    G. M. Shore, “Superluminality and UV completion,” Nucl. Phys. B778, 219 (2007), [arXiv:hep-th/0701185]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  44. [44]

    Nonminimal Einstein–Maxwell–Vlasov model: dynamo-optical interactions in cosmology,

    A. B. Balakin and A. E. Zayats, “Nonminimal Einstein–Maxwell–Vlasov model: dynamo-optical interactions in cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D92, 024017 (2015), [arXiv:1503.06257]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  45. [45]

    Thermodynamics and phase transitions of a nonminimal Ein- stein–Maxwell black hole,

    ¨O. Sert and H. Sari, “Thermodynamics and phase transitions of a nonminimal Ein- stein–Maxwell black hole,” Phys. Rev. D102, 104060 (2020), [arXiv:2007.07563]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Photon propagation in nonminimal coupling gravity,

    G. Lambiase and G. Scarpetta, “Photon propagation in nonminimal coupling gravity,” Phys. Rev. D78, 084014 (2008), [arXiv:0808.1701]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  47. [47]

    The dynamics of general relativity,

    R. Arnowitt, S. Deser and C. W. Misner, “The dynamics of general relativity,” in *Gravitation: An Introduction to Current Research*, edited by L. Witten (Wiley, New York, 1962) [arXiv:gr-qc/0405109]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1962

  48. [48]

    Asymptotically anti-de Sitter spaces,

    M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, “Asymptotically anti-de Sitter spaces,” Commun. Math. Phys.98, 391 (1985). 26

    1985

  49. [49]

    Asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes and scalar fields with a logarithmic branch,

    M. Henneaux, C. Martinez, R. Troncoso and J. Zanelli, “Asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes and scalar fields with a logarithmic branch,” Phys. Rev. D70, 044034 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0404236]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  50. [50]

    Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,

    K. Skenderis, “Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,” Class. Quant. Grav.19, 5849 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0209067]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  51. [51]

    A stress tensor for Anti-de Sitter gravity,

    V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus, “A stress tensor for Anti-de Sitter gravity,” Com- mun. Math. Phys.208, 413 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9902121]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  52. [52]

    Holographic reconstruction of spacetime and renormalization in the AdS/CFT correspondence,

    S. de Haro, S. N. Solodukhin and K. Skenderis, “Holographic reconstruction of spacetime and renormalization in the AdS/CFT correspondence,” Commun. Math. Phys.217, 595 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0002230]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  53. [53]

    Thermodynamic behavior of a 4D nonminimal Maxwell–AdS black hole,

    M. Sadeghi and F. Rahmani, “Thermodynamic behavior of a 4D nonminimal Maxwell–AdS black hole,” Class. Quantum Grav.42, 215008 (2025)

    2025

  54. [54]

    The structure of topological current,

    Y. S. Duan, “The structure of topological current,” Int. J. Theor. Phys.37, 2419 (1998)

    1998

  55. [55]

    SU(2) gauge theory and electrodynamics,

    Y. S. Duan and M. L. Ge, “SU(2) gauge theory and electrodynamics,” Sci. Sinica11, 1072 (1979)

    1979

  56. [56]

    Black hole thermodynamics and the Euclidean Einstein action,

    J. W. York, “Black hole thermodynamics and the Euclidean Einstein action,” Phys. Rev. D33, 2092 (1986)

    2092

  57. [57]

    Action integrals and partition functions in quan- tum gravity,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Action integrals and partition functions in quan- tum gravity,” Phys. Rev. D15, 2752 (1977)

    1977

  58. [58]

    Black holes and thermodynamics,

    S. W. Hawking, “Black holes and thermodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D13, 191 (1976). 27

    1976