Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Efficient privacy loss accounting for subsampling and random allocation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2602.17284 v2 pith:KDXIWPXU submitted 2026-02-19 cs.LG

Efficient privacy loss accounting for subsampling and random allocation

classification cs.LG
keywords privacylosssamplingaccountingallocationrandomappliedpoisson
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the privacy amplification properties of a sampling scheme in which a user's data isused in $k$ steps chosen randomly and uniformly from a sequence (or set) of $t$ steps. This sampling scheme has been recently applied in the context of differentially private optimization (Chua et al., 2024a; Choquette-Choo et al., 2025) and communication-efficient high-dimensional private aggregation (Asi et al., 2026), where it was shown to have utility advantages over the standard Poisson sampling. Theoretical analyses of this sampling scheme (Feldman & Shenfeld, 2025; Dong et al., 2025) lead to bounds that are close to those of Poisson sampling, yet still have two significant shortcomings. First, in many practical settings, the resulting privacy parameters are not tight due to the approximation steps in the analysis. Second, the computed parameters are either the hockey stick or Renyi divergence, both of which introduce overheads when used in privacy loss accounting. In this work, we demonstrate that the privacy loss distribution (PLD) of random allocation applied to any differentially private algorithm can be computed efficiently. When applied to the Gaussian mechanism, our results demonstrate that the privacy-utility trade-off for random allocation is at least as good as that of Poisson subsampling. In particular, random allocation is better suited for training via DP-SGD. To support these computations, our work develops new tools for general privacy loss accounting based on a notion of PLD realization. This notion allows us to extend accurate privacy loss accounting to subsampling which previously required manual noise-mechanism-specific analysis.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Provable Robustness against Backdoor Attacks via the Primal-Dual Perspective on Differential Privacy

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new framework is introduced for end-to-end provable robustness against backdoor attacks by composing randomized smoothing with differentially private training via privacy profiles.

  2. Less Random, More Private: What is the Optimal Subsampling Scheme for DP-SGD?

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Balanced Iteration Subsampling achieves stronger privacy amplification than Poisson subsampling in DP-SGD by eliminating participation variance while keeping uniform marginal participation.