pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.17489 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Prediction of room-temperature two-dimensional π-electron half-metallic ferrimagnets

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 20:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords half-metallicferrimagnetnanographenestwo-dimensionalroom temperaturespintronicsexchange couplinganomalous Hall effect
0
0 comments X

The pith

A honeycomb lattice combining two nanographene molecules forms a room-temperature half-metallic ferrimagnet with zero net magnetization.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proposes a strategy to realize conducting organic materials with fully spin-polarized Fermi surfaces using a honeycomb crystal of two different S=1/2 nanographenes. One is an Aza-3-Triangulene with orbital degeneracy and the other a 2-Triangulene. Their combination produces ferrimagnetic order with antiferromagnetically coupled pi-orbital moments and exactly zero net magnetic moment per unit cell. Density functional theory plus Hubbard model calculations yield intermolecular exchange couplings near 50 meV, sufficient to stabilize the order at room temperature. The system is half-metallic and shows potential for a quantized anomalous Hall effect at temperatures below 1 K when magnetization is out of plane.

Core claim

The analyzed system is half-metallic with a ferrimagnetic order, presenting a zero net total magnetic moment per unit cell. Large intermolecular exchange couplings in the range of 50 meV ensure room temperature stability of this order, creating a conductor with fully spin-polarized Fermi surface at a flat band suitable for spintronics.

What carries the argument

The honeycomb lattice arrangement of Aza-3-Triangulene and 2-Triangulene molecules, whose intermolecular exchange interactions produce the ferrimagnetic half-metallic state with compensated magnetization.

If this is right

  • The Fermi surface is fully spin-polarized, allowing only one spin direction to conduct.
  • Zero net magnetization per cell minimizes stray magnetic fields in potential devices.
  • Magnetic order remains stable at room temperature due to the strong 50 meV couplings.
  • Intrinsic spin-orbit coupling can induce a topological gap leading to quantized Hall conductance at tens of mK.
  • Above 1 K the material behaves as a half-metal with compensated moments, combining traits valuable for spintronics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extensions to other triangulene-based pairs could allow engineering of different exchange strengths or band structures.
  • Defects in real samples might lower the ordering temperature, requiring high-quality synthesis to achieve the predicted performance.
  • The low-temperature topological phase suggests possible use in quantum transport experiments at millikelvin temperatures.
  • This organic platform may connect to broader efforts in 2D magnetic materials for low-power electronics.

Load-bearing premise

The large exchange couplings calculated in the ideal DFT plus Hubbard model will persist at similar magnitudes in real materials without significant reduction from defects or other effects.

What would settle it

Fabricating the proposed honeycomb structure and measuring its Curie temperature or magnetic ordering; if the order disappears well below room temperature, the stability claim is falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.17489 by A. T. Costa, J. C. G. Henriques, J. Fern\'andez-Rossier, J. Phillips.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. DFT computed magnetic profiles, electronic band [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. a) Magnon energies for selected wave vectors ex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Crystal structure for a) the undoped [2,3]triangu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Comparison of the computed LDOS using DFT (top [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. a) Power-compressed spectral density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a strategy to obtain conducting organic materials with fully spin-polarized Fermi surface, lying at a singular flat band, with antiferromagnetically coupled magnetic moments that reside in pi-orbitals of nanographenes. We consider a honeycomb crystal whose unit cell combines two different molecules with S=1/2: an Aza-3-Triangulene, a molecule with orbital degeneracy, and a 2-Triangulene. The analyzed system is half-metallic with a ferrimagnetic order, presenting a zero net total magnetic moment per unit cell. We combine density functional theory calculations with a Hubbard model Hamiltonian to compute the magnetic interactions, the bands, the intrinsic Anomalous Hall effect, and the collective spin excitations. We obtain very large intermolecular exchange couplings, in the range of 50 meV, which ensures room temperature stability. When the magnetization is off-plane, intrinsic spin orbit coupling in graphene opens up a topological gap that, despite being very small, leads to a quantized Hall conductance in the tens of mK range. Above 1 Kelvin, the system will behave like a half-metal with fully compensated magnetic moments, thereby combining two characteristics that make it ideal for spintronics applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a 2D honeycomb lattice of Aza-3-Triangulene and 2-Triangulene nanographenes as a half-metallic ferrimagnet with zero net magnetic moment per unit cell. DFT calculations combined with a Hubbard model yield intermolecular exchange couplings of ~50 meV, asserted to stabilize ferrimagnetic order at room temperature. The system is predicted to show a small SOC-induced topological gap (tens of mK) enabling quantized anomalous Hall conductance at low T while behaving as a half-metal above ~1 K, with fully spin-polarized bands and collective spin excitations computed from the model.

Significance. If the room-temperature long-range ferrimagnetic order in this 2D π-electron system can be realized, the work would provide a chemically tunable organic platform combining half-metallicity, compensated magnetism, and topological transport properties relevant to spintronics. The DFT-plus-Hubbard approach for extracting magnetic interactions and bands in nanographene systems is a standard and appropriate methodology in the field, and the concrete molecular design offers falsifiable predictions for bands and AHE.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that intermolecular exchange couplings of ~50 meV 'ensures room temperature stability' is not supported by the reported details. The manuscript states that out-of-plane magnetization opens an SOC gap of only tens of mK, implying a magnetic anisotropy energy per cell of order 0.001–0.01 meV. For a 2D honeycomb ferrimagnet with J/MAE ≳ 10^3–10^4, renormalization-group analyses show that true long-range order is either absent or occurs at a temperature far below the mean-field scale J/k_B ≈ 580 K due to Mermin-Wagner fluctuations; the bare J value alone therefore does not establish the room-temperature prediction.
minor comments (3)
  1. No error bars, k-point convergence tests, or explicit Hubbard U value are reported for the extracted 50 meV couplings, limiting assessment of numerical robustness.
  2. The explicit form of the Hubbard model Hamiltonian and the precise mapping procedure used to obtain the exchange couplings (e.g., total-energy differences or spin-wave analysis) should be stated.
  3. [Abstract] The term 'singular flat band' is introduced without definition or citation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and insightful review of our manuscript. The major comment raises a valid point about the limitations of our room-temperature stability claim in light of 2D fluctuation effects, which we address directly below by agreeing to revise the relevant statements.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that intermolecular exchange couplings of ~50 meV 'ensures room temperature stability' is not supported by the reported details. The manuscript states that out-of-plane magnetization opens an SOC gap of only tens of mK, implying a magnetic anisotropy energy per cell of order 0.001–0.01 meV. For a 2D honeycomb ferrimagnet with J/MAE ≳ 10^3–10^4, renormalization-group analyses show that true long-range order is either absent or occurs at a temperature far below the mean-field scale J/k_B ≈ 580 K due to Mermin-Wagner fluctuations; the bare J value alone therefore does not establish the room-temperature prediction.

    Authors: We agree that the original abstract wording overstates the case. The exchange coupling of ~50 meV sets a high mean-field energy scale (J/k_B ≈ 580 K), but the small SOC-induced anisotropy (MAE ~0.001–0.01 meV per cell) implies that Mermin-Wagner fluctuations will suppress true long-range order to a temperature well below this scale. In the revised manuscript we will modify the abstract to state that the large intermolecular exchange couplings indicate the potential for high-temperature magnetic order rather than ensuring room-temperature stability. We will also add a concise discussion paragraph acknowledging the role of 2D fluctuations, noting that the actual ordering temperature depends on the weak anisotropy and may require additional mechanisms (such as weak pinning or finite-size effects) for stabilization, while preserving the main results on the half-metallic bands and exchange parameters. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is forward computation from DFT+Hubbard

full rationale

The paper maps DFT results to a Hubbard model to extract intermolecular exchange couplings J (~50 meV) and then predicts room-temperature stability and half-metallicity from those values. This is a standard first-principles workflow with no parameter fitting to the target properties, no self-definitional loops, and no load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claims to unverified inputs. The small SOC gap and 2D ordering concerns are separate correctness issues, not circularity. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the accuracy of DFT for molecular electronic structure and the Hubbard model for deriving exchange couplings from those inputs; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • Hubbard U parameter
    On-site repulsion strength chosen for pi-electrons in the nanographenes; typical literature value but not numerically specified in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Density functional theory plus Hubbard model sufficiently captures the magnetic interactions and band structure of the proposed molecular system
    Invoked to obtain the 50 meV exchange couplings and half-metallic bands from the molecular geometry.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5539 in / 1434 out tokens · 68443 ms · 2026-05-15T20:52:46.356991+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ∗ On permanent leave from Departamento de F´ ısica Apli- cada, Universidad de Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain

    The authors acknowledge the use of computer time at MareNostrum 5 (Barcelona Supercomputing Centre) provided through FCT grant 2025.00090.CPCA.A2. ∗ On permanent leave from Departamento de F´ ısica Apli- cada, Universidad de Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain. † jan.phillips@inl.int

  2. [2]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B102, 014422 (2020)

  3. [3]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Phys. Rev. B 102, 144441 (2020)

  4. [4]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 014409 (2021)

  5. [5]

    J. Dong, K. Wu, M. Zhu, F. Zheng, X. Li, and J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B112, 024425 (2025)

  6. [6]

    Jungwirth, X

    T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich, Nature nanotechnology11, 231 (2016)

  7. [7]

    J. Dong, X. Li, G. Gurung, M. Zhu, P. Zhang, F. Zheng, E. Y. Tsymbal, and J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 197201 (2022)

  8. [8]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Phys. Rev. X12, 011028 (2022)

  9. [9]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

  10. [10]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

  11. [11]

    R. A. de Groot, F. M. Mueller, P. G. v. Engen, and K. H. J. Buschow, Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 2024 (1983)

  12. [12]

    R. A. de Groot, Physica B: Condensed Matter172, 45 (1991)

  13. [13]

    W. E. Pickett, Phys. Rev. B57, 10613 (1998)

  14. [14]

    Galanakis, P

    I. Galanakis, P. H. Dederichs, and N. Papanikolaou, Phys. Rev. B66, 174429 (2002)

  15. [15]

    ˇZelezn` y, P

    J. ˇZelezn` y, P. Wadley, K. Olejn´ ık, A. Hoffmann, and H. Ohno, Nature Physics14, 220 (2018)

  16. [16]

    Finley and L

    J. Finley and L. Liu, Applied Physics Letters116, 110501 (2020)

  17. [17]

    Zhou and F

    Y. Zhou and F. Liu, Nano Letters21, 230 (2020)

  18. [18]

    Mishra, D

    S. Mishra, D. Beyer, K. Eimre, J. Liu, R. Berger, O. Groning, C. A. Pignedoli, K. M¨ ullen, R. Fasel, X. Feng,et al., Journal of the American Chemical So- ciety141, 10621 (2019)

  19. [19]

    J. Li, S. Sanz, J. Castro-Esteban, M. Vilas-Varela, N. Friedrich, T. Frederiksen, D. Pe˜ na, and J. I. Pascual, Physical Review Letters124, 177201 (2020)

  20. [20]

    Mishra, D

    S. Mishra, D. Beyer, K. Eimre, R. Ortiz, J. Fern´ andez- Rossier, R. Berger, O. Gr¨ oning, C. A. Pignedoli, R. Fasel, X. Feng, and P. Ruffieux, Angewandte Chemie132, 12139 (2020)

  21. [21]

    Mishra, D

    S. Mishra, D. Beyer, K. Eimre, S. Kezilebieke, R. Berger, O. Gr¨ oning, C. A. Pignedoli, K. M¨ ullen, P. Liljeroth, P. Ruffieux,et al., Nature nanotechnology15, 22 (2020). 6

  22. [22]

    Ortiz and J

    R. Ortiz and J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, Progress in Surface Science95, 100595 (2020)

  23. [23]

    Turco, A

    E. Turco, A. Bernhardt, N. Krane, L. Valenta, R. Fasel, M. Juri´ ıcˇ cek, and P. Ruffieux, JACS Au3, 1358 (2023)

  24. [24]

    Mishra, X

    S. Mishra, X. Yao, Q. Chen, K. Eimre, O. Gr¨ oning, R. Ortiz, M. Di Giovannantonio, J. C. Sancho-Garc´ ıa, J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, C. A. Pignedoli,et al., Nature chemistry13, 581 (2021)

  25. [25]

    Mishra, G

    S. Mishra, G. Catarina, F. Wu, R. Ortiz, D. Jacob, K. Eimre, J. Ma, C. A. Pignedoli, X. Feng, P. Ruffieux, et al., Nature598, 287 (2021)

  26. [26]

    Hieulle, S

    J. Hieulle, S. Castro, N. Friedrich, A. Vegliante, F. R. Lara, S. Sanz, D. Rey, M. Corso, T. Frederiksen, J. I. Pascual,et al., Angewandte Chemie International Edi- tion60, 25224 (2021)

  27. [27]

    T. Wang, A. Berdonces-Layunta, N. Friedrich, M. Vilas- Varela, J. P. Calupitan, J. I. Pascual, D. Pe˜ na, D. Casanova, M. Corso, and D. G. de Oteyza, Journal of the American Chemical Society144, 4522 (2022)

  28. [28]

    Cheng, Z

    S. Cheng, Z. Xue, C. Li, Y. Liu, L. Xiang, Y. Ke, K. Yan, S. Wang, and P. Yu, Nature communications13, 1705 (2022)

  29. [29]

    Yu and T

    H. Yu and T. Heine, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.17264 (2025)

  30. [30]

    Yu and T

    H. Yu and T. Heine, J.Am. Chem. Soc.145, 19303 (2023)

  31. [31]

    H. Yu, Y. Jing, and T. Heine, Accounts of Chem- ical Research58, 61 (2025), pMID: 39656556, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.4c00557

  32. [32]

    K. N. Anindya and A. Rochefort, Carbon Trends7, 100170 (2022)

  33. [33]

    Ortiz, K

    R. Ortiz, K. Struty´ nski, and M. Melle-Franco, 2D Mate- rials13, 015023 (2026)

  34. [34]

    J. Cai, P. Ruffieux, R. Jaafar, M. Bieri, T. Braun, S. Blankenburg, M. Muoth, A. P. Seitsonen, M. Saleh, X. Feng,et al., Nature466, 470 (2010)

  35. [35]

    Moreno, M

    C. Moreno, M. Vilas-Varela, B. Kretz, A. Garcia- Lekue, M. V. Costache, M. Paradinas, M. Panighel, G. Ceballos, S. O. Valenzuela, D. Pe˜ na, and A. Mugarza, Science360, 199 (2018), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aar2009

  36. [36]

    S. Song, J. Su, M. Telychko, J. Li, G. Li, Y. Li, C. Su, J. Wu, and J. Lu, Chem. Soc. Rev.50, 3238 (2021)

  37. [37]

    Pavliˇ cek, A

    N. Pavliˇ cek, A. Mistry, Z. Majzik, N. Moll, G. Meyer, D. J. Fox, and L. Gross, Nature Nanotechnology12, 308 (2017)

  38. [38]

    J. Su, M. Telychko, P. Hu, G. Macam, P. Mutombo, H. Zhang, Y. Bao, F. Cheng, Z.-Q. Huang, Z. Qiu,et al., Science advances5, eaav7717 (2019)

  39. [39]

    Mishra, K

    S. Mishra, K. Xu, K. Eimre, H. Komber, J. Ma, C. A. Pignedoli, R. Fasel, X. Feng, and P. Ruffieux, Nanoscale 13, 1624 (2021)

  40. [40]

    Delgado, C

    A. Delgado, C. Dusold, J. Jiang, A. Cronin, S. G. Louie, and F. R. Fischer, Evidence for excitonic insu- lator ground state in triangulene Kagome lattice (2023), arXiv:2301.06171

  41. [41]

    Pawlak, K

    R. Pawlak, K. N. Anindya, O. Chahib, J.-C. Liu, P. Hiret, L. Marot, V. Luzet, F. Palmino, F. Ch´ erioux, A. Rochefort, and E. Meyer, ACS Nano19, 4768 (2025), pMID: 39793973, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c15519

  42. [42]

    Catarina, J

    G. Catarina, J. C. G. Henriques, A. Molina-S´ anchez, A. T. Costa, and J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043226 (2023)

  43. [43]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. D. Jr, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, F. Giustino, T. Gorni, J. Jia, M. Kawa- mura, H.-Y. Ko, A. Kokalj, E. K¨ u¸...

  44. [44]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S. S...

  45. [45]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Baseggio, P. Bonf` a, D. Brunato, R. Car, I. Carnimeo, C. Cavazzoni, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, F. Ferrari Ruffino, A. Ferretti, N. Marzari, I. Timrov, A. Urru, and S. Baroni, The Journal of Chemical Physics 152, 154105 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0005082

  46. [46]

    D. R. Hamann, M. Schl¨ uter, and C. Chiang, Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 1494 (1979)

  47. [47]

    Troullier and J

    N. Troullier and J. L. Martins, Phys. Rev. B43, 1993 (1991)

  48. [48]

    van Setten, M

    M. van Setten, M. Giantomassi, E. Bousquet, M. Ver- straete, D. Hamann, X. Gonze, and G.-M. Rignanese, Computer Physics Communications226, 39–54 (2018)

  49. [49]

    D. R. Hamann, Phys. Rev. B88, 085117 (2013)

  50. [50]

    K. F. Garrity, J. W. Bennett, K. M. Rabe, and D. Van- derbilt, Computational Materials Science81, 446 (2014)

  51. [51]

    Castelli, Stewart J

    K. Lejaeghere, G. Bihlmayer, T. Bj¨ orkman, P. Blaha, S. Bl¨ ugel, V. Blum, D. Caliste, I. E. Castelli, S. J. Clark, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, T. Deutsch, J. K. Dewhurst, I. D. Marco, C. Draxl, M. Du lak, O. Eriks- son, J. A. Flores-Livas, K. F. Garrity, L. Genovese, P. Giannozzi, M. Giantomassi, S. Goedecker, X. Gonze, O. Gr˚ an¨ as, E. K. U. Gross, ...

  52. [52]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakat- suji, and T. Jungwirth, Nature Reviews Materials7, 482 (2022)

  53. [53]

    C. Wu, D. Bergman, L. Balents, and S. D. Sarma, Phys- ical review letters99, 070401 (2007)

  54. [54]

    Zhang, Y

    G.-F. Zhang, Y. Li, and C. Wu, Physical Review B90, 075114 (2014). 7

  55. [55]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Physical review letters95, 226801 (2005)

  56. [56]

    H. Min, J. Hill, N. A. Sinitsyn, B. Sahu, L. Kleinman, and A. H. MacDonald, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics74, 165310 (2006)

  57. [57]

    Fukui, Y

    T. Fukui, Y. Hatsugai, and H. Suzuki, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan74, 1674 (2005)

  58. [58]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Reviews of modern physics 82, 3045 (2010)

  59. [59]

    M. V. Berry, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences392, 45 (1984)

  60. [60]

    Chang, J

    C.-Z. Chang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, J. Shen, Z. Zhang, M. Guo, K. Li, Y. Ou, P. Wei, L.-L. Wang, Z.-Q. Ji, Y. Feng, S. Ji, X. Chen, J. Jia, X. Dai, Z. Fang, S.-C. Zhang, K. He, Y. Wang, L. Lu, X.-C. Ma, and Q.-K. Xue, Science340, 167 (2013)

  61. [61]

    L. H. M. Barbosa, R. B. Muniz, A. T. Costa, and J. Mathon, Phys. Rev. B63, 174401 (2001)

  62. [62]

    Costa, N

    M. Costa, N. M. R. Peres, J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, and A. T. Costa, Phys. Rev. B102, 014450 (2020)

  63. [63]

    Henriques, D

    J. Henriques, D. Jacob, A. Molina-S´ anchez, G. Cata- rina, A. T. Costa, and J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, Nano Letters24, 12928 (2024), pMID: 39374927, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c03416

  64. [64]

    A. T. Costa, J. C. G. Henriques, and J. Fern´ andez- Rossier, SciPost Phys.18, 125 (2025)

  65. [65]

    J. C. G. Henriques and J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, Phys. Rev. B108, 155423 (2023)

  66. [66]

    A. Fert, R. Ramesh, V. Garcia, F. Casanova, and M. Bibes, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 015005 (2024)

  67. [67]

    Tersoff and D

    J. Tersoff and D. R. Hamann, Phys. Rev. B31, 805 (1985)

  68. [68]

    Schweflinghaus, M

    B. Schweflinghaus, M. dos Santos Dias, A. T. Costa, and S. Lounis, Phys. Rev. B89, 235439 (2014)

  69. [69]

    Jacob and J

    D. Jacob and J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, Physical Review B 106, 205405 (2022). SUPPLEMENT AR Y MA TERIAL DFT Density Functional Theory (DFT) results were ob- tained using theQUANTUM ESPRESSOpackage [42– 44]. We used norm-conserving pseudopotentials[45–50]. The plane-wave energy cutoff of was converged to a value of 70 Ry for the wave functions and 280 Ry for ...