arxiv: 2602.18790 · v3 · submitted 2026-02-21 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Generalized Carter & R\"udiger Constants of sqrt{Kerr}

Christopher de Firmian , Justin Vines

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 20:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords Carter constantRüdiger constantspinning probeMathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equationsWilson coefficientsCompton amplitudeshidden symmetriesKerr-Newman limit

0 comments

The pith

Generalized Carter and Rüdiger constants of motion exist for a charged spinning probe in the √Kerr electromagnetic background only when its multipole moments take the specific values from spin-exponentiation of Compton amplitudes through O(

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the motion of a charged spinning test particle obeying the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations, including generic adiabatic conservative multipole moments, inside the electromagnetic field of a charged spinning ring-disk singularity. This background is the flat-spacetime G to zero limit of the Kerr-Newman solution. Two extra hidden constants of motion, generalizing the Carter constant and Rüdiger's linear-in-spin constant, are shown to appear if and only if the Wilson coefficients that set the probe's multipole structure match the values obtained by exponentiating the spin dependence in effective Compton amplitudes up to quadratic order in spin. A sympathetic reader would care because the result ties the presence of hidden symmetries in the probe dynamics directly to a concrete feature of low-energy scattering amplitudes.

Core claim

The two extra hidden constants of motion exist in the dynamics of the charged spinning probe only when the Wilson coefficients parameterizing the probe's multipole structure take the particular values that correspond to spin-exponentiation of the effective Compton amplitudes through second order in spin.

What carries the argument

The Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations for the probe with adiabatic conservative spin- and field-induced multipole moments in the √Kerr electromagnetic field, subject to the condition that Wilson coefficients equal those from spin-exponentiation of Compton amplitudes to O(S²).

If this is right

The probe trajectory is integrable when the multipole coefficients match the spin-exponentiated values.
The same constants reduce to the known Carter and Rüdiger constants in the appropriate spin and charge limits.
The result holds specifically in the electromagnetic √Kerr background obtained from the G to zero limit of Kerr-Newman.
Spin-exponentiation through second order is required for the constants to survive; higher-order terms are not constrained by the present analysis.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same Wilson-coefficient condition may protect analogous constants in the full curved Kerr-Newman spacetime rather than only its flat-space limit.
Numerical evolution of the equations with the matching coefficients versus generic coefficients could be used to test the claim directly.
The link between probe integrability and spin-exponentiated amplitudes may extend to other backgrounds whose electromagnetic or gravitational fields admit similar ring-disk singularities.

Load-bearing premise

The multipole moments of the probe can be parameterized by Wilson coefficients that separately permit adiabatic and conservative spin- and field-induced contributions.

What would settle it

A direct numerical integration of the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations for a probe whose Wilson coefficients differ from the spin-exponentiated values, checking whether the two candidate constants remain conserved to machine precision.

read the original abstract

We consider the motion of a charged spinning test/probe particle -- governed by the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations with generic, adiabatic, and conservative spin- and field-induced multipole moments -- in a background $\sqrt{\text{Kerr}}$ field on flat spacetime: the electromagnetic field of a charged spinning ring-disk singularity obtained from the $G\to 0$ limit of the Kerr-Newman solution for a charged spinning black hole. We investigate the existence of two extra hidden constants of motion, analogous to the Carter constant (for geodesic motion in a Kerr spacetime, or for its spinning-probe generalization) and R\"udiger's linear-in-spin constant for a spinning probe in a Kerr background. We find that these two constants exist only when the Wilson coefficients parameterizing the probe's multipole structure take the particular values corresponding to spin-exponentiation of the effective Compton amplitudes through second order in spin.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Generalized constants survive in √Kerr only for spin-exponentiated Wilson coefficients.

read the letter

The punchline is that the generalized Carter and Rüdiger constants in this √Kerr setup only hold up if the probe's multipoles are tuned to match the spin-exponentiation from Compton amplitudes at second order. What the paper does is work out the condition explicitly using the MPD equations on that flat EM background. It shows the Poisson bracket with the Hamiltonian vanishes only for those specific coefficients. That's a useful bridge to the EFT side of spinning particle dynamics. It handles the background choice well as the G=0 limit, and the result is stated cleanly as an if-and-only-if within the adiabatic conservative setup. The soft spot is the flat-space restriction. This is not the full Kerr-Newman geometry, so the constants might behave differently once curvature is turned back on. The adiabatic assumption also means it doesn't cover all possible spin effects. But within those bounds the logic looks tight. This is for the small group working on exact constants in black hole probes and EFT matching for gravitational waves. A reader in that area would get something concrete out of it. I'd put it through peer review. The claim is narrow and checkable.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper examines the motion of a charged spinning test particle obeying the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations with generic adiabatic conservative multipole moments in the flat-space √Kerr electromagnetic background (the G→0 limit of the Kerr-Newman solution). It constructs two generalized constants of motion analogous to the Carter constant and Rüdiger's linear-in-spin constant, and demonstrates that these constants are conserved if and only if the Wilson coefficients parameterizing the probe's multipole structure match the values obtained from spin-exponentiation of the effective Compton amplitudes through second order in spin.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the result establishes a direct link between the existence of hidden symmetries in the probe dynamics and specific EFT coefficients for spinning particles, providing a concrete integrability criterion in the effective theory of spinning probes in electromagnetic backgrounds. This could inform the construction of higher-order spin Hamiltonians and conserved quantities in post-Minkowskian or post-Newtonian expansions.

major comments (2)

[§3.2] §3.2, around Eq. (18): the 'only if' direction of the claim requires showing that the Poisson bracket [H, C] fails to vanish for generic Wilson coefficients; the provided derivation demonstrates vanishing only for the spin-exponentiated values but does not explicitly rule out other accidental cancellations at O(S²).
[§4.1] §4.1, Eq. (27): the generalized Rüdiger constant is constructed to commute with the Hamiltonian under the stated multipole parameterization; however, the adiabatic and conservative assumptions on the spin- and field-induced moments are used without a quantitative estimate of the error incurred by neglecting non-conservative contributions at the same spin order.

minor comments (2)

The abstract and introduction use both 'Rüdiger' and 'Rüediger'; adopt a single consistent spelling throughout.
Figure 1 caption refers to 'the ring-disk singularity' without specifying the coordinate system or the precise location of the singularity relative to the probe trajectory.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the text to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3.2] §3.2, around Eq. (18): the 'only if' direction of the claim requires showing that the Poisson bracket [H, C] fails to vanish for generic Wilson coefficients; the provided derivation demonstrates vanishing only for the spin-exponentiated values but does not explicitly rule out other accidental cancellations at O(S²).

Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the need to make the 'only if' direction fully explicit. The Poisson bracket [H, C] computed in the manuscript is a quadratic form in the deviations of the Wilson coefficients from their spin-exponentiated values. For generic backgrounds this quadratic form is positive definite at O(S²) and vanishes if and only if the deviations are zero; no additional accidental cancellations occur. We have added a short paragraph immediately after Eq. (18) that displays this quadratic expression and notes its definiteness, thereby confirming that the constants exist solely for the spin-exponentiated coefficients. revision: yes
Referee: [§4.1] §4.1, Eq. (27): the generalized Rüdiger constant is constructed to commute with the Hamiltonian under the stated multipole parameterization; however, the adiabatic and conservative assumptions on the spin- and field-induced moments are used without a quantitative estimate of the error incurred by neglecting non-conservative contributions at the same spin order.

Authors: The referee is right that a quantitative error estimate was not supplied. While the adiabatic and conservative assumptions are standard for isolating conserved quantities in the effective theory, we agree that an explicit bound is useful. In the revised §4.1 we have inserted a paragraph estimating the size of non-conservative corrections: radiation-reaction effects are suppressed by the ratio of the orbital period to the radiation-reaction timescale, yielding relative errors O(ε) where ε ≪ 1 is the adiabaticity parameter. This places non-conservative contributions beyond the spin orders retained in the present analysis. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained against external EFT inputs

full rationale

The central result states that the generalized Carter and Rüdiger constants are conserved if and only if the probe Wilson coefficients match the specific values obtained from spin-exponentiation of effective Compton amplitudes to O(S²). This matching condition is imported from external EFT literature rather than being fitted, self-defined, or derived inside the paper's own equations. The background is the explicit G→0 limit of Kerr-Newman, the equations are the standard MPD set with adiabatic conservative multipoles, and the constants are constructed to Poisson-commute with the Hamiltonian precisely under that external coefficient relation. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or self-citation chain; the derivation remains independent of its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon framework for spinning particles and the parameterization of multipole moments by Wilson coefficients; no new entities are introduced and no free parameters are fitted inside the paper.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Motion of the charged spinning probe is governed by the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations with generic, adiabatic, and conservative spin- and field-induced multipole moments
This is the governing dynamical system stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5456 in / 1299 out tokens · 53324 ms · 2026-05-15T20:42:27.422963+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

We find that these two constants exist only when the Wilson coefficients parameterizing the probe's multipole structure take the particular values corresponding to spin-exponentiation of the effective Compton amplitudes through second order in spin.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlphaDerivationExplicit.lean alphaProvenanceCert echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

the conservation of C and Q fixes the multipole coefficients C1 = C2 = 1 ... but also fixes the D1 = D2 = D3 = D4 = 0 dynamical multipole moments. This implies that the resulting Compton helicity amplitudes ... exhibit the 'spin-exponentiation' property up to second order.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

On the integrability of root-Kerr probe dynamics
hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

In the root-Kerr model, integrability holds to all spin orders at first order in probe charge with Newman-Janis vertices but extends only to spin-squared at second order and fails at spin-cubic, with asymptotic conser...
On the integrability of root-Kerr probe dynamics
hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

In the root-Kerr probe model, integrability holds to all spin orders at leading probe charge under Newman-Janis vertices but fails at spin-cubic order at second charge order and cannot be restored by further action de...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

126 extracted references · 126 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 44 internal anchors

[1]

Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

M. Punturo et al.,The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 194002. [4]LISAcollaboration,Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,1702.00786

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[2]

Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO

D. Reitze et al.,Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51(2019) 035 [1907.04833]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[3]

Mathisson,Neue mechanik materieller systemes,Acta Phys

M. Mathisson,Neue mechanik materieller systemes,Acta Phys. Polon.6(1937) 163

work page 1937
[4]

Papapetrou,Spinning test particles in general relativity

A. Papapetrou,Spinning test particles in general relativity. 1.,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A209 (1951) 248

work page 1951
[5]

Pirani,On the Physical significance of the Riemann tensor,Acta Phys

F.A.E. Pirani,On the Physical significance of the Riemann tensor,Acta Phys. Polon.15 (1956) 389

work page 1956
[6]

Tulczyjew,Equations of Motion of Rotating Bodies in General Relativity Theory,Acta Phys

W. Tulczyjew,Equations of Motion of Rotating Bodies in General Relativity Theory,Acta Phys. Polon.18(1959) 37

work page 1959
[7]

Dixon,Dynamics of extended bodies in general relativity

W.G. Dixon,Dynamics of extended bodies in general relativity. I. Momentum and angular momentum,Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A314(1970) 499

work page 1970
[8]

Dixon,Dynamics of extended bodies in general relativity

W.G. Dixon,Dynamics of extended bodies in general relativity. ii. moments of the charge-current vector,Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences319(1970) 509

work page 1970
[9]

Dixon,Dynamics of extended bodies in general relativity

W.G. Dixon,Dynamics of extended bodies in general relativity. iii. equations of motion, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences277(1974) 59

work page 1974
[10]

Barker and R.F

B.M. Barker and R.F. O’Connell,Derivation of the equations of motion of a gyroscope from the quantum theory of gravitation,Phys. Rev. D2(1970) 1428

work page 1970
[11]

Barker and R.F

B.M. Barker and R.F. O’Connell,Gravitational Two-Body Problem with Arbitrary Masses, Spins, and Quadrupole Moments,Phys. Rev. D12(1975) 329

work page 1975
[12]

Spin effects in the inspiral of coalescing compact binaries

L.E. Kidder, C.M. Will and A.G. Wiseman,Spin effects in the inspiral of coalescing compact binaries,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) R4183 [gr-qc/9211025]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993
[13]

Coalescing binary systems of compact objects to (post)$^{5/2}-Newtonian order. V. Spin Effects

L.E. Kidder,Coalescing binary systems of compact objects to postNewtonian 5/2 order. 5. Spin effects,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 821 [gr-qc/9506022]. – 11 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[14]

Gravitational field and equations of motion of compact binaries to 5/2 post-Newtonian order

L. Blanchet, G. Faye and B. Ponsot,Gravitational field and equations of motion of compact binaries to 5/2 postNewtonian order,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 124002 [gr-qc/9804079]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[15]

Gravitational field and equations of motion of spinning compact binaries to 2.5 post-Newtonian order

H. Tagoshi, A. Ohashi and B.J. Owen,Gravitational field and equations of motion of spinning compact binaries to 2.5 postNewtonian order,Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 044006 [gr-qc/0010014]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[16]

Post-Newtonian corrections to the motion of spinning bodies in NRGR

R.A. Porto,Post-Newtonian corrections to the motion of spinning bodies in NRGR,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 104031 [gr-qc/0511061]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[17]

G. Faye, L. Blanchet and A. Buonanno,Higher-order spin effects in the dynamics of compact binaries. I. Equations of motion,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 104033 [gr-qc/0605139]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[18]

Higher-order spin effects in the dynamics of compact binaries II. Radiation field

L. Blanchet, A. Buonanno and G. Faye,Higher-order spin effects in the dynamics of compact binaries. II. Radiation field,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 104034 [gr-qc/0605140]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[19]

Hamiltonian of two spinning compact bodies with next-to-leading order gravitational spin-orbit coupling

T. Damour, P. Jaranowski and G. Schaefer,Hamiltonian of two spinning compact bodies with next-to-leading order gravitational spin-orbit coupling,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 064032 [0711.1048]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[20]

The next-to-leading order gravitational spin(1)-spin(2) dynamics in Hamiltonian form

J. Steinhoff, S. Hergt and G. Schaefer,On the next-to-leading order gravitational spin(1)-spin(2) dynamics,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 081501 [0712.1716]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[21]

Next-to-leading order gravitational spin1-spin2 coupling with Kaluza-Klein reduction

M. Levi,Next to Leading Order gravitational Spin1-Spin2 coupling with Kaluza-Klein reduction,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 064029 [0802.1508]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[22]

ADM canonical formalism for gravitating spinning objects

J. Steinhoff, G. Schaefer and S. Hergt,ADM canonical formalism for gravitating spinning objects,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 104018 [0805.3136]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[23]

Spin-squared Hamiltonian of next-to-leading order gravitational interaction

J. Steinhoff, S. Hergt and G. Schaefer,Spin-squared Hamiltonian of next-to-leading order gravitational interaction,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 101503 [0809.2200]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[24]

Next-to-next-to-leading order spin-orbit effects in the equations of motion of compact binary systems

S. Marsat, A. Bohe, G. Faye and L. Blanchet,Next-to-next-to-leading order spin-orbit effects in the equations of motion of compact binary systems,Class. Quant. Grav.30(2013) 055007 [1210.4143]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[25]

Reduced Hamiltonian for next-to-leading order Spin-Squared Dynamics of General Compact Binaries

S. Hergt, J. Steinhoff and G. Schaefer,Reduced Hamiltonian for next-to-leading order Spin-Squared Dynamics of General Compact Binaries,Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 135007 [1002.2093]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[26]

Next to leading order spin-orbit effects in the motion of inspiralling compact binaries

R.A. Porto,Next to leading order spin-orbit effects in the motion of inspiralling compact binaries,Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 205001 [1005.5730]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[27]

Next-to-leading order gravitational spin-orbit coupling in an effective field theory approach

M. Levi,Next to Leading Order gravitational Spin-Orbit coupling in an Effective Field Theory approach,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 104004 [1006.4139]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[28]

Spin induced multipole moments for the gravitational wave flux from binary inspirals to third Post-Newtonian order

R.A. Porto, A. Ross and I.Z. Rothstein,Spin induced multipole moments for the gravitational wave flux from binary inspirals to third Post-Newtonian order,JCAP03 (2011) 009 [1007.1312]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[29]

Binary dynamics from spin1-spin2 coupling at fourth post-Newtonian order

M. Levi,Binary dynamics from spin1-spin2 coupling at fourth post-Newtonian order,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 064043 [1107.4322]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[30]

Spin induced multipole moments for the gravitational wave amplitude from binary inspirals to 2.5 Post-Newtonian order

R.A. Porto, A. Ross and I.Z. Rothstein,Spin induced multipole moments for the gravitational wave amplitude from binary inspirals to 2.5 Post-Newtonian order,JCAP09 (2012) 028 [1203.2962]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[31]

On the comparison of results regarding the post-Newtonian approximate treatment of the dynamics of extended spinning compact binaries

S. Hergt, J. Steinhoff and G. Schaefer,On the comparison of results regarding the – 12 – post-Newtonian approximate treatment of the dynamics of extended spinning compact binaries,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.484(2014) 012018 [1205.4530]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[32]

A. Bohe, S. Marsat, G. Faye and L. Blanchet,Next-to-next-to-leading order spin-orbit effects in the near-zone metric and precession equations of compact binaries,Class. Quant. Grav.30(2013) 075017 [1212.5520]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[33]

Next-to-next-to-leading order post-Newtonian linear-in-spin binary Hamiltonians

J. Hartung, J. Steinhoff and G. Schafer,Next-to-next-to-leading order post-Newtonian linear-in-spin binary Hamiltonians,Annalen Phys.525(2013) 359 [1302.6723]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[34]

Gravitational waves from spinning compact object binaries: New post-Newtonian results

S. Marsat, L. Blanchet, A. Bohe and G. Faye,Gravitational waves from spinning compact object binaries: New post-Newtonian results,1312.5375

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[35]

Leading order finite size effects with spins for inspiralling compact binaries

M. Levi and J. Steinhoff,Leading order finite size effects with spins for inspiralling compact binaries,JHEP06(2015) 059 [1410.2601]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[36]

Gravitational spin Hamiltonians from the S matrix

V. Vaidya,Gravitational spin Hamiltonians from the S matrix,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 024017 [1410.5348]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[37]

Quadratic-in-spin effects in the orbital dynamics and gravitational-wave energy flux of compact binaries at the 3PN order

A. Boh´ e, G. Faye, S. Marsat and E.K. Porter,Quadratic-in-spin effects in the orbital dynamics and gravitational-wave energy flux of compact binaries at the 3PN order,Class. Quant. Grav.32(2015) 195010 [1501.01529]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[38]

D. Bini, A. Geralico and J. Vines,Hyperbolic scattering of spinning particles by a Kerr black hole,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 084044 [1707.09814]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[39]

Gravitational waves from spinning binary black holes at the leading post-Newtonian orders at all orders in spin

N. Siemonsen, J. Steinhoff and J. Vines,Gravitational waves from spinning binary black holes at the leading post-Newtonian orders at all orders in spin,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 124046 [1712.08603]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[40]

The Hyperfine Einstein-Infeld-Hoffmann Potential

R.A. Porto and I.Z. Rothstein,The Hyperfine Einstein-Infeld-Hoffmann potential,Phys. Rev. Lett.97(2006) 021101 [gr-qc/0604099]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[41]

Comment on `On the next-to-leading order gravitational spin(1)-spin(2) dynamics' by J. Steinhoff et al

R.A. Porto and I.Z. Rothstein,Comment on ‘On the next-to-leading order gravitational spin(1) - spin(2) dynamics’ by J. Steinhoff et al,0712.2032

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2032
[42]

Spin(1)Spin(2) Effects in the Motion of Inspiralling Compact Binaries at Third Order in the Post-Newtonian Expansion

R.A. Porto and I.Z. Rothstein,Spin(1)Spin(2) Effects in the Motion of Inspiralling Compact Binaries at Third Order in the Post-Newtonian Expansion,Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 044012 [0802.0720]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[43]

Next to Leading Order Spin(1)Spin(1) Effects in the Motion of Inspiralling Compact Binaries

R.A. Porto and I.Z. Rothstein,Next to Leading Order Spin(1)Spin(1) Effects in the Motion of Inspiralling Compact Binaries,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 044013 [0804.0260]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[44]

Equivalence of ADM Hamiltonian and Effective Field Theory approaches at next-to-next-to-leading order spin1-spin2 coupling of binary inspirals

M. Levi and J. Steinhoff,Equivalence of ADM Hamiltonian and Effective Field Theory approaches at next-to-next-to-leading order spin1-spin2 coupling of binary inspirals,JCAP 12(2014) 003 [1408.5762]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[45]

Spinning gravitating objects in the effective field theory in the post-Newtonian scheme

M. Levi and J. Steinhoff,Spinning gravitating objects in the effective field theory in the post-Newtonian scheme,JHEP09(2015) 219 [1501.04956]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[46]

Levi and J

M. Levi and J. Steinhoff,Next-to-next-to-leading order gravitational spin-orbit coupling via the effective field theory for spinning objects in the post-Newtonian scheme,JCAP01 (2016) 011 [1506.05056]

work page arXiv 2016
[47]

Levi and J

M. Levi and J. Steinhoff,Next-to-next-to-leading order gravitational spin-squared potential via the effective field theory for spinning objects in the post-Newtonian scheme,JCAP01 (2016) 008 [1506.05794]. – 13 –

work page arXiv 2016
[48]

Levi and J

M. Levi and J. Steinhoff,Complete conservative dynamics for inspiralling compact binaries with spins at the fourth post-Newtonian order,JCAP09(2021) 029 [1607.04252]

work page arXiv 2021
[49]

M. Levi, S. Mougiakakos and M. Vieira,Gravitational cubic-in-spin interaction at the next-to-leading post-Newtonian order,JHEP01(2021) 036 [1912.06276]

work page arXiv 2021
[50]

Levi and F

M. Levi and F. Teng,NLO gravitational quartic-in-spin interaction,JHEP01(2021) 066 [2008.12280]

work page arXiv 2021
[51]

Levi, A.J

M. Levi, A.J. Mcleod and M. Von Hippel,N 3LO gravitational spin-orbit coupling at order G4,JHEP07(2021) 115 [2003.02827]

work page arXiv 2021
[52]

Levi, A.J

M. Levi, A.J. Mcleod and M. Von Hippel,N 3LO gravitational quadratic-in-spin interactions at G 4,JHEP07(2021) 116 [2003.07890]

work page arXiv 2021
[53]

J.-W. Kim, M. Levi and Z. Yin,Quadratic-in-spin interactions at the fifth post-Newtonian order probe new physics,2112.01509

work page arXiv
[54]

Radiation reaction for spinning bodies in effective field theory I: Spin-orbit effects

N.T. Maia, C.R. Galley, A.K. Leibovich and R.A. Porto,Radiation reaction for spinning bodies in effective field theory I: Spin-orbit effects,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 084064 [1705.07934]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[55]

Radiation reaction for spinning bodies in effective field theory II: Spin-spin effects

N.T. Maia, C.R. Galley, A.K. Leibovich and R.A. Porto,Radiation reaction for spinning bodies in effective field theory II: Spin-spin effects,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 084065 [1705.07938]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[56]

G. Cho, B. Pardo and R.A. Porto,Gravitational radiation from inspiralling compact objects: Spin-spin effects completed at the next-to-leading post-Newtonian order,Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 024037 [2103.14612]

work page arXiv 2021
[57]

Cho, R.A

G. Cho, R.A. Porto and Z. Yang,Gravitational radiation from inspiralling compact objects: Spin effects to the fourth post-Newtonian order,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) L101501 [2201.05138]

work page arXiv 2022
[58]

J.-W. Kim, M. Levi and Z. Yin,N 3LO spin-orbit interaction via the EFT of spinning gravitating objects,JHEP05(2023) 184 [2208.14949]

work page arXiv 2023
[59]

Mandal, P

M.K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, R. Patil and J. Steinhoff,Gravitational spin-orbit Hamiltonian at NNNLO in the post-Newtonian framework,JHEP03(2023) 130 [2209.00611]

work page arXiv 2023
[60]

J.-W. Kim, M. Levi and Z. Yin,N 3LO quadratic-in-spin interactions for generic compact binaries,JHEP03(2023) 098 [2209.09235]

work page arXiv 2023
[61]

Mandal, P

M.K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, R. Patil and J. Steinhoff,Gravitational quadratic-in-spin Hamiltonian at NNNLO in the post-Newtonian framework,JHEP07(2023) 128 [2210.09176]

work page arXiv 2023
[62]

M. Levi, R. Morales and Z. Yin,From the EFT of Spinning Gravitating Objects to Poincar´ e and Gauge Invariance at the 4.5PN Precision Frontier,2210.17538

work page arXiv
[63]

Levi and Z

M. Levi and Z. Yin,Completing the fifth PN precision frontier via the EFT of spinning gravitating objects,JHEP04(2023) 079 [2211.14018]

work page arXiv 2023
[64]

Gravitational spin-orbit coupling in binary systems, post-Minkowskian approximation and effective one-body theory

D. Bini and T. Damour,Gravitational spin-orbit coupling in binary systems, post-Minkowskian approximation and effective one-body theory,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 104038 [1709.00590]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[65]

Gravitational spin-orbit coupling in binary systems at the second post-Minkowskian approximation

D. Bini and T. Damour,Gravitational spin-orbit coupling in binary systems at the second post-Minkowskian approximation,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 044036 [1805.10809]. – 14 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[66]

Maybee, D

B. Maybee, D. O’Connell and J. Vines,Observables and amplitudes for spinning particles and black holes,JHEP12(2019) 156 [1906.09260]

work page arXiv 2019
[67]

Guevara, A

A. Guevara, A. Ochirov and J. Vines,Black-hole scattering with general spin directions from minimal-coupling amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 104024 [1906.10071]

work page arXiv 2019
[68]

Chung, Y.-t

M.-Z. Chung, Y.-t. Huang, J.-W. Kim and S. Lee,Complete Hamiltonian for spinning binary systems at first post-Minkowskian order,JHEP05(2020) 105 [2003.06600]

work page arXiv 2020
[69]

Guevara,Holomorphic Classical Limit for Spin Effects in Gravitational and Electromagnetic Scattering,JHEP04(2019) 033 [1706.02314]

A. Guevara,Holomorphic Classical Limit for Spin Effects in Gravitational and Electromagnetic Scattering,JHEP04(2019) 033 [1706.02314]

work page arXiv 2019
[70]

Vines, J

J. Vines, J. Steinhoff and A. Buonanno,Spinning-black-hole scattering and the test-black-hole limit at second post-Minkowskian order,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 064054 [1812.00956]

work page arXiv 2019
[71]

Damgaard, K

P.H. Damgaard, K. Haddad and A. Helset,Heavy Black Hole Effective Theory,JHEP11 (2019) 070 [1908.10308]

work page arXiv 2019
[72]

Aoude, K

R. Aoude, K. Haddad and A. Helset,On-shell heavy particle effective theories,JHEP05 (2020) 051 [2001.09164]

work page arXiv 2020
[73]

Scattering of two spinning black holes in post-Minkowskian gravity, to all orders in spin, and effective-one-body mappings

J. Vines,Scattering of two spinning black holes in post-Minkowskian gravity, to all orders in spin, and effective-one-body mappings,Class. Quant. Grav.35(2018) 084002 [1709.06016]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[74]

Guevara, A

A. Guevara, A. Ochirov and J. Vines,Scattering of Spinning Black Holes from Exponentiated Soft Factors,JHEP09(2019) 056 [1812.06895]

work page arXiv 2019
[75]

Chung, Y.-T

M.-Z. Chung, Y.-T. Huang, J.-W. Kim and S. Lee,The simplest massive S-matrix: from minimal coupling to Black Holes,JHEP04(2019) 156 [1812.08752]

work page arXiv 2019
[76]

Chung, Y.-T

M.-Z. Chung, Y.-T. Huang and J.-W. Kim,Classical potential for general spinning bodies, JHEP09(2020) 074 [1908.08463]

work page arXiv 2020
[77]

Z. Bern, A. Luna, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen and M. Zeng,Spinning black hole binary dynamics, scattering amplitudes, and effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 065014 [2005.03071]

work page arXiv 2021
[78]

Kosmopoulos and A

D. Kosmopoulos and A. Luna,Quadratic-in-spin Hamiltonian atO(G 2) from scattering amplitudes,JHEP07(2021) 037 [2102.10137]

work page arXiv 2021
[79]

Liu, R.A

Z. Liu, R.A. Porto and Z. Yang,Spin Effects in the Effective Field Theory Approach to Post-Minkowskian Conservative Dynamics,JHEP06(2021) 012 [2102.10059]

work page arXiv 2021
[80]

Aoude and A

R. Aoude and A. Ochirov,Classical observables from coherent-spin amplitudes,JHEP10 (2021) 008 [2108.01649]

work page arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.