pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.20322 · v2 · pith:DES2ZFAOnew · submitted 2026-02-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · quant-ph

Equilibrium and dynamical quantum phase transitions in dipolar atomic Josephson junctions

Cesare Vianello , Giovanni Mazzarella , Luca Salasnich This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 11:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas quant-ph
keywords dipolar bosonsJosephson junctionpair tunnelingquantum phase transitionsNOON statesself-trappingBose-Hubbard modeldynamical quantum phase transitions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Pair tunneling in dipolar Josephson junctions induces ground-state parity modulations and reshapes quantum phase transitions to NOON states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how pair tunneling generated by dipolar interactions in a double-well system of bosons affects the equilibrium and dynamical properties of an atomic Josephson junction. Using an extended Bose-Hubbard model solved with mean-field theory and exact diagonalization, it shows that this correlated tunneling produces modulations in the ground-state parity and alters the phase diagram with qualitative changes in transitions to NOON and phase-NOON states plus shifts in critical points. Out of equilibrium the same term modifies conditions for macroscopic quantum self-trapping and gives rise to dynamical quantum phase transitions. A reader might care because these results reveal how one specific interaction term can qualitatively control phases and dynamics in a quantum many-body system that is experimentally accessible with ultracold atoms.

Core claim

In an atomic Josephson junction realized with dipolar bosons, the extended Bose-Hubbard model that includes dipolar-generated on-site interaction and nearest-neighbor pair tunneling leads to ground-state parity modulations and significantly reshapes the phase diagram, producing qualitative changes in the quantum phase transitions toward NOON and phase-NOON states as well as quantitative shifts of the critical points. Out of equilibrium, pair tunneling modifies the conditions for macroscopic quantum self-trapping and leads to the emergence of dynamical quantum phase transitions.

What carries the argument

Nearest-neighbor pair tunneling term in the extended Bose-Hubbard model for dipolar bosons in a double well, which is generated by the dipolar interactions and competes with single-particle tunneling and on-site repulsion.

If this is right

  • Ground states display parity modulations induced by the pair-tunneling term.
  • Quantum phase transitions toward NOON and phase-NOON states undergo qualitative changes.
  • Critical points in the equilibrium phase diagram shift by finite amounts.
  • Conditions for macroscopic quantum self-trapping are altered during dynamical evolution.
  • Dynamical quantum phase transitions appear in the out-of-equilibrium regime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the effect is confirmed, dipolar interactions could serve as a tunable knob for preparing entangled NOON states in quantum simulators.
  • Similar pair-tunneling corrections may appear in other long-range interacting lattice systems and change their transport properties.
  • The comparison between mean-field and exact results offers a benchmark for when mean-field approximations remain reliable in driven Josephson junctions.

Load-bearing premise

The extended Bose-Hubbard model with dipolar-generated on-site interaction and nearest-neighbor pair tunneling accurately represents the physical double-well system of dipolar bosons, and mean-field theory combined with exact diagonalization sufficiently captures the equilibrium and dynamical behavior.

What would settle it

An experiment with dipolar atoms in a double well that finds no ground-state parity modulations or no shift in the critical points for the quantum phase transition to NOON states would contradict the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.20322 by Cesare Vianello, Giovanni Mazzarella, Luca Salasnich.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

An atomic Josephson junction realized with dipolar bosons in a double-well potential can be described by an extended Bose-Hubbard model in which dipolar interactions generate an effective on-site interaction and nearest-neighbor pair tunneling. Using mean-field theory and exact diagonalization, we investigate how this correlated process affects zero-temperature equilibrium and dynamical properties of the system. In equilibrium, we show that pair tunneling induces ground-state parity modulations and significantly reshapes the phase diagram, producing qualitative changes in the quantum phase transitions toward NOON and phase-NOON states, as well as quantitative shifts of the critical points. Out of equilibrium, we demonstrate that it modifies the conditions for macroscopic quantum self-trapping, and assess its impact by comparing mean-field and fully quantum evolution, including the emergence of dynamical quantum phase transitions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies dipolar bosons in a double-well potential modeled by an extended Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian that incorporates dipolar-generated on-site interactions and nearest-neighbor pair tunneling. Using mean-field theory and exact diagonalization, it examines the effects of pair tunneling on zero-temperature equilibrium properties, including ground-state parity modulations and quantum phase transitions to NOON and phase-NOON states, as well as out-of-equilibrium dynamics such as modifications to macroscopic quantum self-trapping and the emergence of dynamical quantum phase transitions.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work shows that correlated pair tunneling can qualitatively reshape the phase diagram and dynamics in dipolar Josephson junctions, offering insights into how such processes influence quantum phase transitions and self-trapping in ultracold atomic systems. The combination of mean-field and exact diagonalization approaches provides a direct numerical exploration of the model.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2] §2 (model derivation): The two-site extended Bose-Hubbard truncation assumes rigid Wannier functions with higher orbitals integrated out perturbatively. When dipolar strength becomes comparable to the tunneling scale, excited-mode contributions to the interaction matrix elements are not renormalized, undermining the reported parity modulations and quantitative shifts of the NOON critical points; exact diagonalization on the truncated model cannot detect this.
  2. [§4] §4 (equilibrium phase diagram): The qualitative changes in quantum phase transitions toward NOON and phase-NOON states, including parity modulations, rest on the validity of the effective Hamiltonian; without explicit validation against multi-orbital corrections or known limits of the dipolar double-well, these load-bearing claims remain only moderately supported.
  3. [§5] §5 (dynamical properties): The modifications to macroscopic quantum self-trapping conditions and emergence of dynamical quantum phase transitions are demonstrated within the truncated model, but the same higher-mode concern applies, as the central claim requires the effective Hamiltonian to faithfully reproduce the low-energy spectrum.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §3] The abstract and main text lack explicit error bars, parameter ranges explored, or direct comparisons to known limits of the standard Bose-Hubbard model, which would strengthen the quantitative claims.
  2. [§2] Notation for the pair-tunneling term and dipolar interaction strength could be clarified with an explicit table of symbols and their physical units.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and insightful comments on our manuscript. We have addressed each of the major comments point by point below, providing clarifications on the model assumptions and offering revisions where appropriate to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §2 (model derivation): The two-site extended Bose-Hubbard truncation assumes rigid Wannier functions with higher orbitals integrated out perturbatively. When dipolar strength becomes comparable to the tunneling scale, excited-mode contributions to the interaction matrix elements are not renormalized, undermining the reported parity modulations and quantitative shifts of the NOON critical points; exact diagonalization on the truncated model cannot detect this.

    Authors: We acknowledge the importance of validating the single-band approximation in the presence of strong dipolar interactions. Our model derivation follows the standard perturbative integration of higher orbitals as commonly employed in studies of dipolar bosons in double-well potentials. The parity modulations arise directly from the pair-tunneling term in the effective Hamiltonian, which is derived under the assumption that the Wannier functions remain rigid. To address the referee's concern, we will revise the manuscript to include a more detailed discussion of the parameter regime where this approximation holds, specifically when the dipolar interaction strength does not exceed the energy gap to higher orbitals. We note that for the values considered in our phase diagrams, the reported effects are within the validity range. revision: partial

  2. Referee: §4 (equilibrium phase diagram): The qualitative changes in quantum phase transitions toward NOON and phase-NOON states, including parity modulations, rest on the validity of the effective Hamiltonian; without explicit validation against multi-orbital corrections or known limits of the dipolar double-well, these load-bearing claims remain only moderately supported.

    Authors: The qualitative changes in the phase diagram, such as the shifts in critical points for transitions to NOON states and the appearance of parity modulations, are direct consequences of the pair-tunneling term included in our extended Bose-Hubbard model. We have compared our mean-field results with exact diagonalization to confirm consistency within the model. While we do not perform a full multi-orbital calculation, we reference known limits from previous works on dipolar double-wells where similar truncations have been validated. In the revised version, we will add explicit comparisons to the non-dipolar case and discuss how the pair tunneling modifies the known phase boundaries. revision: partial

  3. Referee: §5 (dynamical properties): The modifications to macroscopic quantum self-trapping conditions and emergence of dynamical quantum phase transitions are demonstrated within the truncated model, but the same higher-mode concern applies, as the central claim requires the effective Hamiltonian to faithfully reproduce the low-energy spectrum.

    Authors: Similar to the equilibrium case, the dynamical properties including modifications to self-trapping and dynamical quantum phase transitions are studied using both mean-field and exact diagonalization within the effective model. The emergence of DQPTs is tied to the altered spectrum due to pair tunneling. We will include in the revision a note on the applicability to low-energy dynamics, emphasizing that for short-time dynamics or when higher modes are not excited, the model remains accurate. We agree to expand the discussion on the energy scales to better support the claims. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results obtained by direct numerical solution of defined extended Bose-Hubbard model

full rationale

The paper defines an extended Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian incorporating dipolar-generated on-site interactions and nearest-neighbor pair tunneling for a double-well system, then applies mean-field theory and exact diagonalization to extract equilibrium phase diagrams (including NOON and phase-NOON transitions) and dynamical features such as self-trapping and dynamical quantum phase transitions. These outputs follow from solving the model's equations for given parameters rather than any fitted quantity defined from the target observables, self-citation chains, or ansatz smuggled via prior work. The derivation chain remains self-contained and externally falsifiable via the stated numerical methods.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the assumption that the dipolar system maps onto an extended Bose-Hubbard model with pair tunneling; no independent evidence for this mapping beyond the model choice is provided in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • dipolar interaction strength
    Strength of dipolar terms that generate the pair tunneling is a tunable parameter in the model, likely chosen to explore different regimes.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Dipolar interactions in a double-well potential can be captured by an effective on-site interaction plus nearest-neighbor pair tunneling in the Bose-Hubbard framework.
    This mapping is invoked at the start of the model construction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5662 in / 1226 out tokens · 54810 ms · 2026-05-22T11:39:13.041306+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Decoding Equilibrium and Dynamical Criticality in the 2D Topological Order

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Microscopic fidelity zeros in the Wen-plaquette model reconstruct equilibrium topological boundaries and suppress dynamical quantum phase transitions by enforcing momentum exclusion and depleting decaying modes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 88 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    In this regime, in the large-Nlimit the two lowest-energy eigenstates are given by symmetric and antisymmetric superpositions of wave packets localized around the phase-imbalanced semiclas- sical ground states (±ϕs,0), namely|(ϕ s,0)⟩±|(−ϕ s,0)⟩. Deep in pair tunneling regime, Π≫ 1 2, these approach |( π 2 ,0)⟩±|(− π 2 ,0)⟩, which may be interpreted as sy...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Phase-locked MQST can occur for Λ>1 + Π or Λ< Λc =−1 + Π, while running-phase MQST can occur for Λ>2 + Π or Λ<−2 + Π, provided the initial conditions satisfy Λ> Π[1−(1−z 2

    work page

  3. [3]

    cos 2ϕ0]+2( p 1−z 2 0 cosϕ 0+1) z2 0 or Λ< Π[1−(1−z 2

    work page

  4. [4]

    The situation changes for Π> 1 2, where new phase- imbalanced fixed points appear at (±ϕs,0), that are sad- dles for Λ<−Π and minima for Λ>−Π

    cos 2ϕ0]+2( p 1−z 2 0 cosϕ 0 −1) z2 0 , (0≤Π≤ 1 2),(18) for repulsive and attractive interactions, respectively. The situation changes for Π> 1 2, where new phase- imbalanced fixed points appear at (±ϕs,0), that are sad- dles for Λ<−Π and minima for Λ>−Π. In the former case, Josephson oscillations can occur around the maximum at (0,0) even for negative in...

    work page

  5. [5]

    cos 2ϕ0]+2( p 1−z 2 0 cosϕ 0+1) z2 0 or Λ< −Π[1+(1−z 2

    work page

  6. [6]

    Frontiere Quantistiche

    cos 2ϕ0]+2( p 1−z 2 0 cosϕ 0 − 1 4Π) z2 0 , (Π> 1 2),(19) for repulsive and attractive interactions, respectively. Notice that for repulsive interactions, the condition is the same as in Eq. (18). B. Comparison with the quantum dynamics The mean-field dynamics described in Sec. IV A is ex- pected to accurately reproduce the quantum dynamics for largeNat f...

    work page

  7. [7]

    B. D. Josephson, Possible new effects in superconductive tunneling, Phys. Lett.1, 251 (1962)

    work page 1962

  8. [8]

    P. W. Anderson and J. M. Rowell, Probable observation of the Josephson superconducting tunneling effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.10, 230 (1963)

    work page 1963

  9. [9]

    Barone and G

    A. Barone and G. Patern` o,Physics and Applications of the Josephson Effect(John Wiley & Sons, London, 1982)

    work page 1982

  10. [10]

    Javanainen, Oscillatory exchange of atoms between traps containing Bose condensates, Phys

    J. Javanainen, Oscillatory exchange of atoms between traps containing Bose condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 3164 (1986)

    work page 1986

  11. [11]

    S. V. Pereverzev, A. Loshak, S. Backhaus, J. C. Davis, and R. E. Packard, Quantum oscillations between two weakly coupled reservoirs of superfluid 3He, Nature388, 449 (1997)

    work page 1997

  12. [12]

    Marchenkov, R

    A. Marchenkov, R. W. Simmonds, J. C. Davis, and R. E. Packard, Observation of the Josephson plasma mode for a superfluid, Phys. Rev. B61, 4196 (2000)

    work page 2000

  13. [13]

    Sukhatme, Y

    K. Sukhatme, Y. Mukharsky, T. Chui, and D. Pearson, Observation of the ideal Josephson effect in superfluid 4He, Nature411, 280 (2001)

    work page 2001

  14. [14]

    F. S. Cataliotti, S. Burger, C. Fort, P. Maddaloni, F. Mi- nardi, A. Trombettoni, A. Smerzi, and M. Inguscio, Josephson junction arrays with Bose-Einstein conden- sates, Science293, 843 (2001). 13

    work page 2001

  15. [15]

    Albiez, R

    M. Albiez, R. Gati, J. F¨ olling, S. Hunsmann, M. Cris- tiani, and M. K. Oberthaler, Direct observation of tunnel- ing and nonlinear self-trapping in a single bosonic Joseph- son junction, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 010402 (2005)

    work page 2005

  16. [16]

    S. Levy, E. Lahoud, I. Shomroni, and J. Steinhauer, The a.c. and d.c. Josephson effects in a Bose-Einstein conden- sate, Nature449, 579 (2007)

    work page 2007

  17. [17]

    K. G. Lagoudakis, B. Pietka, M. Wouters, R. Andr´ e, and B. Deveaud-Pl´ edran, Coherent oscillations in an exciton-polariton Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 120403 (2010)

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    Abbarchi, A

    M. Abbarchi, A. Amo, V. G. Sala, D. D. Solnyshkov, H. Flayac, L. Ferrier, I. Sagnes, E. Galopin, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, G. Malpuech, and J. Bloch, Macroscopic quantum self- trapping and Josephson oscillations of exciton polaritons, Nature Phys.9, 275 (2013)

    work page 2013

  19. [19]

    Valtolina, A

    G. Valtolina, A. Burchianti, A. Amico, E. Neri, K. Xhani, J. A. Seman, A. Trombettoni, A. Smerzi, M. Zaccanti, M. Inguscio, and G. Roati, Josephson effect in fermionic superfluids across the BEC-BCS crossover, Science350, 1505 (2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Spagnolli, G

    G. Spagnolli, G. Semeghini, L. Masi, G. Ferioli, A. Trenkwalder, S. Coop, M. Landini, L. Pezz` e, G. Mod- ugno, M. Inguscio, A. Smerzi, and M. Fattori, Crossing over from attractive to repulsive interactions in a tunnel- ing bosonic Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 230403 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Burchianti, F

    A. Burchianti, F. Scazza, A. Amico, G. Valtolina, J. A. Seman, C. Fort, M. Zaccanti, M. Inguscio, and G. Roati, Connecting dissipation and phase slips in a Josephson junction between fermionic superfluids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 025302 (2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    W. J. Kwon, G. Del Pace, R. Panza, M. Inguscio, W. Zw- erger, M. Zaccanti, F. Scazza, and G. Roati, Strongly correlated superfluid order parameters from dc Joseph- son supercurrents, Science369, 84 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Luick, L

    N. Luick, L. Sobirey, M. Bohlen, V. P. Singh, L. Mathey, T. Lompe, and H. Moritz, An ideal Josephson junction in an ultracold two-dimensional Fermi gas, Science369, 89 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    A. J. E. Kreil, H. Y. Musiienko-Shmarova, P. Frey, A. Pomyalov, V. S. L’vov, G. A. Melkov, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Experimental observation of Josephson oscillations in a room-temperature Bose-Einstein magnon condensate, Phys. Rev. B104, 144414 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Biagioni, N

    G. Biagioni, N. Antolini, B. Donelli, L. Pezz` e, A. Smerzi, M. Fattori, A. Fioretti, C. Gabbanini, M. Inguscio, L. Tanzi, and G. Modugno, Measurement of the super- fluid fraction of a supersolid by Josephson effect, Nature 629, 773 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Smerzi, S

    A. Smerzi, S. Fantoni, S. Giovanazzi, and S. R. Shenoy, Quantum coherent atomic tunneling between two trapped Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4950 (1997)

    work page 1997

  27. [27]

    Raghavan, A

    S. Raghavan, A. Smerzi, S. Fantoni, and S. R. Shenoy, Coherent oscillations between two weakly coupled Bose- Einstein condensates: Josephson effects,πoscillations, and macroscopic quantum self-trapping, Phys. Rev. A 59, 620 (1999)

    work page 1999

  28. [28]

    Z¨ ollner, H.-D

    S. Z¨ ollner, H.-D. Meyer, and P. Schmelcher, Few-boson dynamics in double wells: From single-atom to correlated pair tunneling, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 040401 (2008)

    work page 2008

  29. [29]

    Z¨ ollner, H.-D

    S. Z¨ ollner, H.-D. Meyer, and P. Schmelcher, Tunneling dynamics of a few bosons in a double well, Phys. Rev. A 78, 013621 (2008)

    work page 2008

  30. [30]

    F¨ olling, S

    S. F¨ olling, S. Trotzky, P. Cheinet, M. Feld, R. Saers, A. Widera, T. M¨ uller, and I. Bloch, Direct observation of second-order atom tunnelling, Nature448, 1029 (2007)

    work page 2007

  31. [31]

    Longhi, Optical realization of two-boson tunneling dy- namics, Phys

    S. Longhi, Optical realization of two-boson tunneling dy- namics, Phys. Rev. A83, 043835 (2011)

    work page 2011

  32. [32]

    Lewenstein, A

    M. Lewenstein, A. Sanpera, and V. Ahufinger,Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices: Simulating quantum many- body systems(Oxford University Press, 2012)

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    Mazzarella, S

    G. Mazzarella, S. M. Giampaolo, and F. Illuminati, Ex- tended Bose Hubbard model of interacting bosonic atoms in optical lattices: From superfluidity to density waves, Phys. Rev. A73, 013625 (2006)

    work page 2006

  34. [34]

    Liang, J.-L

    J.-Q. Liang, J.-L. Liu, W.-D. Li, and Z.-J. Li, Atom-pair tunneling and quantum phase transition in the strong- interaction regime, Phys. Rev. A79, 033617 (2009)

    work page 2009

  35. [35]

    Zhou, Y.-S

    X.-F. Zhou, Y.-S. Zhang, and G.-C. Guo, Pair tunneling of bosonic atoms in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A80, 013605 (2009)

    work page 2009

  36. [36]

    T. A. Zaleski and T. K. Kope´ c, Pair superfluidity in gen- eralized Bose-Hubbard models, Phys. Rev. B111, 134510 (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Sowi´ nski, O

    T. Sowi´ nski, O. Dutta, P. Hauke, L. Tagliacozzo, and M. Lewenstein, Dipolar molecules in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 115301 (2012)

    work page 2012

  38. [38]

    M. Maik, P. Hauke, O. Dutta, M. Lewenstein, and J. Za- krzewski, Density-dependent tunneling in the extended Bose-Hubbard model, New J. Phys.15, 113041 (2013)

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    J. I. Cirac, M. Lewenstein, K. Mølmer, and P. Zoller, Quantum superposition states of Bose-Einstein conden- sates, Phys. Rev. A57, 1208 (1998)

    work page 1998

  40. [40]

    Y. P. Huang and M. G. Moore, Creation, detection, and decoherence of macroscopic quantum superposition states in double-well Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A73, 023606 (2006)

    work page 2006

  41. [41]

    Mazzarella, L

    G. Mazzarella, L. Salasnich, A. Parola, and F. Toigo, Coherence and entanglement in the ground state of a bosonic Josephson junction: From macroscopic Schr¨ odinger cat states to separable Fock states, Phys. Rev. A83, 053607 (2011)

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    Trenkwalder, G

    A. Trenkwalder, G. Spagnolli, G. Semeghini, S. Coop, M. Landini, P. Castilho, L. Pezz` e, G. Modugno, M. In- guscio, A. Smerzi, and M. Fattori, Quantum phase transi- tions with parity-symmetry breaking and hysteresis, Na- ture Phys.12, 826 (2016)

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    Vianello, M

    C. Vianello, M. Ferraretto, and L. Salasnich, Finite- temperature entanglement and coherence in asymmetric bosonic Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. A111, 063310 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    Hereg= 4πℏ 2as/m, witha s thes-wave scattering length, andγ=µ 0µ2/4πfor magnetic dipoles (µ 0 is the vacuum permeability andµis the magnetic dipole mo- ment) orγ=d 2/4πε0 for electric dipoles (ε 0 is the vac- uum permittivity anddis the electric dipole moment)

    work page

  45. [45]

    Ananikian and T

    D. Ananikian and T. Bergeman, Gross-Pitaevskii equa- tion for Bose particles in a double-well potential: Two- mode models and beyond, Phys. Rev. A73, 013604 (2006)

    work page 2006

  46. [46]

    Pizzardo, G

    M. Pizzardo, G. Mazzarella, and L. Salasnich, Quantum correlations of few dipolar bosons in a double-well trap, J. Low Temp. Phys.185, 59 (2016)

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    Mazzarella and L

    G. Mazzarella and L. Dell’Anna, Two-mode dipolar bosonic junctions, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.217, 197 (2013). 14

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    Dutta, A

    S. Dutta, A. Barman, A. Siddharth, A. Khan, and S. Basu, Tunneling dynamics of correlated bosons in a double well potential, Eur. Phys. J. B88, 139 (2015)

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Amico and V

    L. Amico and V. Penna, Dynamical mean field theory of the Bose-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 2189 (1998)

    work page 1998

  50. [50]

    R. J. Glauber, Coherent and incoherent states of the ra- diation field, Phys. Rev.131, 2766 (1963)

    work page 1963

  51. [51]

    Zhang, D

    W.-M. Zhang, D. H. Feng, and R. Gilmore, Coherent states: Theory and some applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 867 (1990)

    work page 1990

  52. [52]

    Mazzarella, M

    G. Mazzarella, M. Moratti, L. Salasnich, M. Salerno, and F. Toigo, Atomic Josephson junction with two bosonic species, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.42, 125301 (2009)

    work page 2009

  53. [53]

    M. Abad, M. Guilleumas, R. Mayol, M. Pi, and D. M. Jezek, A dipolar self-induced bosonic Josephson junction, EPL94, 10004 (2011)

    work page 2011

  54. [54]

    J. R. Anglin, P. Drummond, and A. Smerzi, Exact quan- tum phase model for mesoscopic Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. A64, 063605 (2001)

    work page 2001

  55. [55]

    Mazzarella, M

    G. Mazzarella, M. Moratti, L. Salasnich, and F. Toigo, Nonlinear quantum model for atomic Josephson junc- tions with one and two bosonic species, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.43, 065303 (2010)

    work page 2010

  56. [56]

    Mel´ e-Messeguer, B

    M. Mel´ e-Messeguer, B. Juli´ a-D´ ıaz, M. Guilleumas, A. Polls, and A. Sanpera, Weakly linked binary mixtures ofF= 1 87Rb Bose-Einstein condensates, New J. Phys. 13, 033012 (2011)

    work page 2011

  57. [57]

    Rubeni, J

    D. Rubeni, J. Links, P. S. Isaac, and A. Foerster, Two-site Bose-Hubbard model with nonlinear tunneling: Classical and quantum analysis, Phys. Rev. A95, 043607 (2017)

    work page 2017

  58. [58]

    This is the von Neumann entropy of the reduced density matrix ˆρR = PN i=0 pi|i, N−i⟩⟨i, N−i|, obtained as the partial trace of ˆρ=|E 0⟩⟨E0|over either the left or the right well, and therefore is a measure of the bipartite entanglement between the two wells [35, 37]

    work page

  59. [59]

    Juli´ a-D´ ıaz, D

    B. Juli´ a-D´ ıaz, D. Dagnino, M. Lewenstein, J. Martorell, and A. Polls, Macroscopic self-trapping in Bose-Einstein condensates: Analysis of a dynamical quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. A81, 023615 (2010)

    work page 2010

  60. [60]

    Q. Zhu, Q. Zhang, and B. Wu, Extended two-site Bose- Hubbard model with pair tunneling: spontaneous sym- metry breaking, effective ground state and fragmenta- tion, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.48, 045301 (2015)

    work page 2015

  61. [61]

    Liu and J.-Q

    J.-L. Liu and J.-Q. Liang, Atom-pair tunnelling-induced quantum phase transition and scaling behaviour of fi- delity susceptibility in the extended boson Josephson- junction model, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.44, 025101 (2010)

    work page 2010

  62. [62]

    F. T. Arecchi, E. Courtens, R. Gilmore, and H. Thomas, Atomic coherent states in quantum optics, Phys. Rev. A 6, 2211 (1972)

    work page 1972

  63. [63]

    A. J. Leggett, Bose-Einstein condensation in the alkali gases: Some fundamental concepts, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 307 (2001)

    work page 2001

  64. [64]

    The values ofz 0 andϕ 0 can be measured in a time-of-flight expansion

    The atomic coherent state is represented by theN- body wavefunction Ψ({x i}) = QN i=1[ q 1+z0 2 ΦL(xi) +q 1−z0 2 eiϕ0ΦR(xi)]. The values ofz 0 andϕ 0 can be measured in a time-of-flight expansion. If att= 0 the trap is released, maintaining only the confinement in the transverse directions, the condensate wavefunc- tions evolve freely, and at timet >0 the...

    work page

  65. [65]

    Penrose and L

    O. Penrose and L. Onsager, Bose-Einstein condensation and liquid helium, Phys. Rev.104, 576 (1956)

    work page 1956

  66. [66]

    E. J. Mueller, T.-L. Ho, M. Ueda, and G. Baym, Frag- mentation of Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 74, 033612 (2006)

    work page 2006

  67. [67]

    Bader and U

    P. Bader and U. R. Fischer, Fragmented many-body ground states for scalar bosons in a single trap, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 060402 (2009)

    work page 2009

  68. [68]

    U. R. Fischer and B. Xiong, Robustness of fragmented condensate many-body states for continuous distribu- tion amplitudes in Fock space, Phys. Rev. A88, 053602 (2013)

    work page 2013

  69. [69]

    Gu, Fidelity approach to quantum phase transi- tions, Int

    S.-J. Gu, Fidelity approach to quantum phase transi- tions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B24, 4371 (2010)

    work page 2010

  70. [70]

    Zanardi and N

    P. Zanardi and N. Paunkovi´ c, Ground state overlap and quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. E74, 031123 (2006)

    work page 2006

  71. [71]

    You, Y.-W

    W.-L. You, Y.-W. Li, and S.-J. Gu, Fidelity, dynamic structure factor, and susceptibility in critical phenomena, Phys. Rev. E76, 022101 (2007)

    work page 2007

  72. [72]

    Zanardi, P

    P. Zanardi, P. Giorda, and M. Cozzini, Information- theoretic differential geometry of quantum phase tran- sitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 100603 (2007)

    work page 2007

  73. [73]

    Gu and H.-Q

    S.-J. Gu and H.-Q. Lin, Scaling dimension of fidelity sus- ceptibility in quantum phase transitions, EPL87, 10003 (2009)

    work page 2009

  74. [74]

    Carrasquilla, S

    J. Carrasquilla, S. R. Manmana, and M. Rigol, Scaling of the gap, fidelity susceptibility, and bloch oscillations across the superfluid-to-Mott-insulator transition in the one-dimensional Bose-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. A87, 043606 (2013)

    work page 2013

  75. [75]

    Campostrini, J

    M. Campostrini, J. Nespolo, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vi- cari, Finite-size scaling at first-order quantum transi- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 070402 (2014)

    work page 2014

  76. [76]

    J¨ a¨ askel¨ ainen and P

    M. J¨ a¨ askel¨ ainen and P. Meystre, Dynamics of Bose- Einstein condensates in double-well potentials, Phys. Rev. A71, 043603 (2005)

    work page 2005

  77. [77]

    Vianello, S

    C. Vianello, S. Salvatore, and L. Salasnich, Quantum ac- tion of the Josephson dynamics, Int. J. Theor. Phys.64, 315 (2025)

    work page 2025

  78. [78]

    Sakmann, A

    K. Sakmann, A. I. Streltsov, O. E. Alon, and L. S. Ceder- baum, Exact quantum dynamics of a bosonic Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 220601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  79. [79]

    M. Heyl, A. Polkovnikov, and S. Kehrein, Dynamical quantum phase transitions in the transverse-field Ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 135704 (2013)

    work page 2013

  80. [80]

    A. A. Zvyagin, Dynamical quantum phase transitions (Review Article), Low Temp. Phys.42, 971 (2016)

    work page 2016

Showing first 80 references.