Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Can Agents Distinguish Visually Hard-to-Separate Diseases in a Zero-Shot Setting? A Pilot Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2602.22959 v2 pith:XHUMT35W submitted 2026-02-26 cs.CV

Can Agents Distinguish Visually Hard-to-Separate Diseases in a Zero-Shot Setting? A Pilot Study

classification cs.CV
keywords clinicalsettingperformancevisuallyzero-shotagentsconfoundeddiagnostic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid progress of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) has led to increasing interest in agent-based systems. While most prior work in medical imaging concentrates on automating routine clinical workflows, we study an underexplored yet clinically significant setting: distinguishing visually hard-to-separate diseases in a zero-shot setting. We benchmark representative agents on two imaging-only proxy diagnostic tasks, (1) melanoma vs. atypical nevus and (2) pulmonary edema vs. pneumonia, where visual features are highly confounded despite substantial differences in clinical management. We introduce a multi-agent framework based on contrastive adjudication. Experimental results show improved diagnostic performance (an 11-percentage-point gain in accuracy on dermoscopy data) and reduced unsupported claims on qualitative samples, although overall performance remains insufficient for clinical deployment. We acknowledge the inherent uncertainty in human annotations and the absence of clinical context, which further limit the translation to real-world settings. Within this controlled setting, this pilot study provides preliminary insights into zero-shot agent performance in visually confounded scenarios.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. From Clinical Intent to Clinical Model: Autonomous Coding-Agents for Clinician-driven AI Development

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    An autonomous coding-agent framework allows clinicians to independently develop clinical AI models via natural language, achieving promising results on lesion classification, fracture detection, and debiased pneumotho...

  2. From Clinical Intent to Clinical Model: Autonomous Coding-Agents for Clinician-driven AI Development

    cs.CV 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    Autonomous coding agents translate plain-language clinical descriptions into working AI pipelines, producing competitive models across five tasks and reducing pneumothorax shortcut reliance on chest drains from 60% to...