arxiv: 2602.22999 · v1 · submitted 2026-02-26 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: no theorem link

Pressure-induced reentrant superconductivity in a misfit layered compound mathrm{(SnS)_{1.15}(TaS₂)}

Chutong Zhang , Jiajia Feng , Xiao Tang , Xiangzhuo Xing , Na Zuo , Xiaolei Yi , Yan Meng , Xiaoran Zhang

show 5 more authors

Rajesh Kumar Ulaganathan Raman Sankar Xiaofeng Xu Xin Chen Xiaobing Liu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 19:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords reentrant superconductivitymisfit layered compoundhigh pressureelectronic reconstructionHall coefficientvan der Waals heterostructureTaS2SnS

0 comments

The pith

A new superconducting phase reemerges above 80 GPa in the misfit compound (SnS)1.15(TaS2) after the low-pressure phase is suppressed.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the effects of extreme pressure on the superconducting and transport properties of the misfit layered compound (SnS)1.15(TaS2). The original superconducting state is gradually suppressed with increasing pressure and vanishes near 14.7 GPa, accompanied by rising residual resistance. A distinct superconducting phase then reappears above 80 GPa and remains stable up to the highest pressures reached at 150 GPa. This reentrant behavior occurs after a sign reversal in the Hall coefficient near 60 GPa and a nonmonotonic change in normal-state resistance, all without any detected structural phase transition. The findings indicate that pressure can drive an electronic reconstruction in these natural van der Waals heterostructures to restore superconductivity.

Core claim

In (SnS)1.15(TaS2), the low-pressure superconducting phase disappears near 14.7 GPa while residual resistance increases; above 80 GPa a separate superconducting phase reemerges and persists to 150 GPa. This reentrance follows a pressure-induced reversal of the Hall coefficient sign near 60 GPa together with nonmonotonic evolution of the normal-state resistance, with no structural phase transition observed across the full pressure range. The results point to a pressure-driven electronic reconstruction that restores superconductivity in the misfit layered structure.

What carries the argument

Pressure-induced electronic reconstruction, signaled by Hall coefficient sign reversal near 60 GPa and nonmonotonic normal-state resistance, that restores superconductivity without structural change.

If this is right

Superconductivity in misfit compounds can be suppressed then restored purely by pressure tuning of the electronic state.
Electronic reconstructions can produce multiple distinct superconducting regimes in the same material without lattice changes.
Transport signatures such as Hall reversal and resistance nonmonotonicity can precede reentrant superconductivity.
Pressure serves as a clean control parameter for engineering quantum states in natural van der Waals heterostructures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar pressure-driven reentrant superconductivity may appear in other misfit compounds with comparable layer decoupling.
Band-structure calculations under pressure could identify which Fermi-surface pockets or bands are reconstructed at the Hall reversal.
The high-pressure superconducting phase may have a different pairing symmetry or gap structure from the low-pressure phase.

Load-bearing premise

The drop in resistance above 80 GPa represents bulk superconductivity rather than filamentary or surface superconductivity, and the Hall sign reversal directly indicates an electronic reconstruction.

What would settle it

A clear Meissner effect or a sharp specific-heat anomaly coinciding with the resistance drop above 80 GPa would confirm that the high-pressure phase is bulk superconductivity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.22999 by Chutong Zhang, Jiajia Feng, Na Zuo, Rajesh Kumar Ulaganathan, Raman Sankar, Xiangzhuo Xing, Xiaobing Liu, Xiaofeng Xu, Xiaolei Yi, Xiaoran Zhang, Xiao Tang, Xin Chen, Yan Meng.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Electrical transport properties of (SnS) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. High-pressure phase diagram of (SnS) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Misfit layered compounds are natural van der Waals heterostructures in which electronically active transition-metal dichalcogenide layers are decoupled by incommensurate blocking layers, enabling bulk realization of quasi-two-dimensional quantum states. Here we investigate the superconducting, transport,and structural properties of the misfit compound $\mathrm{(SnS)_{1.15}(TaS_2)}$ under pressures up to 150 GPa. The low-pressure superconducting phase is gradually suppressed and disappears near 14.7 GPa,accompanied by increasing residual resistance. Remarkably, a distinct superconducting phase reemerges above 80 GPa and persists to the highest pressures achieved. This reentrant superconductivity follows a pressure-induced sign reversal of the Hall coefficient near 60 GPa and a nonmonotonic evolution of the normal-state resistance, indicating an electronic reconstruction. No structural phase transition is detected over the entire pressure range. Our results demonstrate a pressure-driven electronic reconstruction leading to reentrant superconductivity in a misfit layered compound, establishing pressure as an effective route to engineer superconductivity and electronic states in natural van der Waals heterostructures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Reentrant SC above 80 GPa after suppression at 15 GPa is the new experimental fact here, but the bulk nature rests on resistance drops alone.

read the letter

The paper shows superconductivity in (SnS)1.15(TaS2) disappearing near 14.7 GPa and then reappearing above 80 GPa, accompanied by a Hall coefficient sign change around 60 GPa and no structural transition up to 150 GPa. That combination in this specific misfit compound is new and worth noting for people working on pressure-tuned layered materials. They collected resistivity, Hall, and XRD data across the full pressure range, which gives a consistent picture of nonmonotonic normal-state behavior tied to the reentrance. The absence of a structural change is a clear experimental point that rules out one common explanation for such effects. The data quality on the transport side looks reasonable from what is described, and the pressure values are specific enough to be useful for follow-up work. The main limitation is that the superconducting transitions are identified from resistance drops without accompanying bulk probes such as AC susceptibility or specific heat. In diamond anvil cell experiments, resistance can pick up filamentary paths or surface contributions, particularly when residual resistance stays elevated at intermediate pressures. The electronic reconstruction interpretation follows from the Hall reversal, but it stays qualitative without band calculations or higher-resolution local probes. This is a solid experimental report for the high-pressure superconductivity community. Readers who care about van der Waals heterostructures and pressure as a tuning knob will find the numbers and the reentrance useful even if they want more confirmation on the bulk character. It deserves peer review because the central observation is new and the measurements are straightforward to check.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports high-pressure transport and structural measurements on the misfit layered compound (SnS)1.15(TaS2) up to 150 GPa. It shows that the ambient-pressure superconducting phase is suppressed and vanishes near 14.7 GPa, accompanied by rising residual resistance. A distinct superconducting phase then reappears above 80 GPa and persists to the highest pressures studied. This reentrant superconductivity is preceded by a sign reversal of the Hall coefficient near 60 GPa and nonmonotonic changes in normal-state resistance, which the authors interpret as signatures of an electronic reconstruction. No structural phase transition is detected by XRD over the full pressure range.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the result would establish pressure-driven electronic reconstruction as a route to reentrant superconductivity in natural van der Waals heterostructures, extending the known phenomenology of misfit compounds and providing a concrete experimental example of pressure-tuned Fermi-surface changes that restore superconductivity after its initial suppression.

major comments (2)

[Results (high-pressure regime)] High-pressure transport results: The reentrant superconducting phase above 80 GPa is identified exclusively from a drop in four-probe resistance. In diamond-anvil-cell experiments, resistance alone is susceptible to filamentary paths, pressure gradients, or surface effects, particularly when residual resistance remains elevated between 15 and 80 GPa. Without AC susceptibility, magnetization, or specific-heat data showing a diamagnetic response or thermodynamic anomaly at the same Tc, the bulk character of the high-pressure phase remains under-constrained.
[Transport measurements] Hall-effect and normal-state transport: The sign reversal of the Hall coefficient near 60 GPa is presented as direct evidence for an electronic reconstruction that enables the reentrant superconductivity. However, the manuscript provides no supporting band-structure calculations or Fermi-surface modeling to identify which bands cross the Fermi level or how the carrier type changes, leaving the microscopic mechanism interpretive rather than demonstrated.

minor comments (2)

[Methods and figure captions] The criteria used to define Tc (e.g., onset, 50 % resistance drop, or zero-resistance point) and any error bars on the reported transition temperatures and Hall coefficients are not stated, complicating quantitative comparison with other pressure studies.
[Experimental details] Sample characterization metrics (residual resistivity ratio, rocking-curve widths, or stoichiometry confirmation) are mentioned only briefly; explicit values would strengthen claims about sample quality and reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, providing the strongest honest defense of our experimental claims while acknowledging limitations inherent to high-pressure diamond-anvil-cell measurements.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Results (high-pressure regime)] High-pressure transport results: The reentrant superconducting phase above 80 GPa is identified exclusively from a drop in four-probe resistance. In diamond-anvil-cell experiments, resistance alone is susceptible to filamentary paths, pressure gradients, or surface effects, particularly when residual resistance remains elevated between 15 and 80 GPa. Without AC susceptibility, magnetization, or specific-heat data showing a diamagnetic response or thermodynamic anomaly at the same Tc, the bulk character of the high-pressure phase remains under-constrained.

Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting the challenges of confirming bulk superconductivity from resistance alone in DAC experiments. Our data show a sharp, reproducible drop to zero resistance above 80 GPa that increases in temperature with further compression, occurring after the Hall sign reversal and without any detected structural change by XRD. These features are inconsistent with simple filamentary or surface artifacts, which typically do not produce such systematic pressure evolution or correlation with normal-state transport changes. We have added a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript discussing possible non-bulk contributions and the supporting circumstantial evidence from the full dataset. However, we acknowledge that AC susceptibility or specific-heat measurements would provide stronger thermodynamic confirmation; such experiments are technically prohibitive at >80 GPa with our current sample geometry and pressure range. revision: partial
Referee: [Transport measurements] Hall-effect and normal-state transport: The sign reversal of the Hall coefficient near 60 GPa is presented as direct evidence for an electronic reconstruction that enables the reentrant superconductivity. However, the manuscript provides no supporting band-structure calculations or Fermi-surface modeling to identify which bands cross the Fermi level or how the carrier type changes, leaving the microscopic mechanism interpretive rather than demonstrated.

Authors: The sign reversal of the Hall coefficient constitutes direct experimental evidence of a change in the dominant carrier type, which necessarily signals a Fermi-surface reconstruction. This is reinforced by the simultaneous nonmonotonic evolution of the normal-state resistance, forming a coherent experimental picture of an electronic transition that precedes and enables the reentrant superconductivity. While density-functional calculations could in principle identify the specific bands, the incommensurate misfit structure of (SnS)1.15(TaS2) renders reliable high-pressure band-structure modeling computationally intensive and outside the scope of this primarily experimental work. We have clarified the language in the revised manuscript to emphasize that our interpretation rests on the transport observables rather than a detailed microscopic model, and we maintain that the Hall data alone provides substantive evidence for the claimed electronic reconstruction. revision: no

standing simulated objections not resolved

Direct confirmation of bulk superconductivity in the reentrant phase via AC susceptibility, magnetization, or specific-heat measurements above 80 GPa, which remain experimentally inaccessible with current diamond-anvil-cell techniques for this sample size and pressure range.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental observations with no derivation chain

full rationale

This is an experimental paper reporting high-pressure measurements of resistance, Hall coefficient, and XRD on (SnS)1.15(TaS2). The central claims rest on direct observations: suppression of low-pressure SC near 14.7 GPa, reemergence of resistance drop above 80 GPa, Hall sign reversal near 60 GPa, nonmonotonic normal-state resistance, and absence of structural transitions up to 150 GPa. No equations, fitted parameters, theoretical predictions, or ansatzes are present. No load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems are invoked to derive results. The findings are independent experimental data that do not reduce to prior inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on experimental transport measurements under pressure; no free parameters, mathematical derivations, or newly postulated entities are introduced. The interpretation of Hall sign reversal as electronic reconstruction is a standard domain assumption in condensed-matter physics.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Sign reversal of the Hall coefficient indicates a change in dominant charge carrier type or electronic band structure
Invoked in the abstract to link the Hall data to electronic reconstruction without additional justification or calculation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5553 in / 1458 out tokens · 45790 ms · 2026-05-15T19:12:03.348993+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

[1]

Geim, and I.V

A.K. Geim, and I.V. Grigorieva, Van der Waals heterostructures, Nature 499, 419-425 (2013)

work page 2013
[2]

Liu, N.O

Y. Liu, N.O. Weiss, X. Duan, H.-C. Cheng, Y. Huang, and X. Duan, Van der Waals heterostructures and devices, Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, (2016)

work page 2016
[3]

Novoselov, A

K.S. Novoselov, A. Mishchenko, A. Carvalho, and A.H. Castro Neto, 2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures, Science 353, (2016)

work page 2016
[4]

Chhowalla, H.S

M. Chhowalla, H.S. Shin, G. Eda, L.-J. Li, K.P. Loh, and H. Zhang, The chemistry of two- dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets, Nat. Chem. 5, 263-275 (2013)

work page 2013
[5]

Fiori, F

G. Fiori, F. Bonaccorso, G. Iannaccone, T. Palacios, D. Neumaier, A. Seabaugh, S.K. Banerjee, and L. Colombo, Electronics based on two-dimensional materials, Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 768-779 (2014)

work page 2014
[6]

Novoselov, V.I

K.S. Novoselov, V.I. Fal′ko, L. Colombo, P.R. Gellert, M.G. Schwab, and K. Kim, A roadmap for graphene, Nature 490, 192-200 (2012)

work page 2012
[7]

Q.H. Wang, K. Kalantar-Zadeh, A. Kis, J.N. Coleman, and M.S. Strano, Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 699-712 (2012)

work page 2012
[8]

G. Chen, L. Jiang, S. Wu, B. Lyu, H. Li, B.L. Chittari, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Shi, J. Jung, et al., Evidence of a gate-tunable Mott insulator in a trilayer graphene moiré superlattice, Nat. Phys. 15, 237-241 (2019)

work page 2019
[9]

Devarakonda, H

A. Devarakonda, H. Inoue, S. Fang, C. Ozsoy-Keskinbora, T. Suzuki, M. Kriener, L. Fu, E. Kaxiras, D.C. Bell, and J.G. Checkelsky, Clean 2D superconductivity in a bulk van der Waals superlattice, Science 370, 231–236 (2020)

work page 2020
[10]

Kezilebieke, M.N

S. Kezilebieke, M.N. Huda, V. Vaňo, M. Aapro, S.C. Ganguli, O.J. Silveira, S. Głodzik, A.S. Foster, T. Ojanen, and P. Liljeroth, Topological superconductivity in a van der Waals heterostructure, Nature 588, 424-428 (2020)

work page 2020
[11]

W.-M. Zhao, L. Zhu, Z. Nie, Q.-Y. Li, Q.-W. Wang, L.-G. Dou, J.-G. Hu, L. Xian, S. Meng, and S.-C. Li, Moiré enhanced charge density wave state in twisted 1T-TiTe2/1T-TiSe2 heterostructures, Nat. Mater. 21, 284-289 (2021)

work page 2021
[12]

Ng, and T.M

N. Ng, and T.M. McQueen, Misfit layered compounds: Unique, tunable heterostructured materials with untapped properties, APL Mater. 10, 100901 (2022)

work page 2022
[13]

Takahashi, T

T. Takahashi, T. Oka, O. Yamada, and K. Ametani, Synthesis and crystallographic properties of lanthanum transition metal sulfides LaMS3; M= Cr, Mn, Fe, and Co, Mater. Res. Bull. 6, 173 (1971)

work page 1971
[14]

Wiegers, A

G. Wiegers, A. Meetsma, R. Haange, and J.d. Boer, Structure and physical properties of (SnS)1.18NbS2,“SnNbS3”, a compound with misfit layer structure, Mater. Res. Bull. 23, 1551 (1988)

work page 1988
[15]

Agarwal, C

T. Agarwal, C. Patra, P. Manna, S. Srivastava, P. Mishra, S. Sharma, and R.P. Singh, Anomalous magnetotransport in the superconducting architecturally misfit layered system (PbS)1.13TaS2, Phys. Rev. B 112, 014501 (2025). 10

work page 2025
[16]

C. Jia, W. Huang, H. Yang, C. Luo, L. Jiang, S. Wu, M. Li, M. Fan, Y. Yang, and H. Zhang, Coexistence of Ferroelectricity and Metallicity in Weakly Coupled (SnSe)1.16(NbSe2) Crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 236802 (2025)

work page 2025
[17]

S. K. P, R.A. Gofman, Y. Nitzav, A. Almoalem, I. Mangel, T. Shiroka, N.C. Plumb, C. Bigi, F. Bertran, J. Sánchez-Barriga, et al., Ising superconductivity in the bulk incommensurate layered material (PbS)1.13(TaS2), Phys. Rev. B 111, 054509 (2025)

work page 2025
[18]

Z. Li, P. Lyu, Z. Chen, D. Guan, S. Yu, J. Zhao, P. Huang, X. Zhou, Z. Qiu, H. Fang, et al., Beyond Conventional Charge Density Wave for Strongly Enhanced 2D Superconductivity in 1H‐TaS2 Superlattices, Adv. Mater. 2312341 (2024)

work page 2024
[19]

M. Maki, A. Koga, and T. Nishizaki, Anisotropic superconducting properties of the misfit layer compound (SnS)1.15(TaS2), Phys. Rev. B 112, 184516 (2025)

work page 2025
[20]

Zhong, H

H. Zhong, H. Zhang, H. Zhang, T. Bao, K. Zhang, S. Xu, L. Luo, A. Rousuli, W. Yao, J.D. Denlinger, et al., Revealing the two-dimensional electronic structure and anisotropic superconductivity in a natural van der Waals superlattice (PbSe)1.14NbSe2, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, L041801 (2023)

work page 2023
[21]

Itahashi, Y

Y.M. Itahashi, Y. Nohara, M. Chazono, H. Matsuoka, K. Arioka, T. Nomoto, Y. Kohama, Y. Yanase, Y. Iwasa, and K. Kobayashi, Misfit layered superconductor (PbSe)1.14(NbSe2)3 with possible layer-selective FFLO state, Nat. Commun. 16, 7022 (2025)

work page 2025
[22]

X. Sun, Z. Deng, Y. Yang, S. Yu, Y. Huang, Y. Lu, Q. Tao, D.W. Shen, W.Y. He, C. Xi, et al., Tunable Mirror‐Symmetric Type‐III Ising Superconductivity in Atomically‐Thin Natural Van der Waals Heterostructures, Adv. Mater. 37, 2411655 (2024)

work page 2024
[23]

Samuely, D

T. Samuely, D. Wickramaratne, M. Gmitra, T. Jaouen, O. Šofranko, D. Volavka, M. Kuzmiak, J. Haniš, P. Szabó, C. Monney, et al., Protection of Ising spin-orbit coupling in bulk misfit superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 108, L220501 (2023)

work page 2023
[24]

Niedzielski, B.D

D. Niedzielski, B.D. Faeth, B.H. Goodge, M. Sinha, T.M. McQueen, L.F. Kourkoutis, and T.A. Arias, Unmasking Charge Transfer in the Misfits: ARPES and Ab Initio Prediction of Electronic Structure in Layered Incommensurate Systems without Artificial Strain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 206202 (2025)

work page 2025
[25]

S. Li, X. Wang, Z. Yang, L. Zhang, S.L. Teo, M. Lin, R. He, N. Wang, P. Song, W. Tian, et al., Giant Third-Order Nonlinear Hall Effect in Misfit Layer Compound (SnS)1.17(NbS2)3, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16, 11043-11049 (2024)

work page 2024
[26]

M. Shan, S. Li, Y. Yang, D. Zhao, J. Li, L. Nie, Z. Wu, Y. Zhou, L. Zheng, B. Kang, et al., Anisotropic Spin Fluctuations Induced by Spin‐Orbit Coupling in a Misfit Layer Compound (LaSe)1.14(NbSe2), Adv. Sci. 11, 2403824 (2024)

work page 2024
[27]

Almoalem, S

A. Almoalem, S. Kunhiparambath, R.A. Gofman, Y. Nitzav, I. Mangel, N. Ragoler, J. Fujii, I. Vobornik, F. Bertran, A. Kanigel, et al., Mixed Triplet-Singlet Order Parameter in Decoupled Superconducting 1H Monolayers of Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides, arXiv:2509.13303. 11

work page arXiv
[28]

Wiegers, Charge transfer between layers in misfit layer compounds, J

G.A. Wiegers, Charge transfer between layers in misfit layer compounds, J. Alloys Compd. 219, 152-156 (1995)

work page 1995
[29]

S. Wang, Y. Han, S. Sun, S. Wang, C. An, C. Chen, L. Zhang, Y. Zhou, J. Zhou, and Z. Yang, Pressure Induced Nonmonotonic Evolution of Superconductivity in 6R−TaS2 with a Natural Bulk Van der Waals Heterostructure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 056001 (2024)

work page 2024
[30]

L. Yan, C. Ding, M. Li, R. Tang, W. Chen, B. Liu, K. Bu, T. Huang, D. Dai, X. Jin, et al., Modulating Charge-Density Wave Order and Superconductivity from Two Alternative Stacked Monolayers in a Bulk 4Hb-TaSe2 Heterostructure via Pressure, Nano Lett. 23, 2121-2128 (2023)

work page 2023
[31]

C. Pei, P. Zhu, B. Li, Y. Zhao, L. Gao, C. Li, S. Zhu, Q. Zhang, T. Ying, L. Gu, et al., Pressure- induced superconductivity in topological heterostructure (PbSe)5(Bi2Se3)6, Sci. China Mater. 66, 2822- 2828 (2023)

work page 2023
[32]

X.-M. Zhao, K. Zhang, Z.-Y. Cao, Z.-W. Zhao, V.V. Struzhkin, A.F. Goncharov, H.-K. Wang, A.G. Gavriliuk, H.-K. Mao, and X.-J. Chen, Pressure tuning of the charge density wave and superconductivity in 2H−TaS2, Phys. Rev. B 101, 134506 (2020)

work page 2020
[33]

Q. Dong, J. Pan, S. Li, Y. Fang, T. Lin, S. Liu, B. Liu, Q. Li, F. Huang, and B. Liu, Record-High Superconductivity in Transition Metal Dichalcogenides Emerged in Compressed 2H-TaS2, Adv. Mater. 2103168 (2022)

work page 2022
[34]

Q. Dong, J. Pan, S. Li, C. Li, T. Lin, B. Liu, R. Liu, Q. Li, F. Huang, and B. Liu, Abnormal Metal– Semiconductor-Like Transition and Exceptional Enhanced Superconducting State in Pressurized Restacked TaS2, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 14581 (2023)

work page 2023
[35]

Sipos, A.F

B. Sipos, A.F. Kusmartseva, A. Akrap, H. Berger, L. Forró, and E. Tutiš, From Mott state to superconductivity in 1T-TaS2, Nat. Mater. 7, 960-965 (2008)

work page 2008
[36]

Pandey, A.P

T. Pandey, A.P. Nayak, J. Liu, S.T. Moran, J.S. Kim, L.J. Li, J.F. Lin, D. Akinwande, and A.K. Singh, Pressure‐Induced Charge Transfer Doping of Monolayer Graphene/MoS2 Heterostructure, Small 12, 4063-4069 (2016)

work page 2016
[37]

J. Xia, J. Yan, Z. Wang, Y. He, Y. Gong, W. Chen, T.C. Sum, Z. Liu, P.M. Ajayan, and Z. Shen, Strong coupling and pressure engineering in WSe2–MoSe2 heterobilayers, Nat. Phys. 17, 92-98 (2020)

work page 2020
[38]

B. Wang, Y. Liu, X. Luo, K. Ishigaki, K. Matsubayashi, W. Lu, Y. Sun, J. Cheng, and Y. Uwatoko, Universal phase diagram of superconductivity and charge density wave versus high hydrostatic pressure in pure and Se-doped 1T−TaS2, Phys. Rev. B 97, 220504(R) (2018)

work page 2018
[39]

J. Feng, C. Li, W. Deng, B. Lin, W. Liu, R.A. Susilo, H. Dong, Z. Chen, N. Zhou, X. Yi, et al., Superconductivity Induced by Lifshitz Transition in Pristine SnS2 under High Pressure, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 9404-9410 (2022)

work page 2022
[40]

See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/xxxxxx for more information on the experiment methods and the additional data

work page
[41]

Sankar, G

R. Sankar, G. Peramaiyan, I. Panneer Muthuselvam, C.-Y. Wen, X. Xu, and F.C. Chou, Superconductivity in a Misfit Layered (SnS)1.15(TaS2) Compound, Chem. Mater. 30, 1373-1378 (2018). 12

work page 2018
[42]

H.K. Mao, J. Xu, and P.M. Bell, Calibration of the ruby pressure gauge to 800 kbar under quasi- hydrostatic conditions, J. Geophys. Res. 91, 4673 (1986)

work page 1986
[43]

Nagata, T

S. Nagata, T. Aochi, T. Abe, S. Ebisu, T. Hagino, Y. Seki, and K. Tsutsumi, Superconductivity in the layered compound 2H-TaS2, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 53, 1259 (1992)

work page 1992
[44]

Y. Yang, S. Fang, V. Fatemi, J. Ruhman, E. Navarro-Moratalla, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Enhanced superconductivity upon weakening of charge density wave transport in 2H-TaS2 in the two-dimensional limit, Phys. Rev. B 98, 035203 (2018)

work page 2018
[45]

de la Barrera, M.R

S.C. de la Barrera, M.R. Sinko, D.P. Gopalan, N. Sivadas, K.L. Seyler, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A.W. Tsen, X. Xu, D. Xiao, et al., Tuning Ising superconductivity with layer and spin–orbit coupling in two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Commun. 9, 1427 (2018)

work page 2018
[46]

Gotoh, M

Y. Gotoh, M. Onoda, J. Akimoto, M. Goto, and Y. Oosawa, The Layered Composite Crystal Structure of the Ternary Sulfide, (SnS)1.15TaS2 “SnTaS3”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 760 (1993)

work page 1993
[47]

Anderson, Theory of dirty superconductors, J

P. Anderson, Theory of dirty superconductors, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 11, 26 (1959)

work page 1959
[48]

Gutowska, K

S. Gutowska, K. Górnicka, P. Wójcik, T. Klimczuk, and B. Wiendlocha, Anisotropic, multiband, and strong-coupling superconductivity of the Pb0.64Bi0.36 alloy, Phys. Rev. B 110, 214510 (2024)

work page 2024
[49]

universal

P.W. Anderson, K.A. Muttalib, and T.V. Ramakrishnan, Theory of the "universal" degradation of Tc in high-temperature superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 28, 117-120 (1983)

work page 1983
[50]

Fukuyama, H

H. Fukuyama, H. Ebisawa, and S. Maekawa, Bulk superconductivity in weakly localized regime, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 53, 3560 (1984)

work page 1984