Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Multi-field inflation can stay stable even when the isocurvature mode has negative mass squared, if the turn rate decays fast enough.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 19:08 UTC pith:2FDIFR7V

load-bearing objection A genuinely new stability criterion for multi-field inflation with negative isocurvature masses, but the proof relies on adiabatic coefficients and the modular-inflation example violates the headline condition. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2603.03204 v2 pith:2FDIFR7V submitted 2026-03-03 hep-th astro-ph.CO

Ultra slow-turn inflation

Ana Ach\'ucarro , Perseas Christodoulidis , Jinn-Ouk Gong , Oksana Iarygina This is my paper
classification hep-th astro-ph.CO
keywords multi-field inflationultra slow-turntotal entropy perturbationisocurvature perturbationstachyonic effective massturn ratestability conditionsSL(2,Z) attractors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper claims that the standard stability condition for multi-field inflation—requiring the effective isocurvature mass squared μ²_eff to be positive—is too restrictive. In a class of models the authors call 'ultra slow-turn', the trajectory's turning rate Ω decays exponentially in e-folds, and this decay alone damps the total entropy perturbation even when μ²_eff is negative. The paper derives stability conditions in terms of the total entropy perturbation, M_s² > 0 and 3−ε+η−2η_Ω > 0, and shows that several recent string- and supergravity-inspired models satisfy them. If correct, the result expands the set of viable inflationary models: a tachyonic direction is not automatically fatal, as long as the turn rate falls away quickly enough.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the right diagnostic for slow-roll multi-field stability is the total entropy perturbation s (the curvature-sourcing combination of the isocurvature mode and the turning rate), not the bare isocurvature perturbation Q_n. On super-Hubble scales s obeys a damped oscillator equation with friction 3−ε+η−2η_Ω and effective mass M_s², which is equal to μ²_eff only when the turn rate is nearly constant. When Ω decays exponentially, η_Ω = (log Ω)' is −O(1), so M_s² can remain positive even while μ²_eff is negative; the two conditions (2.27), M_s² > 0 and 3−ε+η−2η_Ω > 0, guarantee that s decays and the curvature perturbation is not sourced on large scales. The paper

What carries the argument

The central object is the total entropy perturbation s = Ω/√(2ε) Q_n (on super-Hubble scales), whose equation of motion replaces the single isocurvature equation. The decisive identity is (1.9): M_s²/H² = μ²_eff/H² − η_Ω(3−ε−η_Ω) − η′_Ω + O(η, η′, η′_Ω). Because η_Ω = (log Ω)' is −O(1) when the turn rate decays exponentially (Ω ~ e^{−3N}), the negative contributions from μ²_eff are compensated, while the friction term 3−ε+η−2η_Ω stays positive; the solution then decays as s(N) ~ c₁ e^{2η_Ω N} + c₂ e^{−(3−ε)N}. This is the mechanism that shuts off the potential instability.

Load-bearing premise

The stability verdict rests on treating the expansion, slow-roll, and turn-rate parameters as nearly constant when diagonalising the perturbation equations; if the turn rate changes on the e-fold timescale of the modes, the eigenvalue conditions can misdiagnose stability.

What would settle it

Numerically integrate the full linear system (2.23)–(2.25) with time-dependent coefficients for a representative ultra slow-turn model (e.g., the SL(2,Z) example of Sec. 2.3) and check over 60 e-folds whether the total entropy perturbation follows the decay law (2.21) and R stays unsourced; if s grows or R is sourced even though (2.27) holds, the adiabatic-eigenvalue reasoning fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Models that fail the old μ²_eff > 0 test can still be stable if they meet (2.27); the criteria are coordinate independent and cover slow-turn, rapid-turn, and ultra slow-turn cases.
  • In ultra slow-turn models, the total entropy perturbation decays on super-Hubble scales, so the curvature perturbation is conserved and the CMB predictions match single-field inflation.
  • The conjecture accounts for the stability of several string/supergravity constructions, including SL(2,Z) attractors, fibre inflation, and modular inflation, where the isocurvature mass is negative.
  • If M_s² < 0 but the turn rate is tiny, the instability timescale (2.28) can be longer than the remaining inflation, so the model remains observationally viable, as in the modular-inflation example.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct extension of the paper's logic: the same η_Ω term that damps s on large scales amplifies the three-point interaction of one entropy and two adiabatic perturbations, likely producing a flattened bispectrum; computing it in the SL(2,Z) model is a concrete next step.
  • The criterion suggests a model-building tool: instead of adding stabilizing masses, one can design a decaying turn rate (e.g., through a growing field-space metric) to suppress isocurvature modes.
  • The distinction between Q_n and s may matter beyond inflation—during (p)reheating or with multiple spectator fields—where a rapidly changing metric function could similarly disguise an apparent tachyonic instability.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper revisits the stability of two-field inflationary backgrounds with negative effective isocurvature mass. It proposes the total entropy perturbation s = Ω Q_n / √(2ε) as the correct diagnostic, derives its effective mass M_s^2 in Eq. (1.9), and shows that a turn rate decaying as e^{−O(1)N} (η_Ω ≈ −O(1)) can keep M_s^2 positive even when μ_eff^2/H^2 < 0. The resulting stability conditions are (2.27): M_s^2 > 0 and 3 − ε + η − 2η_Ω > 0. The authors apply this to the SL(2,Z) model, where both conditions hold despite negative μ_eff^2, and to a modular-inflation toy model, which violates (2.27) but is argued to be long-lived. The derivation uses a frozen-coefficient eigenvalue analysis of the linear system (2.23)–(2.25).

Significance. If correct, the paper gives a simple, coordinate-invariant explanation of why some string/supergravity models can be stable with μ_eff^2 < 0, and it would change the standard stability test for multi-field inflation. The algebraic identity (1.9), the exact shift-symmetry derivation of μ_eff^2 in (2.10), and the agreement between analytic η_Ω and numerics (Fig. 1) are genuine strengths. The criterion (2.27) is falsifiable and can be checked model by model. However, the advertised scope is broader than what the adiabatic eigenvalue derivation proves, and the modular-inflation example illustrates this gap. With a direct time-dependent verification, the paper would be a useful contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.2, Eqs. (2.23)–(2.27)] The stability conditions (2.27) are obtained by freezing the coefficients of the linear system and neglecting terms of order η′ − 2η′_Ω. This is an adiabatic-eigenvalue statement. Positivity of A = 3 − ε + η − 2η_Ω and B = M_s^2/H^2 at each N does not by itself prove boundedness of s(N) and R(N) over 60 e-folds for a genuinely time-dependent system. This concern is acute in the ultra slow-turn regime, where η_Ω ≈ −O(1) and Ω decays exponentially, so the coefficients are not slowly varying in the usual small-parameter sense. The paper acknowledges after (2.26) that a more precise computation requires WKB, but no such computation or direct numerical integration of the perturbation system is provided. Since (2.27) is the central claim of the paper, please add either a direct numerical integration of s(N) and R(N) for the SL(2,Z) and modular examples, or a rigorous time-dependent estimate th
  2. [§2.3.1, Fig. 4 and Eq. (2.28)] The modular-inflation toy model violates the paper's own stability criterion (2.27): for χ′_0 = 0, Fig. 4 shows M_s^2/H^2 < 0 throughout inflation. The paper nonetheless regards it as viable, using the heuristic timescale estimate (2.28). That estimate is not derived from the linear system and depends on the initial turn rate Ω_0. As written, the example shows that a violation of (2.27) can be harmless, but the paper does not provide a quantitative criterion (e.g., ΔN_inst > 60) for when this is the case. This weakens the advertised claim that stability can be 'correctly inferred' from the total entropy perturbation: for this representative model the criterion overpredicts instability. Please make precise the conditions under which a negative M_s^2 is acceptable.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (2.21)] The solution s(N) = c_1 e^{2η_Ω N} + c_2 e^{−(3−ε)N} treats η_Ω as constant. In the actual models η_Ω varies with N. Please state this assumption explicitly, or replace the exponent by 2∫η_Ω dN and indicate the validity of the approximation.
  2. [Eq. (2.28)] Please define λ as the positive growth rate in the unstable channel and explain how the estimate ΔN_inst ∼ −λ^{−1} log Ω_0 is obtained. Currently it is presented as a rough estimate without a derivation.
  3. [Fig. 4 caption] For the χ′_0 = 0 case, M_s^2/H^2 < 0 throughout the evolution, not only near the end. The caption 'Both conditions fail at the end of inflation' is misleading and should be reworded to state when each condition is violated.
  4. [Footnote 3] Footnote 3 appears to contain no text in the version supplied. Please check that the footnote is included in the typeset manuscript.
  5. [§3, around Eq. (3.5)] The statement that 'the mass term of the δχ equation would coincide with M_s' is not immediate. A one-line derivation connecting δχ, s, Q_n, and M_s would improve clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the stability criterion (2.27) follows from an explicit eigenvalue analysis with no fitted input renamed as prediction.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained and does not reduce to its own inputs by construction. The paper defines the total entropy perturbation s, writes the linear system (2.23)-(2.25), freezes the coefficients, computes the approximate eigenvalues (2.26), and reads off the stability conditions (2.27). The compensation of negative mu_eff^2 by negative eta_Omega is explicit algebra in (1.9) and (2.20)-(2.21), with no fitted parameter subsequently rebranded as a prediction. The numerical examples are illustrations, not fits used to validate the criterion. Citations to the authors' earlier works [19,20,42] supply background stability conditions and the standard perturbation system; these are parameter-free, externally checkable results and are used as starting points, not as an unverified self-citation chain forbidding alternatives. The frozen-coefficient/adiabatic caveat is acknowledged by the authors themselves ('up to corrections in eta' - 2 eta_Omega' << 1'; 'A more precise computation can be done via the WKB approximation'); this is a rigor limitation, not a circular reduction. No step in the claimed derivation equates a prediction to an input by definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on four domain assumptions (slow-roll, super-Hubble limit, adiabatic coefficients, fidelity of the symmetric proxy class) plus standard perturbation theory. No free parameters are fitted: the stability conditions contain only background quantities (ε, η, η_Ω, M²_s) and the example parameters (α, β, initial field values) are inherited from the cited model literature, not tuned to produce the result. No entities are invented; 'ultra slow-turn' is a regime label, not a new particle, force, or conserved quantity.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Slow-roll background: ε, η ≪ 1 throughout the inflationary phase of interest
    The analysis and both stability conditions (2.27) are built on the slow-roll expansion; M²_s in (1.9) and the truncated equation (2.20) drop terms of O(η, η′_Ω, η′). The ultra slow-turn regime is defined by ε, η ≪ 1 with η_Ω ~ −O(1), so the assumption is explicit and load-bearing. (Intro, eq. (1.10); Sec. 2.)
  • domain assumption k→0 super-Hubble limit; gradient terms ∇²/a² neglected in the perturbation system (2.23)–(2.25)
    Stability is defined through the long-wavelength limit of the linearized Mukhanov-Sasaki system, following the consensus approach cited in the introduction; the criteria say nothing about scale-dependent transient growth, which the paper brackets via footnote 2 on small-scale transient violations.
  • domain assumption Adiabatic coefficients: η′ − 2η′_Ω ≪ 1 so that eigenvalues of the frozen system are reliable
    This is the load-bearing premise behind (2.26)–(2.27), stated in Sec. 2.2 ('we assume the masses to be adiabatically evolving'). If the turn rate varies on e-fold timescales, the eigenvalue criterion can misdiagnose; the paper itself sees this in the modular example, where M²_s < 0 yet inflation persists because Ω ~ 10⁻²⁵.
  • domain assumption The symmetric class (2.6)–(2.7), V = V(φ), ds² = dφ² + g(φ)²dχ², faithfully represents fibre inflation, SL(2,Z) attractors and modular inflation
    The transfer from the toy class to the real constructions is asserted ('a very good approximation to the modular, SL(2,Z) and the fibre inflation models', Sec. 2.1), not derived; the SL(2,Z) example is then treated as an instance of the class in Sec. 2.3. If the real models have sizable extra terms the approximation breaks.
  • standard math Standard cosmological perturbation theory: the Gordon-Wands-Bassett-Maartens orthonormal frame, the relation R′ = −3(Ṗ/ρ̇)S_tot (1.2), and the Klein-Gordon system (2.1)
    Background tools adopted from the cited literature without re-derivation; the paper's contribution is the stability analysis built on top of these tools.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 12441 in / 21825 out tokens · 189946 ms · 2026-08-02T19:08:30.531732+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In standard multi-field models, tachyonic isocurvature perturbations generally indicate the presence of an instability. We revisit the stability of some known counterexamples and show that, in a certain class of models that we call ultra slow-turn, an exponentially decreasing turn rate can shut off this potential instability. We argue that the stability of a given model can be correctly inferred by the total entropy perturbation, even if the effective mass squared of the isocurvature perturbation is negative. Several recent supergravity- or string-inspired models such as fibre inflation, SL(2,$\mathbb{Z}$) attractors and modular inflation fall into the ultra slow-turn class.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Pushing the Primordial Frontier: Exact Linear Solutions in Multifield Inflation

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 conditional novelty 8.0

    Closed-form mode functions and power spectrum for a two-field inflation model with arbitrary coupling λ and isocurvature mass μ, including the previously difficult strong-coupling regime.

  2. Pushing the Primordial Frontier: Cosmological Collider Signatures at Strong Mixing

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Exact analytic squeezed-limit bispectra for strongly mixed two-field inflation, nonperturbative in the curvature-isocurvature mixing λ.

  3. Pushing the Primordial Frontier: Exact Linear Solutions in Multifield Inflation

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Exact analytic solutions for coupled linear perturbations in two-field inflation provide a closed-form primordial power spectrum that interpolates weak, strong, light, and heavy field regimes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 39 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Ach´ ucarro et al.,Inflation: Theory and Observations,2203.08128

    A. Ach´ ucarro et al.,Inflation: Theory and Observations,2203.08128

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Ellis and D

    J. Ellis and D. Wands,Inflation (2023),2312.13238

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,On the present status of inflationary cosmology,Gen. Rel. Grav.57 (2025) 135 [2505.13646]. [4]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A10 [1807.06211]. [5]Atacama Cosmology Telescopecollaboration,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods andΛCDM paramet...

    arXiv 2025

  4. [6]

    Mukhanov,Physical Foundations of Cosmology, Cambridge University Press, Oxford (2005), 10.1017/CBO9780511790553

    V. Mukhanov,Physical Foundations of Cosmology, Cambridge University Press, Oxford (2005), 10.1017/CBO9780511790553

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790553 2005

  5. [7]

    Baumann,Cosmology, Cambridge University Press (7, 2022), 10.1017/9781108937092

    D. Baumann,Cosmology, Cambridge University Press (7, 2022), 10.1017/9781108937092

    doi:10.1017/9781108937092 2022

  6. [8]

    Malik and D

    K.A. Malik and D. Wands,Cosmological perturbations,Phys. Rept.475(2009) 1 [0809.4944]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  7. [9]

    Langlois,Lectures on inflation and cosmological perturbations,Lect

    D. Langlois,Lectures on inflation and cosmological perturbations,Lect. Notes Phys.800 (2010) 1 [1001.5259]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  8. [10]

    Gong,Multi-field inflation and cosmological perturbations,Int

    J.-O. Gong,Multi-field inflation and cosmological perturbations,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D26 (2016) 1740003 [1606.06971]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  9. [11]

    Gordon, D

    C. Gordon, D. Wands, B.A. Bassett and R. Maartens,Adiabatic and entropy perturbations from inflation,Phys. Rev. D63(2000) 023506 [astro-ph/0009131]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  10. [12]

    Groot Nibbelink and B.J.W

    S. Groot Nibbelink and B.J.W. van Tent,Density perturbations arising from multiple field slow roll inflation,hep-ph/0011325

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [13]

    Groot Nibbelink and B.J.W

    S. Groot Nibbelink and B.J.W. van Tent,Scalar perturbations during multiple field slow-roll inflation,Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 613 [hep-ph/0107272]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  12. [14]

    Linde,Hybrid inflation,Phys

    A.D. Linde,Hybrid inflation,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 748 [astro-ph/9307002]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  13. [15]

    Gong and T

    J.-O. Gong and T. Tanaka,A covariant approach to general field space metric in multi-field inflation,JCAP03(2011) 015 [1101.4809]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  14. [16]

    Renaux-Petel and K

    S. Renaux-Petel and K. Turzy´ nski,Geometrical Destabilization of Inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett. 117(2016) 141301 [1510.01281]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [17]

    Cicoli, V

    M. Cicoli, V. Guidetti, F.G. Pedro and G.P. Vacca,A geometrical instability for ultra-light fields during inflation?,JCAP12(2018) 037 [1807.03818]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [18]

    Cicoli, V

    M. Cicoli, V. Guidetti and F.G. Pedro,Geometrical Destabilisation of Ultra-Light Axions in String Inflation,JCAP05(2019) 046 [1903.01497]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  17. [19]

    Christodoulidis, D

    P. Christodoulidis, D. Roest and E.I. Sfakianakis,Attractors, Bifurcations and Curvature in Multi-field Inflation,JCAP08(2020) 006 [1903.03513]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  18. [20]

    Christodoulidis and R

    P. Christodoulidis and R. Rosati,(Slow-)twisting inflationary attractors,JCAP09(2023) 034 [2210.14900]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [21]

    Cicoli, V

    M. Cicoli, V. Guidetti, F. Muia, F.G. Pedro and G.P. Vacca,On the choice of entropy variables in multifield inflation,Class. Quant. Grav.40(2023) 025008 [2107.03391]. – 15 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  20. [22]

    Cicoli, V

    M. Cicoli, V. Guidetti, F. Muia, F.G. Pedro and G.P. Vacca,A fake instability in string inflation,Class. Quant. Grav.39(2022) 195012 [2107.12392]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  21. [23]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,SL(2,Z) cosmological attractors,JCAP04(2025) 045 [2408.05203]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [24]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Landscape of modular cosmology,JCAP05(2025) 037 [2411.07552]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [25]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Double Exponents inSL(2,Z)Cosmology,2412.19324

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [26]

    Carrasco, R

    J.J. Carrasco, R. Kallosh, A. Linde and D. Roest,Axion Stabilization in Modular Cosmology, 2503.14904

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [27]

    Gonzalez Quaglia, M

    R. Gonzalez Quaglia, M. Michelotti, D. Roest, J.J. Carrasco, R. Kallosh and A. Linde, Post-inflationary enhancement of adiabatic perturbations in modular cosmology,2507.03610

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [28]

    Huston and A.J

    I. Huston and A.J. Christopherson,Calculating Non-adiabatic Pressure Perturbations during Multi-field Inflation,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 063507 [1111.6919]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  27. [29]

    Huston and A.J

    I. Huston and A.J. Christopherson,Isocurvature Perturbations and Reheating in Multi-Field Inflation,1302.4298

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [30]

    Renaux-Petel and K

    S. Renaux-Petel and K. Turzynski,On reaching the adiabatic limit in multi-field inflation, JCAP06(2015) 010 [1405.6195]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  29. [31]

    Byrnes and P.S

    C.T. Byrnes and P.S. Cole,Lecture notes on inflation and primordial black holes, 12, 2021 [2112.05716]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  30. [32]

    ¨Ozsoy and G

    O. ¨Ozsoy and G. Tasinato,Inflation and Primordial Black Holes,Universe9(2023) 203 [2301.03600]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  31. [33]

    Ach´ ucarro, E.J

    A. Ach´ ucarro, E.J. Copeland, O. Iarygina, G.A. Palma, D.-G. Wang and Y. Welling, Shift-symmetric orbital inflation: Single field or multifield?,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 021302 [1901.03657]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  32. [34]

    Kaiser, E.A

    D.I. Kaiser, E.A. Mazenc and E.I. Sfakianakis,Primordial Bispectrum from Multifield Inflation with Nonminimal Couplings,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 064004 [1210.7487]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  33. [35]

    Kaiser and E.I

    D.I. Kaiser and E.I. Sfakianakis,Multifield Inflation after Planck: The Case for Nonminimal Couplings,Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 011302 [1304.0363]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  34. [36]

    Bjorkmo,Rapid-Turn Inflationary Attractors,Phys

    T. Bjorkmo,Rapid-Turn Inflationary Attractors,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 251301 [1902.10529]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [37]

    Brown,Hyperbolic Inflation,Phys

    A.R. Brown,Hyperbolic Inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 251601 [1705.03023]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  36. [38]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Escher in the Sky,Comptes Rendus Physique16(2015) 914 [1503.06785]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  37. [39]

    Ach´ ucarro, R

    A. Ach´ ucarro, R. Kallosh, A. Linde, D.-G. Wang and Y. Welling,Universality of multi-field α-attractors,JCAP04(2018) 028 [1711.09478]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [40]

    Tsamis and R.P

    N.C. Tsamis and R.P. Woodard,Improved estimates of cosmological perturbations,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 084005 [astro-ph/0307463]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  39. [41]

    Kinney,Horizon crossing and inflation with large eta,Phys

    W.H. Kinney,Horizon crossing and inflation with large eta,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 023515 [gr-qc/0503017]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  40. [42]

    Christodoulidis and J.-O

    P. Christodoulidis and J.-O. Gong,Enhanced power spectra from multi-field inflation,JCAP 08(2024) 062 [2311.04090]. – 16 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  41. [43]

    Iarygina, M.C.D

    O. Iarygina, M.C.D. Marsh and G. Salinas,Non-Gaussianity in rapid-turn multi-field inflation,JCAP03(2024) 014 [2303.14156]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  42. [44]

    Ach´ ucarro, V

    A. Ach´ ucarro, V. Atal, C. Germani and G.A. Palma,Cumulative effects in inflation with ultra-light entropy modes,JCAP02(2017) 013 [1607.08609]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  43. [45]

    Ach´ ucarro, G.A

    A. Ach´ ucarro, G.A. Palma, D.-G. Wang and Y. Welling,Origin of ultra-light fields during inflation and their suppressed non-Gaussianity,JCAP10(2020) 018 [1908.06956]. – 17 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020