pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.05379 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-05 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Correcting hybrid density functionals to model Y6 and other non-fullerene acceptors

Tom Ward , Isabel Creed , Tim Rein , Jarvist Moore Frost
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 14:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Y6non-fullerene acceptorsrange-separated hybridsdensity functional theoryexcitonssolvatochromismorganic photovoltaicsPenn model
0
0 comments X

The pith

Tuning range-separated hybrid functionals with short separation lengths accurately models Y6 excitons and solvatochromic shifts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that standard density functional theory struggles with charge-transfer states in large aggregates of Y6, a non-fullerene acceptor used in organic solar cells. By optimally tuning a range-separated hybrid functional, the authors reproduce the material's strong solvatochromic effects as arising partly from oscillator strength borrowing between charge-transfer and Frenkel excitons. They trace the short optimal range-separation parameter to the Penn model of frequency-dependent dielectric response in semiconductors. This approach yields better accuracy than untuned range-separated hybrids or global hybrids for these systems and suggests a practical way to model similar materials efficiently.

Core claim

Optimally tuning the range-separation parameter in hybrid functionals to a short value, justified by the Penn model for semiconductor dielectrics, allows accurate description of the mixing between charge-transfer and local Frenkel excitons in Y6 dimers extracted from the crystal structure, reproducing the extensive solvatochromic shifts seen in experiment.

What carries the argument

Optimally-tuned range-separated hybrid functional with reduced range-separation length, explained via the Penn model for frequency-dependent dielectric response.

If this is right

  • Non-tuned range-separated hybrids are less accurate than global hybrids for Y6 and similar materials.
  • Reducing the range-separation length improves accuracy of standard range-separated functionals without requiring a full tuning procedure.
  • Solvatochromic effects in these acceptors arise in part from oscillator strength borrowing between charge-transfer and Frenkel excitons in dimers.
  • The tuned functionals enable efficient calculations on representative aggregates for material design in organic optoelectronics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The short range-separation values may apply across a broader class of organic semiconductors with similar dielectric responses.
  • Bulk dielectric measurements could be used to estimate suitable range-separation parameters without molecule-by-molecule tuning.
  • Dimer-based calculations of exciton mixing may help predict how different crystal packings influence absorption and emission in devices.

Load-bearing premise

The tuning procedure and Penn-model explanation derived for Y6 and its dimers will generalize reliably to other non-fullerene acceptors without additional material-specific adjustments or validation.

What would settle it

Compute the lowest excited-state energies and oscillator strengths for a different non-fullerene acceptor aggregate such as ITIC using the same short range-separation parameter without retuning, and check whether the predicted solvatochromic shift matches experimental spectra.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.05379 by Isabel Creed, Jarvist Moore Frost, Tim Rein, Tom Ward.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Jablonski diagram of the D2 dimer (example of J [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparison of the energies ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recently developed fused-ring electron-acceptors such as Y6 (BTP-4F) have strong oscillator strength, good charge-carrier transport and a small bandgap. They therefore have enormous current technical application to organic optoelectronics, such as solar cells. To design new materials, it would be useful to predict the electronic structure accurately. Due to the large number of atoms involved in representative aggregates of these materials, we need an efficient electronic structure method. Standard density functional theory poorly describes charge-transfer states, and were typically parameterised for vacuum calculations of individual molecules. In this work we tune a range-separated hybrid functional for Y6, and characterise representative dimers extracted from the solid-state. We demonstrate that the extensive solvatochromic effects of Y6 are due, in part, to oscillator strength borrowing between the charge-transfer and Frenkel excitons. We provide an explanation for the short optimally-tuned range-separation parameter, based on the Penn model for the frequency dependent dielectric of a semiconductor. We caution that non-tuned range-separated hybrids are less accurate than global hybrids for these, and similar, materials. We show how reducing the range-separation length improves the accuracy of standard range-separation functionals, without an involved tuning process.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript tunes a range-separated hybrid density functional for the non-fullerene acceptor Y6 and representative dimers extracted from its crystal structure. It attributes extensive solvatochromic effects to oscillator strength borrowing between charge-transfer and Frenkel excitons. An explanation is offered for the short optimally tuned range-separation parameter based on the Penn model for the frequency-dependent dielectric response of a semiconductor. The work cautions that non-tuned range-separated hybrids are less accurate than global hybrids for these materials and shows that simply shortening the range-separation length improves accuracy without material-specific tuning.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work provides a practical correction to hybrid DFT for large aggregates of fused-ring acceptors that avoids full per-material tuning while improving description of excitonic states relevant to organic photovoltaics. Explicit credit is due for the dimer-based characterization of solid-state effects and for highlighting the limitations of standard range-separated functionals in this class of materials.

major comments (2)
  1. [Penn-model discussion] The Penn-model explanation for the short range-separation parameter (presented after the tuning results) requires explicit validation: the manuscript should recompute the frequency-dependent permittivity of the Y6 dimer or crystal (e.g., via RPA or GW) and demonstrate quantitative agreement between the extracted plasma frequency, bandgap, and static dielectric constant and the model's assumptions, rather than relying solely on the tuned parameter itself.
  2. [Conclusions and generalization] The generalization claim to other non-fullerene acceptors rests on the Y6-specific tuning and dimer results; without additional calculations on at least one or two chemically distinct NFAs (with reported errors and tuned parameters), the assertion that shortening the range-separation length is broadly transferable remains unsupported.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by including at least one key numerical result, such as the value of the tuned range-separation parameter or the reduction in error for excitation energies relative to untuned functionals.
  2. [Methods] Notation for the range-separation parameter should be defined once and used consistently; occasional switches between symbols or descriptions of 'short' versus 'long' values reduce clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly where possible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Penn-model discussion] The Penn-model explanation for the short range-separation parameter (presented after the tuning results) requires explicit validation: the manuscript should recompute the frequency-dependent permittivity of the Y6 dimer or crystal (e.g., via RPA or GW) and demonstrate quantitative agreement between the extracted plasma frequency, bandgap, and static dielectric constant and the model's assumptions, rather than relying solely on the tuned parameter itself.

    Authors: We agree that a direct RPA or GW computation of the frequency-dependent permittivity would constitute stronger validation. However, such calculations on the Y6 crystal (hundreds of atoms) remain computationally prohibitive with our available resources. The optimally tuned range-separation parameter is obtained from first-principles IP/EA matching and already encodes the effective screening; we therefore view the tuning result itself as indirect support for the Penn-model interpretation. In the revised manuscript we have (i) added experimental static dielectric constants for Y6 thin films, (ii) clarified the Penn-model assumptions and their applicability to this class of materials, and (iii) inserted an explicit caveat that the link remains qualitative. We believe these additions address the spirit of the request without overclaiming quantitative agreement. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Conclusions and generalization] The generalization claim to other non-fullerene acceptors rests on the Y6-specific tuning and dimer results; without additional calculations on at least one or two chemically distinct NFAs (with reported errors and tuned parameters), the assertion that shortening the range-separation length is broadly transferable remains unsupported.

    Authors: We accept that the original wording implied broader transferability than the Y6 data alone can rigorously support. In the revised manuscript we have (i) restricted the generalization statement to “similar fused-ring non-fullerene acceptors,” (ii) added a short paragraph explaining why the physical characteristics (small gap, high polarizability) that drive the short optimal range-separation parameter are common to this structural family, and (iii) softened the recommendation to “shortening the range-separation length is expected to improve accuracy for related materials and can be tested without full per-material tuning.” We have not performed new calculations on additional NFAs, as that would constitute a separate study; the revised text now accurately reflects the scope of the present work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Optimally-tuned range-separation parameter fitted to Y6 properties; Penn-model explanation reduces to post-hoc rationalization of the fit

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract and section on range-separation tuning / Penn-model explanation]
    "We provide an explanation for the short optimally-tuned range-separation parameter, based on the Penn model for the frequency dependent dielectric of a semiconductor."

    The range-separation parameter is first optimally tuned to reproduce Y6-specific properties (bandgap, excitonic energies, etc.). The Penn model is then applied to 'explain' the shortness of that same parameter using effective plasma frequency, bandgap, and dielectric constant extracted from the tuned calculation. Without an independent first-principles dielectric function (RPA/GW) on the identical geometry, the Penn mapping is a re-description of the fitted value rather than an external derivation.

full rationale

The paper tunes the range-separation parameter of a hybrid functional specifically to Y6 (and its dimers), then invokes the Penn model to 'explain' why that tuned value is short. Because the dielectric inputs to the Penn model are not recomputed independently (e.g., via RPA/GW on the same molecular packing), the claimed explanation is statistically forced by the tuning step itself. This matches the 'fitted input called prediction' pattern. The oscillator-strength-borrowing demonstration and accuracy comparisons for non-tuned functionals remain independent, so the circularity is partial rather than total. No self-citation load-bearing or self-definitional loops were identified in the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on tuning a free parameter in the functional to Y6 data and on standard DFT plus Penn-model assumptions; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • range-separation parameter
    Optimally tuned to reproduce properties of Y6 and extracted dimers; value is material-specific and fitted rather than derived from first principles.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Range-separated hybrid DFT approximations are valid for describing excited states in these molecular aggregates
    Invoked throughout the tuning and dimer calculations.
  • domain assumption Penn model for frequency-dependent dielectric response applies to organic semiconductors like Y6
    Used to explain the short tuned parameter.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5527 in / 1418 out tokens · 112543 ms · 2026-05-15T14:56:09.659787+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Yang, The original design principles of the y-series nonfullerene acceptors, from y1 to y6, ACS Nano 15, 18679–18682 (2021)

    Y. Yang, The original design principles of the y-series nonfullerene acceptors, from y1 to y6, ACS Nano 15, 18679–18682 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    J. Yuan, Y. Zhang, L. Zhou, G. Zhang, H.-L. Yip, T.-K. Lau, X. Lu, C. Zhu, H. Peng, P. A. Johnson, M. Leclerc, Y. Cao, J. Ulanski, Y. Li, and Y. Zou, Single-junction organic solar cell with over 15% efficiency using fused- ring acceptor with electron-deficient core, Joule 3, 1140– 1151 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    G. Han, T. Hu, and Y. Yi, Reducing the sin- glet−triplet energy gap by end‐group ￿−￿ stacking toward high‐efficiency organic photovoltaics, Advanced Materi- als 32, 10.1002/adma.202000975 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202000975 2020

  4. [4]

    M. B. Price, P. A. Hume, A. Ilina, I. Wagner, R. R. Tamming, K. E. Thorn, W. Jiao, A. Goldingay, P. J. Conaghan, G. Lakhwani, et al., Free charge photogenera- tion in a single component high photovoltaic efficiency or- ganic semiconductor, Nature Communications 13, 2827 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Y. Zhu, F. Zhao, W. Wang, Y. Li, S. Zhang, and Y. Lin, Exciton binding energy of non‐fullerene electron accep- tors, Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research 3, 10.1002/aesr.202100184 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1002/aesr.202100184 2022

  6. [6]

    L. J. F. Hart, D. G. Medranda, S. W. Yuan, L. Lindh, J. S. Müller, H. Yang, H. Gerard, T. Zhao, A. Quesada- Ramirez, M. Campoy-Quiles, M. Azzouzi, F. D. Eisner, and J. Nelson, Molecular factors controlling charge pair generation in organic photovoltaic materials, Nature Ma- terials 10.1038/s41563-026-02509-6 (2026)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41563-026-02509-6 2026

  7. [7]

    Izawa and M

    S. Izawa and M. Hiramoto, Efficient solid-state pho- ton upconversion enabled by triplet formation at an or- ganic semiconductor interface, Nature Photonics 15, 895 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Q. Si, M. Lian, and Y. Zhao, Photo-induced energy and charge transfer dynamics in y6 dimers, Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society 70, 625 (2023)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Lan, X.-N

    J.-L. Lan, X.-N. Liu, C.-N. Xiao, M.-Y. Sui, and G.-Y. Sun, Correction of the calculation method of ct state en- ergy in itic and y6 acceptor systems, Journal of Photo- chemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 456, 115821 (2024)

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Zhang, X.-K

    G. Zhang, X.-K. Chen, J. Xiao, P. C. Y. Chow, M. Ren, G. Kupgan, X. Jiao, C. C. S. Chan, X. Du, R. Xia, Z. Chen, J. Yuan, Y. Zhang, S. Zhang, Y. Liu, Y. Zou, H. Yan, K. S. Wong, V. Coropceanu, N. Li, C. J. Brabec, J.-L. Bredas, H.-L. Yip, and Y. Cao, Delocaliza- tion of exciton and electron wavefunction in non-fullerene acceptor molecules enables efficient...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17867- 2020

  11. [11]

    Giannini, D

    S. Giannini, D. J. Sowood, J. Cerdá, S. Frederix, J. Grüne, G. Londi, T. Marsh, P. Ghosh, I. Duchemin, N. C. Greenham, et al. , On the role of charge transfer excitations in non-fullerene acceptors for organic photo- voltaics, Materials Today 80, 308 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    C. Xiao, C. Li, F. Liu, L. Zhang, and W. Li, Single- crystal field-effect transistors based on a fused-ring elec- tron acceptor with high ambipolar mobilities, Journal of Materials Chemistry C 8, 5370–5374 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Kümmel, Charge-transfer excitations: a challenge for time-dependent density functional theory that has been met, Advanced Energy Materials 7, 1700440 (2017)

    S. Kümmel, Charge-transfer excitations: a challenge for time-dependent density functional theory that has been met, Advanced Energy Materials 7, 1700440 (2017)

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Bhandari and B

    S. Bhandari and B. D. Dunietz, Quantitative accuracy in calculating charge transfer state energies in solvated molecular complexes using a screened range separated hybrid functional within a polarized continuum model, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 15, 4305 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Zheng, D

    Z. Zheng, D. A. Egger, J.-L. Bredas, L. Kronik, and V. Coropceanu, Effect of solid-state polarization on charge-transfer excitations and transport levels at or- ganic interfaces from a screened range-separated hybrid functional, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 8, 3277 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    S. J. Akram, S. Meißner, and S. Kümmel, Analyzing electronic excitations and exciton binding energies in y6 8 films, Advanced Functional Materials , 2419236 (2025)

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Bhandari, M

    S. Bhandari, M. S. Cheung, E. Geva, L. Kronik, and B. D. Dunietz, Fundamental gaps of condensed-phase organic semiconductors from single-molecule calculations using polarization-consistent optimally tuned screened range- separated hybrid functionals, Journal of Chemical The- ory and Computation 14, 6287 (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Zhou, Z.-F

    Q. Zhou, Z.-F. Liu, T. J. Marks, and P. Darancet, Range- separated hybrid functionals for mixed dimensional heterojunctions: Application to phthalocyanines/mos2, APL Materials 9 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    P. Fürk, S. Mallick, T. Rath, M. Reinfelds, M. Wu, E. Spiecker, N. Simic, G. Haberfehlner, G. Kothleitner, B. Ressel, et al., The challenge with high permittivity ac- ceptors in organic solar cells: a case study with y-series derivatives, Journal of Materials Chemistry C 11, 8393 (2023)

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    P. Li, J. Fang, Y. Wang, S. Manzhos, L. Cai, Z. Song, Y. Li, T. Song, X. Wang, X. Guo, et al. , Synergistic effect of dielectric property and energy transfer on charge separation in non-fullerene-based solar cells, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 60, 15054 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Kerremans, C

    R. Kerremans, C. Kaiser, W. Li, N. Zarrabi, P. Mered- ith, and A. Armin, The optical constants of solution- processed semiconductors—new challenges with per- ovskites and non-fullerene acceptors, Advanced Optical Materials 8, 2000319 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Plasser, Theodore: A toolbox for a detailed and auto- mated analysis of electronic excited state computations, The Journal of chemical physics 152 (2020)

    F. Plasser, Theodore: A toolbox for a detailed and auto- mated analysis of electronic excited state computations, The Journal of chemical physics 152 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Plasser and H

    F. Plasser and H. Lischka, Analysis of excitonic and charge transfer interactions from quantum chemical cal- culations, Journal of chemical theory and computation 8, 2777 (2012)

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, G. Scal- mani, V. Barone, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, X. Li, M. Caricato, A. V. Marenich, J. Bloino, B. G. Janesko, R. Gomperts, B. Mennucci, H. P. Hratchian, J. V. Or- tiz, A. F. Izmaylov, J. L. Sonnenberg, D. Williams- Young, F. Ding, F. Lipparini, F. Egidi, J. G...

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    C. Xiao, C. Li, F. Liu, L. Zhang, and W. Li, Single- crystal field-effect transistors based on a fused-ring elec- tron acceptor with high ambipolar mobilities, Journal of Materials Chemistry C 8, 5370 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    Olaya-Castro and G

    A. Olaya-Castro and G. D. Scholes, Energy transfer from förster–dexter theory to quantum coherent light- harvesting, International Reviews in Physical Chemistry 30, 49 (2011)

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    Magyar and S

    R. Magyar and S. Tretiak, Dependence of spurious charge-transfer excited states on orbital exchange in tddft: large molecules and clusters, Journal of chemical theory and computation 3, 976 (2007)

    work page 2007

  28. [28]

    C. Wang, H. Dong, W. Hu, Y. Liu, and D. Zhu, Semicon- ducting ￿-conjugated systems in field-effect transistors: A material odyssey of organic electronics, Chemical Re- views 112, 2208–2267 (2011)

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    K.-H. Lin, A. Prlj, L. Yao, N. Drigo, H.-H. Cho, M. K. Nazeeruddin, K. Sivula, and C. Corminboeuf, Multi- arm and substituent effects on charge transport of or- ganic hole transport materials, Chemistry of Materials 31, 6605–6614 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    Azzouzi, J

    M. Azzouzi, J. Yan, T. Kirchartz, K. Liu, J. Wang, H. Wu, and J. Nelson, Nonradiative energy losses in bulk- heterojunction organic photovoltaics, Physical Review X 8, 10.1103/physrevx.8.031055 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.031055 2018

  31. [31]

    S. F. Nelsen, S. C. Blackstock, and Y. Kim, Estimation of inner shell marcus terms for amino nitrogen compounds by molecular orbital calculations, Journal of the Ameri- can Chemical Society 109, 677–682 (1987)

    work page 1987

  32. [32]

    J. R. Reimers, A practical method for the use of curvilin- ear coordinates in calculations of normal-mode-projected displacements and duschinsky rotation matrices for large molecules, The Journal of Chemical Physics 115, 9103– 9109 (2001)

    work page 2001

  33. [33]

    X. Miao, G. Han, and Y. Yi, Energetic inversion of sin- glet/triplet interfacial charge-transfer states for reduced energy loss in organic solar cells, Journal of Materials Chemistry A 12, 11295 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Mahadevan, T

    S. Mahadevan, T. Liu, S. M. Pratik, Y. Li, H. Y. Ho, S. Ouyang, X. Lu, H.-L. Yip, P. C. Chow, J.-L. Brédas, et al. , Assessing intra-and inter-molecular charge trans- fer excitations in non-fullerene acceptors using electroab- sorption spectroscopy, Nature Communications 15, 2393 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    D. R. Penn, Wave-number-dependent dielectric func- tion of semiconductors, Physical Review 128, 2093–2097 (1962)

    work page 2093

  36. [36]

    D. Y. Smith and E. Shiles, Finite-energy f-sum rules for valence electrons, Physical Review B 17, 4689–4694 (1978)

    work page 1978

  37. [37]

    Bechstedt, R

    F. Bechstedt, R. Del Sole, G. Cappellini, and L. Reining, An efficient method for calculating quasiparticle energies in semiconductors, Solid state communications 84, 765 (1992)

    work page 1992

  38. [38]

    Figshare data repository (2026)

    work page 2026

  39. [39]

    Imperial college research computing service (2026)

    work page 2026

  40. [40]

    Halsey-Moore, P

    C. Halsey-Moore, P. Jena, and J. T. McLeskey, Tuning range-separated dft functionals for modeling the peak ab- sorption of meh-ppv polymer in various solvents, Compu- tational and Theoretical Chemistry 1162, 112506 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    Bogo and C

    N. Bogo and C. J. Stein, Benchmarking dft-based excited-state methods for intermolecular charge-transfer excitations, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 26, 21575 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    S. H. Jeon, S. Kang, and T. Kim, Exploring an adequate dft functional to accurately describe the singlet excited state properties in hlct materials: A benchmark study, Advanced Theory and Simulations 7, 2300363 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    H. Yang, M. Azzouzi, L. Lindh, J. S. Muller, T. C. Rein, F. D. Eisner, J. M. Frost, and J. Nelson, Unveil- ing fused-ring electron acceptors’ excited-state properties via bayesian inference and temperature-dependent spec- troscopy, in preparation (2026)

    work page 2026

  44. [44]

    Kashani, Z

    S. Kashani, Z. Wang, C. Risko, and H. Ade, Relating re- S1 organization energies, exciton diffusion length and non- radiative recombination to the room temperature uv- vis absorption spectra of nf-sma, Materials Horizons 10, 443–453 (2023). FIG. S1. The singlet and triplet excited states of the D2 dimer using CAMB3LYP functional vary with basis set. S7. B...

    work page 2023