pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.09612 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-10 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall

Recognition: no theorem link

Nonlinear Hall Effect in Metal-Organic Frameworks

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 13:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords nonlinear Hall effectmetal-organic frameworksDirac conesBerry curvaturedownfolding schemespin-orbit couplingsynthetic pathways
0
0 comments X

The pith

Metal-organic frameworks can be chemically engineered for nonlinear Hall responses using symmetry and linker design.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes metal-organic frameworks as platforms for nonlinear Hall effects. It introduces an analytical downfolding scheme that reduces C3-symmetric frameworks to star- and honeycomb-lattice models while preserving Dirac features from first-principles calculations. Spin-orbit coupling and broken inversion symmetry gap the cones and create Berry-curvature hotspots that drive the nonlinear response. Symmetry analysis shows that specific synthetic choices, especially linker design, allow intrinsic tuning of the effect without external strain or substrates.

Core claim

A universal analytical downfolding scheme maps C3-symmetric metal-organic frameworks onto star- and honeycomb-lattice models, reproducing first-principles Dirac features. When spin-orbit coupling is added and inversion symmetry is broken, the Dirac cones gap, generating Berry-curvature hotspots responsible for nonlinear Hall transport. Symmetry analysis identifies tailored synthetic pathways, including linker design, as routes to engineer this transport intrinsically.

What carries the argument

The universal analytical downfolding scheme that maps C3-symmetric frameworks onto star- and honeycomb-lattice models while reproducing Dirac features and enabling Berry-curvature analysis.

If this is right

  • Nonlinear Hall transport becomes accessible through chemical synthesis choices rather than external strain or substrates.
  • Gapped Dirac cones from spin-orbit coupling and inversion breaking produce the Berry curvature needed for the effect.
  • Linker design offers a direct handle to tune the magnitude and sign of the nonlinear response.
  • The same symmetry-based mapping can guide design in other C3-symmetric framework materials.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The downfolding approach may transfer to other high-symmetry porous crystals where full first-principles calculations are costly.
  • Experimental synthesis of the proposed linkers could test whether the predicted hotspots survive real-world disorder or defects.
  • If realized, these MOFs could serve as building blocks for devices that convert electric fields into transverse currents at zero magnetic field.

Load-bearing premise

The downfolding scheme captures the essential Dirac features and Berry curvature from first-principles calculations without omitting important orbital or interaction details in real MOFs.

What would settle it

A first-principles or experimental measurement on a specific C3-symmetric MOF showing that the nonlinear Hall conductivity or Berry curvature distribution deviates from the downfolded model's predictions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.09612 by Arka Bandyopadhyay, Awadhesh Narayan, Giorgio Sangiovanni, Jagadish N S, Ronny Thomale, Sarbajit Mazumdar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) as tunable platforms for nonlinear Hall responses. A universal analytical downfolding scheme maps $C_3$-symmetric frameworks onto star- and honeycomb-lattice models, reproducing first-principles Dirac features. Spin-orbit coupling and broken inversion symmetry gap the Dirac cones, generating Berry-curvature hot spots. Symmetry analysis identifies tailored synthetic pathways, including linker design, as intrinsic routes to engineer nonlinear Hall transport beyond strain and substrate control.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) as tunable platforms for nonlinear Hall responses. A universal analytical downfolding scheme maps C3-symmetric frameworks onto star- and honeycomb-lattice models while reproducing first-principles Dirac features. Spin-orbit coupling and broken inversion symmetry gap the Dirac cones to generate Berry-curvature hot spots. Symmetry analysis identifies tailored synthetic pathways, including linker design, as intrinsic routes to engineer nonlinear Hall transport beyond strain and substrate control.

Significance. If the downfolding scheme holds and accurately reproduces the low-energy Dirac features and Berry curvature of real MOFs, the work could open chemically tunable routes to nonlinear Hall effects, shifting design from external strain/substrate control to intrinsic linker and symmetry engineering. An explicit, reproducible mapping would strengthen its utility for the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Downfolding scheme] The central claim rests on the 'universal analytical downfolding scheme' reproducing first-principles Dirac cones and Berry curvature. No explicit mapping equations, hopping parameters, or orbital projections are provided to confirm that MOF-specific linker-centered orbitals, metal d-states, or longer-range interactions are not omitted, which could alter the hot-spot magnitude and sign for the nonlinear Hall response.
  2. [Berry curvature and transport section] The assertion that SOC plus inversion breaking generates reliable Berry-curvature hot spots (and thus nonlinear Hall transport) depends on the effective star/honeycomb model capturing the correct low-energy orbital character. Without numerical validation or direct comparison to first-principles Berry curvature data, the quantitative reliability of the predicted response remains unverified.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract would benefit from naming at least one concrete C3-symmetric MOF example used to benchmark the downfolding.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the downfolding scheme and its validation.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Downfolding scheme] The central claim rests on the 'universal analytical downfolding scheme' reproducing first-principles Dirac cones and Berry curvature. No explicit mapping equations, hopping parameters, or orbital projections are provided to confirm that MOF-specific linker-centered orbitals, metal d-states, or longer-range interactions are not omitted, which could alter the hot-spot magnitude and sign for the nonlinear Hall response.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The manuscript outlines the universal analytical downfolding that maps C3-symmetric MOFs onto star- and honeycomb-lattice models while reproducing the first-principles Dirac features, but we agree that the explicit equations, hopping parameters, and orbital projections were not presented in sufficient detail. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection that derives the full mapping, lists the effective hopping values, and provides the orbital projections. We also include a direct comparison showing that linker-centered orbitals and metal d-states are retained in the low-energy subspace and that longer-range interactions remain negligible, with their effect on Berry-curvature hot spots quantified. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Berry curvature and transport section] The assertion that SOC plus inversion breaking generates reliable Berry-curvature hot spots (and thus nonlinear Hall transport) depends on the effective star/honeycomb model capturing the correct low-energy orbital character. Without numerical validation or direct comparison to first-principles Berry curvature data, the quantitative reliability of the predicted response remains unverified.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative validation against first-principles Berry curvature is necessary to confirm the reliability of the predicted nonlinear Hall response. The original text relied on the analytical reproduction of the gapped Dirac cones, but we have now added explicit numerical comparisons. The revised manuscript includes side-by-side plots and quantitative metrics of the Berry curvature obtained from the effective star/honeycomb model and from direct first-principles calculations on a representative MOF, demonstrating agreement in both the location and magnitude of the hot spots. This establishes that the low-energy orbital character is correctly captured for transport predictions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: analytical downfolding is a forward construction reproducing first-principles features by design

full rationale

The paper's central step is an explicit analytical downfolding that maps C3-symmetric MOF structures onto star- and honeycomb-lattice models chosen to reproduce the Dirac cones and Berry curvature obtained from first-principles calculations. This is a forward mapping whose target is the known first-principles dispersion; the mapping is not obtained by fitting parameters to the same data and then relabeling the fit as a prediction. No self-citation chain, uniqueness theorem imported from prior work by the same authors, or ansatz smuggled via citation is invoked as load-bearing. The subsequent symmetry analysis for synthetic pathways follows directly from the effective model without reducing to its own inputs. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external first-principles benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions from topological band theory; no free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption C3 symmetry permits a universal analytical downfolding onto star- and honeycomb-lattice models that faithfully reproduce first-principles Dirac features
    Invoked as the foundation of the mapping scheme described in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Spin-orbit coupling together with broken inversion symmetry generates Berry-curvature hot spots at the gapped Dirac cones
    Standard result from topological band theory assumed to hold after the downfolding.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5392 in / 1372 out tokens · 67701 ms · 2026-05-15T13:43:31.525016+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K. v. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine-structure con- stant based on quantized hall resistance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 494 (1980)

  2. [2]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

  3. [3]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1539 (2010)

  4. [4]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum nonlinear hall effect induced by berry curvature dipole in time-reversal in- variant materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 216806 (2015)

  5. [5]

    Du, H.-Z

    Z. Du, H.-Z. Lu, and X. Xie, Nonlinear hall effects, Na- ture Reviews Physics3, 744 (2021)

  6. [6]

    Ortix, Nonlinear hall effect with time-reversal symme- try: Theory and material realizations, Advanced Quan- tum Technologies4, 2100056 (2021)

    C. Ortix, Nonlinear hall effect with time-reversal symme- try: Theory and material realizations, Advanced Quan- tum Technologies4, 2100056 (2021)

  7. [7]

    Bandyopadhyay, N

    A. Bandyopadhyay, N. B. Joseph, and A. Narayan, Non- linear hall effects: Mechanisms and materials, Materials Today Electronics8, 100101 (2024)

  8. [8]

    Ma, S.-Y

    Q. Ma, S.-Y. Xu, H. Shen, D. MacNeill, V. Fatemi, T.-R. Chang, A. M. Mier Valdivia, S. Wu, Z. Du, C.-H. Hsu, et al., Observation of the nonlinear hall effect under time- reversal-symmetric conditions, Nature565, 337 (2019)

  9. [9]

    K. Kang, T. Li, E. Sohn, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Nonlin- ear anomalous hall effect in few-layer wte2, Nature ma- terials18, 324 (2019)

  10. [10]

    Makushko, S

    P. Makushko, S. Kovalev, Y. Zabila, I. Ilyakov, A. Pono- maryov, A. Arshad, G. L. Prajapati, T. V. A. G. de Oliveira, J.-C. Deinert, P. Chekhonin, I. Veremchuk, T. Kosub, Y. Skourski, F. Ganss, D. Makarov, and C. Or- tix, A tunable room-temperature nonlinear hall effect in elemental bismuth thin films, Nature Electronics7, 207 (2024)

  11. [11]

    L. Min, H. Tan, Z. Xie, L. Miao, R. Zhang, S. H. Lee, V. Gopalan, C.-X. Liu, N. Alem, B. Yan, and Z. Mao, Strong room-temperature bulk nonlinear hall effect in a spin-valley locked dirac material, Nature Communica- tions14, 364 (2023)

  12. [12]

    Sinha, P

    S. Sinha, P. C. Adak, A. Chakraborty, K. Das, K. Deb- nath, L. D. V. Sangani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, U. V. Waghmare, A. Agarwal, and M. M. Deshmukh, Berry curvature dipole senses topological transition in a moir´ e superlattice, Nature Physics18, 765 (2022)

  13. [13]

    X.-G. Ye, H. Liu, P.-F. Zhu, W.-Z. Xu, S. A. Yang, N. Shang, K. Liu, and Z.-M. Liao, Control over berry curvature dipole with electric field in wte 2, Physical Re- view Letters130, 016301 (2023)

  14. [14]

    Nomoto, A

    T. Nomoto, A. Kikkawa, K. Nakazawa,et al., Observa- tion of the nonlinear chiral thermoelectric hall effect in tellurium, Nature Physics (2025)

  15. [15]

    Kumar, C.-H

    D. Kumar, C.-H. Hsu, R. Sharma, T.-R. Chang, P. Yu, J. Wang, G. Eda, G. Liang, and H. Yang, Room- temperature nonlinear hall effect and wireless radiofre- quency rectification in weyl semimetal TaIrTe 4, Nature Nanotechnology16, 421 (2021)

  16. [16]

    Wang and X

    H. Wang and X. Qian, Ferroicity-driven nonlinear pho- tocurrent switching in time-reversal invariant ferroic ma- terials, Science Advances5, eaav9743 (2019)

  17. [17]

    Kim, K.-W

    J. Kim, K.-W. Kim, D. Shin, S.-H. Lee, J. Sinova, N. Park, and H. Jin, Prediction of ferroelectricity-driven Berry curvature enabling charge- and spin-controllable photocurrent in tin telluride monolayers, Nature Com- munications10, 3965 (2019)

  18. [18]

    Rangel, B

    T. Rangel, B. M. Fregoso, B. S. Mendoza, T. Mori- moto, J. E. Moore, and J. B. Neaton, Large bulk photo- voltaic effect and spontaneous polarization of single-layer monochalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 067402 (2017)

  19. [19]

    H.-C. Zhou, J. R. Long, and O. M. Yaghi, Introduction to metal–organic frameworks, Chemical Reviews112, 673 (2012)

  20. [20]

    Furukawa, K

    H. Furukawa, K. E. Cordova, M. O’Keeffe, and O. M. Yaghi, The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks, Science341, 1230444 (2013)

  21. [21]

    Jiang, X

    W. Jiang, X. Ni, and F. Liu, Exotic topological bands and quantum states in metal–organic and covalent–organic frameworks, Accounts of Chemical Research54, 416 (2021)

  22. [22]

    Z. Wang, Z. Liu, and F. Liu, Organic topological insula- tors in organometallic lattices, Nature Communications 4, 1471 (2013)

  23. [23]

    Z. F. Wang, Z. Liu, and F. Liu, Quantum anomalous hall effect in 2d organic topological insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 196801 (2013)

  24. [24]

    Z. Wang, N. Su, and F. Liu, Prediction of a two- dimensional organic topological insulator, Nano Letters 13, 2842 (2013)

  25. [25]

    T. Hu, W. Zhong, T. Zhang, W. Wang, Z. F. Wang,et al., Identifying topological corner states in two-dimensional metal-organic frameworks, Nature Communications14, 7092 (2023)

  26. [26]

    P. Tin, M. J. Jenkins, J. Xing, N. Caci, Z. Gai, R. Jin, S. Wessel, J. Krzystek, C. Li, L. L. Daemen, Y. Cheng, and Z.-L. Xue, Haldane topological spin-1 chains in a pla- nar metal-organic framework, Nature Communications 14, 5454 (2023)

  27. [27]

    Fuchs, P

    M. Fuchs, P. Liu, T. Schwemmer, G. Sangiovanni, R. Thomale, C. Franchini, and D. Di Sante, Kagome metal-organic frameworks as a platform for strongly cor- related electrons, Journal of Physics: Materials3, 025001 (2020)

  28. [28]

    L. Z. Zhang, Z. F. Wang, B. Huang, B. Cui, Z. Wang, S. X. Du, H.-J. Gao, and F. Liu, Intrin- sic two-dimensional organic topological insulators in metal–dicyanoanthracene lattices, Nano Letters16, 2072 (2016). 6

  29. [29]

    Kumar, K

    A. Kumar, K. Banerjee, A. S. Foster, and P. Liljeroth, Two-dimensional band structure in honeycomb metal– organic frameworks, Nano Letters18, 5596 (2018)

  30. [30]

    Z. Wang, Z. Liu, and F. Liu, Quantum anomalous hall ef- fect in 2d organic topological insulators, Physical Review Letters110, 196801 (2013)

  31. [31]

    Bandyopadhyay, A

    A. Bandyopadhyay, A. Majumdar, S. Chowdhury, R. Ahuja, and D. Jana, 8-16-4 graphyne: Square-lattice two-dimensional nodal line semimetal with a nontrivial topological Zak index, Physical Review B103, 075137 (2021)

  32. [32]

    Bandyopadhyay and D

    A. Bandyopadhyay and D. Jana, A review on role of tetra-rings in graphene systems and their possible ap- plications, Reports on Progress in Physics83, 056501 (2020)

  33. [33]

    Banerjee, A

    A. Banerjee, A. Bandyopadhyay, R. Sarkar, and A. Narayan, Non-hermitian topology and flat bands via an exact real-space decimation scheme, Physical Review B110, 085431 (2024)

  34. [34]

    A. Bose, A. Bandyopadhyay, and A. Narayan, Origin of flat bands and non-trivial topology in coupled kagome lattices, Communications Physics8, 519 (2025)

  35. [35]

    Kumar, J

    D. Kumar, J. Hellerstedt, B. Field, B. Lowe, Y. Yin, N. V. Medhekar, and A. Schiffrin, Manifestation of strongly correlated electrons in a 2d kagome metal–organic framework, Advanced Functional Materi- als31, 2106474 (2021)

  36. [36]

    Zhang, A

    J. Zhang, A. Shchyrba, S. Nowakowska, E. Meyer, T. A. Jung, and M. Muntwiler, Probing the spatial and mo- mentum distribution of confined surface states in a metal coordination network, Chemical Communications50, 12289 (2014)

  37. [37]

    Hern´ andez-L´ opez, I

    L. Hern´ andez-L´ opez, I. Piquero-Zulaica, C. A. Downing, M. Piantek, J. Fujii, D. Serrate, J. E. Ortega, F. Bar- tolom´ e, and J. Lobo-Checa, Searching for kagome multi- bands and edge states in a predicted organic topological insulator, Nanoscale13, 5216 (2021)

  38. [38]

    L. Yan, O. J. Silveira, B. Alldritt, S. Kezilebieke, A. S. Foster, and P. Liljeroth, Two-dimensional metal–organic framework on superconducting nbse 2, ACS Nano15, 17813 (2021)

  39. [39]

    L. Yan, O. J. Silveira, B. Alldritt, O. Krejˇ c´ ı, A. S. Fos- ter, and P. Liljeroth, Synthesis and local probe gating of a monolayer metal–organic framework, Advanced Func- tional Materials31, 2100519 (2021)

  40. [40]

    L. Z. Zhang, Z. F. Wang, B. Huang, B. Cui, Z. Wang, S. X. Du, H.-J. Gao, and F. Liu, Intrin- sic two-dimensional organic topological insulators in metal–dicyanoanthracene lattices, Nano Letters16, 2072 (2016)

  41. [41]

    J.-S. You, S. Fang, S.-Y. Xu, E. Kaxiras, and T. Low, Berry curvature dipole current in the transition metal dichalcogenides family, Phys. Rev. B98, 121109 (2018)

  42. [42]

    Battilomo, N

    R. Battilomo, N. Scopigno, and C. Ortix, Berry curva- ture dipole in strained graphene: A fermi surface warping effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 196403 (2019)

  43. [43]

    T. Low, Y. Jiang, and F. Guinea, Topological currents in black phosphorus with broken inversion symmetry, Phys. Rev. B92, 235447 (2015)

  44. [44]

    Y. Zhao, J. Cao, Z. Zhang, S. Li, Y. Li, F. Ma, and S. A. Yang, Berry curvature dipole and nonlinear hall effect in two-dimensional nb 2n+1sinte4n+2, Phys. Rev. B107, 205124 (2023)

  45. [45]

    Bandyopadhyay, N

    A. Bandyopadhyay, N. B. Joseph, and A. Narayan, Elec- trically switchable giant berry curvature dipole in sil- icene, germanene and stanene, 2D Materials9, 035013 (2022)

  46. [46]

    Cirera, A

    B. Cirera, A. S´ anchez-Grande, B. De la Torre, J. Santos, S. Edalatmanesh, E. Rodr´ ıguez-S´ anchez, K. Lauwaet, B. Mallada, R. Zboˇ ril, R. Miranda,et al., Tailoring topo- logical order andπ-conjugation to engineer quasi-metallic polymers, Nature nanotechnology15, 437 (2020)

  47. [47]

    Kawai, O

    S. Kawai, O. Krejci, A. S. Foster, R. Pawlak, F. Xu, L. Peng, A. Orita, and E. Meyer, Diacetylene linked anthracene oligomers synthesized by one-shot homocou- pling of trimethylsilyl on cu(111), ACS Nano12, 8791 (2018)

  48. [48]

    L. Wei, X. Zhang, and M. Zhao, Spin-polarized dirac cones and topological nontriviality in a metal–organic framework ni 2c24s6h12, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics18, 8059 (2016)

  49. [49]

    Y. Yan, F. Liu, W. Tang, H. X. Wong, B. Qie, S. G. Louie, and F. R. Fischer, Engineering phase-frustration- induced flat bands in an aza-triangulene covalent kagome lattice, Nature Materials , 1 (2026)

  50. [50]

    L. Yang, J. Dong, Z. Wang, D. Li, C. Chen, B. Huang, D. Liu, and B. Cui, Breathing-controlled pure orbital and nonlinear hall effects in 2d organic kagome frameworks, Nano Letters26, 1455 (2026)

  51. [51]

    Adjizian, P

    J.-J. Adjizian, P. Briddon, B. Humbert, J.-L. Duvail, P. Wagner, C. Adda, and C. Ewels, Dirac cones in two- dimensional conjugated polymer networks, Nature Com- munications5, 5842 (2014)

  52. [52]

    A. A. Soluyanov and D. Vanderbilt, Computing topolog- ical invariants without inversion symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 83, 235401 (2011)

  53. [53]

    R. Yu, X. L. Qi, A. Bernevig, Z. Fang, and X. Dai, Equiv- alent expression ofz 2 topological invariant for band in- sulators using the non-abelian berry connection, Phys. Rev. B84, 075119 (2011)

  54. [54]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo,et al., Quantum espresso: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter21, 395502 (2009)

  55. [55]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli,et al., Advanced capabilities for mate- rials modelling with Quantum ESPRESSO, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter29, 465901 (2017)

  56. [56]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Physical Review Letters77, 3865 (1996)

  57. [57]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Physi- cal Review B50, 17953 (1994)

  58. [58]

    H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Special points for brillouin-zone integrations, Physical Review B13, 5188 (1976)

  59. [59]

    S. S. Tsirkin, High performance wannier interpolation of berry curvature and related quantities with wannierberri code, npj Computational Materials7, 33 (2021)

  60. [60]

    Coh and D

    S. Coh and D. Vanderbilt, Python tight binding (pythtb) (2022). Supplemental Material: Nonlinear Hall Effect in Metal–Organic Frameworks Sarbajit Mazumdar, 1,∗ Jagadish N S, 2 Awadhesh Narayan, 3 Giorgio Sangiovanni, 1 Ronny Thomale, 1 and Arka Bandyopadhyay 1,† 1Institut f¨ ur Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik and W¨ urzburg-Dresden Cluster of Excellen...