Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 106 references

Polarization of the parent, daughter, and muon sharply reshapes every major observable in the doubly charmed baryon decay Ξ_cc++ → Ξ_c+ ℓ ν.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 20:34 UTC pith:YMLGNLGX

load-bearing objection Solid, incremental polarization phenomenology for Ξ_cc++ o Ξ_c+ ℓν that is ready for referees; form-factor dependence is real but already partially quantified by the authors. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2603.15199 v2 pith:YMLGNLGX submitted 2026-03-16 hep-ph

The effects of polarization on the observables in the decay Xi_(cc)⁺⁺ rightarrow Xi_(c)⁺ bar{ell}ν_(ell)

Qazi Maaz Us Salam , Anamta Asif , Ishtiaq Ahmed , Rizwan Khalid This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords doubly charmed baryonssemileptonic decaypolarization asymmetriesforward-backward asymmetrylepton flavor universalityQCD sum rulesform factorsΞ_cc++
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates how the spin orientations of the parent baryon Ξ_cc++, the daughter baryon Ξ_c+, and the charged lepton change the differential branching ratio, the forward-backward asymmetry, and the polarization asymmetries of the semileptonic decay Ξ_cc++ → Ξ_c+ ℓ ν. Using six form factors taken from QCD sum rules, it shows that longitudinal and transverse helicity states produce large, distinctive hierarchies and zero-crossings that the unpolarized rate alone cannot reveal. It also defines new polarization ratios and polarization-asymmetry ratios that largely cancel form-factor uncertainties, and it evaluates the lepton-flavor-universality ratio R_Ξ_c+(µ/e) ≈ 1.002. The claim is that these polarized observables are clean enough to serve as precision tests of the Standard Model in the doubly heavy baryon sector once experimental samples become available.

Core claim

When the parent, daughter, or muon is polarized longitudinally or transversely, the q^{2}-dependent branching ratios and forward-backward asymmetries of Ξ_cc++ → Ξ_c+ ℓ ν reorder by factors of order ten and exhibit distinct zero crossings; the newly defined polarization ratios R and R_P remain stable under form-factor variation and therefore supply practical SM probes.

What carries the argument

The six vector and axial form factors F_i(q^{2}), G_i(q^{2}) of the hadronic matrix element, combined with explicit longitudinal and transverse spin projectors, generate the polarized differential rates D_k^(m,n), the polarization asymmetries P^(m,n), and the ratios R and R_P.

Load-bearing premise

The six form factors and their polynomial coefficients taken from an earlier QCD-sum-rule calculation must be accurate enough that the predicted polarization hierarchies and ratios survive realistic interference effects.

What would settle it

A future measurement of any of the binned polarization asymmetries P^(m,n) or the ratios R_P in the mid-q^{2} interval [0.4, 0.8] GeV^{2} that falls outside the paper’s quoted ranges would falsify the central claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies polarization effects in the semileptonic decay Ξ_cc++ → Ξ_c+ ℓ̄ ν_ℓ (c → s). Using the six QCD-sum-rule form factors of Azizi et al. (polynomial parametrization Eq. 3.1 and Table 2), the authors compute q^{2}-dependent differential branching ratios D^(m,n)_k, forward–backward asymmetries FBA^(m,n)_k, and polarization asymmetries P^(m,n) for longitudinal and transverse polarizations of the parent baryon, daughter baryon, and muon (one particle polarized at a time). They introduce polarization ratios R^(m,m')_nn'[j] and polarization-asymmetry ratios R_P, evaluate the LFU ratio R_Ξ_c+(μ/e) ≈ 1.002, and present correlation plots among the polarized observables. Analytic polarized amplitudes are collected in Appendix B; numerical results include form-factor uncertainty bands and an explicit interference re-evaluation (Fig. 9). The central claim is that these polarized observables and ratios are sensitive to spin configurations and therefore useful SM probes.

Significance. If the form-factor inputs remain reliable, the work supplies a systematic map of how longitudinal and transverse polarizations of Ξ_cc++, Ξ_c+, and the muon reshape differential rates, FBAs, and asymmetries in a doubly-charmed baryon channel that is experimentally accessible at LHCb. The newly defined ratios R and especially R_P are constructed to reduce form-factor sensitivity and are therefore potentially useful clean observables. The complete polarized amplitudes in Appendix B and the explicit demonstration of interference effects in Fig. 9 are concrete technical contributions that later lattice or sum-rule updates can reuse. The LFU result near unity is a useful SM benchmark for this mode. The paper does not claim new physics; its value is phenomenological completeness for a channel whose polarization structure has not previously been mapped in this detail.

major comments (2)
  1. The claimed hierarchies (e.g. D^(ℓ,L)_+ ≫ D^(ℓ,L)_- in Fig. 2a, the near-zero unpolarized FBAs, and the robustness of the “clean” R_P ratios in Fig. 16) rest entirely on the six form factors and their polynomial coefficients taken from Azizi et al. (Table 2 + Eq. 3.1). The paper itself shows that naïve ±1σ bands miss interference (text around Fig. 9 and the shaded envelopes of Fig. 9). Because only one special case is re-evaluated with a full envelope, it remains unclear whether the reported orderings and the small uncertainty of R_P survive a complete interference-aware error treatment for all observables. A systematic re-propagation (or at least a statement of which hierarchies remain stable under the full envelope) is needed before the “ready experimental probe” claim can be taken at face value.
  2. Section 3.4.2–3.4.3 and Tables 8–9 present many polarization ratios and R_P combinations, yet the selection criteria for which ratios are “clean” (Fig. 14 vs Fig. 13) and which are experimentally most promising are not stated quantitatively. Without a clear ranking (e.g. by relative form-factor uncertainty or by expected reconstruction efficiency), the large set of ratios risks appearing as an exhaustive catalogue rather than a focused set of recommended observables. A short prioritization paragraph would strengthen the phenomenological message.
minor comments (5)
  1. Notation for the differential branching ratio switches between D, 𝒟, and script variants across figures and tables; a single consistent symbol would improve readability.
  2. In several places (e.g. captions of Figs. 2–7) the phrase “integrated over cos θ” is repeated for both D and FBA; for FBA the integration is already part of the definition (Eqs. 2.6–2.7), so the wording can be tightened.
  3. Table 1 quotes |V_sc| rather than the conventional |V_cs|; the numerical value is correct but the label should be standardized.
  4. The zero branching fraction in the normal (N) direction is stated without a short kinematic or helicity argument; a one-sentence explanation would help non-specialist readers.
  5. A few typographical inconsistencies appear (e.g. “Gev” vs “GeV”, occasional missing spaces around ±). A careful proof-reading pass is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: observables are computed from external QCD-sum-rule form factors without re-fitting or self-referential definitions.

full rationale

The paper takes the six form factors F_i(q^{2}), G_i(q^{2}) and their polynomial coefficients (Eq. 3.1 and Table 2) as external inputs from the independent QCD-sum-rule calculation of Azizi et al. [44]. All subsequent quantities—the polarized differential branching ratios D^(m,n)_k, FBAs, polarization asymmetries P^(m,n), ratios R and R_P, and the LFU ratio R_Ξc+(μ/e)—are obtained by direct substitution of those form factors into the helicity amplitudes (Appendix B) and the definitions (Eqs. 2.4–2.10). No parameter is fitted to data in the present work, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors’ prior papers, and no observable is defined in terms of itself. Self-citations that appear (e.g., [93], [94]) concern unrelated B-physics analyses and are not load-bearing for the Ξ_cc results. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained given the cited form-factor inputs; any residual uncertainty is a correctness/robustness issue, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on the Standard-Model V–A current, the six QCD-sum-rule form factors (treated as external inputs with their published uncertainties), and the usual kinematic projectors for longitudinal/transverse polarization. No new dynamical entities are introduced; the free parameters are those already fixed by the external form-factor fit.

free parameters (1)
  • Form-factor normalizations F_i(0), G_i(0) and polynomial coefficients α1–α4 = Table 2 (e.g. F1(0) = −0.37 ± 0.13, …)
    Taken from the external QCD-sum-rule fit of Azizi et al.; their central values and errors propagate into every observable.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption The weak interaction is pure V–A at the quark level (c → s ℓ ν).
    Used from the outset to write the amplitude (Eq. 2.1) and to parametrize the hadronic matrix elements with six form factors.
  • domain assumption The six form factors computed in QCD sum rules accurately describe the Ξ_cc++ → Ξ_c+ transition.
    All numerical results rest on the parametrization and values of Table 2 taken from Ref. [44].
  • standard math Standard Lorentz decomposition and spin projectors for baryon and lepton polarizations.
    Eqs. (2.2)–(2.3) and the replacement of the density matrix by (1 + γ5 S̸)/2.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 42009 in / 2183 out tokens · 28029 ms · 2026-07-14T20:34:45.604849+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the effects of polarization on several physical observables in the semileptonic decay $\Xi_{cc}^{++} \rightarrow \Xi_c^{+} \bar{\ell}\nu_{\ell}$. We analyze the polarization effects of the particles involved in the decay, namely $\Xi_{cc}^{++}$, $\Xi_c^{+}$, and the charged muon $\ell$. Using the form factors obtained from QCD sum rules, we compute the $q^{2}$-dependent observables including the differential branching ratio, forward-backward asymmetry, and polarization asymmetries for both longitudinal and transverse polarization states. We also define and examine several polarization ratios and discuss correlations among different observables. In addition, we evaluate the lepton flavor universality ratio defined as $\mathcal{R}_{\Xi_c^+}(\mu/e) \equiv \mathcal{D}(\Xi_{cc}^{++}\to \Xi_c^+\mu^+\nu_\mu)/\mathcal{D}(\Xi_{cc}^{++}\to \Xi_c^+e^+\nu_e)$ and analyze its behavior over the available dynamical range. Our results show that these observables are quite sensitive to polarization effects, and can provide suitable probes for testing Standard Model predictions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 97 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Gell-Mann,A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons,Phys

    M. Gell-Mann,A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons,Phys. Lett.8(1964) 214. [2]SELEXcollaboration,First Observation of the Doubly Charmed BaryonΞ + cc,Phys. Rev. Lett.89(2002) 112001 [hep-ex/0208014]. [3]LHCbcollaboration,Observation of the doubly charmed baryonΞ ++ cc ,Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017) 112001 [arXiv:1707.01621]. [4]LHCbcollaboration,Search for...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1964

  2. [2]

    Shekari Tousi and K

    M. Shekari Tousi and K. Azizi,Properties of doubly heavy spin-1 2 baryons: The ground and excited states,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 054005 [arXiv:2401.07151]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Aliev, K

    T.M. Aliev, K. Azizi and M. Savci,Doubly Heavy Spin–1/2 Baryon Spectrum in QCD, Nucl. Phys. A895(2012) 59 [arXiv:1205.2873]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    Aliev, K

    T.M. Aliev, K. Azizi and M. Savci,The masses and residues of doubly heavy spin-3/2 baryons,J. Phys. G40(2013) 065003 [arXiv:1208.1976]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    Aliev and S

    T.M. Aliev and S. Bilmis,The mass and residues of radially and orbitally excited doubly heavy baryons in QCD,Nucl. Phys. A984(2019) 99 [arXiv:1904.11279]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Aliyev and S

    T. Aliyev and S. Bilmiş,Properties of doubly heavy baryons in QCD,Turk. J. Phys.46 (2022) 1 [arXiv:2203.02965]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Lü, K.-L

    Q.-F. Lü, K.-L. Wang, L.-Y. Xiao and X.-H. Zhong,Mass spectra and radiative transitions of doubly heavy baryons in a relativized quark model,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 114006 [arXiv:1708.04468]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Wang,Analysis of the doubly heavy baryon states and pentaquark states with QCD sum rules,Eur

    Z.-G. Wang,Analysis of the doubly heavy baryon states and pentaquark states with QCD sum rules,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 826 [arXiv:1808.09820]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    Ebert, R.N

    D. Ebert, R.N. Faustov, V.O. Galkin and A.P. Martynenko,Mass spectra of doubly heavy baryons in the relativistic quark model,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 014008 [hep-ph/0201217]. 28

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  10. [10]

    Zhang and M.-Q

    J.-R. Zhang and M.-Q. Huang,Doubly heavy baryons in QCD sum rules,Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 094007 [arXiv:0810.5396]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  11. [11]

    Wang,Analysis of the 1 2 + doubly heavy baryon states with QCD sum rules,Eur

    Z.-G. Wang,Analysis of the 1 2 + doubly heavy baryon states with QCD sum rules,Eur. Phys. J. A45(2010) 267 [arXiv:1001.4693]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  12. [12]

    Rahmani, H

    S. Rahmani, H. Hassanabadi and H. Sobhani,Mass and decay properties of double heavy baryons with a phenomenological potential model,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 312

    2020

  13. [13]

    Yao,Masses and sigma terms of doubly charmed baryons up toO(p4)in manifestly Lorentz-invariant baryon chiral perturbation theory,Phys

    D.-L. Yao,Masses and sigma terms of doubly charmed baryons up toO(p4)in manifestly Lorentz-invariant baryon chiral perturbation theory,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 034012 [arXiv:1801.09462]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    Padmanath,Heavy baryon spectroscopy from lattice QCD, 5, 2019 [arXiv:1905.10168]

    M. Padmanath,Heavy baryon spectroscopy from lattice QCD, 5, 2019 [arXiv:1905.10168]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Brown, W

    Z.S. Brown, W. Detmold, S. Meinel and K. Orginos,Charmed bottom baryon spectroscopy from lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 094507 [arXiv:1409.0497]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  16. [16]

    Shah and A.K

    Z. Shah and A.K. Rai,Excited state mass spectra of doubly heavyΞbaryons,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 129 [arXiv:1702.02726]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    Giannuzzi,Doubly heavy baryons in a Salpeter model with AdS/QCD inspired potential, Phys

    F. Giannuzzi,Doubly heavy baryons in a Salpeter model with AdS/QCD inspired potential, Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 094002 [arXiv:0902.4624]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  18. [18]

    Z. Shah, K. Thakkar and A.K. Rai,Excited State Mass spectra of doubly heavy baryonsΩcc, Ωbb andΩ bc,Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 530 [arXiv:1609.03030]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  19. [19]

    Valcarce, H

    A. Valcarce, H. Garcilazo and J. Vijande,Towards an understanding of heavy baryon spectroscopy,Eur. Phys. J. A37(2008) 217 [arXiv:0807.2973]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  20. [20]

    Wang,Analysis of the1/2 − and3/2 − heavy and doubly heavy baryon states with QCD sum rules,Eur

    Z.-G. Wang,Analysis of the1/2 − and3/2 − heavy and doubly heavy baryon states with QCD sum rules,Eur. Phys. J. A47(2011) 81 [arXiv:1003.2838]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  21. [21]

    Yoshida, E

    T. Yoshida, E. Hiyama, A. Hosaka, M. Oka and K. Sadato,Spectrum of heavy baryons in the quark model,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 114029 [arXiv:1510.01067]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  22. [22]

    Ortiz-Pacheco and R

    E. Ortiz-Pacheco and R. Bijker,Masses and radiative decay widths of S- and P-wave singly, doubly, and triply heavy charm and bottom baryons,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 054014 [arXiv:2307.04939]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Qiu and D.-L

    P.-C. Qiu and D.-L. Yao,Chiral effective Lagrangian for doubly charmed baryons up to O(q4),Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 034006 [arXiv:2012.11117]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Aliev, K

    T.M. Aliev, K. Azizi and M. Savcı,Mixing angle of doubly heavy baryons in QCD,Phys. Lett. B715(2012) 149 [arXiv:1205.6320]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  25. [25]

    Aliev and K

    T.M. Aliev and K. Şimşek,Strong coupling constants of doubly heavy baryons with vector mesons in QCD,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 976 [arXiv:2009.03464]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Olamaei, K

    A.R. Olamaei, K. Azizi and S. Rostami,Strong coupling constants of the doubly heavyΞQQ Baryons withπMeson,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 613 [arXiv:2003.12723]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    Aliev and K

    T.M. Aliev and K. Şimşek,Strong vertices of doubly heavy spin-3/2–spin-1/2baryons with light mesons in light-cone QCD sum rules,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 054044 [arXiv:2011.07150]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Aliev, T

    T.M. Aliev, T. Barakat and K. Şimşek,StrongB∗ QQ′BQQ′Vvertices and the radiative decays ofB ∗ QQ →B QQγin the light-cone sum rules,Eur. Phys. J. A57(2021) 160 [arXiv:2101.10264]. 29

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    Olamaei, K

    A.R. Olamaei, K. Azizi and S. Rostami,Strong vertices of doubly heavy spin-3/2 baryons with light pseudoscalar mesons,Chin. Phys. C45(2021) 113107 [arXiv:2102.03852]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    Alrebdi, T.M

    H.I. Alrebdi, T.M. Aliev and K. Şimşek,Determination of the strong vertices of doubly heavy baryons with pseudoscalar mesons in QCD,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 074007 [arXiv:2008.05098]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    Azizi, A.R

    K. Azizi, A.R. Olamaei and S. Rostami,Strong interaction of doubly heavy spin-3/2 baryons with light vector mesons,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 1196 [arXiv:2011.02919]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    Qin, Y.-J

    Q. Qin, Y.-J. Shi, W. Wang, G.-H. Yang, F.-S. Yu and R. Zhu,Inclusive approach to hunt for the beauty-charmed baryonsΞbc,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) L031902 [arXiv:2108.06716]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Xiao, K.-L

    L.-Y. Xiao, K.-L. Wang, Q.-f. Lu, X.-H. Zhong and S.-L. Zhu,Strong and radiative decays of the doubly charmed baryons,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 094005 [arXiv:1708.04384]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    Xiao, Q.-F

    L.-Y. Xiao, Q.-F. Lü and S.-L. Zhu,Strong decays of the 1P and 2D doubly charmed states, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 074005 [arXiv:1712.07295]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    H.-S. Li, L. Meng, Z.-W. Liu and S.-L. Zhu,Radiative decays of the doubly charmed baryons in chiral perturbation theory,Phys. Lett. B777(2018) 169 [arXiv:1708.03620]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  36. [36]

    Zhao,Weak decays of doubly heavy baryons: the1/2→3/2case,Eur

    Z.-X. Zhao,Weak decays of doubly heavy baryons: the1/2→3/2case,Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) 756 [arXiv:1805.10878]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  37. [37]

    Xing and Z.-X

    Z.-P. Xing and Z.-X. Zhao,Weak decays of doubly heavy baryons: the FCNC processes, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 056002 [arXiv:1807.03101]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [38]

    Jiang, B

    L.-J. Jiang, B. He and R.-H. Li,Weak decays of doubly heavy baryons:Bcc → B cV,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 961 [arXiv:1810.00541]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  39. [39]

    Tousi, K

    M.S. Tousi, K. Azizi and H.R. Moshfegh,Investigation of the semileptonic decay Ξ++ cc →Ξ + c ¯ℓνℓ within QCD sum rules,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 114001 [arXiv:2409.00241]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Gerasimov and A.V

    A.S. Gerasimov and A.V. Luchinsky,Weak decays of doubly heavy baryons: Decays to a system ofπmesons,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 073015 [arXiv:1905.11740]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Wang, F.-S

    W. Wang, F.-S. Yu and Z.-X. Zhao,Weak decays of doubly heavy baryons: the1/2→1/2 case,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 781 [arXiv:1707.02834]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    Sharma and R

    N. Sharma and R. Dhir,Estimates of W-exchange contributions toΞcc decays,Phys. Rev. D 96(2017) 113006 [arXiv:1709.08217]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  43. [43]

    Patel and K

    K. Patel and K. Thakkar,Transition Properties of Doubly Heavy Baryons,Int. J. Theor. Phys.64(2025) 129 [arXiv:2408.00335]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Gutsche, M.A

    T. Gutsche, M.A. Ivanov, J.G. Körner and V.E. Lyubovitskij,Novel ideas in nonleptonic decays of double heavy baryons,Particles2(2019) 339 [arXiv:1905.06219]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    Gutsche, M.A

    T. Gutsche, M.A. Ivanov, J.G. Körner, V.E. Lyubovitskij and Z. Tyulemissov,Analysis of the semileptonic and nonleptonic two-body decays of the double heavy charm baryon states Ξ++ cc ,Ξ + cc andΩ + cc,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 114037 [arXiv:1911.10785]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  46. [46]

    H.-W. Ke, F. Lu, X.-H. Liu and X.-Q. Li,Study onΞcc →Ξ c andΞ cc →Ξ ′ c weak decays in the light-front quark model,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 140 [arXiv:1912.01435]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    Cheng, G

    H.-Y. Cheng, G. Meng, F. Xu and J. Zou,Two-body weak decays of doubly charmed baryons,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 034034 [arXiv:2001.04553]. 30

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Hu, R.-H

    X.-H. Hu, R.-H. Li and Z.-P. Xing,A comprehensive analysis of weak transition form factors for doubly heavy baryons in the light front approach,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 320 [arXiv:2001.06375]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    Li, J.-J

    R.-H. Li, J.-J. Hou, B. He and Y.-R. Wang,Weak Decays of Doubly Heavy Baryons: Bcc → BD (∗),Chin. Phys. C45(2021) 043108 [arXiv:2010.09362]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  50. [50]

    Han, R.-X

    J.-J. Han, R.-X. Zhang, H.-Y. Jiang, Z.-J. Xiao and F.-S. Yu,Weak decays of bottom-charm baryons:B bc → B bP,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 539 [arXiv:2102.00961]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    Wang, Z.-P

    W. Wang, Z.-P. Xing and J. Xu,Weak Decays of Doubly Heavy Baryons: SU(3) Analysis, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 800 [arXiv:1707.06570]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    Y.-J. Shi, W. Wang, Y. Xing and J. Xu,Weak Decays of Doubly Heavy Baryons: Multi-body Decay Channels,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 56 [arXiv:1712.03830]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [53]

    Ivanov, J.G

    M.A. Ivanov, J.G. Körner and V.E. Lyubovitskij,Nonleptonic Decays of Doubly Charmed Baryons,Phys. Part. Nucl.51(2020) 678

    2020

  54. [54]

    Y.-J. Shi, W. Wang, Z.-X. Zhao and U.-G. Meißner,Towards a Heavy Diquark Effective Theory for Weak Decays of Doubly Heavy Baryons,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 398 [arXiv:2002.02785]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    Hu, Y.-L

    X.-H. Hu, Y.-L. Shen, W. Wang and Z.-X. Zhao,Weak decays of doubly heavy baryons: ”decay constants”,Chin. Phys. C42(2018) 123102 [arXiv:1711.10289]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  56. [56]

    Li and C.-D

    R.-H. Li and C.-D. Lu,Search for doubly heavy baryon via weak decays, in53rd Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions, p. 115, 2018 [arXiv:1805.09064]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  57. [57]

    Y.-J. Shi, W. Wang and Z.-X. Zhao,QCD Sum Rules Analysis of Weak Decays of Doubly-Heavy Baryons,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 568 [arXiv:1902.01092]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    Y.-J. Shi, Y. Xing and Z.-X. Zhao,Light-cone sum rules analysis ofΞQQ′q →Λ Q′ weak decays,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 501 [arXiv:1903.03921]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  59. [59]

    Gutsche, M.A

    T. Gutsche, M.A. Ivanov, J.G. Körner and V.E. Lyubovitskij,Decay chain information on the newly discovered double charm baryon stateΞ++ cc ,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 054013 [arXiv:1708.00703]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  60. [60]

    Gutsche, M.A

    T. Gutsche, M.A. Ivanov, J.G. Körner, V.E. Lyubovitskij and Z. Tyulemissov,Ab initio three-loop calculation of theW-exchange contribution to nonleptonic decays of double charm baryons,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 056013 [arXiv:1812.09212]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    Shekari Tousi and K

    M. Shekari Tousi and K. Azizi,Semileptonic decays of doubly charmed or bottom baryons to single heavy baryons,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 074012 [arXiv:2504.17030]

    arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Özdem,Magnetic moments of doubly heavy baryons in light-cone QCD,J

    U. Özdem,Magnetic moments of doubly heavy baryons in light-cone QCD,J. Phys. G46 (2019) 035003 [arXiv:1804.10921]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  63. [63]

    Özdem,Magnetic dipole moments of the spin-3 2 doubly heavy baryons,Eur

    U. Özdem,Magnetic dipole moments of the spin-3 2 doubly heavy baryons,Eur. Phys. J. A 56(2020) 34 [arXiv:1906.08353]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    Berezhnoy, A.K

    A.V. Berezhnoy, A.K. Likhoded and A.V. Luchinsky,Doubly heavy baryons at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 113004 [arXiv:1809.10058]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  65. [65]

    Shifman, A.I

    M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov,QCD and Resonance Physics. Theoretical Foundations,Nucl. Phys. B147(1979) 385

    1979

  66. [66]

    Shifman, A.I

    M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov,QCD and Resonance Physics: Applications,Nucl. Phys. B147(1979) 448. 31

    1979

  67. [67]

    Aliev, K

    T.M. Aliev, K. Azizi and M. Savci,Analysis of theΛb →Λℓ +ℓ− decay in QCD,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 056006 [arXiv:1001.0227]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  68. [68]

    Aliev, K

    T.M. Aliev, K. Azizi and A. Ozpineci,Radiative Decays of the Heavy Flavored Baryons in Light Cone QCD Sum Rules,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 056005 [arXiv:0901.0076]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  69. [69]

    Agaev, K

    S.S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu,StrongZ+ c (3900)→J/ψπ +;η cρ+ decays in QCD,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 074002 [arXiv:1601.03847]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  70. [70]

    Azizi, Y

    K. Azizi, Y. Sarac and H. Sundu,Analysis ofP+ c (4380)andP + c (4450)as pentaquark states in the molecular picture with QCD sum rules,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 094016 [arXiv:1612.07479]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  71. [71]

    Y.-M. Wang, H. Zou, Z.-T. Wei, X.-Q. Li and C.-D. Lu,The Transition form-factors for semi-leptonic weak decays ofJ/ψin QCD sum rules,Eur. Phys. J. C54(2008) 107 [arXiv:0707.1138]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  72. [72]

    Shekari Tousi and K

    M. Shekari Tousi and K. Azizi,Examining possible doubly topped baryon configurations, arXiv:2601.11985

    arXiv

  73. [73]

    Aliev, E

    T.M. Aliev, E. Askan and A. Ozpineci,Multipole moments of double heavyJP = 3 2 + baryons,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1479 [arXiv:2504.10199]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Neishabouri and K

    Z. Neishabouri and K. Azizi,Investigation of the semileptonic decaysΞ(′) b →Ξ (′) c ℓ¯νℓ,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 054009 [arXiv:2503.12390]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Lu, G.-L

    J. Lu, G.-L. Yu, D.-Y. Chen, Z.-G. Wang and B. Wu,Analysis of the semileptonic decays Λb →Λ cl¯νl andΞ b →Ξ cl¯νl in QCD sum rules,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1382 [arXiv:2508.11900]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    Ahmadi, Z.R

    M. Ahmadi, Z.R. Najjar and K. Azizi,Study of the semileptonic decayΛ→p ℓ¯νℓ in QCD, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 094035 [arXiv:2509.23421]

    arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    Yu, Z.-G

    G.-L. Yu, Z.-G. Wang, J. Lu, B. Wu, P. Yang and Z. Zhou,Analysis of the semileptonic decays ofΞ cc andΩ cc baryons in QCD sum rules,arXiv:2601.06427

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [78]

    Crivellin, C

    A. Crivellin, C. Greub and A. Kokulu,ExplainingB→Dτ ν,B→D ∗τ νandB→τ νin a 2HDM of type III,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 054014 [arXiv:1206.2634]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  79. [79]

    Sakaki and H

    Y. Sakaki and H. Tanaka,Constraints on the charged scalar effects using the forward-backward asymmetry onB→D (∗)τ¯ντ,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 054002 [arXiv:1205.4908]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  80. [80]

    Sakaki, M

    Y. Sakaki, M. Tanaka, A. Tayduganov and R. Watanabe,Probing New Physics withq2 distributions in ¯B→D (∗)τ¯ν,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 114028 [arXiv:1412.3761]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

Showing first 80 references.