pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.15236 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Spin-valley physics in anomalous thermoelectric responses of the spin-orbit coupled α-T₃ system with broken time-reversal symmetry

Lakpa Tamang , Tutul Biswas
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 10:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords alpha-T3 latticespin-valley polarizationanomalous Hall effectNernst effectspin-orbit interactionstaggered magnetizationthermoelectric responsetime-reversal symmetry breaking
0
0 comments X

The pith

The α-T₃ system with spin-orbit interaction and staggered magnetization reaches nearly complete spin and valley polarizations in its anomalous thermoelectric responses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This work studies the anomalous Hall and Nernst effects in the α-T₃ lattice when spin-orbit coupling and a time-reversal symmetry breaking magnetization are included. It resolves the responses into spin and valley channels and shows that the model parameter α together with the magnetization strength can be tuned so that both polarizations approach full polarization over large areas of parameter space. A sympathetic reader would care because such high polarization would mean the material can act as a natural filter for spin and valley information using only temperature gradients, without needing magnetic fields. The peak and dip features in the Nernst signals are traced back to the Hall conductivities using the Mott relation, which connects the two in the low-temperature limit.

Core claim

The paper establishes that the interplay of spin-orbit interaction, staggered magnetization, and the α parameter enables efficient tuning of spin- and valley-dependent Hall and Nernst signals in the α-T₃ system. Both the spin and valley polarizations, extracted from the resolved Nernst conductivities, attain nearly complete polarization over extended regions of the parameter space. The spin-valley physics of these responses is explained both with and without the magnetization term.

What carries the argument

Spin- and valley-resolved Nernst conductivities calculated from the tight-binding Hamiltonian with added spin-orbit and magnetization terms, connected to the Hall responses by the Mott relation.

If this is right

  • The magnetization term introduces highly tunable spin and valley polarizations in the Nernst response.
  • Both spin and valley polarizations can reach nearly complete values over broad parameter ranges.
  • The peak-dip features in Nernst responses follow directly from the corresponding Hall responses via the Mott relation.
  • The system exhibits distinct spin-valley Hall and Nernst physics depending on the presence or absence of magnetization.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the model holds in real materials, temperature-gradient driven devices could separate spins and valleys efficiently.
  • Similar polarization effects might appear in other 2D lattices when symmetry is broken in comparable ways.
  • Testing the polarization at higher temperatures or with disorder would check how robust the complete polarization regions are.
  • The approach may link to studies of topological transitions in related honeycomb lattices.

Load-bearing premise

The specific tight-binding model with spin-orbit and staggered magnetization terms must accurately represent the electronic properties of the real α-T₃ material.

What would settle it

An experiment on a fabricated α-T₃ sample showing spin or valley polarization well below near-complete levels in the predicted parameter regimes would disprove the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.15236 by Lakpa Tamang, Tutul Biswas.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (Color online) Schematic illustration of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (Color online) Low-energy dispersions in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (Color online) Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: (Color online) (a) Valley Hall conductivity and (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: (a) Spin summed AHC for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: (Color online) Dependence of the (a) Valley Hall [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: (Color online) (a) Valley Hall conductivity and (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: (Color online) Dependence of the (a) Valley Hall [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: (Color online) (a) Spin summed ANC in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: (Color online) (a) Valley Nernst conductivity and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: (Color online) Contour plot of the spin polarization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: (Color online) Contour plot of the valley [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: (Color online) Contour plot of (a) Spin polarization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_17.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We extract spin-valley physics in the anomalous Hall and Nernst responses of the spin-orbit coupled $\alpha$-$T_3$ system in the presence of a time-reversal symmetry breaking staggered magnetization. We show that the interplay between the SOI, magnetization, and a model parameter $\alpha$ for the $\alpha$-$T_3$ lattice enables efficient tuning of spin- and valley-dependent Hall and Nernst signals. The spin-valley physics of the Hall and Nernst responses in the absence and presence of the magnetization are well explained. The peak-dip features of the Nernst responses are also understood from the corresponding Hall responses through the Mott relation. We find that the magnetization introduces highly tunable spin and valley polarizations, which are calculated from the spin- and valley-resolved Nernst conductivities. It is shown that both the spin and valley polarizations can attain nearly complete polarization over extended regions of the parameter space. Overall, our results highlight the $\alpha$-$T_3$ lattice as a promising platform for spin and valley caloritronic applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the spin-valley physics in the anomalous Hall and Nernst responses of the spin-orbit coupled α-T3 lattice with a staggered magnetization that breaks time-reversal symmetry. Using linear response theory and the Kubo formula, the authors compute spin- and valley-resolved conductivities, apply the Mott relation to interpret Nernst peak-dip features from the Hall responses, and show that both spin and valley polarizations (defined as normalized differences of the resolved Nernst conductivities) reach near-unity values over extended regions of the parameter space spanned by the lattice parameter α and the magnetization amplitude.

Significance. If the calculations hold, the work identifies the α-T3 lattice as a tunable platform for spin-valley caloritronics, with concrete predictions for near-complete polarizations arising from the interplay of spin-orbit coupling, magnetization, and lattice geometry. The direct computation of polarizations from resolved conductivities and the explicit use of the Mott relation to link Hall and Nernst features constitute clear strengths, providing falsifiable, model-based guidance for experiments in related 2D materials.

minor comments (3)
  1. The introduction should include a brief schematic of the α-T3 lattice to clarify the role of the parameter α and the positions of the A, B, and C sublattices.
  2. Numerical details such as k-point mesh density and broadening parameter used in the Kubo formula evaluations should be stated explicitly in the methods or results section to support reproducibility.
  3. Figure captions for the polarization plots should specify the exact threshold (e.g., |P| > 0.95) used to identify 'nearly complete' polarization and the corresponding intervals of α and magnetization.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary and significance assessment of our work on spin-valley physics in the anomalous thermoelectric responses of the spin-orbit coupled α-T3 system. The recommendation for minor revision is noted, and we appreciate the recognition of the tunable polarizations and the use of the Mott relation as strengths. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The central results follow from direct numerical evaluation of spin- and valley-resolved Nernst conductivities via the Kubo formula applied to the given tight-binding Hamiltonian (with SOI and staggered magnetization terms). Polarization is then obtained from the standard normalized difference P = (N+ − N−)/(N+ + N−). The Mott relation is invoked only to interpret peak-dip features in the Nernst signal, not to derive the polarization values themselves. No parameters are fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions, no load-bearing self-citations justify uniqueness or ansatzes, and no known empirical pattern is merely renamed. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained within the model and standard linear-response formulas.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a tight-binding Hamiltonian whose parameters (α, magnetization amplitude, spin-orbit strength) are varied numerically; standard assumptions of linear response and band-structure calculation are invoked without independent verification in the abstract.

free parameters (2)
  • α
    Lattice geometry parameter that interpolates the α-T₃ structure and is scanned to tune responses.
  • staggered magnetization amplitude
    Strength of time-reversal breaking term that controls spin-valley splitting and is varied to achieve high polarizations.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Linear response theory applies to the thermoelectric conductivities
    Invoked to compute Hall and Nernst signals from the band structure.
  • domain assumption Mott relation connects Nernst and Hall responses
    Used to explain peak-dip features without additional derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5506 in / 1368 out tokens · 80413 ms · 2026-05-15T10:20:13.840749+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 92 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Case I: Hall conductivities in the absence of the staggered magnetization (M= 0) In this case, the anomalous Hall response is solely determined by the Berry curvature generated by the SOI. In Fig. 5(a), we show the variation of the Hall conductivity for a given valley summed over the spin index, i.e.,σ η,+ H =σ η,↑ H +σ η,↓ H , along with the VHC, as func...

    work page

  2. [2]

    sgn(∆d)− ∆dp (µ2 + ∆2 d) # .(22) Similarly, for theα= 0case, the AHC is obtained as ση,σ H = +(−)η e2 2h

    Case II: Hall Conductivities in the Presence of Magnetization (M̸= 0) Here, we discuss the characteristics of the Hall conductivities in the presence of a staggered magnetizationM̸= 0. As observed earlier, the magnetization modifies the magnitudes and positions of the energy gaps. It also redistributes the Berry curvature around the valleys, thereby signi...

    work page

  3. [3]

    10(b) shows the SNC at individual val- leys and the total SNC, consideringα= 0.3

    Case I: Nernst Conductivities in the absence of Magnetization (M= 0) Figure 10(a) depicts the chemical potential dependence of the spin-summed ANC in individual valleys along with the VNC, while Fig. 10(b) shows the SNC at individual val- leys and the total SNC, consideringα= 0.3. The VNC and SNC are explicitly given byα v N =α K,+ N −α K′,+ N and αs N =α...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Nernst Conductivities in the Presence of Magnetization (M̸= 0) The presence of a staggered magnetization leads to a drastic change in the Nernst response of the system as shown in Fig

    work page

  5. [5]

    13,KandK ′ valleys contribute dif- ferently due to breaking of the TRS

    As shown in Fig. 13,KandK ′ valleys contribute dif- ferently due to breaking of the TRS. The peak-dip feature of αK,+ N is more prominent than that ofα K′,+ N , thus leading to a nonvanishing total ANC (not shown) in addition to the finite VNC (dashed line). Figure 13(b) shows that SNCs at individ- ual valleys are completely different. In fact the total S...

    work page

  6. [6]

    A Wolf, D

    S. A Wolf, D. D. Awschalom, R. A. Buhrman, J. M. Daughton, S. V on Molnar, M. L. Roukes, A. Y . Chtchelkanova, and D. M. Treger, Spintronics: A Spin- Based Electronics Vision for the Future, Science294, 1488 (2001)

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    Zutic, J

    I. Zutic, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Spintronics: Fundamen- tals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 323 (2004)

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    D. D. Awschalom and M. E. Flatte, Challenges for semiconduc- tor spintronics, Nat. Phys.3, 153 (2007)

    work page 2007

  9. [9]

    Fert, Nobel Lecture: Origin, development, and future of spintronics, Rev

    A. Fert, Nobel Lecture: Origin, development, and future of spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1517 (2008)

    work page 2008

  10. [10]

    D. D. Awschalom and N. Samarth, Spintronics without mag- netism, Physics2, 50 (2009)

    work page 2009

  11. [11]

    Aharony, O

    A. Aharony, O. Entin-Wohlman, Y . Tokura, and S. Katsumoto, Spin filtering by a periodic spintronic device, Phys. Rev. B78, 125328 (2008)

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    Z. G. Zhu, Selective spin injection controlled by electrical way in ferromagnet/quantum dot/semiconductor system, Phys. Lett. A372, 695 (2008)

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    J. E. Hirsch, Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1834 (1999)

    work page 1999

  14. [14]

    E. G. Mishchenko, A. V . Shytov, and B. I. Halperin, Spin Cur- rent and Polarization in Impure Two-Dimensional Electron Sys- tems with Spin-Orbit Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 226602 (2004)

    work page 2004

  15. [15]

    Raimondi, C

    R. Raimondi, C. Gorini, M. Dzierzawa, and P. Schwab, Current- induced spin polarization and the spin Hall effect: A quasiclas- sical approach, Solid State Commun.144, 524 (2007)

    work page 2007

  16. [16]

    S. D. Ganichev, E. L. Ivchenko, V . V . Bel’kov, S. A. Tarasenko, M. Sollinger, D. Weiss, W. Wegscheider, and W. Prettl, Spin- galvanic effect, Nature417, 153 (2002)

    work page 2002

  17. [17]

    M. J. Stevens, A. L. Smirl, R. D. R. Bhat, A. Najmaie, J. E. Sipe, and H. M. van Driel, Quantum Interference Control of Ballis- tic Pure Spin Currents in Semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 136603 (2003)

    work page 2003

  18. [18]

    Hübner, W

    J. Hübner, W. W. Rühle, M. Klude, D. Hommel, R. D. R. Bhat, J. E. Sipe, and H. M. van Driel, Direct Observation of Optically Injected Spin-Polarized Currents in Semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 216601 (2003)

    work page 2003

  19. [19]

    Z. Ma, R. L. Wu, Y . B. Yu, and M. Wang, V oltage-controllable generator of pure spin current: A three-terminal model, J. Appl. Phys.116, 043706 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    Datta and B

    S. Datta and B. Das, Electronic analog of the electro-optic mod- ulator, Appl. Phys. Lett.56, 665 (1990)

    work page 1990

  21. [21]

    Gardelis, C

    S. Gardelis, C. G. Smith, C. H. W. Barnes, E. H. Linfield, and D. A. Ritchie, Spin-valve effects in a semiconductor field-effect transistor: A spintronic device, Phys. Rev. B60, 7764 (1999)

    work page 1999

  22. [22]

    Schmidt, D

    G. Schmidt, D. Ferrand, L. W. Molenkamp, A. T. Filip, and B. J. van Wees, Fundamental obstacle for electrical spin injec- tion from a ferromagnetic metal into a diffusive semiconductor, Phys. Rev. B62, R4790(R) (2000)

    work page 2000

  23. [23]

    C. M. Hu, J. Nitta, A. Jensen, J. B. Hansen, and H. Takayanagi, Spin-polarized transport in a two-dimensional electron gas with interdigital-ferromagnetic contacts, Phys. Rev. B63, 125333 (2001)

    work page 2001

  24. [24]

    Tombros, C

    N. Tombros, C. Jozsa, M. Popinciuc, H. T. Jonkman, and B. J. V . Wees, Electronic spin transport and spin precession in single graphene layers at room temperature, Nature448, 571 (2007)

    work page 2007

  25. [25]

    Zhang, K

    Q. Zhang, K. S. Chan, and Z. Lin, Spin current generation by adiabatic pumping in monolayer graphene, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 032106 (2011)

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    Souma and M

    S. Souma and M. Ogawa, Pure spin current induced by adia- batic quantum pumping in zigzag-edged graphene nanoribbons, Appl. Phys. Lett.104, 183103 (2014)

    work page 2014

  27. [27]

    Mohammadkhani, B

    R. Mohammadkhani, B. Abdollahipour, and M. Alidoust, Strain-controlled spin and charge pumping in graphene devices via spin-orbit coupled barriers, EPL111, 67005 (2015)

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    G. E. W. Bauer, A. H. MacDonald, and S. Maekawa, Spin Caloritronics, Solid State Commun.150, 459 (2010)

    work page 2010

  29. [29]

    G. E.W. Bauer, E. Saitoh, and B. J. van Wees, Spin caloritronics, Nat. Mater.11, 391 (2012)

    work page 2012

  30. [30]

    Uchida, S

    K. Uchida, S. Takahashi, K. Harii, J. Ieda, W. Koshibae, K. Ando, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Observation of the spin See- beck effect, Nature455, 778 (2008). 12

    work page 2008

  31. [31]

    Uchida, J

    K. Uchida, J. Xiao, H. Adachi, J. Ohe, S. Takahashi, J. Ieda, T. Ota, Y . Kajiwara, H. Umezawa, H. Kawai, G. E. W Bauer, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Spin Seebeck insulator, Nat. Mater9, 894 (2010)

    work page 2010

  32. [32]

    C. M. Jaworski, J. Yang, S. Mack, D. D. Awschalom, J. P. Here- mans, and R. C. Myers, Observation of the spin-Seebeck effect in a ferromagnetic semiconductor, Nat. Mater9, 898 (2010)

    work page 2010

  33. [33]

    A. D. Avery, M. R. Pufall, and B. L. Zink, Observation of the Planar Nernst Effect in Permalloy and Nickel Thin Films with In-Plane Thermal Gradients, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 196602 (2012)

    work page 2012

  34. [34]

    S. Y . Huang, W. G. Wang, S. F. Lee, J. Kwo, and C. L. Chien, Intrinsic Spin-Dependent Thermal Transport, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 216604 (2011)

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    X. Chen, L. Zhang, and H. Guo, Valley caloritronics and its realization by graphene nanoribbons, Phys. Rev. B92, 155427 (2015)

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    D. Xiao, W. Yao, and Q. Niu, Valley-Contrasting Physics in Graphene: Magnetic Moment and Topological Transport, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 236809 (2007)

    work page 2007

  37. [37]

    Fujita, M

    T. Fujita, M. B. A. Jalil, and S. G. Tan, Valley filter in strain engineered graphene, Appl. Phys. Lett.97, 043508 (2010)

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    W. Yao, D. Xiao, and Q. Niu, Valley-dependent optoelectronics from inversion symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. B77, 235406 (2008)

    work page 2008

  39. [39]

    Saxena, A

    R. Saxena, A. Saha, and S. Rao, Conductance, val- ley and spin polarizations, and tunneling magnetoresistance in ferromagnetic-normal-ferromagnetic junctions of silicene, Phys. Rev. B92, 245412 (2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    K. F. Mak, K. L. McGill, J. Park, and P. L. McEuen, The valley Hall effect in MoS2 transistors, Science344, 1489 (2014)

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    Xiao, G-B

    D. Xiao, G-B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Coupled Spin and Valley Physics in Monolayers of MoS 2 and Other Group- VI Dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 196802 (2012)

    work page 2012

  42. [42]

    Jungwirth, Q

    T. Jungwirth, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, Anomalous Hall Effect in Ferromagnetic Semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 207208 (2002)

    work page 2002

  43. [43]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous Hall Effect, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1539 (2010)

    work page 2010

  44. [44]

    X-Q. Yu, Z-G. Zhu, G. Su, and A.-P. Jauho, Thermally Driven Pure Spin and Valley Currents via the Anomalous Nernst Effect in Monolayer Group-VI Dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 246601 (2015)

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    Sharma, Tunable topological Nernst effect in two- dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenides, Phys

    G. Sharma, Tunable topological Nernst effect in two- dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B98, 075416 (2018)

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    D. L. Bergman and V . Oganesyan, Theory of Dissipationless Nernst Effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 0666011 (2010)

    work page 2010

  47. [47]

    Yokoyama and S

    T. Yokoyama and S. Murakami, Transverse magnetic heat trans- port on the surface of a topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B83, 161407 (R) (2011)

    work page 2011

  48. [48]

    D. Xiao, Y . Yao, Z. Fang, and Q. Niu, Berry-Phase Effect in Anomalous Thermoelectric Transport, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 026603 (2006)

    work page 2006

  49. [49]

    M. T. Dau, C. Vergnaud, A. Marty, C. Beigne, S. Gambarelli, V . Maurel, T. Journot, B. Hyot, T. Guillet, B. Grevin, H. Okuno, and M. Jamet, The valley Nernst effect in WSe2, Nat. Commun. 10, 5796 (2010)

    work page 2010

  50. [50]

    Z. A. Xu, N. P. Ong, Y . Wang, T. Kakeshita, and S. Uchida, V ortex-like excitations and the onset of superconducting phase fluctuation in underdoped La 2−xSrxCuO4, Nature406, 486 (2000)

    work page 2000

  51. [51]

    Y . Wang, Z. A. Xu, T. Kakeshita, S. Uchida, S. Ono, Y . Ando, and N. P. Ong, Onset of the vortexlike Nernst signal above Tc in La 2−xSrxCuO4 and Bi 2Sr2−yLayCuO6, Phys. Rev. B64, 224519 (2001)

    work page 2001

  52. [52]

    Onose, Y

    Y . Onose, Y . Shiomi, and Y . Tokura, Lorenz Number Deter- mination of the Dissipationless Nature of the Anomalous Hall Effect in Itinerant Ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 016601 (2008)

    work page 2008

  53. [53]

    Hirschberger, R

    M. Hirschberger, R. Chisnell, Y . S. Lee, and N. P. Ong, Thermal Hall Effect of Spin Excitations in a Kagome Magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 106603 (2015)

    work page 2015

  54. [54]

    H. Doki, M. Akazawa, H-Y . Lee, J. H. Han, K. Sugii, M. Shi- mozawa, N. Kawashima, M. Oda, H. Yoshida, and M. Ya- mashita, Spin Thermal Hall Conductivity of a Kagome Anti- ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 097203 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    X. Zhou, H. Liu, W. Wu, K. Jiang, Y . Shi, Z. Li, Y . Sui, J. Hu, and J. Luo, Anomalous thermal Hall effect and anomalous Nernst effect of CsV3Sb5, Phys. Rev. B105, 205104 (2022)

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    Illes, Properties of theα-T 3 model, PhD Thesis, University of Guelph (2017)

    E. Illes, Properties of theα-T 3 model, PhD Thesis, University of Guelph (2017)

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    Sutherland, Localization of electronic wave functions due to local topology, Phys

    B. Sutherland, Localization of electronic wave functions due to local topology, Phys. Rev. B34, 5208 (1986)

    work page 1986

  58. [58]

    Vidal, R

    J. Vidal, R. Mosseri, and B. Doucot, Aharonov-Bohm Cages in Two-Dimensional Structures, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 5888 (1998)

    work page 1998

  59. [59]

    C. C. Abilio, P. Butaud, T. Fournier, B. Pannetier, J. Vidal, S. Tedesco, and B. Dalzotto, Magnetic Field Induced Localization in a Two-Dimensional Superconducting Wire Network, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 5102 (1999)

    work page 1999

  60. [60]

    Raoux, M

    A. Raoux, M. Morigi, J. N. Fuchs, F. Piechon, and G. Mon- tambaux, From Dia- to Paramagnetic Orbital Susceptibility of Massless Fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 026402 (2014)

    work page 2014

  61. [61]

    Illes, J

    E. Illes, J. P. Carbotte, and E. J. Nicol, Hall quantization and optical conductivity evolution with variable Berry phase in the α-T3 model, Phys. Rev. B92, 245410 (2015)

    work page 2015

  62. [62]

    Biswas and T

    T. Biswas and T. K. Ghosh, Magnetotransport properties of the α-T3 model, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter28, 495302 (2016)

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    Illes and E

    E. Illes and E. J. Nicol, Klein tunneling in theα-T 3 model, Phys. Rev. B95, 235432 (2017)

    work page 2017

  64. [64]

    SK. F. Islam and P. Dutta, Valley-polarized magnetoconductiv- ity and particle-hole symmetry breaking in a periodically mod- ulatedα-T 3 lattice, Phys. Rev. B96, 045418 (2017)

    work page 2017

  65. [65]

    Biswas and T

    T. Biswas and T. K. Ghosh, Dynamics of a quasiparticle in the α-T3 model: role of pseudospin polarization and transverse magnetic field on zitterbewegung, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 30, 075301 (2018)

    work page 2018

  66. [66]

    Balassis, D

    A. Balassis, D. Dahal, G. Gumbs, A. Iurov, D. Huang and O. Roslyak, Magnetoplasmons for theα-T 3 model with filled Lan- dau levels, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter32, 485301 (2020)

    work page 2020

  67. [67]

    Iurov, G

    A. Iurov, G. Gumbs, and D. Huang, Many-body effects and optical properties of single and double layerα-T 3 lattices, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter32, 415303 (2020)

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    Iurov, L

    A. Iurov, L. Zhemchuzhna, G. Gumbs, D. Huang, D. Dahal, and Y . Abranyos, Finite-temperature plasmons, damping, and col- lective behavior in theα-T 3 model, Phys. Rev. B105, 245414 (2022)

    work page 2022

  69. [69]

    Illes and E

    E. Illes and E. J. Nicol, Magnetic properties of theα-T 3 model: Magneto-optical conductivity and the Hofstadter but- terfly, Phys. Rev. B94, 125435 (2016)

    work page 2016

  70. [70]

    A. D. Kovacs, G. David, B. Dora, and J. Cserti, Frequency- dependent magneto-optical conductivity in the generalizedα- T3 model, Phys. Rev. B95, 035414 (2017)

    work page 2017

  71. [71]

    Y . R. Chen, Y . Xu, J. Wang, J. F. Liu, and Z. Ma, Enhanced magneto-optical response due to the flat band in nanoribbons made from theα-T 3 lattice, Phys. Rev. B99, 045420 (2019)

    work page 2019

  72. [72]

    L. Chen, J. Zuber, Z. Ma, and C. Zhang, Nonlinear optical re- sponse of theα-T 3 model due to the nontrivial topology of the 13 band dispersion, Phys. Rev. B100, 035440 (2019)

    work page 2019

  73. [73]

    D. O. Oriekhov and V . P. Gusynin, RKKY interaction in a doped pseudospin-1 fermion system at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. B101, 235162 (2020)

    work page 2020

  74. [74]

    Roslyak, G

    O. Roslyak, G. Gumbs, A. Balassis, and H. Elsayed, Effect of magnetic field and chemical potential on the RKKY interaction in theα-T 3 lattice, Phys. Rev. B103, 075418 (2021)

    work page 2021

  75. [75]

    J. Wang, J. F. Liu, and C. S. Ting, Recovered minimal conduc- tivity in theα-T 3 model, Phys. Rev. B101, 205420 (2020)

    work page 2020

  76. [76]

    M. W. Alam, B. Souayeh, and SK. F. Islam, Enhancement of thermoelectric performance of a nanoribbon made ofα-T 3 lat- tice, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter31485303 (2019)

    work page 2019

  77. [77]

    Duan, Seebeck and Nernst effects of pseudospin-1 fermions in theα-T 3 model under magnetic fields, Phys

    W. Duan, Seebeck and Nernst effects of pseudospin-1 fermions in theα-T 3 model under magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B108, 155428 (2023)

    work page 2023

  78. [78]

    A. Yan, X. Wang, and Y . X. Li, Nernst and seebeck effects in α-T3 lattice, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter36305705 (2024)

    work page 2024

  79. [79]

    K. W. Lee, P.-H. Fu, and Y . S. Ang, Interplay between Haldane and modified Haldane models inα-T 3 lattice: Band structures, phase diagrams, and edge states, Phys. Rev. B109, 235105 (2024)

    work page 2024

  80. [80]

    Wang and Y

    F. Wang and Y . Ran, Nearly flat band with Chern numberC= 2 on the dice lattice, Phys. Rev. B84, 241103(R) (2011)

    work page 2011

Showing first 80 references.