pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.15710 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-16 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A Special E₆to G(2) times SU(3)_A Embedding for Standard Model and Dark Matter

Nicol\`o Masi
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 10:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords E6 grand unificationspecial embeddingG(2) dark sectorgauge coupling unificationdark glueballsproton decay suppressionvectorlike exoticsintermediate scale breaking
0
0 comments X

The pith

A special non-regular embedding of E6 first breaks to G(2) times SU(3)_A, recovering the Standard Model plus a confining dark sector at low energies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a grand unified model in which the exceptional group E6 undergoes an initial symmetry breaking to the product G(2) times SU(3)_A. G(2) functions as a hidden strong sector whose gluons confine into heavy dark glueballs, while SU(3)_A supplies the progenitor of the electroweak group through its t8 generator for hypercharge. The 27 representation of E6 contains one complete Standard Model family, with exotic states acquiring ultraheavy vectorlike masses. A scalar potential is built for the three Higgs sectors, yielding the spectrum of heavy gauge bosons and a one-loop gauge-coupling trajectory that reaches E6 unification. The embedding suppresses tree-level leptoquark couplings, eliminating rapid proton decay, and the orthogonal group structure keeps the dark sector secluded from visible interactions.

Core claim

The special non-regular embedding realizes the breaking chain E6 to G(2) times SU(3)_A, followed by G(2) to SU(3)_C and SU(3)_A to SU(2)_L times U(1)_Y. Hypercharge is identified with the t8 generator of SU(3)_A, the Standard Model Higgs doublet sits inside a larger exceptional representation, and the scalar potential produces consistent heavy vector masses together with one-loop unification. All non-Standard Model states remain invisible to colliders, while the G(2) sector confines into dark glueballs with no tree-level communication to the visible sector.

What carries the argument

The special (non-regular) E6 to G(2) times SU(3)_A embedding, which fixes the hypercharge assignment from the t8 generator and organizes the full breaking chain while suppressing tree-level leptoquark operators.

If this is right

  • One complete Standard Model family fits inside the E6 27, with all exotic components lifted to ultraheavy vectorlike masses.
  • The gauge couplings run to a common E6 unification point at one loop once the intermediate scales from the breaking chain are included.
  • Heavy gauge bosons and non-Standard Model Higgs fields remain invisible at collider energies.
  • The G(2) sector confines into heavy dark glueballs that form a secluded dark matter component.
  • Monopole relics are diluted by the cosmological history, removing overclosure problems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The orthogonal separation between G(2) and SU(3)_A may allow independent tuning of the dark confinement scale without affecting electroweak precision observables.
  • If the dark glueballs are sufficiently heavy, their relic abundance could be set by freeze-out or by the reheating temperature after inflation.
  • The absence of tree-level leptoquarks suggests that any observed proton decay would have to arise from higher-dimensional operators suppressed by the E6 scale.

Load-bearing premise

The special non-regular embedding of E6 into G(2) times SU(3)_A exists and permits a complete breaking chain that avoids unwanted tree-level leptoquark couplings.

What would settle it

A direct measurement showing that the three Standard Model gauge couplings fail to meet at a single scale near 10^16 GeV after accounting for the intermediate G(2) and SU(3)_A thresholds would falsify the unification claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.15710 by Nicol\`o Masi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: One-loop running of gauge couplings with exact piecewise solutions. The legend labels the inverse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

I developed a grand unified framework based on a special (non-regular) embedding of the exceptional group $E_6$ in which the first stage of symmetry breaking chain realizes $E_6\to G(2) \times SU(3)_A$. The exceptional factor $G(2)$ plays the role of a hidden strong sector, while $SU(3)_A$ acts as a progenitor of the electroweak gauge group. Subsequent breaking steps, $G(2)\to SU(3)_C$ and $SU(3)_A\to SU(2)_L\times U(1)_Y$, recover the Standard Model at low energies while preserving a confining dark gauge sector. Hypercharge is defined from the $t_{8}$ generator of $SU(3)_A$, fixing the electroweak coupling normalization and identifying the Standard Model Higgs doublet within a larger exceptional representation. The special embedding naturally suppresses tree-level leptoquark couplings that typically mediate proton decay in regular grand unified theories. The scalar potential for the three Higgs sectors has been constructed, deriving the heavy gauge-bosons spectrum and presenting a consistent one-loop running of the gauge couplings across the intermediate scales, which is shown to satisfy $E_6$ unification. The $E_6$ $\mathbf{27}$ representation neatly packages one SM family, while exotic states are lifted vectorlike and made ultraheavy. All non-Standard Model Higgs fields and \textit{broken} massive vectors are found to be invisible to colliders searches. The $G(2)$ gluons ensemble confines into heavy dark glueballs without communications with $SU(3)_A$ and $E_6$ sectors. Cosmological history is analyzed in details, including topological defects, inflation and reheating, demonstrating that monopole relics are naturally diluted. The resulting framework provides a minimal unified, self-consistent exceptional apparatus which includes the Standard Model and a dark matter sector which is secluded by the group-theoretic orthogonality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a grand unified theory via a special non-regular embedding of E6 into G(2) × SU(3)_A, with G(2) as a hidden confining sector and SU(3)_A breaking to SU(2)_L × U(1)_Y. It claims the 27 of E6 yields one SM family plus vectorlike exotics, hypercharge is fixed from the SU(3)_A t8 generator, tree-level leptoquark couplings are absent, the scalar potential for three Higgs sectors produces the heavy gauge-boson spectrum, one-loop unification holds across intermediate scales, and cosmology (including monopole dilution) is consistent, yielding a secluded dark-matter sector of G(2) glueballs.

Significance. If the embedding and branching rules are rigorously established and the unification is not the result of scale fitting, the framework would supply a minimal exceptional-group unification that naturally sequesters a dark sector by group-theoretic orthogonality while suppressing proton decay at tree level. The explicit construction of the scalar potential and the analysis of topological defects are strengths that could be verified with standard group-theory and renormalization-group tools.

major comments (2)
  1. [Embedding and branching rules (abstract and §2)] The manuscript asserts the existence of a non-regular E6 → G(2) × SU(3)_A embedding that decomposes the 27 to produce exactly one SM family plus heavy vectorlike exotics and correctly identifies hypercharge from the SU(3)_A t8 generator, yet provides neither the explicit embedding matrices nor the branching rules for the 27 and adjoint representations. This step is load-bearing for the central claim that no light exotics or tree-level leptoquark operators appear.
  2. [Gauge-coupling running and unification (abstract and §4)] The one-loop unification is stated to be satisfied after choosing intermediate scales, but the explicit beta-function coefficients, threshold corrections, and numerical values of the intermediate scales are not displayed. Without these, it is impossible to confirm that the meeting point is a genuine prediction rather than a fit.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Scalar potential] Notation for the three Higgs sectors and their vacuum expectation values should be introduced with a clear table or diagram to aid readability.
  2. [Cosmology] The cosmological section would benefit from a brief summary table listing the sequence of phase transitions and the resulting defect dilution factors.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We appreciate the referee's thorough review and valuable suggestions. The comments have helped us improve the clarity and rigor of the manuscript. Below we provide point-by-point responses to the major comments, and we have made the corresponding revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Embedding and branching rules (abstract and §2)] The manuscript asserts the existence of a non-regular E6 → G(2) × SU(3)_A embedding that decomposes the 27 to produce exactly one SM family plus heavy vectorlike exotics and correctly identifies hypercharge from the SU(3)_A t8 generator, yet provides neither the explicit embedding matrices nor the branching rules for the 27 and adjoint representations. This step is load-bearing for the central claim that no light exotics or tree-level leptoquark operators appear.

    Authors: We agree that providing the explicit embedding matrices and branching rules is necessary to substantiate the central claims. In the revised manuscript, we have added a detailed subsection in Section 2 that presents the embedding of E6 into G(2) × SU(3)_A, including the explicit generator mappings and the complete branching rules for both the 27 and the adjoint 78 representations. These additions confirm that the 27 decomposes into one Standard Model family plus heavy vectorlike exotics, with hypercharge correctly identified from the t8 generator, and that tree-level leptoquark operators are absent due to the structure of the embedding. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Gauge-coupling running and unification (abstract and §4)] The one-loop unification is stated to be satisfied after choosing intermediate scales, but the explicit beta-function coefficients, threshold corrections, and numerical values of the intermediate scales are not displayed. Without these, it is impossible to confirm that the meeting point is a genuine prediction rather than a fit.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the explicit details of the renormalization group running were not sufficiently displayed. In the revised Section 4, we now include the one-loop beta-function coefficients for each gauge group at the different stages of the breaking chain, along with the threshold corrections at the intermediate scales. We also provide a table listing the numerical values of the intermediate scales (M_{G(2)} ≈ 10^{10} GeV and M_{SU(3)_A} ≈ 10^{12} GeV) that lead to unification at approximately 10^{16} GeV. This demonstrates that the unification is achieved consistently with the chosen breaking scales without additional fine-tuning. revision: yes

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Unification and embedding properties reduce to scale fitting and asserted branching rules by construction

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "The scalar potential for the three Higgs sectors has been constructed, deriving the heavy gauge-bosons spectrum and presenting a consistent one-loop running of the gauge couplings across the intermediate scales, which is shown to satisfy E6 unification."

    Intermediate scales are chosen to force the gauge couplings to meet at the E6 unification scale; the unification condition is therefore satisfied by construction via parameter adjustment rather than predicted from the embedding or potential.

  2. self definitional [Abstract]
    "I developed a grand unified framework based on a special (non-regular) embedding of the exceptional group E6 in which the first stage of symmetry breaking chain realizes E6→G(2)×SU(3)A. ... The special embedding naturally suppresses tree-level leptoquark couplings ... Hypercharge is defined from the t8 generator of SU(3)A ... The E6 27 representation neatly packages one SM family, while exotic states are lifted vectorlike and made ultraheavy."

    The embedding is introduced as having exactly the decomposition and suppression properties needed for the SM plus dark sector; the subsequent claims (no proton decay operators, correct spectrum, vectorlike exotics) follow directly from this definition without independent verification of the branching rules.

full rationale

The paper asserts a non-regular E6 embedding with specific decomposition properties (one SM family, no tree-level leptoquarks, correct hypercharge from t8) and then constructs the breaking chain and scalar potential around it. The one-loop running is presented as satisfying E6 unification after selecting intermediate scales, with no independent derivation of the meeting point shown. This matches fitted-input-called-prediction for the unification and self-definitional for the embedding, as the desired outcomes are built into the choice of embedding and scales rather than emerging from first principles. The central claims therefore reduce to the inputs by construction, though the model remains self-contained within its assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The framework rests on the existence of the special embedding, the ability to construct a suitable scalar potential, and the choice of intermediate scales to achieve unification; these are not derived from more fundamental principles within the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • intermediate symmetry breaking scales
    Chosen to produce the desired low-energy spectrum and to make the gauge couplings meet at the E6 scale.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption A special non-regular embedding of E6 into G(2) x SU(3)_A exists and permits the breaking chain E6 to G(2) x SU(3)_A to SU(3)_C x SU(2)_L x U(1)_Y plus dark sector.
    Invoked as the starting point of the entire construction.
invented entities (1)
  • G(2) dark glueballs no independent evidence
    purpose: Secluded dark matter candidates
    Arise from confinement in the hidden G(2) sector; no independent collider signature is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5673 in / 1533 out tokens · 37292 ms · 2026-05-15T10:25:05.107689+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

160 extracted references · 160 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Thomson,Modern particle physics

    M. Thomson,Modern particle physics. Cambridge University Press, 2013

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Bertone,Particle Dark Matter: Observations, Models and Searches

    G. Bertone,Particle Dark Matter: Observations, Models and Searches. Cambridge University Press,

    work page

  3. [3]

    Available: http://qut.eblib.com.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=542829 33

    [Online]. Available: http://qut.eblib.com.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=542829 33

    work page

  4. [4]

    Profumo,An introduction to particle dark matter

    S. Profumo,An introduction to particle dark matter. World Scientific Publishing Europe Ltd, 2017

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Mitsou,Infrared non-local modifications of general relativity

    E. Mitsou,Infrared non-local modifications of general relativity. Springer, 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Eleftherios,Modifications of Einstein’s theory of gravity at large distances

    P. Eleftherios,Modifications of Einstein’s theory of gravity at large distances. Springer, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-10070-8

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10070-8 2015

  7. [7]

    Modified Gravity and Cosmology,

    T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, “Modified Gravity and Cosmology,”Phys. Rept., vol. 513, pp. 1–189, 2012

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Trinification frome 6 symmetry breaking,

    K. Babu, “Trinification frome 6 symmetry breaking,”JHEP, 2023

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    A realistic theory ofe 6 unification through novel intermediate stages,

    K. S. Babu, “A realistic theory ofe 6 unification through novel intermediate stages,”JHEP, 2024

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Special grand unification,

    N. Yamatsu, “Special grand unification,”Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys., vol. 2017, p. 061B01, 2017

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Non-abelian dark sectors and their collider signatures,

    L. Forestell, D. E. Morrissey, and K. Sigurdson, “Non-abelian dark sectors and their collider signatures,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 95, p. 015032, 2017

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Non-Abelian Dark Forces and the Relic Densities of Dark Glueballs,

    ——, “Non-Abelian Dark Forces and the Relic Densities of Dark Glueballs,”Phys. Rev., vol. D95, no. 1, p. 015032, 2017

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Hidden SU(N) Glueball Dark Matter,

    A. Soni and Y . Zhang, “Hidden SU(N) Glueball Dark Matter,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 93, no. 11, p. 115025, 2016

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    The resurgence of the G(2) group for the strong sector and the emergence of dark matter,

    N. Masi, “The resurgence of the G(2) group for the strong sector and the emergence of dark matter,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 1004, p. 116562, 2024

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    An exceptional G(2) extension of the Standard Model from the correspondence with Cayley–Dickson algebras automorphism groups,

    ——, “An exceptional G(2) extension of the Standard Model from the correspondence with Cayley–Dickson algebras automorphism groups,”Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, nov 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41598-021-01814-1

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    SU(n) gauge theories in four dimensions: exploring the approach to n=∞ ,

    B. Lucini and M. Teper, “SU(n) gauge theories in four dimensions: exploring the approach to n=∞ ,” 2001

    work page 2001

  17. [17]

    The glueball spectrum from an anisotropic lattice study,

    C. J. Morningstar and M. Peardon, “The glueball spectrum from an anisotropic lattice study,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 60, p. 034509, 1999

    work page 1999

  18. [18]

    Exceptional confinement in G(2) gauge theory,

    K. Holland, P. Minkowski, M. Pepe, and U.-J. Wiese, “Exceptional confinement in G(2) gauge theory,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 668, pp. 207–236, 2003

    work page 2003

  19. [19]

    Greensite,An Introduction to the Confinement Problem, ser

    J. Greensite,An Introduction to the Confinement Problem, ser. Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer, 2011, vol. 821

    work page 2011

  20. [20]

    G2 gauge theories,

    A. Maas and B. H. Wellegehausen, “G2 gauge theories,”PoS, vol. LATTICE2012, p. 080, 2012

    work page 2012

  21. [21]

    Klein-gordon geon,

    D. J. Kaup, “Klein-gordon geon,”Physical Review, vol. 172, pp. 1331–1342, 1968

    work page 1968

  22. [22]

    Systems of self-gravitating particles in general relativity and the concept of an equation of state,

    R. Ruffini and S. Bonazzola, “Systems of self-gravitating particles in general relativity and the concept of an equation of state,”Physical Review, vol. 187, pp. 1767–1783, 1969

    work page 1969

  23. [23]

    Boson stars: Gravitational equilibria of self-interacting scalar fields,

    M. Colpi, S. L. Shapiro, and I. Wasserman, “Boson stars: Gravitational equilibria of self-interacting scalar fields,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 57, pp. 2485–2488, 1986

    work page 1986

  24. [24]

    Dynamical boson stars,

    S. L. Liebling and C. Palenzuela, “Dynamical boson stars,”Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 15, p. 6, 2012

    work page 2012

  25. [25]

    Maximal subgroups of the classical groups,

    E. B. Dynkin, “Maximal subgroups of the classical groups,”Trudy Moskov. Mat. Obshch., vol. 1, pp. 39–166, 1952, english transl.: Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. (6) (1957) 245–378. 34

    work page 1952

  26. [26]

    Semisimple subalgebras of semisimple lie algebras,

    E. Dynkin, “Semisimple subalgebras of semisimple lie algebras,”Mathematics of the USSR Sbornik, vol. 30, pp. 349–462, 1957

    work page 1957

  27. [27]

    Finite-dimensional lie algebras and their representations for unified model building,

    N. Yamatsu, “Finite-dimensional lie algebras and their representations for unified model building,” arXiv e-prints, 2015

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    Group theory for unified model building,

    R. Slansky, “Group theory for unified model building,”Physics Reports, vol. 79, pp. 1–128, 1981

    work page 1981

  29. [29]

    E 6 as a unifying gauge symmetry,

    Q. Shafi, “E 6 as a unifying gauge symmetry,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 79, pp. 301–304, 1978

    work page 1978

  30. [30]

    A universal gauge theory model based on E6,

    F. G¨ursey, P. Ramond, and P. Sikivie, “A universal gauge theory model based on E6,”Physics Letters B, vol. 60, pp. 177–180, 1976

    work page 1976

  31. [31]

    Quark-lepton symmetry and mass scales in an E6 unified gauge model,

    Y . Achiman and B. Stech, “Quark-lepton symmetry and mass scales in an E6 unified gauge model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 77, pp. 389–393, 1978

    work page 1978

  32. [32]

    ”low-energy phenomenology of superstring inspirede6 models

    J. L. Hewett and T. G. Rizzo, “”low-energy phenomenology of superstring inspirede6 models”,”Physics Reports, vol. 183, pp. 193–381, 1989

    work page 1989

  33. [33]

    Georgi,Lie Algebras in Particle Physics: From Isospin to Unified Theories, 2nd ed

    H. Georgi,Lie Algebras in Particle Physics: From Isospin to Unified Theories, 2nd ed. Westview Press, 1999

    work page 1999

  34. [34]

    Baryon and lepton nonconserving processes,

    S. Weinberg, “Baryon and lepton nonconserving processes,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 43, p. 1566, 1979

    work page 1979

  35. [35]

    Operator analysis of nucleon decay,

    F. Wilczek and A. Zee, “Operator analysis of nucleon decay,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 43, p. 1571, 1979

    work page 1979

  36. [36]

    Search for proton decay via p→e +π0 and p→µ +π0 in 0.31 megaton·years exposure of the super-kamiokande water cherenkov detector,

    K. Abeet al., “Search for proton decay via p→e +π0 and p→µ +π0 in 0.31 megaton·years exposure of the super-kamiokande water cherenkov detector,”Physical Review D, vol. 95, p. 012004, 2017

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    Review of particle physics,

    P. D. Group, R. L. Workmanet al., “Review of particle physics,”Progress of Theoretical and Experi- mental Physics, vol. 2024, p. 083C01, 2024

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems,

    A. H. Guth, “Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems,”Physical Review D, vol. 23, pp. 347–356, 1981

    work page 1981

  39. [39]

    Chaotic inflation,

    A. D. Linde, “Chaotic inflation,”Physics Letters B, vol. 129, pp. 177–181, 1983

    work page 1983

  40. [40]

    A new inflationary universe scenario,

    A. Linde, “A new inflationary universe scenario,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 108, p. 389, 1982

    work page 1982

  41. [41]

    Baryogenesis without grand unification,

    M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, “Baryogenesis without grand unification,”Physics Letters B, vol. 174, pp. 45–47, 1986

    work page 1986

  42. [42]

    Baryogenesis via leptogenesis: Spontaneous b and l violation,

    P. Fileviez P´erez, C. Murgui, and A. D. Plascencia, “Baryogenesis via leptogenesis: Spontaneous b and l violation,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 104, p. 055007, Sep 2021. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.055007

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.055007 2021

  43. [43]

    Leptogenesis in the universe,

    C. S. Fong, E. Nardi, and A. Riotto, “Leptogenesis in the universe,”Adv. High Energy Phys., vol. 2012, p. 158303, 2012

    work page 2012

  44. [44]

    Unity of all elementary-particle forces,

    H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, “Unity of all elementary-particle forces,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 32, pp. 438–441, 1974

    work page 1974

  45. [45]

    Unified interactions of leptons and hadrons,

    H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, “Unified interactions of leptons and hadrons,”Annals of Physics, vol. 93, pp. 193–266, 1975

    work page 1975

  46. [46]

    G. G. Ross,Grand Unified Theories. Westview Press, 1984

    work page 1984

  47. [47]

    R. N. Mohapatra,Unification and Supersymmetry: The Frontiers of Quark-Lepton Physics, 3rd ed. Springer, 2003. 35

    work page 2003

  48. [48]

    Lower limits on proton lifetime from cosmology and supergravity,

    J. Ellis, D. V . Nanopoulos, and K. A. Olive, “Lower limits on proton lifetime from cosmology and supergravity,”Physics Letters B, vol. 112, pp. 459–463, 1982

    work page 1982

  49. [49]

    An E6 gauge field theory model,

    M. Serdaro ˇglu, “An E6 gauge field theory model,”Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 271–277, 1982. [Online]. Available: https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0378437182902953

    work page arXiv 1982

  50. [50]

    Extra gauge bosons in e6,

    D. London and J. L. Rosner, “Extra gauge bosons in e6,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 34, pp. 1530–1546, Sep

    work page

  51. [51]

    Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.34.1530

    [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.34.1530

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.34.1530

  52. [52]

    Grand unified theories,

    S. Raby, “Grand unified theories,”Rept. Prog. Phys., vol. 79, p. 036901, 2006

    work page 2006

  53. [53]

    Unification and supersymmetry,

    R. N. Mohapatra, “Unification and supersymmetry,”Springer, 1986

    work page 1986

  54. [54]

    Grand unified theories,

    P. D. Group, “Grand unified theories,”Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys., 2025

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Fermion masses and coupling unification in E6 : Life in the desert,

    B. Stech and Z. Tavartkiladze, “Fermion masses and coupling unification in E6 : Life in the desert,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 70, p. 035002, Aug 2004. [Online]. Available: https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.035002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.035002 2004

  56. [56]

    Generation symmetry and E6 unification,

    B. e. a. Stech, “Generation symmetry and E6 unification,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 77, p. 076009, Apr 2008. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.076009

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.076009 2008

  57. [57]

    Mass of the Higgs boson in the trinification subgroup of E6,

    B. Stech, “Mass of the Higgs boson in the trinification subgroup of E6,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 86, p. 055003, Sep 2012. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.055003

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.055003 2012

  58. [58]

    Trinification from E6 symmetry breaking,

    K. S. Babu, B. Bajc, and V . Susic, “Trinification from E6 symmetry breaking,”Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2023, no. 7, Jul. 2023. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2023)011

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2023)011 2023

  59. [59]

    Dark matter in E 6 Grand unification,

    J. Schwichtenberg, “Dark matter in E 6 Grand unification,”JHEP, vol. 02, p. 016, 2018

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    The physics of heavy Z’ gauge bosons,

    P. Langacker, “The physics of heavy Z’ gauge bosons,”Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 81, pp. 1199–1228, 2009

    work page 2009

  61. [61]

    Phenomenology of an E6 inspired extension of the Standard Model: Higgs sector,

    S. Bhattacharyya and A. Datta, “Phenomenology of an E6 inspired extension of the Standard Model: Higgs sector,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 105, p. 075021, Apr 2022. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.075021

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.075021 2022

  62. [62]

    Proton stability in grand unified theories, in strings, and in branes,

    P. Nath and P. Fileviez Perez, “Proton stability in grand unified theories, in strings, and in branes,”Phys. Rept., vol. 441, pp. 191–317, 2007

    work page 2007

  63. [63]

    Radiative corrections as the origin of spontaneous symmetry breaking,

    S. Coleman and E. Weinberg, “Radiative corrections as the origin of spontaneous symmetry breaking,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 7, p. 1888, 1973

    work page 1973

  64. [64]

    On the representations of the semisimple lie groups. II. the exceptional groups,

    G. E. Baird and L. C. Biedenharn, “On the representations of the semisimple lie groups. II. the exceptional groups,”Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 5, pp. 1723–1733, 1964

    work page 1964

  65. [65]

    Lieart 2.0 – a mathematica application for lie algebras and representation theory,

    R. Feger, T. W. Kephart, and R. J. Saskowski, “Lieart 2.0 – a mathematica application for lie algebras and representation theory,”Computer Physics Communications, vol. 257, p. 107490, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010465520302290

    work page 2020

  66. [66]

    Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields

    S. Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields. Vol. 2: Modern Applications. Cambridge University Press, 1996

    work page 1996

  67. [67]

    An improved NExT-DMD for efficient automated operational modal analysis.Applied Mathematical Modelling2026,156, 116823

    M. Pepe, “Confinement and the center of the gauge group,”Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 207–214, Mar 2006. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. nuclphysbps.2006.01.045

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2006

  68. [68]

    Exceptional deconfinement in gauge theory,

    M. Pepe and U.-J. Wiese, “Exceptional deconfinement in gauge theory,”Nuclear Physics B, vol. 768, no. 1-2, pp. 21–37, Apr 2007. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.12.024 36

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.12.024 2007

  69. [69]

    Grand unified theories and proton decay,

    P. Langacker, “Grand unified theories and proton decay,”Physics Reports, vol. 72, pp. 185–385, 1981

    work page 1981

  70. [70]

    Infrared singularities and massive fields,

    T. Appelquist and J. Carazzone, “Infrared singularities and massive fields,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 11, pp. 2856–2861, 1975

    work page 1975

  71. [71]

    Phenomenology of exotic particles in e(6) theories,

    R. W. Robinett and J. L. Rosner, “Phenomenology of exotic particles in e(6) theories,”Phys. Rept., vol. 89, pp. 223–322, 1982

    work page 1982

  72. [72]

    Low-energy phenomenology of superstring-inspiredE 6 models,

    J. L. Hewett and T. G. Rizzo, “Low-energy phenomenology of superstring-inspiredE 6 models,”Phys. Rept., vol. 183, pp. 193–381, 1989

    work page 1989

  73. [73]

    R. A. Bertlmann,Anomalies in Quantum Field Theory. Oxford University Press, 1996

    work page 1996

  74. [74]

    E6tensors: A mathematica package for e6 tensors,

    T. Deppisch, “E6tensors: A mathematica package for e6 tensors,”Computer Physics Communications, vol. 213, pp. 130–135, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0010465516302818

    work page 2017

  75. [75]

    Electroweak higgs potentials and vacuum stability,

    M. Sher, “Electroweak higgs potentials and vacuum stability,”Phys. Rept., vol. 179, p. 273, 1989

    work page 1989

  76. [76]

    Investigating the near-criticality of the higgs boson,

    D. e. a. Buttazzo, “Investigating the near-criticality of the higgs boson,”JHEP, vol. 12, p. 089, 2013

    work page 2013

  77. [77]

    The cp-conserving two-higgs-doublet model: The approach to the decoupling limit,

    J. F. Gunion and H. E. Haber, “The cp-conserving two-higgs-doublet model: The approach to the decoupling limit,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 67, p. 075019, 2003

    work page 2003

  78. [78]

    The standard model as an effective field theory,

    I. Brivio and M. Trott, “The standard model as an effective field theory,”Phys. Rept., vol. 793, pp. 1–98, 2019

    work page 2019

  79. [79]

    Phenomenology of higgs triplet model,

    E. J. Chun, K. Kim, and J. Lee, “Phenomenology of higgs triplet model,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 66, p. 073003, 2002

    work page 2002

  80. [80]

    Heavy higgs bosons in the type-ii seesaw model,

    Y . Cai, T. Han, T. Li, and R.-J. Zhang, “Heavy higgs bosons in the type-ii seesaw model,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 96, p. 035027, 2017

    work page 2017

Showing first 80 references.