Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 119 references

Physics-informed neural networks for solving saddle-point equations in strong-field physics with tailored fields

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-15 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read An unsupervised neural network recovers complex ionization times for tailored laser fields by minimizing the residual of the saddle-point equations alone.

desk verdict Clean, well-scoped PINN proof-of-concept for multi-root complex SPE in direct ATI; the window trick works and the benchmarks are solid. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.15786 v2 pith:7FWAHORU submitted 2026-03-16 physics.atom-ph physics.comp-phquant-ph

Jiakang Chen , Sufia Hashim , Carla Figueira de Morisson Faria This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phphysics.comp-phquant-ph
keywords physics-informedneuralnetworkssaddle-pointequationsstrong-fieldapproximationabove-thresholdionizationtailoredlaserfieldscomplextimesphotoelectronmomentumdistributions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Strong-field ionization calculations often stall on the saddle-point equations that locate the complex times when an electron tunnels out of an atom. For monochromatic light the roots are easy to track, but for few-cycle, bichromatic or elliptically polarized pulses the same equations become multi-valued and conventional Newton solvers need repeated hand-crafted guesses. This paper shows that a physics-informed neural network, trained only on the residual of those equations and equipped with a simple window that confines each output to a chosen region of the complex-time plane, can recover the dominant ionization times across wide ranges of intensity, carrier-envelope phase, ellipticity and relative phase. Once trained, the network yields coherent photoelectron spectra whose symmetries match those of the driving field, without ever seeing a labeled solution. The result is a practical, unsupervised route to the semiclassical trajectories that underlie above-threshold ionization, and a foundation for treating the harder, multi-root problems that appear when Coulomb corrections or rescattering are included.

What carries the argument

Window parametrization: the network outputs an unconstrained latent variable that is smoothly squashed into a user-chosen rectangular region of the complex-time plane, thereby selecting one physical root manifold per training run and preventing mode collapse onto a single dominant basin.

What would settle it

Train the same windowed PINN on a known bichromatic or few-cycle field for which an independent high-accuracy Newton solver has already catalogued all dominant roots; if the network systematically misses a symmetry-allowed root, jumps between roots across intensity, or produces photoelectron spectra whose interference fringes disagree with the reference calculation, the claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

An unsupervised physics-informed neural network that minimizes only the residual of the direct-ATI saddle-point equation, combined with a window parametrization that maps unconstrained network outputs into prescribed regions of the complex-time plane, robustly recovers the dominant complex ionization times for monochromatic, few-cycle, bichromatic, elliptical and bicircular fields over wide ranges of intensity, CEP, ellipticity and relative phase, and produces coherent photoelectron momentum distributions that correctly reflect the symmetries of the driving fields.

Load-bearing premise

That a few coarse, symmetry-guided windows are enough to isolate every physically relevant ionization root without missing weaker events or admitting unphysical ones, and that residual minimization inside those windows alone selects the correct physical branch.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces an unsupervised physics-informed neural network (PINN) that solves the direct-ATI saddle-point equation within the strong-field approximation by minimizing the SPE residual alone. A window parametrization maps unconstrained network outputs into prescribed regions of the complex-time plane, thereby selecting individual root manifolds. The method is benchmarked against a conventional Newton-type solver for monochromatic, few-cycle, bichromatic, elliptical and bicircular fields over ranges of intensity, CEP, ellipticity and relative phase. The recovered complex ionization times are used to construct coherent photoelectron momentum distributions that correctly inherit the dynamical symmetries of the driving fields. The work is presented as a controlled proof-of-concept for direct ATI, with extensions to rescattered ATI and Coulomb-corrected models left as outlook.

Significance. If the reported performance holds, the paper supplies a practical, data-free alternative to heuristic-initialized Newton solvers for the simplest and best-understood SPE in strong-field physics. Direct residual minimization, an ablation that quantifies the necessity of windowing (Table II), residual MSE maps on both 1-D cuts and full 2-D momentum grids, and side-by-side comparison with an independent classical root finder across five field families constitute a solid empirical foundation. The ability of a single trained model to track intensity and continuous field parameters without retraining is operationally useful for large parameter scans. The work is carefully scoped and does not over-claim for more nonlinear processes; it therefore provides a credible first step toward machine-learning SPE solvers in attosecond science.

major comments (2)
  1. Sec. IV B and the ablation in Table II establish that windowing is essential for root control, yet the manuscript does not quantify how sensitive the recovered roots are to the precise choice of window centers tc and scales s. A short systematic scan (or a statement of the admissible range of tc,s that still recovers the same physical branch) is needed to show that the coarse, symmetry-guided priors are robust rather than finely tuned for each field family.
  2. The claim that the network 'tracks changes in ionization event dominance' (abstract and Sec. V A 2) is demonstrated for three CEPs of a few-cycle pulse, but the paper does not report a quantitative criterion (e.g., relative |Im t| or residual magnitude) by which a window is judged dominant versus sub-dominant. Without such a metric it remains unclear how an end-user would decide how many windows to open when the field is less familiar than the cases shown.
minor comments (4)
  1. Table IV is referenced in the text as 'Table V A 3' in several places; the numbering should be made consistent.
  2. Fig. 3 caption and surrounding text refer to a 'four-fold bicircular field' while the figure itself is not fully self-explanatory for a reader who has not yet reached Sec. V B; a brief reminder of the field parameters would help.
  3. The ionization potential Ip = 0.904 a.u. for He is stated once; it would be useful to note explicitly that the residual (Eq. 19) is independent of any adjustable target-specific prefactor, so that the reported accuracy is not target-dependent.
  4. A few typographical inconsistencies appear (e.g., 'adominant' missing space, occasional double spaces, and the arXiv identifier in the header). A light copy-edit pass would remove them.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: unsupervised residual minimization of the SPE, with independent Newton-solver validation and no fitted constants entering the physics loss.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The network is trained solely by minimizing the physics residual L_physics = |(p + A(t_pred, γ))² + 2 I_p|² (Eqs. 15–19) with L_data = 0; no labeled saddle times or observables enter training. Window centers/scales are coarse, symmetry-guided priors (near π/ω or π/(2ω)) that restrict the output domain, not definitions of the roots themselves; residual minimization inside each window still has to locate the actual complex root, and ablation (Table II) plus MSE maps confirm this is not forced. All reported ionization times and PMDs are compared side-by-side against an independent classical Newton-type root finder never seen during training. Self-citations are to prior SFA/symmetry literature of the group and others; none supply a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that is load-bearing for the PINN residual or the recovery claim. Extensions to rescattered ATI or Coulomb-corrected models are explicitly aspirational and do not underwrite the strongest claim. Consequently the central result does not reduce by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard SFA saddle-point equation, the unsupervised residual loss, and the ad-hoc window map that selects roots. Hyper-parameters are chosen by ablation on the monochromatic case and then frozen. No new physical entities are postulated; the only free choices are network capacity, window centers/scales, and training schedule.

free parameters (4)
  • network depth L and width W = L=3, W=128
    Selected by ablation (Table II) on the monochromatic field; final choice L=3, W=128 is frozen for all other fields.
  • window centers tc and scales s = field-dependent, e.g. near half-cycle extrema
    Hand-chosen near classical extrema (π/ω, π/(2ω), …) guided by field symmetries; not learned.
  • learning rate and batch size = lr ~10^{-3}–10^{-4}, batch 256
    Ablated; final values affect convergence speed but not the physics residual definition.
  • ionization potential Ip = 0.904 a.u.
    Fixed atomic constant for helium 1s; enters the SPE residual as a constant.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The direct-ATI saddle-point equation [p+A(t)]^{2}/2 + Ip = 0 completely determines the physically relevant complex ionization times within the SFA.
    Standard SFA literature; invoked throughout Sec. II and as the sole physics residual (Eq. 15).
  • domain assumption Neglect of the continuum-continuum prefactor and of the residual Coulomb potential does not alter the locations of the dominant saddles for the purpose of this benchmark.
    Stated explicitly in Sec. II to isolate field-symmetry effects.
  • ad hoc to paper A smooth squashing map (tanh) of unconstrained network outputs into a fixed rectangular window of the complex plane isolates a unique physical root manifold.
    Introduced in Sec. IV B; essential to prevent mode collapse; no general theorem guarantees uniqueness for arbitrary fields.
  • domain assumption Coarse priors for window centers taken from the simple-man model (real ionization times near field extrema) remain valid across the intensity and CEP ranges studied.
    Used to set tc without iterative refinement; justified by known SFA behavior for direct ATI.
invented entities (1)
  • window parametrization of complex-time outputs
    purpose: Force the multi-valued SPE map to a single root per network instance, thereby curing mode collapse of the unsupervised residual loss.
    The map t_pred = tc + s ⊙ tanh(t̃) is introduced ad hoc in Sec. IV B; its success is demonstrated empirically but not derived from a uniqueness theorem.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Physics-informed neural networks for solving saddle-point equations in strong-field physics with tailored fields." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7FWAHORU

@misc{pith2026260315786,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Physics-informed neural networks for solving saddle-point equations in strong-field physics with tailored fields},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7FWAHORU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.15786}
}
read the original abstract

We develop an unsupervised physics-informed neural network to solve saddle-point equations (SPEs) governing direct above-threshold ionization (ATI) within the strong-field approximation. This setting provides a well-understood testbed in which the saddle-point structure is known for tailored driving fields, enabling systematic validation of the proposed solver. The network is trained by minimizing the residual of the SPEs and requires only the definition of the driving-field shape and its parameters, such as intensity, carrier-envelope phase, ellipticity, and relative phase. We introduce a window parametrization strategy that maps network outputs to prescribed regions of the complex-time plane, guiding the optimization toward physically relevant solutions and improving convergence stability. We benchmark the PINN against a conventional solver for a range of fields, demonstrating robust recovery of the dominant complex ionization times over wide parameter ranges. The network tracks changes in ionization event dominance as laser parameters are varied, enabling exploration of regimes where conventional solvers require repeated manual initialization. Using the PINN-derived solutions, we compute coherent ATI photoelectron momentum distributions and show the symmetries of the driving fields are reflected in both the saddle-point structure and the resulting spectra. These results establish PINNs as a promising framework for semiclassical strong-field calculations and provide a foundation for extending machine-learning solvers to Coulomb-corrected models or to more complex processes, such as rescattered ATI for which the SPEs are highly nonlinear and the presence of multiple closely-spaced solutions makes conventional Newton-type root-finding highly sensitive to initial guesses, which hinders systematic investigations across laser-parameter spaces, particularly for tailored fields.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Thetime-translationoperator ˆTT (τT ) is defined as ˆTT (τT ) :t→t+τ T ,(5) which shifts the electric field waveform along the time axis,E(t)→E(t+τ T ). If the driving field is invariant under ˆTT (τ), the equations of motion are unchanged by this transformation, and solutions occur in symmetry-related ‘families’ separated by the time shiftτ

  2. [2]

    Time- reflection symmetry relates ionization and recolli- sion events occurring before and after the reference time

    Thetime-reflectionoperator ˆTR(τR) is defined as ˆTR(τR) :t→ −t+τ R,(6) which reflects the electric field waveform about a reference timeτ R,E(t)→E(−t+τ R). Time- reflection symmetry relates ionization and recolli- sion events occurring before and after the reference time

  3. [3]

    In the dipole approximation and for inversion-symmetric targets, this operator corresponds to a reflection about the time-axis

    For linearly polarized fields, thefield-inversion operator ˆFis defined as ˆF:E(t)→ −E(t), A(t)→ −A(t) (7) which is an inversion of the electric field (or vector potential) along the polarization axis. In the dipole approximation and for inversion-symmetric targets, this operator corresponds to a reflection about the time-axis. It is dynamically equivalen...

  4. [4]

    Note that while ˆRθ is a generic rotation operator, ro- tational symmetry only exists for specific angles θ=θ n

    For nonlinearly polarized fields, the discrete rota- tion operator ˆRn plays a role, and is defined as, ˆRn :E(t)→ R θnE(t),(8) whereR θn denotes a rotation by an angleθ n. Note that while ˆRθ is a generic rotation operator, ro- tational symmetry only exists for specific angles θ=θ n. For linearly polarized fields, rotating by any angle changes the field....

  5. [5]

    These fields take the form, E(t) =E 0 sin(ωt)ˆ ex.(9) whereE 0 is the field amplitude,ωis the frequency andˆ ex denotes the polarization direction

    Monochromatic fields Linearly polarized monochromatic fields provide a use- ful reference point for the upcoming discussion. These fields take the form, E(t) =E 0 sin(ωt)ˆ ex.(9) whereE 0 is the field amplitude,ωis the frequency andˆ ex denotes the polarization direction. Owing to their strict periodicity and simple temporal structure, these fields exhibi...

  6. [6]

    Symmetries can be pre- served or broken by tuningϕand changing the temporal structure of the field

    Bichromatic fields Linearly polarized bichromatic fields take the form, E(t) = [E1 cos(rωt) +E 2 cos(sωt+ϕ)]ˆ ex,(10) whererandsdenote the harmonic order of the first and second colors respectively andϕis the relative phase between the two components. Symmetries can be pre- served or broken by tuningϕand changing the temporal structure of the field. This ...

  7. [7]

    Here, we use the convention in [30], which setsϕ=ϕ 1 −ϕ 0, withϕ 0 = 60 ◦

    Few-cycle pulse Few-cycle pulses can take the form, E(t) =E 0 sin2 ωt 2N sin(ωt+ϕ)]ˆ ex =E 0 sin(ωt+ϕ)− 1 2[sin(ωt(1 + 1 N ) +ϕ) + sin(ωt(1− 1 N ) +ϕ) ˆ ex (11) whereNis the number of optical cycles andϕis the carrier envelope phase. Here, we use the convention in [30], which setsϕ=ϕ 1 −ϕ 0, withϕ 0 = 60 ◦. The few- cycle pulse can be decomposed into a li...

  8. [8]

    Monochromatic field Figs. 5(a),(a’) and (b),(b’) show the real and imaginary parts of the ionization time as functions of the paral- lel electron momentum, respectively, predicted using the PINN solver detailed in Sec. IV for two half-cycles (and correspondingly, two windows) of the monochromatic field. The PINN predictions are in good agreement with the ...

Show all 119 references
  1. [9]

    Con- sequently, these saddle point solutions and distributions are mainly affected by the events taken into account

    Few-cycle pulse with CEP The few-cycle pulse breaks all of the three dynami- cal symmetries present for monochromatic fields. Con- sequently, these saddle point solutions and distributions are mainly affected by the events taken into account. Fig. 6 exhibits the imaginary ioni...

  2. [10]

    7(a)-(d) shows the imaginary part of the ioniza- tion time computed with the PINN solver for the bichro- matic fields shown in Fig

    Bichromatic fields Figs. 7(a)-(d) shows the imaginary part of the ioniza- tion time computed with the PINN solver for the bichro- matic fields shown in Fig. 1(c)-(c ′′′). For each field, mul- tiple windows corresponding to each distinct solution [31] are taken, denoted by the ...

  3. [11]

    We use atomic units throughout this work, such that ℏ= 1

  4. [12]

    Rosenfelder, Path integrals in quantum physics (2017), arXiv:1209.1315 [nucl-th]

    R. Rosenfelder, Path integrals in quantum physics (2017), arXiv:1209.1315 [nucl-th]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [13]

    S. S. Seahra, Path integrals in quantum field theory (2000)

    2000

  6. [14]

    Misumi and C

    T. Misumi and C. Pazarba¸ sı, Exact WKB in all sectors. part i. potentials with degenerate saddles, J. High Energy Phys.2025(4)

    2025

  7. [15]

    Andreassen, D

    A. Andreassen, D. Farhi, W. Frost, and M. D. Schwartz, Direct approach to quantum tunneling, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 231601 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    Elder, K

    B. Elder, K. Gawrych, and A. Rajantie, Constrained instantons in scalar field theories (2025), arXiv:2510.21922 [hep-th]

    2025

  9. [17]

    Altland and B

    A. Altland and B. D. Simons,Condensed Matter Field Theory, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  10. [18]

    P. B. Corkum, Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 1994 (1993)

    1994

  11. [19]

    Sali` eres, B

    P. Sali` eres, B. Carr´ e, L. Le D´ eroff, F. Grasbon, G. G. Paulus, H. Walther, R. Kopold, W. Becker, D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, A. Sanpera, and M. Lewenstein, Feynman’s path-integral approach for intense-laser-atom interactions, Science292, 902 (2001), http://science.sciencemag.or...

    2001

  12. [20]

    Smirnova, A

    O. Smirnova, A. S. Mouritzen, S. Patchkovskii, and M. Y. Ivanov, Coulomb–laser coupling in laser-assisted photoionization and molecular tomography, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics40, F197 (2007)

    2007

  13. [21]

    Torlina, M

    L. Torlina, M. Ivanov, Z. B. Walters, and O. Smirnova, Time-dependent analytical R-matrix approach for strong-field dynamics. II. Many-electron systems, Phys. Rev. A - At. Mol. Opt. Phys.86, 043409 (2012)

    2012

  14. [22]

    Morishita, A

    T. Morishita, A. T. Le, Z. Chen, and C. D. Lin, Accurate retrieval of structural information from laser-induced photoelectron and high-order harmonic spectra by few-cycle laser pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 013903 (2008), arXiv:0707.3157

    2008 arXiv

  15. [23]

    C. D. Lin, A. T. Le, C. Jin, and H. Wei, Elements of the quantitative rescattering theory, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys.51, 104001 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    D. G. Arb´ o, J. E. Miraglia, M. S. Gravielle, K. Schiessl, E. Persson, and J. Burgd¨ orfer, Coulomb-volkov approximation for near-threshold ionization by short laser pulses, Phys. Rev. A77, 013401 (2008)

    2008

  17. [25]

    Cavaliere, G

    P. Cavaliere, G. Ferrante, and C. Leone, Particle-atom ionising collisions in the presence of a laser radiation field, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys.13, 4495 (1980)

    1980

  18. [26]

    J. W. Geng, L. Qin, M. Li, W. H. Xiong, Y. Liu, Q. Gong, and L. Y. Peng, Nonadiabatic tunneling ionization of atoms in elliptically polarized laser fields, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys.47, 204027 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    X. Y. Lai, C. Poli, H. Schomerus, and C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, Influence of the Coulomb potential on above-threshold ionisation: a quantum-orbit analysis beyond the strong-field approximation, 18 arXiv:1506.03646 , 16 (2015), arXiv:1506.0364

    2015 arXiv

  20. [28]

    A. S. Maxwell, A. Al-Jawahiry, T. Das, and C. F. d. M. Faria, Coulomb-corrected quantum interference in above-threshold ionization: Working towards multi-trajectory electron holography, Phys. Rev. A96, 023420 (2017), arXiv:1705.01518

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    N. I. Shvetsov-Shilovski, M. Lein, L. B. Madsen, E. R¨ as¨ anen, C. Lemell, J. Burgd¨ orfer, D. G. Arb´ o, and K. T˝ ok´ esi, Semiclassical two-step model for strong-field ionization, Phys. Rev. A94, 013415 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    L. B. Fu, G. G. Xin, D. F. Ye, and J. Liu, Recollision dynamics and phase diagram for nonsequential double ionisation with circularly polarized laser fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 103601 (2012)

    2012

  23. [31]

    Huang, M

    C. Huang, M. Zhong, and Z. Wu, Anomalous ellipticity dependence in nonsequential double ionisation of arxe, Scientific Reports8, 10.1038/s41598-018-27120-x (2018)

    2018 doi

  24. [32]

    W. Quan, Z. Lin, M. Wu, H. Kang, H. Liu, X. Liu, J. Chen, J. Liu, X. T. He, S. G. Chen, H. Xiong, L. Guo, H. Xu, Y. Fu, Y. Cheng, and Z. Z. Xu, Classical aspects in above-threshold ionization with a midinfrared strong laser field, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 093001 (2009)

    2009

  25. [33]

    Zhang, X

    L. Zhang, X. Xie, S. Roither, D. Kartashov, Y. Wang, C. Wang, M. Sch¨ offler, D. Shafir, P. B. Corkum, A. Baltuˇ ska, I. Ivanov, A. Kheifets, X. Liu, A. Staudte, and M. Kitzler, Laser-sub-cycle two-dimensional electron-momentum mapping using orthogonal two-color fields, Phys. ...

    2014

  26. [34]

    C. A. Mancuso, D. D. Hickstein, K. M. Dorney, J. L. Ellis, E. Hasovi´ c, R. Knut, P. Grychtol, C. Gentry, M. Gopalakrishnan, D. Zusin, F. J. Dollar, X.-M. Tong, D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, W. Becker, H. C. Kapteyn, and M. M. Murnane, Controlling electron-ion rescattering in two-color...

    2016

  27. [35]

    Q. Song, H. Li, J. Wang, P. Lu, X. Gong, Q. Ji, K. Lin, W. Zhang, J. Ma, H. Li, H. Zeng, F. He, and J. Wu, Double ionisation of nitrogen molecules in orthogonal two-color femtosecond laser fields, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 51, 074002 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    H. Pang, X. Huang, and C. Huang, Sub-cycle dynamics of nonsequential double ionisation of ar atom by few-cycle counter-rotating two-color circularly polarized laser fields, International Journal of Modern Physics B34, 2050304 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Z. Ge, L. Bai, X. Su, and K. Liu, Nonsequential double ionisation channels control of co2 molecules with counter-rotating two-color circularly polarized laser field by laser wavelength, Open Physics21, 20230114 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Z. Liu, C. Huang, T. He, J. Liao, Y. Li, and B. Yu, The coulomb effect in nonsequential double ionisation by counter-rotating two-color elliptical polarization fields, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics26, 4572 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    A. Chen, M. K¨ ubel, B. Bergues, M. F. Kling, and A. Emmanouilidou, Non-sequential double ionisation with near-single cycle laser pulses, Scientific Reports7, 7488 (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    Hashim, R

    S. Hashim, R. Tenney, and C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, Detangling the quantum tapestry of intrachannel interference in below-threshold nonsequential double ionisation with few-cycle laser pulses, Phys. Rev. A109, 063110 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Hashim, D

    S. Hashim, D. Habibovi´ c, and C. F. d. M. Faria, Below-threshold nonsequential double ionisation with linearly polarized two-color fields. i. symmetry and dominance, Phys. Rev. A112, 023118 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Hashim, D

    S. Hashim, D. Habibovi´ c, and C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, Below threshold nonsequential double ionisation with linearly polarized two-color fields II: Quantum interference, arXiv:2504.04971

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Hashim, D

    S. Hashim, D. Habibovi´ c, and C. F. d. M. Faria, Below-threshold nonsequential double ionisation with linearly polarized two-color fields. ii. quantum interference, Phys. Rev. A112, 023119 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    C. F. de Morisson Faria and A. S. Maxwell, It is all about phases: ultrafast holographic photoelectron imaging, Reports on Progress in Physics83, 034401 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Amini, J

    K. Amini, J. Biegert, F. Calegari, A. Chac´ on, M. F. Ciappina, A. Dauphin, D. K. Efimov, C. F. de Morisson Faria, K. Giergiel, P. Gniewek, A. S. Landsman, M. Lesiuk, M. Mandrysz, A. S. Maxwell, R. Moszy´ nski, L. Ortmann, J. A. P´ erez-Hern´ andez, A. Pic´ on, E. Pisanty, J. ...

    2019

  38. [46]

    Keldysh, Ionization in the field of a strong electromagnetic wave, Sov

    L. Keldysh, Ionization in the field of a strong electromagnetic wave, Sov. Phys. JETP20, 1307 (1965)

    1965

  39. [47]

    F. H. M. Faisal, Multiple absorption of laser photons by atoms, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics6, L89 (1973)

    1973

  40. [48]

    H. R. Reiss, Effect of an intense electromagnetic field on a weakly bound system, Phys. Rev. A22, 1786 (1980)

    1980

  41. [49]

    Liu and L

    C. Liu and L. Luo, Quasi-newton methods for saddle point problems, inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 35, edited by S. Koyejo, S. Mohamed, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, K. Cho, and A. Oh (Curran Associates, Inc., 2022) pp. 3975–3987

    2022

  42. [50]

    Nataf and P.-H

    F. Nataf and P.-H. Tournier, A GenEO domain decomposition method for saddle point problems, Comptes Rendus M´ ecanique351, 667 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    V. P. Il’in and G. Y. Kazantcev, Iterative solution of saddle-point systems of linear equations, J. Math. Sci. 249, 199 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    Weber, J

    A. Weber, J. Feldbrugge, and E. Pisanty, A universal approach to saddle-point methods in attosecond science, (2025), arXiv:2510.12545 [quant-ph]

    2025

  45. [53]

    Nocedal and S

    J. Nocedal and S. Wright,Numerical Optimization, 2nd ed., Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering (Springer, New York, NY, 2006)

    2006

  46. [54]

    Murray, Newton-type methods, inWiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science(Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011)

    W. Murray, Newton-type methods, inWiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science(Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011)

    2011

  47. [55]

    Figueira de Morisson Faria, H

    C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, H. Schomerus, and W. Becker, High-order above-threshold ionization: The uniform approximation and the effect of the binding potential, Phys. Rev. A66, 043413 (2002)

    2002

  48. [56]

    Habibovi´ c, W

    D. Habibovi´ c, W. Becker, and D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, Symmetries and selection rules of the spectra of photoelectrons and high-order harmonics generated by 19 field-driven atoms and molecules, Symmetry14, 1566 (2021)

    2021

  49. [57]

    M. V. Berry, Uniform Asymptotic Smoothing of Stokes’s Discontinuities, Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.422, 7 (1989)

    1989

  50. [58]

    Koch and D

    W. Koch and D. J. Tannor, Multivalued classical mechanics arising from singularity loops in complex time, The Journal of Chemical Physics148, 084108 (2018)

    2018

  51. [59]

    Koch and D

    W. Koch and D. J. Tannor, Communication: Systematic elimination of stokes divergences emanating from complex phase space caustics, The Journal of Chemical Physics148, 101102 (2018)

    2018

  52. [60]

    Shaaran, C

    T. Shaaran, C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, and H. Schomerus, Causality and quantum interference in time-delayed laser-induced nonsequential double ionisation, Phys. Rev. A85, 023423 (2012)

    2012

  53. [61]

    S. V. Popruzhenko, Invariant form of Coulomb corrections in the theory of nonlinear ionization of atoms by intense laser radiation, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 118, 580 (2014)

    2014

  54. [62]

    A. S. Maxwell, S. V. Popruzhenko, and C. F. d. M. Faria, Treating branch cuts in quantum trajectory models for photoelectron holography, Phys. Rev. A98, 063423 (2018)

    2018

  55. [63]

    T.-M. Yan, S. V. Popruzhenko, M. J. J. Vrakking, and D. Bauer, Low-energy structures in strong field ionization revealed by quantum orbits, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 253002 (2010)

    2010

  56. [64]

    Yan and D

    T.-M. Yan and D. Bauer, Sub-barrier Coulomb effects on the interference pattern in tunneling-ionization photoelectron spectra, Phys. Rev. A86, 053403 (2012)

    2012

  57. [65]

    Cruz Rodriguez, T

    L. Cruz Rodriguez, T. Rook, B. B. Augstein, A. S. Maxwell, and C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, Forward and hybrid path-integral methods in photoelectron holography: Sub-barrier corrections, initial sampling, and momentum mapping, Phys. Rev. A108, 033114 (2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    Q. Z. Xia, J. F. Tao, J. Cai, L. B. Fu, and J. Liu, Quantum interference of glory rescattering in strong-field atomic ionization, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 143201 (2018)

    2018

  59. [67]

    S. D. L´ opez and D. G. Arb´ o, Holographic interference in atomic photoionization from a semiclassical standpoint, Phys. Rev. A100, 023419 (2019)

    2019

  60. [68]

    L. G. Liao, Q. Z. Xia, J. Cai, and J. Liu, Semiclassical trajectory perspective of glory rescattering in strong-field photoelectron holography, Phys. Rev. A 105, 053115 (2022)

    2022

  61. [69]

    T. Rook, D. Habibovi´ c, L. C. Rodriguez, D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, and C. F. d. M. Faria, Impact of the continuum coulomb interaction in quantum-orbit-based treatments of high-order above-threshold ionization, Phys. Rev. A109, 033115 (2024)

    2024

  62. [70]

    A. S. Maxwell and C. F. d. M. Faria, Controlling below-threshold nonsequential double ionization via quantum interference, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 143001 (2016)

    2016

  63. [71]

    Rivera-Dean, P

    J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, C. F. d. M. Faria, and M. Lewenstein, Microscopic analysis of above-threshold ionisation driven by squeezed light, Phys. Rev. A112(2025)

    2025

  64. [72]

    Stammer, J

    P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, A. S. Maxwell, T. Lamprou, J. Arg¨ uello-Luengo, P. Tzallas, M. F. Ciappina, and M. Lewenstein, Entanglement and squeezing of the optical field modes in high harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 143603 (2024)

    2024

  65. [73]

    Z. Lyu, F. Sun, Y. Fang, Q. He, and Y. Liu, Effect of photon quantum statistics on electrons in above-threshold ionization, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L012072 (2025)

    2025

  66. [74]

    H. Liu, H. Zhang, X. Wang, and J. Yuan, Atomic double ionization with quantum light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 123202 (2025)

    2025

  67. [75]

    Habibovi´ c and D

    D. Habibovi´ c and D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, Intensity-dependent enhancements in strong-field ionization by quantum light, Phys. Rev. A112(2025)

    2025

  68. [76]

    Habibovi´ c, W

    D. Habibovi´ c, W. Becker, and D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, Complete classification and additional saddle-point solutions for high-order above-threshold ionisation induced by a strong laser field. ii. classical considerations, Phys. Rev. A111, 053110 (2025)

    2025

  69. [77]

    Habibovi´ c and D

    D. Habibovi´ c and D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, Complete classification and additional saddle-point solutions for high-order above-threshold ionization induced by a strong laser field. III. two-component fields, Phys. Rev. A112(2025)

    2025

  70. [78]

    Caron, P

    C. Caron, P. Lauret, and A. Bastide, Machine learning to speed up computational fluid dynamics engineering simulations for built environments: A review, Build. Environ.267, 112229 (2025)

    2025

  71. [79]

    M. S. I. Sagar, H. Ouassal, A. I. Omi, A. Wisniewska, H. M. Jalajamony, R. E. Fernandez, and P. K. Sekhar, Application of machine learning in electromagnetics: Mini-review, Electronics (Basel)10, 2752 (2021)

    2021

  72. [80]

    Cho and D

    G. Cho and D. Kim, Machine learning on quantum experimental data toward solving quantum many-body problems, Nat. Commun.15, 7552 (2024)

    2024

  73. [81]

    Hajivassiliou, M

    G. Hajivassiliou, M. Kassapis, and J. W. G. Tisch, Rapid retrieval of femtosecond and attosecond pulses from streaking traces using convolutional neural networks, New J. Phys.25, 093024 (2023)

    2023

  74. [82]

    Hirschman, B

    J. Hirschman, B. Mencer, A. Shackelford, R. Obaid, and R. Coffee, A hybrid neural architecture: Online attosecond x-ray characterization, APL Mach. Learn. 3(2025)

    2025

  75. [83]

    Chomet, S

    H. Chomet, S. Plesnik, D. C. Nicolae, J. Dunham, L. Gover, T. Weaving, and C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, Controlling quantum effects in enhanced strong-field ionisation with machine-learning techniques, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys.55, 245501 (2022)

    2022

  76. [84]

    X. Liu, G. Zhang, J. Li, G. Shi, M. Zhou, B. Huang, Y. Tang, X. Song, and W. Yang, Deep learning for feynman’s path integral in strong-field time-dependent dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 113202 (2020)

    2020

  77. [85]

    L. Meng, S. Liang, L. He, J. Hu, S. Sun, P. Lan, and P. Lu, Deep learning for isolated attosecond pulse reconstruction with the all-optical method, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B40, 2536 (2023)

    2023

  78. [86]

    N. I. Shvetsov-Shilovski and M. Lein, Convolutional neural network for retrieval of the time-dependent bond length in a molecule from photoelectron momentum distributions, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys.57, 06LT01 (2024)

    2024

  79. [87]

    K. K. Alaa El-Din, O. G. Alexander, L. J. Frasinski, F. Mintert, Z. Guo, J. Duris, Z. Zhang, D. B. Cesar, P. Franz, T. Driver, P. Walter, J. P. Cryan, 20 A. Marinelli, J. P. Marangos, and R. Mukherjee, Efficient prediction of attosecond two-colour pulses from an x-ray free-ele...

    2024

  80. [88]

    Raissi, P

    M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys.378, 686 (2019)

    2019

  81. [89]

    J. H. Eberly, J. Javanainen, and K. Rza˙ zewski, Above-threshold ionization, Phys. Rep.204, 331 (1991)

    1991

  82. [90]

    Ehlotzky, Atomic phenomena in bichromatic laser fields, Physics Reports345, 175 (2001)

    F. Ehlotzky, Atomic phenomena in bichromatic laser fields, Physics Reports345, 175 (2001)

    2001

  83. [91]

    D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, G. G. Paulus, D. Bauer, and W. Becker, Above-threshold ionization by few-cycle pulses, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics39, R203 (2006)

    2006

  84. [92]

    Bashkansky, P

    M. Bashkansky, P. H. Bucksbaum, and D. W. Schumacher, Above-threshold ionization with elliptically polarized light, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 274 (1987)

    1987

  85. [93]

    Becker and D

    W. Becker and D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, Above-threshold ionization in a bicircular field: quantum orbits unfolding in a plane, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.826, 012008 (2017)

    2017

  86. [94]

    Busuladˇ zi´ c, A

    M. Busuladˇ zi´ c, A. Gazibegovi´ c-Busuladˇ zi´ c, and D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, Strong-field ionization of homonuclear diatomic molecules by a bicircular laser field: Rotational and reflection symmetries, Phys. Rev. A 95, 033411 (2017)

    2017

  87. [95]

    S. Yue, S. Brennecke, H. Du, and M. Lein, Probing dynamical symmetries by bicircular high-order harmonic spectroscopy beyond the born-oppenheimer approximation, Phys. Rev. A101, 053438 (2020)

    2020

  88. [96]

    Neufeld, D

    O. Neufeld, D. Podolsky, and O. Cohen, Floquet group theory and its application to selection rules in harmonic generation, Nature Communications10, 405 (2019)

    2019

  89. [97]

    O. E. Alon, V. Averbukh, and N. Moiseyev, Selection rules for the high harmonic generation spectra, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 3743 (1998)

    1998

  90. [98]

    D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, Circularly polarized high harmonics generated by a bicircular field from inert atomic gases in thepstate: A tool for exploring chirality-sensitive processes, Phys. Rev. A92, 043827 (2015)

    2015

  91. [99]

    M.-M. Liu, M. Li, C. Wu, Q. Gong, A. Staudte, and Y. Liu, Phase structure of strong-field tunneling wave packets from molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 163004 (2016)

    2016

  92. [100]

    D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c and W. Becker, Improved strong-field approximation and quantum-orbit theory: Application to ionisation by a bicircular laser field, Phys. Rev. A 93, 063418 (2016)

    2016

  93. [101]

    Habibovi´ c, A

    D. Habibovi´ c, A. Gazibegovi´ c-Busuladˇ zi´ c, M. Busuladˇ zi´ c, A.ˇCerki´ c, and D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, Strong-field ionisation of homonuclear diatomic molecules using orthogonally polarized two-color laser fields, Phys. Rev. A102, 023111 (2020)

    2020

  94. [102]

    Habibovi´ c, K

    D. Habibovi´ c, K. R. Hamilton, O. Neufeld, and L. Rego, Emerging tailored light sources for studying chirality and symmetry, Nature Reviews Physics6, 663 (2024)

    2024

  95. [103]

    Neufeld, M

    O. Neufeld, M. E. Tzur, O. Kfir, A. Fleischer, and O. Cohen, Light’s symmetry, asymmetry, and their role in nonlinear optics and ultrafast phenomena, https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.19433 (2025), arXiv:2503.19433 [physics.optics]

    2025 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Becker, F

    W. Becker, F. Grasbon, R. Kopold, D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, G. G. Paulus, and H. Walther, Above-threshold ionization: From classical features to quantum effects, Advances in Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics 48, 35 (2002)

    2002

  97. [105]

    Rook and C

    T. Rook and C. F. de Morisson Faria, Exploring symmetries in photoelectron holography with two-color linearly polarized fields, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics55, 165601 (2022)

    2022

  98. [106]

    Victa Trevisan, P

    T. Victa Trevisan, P. Villar Arribi, O. Heinonen, R.-J. Slager, and P. Orth, Controlling symmetry and topology via bicircular light: application to Cd 3As2, in APS March Meeting Abstracts, APS Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 2021 (2021) p. A45.010

    2021

  99. [107]

    D. M. Reich and L. B. Madsen, Illuminating molecular symmetries with bicircular high-order-harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 133902 (2016)

    2016

  100. [108]

    Cuomo, V

    S. Cuomo, V. S. Di Cola, F. Giampaolo, G. Rozza, M. Raissi, and F. Piccialli, Scientific machine learning through Physics–Informed neural networks: Where we are and what’s next, J. Sci. Comput.92(2022)

    2022

  101. [109]

    Heren= 3 as we take only the laser intensity but it can be any number, in principle

  102. [110]

    All experiments were conducted on a single NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

  103. [111]

    Lewenstein, K

    M. Lewenstein, K. C. Kulander, K. J. Schafer, and P. H. Bucksbaum, Rings in above-threshold ionization: A quasiclassical analysis, Phys. Rev. A51, 1495 (1995)

    1995

  104. [112]

    This is because experimentally measured quantities are insensitive to the absolute phase at which ionization occurs

    Distributions are commonly averaged over a unit cell of the driving field. This is because experimentally measured quantities are insensitive to the absolute phase at which ionization occurs. Theoretical results explicitly depend on the choice of cycle or half-cycle through th...

  105. [113]

    G. Kim, C. Hofmann, A. S. Maxwell, and C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, Twisted quantum interference in photoelectron holography with elliptically polarized fields, Phys. Rev. A106, 043112 (2022)

    2022

  106. [114]

    Eivazi, M

    H. Eivazi, M. Tahani, P. Schlatter, and R. Vinuesa, Physics-informed neural networks for solving reynolds-averaged navier–stokes equations, Physics of Fluids34, 075117 (2022)

    2022

  107. [115]

    Chen, Neural pde solvers with physics constraints: A comparative study of pinns, drm, and wans (2025), arXiv:2510.09693 [cs.LG]

    J. Chen, Neural pde solvers with physics constraints: A comparative study of pinns, drm, and wans (2025), arXiv:2510.09693 [cs.LG]

    2025

  108. [116]

    Haghighat, M

    E. Haghighat, M. Raissi, A. Moure, H. Gomez, and R. Juanes, A physics-informed deep learning framework for inversion and surrogate modeling in solid mechanics, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering379, 113741 (2021)

    2021

  109. [117]

    Secci, V

    D. Secci, V. A. Godoy, and J. J. G´ omez-Hern´ andez, Physics-informed neural networks for solving transient unconfined groundwater flow, Computers & 21 Geosciences182, 105494 (2024)

    2024

  110. [118]

    Werby, A

    N. Werby, A. S. Maxwell, R. Forbes, P. H. Bucksbaum, and C. F. d. M. Faria, Dissecting subcycle interference in photoelectron holography, Phys. Rev. A104, 013109 (2021)

    2021

  111. [119]

    Werby, A

    N. Werby, A. S. Maxwell, R. Forbes, C. F. d. M. Faria, and P. H. Bucksbaum, Probing two-path electron quantum interference in strong-field ionization with time-correlation filtering, Phys. Rev. A106(2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed July 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.