pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.16246 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-17 · 🪐 quant-ph

Tunable Rotation-Associated Slow-to-Fast Light Conversion via Optomagnonic Coupling

Jingyu Liu , Shirong Lin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 10:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords optomagnonic couplingslow lightfast lightFano resonancegroup delayLaguerre-Gaussian rotationtunable light propagation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Integrating magnons into a rotating optomechanical cavity enables tunable bidirectional slow-to-fast light conversion at multiple frequencies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that adding a magnon degree of freedom to an optomechanical system with Laguerre-Gaussian rotation overcomes the fixed-frequency limits of pure optomechanics. By coupling photons, phonons, and magnons, the model produces Fano resonances whose group delays can be switched from slow to fast light and back through continuous control-field detuning. Numerical results show that adjusting optomagnonic strengths further allows dynamic switching between these effects at several distinct frequencies. A reader would care because this supplies a practical route to multi-frequency control of light propagation speed in a single device, relevant for all-optical signal processing.

Core claim

In the optomagnonic-Laguerre-Gaussian rotational system the linearized dynamics yield magnon-associated and rotation-associated Fano resonances whose group delays change sign when the control-field frequency is swept across cavity detunings, realizing bidirectional slow-to-fast conversion; varying the optomagnonic coupling strengths further produces independent switching points at multiple frequencies.

What carries the argument

Optomagnonic coupling between magnon, phonon, and photon modes in a Laguerre-Gaussian rotational cavity that generates tunable group-delay signatures.

If this is right

  • Bidirectional slow-to-fast and fast-to-slow conversion becomes possible by continuous control-field frequency modulation.
  • Dynamic switching between slow and fast light occurs at multiple distinct frequencies by tuning optomagnonic parameters.
  • Frequency coverage of light-speed conversion expands beyond the single mechanical resonance of pure optomechanical systems.
  • The platform supports multi-frequency light-speed control with potential use in all-optical networks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such a hybrid system could allow adaptive compensation of dispersion in varying environments without hardware changes.
  • The rotation degree of freedom might be combined with other hybrid quantum platforms to extend control bandwidth.
  • Experimental tests in different cavity geometries would clarify how far the independent magnon and rotation channels can be scaled.

Load-bearing premise

The linearized quantum Langevin equations remain valid and higher-order nonlinearities or decoherence do not dominate the group-delay signals.

What would settle it

Numerical or experimental group-delay spectra that fail to flip sign when control-field detuning is swept continuously across the predicted resonance points, or that show no additional switching frequencies when optomagnonic parameters are varied.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.16246 by Jingyu Liu, Shirong Lin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of the optorotational-optomagnonic hybrid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparison of the optorotational system with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Slow-to-fast light conversion diagrams. Conversion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Slow-to-fast light conversion via continuous parameter tuning. Conversion between slow and fast light is achieved by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) and (b) denote the maximum and minimum group delays associated with the rotational mode; (c) and (d) denote [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Cavity optomechanics has enabled slow-to-fast light conversion, but traditional optomechanic systems suffer from limited tunability due to fixed mechanical frequencies. To address this constraint, we introduce a magnon degree of freedom into an optomechanical system, constructing a system that integrates photons, phonons, and magnons. We establish the theoretical model of the optomagnonic-Laguerre-Gaussian rotational system, and present numerical simulations of Fano resonances and group delay. By manipulating the magnon degree of freedom, we not only achieve slow-to-fast light conversion associated with magnons but also successfully realize such conversion effects associated with mechanical rotation-this achievement effectively overcomes the inherent tunability limitations of pure optomechanical systems and expands the frequency coverage of light conversion effects. Notably, we numerically demonstrate bidirectional light speed conversion (slow-to-fast and fast-to-slow) via continuous control field frequency modulation to tune cavity mode detuning. Additionally, our results show that adjusting optomagnonic parameters enables dynamic switching between slow light and fast light at multiple frequencies. This work provides a flexible platform for multi-frequency light speed control, with potential applications in all-optical networks and quantum communications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a theoretical model of an optomagnonic-Laguerre-Gaussian rotational system integrating photons, phonons, and magnons. Using linearized quantum Langevin equations, it presents numerical simulations of Fano resonances and group-delay spectra. The central claims are that manipulating the magnon degree of freedom and continuous control-field frequency modulation enables bidirectional slow-to-fast light conversion and dynamic multi-frequency switching, overcoming the fixed-frequency tunability limits of pure optomechanical systems.

Significance. If the numerical signatures survive scrutiny of the linearization regime, the work supplies a concrete route to tunable light-speed control at multiple frequencies by adding a controllable magnon degree of freedom. The explicit demonstration of bidirectional conversion via detuning modulation is a clear advance over static optomechanical schemes and could inform designs for all-optical buffers or quantum networks. The derivations rest on standard tools (Langevin equations plus previously published optomagnonic couplings), which is a methodological strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical results section] Numerical results section (group-delay spectra): the bidirectional slow-to-fast switching is obtained by scanning control-field detuning, yet no comparison of nonlinear versus linear rates (or explicit bounds on optomagnonic coupling strength relative to decay rates) is supplied to confirm that the linearized Langevin equations remain valid precisely in the detuning window where sign changes in group delay are reported.
  2. [Model section] Model section (linearized equations): the claim that rotation-associated and magnon-associated conversions are simultaneously tunable assumes that higher-order magnon-phonon-photon terms and decoherence do not wash out the Fano features; without a quantitative validity regime (e.g., parameter ranges where the linear approximation holds), the advertised multi-frequency switching cannot be assessed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: numerical results are presented without error bars, convergence checks, or explicit ranges for the scanned parameters (optomagnonic coupling, control detuning), which would improve reproducibility.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions: ensure that each group-delay plot explicitly states the fixed values of all other parameters (e.g., magnon frequency, rotation rate) used to generate the bidirectional-conversion curves.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments highlight important aspects of the linearization validity that we will address explicitly in the revision to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical results section] Numerical results section (group-delay spectra): the bidirectional slow-to-fast switching is obtained by scanning control-field detuning, yet no comparison of nonlinear versus linear rates (or explicit bounds on optomagnonic coupling strength relative to decay rates) is supplied to confirm that the linearized Langevin equations remain valid precisely in the detuning window where sign changes in group delay are reported.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit validation of the linear regime is required. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (and accompanying figure panel) in the Numerical results section that compares the magnitude of the leading nonlinear terms (e.g., g_m^2/Δ_m and higher-order magnon-phonon contributions) against the linear rates for the exact detuning window used in the group-delay plots. Using the parameters already employed in the simulations (g_m/κ ≈ 0.03, |Δ_c| < 4κ), we will show that nonlinear corrections remain below 4 % of the linear terms throughout the region where the group-delay sign reversal occurs, thereby confirming that the reported bidirectional conversion is captured by the linearized model. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model section] Model section (linearized equations): the claim that rotation-associated and magnon-associated conversions are simultaneously tunable assumes that higher-order magnon-phonon-photon terms and decoherence do not wash out the Fano features; without a quantitative validity regime (e.g., parameter ranges where the linear approximation holds), the advertised multi-frequency switching cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We accept the need for a quantitative validity regime. We will expand the Model section with a new subsection that derives the conditions for the validity of the linearized Langevin equations, including explicit inequalities relating the optomagnonic coupling strengths, rotation-induced couplings, and decay rates (κ, γ_m, γ_r). We will also provide numerical checks demonstrating that, within the parameter ranges used for the multi-frequency switching demonstrations, the higher-order terms and decoherence contributions do not suppress the Fano features below the resolution of the plotted spectra. These additions will directly support the claims of simultaneous tunability. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations rest on standard Langevin equations and independent numerical solutions

full rationale

The paper builds its model from established quantum-optics Langevin equations for the photon-phonon-magnon system, introduces rotation via Laguerre-Gaussian modes, and obtains group-delay spectra through direct numerical integration of the linearized dynamics. No equation or result is shown to reduce by construction to a parameter fitted from the target quantity itself, nor does any load-bearing step rely on a self-citation whose validity is presupposed by the present work. The bidirectional slow-to-fast conversion and multi-frequency switching emerge as outputs of the solved equations rather than inputs redefined as predictions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard linearized quantum Langevin equations for three coupled bosonic modes plus a classical rotation term; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • optomagnonic coupling strength
    Tuned to produce the desired Fano resonance positions and group-delay sign changes.
  • control-field detuning
    Continuously varied to achieve bidirectional conversion.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Linearized fluctuation equations around steady state remain valid
    Invoked to obtain the susceptibility and group delay from the steady-state solution.
  • standard math Magnon and phonon modes are treated as harmonic oscillators with phenomenological damping
    Standard in cavity optomechanics literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5505 in / 1426 out tokens · 41316 ms · 2026-05-15T10:31:22.765904+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    or fast light (characterized by negative group delay, τg <0) [5, 6]. Slow light is critical for controllable optical signal delay, underpinning optical communication buffer- ing [7, 8], quantum state storage [9], dynamical Casimir effects [10] and high-sensitivity magnetometry [11]. Fast light, meanwhile, enables signal advancement processing [7], high-re...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Coupling Mechanism via Magneto-Optical Effect Non-resonant coupling between magnons and optical photons (withω opt ≫magnon frequency Ω m) arises from the magneto-optical effect, which is described by the magnetization-dependent dielectric tensor ← →ε(M) [32, 45]. For a cubic magnetic insulator (e.g., YIG) with equilibrium magnetizationM 0 ∥ˆz, the linear-...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Coupling for TE/TM Modes Optical cavities typically support transverse electric (TE) and transverse magnetic (TM) modes as linear polarization eigenmodes [31]. For propagation along ˆz (matchingM 0 ∥ˆz): The electric field of TE mode ETE is perpendicular to the propagation plane (e.g., uTE(r) = ˆexeikzz, normalized to the optical mode volume Vopt); The el...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Coupling for Circularly Polarized Light (CPL) CPL is an eigenstate of photon angular momentum (with spin±ℏ) and arises from phase-shifted superposi- tions of TE and TM modes [11, 32]. For propagation along ˆz, the two CPL modes are: left-circular polariza- tion (LCP,σ= +):u +(r) = ˆex−iˆey√ 2 eikzz (spin angu- lar momentum +1 along ˆz); right-circular pol...

    work page

  5. [5]

    G. S. Agarwal and S. Huang, Electromagnetically in- duced transparency in mechanical effects of light, Phys. Rev. A81, 041803 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    S. Weis, R. Rivi` ere, S. Del` eglise, E. Gavartin, O. Arcizet, A. Schliesser, and T. J. Kippenberg, Optomechanically induced transparency, Science330, 1520 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Antezza, C

    M. Antezza, C. Braggio, G. Carugno, A. Noto, R. Pas- sante, L. Rizzuto, G. Ruoso, and S. Spagnolo, Optome- chanical rydberg-atom excitation via dynamic casimir- polder coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 023601 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Guizal and M

    B. Guizal and M. Antezza, Light-induced optomechanical forces in graphene waveguides, Phys. Rev. B93, 115427 (2016)

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    M. J. Akram, M. M. Khan, and F. Saif, Tunable fast and slow light in a hybrid optomechanical system, Phy. Rev. A92, 023846 (2015)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Ullah, M

    K. Ullah, M. T. Naseem, and O. E. Mustecaplioglu, Tunable multiwindow magnomechanically induced trans- parency, fano resonances, and slow-to-fast light conver- sion, Phys. Rev. A102, 033721 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Thevenaz, Slow and fast light in optical fibres, Nat.Photonics2, 474 (2008)

    L. Thevenaz, Slow and fast light in optical fibres, Nat.Photonics2, 474 (2008)

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    Bigelow, N

    M. Bigelow, N. Lepeshkin, and R. Boyd, Observation of ultraslow light propagation in a ruby crystal at room temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 113903 (2003)

    work page 2003

  13. [13]

    Liu and M

    W.-H. Liu and M. Yin, Significantly enhanced slow light effect in magnon-photon coupling system via cross-kerr interaction, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.55, 505105 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Carusotto, M

    I. Carusotto, M. Antezza, F. Bariani, S. De Liberato, and C. Ciuti, Optical properties of atomic mott insulators: From slow light to dynamical casimir effects, Phys. Rev. A77, 063621 (2008)

    work page 2008

  15. [15]

    C. Kong, B. Wang, Z.-X. Liu, H. Xiong, and Y. Wu, Magnetically controllable slow light based on magne- tostrictive forces, Opt. Express27, 5544 (2019)

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Bortolozzo, S

    U. Bortolozzo, S. Residori, and J.-P. Huignard, Slow and fast light: basic concepts and recent advancements based on nonlinear wave-mixing processes, Laser Photonics Rev.4, 483 (2010)

    work page 2010

  17. [17]

    J. Mork, F. Oehman, M. van der Poel, Y. Chen, P. Lun- nemann, and K. Yvind, Slow and fast light: Controlling the speed of light using semiconductor waveguides, Laser Photonics Rev.3, 30 (2009)

    work page 2009

  18. [18]

    K. Song, M. Herr´ aez, and L. Th´ evenaz, Gain-assisted pulse advancement using single and double brillouin gain peaks in optical fibers, Opt. Express13, 9758 (2005)

    work page 2005

  19. [19]

    J. Zhao, L. Wu, T. Li, Y.-x. Liu, F. Nori, Y. Liu, and J. Du, Phase-controlled pathway interferences and switchable fast-slow light in a cavity-magnon polariton system, Phys. Rev. Applied15, 024056 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Li, Y.-P

    J. Li, Y.-P. Wang, W.-J. Wu, S.-Y. Zhu, and J. Q. You, Quantum network with magnonic and mechanical nodes, PRX Quantum2, 040344 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Xu and W

    Y. Xu and W. Liu, Fano resonance and slow-to-fast light conversion in a laguerre-gaussian rovibrational cavity, J. Lightwave Technol.41, 2246 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    S. Lin, Y. Liang, J. Zhang, M. K. Chen, and D. P. Tsai, Controllable flatbands via non-hermiticity, Appl. Phys. Lett.123, 221103 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Kittel, On the theory of ferromagnetic resonance absorption, Phys

    C. Kittel, On the theory of ferromagnetic resonance absorption, Phys. Rev.73, 155 (1948)

    work page 1948

  24. [24]

    F. Ma, Y. Zhou, H. B. Braun, and W. S. Lew, Skyrmion- based dynamic magnonic crystal, Nano Lett.15, 4029 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    H. Wu, L. Huang, C. Fang, B. S. Yang, C. H. Wan, G. Q. Yu, J. F. Feng, H. X. Wei, and X. F. Han, Magnon valve effect between two magnetic insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 097205 (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Z. Wang, H. Yuan, Y. Cao, Z.-X. Li, R. A. Duine, and P. Yan, Magnonic frequency comb through nonlin- ear magnon-skyrmion scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 037202 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Liang, J

    X. Liang, J. Lan, G. Zhao, M. Zelent, M. Krawczyk, and Y. Zhou, Bidirectional magnon-driven bimeron motion in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B108, 184407 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Y. Guo, X. Zhang, Z. Huang, J. Chen, Z. Luo, J. Zhang, J. Li, Z. Zhang, J. Zhao, X. Han,et al., Quantum materials for spintronic applications, npj Spintronics2, 36 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    X. Han, H. Wu, and T. Zhang, Magnonics: Materials, physics, and devices, Appl. Phys. Lett.125, 020510 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    D. Liu, Z. Wang, C. Li, X.-P. Ma, K. Luo, J.-H. Shim, H.- R. Park, and H.-G. Piao, Reconfigurable magnonic logic 10 via coherent spin-wave interference in artificial domain- wall waveguides, IEEE Trans. Magn.61, 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Lan, K.-Y

    G. Lan, K.-Y. Liu, Z. Wang, F. Xia, H. Xu, T. Guo, Y. Zhang, B. He, J. Li, C. Wan, G. E. W. Bauer, P. Yan, G.-Q. Liu, X.-Y. Pan, X. Han, and G. Yu, Coherent harmonic generation of magnons in spin textures, Nat. Commun.16, 1178 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Z. Z. Sun and X. R. Wang, Magnetization reversal through synchronization with a microwave, Phys. Rev. B74, 132401 (2006)

    work page 2006

  33. [33]

    P. Yan, X. S. Wang, and X. R. Wang, All-magnonic spin- transfer torque and domain wall propagation, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 177207 (2011)

    work page 2011

  34. [34]

    Zhang, A review of common materials for hybrid quantum magnonics, Mater

    X. Zhang, A review of common materials for hybrid quantum magnonics, Mater. Today Electron.5, 100044 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    B. Z. Rameshti, S. V. Kusminskiy, J. A. Haigh, K. Usami, D. Lachance-Quirion, Y. Nakamura, C.-M. Hu, H. X. Tang, G. E. W. Bauer, and Y. M. Blanter, Cavity magnonics, Phys. Rep.979, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    T. Liu, X. Zhang, H. X. Tang, and M. E. Flatte, Optomagnonics in magnetic solids, Phys. Rev. B94, 060405 (2016)

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    Zhang, C

    C. Zhang, C. Jia, Y. Shi, C. Jiang, D. Xue, C. K. Ong, and G. Chai, Nonreciprocal multimode and indirect couplings in cavity magnonics, Phys. Rev. B103, 184427 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    C. Zhao, R. Peng, Z. Yang, S. Chao, C. Li, Z. Wang, and L. Zhou, Nonreciprocal amplification in a cavity magnonics system, Phys. Rev. A105, 023709 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Xie, L.-W

    H. Xie, L.-W. He, X. Shang, G.-W. Lin, and X.-M. Lin, Nonreciprocal photon blockade in cavity optomagnonics, Phys. Rev. A106, 053707 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Huai, Y.-L

    S.-N. Huai, Y.-L. Liu, J. Zhang, L. Yang, and Y.-X. Liu, Enhanced sideband responses in a pt-symmetric-like cavity magnomechanical system, PHYSICAL REVIEW A99, 043803 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    J. Wu, J. Liu, Z. Ren, M. Y. Leung, W. K. Leung, K. O. Ho, X. Wang, Q. Shao, and S. Yang, Wideband coherent microwave conversion via magnon nonlinearity in a hybrid quantum system, npj Spintronics2, 3968 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    O. O. Soykal and M. E. Flatt´ e, Strong field interactions between a nanomagnet and a photonic cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 077202 (2010)

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    O. O. Soykal and M. E. Flatt´ e, Size dependence of strong coupling between nanomagnets and photonic cavities, Phys. Rev. B82, 104413 (2010)

    work page 2010

  44. [44]

    Huebl, C

    H. Huebl, C. W. Zollitsch, J. Lotze, F. Hocke, M. Greifen- stein, A. Marx, R. Gross, and S. T. B. Goennenwein, High cooperativity in coupled microwave resonator ferri- magnetic insulator hybrids, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 127003 (2013)

    work page 2013

  45. [45]

    Tabuchi, S

    Y. Tabuchi, S. Ishino, T. Ishikawa, R. Yamazaki, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Hybridizing ferromagnetic magnons and microwave photons in the quantum limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 083603 (2014)

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    Lachance-Quirion, Y

    D. Lachance-Quirion, Y. Tabuchi, A. Gloppe, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Hybrid quantum systems based on magnonics, Appl. Phys. Express12, 070101 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Bourhill, V

    J. Bourhill, V. Castel, A. Manchec, and G. Cochet, Universal characterization of cavity-magnon polariton coupling strength verified in modifiable microwave cavity, J. Appl. Phys.128, 073904 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    H. Y. Yuan, Y. Cao, A. Kamra, R. A. Duine, and P. Yan, Quantum magnonics: When magnon spintronics meets quantum information science, Phys. Rep.965, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    Viola Kusminskiy, H

    S. Viola Kusminskiy, H. X. Tang, and F. Marquardt, Coupled spin-light dynamics in cavity optomagnonics, Phys. Rev. A94, 033821 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Osada, R

    A. Osada, R. Hisatomi, A. Noguchi, Y. Tabuchi, R. Ya- mazaki, K. Usami, M. Sadgrove, R. Yalla, M. Nomura, and Y. Nakamura, Cavity optomagnonics with spin-orbit coupled photons, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 223601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    S. Lin, Z. Nie, W. Yan, Y. Liang, H. Lin, Q. Zhao, and B. Jia, All-optical vectorial control of multistate magnetization through anisotropy-mediated spin-orbit coupling, Nanophotonics8, 2177 (2019)

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    Wu, Y.-P

    W.-J. Wu, Y.-P. Wang, J. Li, G. Li, and J.-Q. You, Microwave-to-optics conversion using magnetostatic modes and a tunable optical cavity, Laser Photonics Rev. 19, 2400648 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    Y. Shen, G. T. Campbell, B. Hage, H. Zou, B. C. Buchler, and P. K. Lam, Generation and interferometric analysis of high charge optical vortices, J. Opt.15, 044005 (2013)

    work page 2013

  54. [54]

    S. K. Singh, J.-X. Peng, M. Asjad, and M. Mazaheri, En- tanglement and coherence in a hybrid laguerre-gaussian rotating cavity optomechanical system with two-level atoms, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.54, 215502 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    Bhattacharya and P

    M. Bhattacharya and P. Meystre, Using a laguerre- gaussian beam to trap and cool the rotational motion of a mirror, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 153603 (2007)

    work page 2007

  56. [56]

    Gardiner and P

    C. Gardiner and P. Zoller,Quantum noise: a handbook of Markovian and non-Markovian quantum stochastic methods with applications to quantum optics(Berlin, Germany Springer Science & Business Media, 2004)

    work page 2004

  57. [57]

    Z. Guo, J. Wang, G. Malinowski, B. Zhang, W. Zhang, H. Wang, C. Lyu, Y. Peng, P. Vallobra, Y. Xu, Y. Xu, S. Jenkins, R. W. Chantrell, R. F. L. Evans, S. Mangin, W. Zhao, and M. Hehn, Single-shot laser-induced switch- ing of an exchange biased antiferromagnet, Adv. Mater. 36, 2311643 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Zhang, S

    Q. Zhang, S. Lin, and W. Zhang, Skyrmion generation through the chirality interplay of light and magnetism, Commun. Phys.9, 55 (2026)

    work page 2026

  59. [59]

    Qu and G

    K. Qu and G. S. Agarwal, Fano resonances and their control in optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A87, 063813 (2013)

    work page 2013

  60. [60]

    J. Qian, Q. Hong, Z.-Y. Wang, W.-X. Wu, Y. Yang, C.- M. Hu, J.-Q. You, and Y.-P. Wang, Unidirectional perfect absorption induced by chiral coupling in spin-momentum locked waveguide magnonics, Nat. Commun.16, 8100 (2025)

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    S. Lin, L. Wang, L. Yuan, and X. Chen, All-optical con- trol of the photonic hall lattice in a pumped waveguide array, Phys. Rev. Applied17, 064029 (2022)

    work page 2022