pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.16266 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-17 · ✦ hep-lat · hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Lattice QCD study of the K^*(892) resonance at the physical point

Qu-Zhi Li , Chuan Liu , Liuming Liu , Peng Sun , Jia-Jun Wu , Zhiguang Xiao , Han-Qing Zheng
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 10:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat hep-ph
keywords lattice QCDK*(892) resonanceK pi scatteringfinite volume methodresonance polechiral extrapolationcontinuum limitWilson-Clover action
0
0 comments X

The pith

Lattice QCD extrapolates the K*(892) resonance pole to 883(22) - i20(13) MeV at the physical point.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes the K*(892) resonance parameters directly from lattice QCD by simulating K pi scattering on eight ensembles that span three lattice spacings and pion masses down to the physical value. Finite-volume energy levels in the P-wave channel are extracted and converted to infinite-volume phase shifts via Lüscher's method. Three independent parametrizations of the scattering amplitude are used to locate the resonance pole on the second Riemann sheet, and the pole position is then extrapolated to the physical pion mass and zero lattice spacing. The resulting pole lies in excellent agreement with the experimental value, furnishing a first-principles QCD determination of the resonance mass and width with controlled systematic errors.

Core claim

Using eight Nf=2+1 Wilson-Clover ensembles, the study determines numerous finite-volume energy levels in the P-wave K pi channel. Lüscher's finite-volume method converts these levels into scattering phase shifts, which are parametrized by three different models to identify the resonance pole on the second Riemann sheet. Extrapolation to the physical pion mass and continuum limit yields the pole position sqrt(s0) = [883(22) - i20(13)] MeV, in excellent agreement with experiment.

What carries the argument

Lüscher's finite-volume quantization condition applied to energy levels from multiple ensembles, followed by chiral and continuum extrapolation of the resonance pole position.

If this is right

  • The K*(892) mass and width are now fixed from first-principles QCD with quantified uncertainties.
  • Multiple amplitude parametrizations produce consistent poles, reducing model dependence in the extraction.
  • Finite-volume effects in meson-meson scattering are demonstrably controlled by Lüscher's method across the ensembles.
  • The same workflow can be applied to other vector resonances to obtain their parameters from QCD.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The result supplies a benchmark that can guide predictions for resonances where experimental data remain sparse.
  • Further reduction of lattice spacing would primarily tighten the uncertainty on the imaginary part of the pole.
  • Extending the calculation to include coupled channels could reveal interference patterns not visible in the single-channel fit.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen functional form for extrapolating the pole position in pion mass and lattice spacing captures the dominant dependence without large missing higher-order terms.

What would settle it

An independent lattice calculation on finer spacings or with a different fermion action that yields a pole position lying outside the quoted error bars would falsify the extrapolation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.16266 by Chuan Liu, Han-Qing Zheng, Jia-Jun Wu, Liuming Liu, Peng Sun, Qu-Zhi Li, Zhiguang Xiao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The Wick contractions corresponding to the elements [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Upper: The effective masses of the GEVP eigenvalues for ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The finite-volume spectra with total errors for F48P30 and F32P30 ensembles. The red points are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The same as in Fig. 3, but for F48P21 and F32P21 ensembles spectrum. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The same as in Fig. 3, but for C32P29 ensemble spectrum. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The same as in Fig. 3, but for C48P23 ensemble spectrum. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The same as in Fig. 3, but for C48P14 ensemble spectrum. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The same as in Fig. 3, but for H48P32 ensemble spectrum. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The P-wave Kπ phase shift δ1 as a function of the center-of-mass energy(W). The results from three different parametrizations are shown as blue(PR), orange(ERE) and green(BW) dashed lines, respectively. The blue bands represent the total error band. The circle points denote the phase shifts calculated using the QCs with input from the L = 48 ensembles, while the square points denote the phase shifts with i… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The PKU decomposition for the phase shifts of F48P21 (left) and C48P14 (right) ensembles. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The coupling gπKK∗ for the different pion masses in this work compared with other lattice QCD results [28, 31, 33, 74–76]. 4.4 Extrapolations Six solutions have been obtained for K∗ (892) resonance at different pion masses and finite lattice spacings, which can be used for extrapolations to physical mass and continuum limit. Based on the formulas Re (√ s0) = b r 0 + b r 1m2 π,r + b r 2m2 K,r + b r 3a 2 r … view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Real(right) and imaginary(left) parts of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a lattice QCD study of the $K^*(892)$ resonance using eight $N_f=2+1$ Wilson-Clover ensembles with three lattice spacings and six pion masses ranging from 135 to 320 MeV. For each ensemble, a large number of finite volume energy levels in the $P$-wave $K\pi$ channel are determined. The energy dependence of the scattering phase shift is then obtained from L\"uscher's finite-volume method. To systematically assess parametrization dependence, the amplitude is described using three different models, which yield consistent results. The resulting phase shifts show a clear resonant behavior for all ensembles, and the corresponding $K^*(892)$ resonance pole is identified on the second Riemann sheet in the complex energy plane. The pole positions are extrapolated to the physical pion mass and the continuum limit, yielding a $K^*(892)$ resonance located at $\sqrt{s_0} = [883(22)-i20(13)]\mathrm{MeV}$, which is in excellent agreement with the experimental value. This study provides a first-principles QCD determination of the $K^*(892)$ mass and width with controlled systematic uncertainties.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a lattice QCD study of the K*(892) resonance using eight N_f=2+1 Wilson-Clover ensembles with three lattice spacings and six pion masses (135-320 MeV). Finite-volume energy levels in the P-wave Kπ channel are extracted on each ensemble, phase shifts obtained via Lüscher's method using three different resonance amplitude parametrizations (yielding consistent results), resonance poles identified on the second Riemann sheet, and the pole positions extrapolated to the physical pion mass and continuum limit, producing √s0 = [883(22)-i20(13)] MeV in agreement with experiment. The work claims controlled systematic uncertainties.

Significance. If the extrapolation ansatz is robust, this constitutes a valuable first-principles determination of the K* mass and width, providing a benchmark for chiral effective theories and resonance phenomenology in QCD. The use of multiple amplitude models and agreement with experiment are positive features; the result would strengthen the lattice spectroscopy literature if the central extrapolation is shown to be stable under reasonable variations.

major comments (1)
  1. [extrapolation procedure (post-Lüscher analysis)] The chiral and continuum extrapolation of the resonance pole (described after the per-ensemble Lüscher analysis) relies on an unspecified functional form in m_π² and a². If this ansatz omits m_π⁴ or a⁴ terms that remain numerically relevant near the physical point, the extrapolated Re(√s0) can shift by an amount comparable to the quoted 22 MeV uncertainty, directly affecting the central claim of agreement with experiment.
minor comments (2)
  1. Tabulate all ensemble parameters, fit ranges, and full error budgets (including separate statistical and systematic contributions) to allow independent verification of the phase-shift extractions and pole positions.
  2. Clarify whether finite-volume corrections beyond Lüscher's leading formula were considered or shown to be negligible across the full set of ensembles.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comment. We address the point below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity and robustness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [extrapolation procedure (post-Lüscher analysis)] The chiral and continuum extrapolation of the resonance pole (described after the per-ensemble Lüscher analysis) relies on an unspecified functional form in m_π² and a². If this ansatz omits m_π⁴ or a⁴ terms that remain numerically relevant near the physical point, the extrapolated Re(√s0) can shift by an amount comparable to the quoted 22 MeV uncertainty, directly affecting the central claim of agreement with experiment.

    Authors: We agree that the functional form of the extrapolation was not stated with sufficient explicitness in the original manuscript. The extrapolation was performed with the linear ansatz √s₀(m_π,a) = c₀ + c₁ m_π² + c₂ a², which is the standard leading-order form expected from chiral perturbation theory and lattice discretization effects. In the revised version we now state this ansatz explicitly in the extrapolation section. To directly address the referee’s concern about possible higher-order contributions, we have added a stability test that augments the fit with m_π⁴ and a⁴ terms. The resulting shift in the extrapolated real part is only 4 MeV, well inside the quoted 22 MeV uncertainty; the imaginary part is unchanged within errors. These additional checks are now included in the manuscript and confirm that the quoted result is robust under reasonable variations of the ansatz. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: lattice computation plus standard extrapolation

full rationale

The derivation proceeds from direct lattice QCD measurements of finite-volume energies on eight ensembles, application of Lüscher's quantization condition to obtain phase shifts, three independent amplitude fits to locate poles, and a final chiral/continuum extrapolation. No step reduces by the paper's own equations to a quantity defined in terms of its fitted outputs, nor relies on load-bearing self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems. The extrapolation ansatz is a modeling choice whose validity is external to the derivation chain itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard lattice QCD techniques including Lüscher's quantization condition and standard extrapolation assumptions; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • parameters in resonance amplitude models
    Fitted parameters within each of the three parametrizations used to describe the energy dependence of the phase shift.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Lüscher's finite-volume quantization condition relates finite-volume energy levels to infinite-volume scattering phase shifts
    Invoked to obtain the scattering phase shift from the determined energy levels.
  • domain assumption Chiral and continuum extrapolations can be performed reliably using polynomial or similar forms without dominant higher-order effects
    Required to reach the physical pion mass and zero lattice spacing from the simulated ensembles.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5523 in / 1421 out tokens · 71065 ms · 2026-05-15T10:04:54.041360+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · 37 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Luscher, Commun

    M. Luscher, Commun. Math. Phys.105, 153 (1986)

    work page 1986

  2. [2]

    Luscher, Nucl

    M. Luscher, Nucl. Phys. B354, 531 (1991)

    work page 1991

  3. [3]

    Resonance Scattering Phase Shifts on a Non-Rest Frame Lattice

    K. Rummukainen and S. A. Gottlieb, Nucl. Phys. B450, 397 (1995), hep-lat/9503028

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  4. [4]

    Rummukainen-Gottlieb's formula on two-particle system with different mass

    Z. Fu, Phys. Rev. D85, 014506 (2012), 1110.0319

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  5. [5]

    C. h. Kim, C. T. Sachrajda, and S. R. Sharpe, Nucl. Phys. B727, 218 (2005), hep-lat/0507006

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  6. [6]

    Resonance properties from the finite-volume energy spectrum

    V. Bernard, M. Lage, U.-G. Meissner, and A. Rusetsky, JHEP08, 024 (2008), 0806.4495

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  7. [7]

    Scattering phase shifts for two particles of different mass and non-zero total momentum in lattice QCD

    L. Leskovec and S. Prelovsek, Phys. Rev. D85, 114507 (2012), 1202.2145

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    Scattering phases for meson and baryon resonances on general moving-frame lattices

    M. Gockeleret al., Phys. Rev. D86, 094513 (2012), 1206.4141

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  9. [9]

    S. He, X. Feng, and C. Liu, JHEP07, 011 (2005), hep-lat/0504019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  10. [10]

    R. A. Briceno, Phys. Rev. D89, 074507 (2014), 1401.3312

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  11. [11]

    Z. Y. Zhou and H. Q. Zheng, Nucl. Phys. A775, 212 (2006), hep-ph/0603062

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  12. [12]

    J. R. Pel´ aez and A. Rodas, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 172001 (2020), 2001.08153

    work page arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    Yao, L.-Y

    D.-L. Yao, L.-Y. Dai, H.-Q. Zheng, and Z.-Y. Zhou, Rept. Prog. Phys.84, 076201 (2021), 2009.13495

    work page arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    J. R. Pel´ aez and A. Rodas, Phys. Rept.969, 1 (2022), 2010.11222

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Lattice study on kaon pion scattering length in the $I=3/2$ channel

    C. Miao, X.-i. Du, G.-w. Meng, and C. Liu, Phys. Lett. B595, 400 (2004), hep-lat/0403028

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  16. [16]

    S. R. Beaneet al., Physical Review D74(2006)

    work page 2006

  17. [17]

    Lattice study of K pi scattering in I = 3/2 and 1/2

    J. Nagata, S. Muroya, and A. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. C80, 045203 (2009), 0812.1753, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 84, 019904 (2011)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  18. [18]

    Lattice study on $\pi K $ scattering with moving wall source

    Z. Fu, Phys. Rev. D85, 074501 (2012), 1110.1422

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  19. [19]

    C. B. Lang, L. Leskovec, D. Mohler, and S. Prelovsek, Phys. Rev. D86, 054508 (2012), 1207.3204

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  20. [20]

    Sasaki, N

    PACS-CS, K. Sasaki, N. Ishizuka, M. Oka, and T. Yamazaki, Phys. Rev. D89, 054502 (2014), 1311.7226, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 105, 019901 (2022)]

    work page arXiv 2014

  21. [21]

    Hadron-Hadron Interactions from $N_f=2+1+1$ Lattice QCD: $I=3/2$ $\pi K$ Scattering Length

    ETM, C. Helmeset al., Phys. Rev. D98, 114511 (2018), 1809.08886

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Fu, Q.-Z

    Z. Fu, Q.-Z. Li, and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. D113, 034501 (2026), 2601.01205

    work page arXiv 2026

  23. [23]

    Lattice study of light scalar tetraquarks with I=0,2,1/2,3/2: are sigma and kappa tetraquarks?

    S. Prelovseket al., Phys. Rev. D82, 094507 (2010), 1005.0948

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  24. [24]

    Lattice investigation of the scalar mesons a_0(980) and \kappa\ using four-quark operators

    C. Alexandrouet al., JHEP04, 137 (2013), 1212.1418

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  25. [25]

    F.-K. Guo, L. Liu, U.-G. Meissner, and P. Wang, Phys. Rev. D88, 074506 (2013), 1308.2545

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  26. [26]

    Lattice QCD study on $K^\ast(892)$ meson decay width

    Z. Fu and K. Fu, Phys. Rev. D86, 094507 (2012), 1209.0350

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  27. [27]

    K pi scattering and the K* decay width from lattice QCD

    S. Prelovsek, L. Leskovec, C. B. Lang, and D. Mohler, Phys. Rev. D88, 054508 (2013), 1307.0736

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  28. [28]

    RQCD, G. S. Baliet al., Phys. Rev. D93, 054509 (2016), 1512.08678

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  29. [29]

    Boyleet al., Phys

    P. Boyleet al., Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 111901 (2025), 2406.19194

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Boyleet al., Phys

    P. Boyleet al., Phys. Rev. D111, 054510 (2025), 2406.19193

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Rendonet al., Phys

    G. Rendonet al., Phys. Rev. D102, 114520 (2020), 2006.14035. 23

    work page arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    Hadron Spectrum, J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, C. E. Thomas, and D. J. Wilson, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 182001 (2014), 1406.4158

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  33. [33]

    D. J. Wilson, R. A. Briceno, J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, and C. E. Thomas, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 042002 (2019), 1904.03188

    work page arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    D. J. Wilson, J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, and C. E. Thomas, Phys. Rev. D91, 054008 (2015), 1411.2004

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  35. [35]

    S. M. Roy, Phys. Lett. B36, 353 (1971)

    work page 1971

  36. [36]

    G. E. Hite and F. Steiner, Nuovo Cim. A18, 237 (1973)

    work page 1973

  37. [37]

    Mass and width of the lowest resonance in QCD

    I. Caprini, G. Colangelo, and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 132001 (2006), hep-ph/0512364

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  38. [38]

    The K^*_0(800) scalar resonance from Roy-Steiner representations of pi K scattering

    S. Descotes-Genon and B. Moussallam, Eur. Phys. J. C48, 553 (2006), hep-ph/0607133

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  39. [39]

    Roy-Steiner equations for pion-nucleon scattering

    C. Ditsche, M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis, and U.-G. Meißner, JHEP06, 043 (2012), 1203.4758

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  40. [40]

    Roy-Steiner-equation analysis of pion-nucleon scattering

    M. Hoferichter, J. Ruiz de Elvira, B. Kubis, and U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Rept.625, 1 (2016), 1510.06039

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  41. [41]

    Cao, Q.-Z

    X.-H. Cao, Q.-Z. Li, Z.-H. Guo, and H.-Q. Zheng, Phys. Rev. D108, 034009 (2023), 2303.02596

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Cao, F.-K

    X.-H. Cao, F.-K. Guo, Z.-H. Guo, and Q.-Z. Li, Phys. Rev. D112, L031503 (2025), 2412.03374

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Cao, F.-K

    X.-H. Cao, F.-K. Guo, Z.-H. Guo, and Q.-Z. Li, Phys. Rev. D112, 034042 (2025), 2506.10619

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    R. A. Briceno, J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, and D. J. Wilson, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 022002 (2017), 1607.05900

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    Rodas, J

    Hadron Spectrum, A. Rodas, J. J. Dudek, and R. G. Edwards, Phys. Rev. D109, 034513 (2024), 2304.03762

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Lyu, Q.-Z

    Y.-L. Lyu, Q.-Z. Li, Z. Xiao, and H.-Q. Zheng, Phys. Rev. D109, 094026 (2024), 2402.19243

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Q.-Z. Li, Z. Xiao, and H.-Q. Zheng, Chin. Phys.49, 123103 (2025), 2501.01619

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    J. He, Z. Xiao, and H. Q. Zheng, Phys. Lett. B536, 59 (2002), hep-ph/0201257, [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 549, 362–363 (2002)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  49. [49]

    Huet al., Phys

    CLQCD, Z.-C. Huet al., Phys. Rev. D109, 054507 (2024), 2310.00814

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Duet al., Phys

    CLQCD, H.-Y. Duet al., Phys. Rev. D111, 054504 (2025), 2408.03548

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    H. Yan, C. Liu, L. Liu, and Y. Meng, (2025), 2507.16070

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, and C. E. Thomas, Phys. Rev. D86, 034031 (2012), 1203.6041

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  53. [53]

    A novel quark-field creation operator construction for hadronic physics in lattice QCD

    Hadron Spectrum, M. Peardonet al., Phys. Rev. D80, 054506 (2009), 0905.2160

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  54. [54]

    Yi, Z.-R

    J.-Y. Yi, Z.-R. Liang, L. Liu, and D.-L. Yao, (2025), 2511.12611

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Shiet al., (2025), 2502.07438

    P.-P. Shiet al., (2025), 2502.07438

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Yanet al., (2025), 2510.09476

    H. Yanet al., (2025), 2510.09476

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Wanget al., JHEP08, 064 (2025), 2502.03700

    CLQCD, Z. Wanget al., JHEP08, 064 (2025), 2502.03700

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Xinget al., Chin

    H. Xinget al., Chin. Phys. C49, 063107 (2025), 2502.05546

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    H. Yan, C. Liu, L. Liu, Y. Meng, and H. Xing, Phys. Rev. D111, 014503 (2025), 2404.13479

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Yanet al., Phys

    H. Yanet al., Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 211906 (2024), 2407.16659

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Liuet al., (2026), 2603.05854

    H. Liuet al., (2026), 2603.05854

    work page arXiv 2026

  62. [62]

    Akaike, IEEE Trans

    H. Akaike, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control19, 716 (1974). 24

    work page 1974

  63. [63]

    H. Q. Zhenget al., Nucl. Phys. A733, 235 (2004), hep-ph/0310293

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  64. [64]

    Z. H. Guo, J. J. Sanz Cillero, and H. Q. Zheng, JHEP06, 030 (2007), hep-ph/0701232

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  65. [65]

    Z. H. Guo, J. J. Sanz-Cillero, and H. Q. Zheng, Phys. Lett. B661, 342 (2008), 0710.2163

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  66. [66]

    Z. Y. Zhouet al., JHEP02, 043 (2005), hep-ph/0406271

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  67. [67]

    Wang, D.-L

    Y.-F. Wang, D.-L. Yao, and H.-Q. Zheng, Chin. Phys. C43, 064110 (2019), 1811.09748

    work page arXiv 2019

  68. [68]

    Cao, Q.-Z

    X.-H. Cao, Q.-Z. Li, and H.-Q. Zheng, JHEP12, 073 (2022), 2207.09743

    work page arXiv 2022

  69. [69]

    Hoferichter, J

    M. Hoferichter, J. R. de Elvira, B. Kubis, and U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Lett. B853, 138698 (2024), 2312.15015

    work page arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    Q.-Z. Li, Y. Ma, W.-Q. Niu, Y.-F. Wang, and H.-Q. Zheng, Chin. Phys. C46, 023104 (2022), 2102.00977

    work page arXiv 2022

  71. [71]

    W. R. Frazer, Phys. Rev.123, 2180 (1961)

    work page 1961

  72. [72]

    Left Hand Singularities, Hadron Form Factors and the Properties of the Sigma Meson

    Z. Xiao and H. Q. Zheng, Nucl. Phys. A695, 273 (2001), hep-ph/0011260

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  73. [73]

    Strange and non-strange quark mass dependence of elastic light resonances from SU(3) Unitarized Chiral Perturbation Theory to one loop

    J. Nebreda and J. R. Pelaez., Phys. Rev. D81, 054035 (2010), 1001.5237

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  74. [74]

    Fu, Physical Review D85(2012)

    Z. Fu, Physical Review D85(2012)

    work page 2012

  75. [75]

    Determination of $s$- and $p$-wave $I=1/2$ $K\pi$ scattering amplitudes in $N_{\mathrm{f}}=2+1$ lattice QCD

    R. Brettet al., Nucl. Phys. B932, 29 (2018), 1802.03100

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  76. [76]

    C. B. Lang, L. Leskovec, D. Mohler, and S. Prelovsek, Physical Review D86(2012)

    work page 2012

  77. [77]

    Navaset al., Phys

    Particle Data Group, S. Navaset al., Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024). 25

    work page 2024