Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 26 references

Thermopneumatic pixels—sealed cavities heated by a thin wire—produce forces above 1 N and millimeter displacements in milliseconds, all at under 10 volts.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 17:59 UTC pith:A25B5HQT

load-bearing objection A genuinely useful actuator paper with direct force/displacement/durability measurements; the mechanism inference and the dynamic claims are softer than the abstract suggests. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2603.16750 v2 pith:A25B5HQT submitted 2026-03-17 cs.HC cs.ETcs.RO

Thermopneumatic Pixels: Fast, Localized, Robust, Low-Voltage Touch Feedback

Max Linnander , Yon Visell This is my paper
classification cs.HC cs.ETcs.RO
keywords Thermopneumatic actuatorHaptic feedbackTactile displayLow-voltage actuationJoule heatingPDMS membraneFlexible electronicsPerceptual evaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper introduces a tactile actuator called a thermopneumatic pixel (TPP): a small sealed cavity containing a suspended nickel-chromium wire that is heated with brief, low-voltage electrical pulses. The heat rapidly warms the trapped air, raising its pressure and deflecting a flexible membrane to produce localized force and displacement on the skin. The authors show that these pixels can deliver forces exceeding 1 N and displacements approaching 1 mm with response times of 5–100 ms, in packages less than 3 mm thick, and that arrays of pixels spaced 4 mm apart can be driven with simple microcontroller-based electronics. They also report perceptual results: people could identify which pixel in a four-pixel array was active 95.5% of the time, and perceived intensity grew linearly with driving power. The central claim is that this combination—simple construction, low voltage, fast response, and spatial resolution—makes thermopneumatic actuation a practical and accessible approach for embedding tactile feedback into interfaces.

Core claim

The core discovery is that suspending a thin resistive wire inside a small sealed cavity and heating it with low-voltage pulses converts electrical energy into fast, localized mechanical output through gas expansion. In the demonstrated devices, a 48 AWG NiCr wire is suspended in a cavity of 6–32 µL; Joule heating raises the wire temperature to over 1000 °C, which heats the surrounding air to near 100 °C and generates forces up to 1.07 N and free displacements up to 0.96 mm. The response is governed by a simple first-order thermal model, with a measured cooling time constant of 110 ms. The pixel's output scales with cavity length and membrane aperture area, and a clear operating envelope exi

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the thermopneumatic pixel: a sealed cavity with a suspended resistive wire. The wire is heated by Joule heating (P_el = V^2/R_wire), and because the wire has low thermal mass, it heats quickly; heat transfers to the enclosed air, which expands and deflects an elastic PDMS membrane. The quantitative backbone is the ideal gas law applied to the cavity: gauge pressure P(t) = F(t)/A, and air temperature T_air(t) = T_0(F(t)/(P_0 A) + 1), where A is the pixel area. This relationship connects measured force to inferred pressure and temperature. A lumped-parameter thermal model, T_wire(t) = P_el R_thermal (1 - e^{-t/τ}), describes the wire's temperature dynamics and is used

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes the cavity stays effectively sealed during a pulse and that the measured membrane force equals gas pressure times pixel area, with no significant gas leakage or membrane tension, so the inferred pressures and temperatures stand or fall with that assumption.

What would settle it

Place a miniature pressure sensor inside the cavity while driving a TPP and compare the product of measured gauge pressure and pixel area with the load-cell force; if they deviate, the simple thermopneumatic explanation needs revision. Alternatively, intentionally vent the cavity to the atmosphere; if the membrane still produces comparable force, then another mechanism (such as membrane thermal expansion) is contributing.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Arrays of TPPs at 4 mm spacing can present spatially distinct cues; users identified the active pixel in a 2×2 array on the finger pad with 95.5% accuracy.
  • The simple drive circuit—MOSFETs gated by a microcontroller—can operate up to forty pixels simultaneously, making scalable integration straightforward.
  • Force output increases with pixel area, so designers can tailor force and displacement to different body sites or applications by choosing cavity dimensions.
  • The operating envelope (wire temperature below ~1400 °C) provides a practical rule for selecting pulse duration and power to avoid actuator failure.
  • Perceived intensity is a linear function of electrical power, so amplitude control in applications can be done without complex nonlinear compensation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the measured force scales with pixel area, the same thermopneumatic approach could likely be scaled up or down to produce different force–displacement tradeoffs for other tactile applications, such as larger-area displays or smaller wearable arrays.
  • The low surface temperature rise (<4.6 °C) and thin, flexible construction suggest TPPs could be integrated into gloves or skin-conforming devices, though the current 2.8 mm thickness may need to be reduced for some wearables.
  • The speed of the actuator comes from heating the gas directly with a low-thermal-mass wire; using even thinner wires or lower-thermal-mass gases might push response times below the observed 5 ms.
  • A direct measurement of cavity pressure would confirm the thermopneumatic interpretation and convert the inferred air temperatures into measured quantities, strengthening the physical model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. Thermopneumatic pixels (TPPs) are presented as thin, flexible tactile actuators consisting of a sealed cavity with a suspended NiCr wire that is Joule-heated with ~10 V pulses; the resulting air pressure rise deflects a PDMS membrane. The paper reports direct isometric force and free-displacement measurements (up to 1.07 N and 0.96 mm), cyclic operation with peak-to-peak force from 332 mN at 10 Hz to 7 mN at 200 Hz, 54,000-cycle durability, low surface temperature rise (4.6 °C), and a driver board for forty TPPs. Two perceptual experiments show perceived intensity linear in power and 95.5% correct localization among four pixels. The abstract claims 'millisecond response times' and 'up to 300 Hz range'.

Significance. If the mechanism claim is supported, this is a significant contribution: a low-voltage, easy-to-fabricate actuator family for dense haptic arrays, with credible direct mechanical and durability measurements, explicit materials and cost, and perceptual validation. The main risks are that the thermopneumatic mechanism is inferred rather than directly measured, and that the dynamic-response claims exceed the reported data. The raw force, displacement, and durability results are valuable independently of the mechanism, but the paper's central novelty depends on the pressure mechanism being correctly identified and characterized.

major comments (2)
  1. [§III.A (Fig. 3A)] The inference P(t)=F(t)/A and T_air(t)=T0(F(t)/(P0A)+1) assumes a hermetically sealed ideal-gas cavity with no membrane tension, no leakage, and no compliance. No direct cavity-pressure measurement is reported. This assumption is load-bearing for the 'thermopneumatic' mechanism claim and for the quoted 97 °C air temperature; the 54,000-cycle test does not quantify internal pressure or rule out slow leakage. Please add a direct pressure measurement or an independent seal/membrane validation, or reframe the paper as an empirical actuator characterization rather than a validated thermopneumatic mechanism.
  2. [Abstract; §III.A; Fig. 4B] The abstract's 'millisecond response times' and 'up to 300 Hz range' are not supported by the reported data. In Fig. 3A, force and displacement reach their peaks only at the end of a 75 ms pulse, and the cooling time constant is τ=110 ms. No rise-time, latency, or bandwidth definition is given, so the '5–100 ms' statement in §II is ambiguous. The cyclic characterization extends only to 200 Hz (Fig. 4B), where Fpp is 7 mN. Please define and report a response-time metric (e.g., 10–90% rise time) and either provide data above 200 Hz or revise the claims.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Appendix C / Fig. 3E] The failure boundary is a parametric fit to the same failure data (Eq. 2), not an independent prediction. It should be labeled as a fit and, ideally, validated on held-out configurations.
  2. [§IV / Fig. 6] Perceptual results are reported with R² values only; N=10 with no confidence intervals or inferential tests. Please report per-participant variability and confidence intervals for the 95.5% localization rate and the intensity slope.
  3. [Fig. 4C] Only mean displacement is plotted over 54,000 cycles; adding variability (e.g., SD or CI) would strengthen the durability claim.
  4. [Appendix B] Wire temperature is based on 'linearly interpolating tabulated resistivity–temperature data'; NiCr resistivity vs. temperature is not linear over 20–1100 °C. Please specify the interpolation method, table source, and uncertainty.
  5. [Abstract / §II] The phrases 'millisecond response times' (abstract) and 'response times on the order of 5–100 ms' (§II) are inconsistent; define a single, quantitative response-time metric.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Force-derived air pressure/temperature are definitionally matched to force; mechanism evidence is partly tautological, but headline outputs are direct measurements.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Section III.A (Thermomechanical Characterization), equations for P(t) and T_air(t)]
    "From the measured force F(t), we computed the gauge air pressure P(t)=F(t)/A ... Air temperature was obtained using the ideal gas law, T_air(t)=T0(F(t)/(P0 A)+1) ... Temperature, pressure, force, and displacement exhibited closely matched temporal profiles"

    P and T_air are defined as linear transforms of the measured output force F, with no independent cavity-pressure measurement. The paper's causal narrative—'driving corresponding increases in cavity air temperature and pressure. The resulting membrane force F(t) produced a displacement'—and the 'closely matched temporal profiles' are therefore true by construction. The inferred gas state cannot independently validate the thermopneumatic mechanism; only the raw force/displacement data are non-circular.

full rationale

The headline performance claims (forces >1 N, displacements ~1 mm, 5–100 ms responses) are direct load-cell and laser-triangulation measurements, so the central empirical contribution does not reduce to a fit or to self-citation. The failure boundary in Fig. 3E is explicitly a parametric fit to observed failure points, so it is descriptive rather than a hidden prediction; Eq. (1) is a standard lumped thermal model with tau fitted to the cooling transient. Citations [19] and [20] are the authors' prior thermopneumatic work, but they are used only for qualitative consistency ('consistent with prior observations'), not to force the present result. The one genuine circularity is in the mechanism section: P(t)=F(t)/A and T_air(t)=T0(F(t)/(P0 A)+1) define the inferred gas state from the very force that the gas state is said to cause. The close temporal match between T_air, P, and F is therefore by construction. This weakens the thermopneumatic-mechanism evidence (no independent pressure/temperature measurement is reported) but does not affect the measured actuator output. Hence partial circularity, score 4.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The headline specs are direct measurements. The free parameters are fits to response curves and the operating envelope, while the axioms are standard thermal and ideal-gas assumptions plus the perceptual high-frequency-dominance assumption. No new physical entity is invented.

free parameters (6)
  • tau (thermal time constant) = 110 ms
    Fitted from the cooling transient using Eq. 1 (r^2 = 0.98). Used to characterize response dynamics but not to set the headline force/displacement numbers.
  • a (length-scaled thermal resistance) = 6601 mm K/W
    Fitted to the observed failure boundary in Fig. 3E via Eq. 2. Defines the claimed operating envelope, so the envelope is a descriptively fit boundary, not an independent prediction.
  • b (length-scaled thermal mass) = 6.51 uJ/(mm K)
    Second fit parameter for the failure envelope in Appendix C.
  • perceptual intensity slope alpha = 0.2677 W^-1
    Magnitude-estimation regression I = alpha P_el + beta (r^2 = 0.97). Maps electrical power to perceived intensity; no confidence intervals reported.
  • perceptual intensity intercept beta = -0.151
    Fit intercept in the same magnitude-estimation regression.
  • F_pp frequency slope alpha = -1.12
    Regression of log10(Fpp) on log10(f), Fig. 4B (r^2 > 0.99). Describes how peak-to-peak force drops with pulse rate.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Air in the cavity obeys the ideal gas law with uniform pressure under the membrane: T_air = T0(F/(P0 A) + 1).
    Section III.A infers air temperature from measured force via P = F/A and PV = nRT; no direct pressure sensor is used.
  • standard math First-order lumped thermal model for the wire (Eq. 1) with constant R_thermal and C.
    Used throughout for wire temperature and the failure envelope; assumes uniform wire temperature and neglects radiation and position-dependent losses.
  • domain assumption NiCr resistivity-temperature table and 1400 C melting temperature from the cited datasheet are accurate for the 48 AWG wire.
    Appendix B/C: wire temperature traces and the failure criterion rely entirely on this tabulated data.
  • domain assumption Measured isometric load-cell force equals pressure force P*A with no membrane tension or edge contribution.
    Section III.A defines gauge pressure as F(t)/A; membrane mechanics are not modeled.
  • domain assumption Tactile perception is dominated by the transient high-frequency force component F_pp rather than the slow offset F_0.
    Section III.B justifies focusing on peak-to-peak force under cyclic stimulation, citing [22].

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 9008 in / 13836 out tokens · 149372 ms · 2026-08-02T17:59:06.485261+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present thermopneumatic pixels (TPPs) -- low-profile pixels and arrays that generate dynamic tactile feedback. These devices are thin, fast, reconfigurable, and output localized transient displacements at each pixel. Their parsimonious design -- a layered architecture without internal moving parts -- and low-voltage ($\lesssim$10 V) operation may facilitate practical integration in a wide variety of interfaces. Each TPP converts brief electrical pulses into transient air pressure increases in an internal cavity, yielding out-of-plane forces and displacements for tactile feedback. We demonstrate TPPs that output displacements of 1 mm and forces exceeding 1 N, with millisecond response times, in packages that are less than 3 mm thick. Force and displacement increase with pixel surface area, facilitating tailorability. The pixels can also generate oscillating feedback at pulse rates up to 300 Hz range. We report designs for compact arrays of pixels at 4 mm spacing, and simple pulse driving architectures using miniature transistors driven by microcontrollers. We characterize the mechanical, dynamic, and thermal response of TPPs, and their robustness and consistency over tens of thousands of cycles. We report perceptual experiments on spatial localization and intensity as a function of driving power. Together, these results establish thermopneumatic pixels as a compact, adaptable tactile technology that blends performance and practicality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.16750 by Max Linnander, Yon Visell.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A) Operating principle for thermopneumatic pixels (TPPs). TPPs deliver heat to air encapsulated within a small sealed cavity, driving gas expansion that [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A) Electronic driver board interfacing with up to ten modules, enabling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Thermomechanical characterization of TPPs. A) NiCr wire temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Characterization of TPPs under cyclic operation. A) Isometric force [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A) Surface temperature measurements of TPPs. (b) Max temperatures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Perceptual Evaluation. A) Experiment 1: Perceived intensity as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Dynamic feedback in wave-mediated surface haptics: A modular platform,

    D. Goetz, G. Reardon, M. Linnander, and Y . Visell, “Dynamic feedback in wave-mediated surface haptics: A modular platform,” in2023 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC). IEEE, 2023, pp. 107–113. 7

    2023

  2. [2]

    Skinsource: A data-driven toolbox for predicting touch-elicited vibra- tions in the upper limb,

    N. Tummala, G. Reardon, S. Fani, D. Goetz, M. Bianchi, and Y . Visell, “Skinsource: A data-driven toolbox for predicting touch-elicited vibra- tions in the upper limb,” in2024 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS), 2024, pp. 53–60

    2024

  3. [3]

    Vibraforge: A scalable prototyping toolkit for creating spatialized vibrotactile feedback systems,

    B. Huang, S. Ren, Y . Luo, Q. Cheng, H. Cai, Y . Sang, M. Sousa, P. H. Dietz, and D. Wigdor, “Vibraforge: A scalable prototyping toolkit for creating spatialized vibrotactile feedback systems,” inProceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ser. CHI ’25. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2025

    2025

  4. [4]

    Open-source hardware and software platform for vibrotactile motion guidance,

    N. Rokhmanova, J. Martus, R. Faulkner, J. Fiene, and K. J. Kuchen- becker, “Open-source hardware and software platform for vibrotactile motion guidance,”Device, p. 100966, Oct. 2025

    2025

  5. [5]

    Jones and S

    L. Jones and S. Lederman,Human hand function. Oxford University Press, 2006

    2006

  6. [6]

    Identification of the optimum resolution specification for a haptic graphic display,

    D. Copeland and J. Finlay, “Identification of the optimum resolution specification for a haptic graphic display,”Interacting with Computers, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 98–106, 2010

    2010

  7. [7]

    Vibrotactile masking and the persistence of tactual features,

    J. C. Craig and P. M. Evans, “Vibrotactile masking and the persistence of tactual features,”Perception and psychophysics, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 309–317, 1987

    1987

  8. [8]

    Pulse-driven magnetostatic micro-actuator array based on ultrasoft elastomeric mem- branes for active surface applications,

    J. Streque, A. Talbi, P. Pernod, and V . Preobrazhensky, “Pulse-driven magnetostatic micro-actuator array based on ultrasoft elastomeric mem- branes for active surface applications,”Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, vol. 22, no. 9, p. 095020, aug 2012

    2012

  9. [9]

    Hydraulically amplified electrostatic taxels (haxels) for full body haptics,

    E. Leroy and H. Shea, “Hydraulically amplified electrostatic taxels (haxels) for full body haptics,”Advanced Materials Technologies, vol. 8, no. 16, p. 2300242, 2023

    2023

  10. [10]

    Fully 3d-printed, stretchable, and conformable haptic interfaces,

    G. Grasso, S. Rosset, and H. Shea, “Fully 3d-printed, stretchable, and conformable haptic interfaces,”Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 33, no. 20, p. 2213821, 2023

    2023

  11. [11]

    A pocket-sized ten- channel high voltage power supply for soft electrostatic actuators,

    S. K. Mitchell, T. Martin, and C. Keplinger, “A pocket-sized ten- channel high voltage power supply for soft electrostatic actuators,” Advanced Materials Technologies, vol. 7, no. 8, p. 2101469, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10. 1002/admt.202101469

    2022

  12. [12]

    Emerging material technologies for haptics,

    S. Biswas and Y . Visell, “Emerging material technologies for haptics,” Advanced Materials Technologies, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 1900042, 2019

    2019

  13. [13]

    Flat panel haptics: Embedded electroosmotic pumps for scalable shape displays,

    C. Shultz and C. Harrison, “Flat panel haptics: Embedded electroosmotic pumps for scalable shape displays,” inProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ser. CHI ’23. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023

    2023

  14. [14]

    Fluid reality: High-resolution, untethered haptic gloves using electroosmotic pump arrays,

    V . Shen, T. Rae-Grant, J. Mullenbach, C. Harrison, and C. Shultz, “Fluid reality: High-resolution, untethered haptic gloves using electroosmotic pump arrays,” inProceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ser. UIST ’23. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023

    2023

  15. [15]

    Batch fabrication of optical actuators using nanotube–elastomer composites towards refreshable braille displays,

    C. J. Camargo, H. Campanella, J. E. Marshall, N. Torras, K. Zinoviev, E. M. Terentjev, and J. Esteve, “Batch fabrication of optical actuators using nanotube–elastomer composites towards refreshable braille displays,”Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, vol. 22, no. 7, p. 075009, jun 2012. [Online]. Available: https: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/0960-13...

    work page doi:10.1088/0960-1317/22/7/075009 2012

  16. [16]

    Laser pouch motors: Selective and wireless activation of soft actuators by laser-powered liquid-to-gas phase change,

    T. Hiraki, K. Nakahara, K. Narumi, R. Niiyama, N. Kida, N. Takamura, H. Okamoto, and Y . Kawahara, “Laser pouch motors: Selective and wireless activation of soft actuators by laser-powered liquid-to-gas phase change,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 4180– 4187, 2020

    2020

  17. [17]

    Ultrathin conformable electronic tattoo for tactile sensations,

    A. Mazzotta and V . Mattoli, “Ultrathin conformable electronic tattoo for tactile sensations,”Advanced Electronic Materials, vol. 9, no. 9, p. 2201327, 2023

    2023

  18. [18]

    Low-voltage wearable tactile display with thermo-pneumatic actuation,

    A. Mazzotta, S. Taccola, I. Cesiniet al., “Low-voltage wearable tactile display with thermo-pneumatic actuation,”npj Flexible Electronics, vol. 9, no. 70, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41528-025-00426-3

    2025

  19. [19]

    Tactile displays driven by projected light,

    M. Linnander, D. Goetz, G. Reardon, V . Kumar, E. Hawkes, and Y . Visell, “Tactile displays driven by projected light,”Science Robotics, vol. 10, no. 107, p. eadv1383, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/scirobotics.adv1383

    doi:10.1126/scirobotics.adv1383 2025

  20. [20]

    Haptic light-emitting diodes: Miniature, luminous tactile actuators,

    M. Linnander and Y . Visell, “Haptic light-emitting diodes: Miniature, luminous tactile actuators,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.11043, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11043

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    80/20 ni cr resistance wire: Technical datasheet aws 180 rev.1,

    Alloy Wire International Ltd., “80/20 ni cr resistance wire: Technical datasheet aws 180 rev.1,” Alloy Wire International Ltd., Brierley Hill, West Midlands, UK, Technical Datasheet AWS 180 Rev.1, 2016, avail- able at: https://www.alloywire.com

    2016

  22. [22]

    Thresholds for the perception of hand- transmitted vibration: dependence on contact area and contact location,

    M. Morioka and M. J. Griffin, “Thresholds for the perception of hand- transmitted vibration: dependence on contact area and contact location,” Somatosensory and Motor Research, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 281–297, 2005

    2005

  23. [23]

    High-temperature stability of nichrome in reactive environments,

    J. Zhou, T. R. Ohno, and C. A. Wolden, “High-temperature stability of nichrome in reactive environments,”Journal of V acuum Science and Technology A, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 756–761, 04 2003. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1116/1.1570834

    work page doi:10.1116/1.1570834 2003

  24. [24]

    Effect of prior stimulation on vibrotactile thresholds,

    R. T. Verrillo and G. A. Gescheider, “Effect of prior stimulation on vibrotactile thresholds,”Sensory Processes, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 292–300, 1977

    1977

  25. [25]

    Application of psychophysical techniques to haptic research,

    L. A. Jones and H. Z. Tan, “Application of psychophysical techniques to haptic research,”IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 268–284, 2013

    2013

  26. [26]

    Problems and methods of psychophysics

    S. S. Stevens, “Problems and methods of psychophysics.”Psychological bulletin, vol. 55, no. 4, p. 177, 1958

    1958