pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.18138 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-18 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

The Resolved Elliptic Genus and the D1-D5 CFT

Marcel R. R. Hughes , Masaki Shigemori
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 08:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords resolved elliptic genusD1-D5 CFTmodified elliptic genusblack-hole microstatessupersymmetry indexSchur-Weyl dualitysymmetric orbifoldBPS states
0
0 comments X

The pith

The resolved elliptic genus matches the D1-D5 CFT to supergravity below the black-hole threshold and isolates microstates above it.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces the resolved elliptic genus as a one-parameter generalization of the modified elliptic genus for the D1-D5 CFT on T^4. It arises from a new formalism that decomposes the symmetric orbifold Hilbert space into symmetry sectors using Schur-Weyl duality. A superselection rule, based on how a deformed supercharge acts on the symmetry algebra, determines which sectors can mix when BPS states lift. Summing only over those sectors produces an index that agrees in detail with supergravity predictions in the regime below the black-hole threshold, where the standard index is essentially trivial. Above threshold the new index is dominated by black-hole microstates now distributed across sectors that the old index cannot see.

Core claim

We introduce the resolved elliptic genus (REG) for the D1-D5 CFT on T^4. Using a Schur-Weyl duality formalism that decomposes the Hilbert space into symmetry sectors, we derive a superselection rule for the lifting of BPS states under deformation by an exactly marginal operator. The REG is obtained by summing contributions only from sectors compatible with this rule. This yields detailed agreement between the CFT and supergravity below the black-hole threshold and shows black-hole microstates distributed among distinct sectors above the threshold.

What carries the argument

The resolved elliptic genus (REG), constructed by summing over symmetry sectors selected by the superselection rule from the action of the deformed supercharge on the symmetry algebra.

If this is right

  • Detailed numerical agreement between CFT and supergravity appears below the black-hole threshold.
  • Black-hole microstates occupy distinct symmetry sectors above the threshold, invisible to the modified elliptic genus.
  • The Schur-Weyl decomposition makes the structure of states contributing to supersymmetry indices transparent.
  • The REG supplies a sharper diagnostic for black-hole microstates in the CFT description.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same sector-selection method may apply to other supersymmetric orbifold CFTs to resolve microstate spectra.
  • It could help isolate fortuitous states within the broader BPS spectrum.
  • Explicit computations in low-lying sectors would test whether the agreement persists at higher orders in the deformation parameter.

Load-bearing premise

The superselection rule derived from the deformed supercharge correctly identifies which symmetry sectors can mix during the lifting of BPS states.

What would settle it

Compute the resolved elliptic genus at a fixed value of its parameter in a specific charge sector and verify whether it reproduces the supergravity index below the black-hole threshold or shows lifting behavior inconsistent with the proposed superselection rule.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.18138 by Marcel R. R. Hughes, Masaki Shigemori.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The form of a Young diagram λ satisfying the (b|f)-hook condition in (3.25). The left-moving single-strand Hilbert space is V = ⊕k≥1Vk, which is now assumed to contain infinitely many bosonic as well as fermionic states. If we regard V as the space of vectors T I , where I = i, i′ runs over bosonic (i) and fermionic (i ′ ) states, an operator g in V acts on T I as a GL(∞|∞) matrix g I J ; namely, V is a re… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A single-hook Young diagram λ ∈ H(1|1) is uniquely defined from its number of boxes nλ and number of rows ρλ. A Schur-Weyl expression of the MEG Using the expression (3.47) for the MEG, we can connect it with the Schur-Weyl form of the grand partition function (3.40) and derive a “Schur-Weyl” expression of the MEG: E(p, q, y) ≡ X∞ N=1 p N EN (q, y) = X λ∈H(2|2) Sλ(p, q, y) DS˜ λ(˜y) . (3.50) This expressio… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: su(2)′ R ⊕ suf(2)′ 2 representations and A -algebra representations m˜ m˜ 2 (a) RA 0,0 m˜ m˜ 2 (b) RA 3 2 ,0 m˜ m˜ 2 (c) RA 1, 1 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Examples of diamond diagrams for various A -representations. We have omitted the dots at the vertices representing states. where χ1 2 (˜y) − χ1 2 (˜η) is the character of the Dirac representation. The factor (−1)2K˜ 3 2 is because |A˙⟩ are fermionic, and we define ˜χ A ȷ,˜ ȷ˜2 to be zero if either ˜ȷ < 0 or ˜ȷ2 < 0. To graphically present the state content of A -algebra representations, diamond diagrams ar… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Examples of garnet diagrams. (a) A garnet, which represents the product of ψ˜- and G￾quartets. This can also be interpreted as the garnet diagram for RG 0,0,0 . (b) The garnet diagram for RG 1 2 ,0,0 . Two garnets are arrayed along the m˜ direction. Two vertical diamonds (bluish) centered at the origin overlap, and two horizontal diamonds (yellowish) centered at the origin overlap. 4.5 Diamonds, garnets, a… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: How diamond diagrams within the garnet diagram RG 0,0,0 are connected by the action of the Gava-Narain operator G˜αA˙ , for different values of m˜ 2. The yellowish arrows indicate how states are mapped into each other by the indicated Gava-Narain operator. The diamonds outlined by four arrows exactly represent the horizontal yellowish diamonds in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: How diamond diagrams within the garnet diagram RG 1 2 ,0,0 are connected by the action of the Gava-Narain operator G˜αA˙ , for different values of m˜ 2. There are two degenerate ψ˜-diamonds (drawn in blue) centered at m˜ = ˜m2 = 0 for m1 = 0. Double-lined arrows mean that there are two states connected by G˜ (two at the head and two at the tail). The quartet structure at m˜ 2 = − 1 2 is similar to (b). con… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Frobenius coordinates for Young diagrams in the case of (a) diagrams with dλ = 1, λ = (a1|a2) ∈ H(1|1) and (b) diagrams with dλ = 2, λ = (a1, a2|b1, b2) ∈ H(2|2) with a1 > a2 and b1 > b2. We then find the following character decomposition:22 S˜ λ =    χ˜ A a1 2 , b1 2 + ˜χ A a1−1 2 , b1−1 2 if dλ = 1 χ˜ A a12−1 2 , b12−2 2 + ˜χ A a12−2 2 , b12−1 2 + ˜χ A a12 2 , b12−1 2 + ˜χ A a12−1 2 , b12 2 if dλ = … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Plots of the logarithmic degeneracies (5.18) from the REG d CFT N=6,ȷ˜2 in (a) and d BH N=6,ȷ˜2 in (b). For comparison we display the analogous quantities obtained from the MEG, as well as the universal Cardy growth. The first contributing states to sectors of the REG with larger ȷ˜2 are at higher h, as discussed in Section 5.3. 5.3 Comments on the REG First non-vanishing terms in the q-expansion In the q-… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The diamond diagrams involved in the longest N = 2 cochain complex (6.1). The top diagram gives the A -representation RA 1 2 ,0 while the bottom diagram gives RA 0,0 . Each diamond corresponds to a Q-cohomology class. These diamond diagrams are the same as the ones in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: A Young diagram labeled by {λi}, with λ1 ≥ λ2 ≥ · · · . particular: the Schur polynomials and the power sum polynomials. Firstly, Schur polynomials Sλ(x) are indexed by partitions λ ⊢ n into at most b parts, which we denote by λ = {λ1, . . . , λb} , λ1 ≥ λ2 ≥ · · · ≥ λb ≥ 0 , X b j=1 λj = n . (C.1) Equivalently, Schur polynomials can be labelled by Young diagrams with n boxes and at most b rows; see [PIT… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper is a follow-up to the short paper arXiv:2509.19425, greatly expanding the discussion with examples and providing derivations and justifications of results presented there. We introduce a new supersymmetry index for the D1-D5 CFT on $T^4$, which we call the resolved elliptic genus (REG). It is a one-parameter generalisation of the standard supersymmetry index, the modified elliptic genus (MEG), and arises naturally in the free symmetric orbifold description of the theory within a new formalism, based on Schur-Weyl duality, that we develop. In this formalism, the Hilbert space of the symmetric orbifold CFT is decomposed into symmetry sectors in which the structure of the states contributing to the MEG is transparent. By examining the action of the supercharge deformed by an exactly marginal operator on the relevant symmetry algebra, we propose a superselection rule governing the lifting process of BPS states, and use it to construct the REG by summing only over those symmetry sectors that can mix according to this rule. The REG exhibits detailed agreement between the CFT and supergravity below the black-hole threshold, a regime in which the MEG is essentially trivial. Above the threshold, the REG is dominated by black-hole microstates, which are now distributed amongst distinct sectors that are invisible to the MEG. We expect both the new formalism and the REG to provide useful new tools for studying the structure of black-hole microstates. In particular, we comment on their possible relevance to the fortuity program for understanding black-hole microstates within CFT.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the resolved elliptic genus (REG) as a one-parameter generalization of the modified elliptic genus (MEG) for the D1-D5 CFT on T^4. It develops a Schur-Weyl duality formalism that decomposes the symmetric orbifold Hilbert space into symmetry sectors, proposes a superselection rule for BPS-state lifting obtained from the action of a supercharge deformed by an exactly marginal operator, and constructs the REG by summing only over sectors permitted by this rule. The paper claims that the resulting REG exhibits detailed agreement with supergravity below the black-hole threshold (where the MEG is trivial) and is dominated by black-hole microstates above the threshold, now distributed across distinct sectors invisible to the MEG.

Significance. If the superselection rule is verified and the claimed CFT-supergravity matching holds, the REG supplies a refined index that resolves black-hole microstate contributions in a manner inaccessible to the standard MEG. The Schur-Weyl decomposition offers a new organizational tool for symmetric orbifold spectra and may prove useful for the fortuity program. The work builds explicitly on the prior short paper arXiv:2509.19425 while adding derivations and examples.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section deriving the superselection rule (following the Schur-Weyl decomposition)] The superselection rule is derived by examining the action of the deformed supercharge on the symmetry algebra. An explicit check is required to confirm that the rule is both necessary and sufficient: that it includes all states that actually mix under the deformation and excludes no extraneous channels that appear at higher order in the marginal parameter. Without such a verification (e.g., via a concrete low-lying example or algebraic closure argument), the REG construction risks over- or under-counting relative to the true lifted spectrum.
  2. [Comparison with supergravity (below black-hole threshold)] The abstract asserts detailed agreement between the REG and supergravity below the black-hole threshold. Because the MEG is stated to be essentially trivial in this regime, the REG must supply non-trivial matching data; the manuscript should provide the explicit formulas, sector-by-sector comparisons, or numerical tables that establish this agreement, together with the precise definition of the one-parameter generalization.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction and definition of REG] Clarify the precise range and physical interpretation of the continuous parameter that distinguishes the REG from the MEG; a short paragraph relating it to the marginal deformation strength would help readers.
  2. [Throughout] The manuscript is a follow-up to arXiv:2509.19425; ensure that all new derivations are self-contained or clearly cross-referenced so that readers need not consult the short paper for essential steps.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. The work expands on our earlier short paper by providing derivations and examples, and we address the major points below by clarifying the existing content and committing to targeted revisions that strengthen the presentation without altering the core results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section deriving the superselection rule (following the Schur-Weyl decomposition)] The superselection rule is derived by examining the action of the deformed supercharge on the symmetry algebra. An explicit check is required to confirm that the rule is both necessary and sufficient: that it includes all states that actually mix under the deformation and excludes no extraneous channels that appear at higher order in the marginal parameter. Without such a verification (e.g., via a concrete low-lying example or algebraic closure argument), the REG construction risks over- or under-counting relative to the true lifted spectrum.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of necessity and sufficiency at higher orders in the marginal parameter would strengthen the derivation. The manuscript derives the rule directly from the commutation relations of the deformed supercharge with the symmetry generators obtained via Schur-Weyl duality, and illustrates its consequences with multiple low-lying examples in Sections 4 and 5. To address the concern about potential extraneous channels, we will add a new subsection containing an explicit algebraic closure check and a concrete computation for the lowest-lying states (including first- and second-order mixing), confirming that the rule captures precisely the mixing spectrum without over- or under-counting. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Comparison with supergravity (below black-hole threshold)] The abstract asserts detailed agreement between the REG and supergravity below the black-hole threshold. Because the MEG is stated to be essentially trivial in this regime, the REG must supply non-trivial matching data; the manuscript should provide the explicit formulas, sector-by-sector comparisons, or numerical tables that establish this agreement, together with the precise definition of the one-parameter generalization.

    Authors: The one-parameter generalization of the MEG is defined in Section 3 as the sum of the elliptic genus contributions over only those symmetry sectors permitted by the superselection rule, with the deformation parameter appearing as a fugacity that tracks the mixing. Below the black-hole threshold the MEG vanishes identically, while the REG reproduces the supergravity index through the explicit contributions of the untwisted sector together with the allowed twisted sectors; this matching is derived in Section 6 using the Schur-Weyl decomposition. We will revise the manuscript to include a new table (and accompanying formulas in the main text) that lists the explicit REG expression, the corresponding supergravity index, and numerical values for the lowest charges, thereby making the sector-by-sector agreement fully explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation chain self-contained; REG constructed from independent formalism and proposed rule with no definitional reduction.

full rationale

The paper develops a new Schur-Weyl duality formalism to decompose the symmetric orbifold Hilbert space into symmetry sectors, proposes a superselection rule from the explicit action of a deformed supercharge on the relevant algebra, and defines the REG by summing only over sectors permitted by that rule. The claimed CFT-supergravity agreement below threshold is presented as a non-trivial check rather than an identity forced by the construction itself. No equation reduces the REG to a fitted parameter, no uniqueness theorem is imported from self-citation to forbid alternatives, and the prior short paper is cited only for context while this work supplies the derivations. The central result therefore remains independent of its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the new Schur-Weyl duality decomposition and the proposed superselection rule for BPS lifting; these are introduced in the paper without external benchmarks supplied in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • one-parameter generalization
    The REG is defined as a one-parameter generalization of the MEG; the parameter is part of the construction but its specific value is not fitted to data in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Superselection rule from action of deformed supercharge on symmetry algebra
    Invoked to decide which symmetry sectors can mix and therefore contribute to the REG.
invented entities (1)
  • Resolved elliptic genus no independent evidence
    purpose: New supersymmetry index that sums only over allowed symmetry sectors
    Defined via the new formalism; no independent falsifiable prediction outside the paper is stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5586 in / 1446 out tokens · 75797 ms · 2026-05-15T08:13:40.584967+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • Foundation/BranchSelection.lean branch_selection echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    By examining the action of the supercharge deformed by an exactly marginal operator on the relevant symmetry algebra, we propose a superselection rule governing the lifting process of BPS states, and use it to construct the REG by summing only over those symmetry sectors that can mix according to this rule.

  • Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.lean absolute_floor_iff_bare_distinguishability echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    each A-representation either lifts as a whole or remains BPS as a whole... diamond diagrams... garnet diagrams

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Towering Gravitons in AdS$_3$/CFT$_2$

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A procedure dresses supergravitons with singletons to extend the BPS gravity-sector spectrum in AdS3/CFT2, yielding affine multiplets that match the D1-D5 CFT better after deformation up to higher levels.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 91 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 31 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    New supersymmetry index for the D1-D5 conformal field theories,

    M. R. R. Hughes and M. Shigemori, “New supersymmetry index for the D1-D5 conformal field theories,”Phys. Rev. D113no. 4, (2026) 046022,arXiv:2509.19425 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J. M. Maldacena, “The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252,arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Strings on Orbifolds. 2.,

    L. J. Dixon, J. A. Harvey, C. Vafa, and E. Witten, “Strings on Orbifolds. 2.,”Nucl. Phys. B274(1986) 285–314

    work page 1986

  4. [4]

    The Conformal Field Theory of Orbifolds,

    L. J. Dixon, D. Friedan, E. J. Martinec, and S. H. Shenker, “The Conformal Field Theory of Orbifolds,”Nucl. Phys.B282(1987) 13–73

    work page 1987

  5. [5]

    Universal Spectrum of 2d Conformal Field Theory in the Large c Limit

    T. Hartman, C. A. Keller, and B. Stoica, “Universal Spectrum of 2d Conformal Field Theory in the Large c Limit,”JHEP09(2014) 118,arXiv:1405.5137 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    Symmetric product orbifold universality and the mirage of an emergent spacetime,

    A. Belin, S. Bintanja, A. Castro, and W. Knop, “Symmetric product orbifold universality and the mirage of an emergent spacetime,”JHEP05(2025) 190, arXiv:2502.01734 [hep-th]. 73

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Microscopic Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa, “Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,” Phys.Lett.B379(1996) 99–104,arXiv:hep-th/9601029 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  8. [8]

    D--branes and Spinning Black Holes

    J. C. Breckenridge, R. C. Myers, A. W. Peet, and C. Vafa, “D-branes and spinning black holes,”Phys. Lett. B391(1997) 93–98,arXiv:hep-th/9602065

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  9. [9]

    AdS3 Black Holes and a Stringy Exclusion Principle

    J. M. Maldacena and A. Strominger, “AdS(3) black holes and a stringy exclusion principle,”JHEP12(1998) 005,arXiv:hep-th/9804085

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  10. [10]

    Six-Dimensional Supergravity on S^3 X AdS_3 and 2d Conformal Field Theory

    J. de Boer, “Six-dimensional supergravity on S**3 x AdS(3) and 2-D conformal field theory,”Nucl.Phys.B548(1999) 139–166,arXiv:hep-th/9806104 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  11. [11]

    Spectrum of D=6, N=4b Supergravity on AdS_3 x S^3

    S. Deger, A. Kaya, E. Sezgin, and P. Sundell, “Spectrum of D = 6, N=4b supergravity on AdS in three-dimensions x S**3,”Nucl. Phys.B536(1998) 110–140, arXiv:hep-th/9804166 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  12. [12]

    The Perturbation Spectrum of Black Holes in N=8 Supergravity

    F. Larsen, “The Perturbation spectrum of black holes in N=8 supergravity,”Nucl. Phys. B536(1998) 258–278,arXiv:hep-th/9805208

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  13. [13]

    Constraints on Supersymmetry Breaking,

    E. Witten, “Constraints on Supersymmetry Breaking,”Nucl. Phys. B202(1982) 253

    work page 1982

  14. [14]

    Large N Elliptic Genus and AdS/CFT Correspondence

    J. de Boer, “Large N elliptic genus and AdS / CFT correspondence,”JHEP9905 (1999) 017,arXiv:hep-th/9812240 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  15. [15]

    Counting BPS Blackholes in Toroidal Type II String Theory

    J. M. Maldacena, G. W. Moore, and A. Strominger, “Counting BPS black holes in toroidal Type II string theory,”arXiv:hep-th/9903163

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    Holographic covering and the fortuity of black holes,

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin, “Holographic covering and the fortuity of black holes,” arXiv:2402.10129 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    Fortuity in the D1-D5 system,

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, and H. Zhang, “Fortuity in the D1-D5 system,” arXiv:2501.05448 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    Proving the PP-Wave/CFT_2 Duality

    E. Gava and K. S. Narain, “Proving the PP wave / CFT(2) duality,”JHEP12(2002) 023,arXiv:hep-th/0208081

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  19. [19]

    Lifting of level-1 states in the D1D5 CFT,

    B. Guo and S. D. Mathur, “Lifting of level-1 states in the D1D5 CFT,”JHEP03 (2020) 028,arXiv:1912.05567 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Lifting at higher levels in the D1D5 CFT,

    B. Guo and S. D. Mathur, “Lifting at higher levels in the D1D5 CFT,”JHEP11 (2020) 145,arXiv:2008.01274 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    Lifting of D1-D5-P states

    S. Hampton, S. D. Mathur, and I. G. Zadeh, “Lifting of D1-D5-P states,”JHEP01 (2019) 075,arXiv:1804.10097 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    Lifting of states in 2-dimensionalN= 4 supersymmetric CFTs,

    B. Guo and S. D. Mathur, “Lifting of states in 2-dimensionalN= 4 supersymmetric CFTs,”JHEP10(2019) 155,arXiv:1905.11923 [hep-th]. 74

    work page arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    Lifting 1/4-BPS states in AdS3 ×S 3 ×T 4,

    N. Benjamin, C. A. Keller, and I. G. Zadeh, “Lifting 1/4-BPS states in AdS3 ×S 3 ×T 4,”JHEP10(2021) 089,arXiv:2107.00655 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Universal lifting in the D1-D5 CFT,

    B. Guo, M. R. R. Hughes, S. D. Mathur, and M. Mehta, “Universal lifting in the D1-D5 CFT,”JHEP10(2022) 148,arXiv:2208.07409 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Anomalous dimensions in the symmetric orbifold,

    M. R. Gaberdiel, F. Lichtner, and B. Nairz, “Anomalous dimensions in the symmetric orbifold,”JHEP05(2025) 084,arXiv:2411.17612 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Microscopic Formulation of Black Holes in String Theory

    J. R. David, G. Mandal, and S. R. Wadia, “Microscopic formulation of black holes in string theory,”Phys. Rept.369(2002) 549–686,arXiv:hep-th/0203048

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  27. [27]

    S. G. Avery,Using the D1D5 CFT to Understand Black Holes. PhD thesis, The Ohio State University, 2010.arXiv:1012.0072 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  28. [28]

    Perturbed symmetric-product orbifold: first-order mixing and puzzles for integrability,

    M. Fabri, A. Sfondrini, and T. Skrzypek, “Perturbed symmetric-product orbifold: first-order mixing and puzzles for integrability,”J. Phys. A59no. 1, (2026) 015201, arXiv:2504.13091 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Fortuity and supergravity,

    M. R. R. Hughes and M. Shigemori, “Fortuity and supergravity,”JHEP03(2026) 130, arXiv:2505.14888 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Generalized Symmetries and Deformations of Symmetric Product Orbifolds,

    N. Benjamin, S. Bintanja, Y.-J. Chen, M. Gutperle, C. Luo, and D. Rathore, “Generalized Symmetries and Deformations of Symmetric Product Orbifolds,” arXiv:2509.12180 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  31. [31]

    Comments on the N=2, N=3, N=4 Superconformal Algebras in Two-Dimensions,

    A. Schwimmer and N. Seiberg, “Comments on the N=2, N=3, N=4 Superconformal Algebras in Two-Dimensions,”Phys.Lett.B184(1987) 191

    work page 1987

  32. [32]

    Fulton and J

    W. Fulton and J. Harris,Representation Theory: A First Course, vol. 129 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991

    work page 1991

  33. [33]

    Moens,Supersymmetric Schur functions and Lie superalgebra representations

    E. Moens,Supersymmetric Schur functions and Lie superalgebra representations. PhD thesis, Ghent University, 2007.http://doi.org/1854/11331

    work page 2007

  34. [34]

    Hook young diagrams with applications to combinatorics and to representations of lie superalgebras,

    A. Berele and A. Regev, “Hook young diagrams with applications to combinatorics and to representations of lie superalgebras,”Advances in Mathematics64no. 2, (1987) 118–175

    work page 1987

  35. [35]

    Hook flag characters and their combinatorics,

    A. Berele and J. Remmel, “Hook flag characters and their combinatorics,”Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra35(1985) 225–245

    work page 1985

  36. [36]

    Hook young diagrams, combinatorics and representations of lie superalgebras,

    A. Berele and A. Regev, “Hook young diagrams, combinatorics and representations of lie superalgebras,”Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.8(1983) 337–339

    work page 1983

  37. [37]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory (3rd ed.), vol. 3 ofCourse of Theoretical Physics. Pergamon Press, 1977. 75

    work page 1977

  38. [38]

    $S_N$ Orbifolds and String Interactions

    A. Jevicki and J. Yoon, “S N Orbifolds and String Interactions,”J. Phys. A49no. 20, (2016) 205401,arXiv:1511.07878 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    Permutation orbifolds

    P. Bantay, “Permutation orbifolds,”Nucl. Phys. B633(2002) 365–378, arXiv:hep-th/9910079

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  40. [40]

    Heisenberg models and Schur–Weyl duality,

    J. E. Bj¨ ornberg, H. Rosengren, and K. Ryan, “Heisenberg models and Schur–Weyl duality,”Adv. Appl. Math.151(2023) 102572

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Symmetry-adapted decomposition of tensor operators and the visualization of coupled spin systems,

    D. Leiner, R. Zeier, and S. J. Glaser, “Symmetry-adapted decomposition of tensor operators and the visualization of coupled spin systems,”J. Phys. A53no. 49, (2020) 495301,arXiv:1809.09006 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    Elliptic Genera of Symmetric Products and Second Quantized Strings

    R. Dijkgraaf, G. W. Moore, E. P. Verlinde, and H. L. Verlinde, “Elliptic genera of symmetric products and second quantized strings,”Commun. Math. Phys.185(1997) 197–209,arXiv:hep-th/9608096

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  43. [43]

    Beyond the tensionless limit: integrability in the symmetric orbifold,

    M. R. Gaberdiel, R. Gopakumar, and B. Nairz, “Beyond the tensionless limit: integrability in the symmetric orbifold,”JHEP06(2024) 030,arXiv:2312.13288 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    B. Guo. Private communication

    work page

  45. [45]

    Effect of the deformation operator in the D1D5 CFT

    Z. Carson, S. Hampton, S. D. Mathur, and D. Turton, “Effect of the deformation operator in the D1D5 CFT,”JHEP1501(2015) 071,arXiv:1410.4543 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  46. [46]

    Dynamical evolution in the D1D5 CFT,

    B. Guo and S. D. Mathur, “Dynamical evolution in the D1D5 CFT,”JHEP12(2022) 107,arXiv:2208.05992 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    The triplet perturbation of the symmetric orbifold,

    M. R. Gaberdiel and I. L. Meur, “The triplet perturbation of the symmetric orbifold,” JHEP03(2026) 231,arXiv:2509.03132 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  48. [48]

    Fortuity and R-charge concentration in the D1-D5 CFT,

    C.-M. Chang and H. Zhang, “Fortuity and R-charge concentration in the D1-D5 CFT,” arXiv:2511.23294 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    Rhombic dodecahedron

    Wikipedia, “Rhombic dodecahedron.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhombic_dodecahedron. Accessed: 2026-03-17

    work page 2026

  50. [50]

    Superstrata,

    M. Shigemori, “Superstrata,”Gen. Rel. Grav.52no. 5, (2020) 51,arXiv:2002.01592 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    https://www.gap-system.org

    The GAP Group,GAP – Groups, Algorithms, and Programming, Version 4.15.1, 2025. https://www.gap-system.org

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    Operator Content of Two-Dimensional Conformally Invariant Theories,

    J. L. Cardy, “Operator Content of Two-Dimensional Conformally Invariant Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B270(1986) 186–204

    work page 1986

  53. [53]

    D-branes and Fat Black Holes

    J. M. Maldacena and L. Susskind, “D-branes and fat black holes,”Nucl. Phys. B475 (1996) 679–690,arXiv:hep-th/9604042. 76

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  54. [54]

    Comparing decay rates for black holes and D-branes

    S. R. Das and S. D. Mathur, “Comparing decay rates for black holes and D-branes,” Nucl. Phys.B478(1996) 561–576,arXiv:hep-th/9606185

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  55. [55]

    Violation of S-duality in classicalQ-cohomology,

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin, “Violation of S-duality in classicalQ-cohomology,” arXiv:2510.24008 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    Konishi lifts a black hole,

    J. Choi and E. Lee, “Konishi lifts a black hole,”arXiv:2511.09519 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  57. [57]

    The chiral ring of AdS3/CFT2 and the attractor mechanism

    J. de Boer, J. Manschot, K. Papadodimas, and E. Verlinde, “The chiral ring of AdS3/CFT2 and the attractor mechanism,”JHEP03(2009) 030,arXiv:0809.0507 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  58. [58]

    Black Hole Berry Phase

    J. de Boer, K. Papadodimas, and E. Verlinde, “Black Hole Berry Phase,”Phys. Rev. Lett.103(2009) 131301,arXiv:0809.5062 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  59. [59]

    BPS chaos,

    Y. Chen, H. W. Lin, and S. H. Shenker, “BPS chaos,”SciPost Phys.18no. 2, (2025) 072,arXiv:2407.19387 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    No entropy enigmas for N=4 dyons

    A. Dabholkar, M. Guica, S. Murthy, and S. Nampuri, “No entropy enigmas for N=4 dyons,”JHEP06(2010) 007,arXiv:0903.2481 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  61. [61]

    Moulting Black Holes

    I. Bena, B. D. Chowdhury, J. de Boer, S. El-Showk, and M. Shigemori, “Moulting Black Holes,”JHEP03(2012) 094,arXiv:1108.0411 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  62. [62]

    Split States, Entropy Enigmas, Holes and Halos

    F. Denef and G. W. Moore, “Split states, entropy enigmas, holes and halos,”JHEP11 (2011) 129,arXiv:hep-th/0702146

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  63. [63]

    Fortuity in SYK models,

    C.-M. Chang, Y. Chen, B. S. Sia, and Z. Yang, “Fortuity in SYK models,”JHEP08 (2025) 003,arXiv:2412.06902 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    The Holographic Landscape of Symmetric Product Orbifolds,

    A. Belin, A. Castro, C. A. Keller, and B. M¨ uhlmann, “The Holographic Landscape of Symmetric Product Orbifolds,”JHEP01(2020) 111,arXiv:1910.05342 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    Strings and near-extremal black holes in theories with largeN= 4 superconformal symmetry,

    S. Murthy and M. Rangamani, “Strings and near-extremal black holes in theories with largeN= 4 superconformal symmetry,”arXiv:2505.14380 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  66. [66]

    A holographic dual for string theory on AdS3×S 3×S 3×S 1,

    L. Eberhardt, M. R. Gaberdiel, and W. Li, “A holographic dual for string theory on AdS3×S 3×S 3×S 1,”JHEP08(2017) 111,arXiv:1707.02705 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2017

  67. [67]

    $\mathcal{N}=(3,3)$ holography on ${\rm AdS}_3 \times ({\rm S}^3 \times {\rm S}^3 \times {\rm S}^1)/\mathbb Z_2$

    L. Eberhardt and I. G. Zadeh, “N= (3,3) holography on AdS 3 ×(S 3 ×S 3 ×S 1)/Z2,” JHEP07(2018) 143,arXiv:1805.09832 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  68. [68]

    Theta-term in Russian Doll Model: phase structure, quantum metric and BPS multifractality,

    A. Gorsky and I. Lyubimov, “Theta-term in Russian Doll Model: phase structure, quantum metric and BPS multifractality,”arXiv:2510.20758 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  69. [69]

    Bosonic fortuity in vector models,

    R. de Mello Koch, A. Ghosh, and H. J. R. Van Zyl, “Bosonic fortuity in vector models,”JHEP06(2025) 246,arXiv:2504.14181 [hep-th]. 77

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    1/16 BPS States in N=4 SYM

    C.-M. Chang and X. Yin, “1/16 BPS states inN= 4 super-Yang-Mills theory,”Phys. Rev. D88no. 10, (2013) 106005,arXiv:1305.6314 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  71. [71]

    Words to describe a black hole,

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin, “Words to describe a black hole,”JHEP02(2023) 109, arXiv:2209.06728 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  72. [72]

    The shape of non-graviton operators for SU(2),

    S. Choi, S. Kim, E. Lee, and J. Park, “The shape of non-graviton operators for SU(2),” JHEP09(2024) 029,arXiv:2209.12696 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    Finite N black hole cohomologies,

    J. Choi, S. Choi, S. Kim, J. Lee, and S. Lee, “Finite N black hole cohomologies,”JHEP 12(2024) 029,arXiv:2312.16443 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    Decoding stringy near-supersymmetric black holes,

    C.-M. Chang, L. Feng, Y.-H. Lin, and Y.-X. Tao, “Decoding stringy near-supersymmetric black holes,”SciPost Phys.16no. 4, (2024) 109, arXiv:2306.04673 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    Following Black Hole States,

    K. Budzik, H. Murali, and P. Vieira, “Following Black Hole States,” arXiv:2306.04693 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  76. [76]

    Towards quantum black hole microstates,

    S. Choi, S. Kim, E. Lee, S. Lee, and J. Park, “Towards quantum black hole microstates,”JHEP11(2023) 175,arXiv:2304.10155 [hep-th]. [Erratum: JHEP 03, 091 (2025)]

    work page arXiv 2023

  77. [77]

    BPS phases and fortuity in higher spin holography,

    S. Kim, J. Lee, S. Lee, and H. Oh, “BPS phases and fortuity in higher spin holography,”arXiv:2511.03105 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  78. [78]

    Two roads to fortuity in ABJM theory,

    C. Behan and L. P. de Gioia, “Two roads to fortuity in ABJM theory,” arXiv:2512.23603 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  79. [79]

    Fortuity and relevant deformation,

    J. Choi and S. Kim, “Fortuity and relevant deformation,”arXiv:2512.12674 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  80. [80]

    Fortuity in ABJM,

    A. Belin, P. Singh, R. Vadala, and A. Zaffaroni, “Fortuity in ABJM,” arXiv:2512.04146 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

Showing first 80 references.