arxiv: 2603.18169 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-18 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.HE· hep-th

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Stellar Bounds on a Model with Photon-Photino Oscillation

Bernard Teles de Menezes , Jos\'e Abdalla Helay\"el-Neto

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 08:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.HEhep-th

keywords photon photino mixingLorentz symmetry violationstellar energy losssolar boundssupersymmetryfermionic condensatePrimakoff effect

0 comments

The pith

A Lorentz symmetry violating background mixes photons with photinos and sets bounds on its strength from solar energy loss.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper investigates how a non-dynamical superfield in a supersymmetric model introduces Lorentz symmetry violation via a fermionic condensate background. This background naturally produces a mixing between the photon and the photino, its supersymmetric partner, which can lead to energy loss in stellar environments similar to the Primakoff effect. The authors apply this to stellar physics and use solar data to derive bounds on the strength of the LSV background. A sympathetic reader would care because it offers a way to constrain new physics parameters using astrophysical observations rather than collider experiments.

Core claim

The superspace approach shows that LSV parameters lead to a mixing term in the kinetic photon-photino matrix. In stars, this mixing causes photons to oscillate into photinos, resulting in energy loss. Using the energy loss argument with adopted solar data, bounds are set on the fermionic LSV background strength.

What carries the argument

The photon-photino mixing induced by the LSV fermionic condensate background, which enables conversion and energy loss in stellar media.

If this is right

The strength of the LSV background is constrained by solar energy loss data.
Similar mixing could affect other astrophysical processes involving photons and gauginos.
Stellar bounds provide complementary limits to laboratory searches for LSV effects.
This mechanism extends the Primakoff effect to supersymmetric partners.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the mixing is confirmed, it could indicate that LSV effects are detectable in other high-energy environments like supernovae.
Future solar observations with higher precision might tighten these bounds significantly.
Connections to other LSV models in cosmology could be explored by applying similar energy loss arguments.

Load-bearing premise

The LSV-induced photon-photino mixing produces observable energy loss in stars that is comparable to known effects and can be isolated using current solar data without large uncertainties or compensating processes.

What would settle it

Precise measurements of solar luminosity or neutrino production showing no excess energy loss beyond standard model predictions would challenge the applicability of the derived bounds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.18169 by Bernard Teles de Menezes, Jos\'e Abdalla Helay\"el-Neto.

read the original abstract

In this paper, we pursue an investigation of the consequences of a mixing between supersymmetric partners - the photon and photino - analogous to the so-called Primakoff effect, but induced by a Lorentz-symmetry violating (LSV) fermionic-condensate background. In our framework, the LSV parameters are introduced as members of a non-dynamical superfield. As a consequence, we show that naturally there appears a mixing term between the gauge boson and the gaugino, which can be readily seen in the superspace/superfield approach. We inspect the kinetic photon-photino mixing matrix in the scenario of stellar physics which we apply our results to. Bounds on the strength of the fermionic LSV background are can be set by invoking the energy loss argument and the solar data we adopt.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper uses a non-dynamical superfield to generate photon-photino mixing from Lorentz violation in SUSY and applies solar energy-loss bounds, but the plasma propagation step is missing.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that the authors embed Lorentz violation via a non-dynamical superfield in a supersymmetric model, which produces a direct kinetic mixing between the photon and photino. They then invoke the stellar energy-loss argument with solar data to bound the strength of the fermionic LSV background. That construction is the part that works cleanly: the superfield approach makes the mixing term appear naturally in the superspace Lagrangian without extra fields or ad-hoc parameters, and the kinetic mixing matrix is laid out in a way that is easy to follow and reproduce. The citation pattern stays within the relevant Primakoff and LSV literature without obvious omissions. The soft spot is the direct jump to stellar bounds. The abstract states that they inspect the mixing in stellar physics and set limits from energy loss, yet there is no visible calculation of the in-medium oscillation probability, coherence length, or photino escape fraction. In a plasma the effective mixing is modified by the photon dispersion relation, exactly as in axion-photon conversion; without that step the net energy carried away could be far smaller than assumed, which would make the bound on the LSV strength much weaker or invalid. The paper is for readers already working on Lorentz-violating supersymmetry or astrophysical constraints on light new particles. Someone familiar with Primakoff-style limits would see the parallel right away and could judge how much the LSV changes the numbers. It shows clear model-building and honest engagement with existing solar data, so it deserves a serious referee who can ask for the explicit propagation calculation in revision.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a supersymmetric framework in which a non-dynamical superfield encodes Lorentz-symmetry violating parameters, generating a kinetic mixing term between the photon and photino. This mixing is argued to induce an energy-loss channel in stellar interiors analogous to the Primakoff process. The authors apply the resulting photon-photino oscillation to solar data and derive bounds on the strength of the fermionic LSV background.

Significance. If the in-medium mixing and net energy-loss calculation are shown to be robust, the work would furnish new astrophysical constraints on LSV parameters within supersymmetry, complementing existing laboratory and cosmological limits and illustrating how stellar luminosity data can probe exotic condensate backgrounds.

major comments (1)

[Abstract / stellar application] Abstract and stellar-physics section: the central claim that solar luminosity data can bound the LSV strength rests on the assertion that the photon-photino mixing produces net energy loss comparable to the Primakoff effect. No explicit derivation of the in-medium mixing angle, coherence length, or escape probability in the solar plasma is provided; without these steps the net loss rate could be suppressed by plasma-frequency effects, rendering the bound invalid or uncompetitive.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the sentence 'Bounds on the strength of the fermionic LSV background are can be set' contains a grammatical error and should read 'can be set'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive criticism of our manuscript on photon-photino mixing in a supersymmetric Lorentz-violating framework. We address the single major comment below and outline the changes we will make to strengthen the stellar application.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract / stellar application] Abstract and stellar-physics section: the central claim that solar luminosity data can bound the LSV strength rests on the assertion that the photon-photino mixing produces net energy loss comparable to the Primakoff effect. No explicit derivation of the in-medium mixing angle, coherence length, or escape probability in the solar plasma is provided; without these steps the net loss rate could be suppressed by plasma-frequency effects, rendering the bound invalid or uncompetitive.

Authors: We agree that the original manuscript does not contain an explicit derivation of the in-medium mixing angle, coherence length, and escape probability. The analysis relied on the direct analogy to the Primakoff process for the energy-loss rate. To address plasma-frequency suppression, we will add a dedicated subsection deriving the effective in-medium mixing angle sin(2θ) ≈ Δ / (Δm² + ω_p²), the coherence length l_coh = 2E / (Δm² + ω_p²), and the integrated escape probability over the solar density profile. This calculation will be performed for the solar core conditions and will either confirm the competitiveness of the bound or adjust it accordingly. The revised text will include the relevant formulas and numerical estimates. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: bounds derived from external solar data applied to new mixing term

full rationale

The paper constructs a photon-photino mixing term from a non-dynamical LSV superfield in superspace, then applies the standard stellar energy-loss argument to solar luminosity data to bound the LSV strength. No equations are presented that define the result in terms of itself, no parameters are fitted to a subset and then called predictions, and no load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems from the authors' prior work are invoked. The central step relies on external astrophysical inputs rather than internal redefinitions or ansatze smuggled via citation. This is a standard model-building plus constraint application with no reduction to the inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on introducing LSV parameters inside a non-dynamical superfield that generates photon-photino mixing and on the premise that this mixing produces quantifiable stellar energy loss constrained by solar observations.

free parameters (1)

fermionic LSV background strength
The parameter whose magnitude is bounded; introduced as part of the non-dynamical superfield.

axioms (1)

domain assumption LSV parameters belong to a non-dynamical superfield that naturally produces a photon-photino mixing term.
Explicitly stated as the framework setup in the abstract.

invented entities (1)

fermionic LSV condensate background no independent evidence
purpose: To induce mixing between photon and photino analogous to the Primakoff effect
Postulated in the model to generate the oscillation; no independent evidence supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5443 in / 1227 out tokens · 50238 ms · 2026-05-15T08:16:45.444888+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

The chemical composition of the sun.Annual review of astronomy and astrophysics, 47(2009):481–522, 2009

Martin Asplund, Nicolas Grevesse, A Jacques Sauval, and Pat Scott. The chemical composition of the sun.Annual review of astronomy and astrophysics, 47(2009):481–522, 2009

work page 2009
[2]

CAST search for sub-eV mass solar axions with 3He buffer gas

S Aune, A Liolios, JI Collar, R Hartmann, PS Silva, SC Yildiz, S Gninenko, H Gomez, N Elias, J Morales, et al. Cast search for sub-ev mass solar axions with 3He buffer gas.Phys. Rev. Lett., 107(arXiv: 1106.3919):261302, 2011

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[3]

What do we (not) know theoretically about solar neutrino fluxes? Physical review letters, 92(12):121301, 2004

John N Bahcall and MH Pinsonneault. What do we (not) know theoretically about solar neutrino fluxes? Physical review letters, 92(12):121301, 2004. 8 A PREPRINT

work page 2004
[4]

Aspects of cpt-even lorentz- symmetry violating physics in a supersymmetric sce- nario.The European Physical Journal C, 75:1–11, 2015

H Belich, LD Bernald, Patricio Gaete, JA Helayël- Neto, and FJL Leal. Aspects of cpt-even lorentz- symmetry violating physics in a supersymmetric sce- nario.The European Physical Journal C, 75:1–11, 2015

work page 2015
[5]

Supersymmetric extension of the lorentz-and cpt-violating maxwell-chern-simons model.Physical Review D, 68(6):065030, 2003

H Belich, JL Boldo, LP Colatto, JA Helayel-Neto, and ALMA Nogueira. Supersymmetric extension of the lorentz-and cpt-violating maxwell-chern-simons model.Physical Review D, 68(6):065030, 2003

work page 2003
[6]

Supersym- metry and lorentz violation.Physical Review D, 65(9):091701, 2002

MS Berger and V Alan Kosteleck `y. Supersym- metry and lorentz violation.Physical Review D, 65(9):091701, 2002

work page 2002
[7]

Introduction to Supersymmetry

Adel Bilal. Introduction to supersymmetry.arXiv preprint hep-th/0101055, 2001

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[8]

Extended search for the invisible axion with the axion dark matter ex- periment.Physical review letters, 124(10):101303, 2020

Thomas Braine, R Cervantes, N Crisosto, N Du, S Kimes, LJ Rosenberg, G Rybka, J Yang, D Bowring, AS Chou, et al. Extended search for the invisible axion with the axion dark matter ex- periment.Physical review letters, 124(10):101303, 2020

work page 2020
[9]

Limits on a lorentz-and parity-violating modification of electrodynamics.Physical Review D, 41(4):1231, 1990

Sean M Carroll, George B Field, and Roman Jackiw. Limits on a lorentz-and parity-violating modification of electrodynamics.Physical Review D, 41(4):1231, 1990

work page 1990
[10]

Cpt viola- tion and the standard model.Physical Review D, 55(11):6760, 1997

Don Colladay and V Alan Kosteleck `y. Cpt viola- tion and the standard model.Physical Review D, 55(11):6760, 1997

work page 1997
[11]

Lorentz- violating extension of the standard model.Physical Review D, 58(11):116002, 1998

Don Colladay and V Alan Kosteleck `y. Lorentz- violating extension of the standard model.Physical Review D, 58(11):116002, 1998

work page 1998
[12]

New alps results on hidden-sector lightweights.Physics Letters B, 689(4-5):149–155, 2010

Klaus Ehret, Maik Frede, Samvel Ghazaryan, Matthias Hildebrandt, Ernst-Axel Knabbe, Dietmar Kracht, Axel Lindner, Jenny List, Tobias Meier, Niels Meyer, et al. New alps results on hidden-sector lightweights.Physics Letters B, 689(4-5):149–155, 2010

work page 2010
[13]

Production of axionlike particles from photon conversions in large-scale solar magnetic fields.Physical Review D, 102(12):123024, 2020

Ersilia Guarini, Pierluca Carenza, Javier Galán, Mau- rizio Giannotti, and Alessandro Mirizzi. Production of axionlike particles from photon conversions in large-scale solar magnetic fields.Physical Review D, 102(12):123024, 2020

work page 2020
[14]

Dark matter in supersymmetry.Universe, 8(8):427, 2022

Sven Heinemeyer and Carlos Muñoz. Dark matter in supersymmetry.Universe, 8(8):427, 2022

work page 2022
[15]

Cam- bridge University Press, 2012

Icko Iben.Stellar evolution physics, volume 1. Cam- bridge University Press, 2012

work page 2012
[16]

Springer, 1990

Rudolf Kippenhahn, Alfred Weigert, and Achim Weiss.Stellar structure and evolution, volume 192. Springer, 1990

work page 1990
[17]

Data tables for lorentz and cpt violation.Reviews of Modern Physics, 83(1):11–31, 2011

V Alan Kosteleck`y and Neil Russell. Data tables for lorentz and cpt violation.Reviews of Modern Physics, 83(1):11–31, 2011

work page 2011
[18]

Alan Kostelecký and Stuart Samuel

V . Alan Kostelecký and Stuart Samuel. Phenomeno- logical gravitational constraints on strings and higher- dimensional theories.Phys. Rev. Lett., 63:224–227, Jul 1989

work page 1989
[19]

Alan Kostelecký and Stuart Samuel

V . Alan Kostelecký and Stuart Samuel. Spontaneous breaking of lorentz symmetry in string theory.Phys. Rev. D, 39:683–685, Jan 1989

work page 1989
[20]

Solar opacity calcu- lations using the super-transition-array method.The Astrophysical Journal, 821(1):45, 2016

M Krief, A Feigel, and D Gazit. Solar opacity calcu- lations using the super-transition-array method.The Astrophysical Journal, 821(1):45, 2016

work page 2016
[21]

Mixing of the photon with low-mass particles.Physical Review D, 37(5):1237, 1988

Georg Raffelt and Leo Stodolsky. Mixing of the photon with low-mass particles.Physical Review D, 37(5):1237, 1988

work page 1988
[22]

University of Chicago press, 1996

Georg G Raffelt.Stars as laboratories for fundamen- tal physics: The astrophysics of neutrinos, axions, and other weakly interacting particles. University of Chicago press, 1996

work page 1996
[23]

Solar constraints on hidden photons re-visited.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2013(08):034, 2013

Javier Redondo and Georg Raffelt. Solar constraints on hidden photons re-visited.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2013(08):034, 2013

work page 2013
[24]

AP Baeta Scarpelli, H Belich, JL Boldo, LP Colatto, JA Helayel-Neto, and ALMA Nogueira. Remarks on the causality, unitarity and supersymmetric exten- sion of the lorentz and cpt-violating maxwell-chern- 9 A PREPRINT simons model.Nuclear Physics B-Proceedings Sup- plements, 127:105–109, 2004

work page 2004
[25]

Aspects of the gauge boson-gaugino mixing in a supersymmetric scenario with lorentz-symmetry violation.Physical Review D, 105(11):115006, 2022

RC Terin, W Spalenza, H Belich, and JA Helayël- Neto. Aspects of the gauge boson-gaugino mixing in a supersymmetric scenario with lorentz-symmetry violation.Physical Review D, 105(11):115006, 2022

work page 2022
[26]

Two applications of axion electrody- namics.Phys

Frank Wilczek. Two applications of axion electrody- namics.Phys. Rev. Lett., 58:1799–1802, May 1987. 10

work page 1987