Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 86 references

Factorizing semantic planning from motion recovery yields strong zero-shot instruction-guided video editing without external priors.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 22:06 UTC pith:RTEI72L3

load-bearing objection Solid open-source video-editing systems paper: factorization plus unpaired pretrain yields real zero-shot editing and near-commercial numbers; soft spots are N=1 anchors and VLM-only eval, not a broken argument. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2603.19226 v2 pith:RTEI72L3 submitted 2026-03-19 cs.CV

Under One Sun: Multi-Object Generative Perception of Materials and Illumination

Nobuo Yoshii , Xinran Nicole Han , Ryo Kawahara , Todd Zickler , Ko Nishino This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords instruction-guided video editingdiffusion transformersemantic anchoringmotion alignmentfactorized pre-trainingzero-shot editingflow matching
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Instruction-guided video editors usually fight a trade-off: change the meaning of a clip and the motion falls apart, or lock the motion and the edit fails. This paper argues the fight is unnecessary if the two jobs are learned separately. Semantic Anchoring lets the model plan the intended change on a few sparse frames by predicting semantic tokens together with video latents, while Motion Alignment teaches the same backbone to restore coherent dynamics from raw videos through simple restoration pretenses such as cube inpainting, speed changes, and tube shuffles. A first training stage uses only image-editing pairs and unpaired text-to-video data; that stage alone already produces usable zero-shot video edits. A short supervised fine-tuning stage on paired editing data then cleans up remaining conflicts. The resulting system, SAMA, matches or beats open-source peers and stays competitive with leading commercial editors on standard benchmarks, showing that internal factorization can replace brittle external conditioners.

Core claim

When a video diffusion backbone is first pre-trained to jointly predict sparse semantic anchors and to restore motion from unpaired video pretenses, strong instruction-guided video editing emerges even before any paired video-editing supervision is supplied; supervised fine-tuning then raises fidelity enough to reach state-of-the-art among open-source models and competitive results against commercial systems.

What carries the argument

Factorized Semantic Anchoring and Motion Alignment (SAMA): Semantic Anchoring injects SigLIP-derived semantic tokens at sparse anchor frames into the denoising sequence and supervises them with an L1 loss; Motion Alignment applies cube-inpainting, speed-perturbation, and tube-shuffle pretenses only to the source stream so the backbone internalizes temporal dynamics; the two are staged so that factorization precedes paired editing data.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes that one sparsely sampled anchor frame plus a fixed set of pooled semantic tokens is enough to plan the full edit, and that three hand-chosen restoration pretenses on unpaired video are enough to capture the motion that must be preserved.

What would settle it

Train the identical backbone with Semantic Anchoring disabled or with N=1 anchors replaced by dense frame-wise semantic tokens, keep Motion Alignment fixed, and measure whether zero-shot and final VIE-Bench scores collapse; if they do not, the claimed necessity of sparse factorization fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Paired video-editing datasets become less critical once semantic and motion representations are learned in a factorized pre-training stage.
  • External structural priors (skeletons, depth, VLM features) can be reduced or removed without sacrificing instruction fidelity or temporal coherence.
  • Zero-shot editing quality after Stage 0 alone can serve as a diagnostic of how well a backbone has internalized semantics versus dynamics.
  • The same factorization can be applied to longer clips and faster camera motion once stronger semantic tokenization is available.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If sparse anchors suffice for most edits, interactive editors could let users mark only a handful of keyframes rather than every frame.
  • The three pretenses resemble classic self-supervised video tasks; swapping them for newer masked or contrastive objectives is a direct, testable extension.
  • Commercial systems that currently inject heavy external conditions may be able to drop those modules once an analogous factorization is trained into the backbone.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. SAMA proposes a factorized approach to instruction-guided video editing that separates semantic structure planning from motion modeling inside a Wan2.1-T2V-14B diffusion transformer. Semantic Anchoring jointly predicts SigLIP-derived semantic tokens and video latents on sparse anchor frames (N=1 in all experiments) to stabilize instruction-aware structural edits; Motion Alignment pre-trains the same backbone on unpaired text-to-video data via three restoration pretexts (cube inpainting, speed perturbation, tube shuffle). Training is two-stage: factorized pre-training without paired video-edit supervision, followed by supervised fine-tuning on filtered paired editing data. The paper reports that Stage 0 alone yields strong zero-shot editing, and that the full model is state-of-the-art among open-source systems and competitive with commercial systems (e.g., Kling-Omni) on VIE-Bench, OpenVE-Bench, and ReCo-Bench under VLM judges, with ablations of SA, MA, and type embeddings.

Significance. If the factorization and zero-shot emergence hold under broader scrutiny, the work is a meaningful contribution: it reduces reliance on external structural priors (skeletons, depth, heavy VLM conditioning at test time) and shows that instruction-guided video editing can emerge from complementary semantic and motion pretexts plus modest paired SFT. Strengths include a clear two-stage design, multi-benchmark comparisons against many open- and closed-source systems (Tabs. 2–4), qualitative evidence of zero-shot behavior (Fig. 5), and module ablations showing complementary gains from SA and MA (Tab. 5, Figs. 6–7). Public release of code, models, and datasets would further increase impact. The main significance hinges on whether sparse single-frame semantic anchors plus the chosen motion pretexts truly capture the claimed semantic–motion factorization across harder motions and longer clips.

major comments (4)
  1. Sec. 3.2 and Sec. 4.1 fix N=1 uniformly sampled anchor frame and M=64 local + 1 global SigLIP tokens for all experiments, with no ablation of N or sampling strategy. The central factorization claim—that semantic edits are sparse/temporally stable enough for a single anchor to plan structure while motion is recovered from pretexts—depends on this choice. Without quantitative results for N>1, non-uniform anchors, or failure cases under fast motion/long clips (only residual zero-shot failures are listed in Sec. 4.3), it is hard to know when the structural plan is insufficient. An ablation of N and a stress set with large camera/object motion would make the claim load-bearing rather than a fixed hyperparameter.
  2. Tabs. 2–4 and Sec. 4.1 evaluate exclusively with VLM judges (GPT-4o, Gemini-2.5-Pro, Gemini-2.5-Flash-Thinking), while training data are also VLM-filtered (Appendix B, Qwen2.5-VL-72B with high thresholds). This creates a mild circularity risk: models optimized under VLM-filtered supervision may be preferentially scored by related VLM judges. Human preference studies or multi-judge agreement statistics on a fixed subset would strengthen the SOTA and commercial-competitiveness claims, especially for motion preservation and fine-grained instruction following.
  3. Tab. 5 and Figs. 6–7 ablate SA/MA on Wan2.2-T2V-5B trained on a Ditto-1M subset, whereas main results use Wan2.1-T2V-14B with the full multi-dataset Stage 0/1 mix (Tab. 1). Gains of +0.4–0.8 overall on the small setup may not transfer in magnitude or complementarity to the 14B model. Reporting SA/MA ablations (or at least SA off vs on) under the full 14B recipe on VIE-Bench would better support that both components are necessary for the reported SOTA numbers.
  4. Sec. 4.1 and Tab. 1 use selective subsets (Style only from Ditto-1M; Local Change, Background, Style, Subtitles from OpenVE-3M) after aggressive VLM filtering. The paper should quantify how much performance depends on this curation versus the factorization itself—e.g., results with unfiltered or full-category training—so that the zero-shot and SFT gains are not partly explained by data selection.
minor comments (6)
  1. Fig. 1 and several qualitative figures (Figs. 4, 10–12) are hard to read in the manuscript rendering; captions should state resolution, number of frames shown, and which stage (zero-shot vs SFT) produced each row.
  2. Eq. (4)–(5) reuse the same combined loss for Stage 0 and Stage 1; clarify whether MA enters only through the flow-matching target on perturbed sources (no extra loss term) so readers do not look for an explicit MA objective.
  3. Appendix A claims type embeddings beat shifted RoPE (Tab. 6, Fig. 8) but Tab. 6 labels are 'w/ PE' vs 'w/o PE', which is easy to confuse with positional encoding; rename to TE and state the exact RoPE baseline.
  4. Pretext sampling ratio 1:2:3:4 and task settings (30% mask, 2× speed, 2×2×2 tubes) appear only in Sec. 4.1/Appendix C; a short sensitivity note would help reproducibility.
  5. Related Work is thorough but dense; a short positioning paragraph explicitly contrasting SAMA with ICVE’s unpaired pretraining and VideoREPA/FFP relational distillation would clarify novelty of the SA+MA factorization.
  6. Typos/consistency: 'an explict prior' (Sec. 5); 'Diffueraser' vs DiffuEraser in references; arXiv header in the PDF text shows 2603.19228 while the review package cites 2603.19226—align identifiers before camera-ready.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: SAMA's claims are empirical model results, not algebraic identities forced by construction or self-citation.

full rationale

SAMA's load-bearing chain is architectural and empirical, not a closed derivation. Semantic Anchoring (Sec. 3.2, Eqs. 3–4) trains the DiT to jointly denoise video latents and predict SigLIP-pooled tokens from sparse target anchors; Motion Alignment (Sec. 3.3) is standard self-supervised restoration (cube inpainting, speed perturbation, tube shuffle) on unpaired T2V data. Stage 0 uses only image-editing pairs and T2V data—no paired video-instruction editing supervision—yet produces usable zero-shot edits (Sec. 4.3, Fig. 5), which is independent evidence for the factorization rather than a tautology. Stage 1 SFT and ablations (Tab. 5, Figs. 6–7) show complementary gains of SA and MA; multi-bench comparisons (Tabs. 2–4) are against external open- and closed-source systems under fixed VLM judges. Type embeddings, flow-matching loss, and pretext ratios are design choices, not fitted parameters renamed as predictions. Mild methodological correlation between VLM-based data filtering (Appendix B) and VLM evaluation does not make the central claim reduce to its inputs by construction. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input-as-prediction, uniqueness theorem imported from the authors, or ansatz smuggled via self-citation was found. Score 0 is appropriate.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 6 axioms · 3 invented entities

SAMA is an empirical systems paper. Load-bearing content is a set of modeling choices and hyperparameters on top of a pretrained Wan T2V prior and standard flow-matching, plus the domain premise that semantic structure and motion can be learned as complementary factorized capabilities. No new physical entities; invented pieces are architectural modules and pretext formulations whose only evidence is the paper’s own ablations and benchmarks.

free parameters (7)
  • semantic loss weight λ = 0.1
    Set to 0.1 in Eq. (4); balances flow-matching vs semantic L1. Directly affects SA strength and reported convergence.
  • number of anchor frames N = 1
    Fixed to N=1 for efficiency in all experiments despite the method being defined for general N; central to the sparse-anchor claim.
  • local semantic tokens M per anchor = 64
    Fixed M=64 (+1 global) after SigLIP pooling; controls semantic bottleneck capacity.
  • pretext sampling ratio (none:cube:speed:tube) = 1:2:3:4
    Hand-chosen 1:2:3:4 mixture on text-to-video data for Motion Alignment; shapes what temporal skills are learned.
  • cube inpainting mask ratio / speed factor / tube grid = 30%; 2×; 2×2×2
    30% temporal block mask, 2× acceleration, 2×2×2 tube shuffle—task hyperparameters that define MA supervision.
  • learning rate, batch sizes, EMA decay = 2e-5; 448/112; 0.9998
    LR 2e-5, image batch 448 / video 112, EMA 0.9998; standard but claim-dependent training knobs.
  • VLM data-filter thresholds = images ≥9; videos IF≥8,VQ≥9,CP≥8,MC≥8
    Image thresholds ≥9 on three scores; video ≥8/9/8/8 on four scores via Qwen2.5-VL-72B—post-hoc selection that defines the training distribution.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Flow-matching video DiT (Wan2.1-T2V-14B prior) is an adequate generative backbone for instruction-conditioned V2V editing.
    Entire method is built on this pretrained prior and L_FM objective (Sec. 3 Preliminary, 3.1).
  • domain assumption Semantic edits are sparse and temporally stable; a few (here one) anchor frames suffice to determine the desired visual modification.
    Stated in Introduction as the core observation motivating factorization; operationalized as N=1 SA.
  • domain assumption Motion coherence follows physical/temporal dynamics learnable from large-scale raw videos via cube inpainting, speed perturbation, and tube shuffle without edit labels.
    Introduction and Sec. 3.3; if false, MA would not transfer to editing motion preservation.
  • domain assumption SigLIP patch features pooled into M local + 1 global tokens are faithful semantic targets for instruction-aware structural planning.
    Sec. 3.2; SA loss is pure L1 to these extracted tokens.
  • ad hoc to paper Learned type embeddings (source/target/semantic ids) disambiguate token roles with less prior disruption than shifted RoPE.
    Sec. 3.1 and Appendix A; supported only by authors’ LoRA ablation on a 5B subset.
  • domain assumption Automatic VLM judges (GPT-4o, Gemini-2.5-Pro, Gemini-2.5-Flash-Thinking) are reliable proxies for instruction following, preservation, quality, and naturalness.
    All main tables depend on these judges (Sec. 4.1); no human correlation study in the paper.
invented entities (3)
  • Semantic Anchoring (SA) module no independent evidence
    purpose: Jointly denoise projected SigLIP semantic tokens with target latents and supervise with L1 to stabilize instruction-consistent structure.
    Core named contribution; evidence is internal ablations and loss curves only.
  • Motion Alignment (MA) pretext suite for editing no independent evidence
    purpose: Internalize temporal dynamics via cube inpainting, speed perturbation, and tube shuffle on the source stream during factorized pre-training.
    Pretexts are known SSL motifs; their packaging as MA for instruction video editing is paper-specific, evidenced only by authors’ qualitative/quantitative ablations.
  • SAMA two-stage factorized training pipeline no independent evidence
    purpose: Separate unpaired semantic–motion pre-training from paired SFT so zero-shot editing emerges before scarce edit supervision.
    System-level invention; zero-shot figures support utility but no external replication yet.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 23441 in / 4336 out tokens · 51764 ms · 2026-07-13T22:06:57.573506+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce Multi-Object Generative Perception (MultiGP), a generative inverse rendering method for stochastic sampling of all radiometric constituents -- reflectance, texture, and illumination -- underlying object appearance from a single image. Our key idea to solve this inherently ambiguous radiometric disentanglement is to leverage the fact that while their texture and reflectance may differ, objects in the same scene are all lit by the same illumination. MultiGP exploits this consensus to produce samples of reflectance, texture, and illumination from a single image of known shapes based on four key technical contributions: a cascaded end-to-end architecture that combines image-space and angular-space disentanglement; Coordinated Scheduling for diffusion convergence to a single consistent illumination estimate; Axial Attention applied to facilitate ``cross-talk'' between objects of different reflectance; and a Texture Extraction ControlNet to preserve high-frequency texture details while ensuring decoupling from estimated lighting. Experimental results demonstrate that MultiGP effectively leverages the complementary spatial and frequency characteristics of multiple object appearances to recover individual texture and reflectance as well as the common illumination.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 29 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Instructpix2pix: Learning to follow image editing instructions

    Tim Brooks, Aleksander Holynski, and Alexei A Efros. Instructpix2pix: Learning to follow image editing instructions. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 18392–18402, 2023

    2023

  2. [2]

    Magicbrush: A manually annotated dataset for instruction-guided image editing.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:31428–31449, 2023

    Kai Zhang, Lingbo Mo, Wenhu Chen, Huan Sun, and Yu Su. Magicbrush: A manually annotated dataset for instruction-guided image editing.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:31428–31449, 2023

    2023

  3. [3]

    Ultraedit: Instruction-based fine-grained image editing at scale.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:3058–3093, 2024

    Haozhe Zhao, Xiaojian Shawn Ma, Liang Chen, Shuzheng Si, Rujie Wu, Kaikai An, Peiyu Yu, Minjia Zhang, Qing Li, and Baobao Chang. Ultraedit: Instruction-based fine-grained image editing at scale.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:3058–3093, 2024

    2024

  4. [4]

    Anyedit: Mastering unified high-quality image editing for any idea.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15738, 2024

    Qifan Yu, Wei Chow, Zhongqi Yue, Kaihang Pan, Yang Wu, Xiaoyang Wan, Juncheng Li, Siliang Tang, Hanwang Zhang, and Yueting Zhuang. Anyedit: Mastering unified high-quality image editing for any idea.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15738, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Step1x-edit: A practical framework for general image editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.17761, 2025

    Shiyu Liu, Yucheng Han, Peng Xing, Fukun Yin, Rui Wang, Wei Cheng, Jiaqi Liao, Yingming Wang, Honghao Fu, Chunrui Han, et al. Step1x-edit: A practical framework for general image editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.17761, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Cologen: Progressive learning of concept-localization duality for unified image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.22150, 2026

    YuXin Song, Yu Lu, Haoyuan Sun, Huanjin Yao, Fanglong Liu, Yifan Sun, Haocheng Feng, Hang Zhou, and Jingdong Wang. Cologen: Progressive learning of concept-localization duality for unified image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.22150, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    Seed-data-edit technical report: A hybrid dataset for instructional image editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04007, 2024

    Yuying Ge, Sijie Zhao, Chen Li, Yixiao Ge, and Ying Shan. Seed-data-edit technical report: A hybrid dataset for instructional image editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04007, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Seededit 3.0: Fast and high-quality generative image editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.05083, 2025

    Peng Wang, Yichun Shi, Xiaochen Lian, Zhonghua Zhai, Xin Xia, Xuefeng Xiao, Weilin Huang, and Jianchao Yang. Seededit 3.0: Fast and high-quality generative image editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.05083, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Qwen-image technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02324, 2025

    Chenfei Wu, Jiahao Li, Jingren Zhou, Junyang Lin, Kaiyuan Gao, Kun Yan, Sheng-ming Yin, Shuai Bai, Xiao Xu, Yilei Chen, et al. Qwen-image technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02324, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Tune-a-video: One-shot tuning of image diffusion models for text-to-video generation

    Jay Zhangjie Wu, Yixiao Ge, Xintao Wang, Stan Weixian Lei, Yuchao Gu, Yufei Shi, Wynne Hsu, Ying Shan, Xiaohu Qie, and Mike Zheng Shou. Tune-a-video: One-shot tuning of image diffusion models for text-to-video generation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 7623–7633, 2023

    2023

  11. [11]

    Tokenflow: Unified image tokenizer for multimodal understanding and generation

    Liao Qu, Huichao Zhang, Yiheng Liu, Xu Wang, Yi Jiang, Yiming Gao, Hu Ye, Daniel K Du, Zehuan Yuan, and Xinglong Wu. Tokenflow: Unified image tokenizer for multimodal understanding and generation. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 2545–2555, 2025

    2025

  12. [12]

    Video-p2p: Video editing with cross-attention control

    Shaoteng Liu, Yuechen Zhang, Wenbo Li, Zhe Lin, and Jiaya Jia. Video-p2p: Video editing with cross-attention control. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8599–8608, 2024

    2024

  13. [13]

    Fatezero: Fusing attentions for zero-shot text-based video editing

    Chenyang Qi, Xiaodong Cun, Yong Zhang, Chenyang Lei, Xintao Wang, Ying Shan, and Qifeng Chen. Fatezero: Fusing attentions for zero-shot text-based video editing. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 15932–15942, 2023

    2023

  14. [14]

    Instructx: Towards unified visual editing with mllm guidance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08485, 2025

    Chong Mou, Qichao Sun, Yanze Wu, Pengze Zhang, Xinghui Li, Fulong Ye, Songtao Zhao, and Qian He. Instructx: Towards unified visual editing with mllm guidance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08485, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Kling-omni technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16776, 2025

    Kling Team, Jialu Chen, Yuanzheng Ci, Xiangyu Du, Zipeng Feng, Kun Gai, Sainan Guo, Feng Han, Jingbin He, Kang He, et al. Kling-omni technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16776, 2025. 13

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Controlvideo: Training-free controllable text-to-video generation

    Yabo Zhang, Yuxiang Wei, Dongsheng Jiang, XIAOPENG ZHANG, Wangmeng Zuo, and Qi Tian. Controlvideo: Training-free controllable text-to-video generation. InThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations

  17. [17]

    Control-a-video: Controllable text-to-video diffusion models with motion prior and reward feedback learning, 2024

    Weifeng Chen, Yatai Ji, Jie Wu, Hefeng Wu, Pan Xie, Jiashi Li, Xin Xia, Xuefeng Xiao, and Liang Lin. Control-a-video: Controllable text-to-video diffusion models with motion prior and reward feedback learning, 2024

    2024

  18. [18]

    Movie gen: A cast of media foundation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.13720, 2024

    Adam Polyak, Amit Zohar, Andrew Brown, Andros Tjandra, Animesh Sinha, Ann Lee, Apoorv Vyas, Bowen Shi, Chih-Yao Ma, Ching-Yao Chuang, et al. Movie gen: A cast of media foundation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.13720, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Video generation models as world simulators

    Tim Brooks, Bill Peebles, Connor Holmes, Will DePue, Yufei Guo, Leo Jing, David Schnurr, Joe Taylor, Troy Luhman, Eric Luhman, et al. Video generation models as world simulators. OpenAI Blog, 1(8):1, 2024

    2024

  20. [20]

    Hunyuanvideo: A systematic framework for large video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03603, 2024

    Weijie Kong, Qi Tian, Zijian Zhang, et al. Hunyuanvideo: A systematic framework for large video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03603, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Cosmos: World foundation model platform for physical ai.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.03575, 2025

    Niket Agarwal et al. Cosmos: World foundation model platform for physical ai.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.03575, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    World models.arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.10122, 2018

    David Ha and Jürgen Schmidhuber. World models.arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.10122, 2018

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  23. [23]

    Runway gen-4.https://runwayml.com/, 2025

    Runway. Runway gen-4.https://runwayml.com/, 2025

    2025

  24. [24]

    Tokenflow: Consistent diffusion features for consistent video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10373, 2023

    Michal Geyer, Omer Bar-Tal, Shai Bagon, and Tali Dekel. Tokenflow: Consistent diffusion features for consistent video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10373, 2023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Videdit: Zero-shot and spatially aware text-driven video editing.Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2023

    Paul Couairon, Clément Rambour, Jean-Emmanuel Haugeard, and Nicolas Thome. Videdit: Zero-shot and spatially aware text-driven video editing.Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2023

    2023

  26. [26]

    Rerender a video: Zero-shot text-guided video-to-video translation

    Shuai Yang, Yifan Zhou, Ziwei Liu, and Chen Change Loy. Rerender a video: Zero-shot text-guided video-to-video translation. InSIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Conference Papers, pages 1–11, 2023

    2023

  27. [27]

    Explanatory instructions: Towards unified vision tasks understanding and zero-shot generalization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.18525, 2024

    Yang Shen, Xiu-Shen Wei, Yifan Sun, Yuxin Song, Tao Yuan, Jian Jin, Heyang Xu, Yazhou Yao, and Errui Ding. Explanatory instructions: Towards unified vision tasks understanding and zero-shot generalization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.18525, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Flatten: Optical flow-guided attention for consistent text-to-video editing

    Yuren Cong, Mengmeng Xu, Christian Simon, Shoufa Chen, Jiawei Ren, Yanping Xie, Juan- Manuel Perez-Rua, Bodo Rosenhahn, Tao Xiang, and Sen He. Flatten: Optical flow-guided attention for consistent text-to-video editing. InProceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2024

    2024

  29. [29]

    Señorita-2m: A high-quality instruction-based dataset for general video editing by video specialists.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.06734, 2025

    Bojia Zi, Penghui Ruan, Marco Chen, Xianbiao Qi, Shaozhe Hao, Shihao Zhao, Youze Huang, Bin Liang, Rong Xiao, and Kam-Fai Wong. Señorita-2m: A high-quality instruction-based dataset for general video editing by video specialists.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.06734, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Insvie-1m: Effective instruction-based video editing with elaborate dataset construction

    Yuhui Wu, Liyi Chen, Ruibin Li, Shihao Wang, Chenxi Xie, and Lei Zhang. Insvie-1m: Effective instruction-based video editing with elaborate dataset construction. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 16692–16701, 2025

    2025

  31. [31]

    Scaling instruction-based video editing with a high-quality synthetic dataset.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.15742, 2025

    Qingyan Bai, Qiuyu Wang, Hao Ouyang, Yue Yu, Hanlin Wang, Wen Wang, Ka Leong Cheng, Shuailei Ma, Yanhong Zeng, Zichen Liu, et al. Scaling instruction-based video editing with a high-quality synthetic dataset.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.15742, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Region- constraint in-context generation for instructional video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.17650, 2025

    Zhongwei Zhang, Fuchen Long, Wei Li, Zhaofan Qiu, Wu Liu, Ting Yao, and Tao Mei. Region- constraint in-context generation for instructional video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.17650, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Openve-3m: A large-scale high-quality dataset for instruction-guided video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.07826, 2025

    Haoyang He, Jie Wang, Jiangning Zhang, Zhucun Xue, Xingyuan Bu, Qiangpeng Yang, Shilei Wen, and Lei Xie. Openve-3m: A large-scale high-quality dataset for instruction-guided video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.07826, 2025. 14

    arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Unic: Unified in-context video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.04216, 2025

    Zixuan Ye, Xuanhua He, Quande Liu, Qiulin Wang, Xintao Wang, Pengfei Wan, Di Zhang, Kun Gai, Qifeng Chen, and Wenhan Luo. Unic: Unified in-context video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.04216, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Diffueraser: A diffusion model for video inpainting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.10018, 2025

    Xiaowen Li, Haolan Xue, Peiran Ren, and Liefeng Bo. Diffueraser: A diffusion model for video inpainting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.10018, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Vace: All-in-one video creation and editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07598, 2025

    Zeyinzi Jiang, Zhen Han, Chaojie Mao, Jingfeng Zhang, Yulin Pan, and Yu Liu. Vace: All-in-one video creation and editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07598, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Lucy edit: Open-weight text-guided video editing

    DecartAI Team. Lucy edit: Open-weight text-guided video editing. 2025

    2025

  38. [38]

    Consistent video-to-video transfer using synthetic dataset.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.00213, 2023

    Jiaxin Cheng, Tianjun Xiao, and Tong He. Consistent video-to-video transfer using synthetic dataset.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.00213, 2023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    In- context learning with unpaired clips for instruction-based video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.14648, 2025

    Xinyao Liao, Xianfang Zeng, Ziye Song, Zhoujie Fu, Gang Yu, and Guosheng Lin. In- context learning with unpaired clips for instruction-based video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.14648, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Editverse: Unifying image and video editing and generation with in-context learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.20360, 2025

    Xuan Ju, Tianyu Wang, Yuqian Zhou, He Zhang, Qing Liu, Nanxuan Zhao, Zhifei Zhang, Yijun Li, Yuanhao Cai, Shaoteng Liu, et al. Editverse: Unifying image and video editing and generation with in-context learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.20360, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Unified video editing with temporal reasoner.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.07469, 2025

    Xiangpeng Yang, Ji Xie, Yiyuan Yang, Yan Huang, Min Xu, and Qiang Wu. Unified video editing with temporal reasoner.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.07469, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Omni-video: Democratizing unified video understanding and generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06119, 2025

    Zhiyu Tan, Hao Yang, Luozheng Qin, Jia Gong, Mengping Yang, and Hao Li. Omni-video: Democratizing unified video understanding and generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06119, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Univideo: Unified understanding, generation, and editing for videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08377, 2025

    Cong Wei, Quande Liu, Zixuan Ye, Qiulin Wang, Xintao Wang, Pengfei Wan, Kun Gai, and Wenhu Chen. Univideo: Unified understanding, generation, and editing for videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08377, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Vino: A unified visual generator with interleaved omnimodal context.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.02358, 2026

    Junyi Chen, Tong He, Zhoujie Fu, Pengfei Wan, Kun Gai, and Weicai Ye. Vino: A unified visual generator with interleaved omnimodal context.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.02358, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    Representation alignment for generation: Training diffusion transformers is easier than you think.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06940, 2024

    Sihyun Yu, Sangkyung Kwak, Huiwon Jang, Jongheon Jeong, Jonathan Huang, Jinwoo Shin, and Saining Xie. Representation alignment for generation: Training diffusion transformers is easier than you think.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06940, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Repa-e: Unlocking vae for end-to-end tuning of latent diffusion transformers

    Xingjian Leng, Jaskirat Singh, Yunzhong Hou, Zhenchang Xing, Saining Xie, and Liang Zheng. Repa-e: Unlocking vae for end-to-end tuning of latent diffusion transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 18262–18272, 2025

    2025

  47. [47]

    Repa works until it doesn’t: Early- stopped, holistic alignment supercharges diffusion training.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.16792, 2025

    Ziqiao Wang, Wangbo Zhao, Yuhao Zhou, Zekai Li, Zhiyuan Liang, Mingjia Shi, Xuanlei Zhao, Pengfei Zhou, Kaipeng Zhang, Zhangyang Wang, et al. Repa works until it doesn’t: Early- stopped, holistic alignment supercharges diffusion training.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.16792, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    No other representation component is needed: Diffusion transformers can provide representation guidance by themselves.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.02831, 2025

    Dengyang Jiang, Mengmeng Wang, Liuzhuozheng Li, Lei Zhang, Haoyu Wang, Wei Wei, Guang Dai, Yanning Zhang, and Jingdong Wang. No other representation component is needed: Diffusion transformers can provide representation guidance by themselves.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.02831, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Semanticgen: Video generation in semantic space

    Jianhong Bai, Xiaoshi Wu, Xintao Wang, Xiao Fu, Yuanxing Zhang, Qinghe Wang, Xiaoyu Shi, Menghan Xia, Zuozhu Liu, Haoji Hu, et al. Semanticgen: Video generation in semantic space. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.20619, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Videorepa: Learning physics for video generation through relational alignment with foundation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23656, 2025

    Xiangdong Zhang, Jiaqi Liao, Shaofeng Zhang, Fanqing Meng, Xiangpeng Wan, Junchi Yan, and Yu Cheng. Videorepa: Learning physics for video generation through relational alignment with foundation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23656, 2025. 15

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Ffp-300k: Scaling first-frame propagation for generalizable video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.01720, 2026

    Xijie Huang, Chengming Xu, Donghao Luo, Xiaobin Hu, Peng Tang, Xu Peng, Jiangning Zhang, Chengjie Wang, and Yanwei Fu. Ffp-300k: Scaling first-frame propagation for generalizable video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.01720, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    Speednet: Learning the speediness in videos

    Sagie Benaim, Ariel Ephrat, Oran Lang, Inbar Mosseri, William T Freeman, Michael Rubinstein, Michal Irani, and Tali Dekel. Speednet: Learning the speediness in videos. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 9922–9931, 2020

    2020

  53. [53]

    Video playback rate perception for self-supervised spatio-temporal representation learning

    Yuan Yao, Chang Liu, Dezhao Luo, Yu Zhou, and Qixiang Ye. Video playback rate perception for self-supervised spatio-temporal representation learning. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 6548–6557, 2020

    2020

  54. [54]

    Self-supervised video representation learning by pace prediction

    Jiangliu Wang, Jianbo Jiao, and Yun-Hui Liu. Self-supervised video representation learning by pace prediction. InEuropean conference on computer vision, pages 504–521. Springer, 2020

    2020

  55. [55]

    Self-supervised video representation learning with space-time cubic puzzles

    Dahun Kim, Donghyeon Cho, and In So Kweon. Self-supervised video representation learning with space-time cubic puzzles. InProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 33, pages 8545–8552, 2019

    2019

  56. [56]

    Videomae: Masked autoencoders are data-efficient learners for self-supervised video pre-training.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:10078–10093, 2022

    Zhan Tong, Yibing Song, Jue Wang, and Limin Wang. Videomae: Masked autoencoders are data-efficient learners for self-supervised video pre-training.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:10078–10093, 2022

    2022

  57. [57]

    Yaron Lipman, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Heli Ben-Hamu, Maximilian Nickel, and Matthew Le. Flow matching for generative modeling. InThe Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

    2023

  58. [59]

    High- resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Björn Ommer. High- resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022

    2022

  59. [60]

    Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding.Neurocomputing, 568:127063, 2024

    Jianlin Su, Murtadha Ahmed, Yu Lu, Shengfeng Pan, Wen Bo, and Yunfeng Liu. Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding.Neurocomputing, 568:127063, 2024

    2024

  60. [61]

    Query-kontext: An unified multimodal model for image generation and editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.26641, 2025

    Yuxin Song, Wenkai Dong, Shizun Wang, Qi Zhang, Song Xue, Tao Yuan, Hu Yang, Haocheng Feng, Hang Zhou, Xinyan Xiao, et al. Query-kontext: An unified multimodal model for image generation and editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.26641, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  61. [62]

    Sigmoid loss for language image pre-training

    Xiaohua Zhai, Basil Mustafa, Alexander Kolesnikov, and Lucas Beyer. Sigmoid loss for language image pre-training. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 11975–11986, 2023

    2023

  62. [63]

    It takes two: Masked appearance-motion modeling for self-supervised video transformer pre-training.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.05234, 2022

    Yuxin Song, Min Yang, Wenhao Wu, Dongliang He, Fu Li, and Jingdong Wang. It takes two: Masked appearance-motion modeling for self-supervised video transformer pre-training.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.05234, 2022

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  63. [64]

    Videomae v2: Scaling video masked autoencoders with dual masking

    Limin Wang, Bingkun Huang, Zhiyu Zhao, Zhan Tong, Yinan He, Yi Wang, Yali Wang, and Yu Qiao. Videomae v2: Scaling video masked autoencoders with dual masking. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 14549–14560, 2023

    2023

  64. [65]

    Koala-36m: A large-scale video dataset improving consistency between fine-grained conditions and video content

    Qiuheng Wang, Yukai Shi, Jiarong Ou, Rui Chen, Ke Lin, Jiahao Wang, Boyuan Jiang, Haotian Yang, Mingwu Zheng, Xin Tao, et al. Koala-36m: A large-scale video dataset improving consistency between fine-grained conditions and video content. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 8428–8437, 2025

    2025

  65. [66]

    Motionbench: Benchmarking and improving fine-grained video motion understanding for vision language models

    Wenyi Hong, Yean Cheng, Zhuoyi Yang, Weihan Wang, Lefan Wang, Xiaotao Gu, Shiyu Huang, Yuxiao Dong, and Jie Tang. Motionbench: Benchmarking and improving fine-grained video motion understanding for vision language models. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 8450–8460, 2025. 16

    2025

  66. [67]

    Nohumansrequired: Autonomous high-quality image editing triplet mining.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.14119, 2025

    Maksim Kuprashevich, Grigorii Alekseenko, Irina Tolstykh, Georgii Fedorov, Bulat Suleimanov, Vladimir Dokholyan, and Aleksandr Gordeev. Nohumansrequired: Autonomous high-quality image editing triplet mining.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.14119, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  67. [68]

    Pico-banana-400k: A large-scale dataset for text-guided image editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.19808, 2025

    Yusu Qian, Eli Bocek-Rivele, Liangchen Song, Jialing Tong, Yinfei Yang, Jiasen Lu, Wenze Hu, and Zhe Gan. Pico-banana-400k: A large-scale dataset for text-guided image editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.19808, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  68. [69]

    Gpt-image-edit-1.5 m: A million-scale, gpt-generated image dataset.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.21033, 2025

    Yuhan Wang, Siwei Yang, Bingchen Zhao, Letian Zhang, Qing Liu, Yuyin Zhou, and Cihang Xie. Gpt-image-edit-1.5 m: A million-scale, gpt-generated image dataset.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.21033, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  69. [70]

    X2edit: Revisiting arbitrary-instruction image editing through self-constructed data and task-aware representation learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.07607, 2025

    Jian Ma, Xujie Zhu, Zihao Pan, Qirong Peng, Xu Guo, Chen Chen, and Haonan Lu. X2edit: Revisiting arbitrary-instruction image editing through self-constructed data and task-aware representation learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.07607, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  70. [71]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020

    2020

  71. [72]

    Kling1.6.https://app.klingai.com/, 2025

    Kuaishou. Kling1.6.https://app.klingai.com/, 2025

    2025

  72. [73]

    Minimax-remover: Taming bad noise helps video object removal.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.24873, 2025

    Bojia Zi, Weixuan Peng, Xianbiao Qi, Jianan Wang, Shihao Zhao, Rong Xiao, and Kam-Fai Wong. Minimax-remover: Taming bad noise helps video object removal.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.24873, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  73. [74]

    Pika: Idea-to-video platform (web product).https://pika.art/

  74. [75]

    Hello gpt-4o

    OpenAI. Hello gpt-4o. Blog post, May 2024

    2024

  75. [76]

    Gemini 2.5: Pushing the frontier with advanced reasoning, multimodality, long context, and next generation agentic capabilities.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06261, 2025

    Gheorghe Comanici, Eric Bieber, Mike Schaekermann, Ice Pasupat, Noveen Sachdeva, Inderjit Dhillon, Marcel Blistein, Ori Ram, Dan Zhang, Evan Rosen, et al. Gemini 2.5: Pushing the frontier with advanced reasoning, multimodality, long context, and next generation agentic capabilities.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06261, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  76. [77]

    Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805, 2023

    Gemini Team, Rohan Anil, Sebastian Borgeaud, Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jiahui Yu, Radu Soricut, Johan Schalkwyk, Andrew M Dai, Anja Hauth, Katie Millican, et al. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805, 2023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  77. [78]

    Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314, 2025

    Team Wan, Ang Wang, Baole Ai, Bin Wen, Chaojie Mao, Chen-Wei Xie, Di Chen, Feiwu Yu, Haiming Zhao, Jianxiao Yang, et al. Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  78. [79]

    Qwen2.5-vl technical report, 2025

    Shuai Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, Sibo Song, Kai Dang, Peng Wang, Shijie Wang, Jun Tang, Humen Zhong, Yuanzhi Zhu, Mingkun Yang, Zhaohai Li, Jianqiang Wan, Pengfei Wang, Wei Ding, Zheren Fu, Yiheng Xu, Jiabo Ye, Xi Zhang, Tianbao Xie, Zesen Cheng, Hang Zhang, Zhibo Yang, Haiyang Xu, and Junyang Lin. Qwen2.5-vl technical report, 2...

    2025

  79. [82]

    Instruction Following: How well does the edited video implement the user’s specific instruction? - 10: Perfectly follows all aspects - 7-9: Mostly follows with minor issues - 4-6: Partially follows, some aspects missing - 1-3: Does not follow the instruction

  80. [83]

    instruction_following_score

    Visual Quality: Is the edited video visually coherent and natural-looking? - 10: Perfect quality, seamless editing - 7-9: High quality, minor artifacts - 4-6: Moderate quality, noticeable issues - 1-3: Poor quality, obvious problems # Output Format: Return ONLY a JSON object with this exact structure: { "instruction_following_score": <number between 1 and...

Showing first 80 references.