Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Goedel-Code-Prover: Hierarchical Proof Search for Open State-of-the-Art Code Verification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2603.19329 v3 pith:ZZFTNEXU submitted 2026-03-18 cs.SE cs.AI

classification cs.SEcs.AI
keywords codeverificationdecompositionproofsearchhierarchicalinference-timereward
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) can generate plausible code but offer limited guarantees of correctness. Formally verifying that implementations satisfy specifications requires constructing machine-checkable proofs, a task that remains beyond current automation. We propose a hierarchical proof search framework for automated code verification in Lean~4 that decomposes complex verification goals into structurally simpler subgoals before attempting tactic-level proving. Central to our approach is a principled decomposition score that combines constructive justification with structural effectiveness. The same score serves as both the training reward and the inference-time ranking criterion, aligning optimization and deployment. We train Goedel Code Prover, a single unified policy for both decomposition and completion, through supervised initialization followed by hybrid reinforcement learning, where a continuous decomposition reward supports planning exploration while supervised replay stabilizes proof generation. On three Lean-based code verification benchmarks comprising 427 tasks, our 8B-parameter model achieves a 62.0% prove success rate, a 2.6 improvement over the strongest baseline under the reported inference settings. We further observe consistent inference-time scaling: success rates improve monotonically with search iterations and sampling budget, while whole-proof baselines plateau within the evaluated budgets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. P$^{3}$: Joint Program-and-Proof Planning for Verified Code Generation

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Joint program-and-proof planning improves LLM-backed verified code generation solve rates by 4.6 to 11.2 points across 12 benchmark-model settings.

Pith tools