pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.19509 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-19 · 🧮 math.DS · cond-mat.stat-mech· nlin.CD

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A Mathematical Framework for Linear Response Theory for Nonautonomous Systems

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 07:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.DS cond-mat.stat-mechnlin.CD
keywords linear responsenonautonomous systemstransfer operatorsdynamical systemsmemory lossperturbationsstatistical properties
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nonautonomous systems admit explicit linear response formulas via a global transfer operator on sequence space under rapid memory loss.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a rigorous linear response theory for nonautonomous deterministic and random dynamical systems. It reformulates the time-dependent evolution as a fixed-point problem for a transfer operator acting on measures over an extended sequence space. This produces concrete formulas to predict how small added forcings change the system's time-varying statistical properties. The approach requires sufficiently fast forgetting of initial conditions, extending ideas from autonomous systems. Such theory is relevant for systems like the climate that evolve under time-varying external influences.

Core claim

For a general class of nonautonomous systems with rapid loss of memory, the response to infinitesimal perturbations is given by the derivative of the fixed point of the global transfer operator with respect to the perturbation parameter, yielding explicit response formulas for the time-dependent statistical states.

What carries the argument

A global transfer operator acting on an extended sequence space of measures, which encodes the sequential dynamics as a fixed-point equation to enable differentiation for response.

If this is right

  • Explicit and implementable formulas for the effect of small perturbations on time-dependent measures.
  • Linear response holds for sequential compositions of C^3 expanding maps.
  • Linear response holds for sequential compositions of noisy random maps with uniform positive noise.
  • The theory applies to both deterministic and random nonautonomous systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framework could enable sensitivity analysis in time-dependent climate models by computing responses to additional forcings.
  • Numerical approximation of the transfer operator might allow practical computation of these responses in high-dimensional systems.
  • Extensions to systems with weaker mixing properties could follow by adapting the functional space norms.

Load-bearing premise

The nonautonomous evolution must lose memory of initial conditions at a sufficiently fast rate.

What would settle it

Direct numerical computation of the statistical response in a specific nonautonomous expanding map sequence, checking if it matches the formula derived from the transfer operator derivative; mismatch would falsify.

read the original abstract

Linear Response theory aims to predict how added forcing alters the statistical properties of an unforced system. These kinds of questions have been studied predominantly for autonomous dynamical systems, yet many systems in the physical, natural, and social sciences are inherently nonautonomous, evolving in time under external forcings of various kinds (a canonical example being the climate system). In such settings, one would like to understand how the system's time dependent statistical properties change when additional infinitesimal forcings are applied. This question is of clear practical relevance, but from a rigorous mathematical viewpoint it has been addressed only for a few specific classes of systems/perturbations. Here we provide a rigorous linear response theory for a rather general class of deterministic and random nonautonomous systems satisfying a specific set of assumptions that in some sense extend the standard assumptions used in the autonomous setting. A central ingredient is rapid loss of memory, i.e. sufficiently fast forgetting of initial conditions along the nonautonomous evolution. Our main strategy is to reformulate the sequential dynamics as a fixed-point problem for a global transfer operator acting on an extended sequence space of measures. This yields explicit and readily implementable response formulas for predicting the effect of small perturbations on time-dependent statistical states. We illustrate the theory on two representative classes: sequential compositions of C3 expanding maps and sequential compositions of noisy random maps, where uniform positivity of the noise induces exponential loss of memory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper develops a rigorous linear response theory for a general class of deterministic and random nonautonomous systems under assumptions that extend standard autonomous mixing conditions, with rapid loss of memory as a central ingredient. The main strategy reformulates the sequential dynamics as a fixed-point problem for a global transfer operator acting on an extended sequence space of measures; differentiability of this fixed point (yielding explicit response formulas) is obtained via the implicit function theorem. The theory is illustrated on sequential compositions of C³ expanding maps and on noisy random maps with uniformly positive noise inducing exponential memory loss.

Significance. If the central construction is valid, the work supplies an explicit, implementable framework for linear response in nonautonomous settings that is directly relevant to applications such as climate modeling. The reformulation on sequence space and the derivation of closed-form response expressions constitute a genuine technical advance over existing case-by-case treatments.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract (strategy paragraph) and the fixed-point construction] The implicit-function-theorem step requires the global transfer operator on the infinite product space to be a uniform contraction whose rate is bounded away from 1 independently of the sequence. The stated assumptions only guarantee per-step rapid mixing (C³ expansion or uniform positivity of noise) for each individual map; nothing forces the local contraction rates to be uniformly bounded below 1 across all times. If a subsequence of maps has rates approaching 1, the global operator need not remain a uniform contraction, which would invalidate the IFT application and the claimed explicit response formulas. This uniformity issue is load-bearing for the main theorem.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states that the theory is illustrated on two map classes, yet the provided text contains no error bounds, numerical verification, or explicit statement of the response formulas; adding these would strengthen the manuscript.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for highlighting this key technical requirement for the implicit function theorem application. We address the uniformity concern directly below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract (strategy paragraph) and the fixed-point construction] The implicit-function-theorem step requires the global transfer operator on the infinite product space to be a uniform contraction whose rate is bounded away from 1 independently of the sequence. The stated assumptions only guarantee per-step rapid mixing (C³ expansion or uniform positivity of noise) for each individual map; nothing forces the local contraction rates to be uniformly bounded below 1 across all times. If a subsequence of maps has rates approaching 1, the global operator need not remain a uniform contraction, which would invalidate the IFT application and the claimed explicit response formulas. This uniformity issue is load-bearing for the main theorem.

    Authors: We agree that a uniform bound on the contraction rates is necessary for the global transfer operator to be a contraction with rate independent of the sequence, which is required for the implicit function theorem to yield the stated response formulas. The manuscript's 'rapid loss of memory' condition is intended to capture this, but the assumptions in Section 2 are stated per map without an explicit uniform bound across the sequence. We will revise the main assumptions to require the existence of a uniform rate ρ < 1 such that each individual transfer operator contracts at rate at most ρ (independent of time). This is a natural strengthening that holds in the examples (uniform expansion for the C³ maps and uniform noise positivity), ensures the global operator is a uniform contraction, and validates the IFT step. We will also update the abstract and introduction to make this uniformity explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: derivation rests on explicit assumptions and standard functional-analytic reformulation

full rationale

The paper reformulates nonautonomous dynamics as a fixed-point equation for a global transfer operator on sequence space of measures, then invokes the implicit-function theorem to obtain differentiability of the fixed point (hence linear response formulas) under the standing assumption of sufficiently rapid memory loss. This is a direct mathematical construction from the stated hypotheses (C³ expanding maps or uniformly positive noise inducing exponential forgetting) rather than any self-definition, fitted-parameter renaming, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The assumptions are external to the target response formulas and are not derived from them; the approach therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on domain assumptions of rapid memory loss and a general class of nonautonomous systems; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Rapid loss of memory (sufficiently fast forgetting of initial conditions) along the nonautonomous evolution
    Enables the fixed-point formulation and explicit response formulas.
  • domain assumption Systems belong to a general class of deterministic and random nonautonomous maps satisfying assumptions that extend the autonomous case
    Defines the scope for which the transfer operator approach applies.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5555 in / 1162 out tokens · 60944 ms · 2026-05-15T07:47:39.264442+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 98 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    R. Kubo. The fluctuation-dissipation theorem.Reports on Progress in Physics, 29(1):255–284, 1966

  2. [2]

    Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes

    Ryogo Kubo. Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes. I. Gen- eral theory and simple applications to magnetic and conduction problems. J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 12:570–586, 1957

  3. [3]

    Lucarini, J

    V. Lucarini, J. J. Saarinen, K.-E. Peiponen, and E. M. Vartiainen. Kramers-Kronig relations in Optical Materials Research. Springer, New York, 2005

  4. [4]

    A. J. Turski. Linear response theory of longitudinal plasma excitations. Annalen der Physik, 477(3-4):180–200, 1969

  5. [5]

    Binney and S

    J. Binney and S. Tremaine.Galactic Dynamics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, second edition, 2008

  6. [6]

    Linear response in neuronal networks: from neurons dy- namics to collective response.Chaos, 29(10):103105, 24, 2019

    Bruno Cessac. Linear response in neuronal networks: from neurons dy- namics to collective response.Chaos, 29(10):103105, 24, 2019

  7. [7]

    Lucarini, G

    V. Lucarini, G. A. Pavliotis, and N. Zagli. Response theory and phase transitions for the thermodynamic limit of interacting identical systems. Proc. R. Soc. A, 476(2244):20200688, 2020

  8. [8]

    Zagli, V

    N. Zagli, V. Lucarini, and G. A. Pavliotis. Spectroscopy of phase transitions for multiagent systems.Chaos, 31(6):Paper No. 061103, 8, 2021

  9. [9]

    Stochastic processes: Time evolution, symmetries and linear response.Physics Reports, 88(4):207–319, 1982

    Peter H¨ anggi and Harry Thomas. Stochastic processes: Time evolution, symmetries and linear response.Physics Reports, 88(4):207–319, 1982

  10. [10]

    ¨Ottinger.Beyond Equilibrium Thermodynamics

    H.C. ¨Ottinger.Beyond Equilibrium Thermodynamics. Wiley, Hoboken, 2005

  11. [11]

    Marini Bettolo Marconi, A

    U. Marini Bettolo Marconi, A. Puglisi, L. Rondoni, and A. Vulpiani. Fluctuation-dissipation: Response theory in statistical physics.Phys. Rep., 461:111, 2008. 30

  12. [12]

    An update on the nonequilibrium linear response

    M Baiesi and C Maes. An update on the nonequilibrium linear response. New Journal of Physics, 15(1):013004, jan 2013

  13. [13]

    Fluctuation- dissipation relation for chaotic non-hamiltonian systems.Journal of Sta- tistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2012(04):L04002, apr 2012

    Matteo Colangeli, Lamberto Rondoni, and Angelo Vulpiani. Fluctuation- dissipation relation for chaotic non-hamiltonian systems.Journal of Sta- tistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2012(04):L04002, apr 2012

  14. [14]

    Elements of a unified framework for response formulae.Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Ex- periment, 2014(1):P01002, jan 2014

    Matteo Colangeli and Valerio Lucarini. Elements of a unified framework for response formulae.Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Ex- periment, 2014(1):P01002, jan 2014

  15. [15]

    Predicting climate change using response theory: Global averages and spatial patterns.J

    Valerio Lucarini, Francesco Ragone, and Frank Lunkeit. Predicting climate change using response theory: Global averages and spatial patterns.J. Stat. Phys., 166(3):1036–1064, 2017

  16. [16]

    Chekroun

    Valerio Lucarini and Micka¨ el D. Chekroun. Theoretical tools for under- standing the climate crisis from Hasselmann’s programme and beyond. Nature Reviews Physics, 5(12):744–765, 2023

  17. [17]

    Chekroun

    Valerio Lucarini and Micka¨ el D. Chekroun. Detecting and attributing change in climate and complex systems: Foundations, green’s functions, and nonlinear fingerprints.Phys. Rev. Lett., 133:244201, Dec 2024

  18. [18]

    Gottwald

    Georg A. Gottwald. Introduction to focus issue: Linear response theory: Potentials and limits.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 30(2):020401, 02 2020

  19. [19]

    Differentiation of SRB states.Comm

    David Ruelle. Differentiation of SRB states.Comm. Math. Phys., 187(1):227–241, 1997

  20. [20]

    General linear response formula in statistical mechanics, and the fluctuation-dissipation theorem far from equilibrium.Phys

    David Ruelle. General linear response formula in statistical mechanics, and the fluctuation-dissipation theorem far from equilibrium.Phys. Lett. A, 245(3-4):220–224, 1998

  21. [21]

    D. Ruelle. Nonequilibrium statistical mechanics near equilibrium: comput- ing higher-order terms.Nonlinearity, 11(1):5–18, January 1998

  22. [22]

    D. Ruelle. A review of linear response theory for general differentiable dynamical systems.Nonlinearity, 22(4):855–870, April 2009

  23. [23]

    Abramov and A.J

    R.V. Abramov and A.J. Majda. Blended response algorithms for linear fluctuation-dissipation for complex nonlinear dynamical systems.Nonlin- earity, 20(12):2793, 2007

  24. [24]

    Forward and adjoint sensitivity computation of chaotic dynam- ical systems.Journal of Computational Physics, 235(0):1 – 13, 2013

    Qiqi Wang. Forward and adjoint sensitivity computation of chaotic dynam- ical systems.Journal of Computational Physics, 235(0):1 – 13, 2013

  25. [25]

    A computable realization of Ru- elle’s formula for linear response of statistics in chaotic systems.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2002.04117, February 2020

    Nisha Chandramoorthy and Qiqi Wang. A computable realization of Ru- elle’s formula for linear response of statistics in chaotic systems.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2002.04117, February 2020. 31

  26. [26]

    Approximating linear response by nonintrusive shadowing al- gorithms.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 59(6):2843–2865, 2021

    Angxiu Ni. Approximating linear response by nonintrusive shadowing al- gorithms.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 59(6):2843–2865, 2021

  27. [27]

    Efficient computation of linear response of chaotic attractors with one-dimensional unstable manifolds

    Nisha Chandramoorthy and Qiqi Wang. Efficient computation of linear response of chaotic attractors with one-dimensional unstable manifolds. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 21(2):735–781, 2022

  28. [28]

    Fast adjoint algorithm for linear responses of hyperbolic chaos

    Angxiu Ni. Fast adjoint algorithm for linear responses of hyperbolic chaos. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 22(4):2792–2824, 2023

  29. [29]

    Fast differentiation of hyperbolic chaos.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 250(1), 2026

    Angxiu Ni. Fast differentiation of hyperbolic chaos.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 250(1), 2026. Published online: 17 Dec 2025

  30. [30]

    On differentiability of srb states for partially hyperbolic systems.Inventiones mathematicae, 155(2):389–449, 2004

    Dmitry Dolgopyat. On differentiability of srb states for partially hyperbolic systems.Inventiones mathematicae, 155(2):389–449, 2004

  31. [31]

    Liverani and S

    C. Liverani and S. Gou¨ ezel. Banach spaces adapted to Anosov systems. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, 26:189–217, 2006

  32. [32]

    Smooth Anosov flows: Corre- lation spectra and stability.Journal of Modern Dynamics, 1(2):301–322, 2007

    Oliver Butterley and Carlangelo Liverani. Smooth Anosov flows: Corre- lation spectra and stability.Journal of Modern Dynamics, 1(2):301–322, 2007

  33. [33]

    Linear response despite critical points.Nonlinearity, 21(6):T81, 2008

    Viviane Baladi. Linear response despite critical points.Nonlinearity, 21(6):T81, 2008

  34. [34]

    Linear response for intermittent maps

    Viviane Baladi and Mike Todd. Linear response for intermittent maps. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 347(3):857–874, 2016. Pub- lished online: 2016-11-01

  35. [35]

    Linear response for intermittent maps with summable and nonsummable decay of correlations.Nonlinearity, 29(6):1735, may 2016

    Alexey Korepanov. Linear response for intermittent maps with summable and nonsummable decay of correlations.Nonlinearity, 29(6):1735, may 2016

  36. [36]

    Galatolo

    S. Galatolo. Self-consistent transfer operators: Invariant measures, conver- gence to equilibrium, linear response and control of the statistical proper- ties.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 395:715–772, 2022

  37. [37]

    F. M. S´ elley and M. Tanzi. Linear response for a family of self-consistent transfer operators.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 382:1601– 1624, 2021

  38. [38]

    Linear response due to singularities

    Wael Bahsoun and Stefano Galatolo. Linear response due to singularities. Nonlinearity, 37(7):075010, may 2024

  39. [39]

    Linear response formula for piecewise expanding unimodal maps.Nonlinearity, 21(4):677, feb 2008

    Viviane Baladi and Daniel Smania. Linear response formula for piecewise expanding unimodal maps.Nonlinearity, 21(4):677, feb 2008

  40. [40]

    Baladi.Positive Transfer Operators and Decay of Correlations

    V. Baladi.Positive Transfer Operators and Decay of Correlations. World Scientific, Singapore, 2000. 32

  41. [41]

    Linear response and periodic points.Nonlin- earity, 29(10):3047, aug 2016

    M Pollicott and P Vytnova. Linear response and periodic points.Nonlin- earity, 29(10):3047, aug 2016

  42. [42]

    Optimal linear response for anosov diffeomorphisms

    Gary Froyland and Maxence Phalempin. Optimal linear response for anosov diffeomorphisms. arXiv preprint, April 2025. Submitted 23 Apr 2025; last revised 28 Nov 2025 (v2)

  43. [43]

    A rigorous computational approach to linear response.Nonlinearity, 31(3):1073, feb 2018

    Wael Bahsoun, Stefano Galatolo, Isaia Nisoli, and Xiaolong Niu. A rigorous computational approach to linear response.Nonlinearity, 31(3):1073, feb 2018

  44. [44]

    Hairer and A

    M. Hairer and A. J. Majda. A simple framework to justify linear response theory.Nonlinearity, 23(4):909–922, 2010

  45. [45]

    Dembo and J.-D

    A. Dembo and J.-D. Deuschel. Markovian perturbation, response and fluctuation dissipation theorem.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat., 46(3):822–852, 2010

  46. [46]

    Pavliotis.Stochastic Processes and Applications, volume 60

    Grigorios A. Pavliotis.Stochastic Processes and Applications, volume 60. Springer, New York, 2014

  47. [47]

    A linear response for dynamical systems with additive noise.Nonlinearity, 32(6):2269, may 2019

    S Galatolo and P Giulietti. A linear response for dynamical systems with additive noise.Nonlinearity, 32(6):2269, may 2019

  48. [48]

    Linear response for random dynamical systems.Advances in Mathematics, 364:107011, 2020

    Wael Bahsoun, Marks Ruziboev, and Benoˆ ıt Saussol. Linear response for random dynamical systems.Advances in Mathematics, 364:107011, 2020

  49. [49]

    Quadratic response of random and deterministic dynamical systems.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 30(2):023113, 02 2020

    Stefano Galatolo and Julien Sedro. Quadratic response of random and deterministic dynamical systems.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 30(2):023113, 02 2020

  50. [50]

    Quenched linear re- sponse for smooth expanding on average cocycles.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 399(1):423–452, Apr 2023

    Davor Dragiˇ cevi´ c, Paolo Giulietti, and Julien Sedro. Quenched linear re- sponse for smooth expanding on average cocycles.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 399(1):423–452, Apr 2023

  51. [51]

    Statistical stability and linear response for random hyperbolic dynamics.Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, 43(2):515–544, 2023

    Davor Dragiˇ cevi´ c and Julien Sedro. Statistical stability and linear response for random hyperbolic dynamics.Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, 43(2):515–544, 2023. Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 Dec 2021

  52. [52]

    Linear re- sponse for random and sequential intermittent maps.Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 111(4):e70150, 2025

    Davor Dragiˇ cevi´ c, Cecilia Gonz´ alez-Tokman, and Julien Sedro. Linear re- sponse for random and sequential intermittent maps.Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 111(4):e70150, 2025

  53. [53]

    Kartashov

    M.V. Kartashov. The stability of almost homogeneous in time markov semi- groups of operators.Teoriya Jmovirnostej ta Matematychna Statystyka, 71, 01 2005

  54. [54]

    Lucarini

    V. Lucarini. Response operators for Markov processes in a finite state space: Radius of convergence and link to the response theory for Axiom A systems.Journal of Statistical Physics, 162(2):312–333, January 2016. 33

  55. [55]

    Optimal linear re- sponses for markov chains and stochastically perturbed dynamical systems

    Fadi Antown, Davor Dragiˇ cevi´ c, and Gary Froyland. Optimal linear re- sponses for markov chains and stochastically perturbed dynamical systems. Journal of Statistical Physics, 170(6):1051–1087, 2018

  56. [56]

    Response and sensitivity us- ing markov chains.Journal of Statistical Physics, 179(5):1572–1593, 2020

    Manuel Santos Guti´ errez and Valerio Lucarini. Response and sensitivity us- ing markov chains.Journal of Statistical Physics, 179(5):1572–1593, 2020

  57. [57]

    Interpretable and equation-free response theory for com- plex systems.Phil

    Valerio Lucarini. Interpretable and equation-free response theory for com- plex systems.Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A, 2025

  58. [58]

    V. S. Pande, K. Beauchamp, and G. R. Bowman. Everything you wanted to know about Markov State Models but were afraid to ask.Methods, 52(1):99–105, 2010

  59. [59]

    Husic and Vijay S

    Brooke E. Husic and Vijay S. Pande. Markov state models: From an art to a science.Journal of the American Chemical Society, 140(7):2386–2396,

  60. [60]

    doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b12191

  61. [61]

    Applied Koopmanism.Chaos, 22(4):047510, 33, 2012

    Marko Budiˇ si´ c, Ryan Mohr, and Igor Mezi´ c. Applied Koopmanism.Chaos, 22(4):047510, 33, 2012

  62. [62]

    Nathan Kutz, Steven L

    J. Nathan Kutz, Steven L. Brunton, Bingni W. Brunton, and Joshua L. Proctor.Dynamic Mode Decomposition. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 2016

  63. [63]

    Brunton, Marko Budiˇ si´ c, Eurika Kaiser, and J

    Steven L. Brunton, Marko Budiˇ si´ c, Eurika Kaiser, and J. Nathan Kutz. Modern Koopman Theory for Dynamical Systems.SIAM Review, 64(2):229–340, 2022

  64. [64]

    Colbrook, Igor Mezi´ c, and Alexei Stepanenko

    Matthew J. Colbrook, Igor Mezi´ c, and Alexei Stepanenko. Limits and Powers of Koopman Learning, 2024

  65. [65]

    On some aspects of the response to stochastic and deterministic forcings.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 55(42):425002, oct 2022

    Manuel Santos Guti´ errez and Valerio Lucarini. On some aspects of the response to stochastic and deterministic forcings.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 55(42):425002, oct 2022

  66. [66]

    A general framework for linking free and forced fluctuations via koopmanism.Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 202:117540, 2026

    Valerio Lucarini, Manuel Santos Guti´ errez, John Moroney, and Niccol` o Zagli. A general framework for linking free and forced fluctuations via koopmanism.Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 202:117540, 2026

  67. [67]

    Bridging the gap between koopmanism and response theory: Using natural variability to predict forced response.SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 25(1):196–229, 2026

    Niccol` o Zagli, Matthew J Colbrook, Valerio Lucarini, Igor Mezi´ c, and John Moroney. Bridging the gap between koopmanism and response theory: Using natural variability to predict forced response.SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 25(1):196–229, 2026

  68. [68]

    Giorgini, Katherine Deck, Tobias Bischoff, and Andre N

    Ludovico T. Giorgini, Katherine Deck, Tobias Bischoff, and Andre N. Souza. Response theory via generative score modeling.Physical Review Letters, 133(26):267302, 2024. 34

  69. [69]

    Giorgini, Tobias Bischoff, and Andre N

    Ludovico T. Giorgini, Tobias Bischoff, and Andre N. Souza. Statistical parameter calibration with the generalized fluctuation–dissipation theorem and generative modeling, 2025. arXiv:2509.19660

  70. [70]

    Giorgini, Fabrizio Falasca, and Andre N

    Ludovico T. Giorgini, Fabrizio Falasca, and Andre N. Souza. Predicting forced responses of probability distributions via the fluctuation–dissipation theorem and generative modeling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(41):e2509578122, 2025

  71. [71]

    Chekroun, and Michael Ghil

    Manuel Santos Guti´ errez, Valerio Lucarini, Micka¨ el D. Chekroun, and Michael Ghil. Reduced-order models for coupled dynamical systems: Data- driven methods and the koopman operator.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 31(5):053116, 2021

  72. [72]

    Saltzman.Dynamical Paleoclimatology: Generalized Theory of Global Climate Change

    B. Saltzman.Dynamical Paleoclimatology: Generalized Theory of Global Climate Change. Academic Press New York, New York, November 2001

  73. [73]

    Violation of the fluctuation–dissipation theorem in glassy systems: basic notions and the numerical evidence.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 36(21):R181, may 2003

    A Crisanti and F Ritort. Violation of the fluctuation–dissipation theorem in glassy systems: basic notions and the numerical evidence.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 36(21):R181, may 2003

  74. [74]

    Efficient measurement of linear susceptibilities in molecu- lar simulations: Application to aging supercooled liquids.Phys

    Ludovic Berthier. Efficient measurement of linear susceptibilities in molecu- lar simulations: Application to aging supercooled liquids.Phys. Rev. Lett., 98:220601, May 2007

  75. [75]

    Micha l Branicki and Kenneth Uda. Time-periodic measures, random peri- odic orbits, and the linear response for dissipative non-autonomous stochas- tic differential equations.Research in the Mathematical Sciences, 8(3):42, 2021

  76. [76]

    Linear Response and Optimal Fingerprinting for Nonautonomous Systems

    Valerio Lucarini. Linear response and optimal fingerprinting for nonau- tonomous systems. ArXiv:2602.08022, 2026

  77. [77]

    W. D. Sellers. A global climatic model based on the energy balance of the earth atmosphere.J. Appl. Meteorol., 8:392–400, 1969

  78. [78]

    M. Ghil. Climate stability for a Sellers-type model.J. Atmos. Sci., 33:3–20, 1976

  79. [79]

    Global instability in the ghil–sellers model.Climate Dynamics, 44(11-12):3361– 3381, 2015

    Tam´ as B´ odai, Valerio Lucarini, Frank Lunkeit, and Robert Boschi. Global instability in the ghil–sellers model.Climate Dynamics, 44(11-12):3361– 3381, 2015

  80. [80]

    Random attractors

    Hans Crauel, Arnaud Debussche, and Franco Flandoli. Random attractors. Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations, 9:307–341, 04 1997

Showing first 80 references.