Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

DynFlowDrive: Flow-Based Dynamic World Modeling for Autonomous Driving

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-15 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read DynFlowDrive learns a velocity field via rectified flow to predict how driving actions evolve latent scene states, supporting stability-based trajectory selection.

desk verdict DynFlowDrive adapts rectified flows to latent world models for action-conditioned driving prediction and reports benchmark gains via stability-based selection. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.19675 v2 submitted 2026-03-20 cs.CV cs.RO

Xiaolu Liu , Yicong Li , Song Wang , Junbo Chen , Angela Yao , Jianke Zhu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.RO
keywords autonomousdrivingworldmodelsrectifiedflowlatentdynamicstrajectoryselectionsceneevolutionstability-awareplanning
checked against Cost.FunctionalEquationFoundation.ArrowOfTime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents a latent world model that replaces appearance generation and deterministic regression with flow-based dynamics for autonomous driving. It trains a velocity field that describes continuous changes in scene states conditioned on different actions, allowing the model to integrate forward step by step to forecast future states. This formulation supports a new selection method that ranks candidate trajectories by how stable the resulting transitions appear in latent space. The approach is shown to improve planning reliability on standard driving benchmarks while adding no inference cost. A sympathetic reader would care because unreliable future-state prediction has been a persistent barrier to safe action planning in real-world driving systems.

What carries the argument

The rectified flow velocity field in latent space that models continuous, action-conditioned transitions between world states.

What would settle it

If integrating the learned velocity field from an observed initial state under a known action produces latent predictions that deviate substantially from the actual future states recorded in held-out driving sequences, the central modeling claim would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

By adopting the rectified flow formulation, the model learns a velocity field that describes how the scene state changes under different driving actions, enabling progressive prediction of future latent states. Building on this, the method adds a stability-aware multi-mode trajectory selection strategy that evaluates candidates according to the stability of the induced scene transitions, yielding consistent gains across driving frameworks on the nuScenes and NavSim benchmarks.

Load-bearing premise

The velocity field learned in latent space accurately captures how real scenes evolve under driving actions and that the stability of those transitions reliably indicates safe planning choices.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Future states can be predicted progressively by integrating along the learned velocity field instead of generating appearances or regressing deterministically.
  • Trajectory selection becomes possible by measuring the stability of the scene transitions each candidate action would induce.
  • The same model can be plugged into existing driving frameworks to improve reliability without increasing inference time.
  • Action-conditioned evolution is captured directly in the latent dynamics rather than through separate generation steps.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same velocity-field approach could be tested on other sequential control tasks where state transitions depend on chosen actions.
  • If the latent space preserves enough scene structure, the stability metric might be extended to incorporate uncertainty estimates from the flow itself.
  • Online fine-tuning of the velocity field using new sensor data could allow the model to adapt to changing environments without retraining from scratch.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents DynFlowDrive, a latent world model for autonomous driving that adopts the rectified flow formulation to learn a velocity field describing action-conditioned scene state transitions. This enables progressive prediction of future latent states via ODE integration. A stability-aware multi-mode trajectory selection strategy is proposed that scores candidate trajectories by the integrated norm of the induced velocity field. Experiments on nuScenes and NavSim benchmarks report consistent improvements over prior world-model and planning baselines without added inference cost.

Significance. If the empirical gains and ablations hold under rigorous scrutiny, the work offers a principled continuous-dynamics alternative to deterministic regression or generative world models, potentially improving trajectory-conditioned prediction reliability for planning. The stability metric provides a concrete, if empirical, link between flow-field properties and planning safety.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experiments] Experiments section: the central claim of consistent improvements rests on quantitative results, yet the manuscript provides insufficient detail on data splits, number of runs, error bars, and exact metric values for the nuScenes and NavSim evaluations, preventing verification that gains are robust rather than post-hoc.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2 (Stability-aware Trajectory Selection): the stability metric is defined as the integrated norm of the velocity field along the predicted path, but no analysis is given of its sensitivity to integration step count, norm choice, or latent-space scaling; this directly affects whether the metric reliably proxies safe planning.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: typo 'abaliable' should be 'available'.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and §2: 'rectifiedflow' should be hyphenated or spaced as 'rectified flow' to match standard terminology in the flow-matching literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary and constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of results and analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experiments] Experiments section: the central claim of consistent improvements rests on quantitative results, yet the manuscript provides insufficient detail on data splits, number of runs, error bars, and exact metric values for the nuScenes and NavSim evaluations, preventing verification that gains are robust rather than post-hoc.

    Authors: We agree that additional details are required for reproducibility and verification. In the revised manuscript we will expand the Experiments section to explicitly describe the train/validation/test splits for both nuScenes and NavSim, state that all quantitative results are averaged over five independent runs with different random seeds, include error bars (standard deviation) in all tables and figures, and report the precise numerical values (rather than only relative gains) for every metric. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (Stability-aware Trajectory Selection): the stability metric is defined as the integrated norm of the velocity field along the predicted path, but no analysis is given of its sensitivity to integration step count, norm choice, or latent-space scaling; this directly affects whether the metric reliably proxies safe planning.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript does not contain sensitivity analysis for the stability metric. In the revision we will add a dedicated paragraph (and, if space permits, a small table or plot in the appendix) that examines the effect of varying the number of ODE integration steps, the choice of norm (L1 versus L2), and different latent-space scaling factors on the ranking of candidate trajectories. This will provide evidence that the metric remains stable under reasonable hyper-parameter choices. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper adopts the standard rectified-flow formulation to learn a velocity field in latent space conditioned on driving actions and trajectories; this is trained directly from data rather than defined by construction to equal its own outputs. The stability metric is introduced as the integrated norm of the predicted velocity field along candidate paths, which is a downstream computation and does not reduce the core prediction to a fitted input. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes imported from prior author work are used to justify the central modeling choice. The claimed gains are presented as empirical results on nuScenes and NavSim benchmarks, leaving the derivation self-contained against external validation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The rectified-flow velocity field is learned from data rather than postulated as a new entity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of DynFlowDrive: Flow-Based Dynamic World Modeling for Autonomous Driving." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2603.19675

@misc{pith2026260319675,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: DynFlowDrive: Flow-Based Dynamic World Modeling for Autonomous Driving},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2603.19675}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.19675}
}
read the original abstract

Recently, world models have been incorporated into the autonomous driving systems to improve the planning reliability. Existing approaches typically predict future states through appearance generation or deterministic regression, which limits their ability to capture trajectory-conditioned scene evolution and leads to unreliable action planning. To address this, we propose DynFlowDrive, a latent world model that leverages flow-based dynamics to model the transition of world states under different driving actions. By adopting the rectifiedflow formulation, the model learns a velocity field that describes how the scene state changes under different driving actions, enabling progressive prediction of future latent states. Building upon this, we further introduce a stability-aware multi-mode trajectory selection strategy that evaluates candidate trajectories according to the stability of the induced scene transitions. Extensive experiments on the nuScenes and NavSim benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements across diverse driving frameworks without introducing additional inference overhead. Source code will be abaliable at https://github.com/xiaolul2/DynFlowDrive.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.19675 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Comparisons of perception-based and latent world model-based approaches on nuScenes and NavSim benchmarks. (b) Planning visualization on the front view and bird’s-eye-view (BEV) space. Our DynFlowDrive achieves comparable performance. Abstract. Recently, world models have been incorporated into the au￾tonomous driving systems to improve the planning reliability. Existing approaches typically predict future state… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison between (a) the existing static world model and (b) the dy￾namic latent world model of our DynFlowDrive. Instead of the static regression of next-frame latents, we propose the dynamic modeling that learns a continuous ve￾locity field vθ to capture the evolution of world transitions. trajectories. The learned velocity field explicitly captures the rate of change of the scene during state transitions, enabl… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of DynFlowDrive. Given current observations, multi-mode tra￾jectories are firstly generated by the standard planning module. A flow-based dynamic latent world model is incorporated to simulate the progressive future evolution in la￾tent space. The resulting dynamics are used by a stability-aware multi-mode selection module, which assess the trajectory based on reconstruction quality and flow-based stability… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The architecture of our dynamic latent world model design, in which the velocity field vθ is learnt to capture the trajectory-conditioned dynamics transitions in the latent space. Flow-based Latent World Model Simulation. Given the current world latent z˜ w t and predi…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Stability-aware Multi￾mode Selection. For training, the score head is supervised by the stable criterion. For In￾ference, the best mode trajec￾tory is selected according to the highest score index. Our multi-modal trajectory predictor generates a set of candidate traje…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Visualization of Planning Results on nuScenese dataset. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TPS-Drive: Task-Guided Representation Purification for VLM-based Autonomous Driving

    cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    TPS-Drive uses an agent-centric tokenizer supervised by a frozen 3D detection head to purify VLM spatial representations, enabling better scene forecasting and lower collision rates on nuScenes and NAVSIM benchmarks.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    In: IJCAI

    Allen, J.F., Koomen, J.A.: Planning using a temporal world model. In: IJCAI. pp. 741–747 (1983) 2

    work page 1983

  2. [2]

    In: CVPR

    Caesar, H., Bankiti, V., Lang, A.H., Vora, S., Liong, V.E., Xu, Q., Krishnan, A., Pan, Y., Baldan, G., Beijbom, O.: nuscenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving. In: CVPR. pp. 11621–11631 (2020) 3, 9, 10

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    IEEE TPAMI (2024) 2

    Chen, L., Wu, P., Chitta, K., Jaeger, B., Geiger, A., Li, H.: End-to-end autonomous driving: Challenges and frontiers. IEEE TPAMI (2024) 2

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    VADv2: End-to-End Vectorized Autonomous Driving via Probabilistic Planning

    Chen,S.,Jiang,B.,Gao,H.,Liao,B.,Xu,Q.,Zhang,Q.,Huang,C.,Liu,W.,Wang, X.: Vadv2: End-to-end vectorized autonomous driving via probabilistic planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13243 (2024) 2, 13

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research44(10-11), 1684–1704 (2025) 4

    Chi,C.,Xu,Z.,Feng,S.,Cousineau,E.,Du,Y.,Burchfiel,B.,Tedrake,R.,Song,S.: Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion. The International Journal of Robotics Research44(10-11), 1684–1704 (2025) 4

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Impromptu VLA: Open Weights and Open Data for Driving Vision-Language-Action Models

    Chi, H., Gao, H.a., Liu, Z., Liu, J., Liu, C., Li, J., Yang, K., Yu, Y., Wang, Z., Li, W., et al.: Impromptu vla: Open weights and open data for driving vision- language-action models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23757 (2025) 4

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    TIV9(1), 103–118 (2023) 2

    Chib,P.S.,Singh,P.:Recentadvancementsinend-to-endautonomousdrivingusing deep learning: A survey. TIV9(1), 103–118 (2023) 2

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    IEEE TPAMI 45(11), 12878–12895 (2022) 13

    Chitta, K., Prakash, A., Jaeger, B., Yu, Z., Renz, K., Geiger, A.: Transfuser: Imi- tation with transformer-based sensor fusion for autonomous driving. IEEE TPAMI 45(11), 12878–12895 (2022) 13

    work page 2022

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    In: NeurIPS (2024) 3, 9, 11

    Dauner, D., Hallgarten, M., Li, T., Weng, X., Huang, Z., Yang, Z., Li, H., Gilitschenski, I., Ivanovic, B., Pavone, M., et al.: Navsim: Data-driven non-reactive autonomous vehicle simulation and benchmarking. In: NeurIPS (2024) 3, 9, 11

    2024

  2. [10]

    IEEE Internet of Things Journal13(3), 3870–3898 (2025) 2

    Dong, W., Lu, S., Chen, X., Zhang, S., Liu, Q., Liu, Z., Chen, L., Wang, H., Cai, Y.: End-to-end autonomous driving: From classic paradigm to large model empowerment—a comprehensive survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal13(3), 3870–3898 (2025) 2

    2025

  3. [11]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13144 (2025) 4

    Gao, H., Chen, S., Jiang, B., Liao, B., Shi, Y., Guo, X., Pu, Y., Yin, H., Li, X., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, W., Zhang, Q., Wang, X.: Rad: Training an end-to-end driving policy via large-scale 3dgs-based reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13144 (2025) 4

    2025

  4. [12]

    In: ICLR (2024) 2

    Gao, R., Chen, K., Xie, E., Hong, L., Li, Z., Yeung, D.Y., Xu, Q.: Magicdrive: Street view generation with diverse 3d geometry control. In: ICLR (2024) 2

    2024

  5. [13]

    TITS17(4), 1135–1145 (2015) 4

    González, D., Pérez, J., Milanés, V., Nashashibi, F.: A review of motion planning techniques for automated vehicles. TITS17(4), 1135–1145 (2015) 4

    2015

  6. [14]

    TIV (2024) 2, 4

    Guan, Y., Liao, H., Li, Z., Hu, J., Yuan, R., Zhang, G., Xu, C.: World models for autonomous driving: An initial survey. TIV (2024) 2, 4

    2024

  7. [15]

    In: CVPR

    He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: CVPR. pp. 770–778 (2016) 10, 11

    2016

  8. [16]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.17080 (2023) 2

    Hu, A., Russell, L., Yeo, H., Murez, Z., Fedoseev, G., Kendall, A., Shotton, J., Corrado, G.: Gaia-1: A generative world model for autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.17080 (2023) 2

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    In: ECCV

    Hu, S., Chen, L., Wu, P., Li, H., Yan, J., Tao, D.: St-p3: End-to-end vision-based autonomous driving via spatial-temporal feature learning. In: ECCV. pp. 533–549. Springer (2022) 4, 11

    2022

  10. [18]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16760 (2025) 2 16 X

    Hu, T., Liu, X., Wang, S., Zhu, Y., Liang, A., Kong, L., Zhao, G., Gong, Z., Cen, J., Huang, Z., et al.: Vision-language-action models for autonomous driving: Past, present, and future. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16760 (2025) 2 16 X. Liu et al

    2025

  11. [19]

    In: CVPR

    Hu, Y., Yang, J., Chen, L., Li, K., Sima, C., Zhu, X., Chai, S., Du, S., Lin, T., Wang, W., et al.: Planning-oriented autonomous driving. In: CVPR. pp. 17853– 17862 (2023) 4, 6, 10, 11, 13

    2023

  12. [20]

    In: ICCV

    Jiang, B., Chen, S., Xu, Q., Liao, B., Chen, J., Zhou, H., Zhang, Q., Liu, W., Huang,C.,Wang,X.:Vad:Vectorizedscenerepresentationforefficientautonomous driving. In: ICCV. pp. 8340–8350 (2023) 4, 6, 10, 11

    2023

  13. [21]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.09158 (2025) 4

    Jiao, S., Qian, K., Ye, H., Zhong, Y., Luo, Z., Jiang, S., Huang, Z., Fang, Y., Miao, J., Fu, Z., et al.: Evadrive: Evolutionary adversarial policy optimization for end-to-end autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.09158 (2025) 4

    2025

  14. [22]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.07996 (2025) 2, 4

    Kong, L., Yang, W., Mei, J., Liu, Y., Liang, A., Zhu, D., Lu, D., Yin, W., Hu, X., Jia, M., et al.: 3d and 4d world modeling: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.07996 (2025) 2, 4

    2025

  15. [23]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.18341 (2024) 3, 4, 6, 10, 11

    Li, P., Cui, D.: Navigation-guided sparse scene representation for end-to-end au- tonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.18341 (2024) 3, 4, 6, 10, 11

    2024

  16. [24]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08481 (2024) 2, 4, 6, 10, 11, 13

    Li, Y., Fan, L., He, J., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., Tan, T.: Enhancing end-to- end autonomous driving with latent world model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08481 (2024) 2, 4, 6, 10, 11, 13

    2024

  17. [25]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.01941 (2025) 4, 10, 11, 13

    Li, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., He, J., Fan, L., Zhang, Z.: End-to-end driving with online trajectory evaluation via bev world model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.01941 (2025) 4, 10, 11, 13

    2025

  18. [26]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.08052 (2025) 4

    Li, Y., Xiong, K., Guo, X., Li, F., Yan, S., Xu, G., Zhou, L., Chen, L., Sun, H., Wang, B., et al.: Recogdrive: A reinforced cognitive framework for end-to-end autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.08052 (2025) 4

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.18234 (2025) 4

    Li, Y., Tian, M., Zhu, D., Zhu, J., Lin, Z., Xiong, Z., Zhao, X.: Drive-r1: Bridg- ing reasoning and planning in vlms for autonomous driving with reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.18234 (2025) 4

    2025

  20. [28]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06978 (2024) 13

    Li, Z., Li, K., Wang, S., Lan, S., Yu, Z., Ji, Y., Li, Z., Zhu, Z., Kautz, J., Wu, Z., et al.: Hydra-mdp: End-to-end multimodal planning with multi-target hydra- distillation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06978 (2024) 13

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    IEEE TPAMI (2024) 3

    Li, Z., Wang, W., Li, H., Xie, E., Sima, C., Lu, T., Yu, Q., Dai, J.: Bevformer: learningbird’s-eye-viewrepresentationfromlidar-cameraviaspatiotemporaltrans- formers. IEEE TPAMI (2024) 3

    2024

  22. [30]

    Li, Z., Yu, Z., Lan, S., Li, J., Kautz, J., Lu, T., Alvarez, J.M.: Is ego status all you need for open-loop end-to-end autonomous driving? In: CVPR (2024) 4, 10, 11

    2024

  23. [31]

    In: CVPR

    Liao, B., Chen, S., Yin, H., Jiang, B., Wang, C., Yan, S., Zhang, X., Li, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Q., et al.: Diffusiondrive: Truncated diffusion model for end-to-end autonomous driving. In: CVPR. pp. 12037–12047 (2025) 4, 11, 13

    2025

  24. [32]

    TITS22(1), 341–355 (2019) 4

    Lim, W., Lee, S., Sunwoo, M., Jo, K.: Hybrid trajectory planning for autonomous driving in on-road dynamic scenarios. TITS22(1), 341–355 (2019) 4

    2019

  25. [33]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02747 (2022) 4

    Lipman, Y., Chen, R.T., Ben-Hamu, H., Nickel, M., Le, M.: Flow matching for generative modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02747 (2022) 4

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    In: ROBIO

    Liu, J., Mao, X., Fang, Y., Zhu, D., Meng, M.Q.H.: A survey on deep-learning approaches for vehicle trajectory prediction in autonomous driving. In: ROBIO. pp. 978–985. IEEE (2021) 4

    2021

  27. [35]

    In: CVPR

    Liu, X., Wang, S., Li, W., Yang, R., Chen, J., Zhu, J.: Mgmap: Mask-guided learning for online vectorized hd map construction. In: CVPR. pp. 14812–14821 (2024) 3

    2024

  28. [36]

    In: CVPR

    Liu, X., Yang, R., Wang, S., Li, W., Chen, J., Zhu, J.: Uncertainty-instructed structure injection for generalizable hd map construction. In: CVPR. pp. 22359– 22368 (2025) 3 DynFlowDrive 17

    2025

  29. [37]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.03003 (2022) 7

    Liu, X., Gong, C., Liu, Q.: Flow straight and fast: Learning to generate and transfer data with rectified flow. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.03003 (2022) 7

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    In: ICCV

    Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., Guo, B.: Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. In: ICCV. pp. 10012–10022 (2021) 11

    2021

  31. [39]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101 (2017) 10

    Loshchilov, I., Hutter, F.: Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101 (2017) 10

    2017 arXiv

  32. [40]

    In: ICLR (2024) 2

    Podell, D., English, Z., Lacey, K., Blattmann, A., Dockhorn, T., Müller, J., Penna, J., Rombach, R.: Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis. In: ICLR (2024) 2

    2024

  33. [41]

    In: CVPR

    Prakash, A., Chitta, K., Geiger, A.: Multi-modal fusion transformer for end-to-end autonomous driving. In: CVPR. pp. 7077–7087 (2021) 13

    2021

  34. [42]

    In: ECCV

    Song, H., Ding, W., Chen, Y., Shen, S., Wang, M.Y., Chen, Q.: Pip: Planning- informed trajectory prediction for autonomous driving. In: ECCV. pp. 598–614. Springer (2020) 4

    2020

  35. [43]

    In: CVPR

    Song, Z., Jia, C., Liu, L., Pan, H., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Zhang, X., Xu, S., Yang, L., Luo, Y.: Don’t shake the wheel: Momentum-aware planning in end-to-end au- tonomous driving. In: CVPR. pp. 22432–22441 (2025) 11

    2025

  36. [44]

    In: ICRA

    Sun, W., Lin, X., Shi, Y., Zhang, C., Wu, H., Zheng, S.: Sparsedrive: End-to- end autonomous driving via sparse scene representation. In: ICRA. pp. 8795–8801. IEEE (2025) 4, 11

    2025

  37. [45]

    In: ICCV

    Wang, S., Liu, Y., Wang, T., Li, Y., Zhang, X.: Exploring object-centric temporal modeling for efficient multi-view 3d object detection. In: ICCV. pp. 3621–3631 (2023) 3

    2023

  38. [46]

    In: CVPR

    Wang, S., Yu, J., Li, W., Liu, W., Liu, X., Chen, J., Zhu, J.: Not all voxels are equal: Hardness-aware semantic scene completion with self-distillation. In: CVPR. pp. 14792–14801 (2024) 3

    2024

  39. [47]

    In: ECCV

    Wang, X., Zhu, Z., Huang, G., Chen, X., Zhu, J., Lu, J.: Drivedreamer: Towards real-world-drive world models for autonomous driving. In: ECCV. pp. 55–72 (2024) 2

    2024

  40. [48]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.24381 (2025) 4

    Wang, Y., Huang, X., Sun, X., Yan, M., Xing, S., Tu, Z., Li, J.: Uniocc: A unified benchmark for occupancy forecasting and prediction in autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.24381 (2025) 4

    2025

  41. [49]

    In: CVPR

    Wang, Y., He, J., Fan, L., Li, H., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z.: Driving into the future: Mul- tiview visual forecasting and planning with world model for autonomous driving. In: CVPR. pp. 14749–14759 (2024) 2, 4

    2024

  42. [50]

    In: CVPR

    Weng, X., Ivanovic, B., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Pavone, M.: Para-drive: Parallelized architecture for real-time autonomous driving. In: CVPR. pp. 15449–15458 (2024) 2, 11, 13

    2024

  43. [51]

    In: ITSC

    Xin, L., Wang, P., Chan, C.Y., Chen, J., Li, S.E., Cheng, B.: Intention-aware long horizon trajectory prediction of surrounding vehicles using dual lstm networks. In: ITSC. pp. 1441–1446. IEEE (2018) 4

    2018

  44. [52]

    In: CVPR

    Xing, Z., Zhang, X., Hu, Y., Jiang, B., He, T., Zhang, Q., Long, X., Yin, W.: Goalflow: Goal-driven flow matching for multimodal trajectories generation in end- to-end autonomous driving. In: CVPR. pp. 1602–1611 (2025) 4

    2025

  45. [53]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.20325 (2025) 4 18 X

    Yan, T., Tang, T., Gui, X., Li, Y., Zhesng, J., Huang, W., Kong, L., Han, W., Zhou, X., Zhang, X., et al.: Ad-r1: Closed-loop reinforcement learning for end-to-end autonomous driving with impartial world models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.20325 (2025) 4 18 X. Liu et al

    2025

  46. [54]

    In: CVPR

    Yang, J., Gao, S., Qiu, Y., Chen, L., Li, T., Dai, B., Chitta, K., Wu, P., Zeng, J., Luo, P., et al.: Generalized predictive model for autonomous driving. In: CVPR. pp. 14662–14672 (2024) 4

    2024

  47. [55]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.19133 (2025) 2, 4

    Yang, P., Lu, B., Xia, Z., Han, C., Gao, Y., Zhang, T., Zhan, K., Lang, X., Zheng, Y., Zhang, Q.: Worldrft: Latent world model planning with reinforcement fine- tuning for autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.19133 (2025) 2, 4

    2025

  48. [56]

    In: AAAI

    Yang, Y., Mei, J., Ma, Y., Du, S., Chen, W., Qian, Y., Feng, Y., Liu, Y.: Driving in the occupancy world: Vision-centric 4d occupancy forecasting and planning via world models for autonomous driving. In: AAAI. vol. 39, pp. 9327–9335 (2025) 2, 11

    2025

  49. [57]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03601 (2024) 13

    Yuan, C., Zhang, Z., Sun, J., Sun, S., Huang, Z., Lee, C.D.W., Li, D., Han, Y., Wong, A., Tee, K.P., et al.: Drama: An efficient end-to-end motion planner for autonomous driving with mamba. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03601 (2024) 13

    2024

  50. [58]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.24113 (2025) 2, 4

    Zhang, K., Tang, Z., Hu, X., Pan, X., Guo, X., Liu, Y., Huang, J., Yuan, L., Zhang, Q., Long, X.X., et al.: Epona: Autoregressive diffusion world model for autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.24113 (2025) 2, 4

    2025

  51. [59]

    In: CVPR

    Zhao, G., Ni, C., Wang, X., Zhu, Z., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Huang, G., Chen, X., Wang, B., Zhang, Y., et al.: Drivedreamer4d: World models are effective data machines for 4d driving scene representation. In: CVPR. pp. 12015–12026 (2025) 4

    2025

  52. [60]

    In: ECCV

    Zheng,W.,Chen,W.,Huang,Y.,Zhang,B.,Duan,Y.,Lu,J.:Occworld:Learninga 3d occupancy world model for autonomous driving. In: ECCV. pp. 55–72. Springer (2024) 2, 4

    2024

  53. [61]

    In: ECCV

    Zheng, W., Song, R., Guo, X., Zhang, C., Chen, L.: Genad: Generative end-to-end autonomous driving. In: ECCV. pp. 87–104. Springer (2024) 4, 11

    2024

  54. [62]

    In: ICCV

    Zheng, Y., Yang, P., Xing, Z., Zhang, Q., Zheng, Y., Gao, Y., Li, P., Zhang, T., Xia, Z., Jia, P., et al.: World4drive: End-to-end autonomous driving via intention- aware physical latent world model. In: ICCV. pp. 28632–28642 (2025) 2, 4, 9, 11, 13

    2025

  55. [63]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.23463 (2025) 4

    Zhou, X., Han, X., Yang, F., Ma, Y., Tresp, V., Knoll, A.: Opendrivevla: Towards end-to-end autonomous driving with large vision language action model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.23463 (2025) 4

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed May 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.