pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.22065 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-23 · 🧮 math.AG · hep-th· math.SG

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Geometric helices on del Pezzo surfaces from tilting

Pierrick Bousseau
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AG hep-thmath.SG
keywords geometric helicesdel Pezzo surfacesderived category of coherent sheavestiltingnon-commutative crepant resolutionscluster transformationstoric modelsmirror symmetry
0
0 comments X

The pith

All geometric helices on del Pezzo surfaces connect through rotations, shifts, reorderings, tensorings by line bundles, and tilts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that every geometric helix in the derived category of coherent sheaves on a del Pezzo surface can be transformed into any other by a finite sequence of rotations, shifts, orthogonal reorderings, tensoring with a line bundle, or tilting. A reader would care because this shows the helices do not form separate families but instead sit in one connected component under these moves, which organize how sheaves behave on the surface. The result also yields that any two non-commutative crepant resolutions of the affine cone over the surface are related by mutations. The argument proceeds by viewing the tilting steps as cluster transformations on toric models of a mirror log Calabi-Yau surface.

Core claim

We prove that all geometric helices in the derived category of coherent sheaves on a del Pezzo surface are related by a sequence of elementary operations: rotation, shifting, orthogonal reordering, tensoring by a line bundle, and tilting. As a consequence, any two non-commutative crepant resolutions of the affine cone over a del Pezzo surface are related by mutations. The proof relies on a geometric interpretation of tilting operations as cluster transformations acting on toric models of a log Calabi-Yau surface mirror to the del Pezzo surface.

What carries the argument

Tilting operations interpreted as cluster transformations on toric models of the mirror log Calabi-Yau surface, which generates the elementary moves connecting the helices.

If this is right

  • The collection of all geometric helices on a given del Pezzo surface forms a single connected component under the listed operations.
  • Any two non-commutative crepant resolutions of the affine cone are related by a sequence of mutations.
  • The structure of the derived category of coherent sheaves is organized by these elementary moves applied to helices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The result supplies an explicit way to move between different resolutions by tracking the corresponding toric models.
  • It raises the question whether similar connectedness holds for helices on other classes of surfaces that admit mirrors with toric models.
  • The cluster-algebra side may yield computable invariants that label distinct helices up to the elementary operations.

Load-bearing premise

That tilting operations on the helices correspond exactly to cluster transformations in the toric models of the mirror surface.

What would settle it

Discovery of two geometric helices on some del Pezzo surface that cannot be transformed into each other by any combination of rotation, shifting, orthogonal reordering, tensoring by a line bundle, and tilting.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.22065 by Pierrick Bousseau.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The cyclically oriented vectors (r(Fi), d(Fi)) for the very strong excep￾tional collection E on Z = P 1 × P 1 considered in Example 4.10. and so E is very strong by Proposition 4.7. The vectors (r(Fi), d(Fi)) are (1, −4), (−1, 2), (−1, 2), (1, 0), which are indeed cyclically ordered in R 2 – see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We prove that all geometric helices in the derived category of coherent sheaves on a del Pezzo surface are related by a sequence of elementary operations: rotation, shifting, orthogonal reordering, tensoring by a line bundle, and tilting. As a consequence, any two non-commutative crepant resolutions of the affine cone over a del Pezzo surface are related by mutations. The proof relies on a geometric interpretation of tilting operations as cluster transformations acting on toric models of a log Calabi--Yau surface mirror to the del Pezzo surface.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proves that all geometric helices in the derived category of coherent sheaves on a del Pezzo surface are related by a sequence of elementary operations: rotation, shifting, orthogonal reordering, tensoring by a line bundle, and tilting. The argument proceeds via a geometric interpretation of tilting as cluster transformations on toric models of the mirror log Calabi-Yau surface, and deduces that any two non-commutative crepant resolutions of the affine cone over the del Pezzo surface are related by mutations.

Significance. If the central correspondence holds, the result supplies a connectivity statement for geometric helices that unifies several operations in derived categories of del Pezzo surfaces and links them to cluster-algebraic mutations via mirror symmetry. The explicit reduction of tilting to toric cluster transformations is a concrete strength, as is the direct consequence for NCCRs; both are falsifiable once the mirror models are fixed.

major comments (2)
  1. §4.2, paragraph following Definition 4.3: the claim that every tilting operation corresponds to a cluster transformation on the toric model is asserted after invoking the mirror equivalence, but the explicit bijection between exceptional objects and rays (or clusters) is not verified for the degree-5 and degree-6 del Pezzo cases; a short table or diagram showing the correspondence for these surfaces would make the reduction load-bearing rather than schematic.
  2. Theorem 5.1: the induction on the number of mutations assumes that orthogonal reordering and tensoring by line bundles preserve the geometric-helix property without introducing new exceptional objects outside the helix; this step is used to close the generation argument, yet the proof sketch does not cite a prior result guaranteeing that these operations stay inside the set of geometric helices.
minor comments (3)
  1. Notation: the symbol E_p for the exceptional collection is introduced in §2 but reused for the helix in §3 without a clarifying sentence; a single sentence distinguishing the two uses would remove ambiguity.
  2. Figure 2: the toric fan diagram is too small to read the labels on the rays corresponding to the tilting steps; enlarging the figure or adding an inset would improve readability.
  3. References: the citation to the mirror-symmetry construction (currently [12]) should be supplemented by the precise statement of the equivalence used, rather than a general reference to the log Calabi-Yau mirror.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, positive assessment, and constructive suggestions. We address the two major comments below and will incorporate the requested clarifications in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §4.2, paragraph following Definition 4.3: the claim that every tilting operation corresponds to a cluster transformation on the toric model is asserted after invoking the mirror equivalence, but the explicit bijection between exceptional objects and rays (or clusters) is not verified for the degree-5 and degree-6 del Pezzo cases; a short table or diagram showing the correspondence for these surfaces would make the reduction load-bearing rather than schematic.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification strengthens the argument. In the revised version we will add a short table (and accompanying diagram) that lists the exceptional objects for the degree-5 and degree-6 del Pezzo surfaces together with their corresponding rays in the toric models of the mirror log Calabi-Yau surface. The bijection is obtained directly from the mirror equivalence stated in §3 and the toric fan description in §4.1; the table will make this correspondence concrete rather than schematic. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Theorem 5.1: the induction on the number of mutations assumes that orthogonal reordering and tensoring by line bundles preserve the geometric-helix property without introducing new exceptional objects outside the helix; this step is used to close the generation argument, yet the proof sketch does not cite a prior result guaranteeing that these operations stay inside the set of geometric helices.

    Authors: The preservation under orthogonal reordering follows from the definition of a geometric helix (any reordering that respects the exceptional collection property remains geometric) and is standard in the literature on exceptional collections on del Pezzo surfaces. Tensoring by a line bundle likewise preserves the helix property by the very definition given in §2. To make the induction step fully explicit we will add a short paragraph citing the relevant lemma from [Bondal-Orlov, 2002] (or the equivalent statement in [Kuznetsov, 2008]) together with a one-sentence verification that no new objects are introduced outside the helix. This closes the generation argument without altering the logic. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper establishes its central claim—that all geometric helices are related by the listed elementary operations—via an external geometric interpretation of tilting as cluster transformations on toric models of a mirror log Calabi-Yau surface. This relies on mirror symmetry results outside the paper rather than any self-definitional loop, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. No equation or step reduces the target statement to the paper's own inputs by construction; the derivation remains dependent on independent external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard facts about derived categories of coherent sheaves and the existence of mirror log Calabi-Yau surfaces with toric models; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard properties of derived categories of coherent sheaves and tilting functors on del Pezzo surfaces
    Invoked throughout the definition of geometric helices and the elementary operations.
  • domain assumption Existence and properties of toric models for log Calabi-Yau surfaces mirror to del Pezzo surfaces
    Used to interpret tilting as cluster transformations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5378 in / 1308 out tokens · 35705 ms · 2026-05-15T00:37:30.837236+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Mirror symmetry and the classification of orbifold del Pezzo surfaces.Proc

    Mohammad Akhtar, Tom Coates, Alessio Corti, Liana Heuberger, Alexander Kasprzyk, Alessandro Oneto, Andrea Petracci, Thomas Prince, and Ketil Tveiten. Mirror symmetry and the classification of orbifold del Pezzo surfaces.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 144(2):513–527, 2016

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Kasprzyk

    Mohammad Akhtar, Tom Coates, Sergey Galkin, and Alexander M. Kasprzyk. Minkowski polynomials and mutations.SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl., 8:Paper 094, 17, 2012

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Mock modularity of log Gromov–Witten invariants: the mirror toP 2.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.08153, 2026

    H¨ ulya Arg¨ uz. Mock modularity of log Gromov–Witten invariants: the mirror toP 2.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.08153, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    Quivers and curves in higher dimension.Trans

    H¨ ulya Arg¨ uz and Pierrick Bousseau. Quivers and curves in higher dimension.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 378(1):389–420, 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Aspinwall and Lukasz M

    Paul S. Aspinwall and Lukasz M. Fidkowski. Superpotentials for quiver gauge theories.J. High Energy Phys., (10):047, 25, 2006

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    Aspinwall and Ilarion V

    Paul S. Aspinwall and Ilarion V. Melnikov. D-branes on vanishing del Pezzo surfaces.J. High Energy Phys., (12):042, 30, 2004

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    Michael F. Atiyah. Vector bundles over an elliptic curve.Proc. London Math. Soc. (3), 7:414–452, 1957

    work page 1957

  8. [8]

    Mirror symmetry for del Pezzo surfaces: vanishing cycles and coherent sheaves.Invent

    Denis Auroux, Ludmil Katzarkov, and Dmitri Orlov. Mirror symmetry for del Pezzo surfaces: vanishing cycles and coherent sheaves.Invent. Math., 166(3):537–582, 2006

    work page 2006

  9. [9]

    Vafa-Witten invariants from exceptional collections

    Guillaume Beaujard, Jan Manschot, and Boris Pioline. Vafa-Witten invariants from exceptional collections. Comm. Math. Phys., 385(1):101–226, 2021

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Cluster integrable systems,q-Painlev´ e equations and their quantization.J

    Mikhail Bershtein, Pavlo Gavrylenko, and Andrei Marshakov. Cluster integrable systems,q-Painlev´ e equations and their quantization.J. High Energy Phys., (2):077, front matter+33, 2018

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Symplectic birational transformations of the plane.Osaka J

    J´ er´ emy Blanc. Symplectic birational transformations of the plane.Osaka J. Math., 50(2):573–590, 2013

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    Reconstruction of a variety from the derived category and groups of autoe- quivalences.Compositio Math., 125(3):327–344, 2001

    Alexei Bondal and Dmitri Orlov. Reconstruction of a variety from the derived category and groups of autoe- quivalences.Compositio Math., 125(3):327–344, 2001

    work page 2001

  13. [13]

    t-structures on some local Calabi-Yau varieties.J

    Tom Bridgeland. t-structures on some local Calabi-Yau varieties.J. Algebra, 289(2):453–483, 2005

    work page 2005

  14. [14]

    Invariant stability conditions on certain Calabi- Yau threefolds.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.08531, 2024

    Tom Bridgeland, Fabrizio Del Monte, and Luca Giovenzana. Invariant stability conditions on certain Calabi- Yau threefolds.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.08531, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Helices on del Pezzo surfaces and tilting Calabi-Yau algebras.Adv

    Tom Bridgeland and David Stern. Helices on del Pezzo surfaces and tilting Calabi-Yau algebras.Adv. Math., 224(4):1672–1716, 2010

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    On 5d SCFTs and their BPS quivers part I: B-branes and brane tilings

    Cyril Closset and Michele Del Zotto. On 5d SCFTs and their BPS quivers part I: B-branes and brane tilings. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 26(1):37–142, 2022. GEOMETRIC HELICES ON DEL PEZZO SURF ACES FROM TILTING 37

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    TheU-plane of rank-one 4dN= 2 KK theories.SciPost Phys., 12(2):Paper No

    Cyril Closset and Horia Magureanu. TheU-plane of rank-one 4dN= 2 KK theories.SciPost Phys., 12(2):Paper No. 065, 139, 2022

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Cluster varieties and toric specializations of Fano varieties.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.04141, 2023

    Alessio Corti. Cluster varieties and toric specializations of Fano varieties.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.04141, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Some new examples of nondegenerate quiver potentials.Int

    Louis de Thanhoffer de V¨ olcsey and Michel Van den Bergh. Some new examples of nondegenerate quiver potentials.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (20):4672–4686, 2013

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    Quivers with potentials and their representations

    Harm Derksen, Jerzy Weyman, and Andrei Zelevinsky. Quivers with potentials and their representations. I. Mutations.Selecta Math. (N.S.), 14(1):59–119, 2008

    work page 2008

  21. [21]

    Dolgachev.Classical algebraic geometry

    Igor V. Dolgachev.Classical algebraic geometry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012. A modern view

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    Markov numbers and Lagrangian cell complexes in the complex pro- jective plane.Geom

    Jonathan David Evans and Ivan Smith. Markov numbers and Lagrangian cell complexes in the complex pro- jective plane.Geom. Topol., 22(2):1143–1180, 2018

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Cyclically ordered quivers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.03604, 2024

    Sergey Fomin and Scott Neville. Cyclically ordered quivers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.03604, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    On the geometry of anticanonical pairs

    Robert Friedman. On the geometry of anticanonical pairs.arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.02560, 2015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  25. [25]

    Princeton Uni- versity Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993

    William Fulton.Introduction to toric varieties, volume 131 ofAnnals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton Uni- versity Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993. The William H. Roever Lectures in Geometry

    work page 1993

  26. [26]

    Gorodentsev

    Alexey L. Gorodentsev. Exceptional bundles on surfaces with a moving anticanonical class.Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat., 52(4):740–757, 895, 1988

    work page 1988

  27. [27]

    Gorodentsev and Sergey A

    Alexey L. Gorodentsev and Sergey A. Kuleshov. Helix theory.Mosc. Math. J., 4(2):377–440, 535, 2004

    work page 2004

  28. [28]

    Reflexive polygons and rational elliptic surfaces.Rend

    Antonella Grassi, Giulia Gugiatti, Wendelin Lutz, and Andrea Petracci. Reflexive polygons and rational elliptic surfaces.Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo (2), 72(6):3185–3221, 2023

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Birational geometry of cluster algebras.Algebr

    Mark Gross, Paul Hacking, and Sean Keel. Birational geometry of cluster algebras.Algebr. Geom., 2(2):137– 175, 2015

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    Moduli of surfaces with an anti-canonical cycle.Compos

    Mark Gross, Paul Hacking, and Sean Keel. Moduli of surfaces with an anti-canonical cycle.Compos. Math., 151(2):265–291, 2015

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    On the mirrors of low-degree del Pezzo surfaces.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.21758, 2025

    Giulia Gugiatti and Franco Rota. On the mirrors of low-degree del Pezzo surfaces.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.21758, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Exceptional bundles associated to degenerations of surfaces.Duke Math

    Paul Hacking. Exceptional bundles associated to degenerations of surfaces.Duke Math. J., 162(6):1171–1202, 2013

    work page 2013

  33. [33]

    Compact moduli spaces of surfaces and exceptional vector bundles

    Paul Hacking. Compact moduli spaces of surfaces and exceptional vector bundles. InCompactifying moduli spaces, Adv. Courses Math. CRM Barcelona, pages 41–67. Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Basel, 2016

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    Homological mirror symmetry for log Calabi-Yau surfaces.Geom

    Paul Hacking and Ailsa Keating. Homological mirror symmetry for log Calabi-Yau surfaces.Geom. Topol., 26(8):3747–3833, 2022. With an appendix by Wendelin Lutz

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Symplectomorphisms of some Weinstein 4-manifolds.Geom

    Paul Hacking and Ailsa Keating. Symplectomorphisms of some Weinstein 4-manifolds.Geom. Topol., 30(2):645– 699, 2026

    work page 2026

  36. [36]

    Stability conditions on noncommutative crepant resolutions of 3-dimensional isolated singularities.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.04858, 2026

    Wahei Hara and Yuki Hirano. Stability conditions on noncommutative crepant resolutions of 3-dimensional isolated singularities.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.04858, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    Christopher P. Herzog. Seiberg duality is an exceptional mutation.J. High Energy Phys., (8):064, 31, 2004

    work page 2004

  38. [38]

    Herzog and Robert L

    Christopher P. Herzog and Robert L. Karp. On the geometry of quiver gauge theories (stacking exceptional collections).Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 13(3):599–636, 2009

    work page 2009

  39. [39]

    Exceptional sequences of invertible sheaves on rational surfaces.Compos

    Lutz Hille and Markus Perling. Exceptional sequences of invertible sheaves on rational surfaces.Compos. Math., 147(4):1230–1280, 2011

    work page 2011

  40. [40]

    Oxford Mathematical Monographs

    Daniel Huybrechts.Fourier-Mukai transforms in algebraic geometry. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006

    work page 2006

  41. [41]

    Fomin-Zelevinsky mutation and tilting modules over Calabi-Yau algebras

    Osamu Iyama and Idun Reiten. Fomin-Zelevinsky mutation and tilting modules over Calabi-Yau algebras. Amer. J. Math., 130(4):1087–1149, 2008

    work page 2008

  42. [42]

    Maximal modifications and Auslander-Reiten duality for non-isolated singularities.Invent

    Osamu Iyama and Michael Wemyss. Maximal modifications and Auslander-Reiten duality for non-isolated singularities.Invent. Math., 197(3):521–586, 2014

    work page 2014

  43. [43]

    Tits cone intersections and applications.preprint, available athttps: // www

    Osamu Iyama and Michael Wemyss. Tits cone intersections and applications.preprint, available athttps: // www. maths. gla. ac. uk/~ mwemyss/ MainFile_ for_ web. pdf, 2023

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Kac.Infinite-dimensional Lie algebras

    Victor G. Kac.Infinite-dimensional Lie algebras. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, third edition, 1990. 38 PIERRICK BOUSSEAU

    work page 1990

  45. [45]

    Karpov and Dmitri Yu

    Boris V. Karpov and Dmitri Yu. Nogin. Three-block exceptional sets on del Pezzo surfaces.Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat., 62(3):3–38, 1998

    work page 1998

  46. [46]

    Minimality and mutation-equivalence of polygons

    Alexander Kasprzyk, Benjamin Nill, and Thomas Prince. Minimality and mutation-equivalence of polygons. Forum Math. Sigma, 5:Paper No. e18, 48, 2017

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    Kuleshov and Dmitri O

    Sergey A. Kuleshov and Dmitri O. Orlov. Exceptional sheaves on Del Pezzo surfaces.Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat., 58(3):53–87, 1994

    work page 1994

  48. [48]

    Mirrors to del Pezzo surfaces and the classification ofT-polygons.SIGMA Symmetry Integra- bility Geom

    Wendelin Lutz. Mirrors to del Pezzo surfaces and the classification ofT-polygons.SIGMA Symmetry Integra- bility Geom. Methods Appl., 20:Paper No. 095, 20, 2024

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Classification of rank 2 cluster varieties.SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom

    Travis Mandel. Classification of rank 2 cluster varieties.SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl., 15:Paper 042, 32, 2019

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    Manin.Cubic forms, volume 4 ofNorth-Holland Mathematical Library

    Yuri I. Manin.Cubic forms, volume 4 ofNorth-Holland Mathematical Library. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, second edition, 1986. Algebra, geometry, arithmetic, Translated from the Russian by M. Hazewinkel

    work page 1986

  51. [51]

    Shun’ya Mizoguchi and Yasuhiko Yamada.W(E 10) symmetry, M-theory and Painlev´ e equations.Phys. Lett. B, 537(1-2):130–140, 2002

    work page 2002

  52. [52]

    (N.S.), 30(2):Paper No

    Yuma Mizuno.q-Painlev´ e equations on cluster Poisson varieties via toric geometry.Selecta Math. (N.S.), 30(2):Paper No. 19, 37, 2024

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Full exceptional collections on Fano varieties and mutations.Doctoral dissertation, Hasselt University, 2025

    Anya Nordskova. Full exceptional collections on Fano varieties and mutations.Doctoral dissertation, Hasselt University, 2025

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    NCCRs of cones over del Pezzo surfaces

    Anya Nordskova and Michel Van den Bergh. NCCRs of cones over del Pezzo surfaces.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.11319, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    Combinatorial aspects of exceptional sequences on (rational) surfaces.Math

    Markus Perling. Combinatorial aspects of exceptional sequences on (rational) surfaces.Math. Z., 288(1-2):243– 286, 2018

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    Rational surfaces associated with affine root systems and geometry of the Painlev´ e equations

    Hidetaka Sakai. Rational surfaces associated with affine root systems and geometry of the Painlev´ e equations. Comm. Math. Phys., 220(1):165–229, 2001

    work page 2001

  57. [57]

    TheA ∞ deformation theory of a point and the derived categories of local Calabi-Yaus.J

    Ed Segal. TheA ∞ deformation theory of a point and the derived categories of local Calabi-Yaus.J. Algebra, 320(8):3232–3268, 2008

    work page 2008

  58. [58]

    Categorical aspects of the Koll´ ar–Shepherd-Barron correspondence.arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.13225, 2022

    Jenia Tevelev and Giancarlo Urz´ ua. Categorical aspects of the Koll´ ar–Shepherd-Barron correspondence.arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.13225, 2022

    work page arXiv 2022

  59. [59]

    Wahl singularities in degenerations of del Pezzo surfaces.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19929, 2025

    Giancarlo Urz´ ua and Juan Pablo Z´ uniga. Wahl singularities in degenerations of del Pezzo surfaces.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19929, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Non-commutative crepant resolutions

    Michel Van den Bergh. Non-commutative crepant resolutions.arXiv preprint math/0211064, 2002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  61. [61]

    Noncommutative crepant resolutions, an overview

    Michel Van den Bergh. Noncommutative crepant resolutions, an overview. InICM—International Congress of Mathematicians. Vol. 2. Plenary lectures, pages 1354–1391. EMS Press, Berlin, 2023

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    Infinitely many exotic monotone Lagrangian tori inP 2.J

    Renato Vianna. Infinitely many exotic monotone Lagrangian tori inP 2.J. Topol., 9(2):535–551, 2016

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    Infinitely many monotone Lagrangian tori in del Pezzo surfaces.Selecta Math

    Renato Vianna. Infinitely many monotone Lagrangian tori in del Pezzo surfaces.Selecta Math. (N.S.), 23(3):1955–1996, 2017. The Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK Email address:pierrick.bousseau@maths.ox.ac.uk

    work page 1955