Suppression of Superconductivity and Electrostatic Side Gate Tuning in High Mobility SrTiO$_3$ Surface Electron Gas

Dickson Boahen; Eshanvi Rao; Evgeny Mikheev; Gayan De Silva; Sushant Padhye

arxiv: 2603.22205 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.supr-con

Suppression of Superconductivity and Electrostatic Side Gate Tuning in High Mobility SrTiO₃ Surface Electron Gas

Dickson Boahen , Sushant Padhye , Gayan De Silva , Eshanvi Rao , Evgeny Mikheev This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.supr-con

keywords SrTiO32DEGsuperconductivityhigh mobilityelectrostatic gatingside gatesconfinementquantum devices

0 comments

The pith

High-mobility SrTiO3 surface electron gas shows no superconductivity down to 10 mK

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper fabricates patterned high-mobility 2DEGs on SrTiO3 by hydrogen plasma exposure, reaching mobilities up to 7400 cm2/Vs. Systematic tuning of electron density through controlled aging covers the range expected for the STO 2DEG superconducting dome, yet no transition appears down to 10 mK. The authors attribute the suppression to strong vertical confinement that rearranges the electronic orbitals. Electrostatic side gates provide density modulation whose range improves with greater gate-to-channel separation, while low densities trigger stochastic pinch-offs that create quasi-ballistic constrictions with irregular conductance steps. This platform is presented as an epitaxy-free route to oxide quantum devices.

Core claim

No superconducting transition is observed in these high-mobility quasi-two-dimensional SrTiO3 electron gases down to approximately 10 mK across a wide range of electron densities, which is attributed to the vertical confinement inherent to the surface 2DEG and associated electronic orbital rearrangement. Electrostatic side gates allow density modulation that improves with increased gate-to-channel separation, and low-density operation leads to stochastic pinch-off creating quasi-ballistic constrictions with irregular conductance quantization.

What carries the argument

Hydrogen-plasma-induced surface 2DEG on SrTiO3 whose vertical confinement rearranges orbitals and suppresses superconductivity

If this is right

Superconductivity is suppressed across the expected density dome in high-mobility surface STO 2DEGs.
Electrostatic modulation range increases with larger side-gate-to-channel separation.
Low-density pinch-off produces quasi-ballistic constrictions showing irregular conductance quantization.
An epitaxy-free route exists for patterning high-mobility oxide quantum devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Confinement-induced suppression may apply to other oxide surface or interface 2DEGs.
Gate-defined constrictions offer a route to study ballistic transport and disorder in oxide channels.
Hybrid structures that relax vertical confinement could restore superconductivity for device use.
The platform enables gate-tunable elements in future oxide-based quantum circuits.

Load-bearing premise

The achieved electron densities fully cover the superconducting dome of the STO 2DEG and the absence of superconductivity is caused by vertical confinement rather than residual disorder or experimental limits.

What would settle it

Detection of a superconducting transition above 10 mK at an electron density inside the known STO 2DEG superconducting dome in a comparable but less confined structure.

read the original abstract

We report on the fabrication and characterization of patterned high-mobility two-dimensional electron gases (2DEG) formed on SrTiO$_3$ (STO) substrate surfaces by hydrogen plasma exposure. The resulting devices consistently showed high electron mobilities up to 7400 cm$^2$/V$\cdot$s. A large range of electron density was systematically explored by controlled aging of the sample between cooldowns, including the expected range for the STO 2DEG superconducting dome. No superconducting transition was observed down to the base temperature of approximately 10 mK. This suggests suppression of superconductivity in high mobility quasi-two-dimensional SrTiO$_3$ electron gas, likely linked to vertical confinement and electronic orbital rearrangement. We systematically explored electrostatic gate modulation in this 2DEG system and its scaling with electron density and side gate geometry. In contrast with our initial expectation, we observed an improvement of achievable total modulation for larger side gate to channel separation. At low electron density, stochastic channel pinch-off events were observed, creating quasi-ballistic constrictions with irregular conductance quantization. This epitaxy-free and high mobility oxide material platform offers a promising new route towards patterning quantum devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Plasma method gives high-mobility patterned STO 2DEGs without epitaxy and no superconductivity to 10 mK, but density overlap with the dome is not clearly shown.

read the letter

The main point is that hydrogen plasma exposure on bare STO creates patterned 2DEGs with mobilities up to 7400 cm²/Vs and no superconducting transition down to 10 mK, even after aging to sweep density through the usual range. They also report side-gate tuning that improves with larger channel-to-gate spacing and stochastic pinch-off at low density that forms irregular constrictions. This is a straightforward epitaxy-free route to high-mobility oxide 2DEGs, which is useful on its own. The fabrication looks reproducible from the description, and the gate scaling result runs counter to simple expectation, so that part is worth noting. The superconductivity suppression is the headline claim and is tied to confinement and orbital effects. The problem is that the abstract and stress-test note give no tabulated Hall densities, no direct overlay on the literature dome boundaries, and no discussion of how aging might add scattering that lowers Tc on its own. High mobility helps, but it does not close the gap. Without those numbers or full R(T) curves with error bars, the confinement interpretation stays plausible but not locked down. This paper is for groups working on STO 2DEGs, oxide interfaces, or simple quantum devices who want an easier starting platform. A reader who needs the fabrication recipe or the gate data will find concrete observations. The work is experimental and grounded enough to deserve referee time, even with the missing density details. I would send it for review and ask for the Hall density table plus a plot against prior dome data.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports fabrication of patterned high-mobility 2DEGs on SrTiO3 surfaces via hydrogen plasma exposure, achieving mobilities up to 7400 cm²/V·s. Controlled aging between cooldowns is used to explore a large range of electron densities, stated to include the expected range for the STO 2DEG superconducting dome. No superconducting transition is observed down to ~10 mK, which the authors attribute to vertical confinement and orbital rearrangement. The work also presents electrostatic side-gate tuning results, including improved total modulation for larger gate-channel separations and stochastic pinch-off events at low density that form quasi-ballistic constrictions.

Significance. If the accessed densities demonstrably overlap the literature superconducting dome (typically ~5–20 × 10^{12} cm^{-2}) and aging-induced disorder can be ruled out as the cause of Tc suppression, the result would be significant: it would indicate that vertical confinement in this quasi-2D high-mobility STO system suppresses superconductivity, providing insight into the role of orbital degrees of freedom and offering an epitaxy-free platform for oxide-based quantum devices.

major comments (2)

[Results section on density exploration and superconductivity] The central claim of superconductivity suppression requires that the densities reached by controlled aging intersect the known STO 2DEG superconducting dome, yet no tabulated Hall densities, error bars on density values, or explicit numerical comparison to literature dome boundaries are provided. This omission is load-bearing because aging-induced disorder or interface scattering could suppress Tc independently of confinement.
[Experimental methods and transport data presentation] Full temperature-dependent resistivity curves, controls for aging-induced changes between cooldowns, and details of the density calibration procedure are absent, leaving the no-transition observation to ~10 mK only partially supported and difficult to evaluate for robustness.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states a 'large range' of densities was explored but does not quote the achieved density window or mobility values at each point; adding these numbers would improve clarity.
[Figure captions and data presentation] Ensure all transport figures include error bars on resistivity or mobility data and clearly label the base temperature of 10 mK measurements.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and have incorporated revisions to strengthen the presentation of our data and claims.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Results section on density exploration and superconductivity] The central claim of superconductivity suppression requires that the densities reached by controlled aging intersect the known STO 2DEG superconducting dome, yet no tabulated Hall densities, error bars on density values, or explicit numerical comparison to literature dome boundaries are provided. This omission is load-bearing because aging-induced disorder or interface scattering could suppress Tc independently of confinement.

Authors: We agree that explicit tabulation of Hall densities with error bars and a direct numerical comparison to the literature superconducting dome is required to substantiate the central claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a table listing the measured Hall densities for each cooldown/aging step together with their uncertainties. We have also included a figure that overlays our accessed density range on the typical boundaries of the STO 2DEG superconducting dome reported in the literature. To address the possibility of aging-induced disorder, we note that mobility remains high (up to 7400 cm²/V·s) across the aging sequence; we have added mobility-versus-density data demonstrating that the primary effect of aging is density tuning with only modest additional scattering. revision: yes
Referee: [Experimental methods and transport data presentation] Full temperature-dependent resistivity curves, controls for aging-induced changes between cooldowns, and details of the density calibration procedure are absent, leaving the no-transition observation to ~10 mK only partially supported and difficult to evaluate for robustness.

Authors: We have expanded the methods section with a step-by-step description of the Hall-effect density calibration procedure performed at 4 K. Full temperature-dependent resistivity curves down to base temperature for representative densities are now provided in the supplementary information. Controls for aging-induced changes are included by showing the systematic evolution of both density and mobility over successive cooldowns, confirming that the observed density tuning is reproducible and not accompanied by irreversible degradation. These additions should allow a more complete evaluation of the robustness of the absence of a superconducting transition. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental observations

full rationale

The manuscript reports device fabrication, mobility measurements up to 7400 cm²/Vs, density tuning via controlled aging, and direct observation of no superconducting transition to ~10 mK. No equations, parameter fitting, ansatz, or derivation chain appear in the provided text. The central claim (suppression of superconductivity) is presented as an inference from measured quantities rather than a reduction to prior results or self-citations. Density overlap with the literature dome is asserted but not derived; any gap is a factual verification issue, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard condensed-matter assumptions about density calibration in STO 2DEGs and the existence of a superconducting dome; no free parameters or new entities are introduced.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Electron density can be reliably tuned into the superconducting dome range via controlled sample aging between cooldowns
Invoked when stating that the explored densities include the expected superconducting range.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5534 in / 1277 out tokens · 54020 ms · 2026-05-15T00:52:48.081664+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

No superconducting transition was observed down to the base temperature of approximately 10 mK. This suggests suppression of superconductivity in high mobility quasi-two-dimensional SrTiO₃ electron gas, likely linked to vertical confinement and electronic orbital rearrangement.
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

A large range of electron density was systematically explored by controlled aging of the sample between cooldowns, including the expected range for the STO 2DEG superconducting dome.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

[1]

M. N. Gastiasoro, J. Ruhman, and R. M. Fernandes, Super- conductivity in dilute SrTiO3: A review, Annals of Physics 6, 168107 (2020)

work page 2020
[2]

X. Lin, Z. Zhu, B. Fauqu´ e, and K. Behnia, Fermi surface of the most dilute superconductor, Physical Review X3, 021002 (2013)

work page 2013
[3]

Joshua, S

A. Joshua, S. Pecker, J. Ruhman, E. Altman, and S. Ilani, A universal critical density underlying the physics of elec- trons at the LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 interface, Nature Communi- cations3, 1129 (2012). 7

work page 2012
[4]

Caviglia, S

A. Caviglia, S. Gariglio, N. Reyren, D. Jaccard, T. Schnei- der, M. Gabay, S. Thiel, G. Hammerl, J. Mannhart, and J. Triscone, Field-effect control of superconductivity and Rashba spin-orbit coupling in top-gated LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 devices, Physical Review Letters104, 126803 (2010)

work page 2010
[5]

R. C. Neville, B. Hoeneisen, and C. A. Mead, Permittivity of strontium titanate, Journal of Applied Physics43, 2124 (1972)

work page 1972
[6]

Z. Yang, D. Lee, J. Yue, J. Gabel, T. Lee, R. D. James, S. A. Chambers, and B. Jalan, Epitaxial SrTiO 3 films with di- electric constants exceeding 25,000, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119, e2202189119 (2022)

work page 2022
[7]

R. S. Eggli, S. Svab, T. Patlatiuk, D. A. Tr¨ ussel, M. J. Car- ballido, P. Chevalier Kwon, S. Geyer, A. Li, E. P. Bakkers, A. V. Kuhlmann, and D. M. Zumb¨ uhl, Cryogenic hyper- abrupt strontium titanate varactors for sensitive reflectom- etry of quantum dots, Physical Review Applied20(2023)

work page 2023
[8]

A. D. Caviglia, M. Gabay, S. Gariglio, N. Reyren, C. Can- cellieri, and J.-M. Triscone, Tunable Rashba Spin-Orbit In- teraction at Oxide Interfaces, Physical Review Letters104, 126803 (2010)

work page 2010
[9]

Mikheev, I

E. Mikheev, I. T. Rosen, J. Kombe, F. Damanet, M. A. Kastner, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, A clean ballistic quan- tum point contact in SrTiO 3, Nature Electronics6, 142 (2023)

work page 2023
[10]

G. E. D. K. Prawiroatmodjo, M. Leijnse, F. Trier, Y. Chen, D. V. Christensen, M. Von Soosten, N. Pryds, and T. S. Jes- persen, Transport and excitations in a negative-Uquantum dot at the LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 interface, Nature Communica- tions8, 395 (2017)

work page 2017
[11]

Thierschmann, E

H. Thierschmann, E. Mulazimoglu, N. Manca, S. Goswami, T. M. Klapwijk, and A. D. Caviglia, Transport regimes of a split gate superconducting quantum point contact in the two-dimensional LaAlO3/SrTiO3 superfluid, Nature Com- munications9, 2276 (2018)

work page 2018
[12]

Jouan, G

A. Jouan, G. Singh, E. Lesne, D. C. Vaz, M. Bibes, A. Barth´ el´ emy, C. Ulysse, D. Stornaiuolo, M. Salluzzo, S. Hurand, J. Lesueur, C. Feuillet-Palma, and N. Bergeal, Quantized conductance in a one-dimensional ballistic oxide nanodevice, Nature Electronics3, 201 (2020)

work page 2020
[13]

A. M. R. V. L. Monteiro, D. J. Groenendijk, N. Manca, E. Mulazimoglu, S. Goswami, Y. Blanter, L. M. K. Van- dersypen, and A. D. Caviglia, Side gate tunable Josephson junctions at the LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 interface, Nano Letters 17, 715 (2017)

work page 2017
[14]

Stornaiuolo, D

D. Stornaiuolo, D. Massarotti, R. Di Capua, P. Lucignano, G. P. Pepe, M. Salluzzo, and F. Tafuri, Signatures of un- conventional superconductivity in the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 two- dimensional system, Physical Review B95, 140502 (2017)

work page 2017
[15]

Annadi, G

A. Annadi, G. Cheng, H. Lee, J.-W. Lee, S. Lu, A. Tylan- Tyler, M. Briggeman, M. Tomczyk, M. Huang, D. Pekker, C.-B. Eom, and J. Irvin, P.and Levy, Quantized ballistic transport of electrons and electron pairs in LaAlO3/SrTiO3 nanowires, Nano Letters18, 4473 (2018)

work page 2018
[16]

Mikheev, I

E. Mikheev, I. T. Rosen, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Quan- tized critical supercurrent in SrTiO 3-based quantum point contacts, Science Advances7, eabi6520 (2021)

work page 2021
[17]

Gallagher, M

P. Gallagher, M. Lee, J. R. Williams, and D. Goldhaber- Gordon, Gate-tunable superconducting weak link and quantum point contact spectroscopy on a strontium ti- tanate surface, Nature Physics10, 748 (2014)

work page 2014
[18]

Gallagher, M

P. Gallagher, M. Lee, T. A. Petach, S. W. Stan- wyck, J. R. Williams, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, A high-mobility electronic system at an electrolyte-gated oxide surface, Nature Communica- tions6, 6437 (2015)

work page 2015
[19]

Hvid-Olsen, C

T. Hvid-Olsen, C. Hoegfeldt, D. J. Carrad, N. Gauquelin, D. Olsteins, J. Verbeeck, N. Bergeal, T. S. Jespersen, and F. Trier, Coexistence of high electron-mobility, un- paired spins, and superconductivity at high carrier den- sity SrTiO3-based interfaces, Physical Review Materials9 (2025)

work page 2025
[20]

Caviglia, S

A. Caviglia, S. Gariglio, C. Cancellieri, B. Sac´ ep´ e, A. Fete, N. Reyren, M. Gabay, A. F. Morpurgo, and J.-M. Triscone, Two-dimensional quantum oscillations of the conductance at LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interfaces, Physical Review Letters105, 236802 (2010)

work page 2010
[21]

G. E. D. K. Prawiroatmodjo, F. Trier, D. V. Christensen, Y. Chen, N. Pryds, and T. S. Jespersen, Evidence of weak superconductivity at the room-temperature grown LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface, Physical Review B93, 184504 (2016)

work page 2016
[22]

Z. Chen, A. G. Swartz, H. Yoon, H. Inoue, T. A. Merz, D. Lu, Y. Xie, H. Yuan, Y. Hikita, S. Raghu, and H. Y. Hwang, Carrier density and disorder tuned superconductor- metal transition in a two-dimensional electron system, Na- ture Communications9, 1 (2018)

work page 2018
[23]

Jouan, S

A. Jouan, S. Hurand, G. Singh, E. Lesne, A. Barth´ el´ emy, M. Bibes, C. Ulysse, G. Saiz, C. Feuillet-Palma, J. Lesueur, and N. Bergeal, Multiband effects in the superconducting phase diagram of oxide interfaces, Advanced Materials In- terfaces9, 2201392 (2022)

work page 2022
[24]

thin films

K. Takahashi, D. Matthey, D. Jaccard, and J.-M. Triscone, Transport properties of reduced SrTiO3 single crystal “thin films”, Annalen der Physik516, 68 (2004)

work page 2004
[25]

S. S. Yadav, S. Kumar, P. Kumar, and A. Venkatesan, Engineering Surface Oxygen Vacancies in SrTiO 3 to Form a High Mobility and Transparent Quasi Two-dimensional Electron System, arXiv:2207.12933 (2022)

work page arXiv 2022
[26]

C. Bell, S. Harashima, Y. Kozuka, M. Kim, B. G. Kim, Y. Hikita, and H. Y. Hwang, Dominant mobility modula- tion by the electric field effect at the LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 in- terface, Physical Review Letters103, 226802 (2009)

work page 2009
[27]

Mikheev, B

E. Mikheev, B. Himmetoglu, A. P. Kajdos, P. Moetakef, T. A. Cain, C. G. Van de Walle, and S. Stemmer, Limita- tions to the room temperature mobility of two-and three- dimensional electron liquids in SrTiO 3, Applied Physics Letters106, 062102 (2015)

work page 2015
[28]

Water-cycle

F. Bi, D. F. Bogorin, C. Cen, C. W. Bark, J. wan Park, C. B. Eom, and J. Levy, “Water-cycle” mechanism for writ- ing and erasing nanostructures at the LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 in- terface, Applied Physics Letters (2010)

work page 2010
[29]

Takeuchi, R

Y. Takeuchi, R. Hobara, R. Akiyama, A. Takayama, S. Ichi- nokura, R. Yukawa, I. Matsuda, and S. Hasegawa, Two- dimensional conducting layer on the SrTiO 3 surface in- duced by hydrogenation, Physical Review B101(2020)

work page 2020
[30]

M. B. Shalom, M. Sachs, D. Rakhmilevitch, A. Palevski, and Y. Dagan, Tuning spin-orbit coupling and supercon- ductivity at the SrTiO3/LaAlO3 interface: a magnetotrans- port study, Physical Review Letters104, 126802 (2010)

work page 2010
[31]

Padhye, J

S. Padhye, J. Yue, S. Varshney, B. Jalan, D. Goldhaber- Gordon, and E. Mikheev, Superconducting dome in ionic liquid gated homoepitaxial strontium titanate thin films (2026)

work page 2026
[32]

Y. Z. Chen, F. Trier, T. Wijnands, R. J. Green, N. Gauquelin, R. Egoavil, D. V. Christensen, G. Koster, M. Huijben, N. Bovet, S. Macke, F. He, R. Sutarto, N. H. Andersen, J. A. Sulpizio, M. Honig, G. E. D. K. Prawiroat- modjo, T. S. Jespersen, S. Linderoth, S. Ilani, J. Ver- beeck, G. Van Tendeloo, G. Rijnders, G. A. Sawatzky, and N. Pryds, Extreme mobili...

work page 2015
[33]

Trier, G

F. Trier, G. E. D. K. Prawiroatmodjo, Z. Zhong, D. V. Christensen, M. von Soosten, A. Bhowmik, J. M. G. Lastra, Y. Chen, T. S. Jespersen, and N. Pryds, Quantization of Hall Resistance at the Metallic Interface between an Oxide Insulator and SrTiO3, Physical Review Letters117, 096804 (2016)

work page 2016
[34]

K. Rubi, J. Gosteau, R. Serra, K. Han, S. Zeng, Z. Huang, B. Warot-Fonrose, R. Arras, E. Snoeck, M. Goiran, and W. Escoffier, Aperiodic quantum oscillations in the two- dimensional electron gas at the LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 interface, NPJ Quantum Materials5, 9 (2020)

work page 2020
[35]

Y. Xie, C. Bell, M. Kim, H. Inoue, Y. Hikita, and H. Y. Hwang, Quantum longitudinal and Hall transport at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface at low electron densities, Solid State Communications197, 25 (2014)

work page 2014
[36]

Singh, A

G. Singh, A. Jouan, L. Benfatto, S. Caprara, S. Fratini, C. Feuillet-Palma, A. Rastogi, R. C. Budhani, M. Grilli, A. Barth´ el´ emy, B. M., J. Lesueur, and N. Bergeal, Com- petition between electron pairing and phase coherence in superconducting interfaces, Nature Communications9, 407 (2018)

work page 2018
[37]

Khalsa and A

G. Khalsa and A. H. MacDonald, Theory of the SrTiO 3 surface state two-dimensional electron gas, Physical Review B86, 125121 (2012)

work page 2012
[38]

Z. Chen, H. Yuan, Y. Xie, D. Lu, H. Inoue, Y. Hikita, C. Bell, and H. Y. Hwang, Dual-gate modulation of carrier density and disorder in an oxide two-dimensional electron system, Nano Letters16, 6130 (2016)

work page 2016
[39]

W´ ojcik, B

P. W´ ojcik, B. Szafran, J. Czarnecki, R. Citro, and M. Zegrodnik, Effect of electrostatic confinement on the dome-shaped superconducting phase diagram at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface, Scientific Reports14, 26177 (2024)

work page 2024
[40]

Chikina, D

A. Chikina, D. V. Christensen, V. Borisov, M.-A. Husanu, Y. Chen, X. Wang, T. Schmitt, M. Radovic, N. Nagaosa, A. S. Mishchenko, R. Valenti, N. Pryds, and V. N. Stro- cov, Band-Order Anomaly at theγ-Al 2O3/SrTiO3 Inter- face Drives the Electron-Mobility Boost, ACS Nano15, 4347 (2021)

work page 2021
[41]

Jalan, S

B. Jalan, S. Stemmer, S. Mack, and S. J. Allen, Two- dimensional electron gas inδ-doped SrTiO 3, Physical Re- view B82, 081103 (2010)

work page 2010
[42]

Mikheev, B

E. Mikheev, B. D. Hoskins, D. B. Strukov, and S. Stemmer, Resistive switching and its suppression in Pt/Nb:SrTiO 3 junctions, Nature Communications5, 3990 (2014)

work page 2014
[43]

Biscaras, S

J. Biscaras, S. Hurand, C. Feuillet-Palma, A. Rastogi, R. Budhani, N. Reyren, E. Lesne, J. Lesueur, and N. Bergeal, Limit of the electrostatic doping in two- dimensional electron gases of LaXO 3(X= Al, Ti)/SrTiO 3, Scientific Reports4, 6788 (2014)

work page 2014
[44]

Kalisky, E

B. Kalisky, E. M. Spanton, H. Noad, J. R. Kirtley, K. C. Nowack, C. Bell, H. K. Sato, M. Hosoda, Y. Xie, Y. Hikita, C. Woltmann, G. Pfanzelt, R. Jany, C. Richter, H. Y. Hwang, J. Mannhart, and K. A. Moler, Locally en- hanced conductivity due to the tetragonal domain structure in LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 heterointerfaces, Nature Materials12, 1091 (2013)

work page 2013
[45]

Persky, N

E. Persky, N. Vardi, A. M. R. V. L. Monteiro, T. C. van Thiel, H. Yoon, Y. Xie, B. Fauqu´ e, A. D. Caviglia, H. Y. Hwang, K. Behnia, J. Ruhman, and B. Kalisky, Non- universal current flow near the metal-insulator transition in an oxide interface, Nature Communications12, 3311 (2021)

work page 2021
[46]

H. J. H. Ma, S. Scharinger, S. W. Zeng, D. Kohlberger, M. Lange, A. St¨ ohr, X. R. Wang, T. Venkatesan, R. Kleiner, J. F. Scott, J. M. D. Coey, D. Koelle, and Ar- iando, Local electrical imaging of tetragonal domains and field-induced ferroelectric twin walls in conducting SrTiO3, Physical Review Letters116, 257601 (2016)

work page 2016
[47]

Frenkel, N

Y. Frenkel, N. Haham, Y. Shperber, C. Bell, Y. Xie, Z. Chen, Y. Hikita, H. Y. Hwang, E. K. Salje, and B. Kalisky, Imaging and tuning polarity at SrTiO 3 domain walls, Nature Materials16, 1203 (2017)

work page 2017
[48]

B¨ uttiker, Quantized transmission of a saddle-point con- striction, Physical Review B41, 7906 (1990)

M. B¨ uttiker, Quantized transmission of a saddle-point con- striction, Physical Review B41, 7906 (1990)

work page 1990
[49]

Xiang, A

J. Xiang, A. Vidan, M. Tinkham, R. M. Westervelt, and C. M. Lieber, Ge/Si nanowire mesoscopic Josephson junc- tions, Nature Nanotechnology1, 208 (2006)

work page 2006
[50]

SUPPRESSION OF SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND ELECTROST A TIC SIDE GA TE TUNING IN HIGH MOBILITY SR TIO 3 SURF ACE ELECTRON GAS

C. Mittag, M. Karalic, Z. Lei, C. Thomas, A. Tuaz, A. T. Hatke, G. C. Gardner, M. J. Manfra, T. Ihn, and K. En- sslin, Gate-defined quantum point contact in an InAs two- dimensional electron gas, Physical Review B100, 075422 (2019). S1 SUPPLEMENT AR Y MA TERIAL FOR “SUPPRESSION OF SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND ELECTROST A TIC SIDE GA TE TUNING IN HIGH MOBILITY SR...

work page 2019

[1] [1]

M. N. Gastiasoro, J. Ruhman, and R. M. Fernandes, Super- conductivity in dilute SrTiO3: A review, Annals of Physics 6, 168107 (2020)

work page 2020

[2] [2]

X. Lin, Z. Zhu, B. Fauqu´ e, and K. Behnia, Fermi surface of the most dilute superconductor, Physical Review X3, 021002 (2013)

work page 2013

[3] [3]

Joshua, S

A. Joshua, S. Pecker, J. Ruhman, E. Altman, and S. Ilani, A universal critical density underlying the physics of elec- trons at the LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 interface, Nature Communi- cations3, 1129 (2012). 7

work page 2012

[4] [4]

Caviglia, S

A. Caviglia, S. Gariglio, N. Reyren, D. Jaccard, T. Schnei- der, M. Gabay, S. Thiel, G. Hammerl, J. Mannhart, and J. Triscone, Field-effect control of superconductivity and Rashba spin-orbit coupling in top-gated LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 devices, Physical Review Letters104, 126803 (2010)

work page 2010

[5] [5]

R. C. Neville, B. Hoeneisen, and C. A. Mead, Permittivity of strontium titanate, Journal of Applied Physics43, 2124 (1972)

work page 1972

[6] [6]

Z. Yang, D. Lee, J. Yue, J. Gabel, T. Lee, R. D. James, S. A. Chambers, and B. Jalan, Epitaxial SrTiO 3 films with di- electric constants exceeding 25,000, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119, e2202189119 (2022)

work page 2022

[7] [7]

R. S. Eggli, S. Svab, T. Patlatiuk, D. A. Tr¨ ussel, M. J. Car- ballido, P. Chevalier Kwon, S. Geyer, A. Li, E. P. Bakkers, A. V. Kuhlmann, and D. M. Zumb¨ uhl, Cryogenic hyper- abrupt strontium titanate varactors for sensitive reflectom- etry of quantum dots, Physical Review Applied20(2023)

work page 2023

[8] [8]

A. D. Caviglia, M. Gabay, S. Gariglio, N. Reyren, C. Can- cellieri, and J.-M. Triscone, Tunable Rashba Spin-Orbit In- teraction at Oxide Interfaces, Physical Review Letters104, 126803 (2010)

work page 2010

[9] [9]

Mikheev, I

E. Mikheev, I. T. Rosen, J. Kombe, F. Damanet, M. A. Kastner, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, A clean ballistic quan- tum point contact in SrTiO 3, Nature Electronics6, 142 (2023)

work page 2023

[10] [10]

G. E. D. K. Prawiroatmodjo, M. Leijnse, F. Trier, Y. Chen, D. V. Christensen, M. Von Soosten, N. Pryds, and T. S. Jes- persen, Transport and excitations in a negative-Uquantum dot at the LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 interface, Nature Communica- tions8, 395 (2017)

work page 2017

[11] [11]

Thierschmann, E

H. Thierschmann, E. Mulazimoglu, N. Manca, S. Goswami, T. M. Klapwijk, and A. D. Caviglia, Transport regimes of a split gate superconducting quantum point contact in the two-dimensional LaAlO3/SrTiO3 superfluid, Nature Com- munications9, 2276 (2018)

work page 2018

[12] [12]

Jouan, G

A. Jouan, G. Singh, E. Lesne, D. C. Vaz, M. Bibes, A. Barth´ el´ emy, C. Ulysse, D. Stornaiuolo, M. Salluzzo, S. Hurand, J. Lesueur, C. Feuillet-Palma, and N. Bergeal, Quantized conductance in a one-dimensional ballistic oxide nanodevice, Nature Electronics3, 201 (2020)

work page 2020

[13] [13]

A. M. R. V. L. Monteiro, D. J. Groenendijk, N. Manca, E. Mulazimoglu, S. Goswami, Y. Blanter, L. M. K. Van- dersypen, and A. D. Caviglia, Side gate tunable Josephson junctions at the LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 interface, Nano Letters 17, 715 (2017)

work page 2017

[14] [14]

Stornaiuolo, D

D. Stornaiuolo, D. Massarotti, R. Di Capua, P. Lucignano, G. P. Pepe, M. Salluzzo, and F. Tafuri, Signatures of un- conventional superconductivity in the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 two- dimensional system, Physical Review B95, 140502 (2017)

work page 2017

[15] [15]

Annadi, G

A. Annadi, G. Cheng, H. Lee, J.-W. Lee, S. Lu, A. Tylan- Tyler, M. Briggeman, M. Tomczyk, M. Huang, D. Pekker, C.-B. Eom, and J. Irvin, P.and Levy, Quantized ballistic transport of electrons and electron pairs in LaAlO3/SrTiO3 nanowires, Nano Letters18, 4473 (2018)

work page 2018

[16] [16]

Mikheev, I

E. Mikheev, I. T. Rosen, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Quan- tized critical supercurrent in SrTiO 3-based quantum point contacts, Science Advances7, eabi6520 (2021)

work page 2021

[17] [17]

Gallagher, M

P. Gallagher, M. Lee, J. R. Williams, and D. Goldhaber- Gordon, Gate-tunable superconducting weak link and quantum point contact spectroscopy on a strontium ti- tanate surface, Nature Physics10, 748 (2014)

work page 2014

[18] [18]

Gallagher, M

P. Gallagher, M. Lee, T. A. Petach, S. W. Stan- wyck, J. R. Williams, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, A high-mobility electronic system at an electrolyte-gated oxide surface, Nature Communica- tions6, 6437 (2015)

work page 2015

[19] [19]

Hvid-Olsen, C

T. Hvid-Olsen, C. Hoegfeldt, D. J. Carrad, N. Gauquelin, D. Olsteins, J. Verbeeck, N. Bergeal, T. S. Jespersen, and F. Trier, Coexistence of high electron-mobility, un- paired spins, and superconductivity at high carrier den- sity SrTiO3-based interfaces, Physical Review Materials9 (2025)

work page 2025

[20] [20]

Caviglia, S

A. Caviglia, S. Gariglio, C. Cancellieri, B. Sac´ ep´ e, A. Fete, N. Reyren, M. Gabay, A. F. Morpurgo, and J.-M. Triscone, Two-dimensional quantum oscillations of the conductance at LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interfaces, Physical Review Letters105, 236802 (2010)

work page 2010

[21] [21]

G. E. D. K. Prawiroatmodjo, F. Trier, D. V. Christensen, Y. Chen, N. Pryds, and T. S. Jespersen, Evidence of weak superconductivity at the room-temperature grown LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface, Physical Review B93, 184504 (2016)

work page 2016

[22] [22]

Z. Chen, A. G. Swartz, H. Yoon, H. Inoue, T. A. Merz, D. Lu, Y. Xie, H. Yuan, Y. Hikita, S. Raghu, and H. Y. Hwang, Carrier density and disorder tuned superconductor- metal transition in a two-dimensional electron system, Na- ture Communications9, 1 (2018)

work page 2018

[23] [23]

Jouan, S

A. Jouan, S. Hurand, G. Singh, E. Lesne, A. Barth´ el´ emy, M. Bibes, C. Ulysse, G. Saiz, C. Feuillet-Palma, J. Lesueur, and N. Bergeal, Multiband effects in the superconducting phase diagram of oxide interfaces, Advanced Materials In- terfaces9, 2201392 (2022)

work page 2022

[24] [24]

thin films

K. Takahashi, D. Matthey, D. Jaccard, and J.-M. Triscone, Transport properties of reduced SrTiO3 single crystal “thin films”, Annalen der Physik516, 68 (2004)

work page 2004

[25] [25]

S. S. Yadav, S. Kumar, P. Kumar, and A. Venkatesan, Engineering Surface Oxygen Vacancies in SrTiO 3 to Form a High Mobility and Transparent Quasi Two-dimensional Electron System, arXiv:2207.12933 (2022)

work page arXiv 2022

[26] [26]

C. Bell, S. Harashima, Y. Kozuka, M. Kim, B. G. Kim, Y. Hikita, and H. Y. Hwang, Dominant mobility modula- tion by the electric field effect at the LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 in- terface, Physical Review Letters103, 226802 (2009)

work page 2009

[27] [27]

Mikheev, B

E. Mikheev, B. Himmetoglu, A. P. Kajdos, P. Moetakef, T. A. Cain, C. G. Van de Walle, and S. Stemmer, Limita- tions to the room temperature mobility of two-and three- dimensional electron liquids in SrTiO 3, Applied Physics Letters106, 062102 (2015)

work page 2015

[28] [28]

Water-cycle

F. Bi, D. F. Bogorin, C. Cen, C. W. Bark, J. wan Park, C. B. Eom, and J. Levy, “Water-cycle” mechanism for writ- ing and erasing nanostructures at the LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 in- terface, Applied Physics Letters (2010)

work page 2010

[29] [29]

Takeuchi, R

Y. Takeuchi, R. Hobara, R. Akiyama, A. Takayama, S. Ichi- nokura, R. Yukawa, I. Matsuda, and S. Hasegawa, Two- dimensional conducting layer on the SrTiO 3 surface in- duced by hydrogenation, Physical Review B101(2020)

work page 2020

[30] [30]

M. B. Shalom, M. Sachs, D. Rakhmilevitch, A. Palevski, and Y. Dagan, Tuning spin-orbit coupling and supercon- ductivity at the SrTiO3/LaAlO3 interface: a magnetotrans- port study, Physical Review Letters104, 126802 (2010)

work page 2010

[31] [31]

Padhye, J

S. Padhye, J. Yue, S. Varshney, B. Jalan, D. Goldhaber- Gordon, and E. Mikheev, Superconducting dome in ionic liquid gated homoepitaxial strontium titanate thin films (2026)

work page 2026

[32] [32]

Y. Z. Chen, F. Trier, T. Wijnands, R. J. Green, N. Gauquelin, R. Egoavil, D. V. Christensen, G. Koster, M. Huijben, N. Bovet, S. Macke, F. He, R. Sutarto, N. H. Andersen, J. A. Sulpizio, M. Honig, G. E. D. K. Prawiroat- modjo, T. S. Jespersen, S. Linderoth, S. Ilani, J. Ver- beeck, G. Van Tendeloo, G. Rijnders, G. A. Sawatzky, and N. Pryds, Extreme mobili...

work page 2015

[33] [33]

Trier, G

F. Trier, G. E. D. K. Prawiroatmodjo, Z. Zhong, D. V. Christensen, M. von Soosten, A. Bhowmik, J. M. G. Lastra, Y. Chen, T. S. Jespersen, and N. Pryds, Quantization of Hall Resistance at the Metallic Interface between an Oxide Insulator and SrTiO3, Physical Review Letters117, 096804 (2016)

work page 2016

[34] [34]

K. Rubi, J. Gosteau, R. Serra, K. Han, S. Zeng, Z. Huang, B. Warot-Fonrose, R. Arras, E. Snoeck, M. Goiran, and W. Escoffier, Aperiodic quantum oscillations in the two- dimensional electron gas at the LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 interface, NPJ Quantum Materials5, 9 (2020)

work page 2020

[35] [35]

Y. Xie, C. Bell, M. Kim, H. Inoue, Y. Hikita, and H. Y. Hwang, Quantum longitudinal and Hall transport at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface at low electron densities, Solid State Communications197, 25 (2014)

work page 2014

[36] [36]

Singh, A

G. Singh, A. Jouan, L. Benfatto, S. Caprara, S. Fratini, C. Feuillet-Palma, A. Rastogi, R. C. Budhani, M. Grilli, A. Barth´ el´ emy, B. M., J. Lesueur, and N. Bergeal, Com- petition between electron pairing and phase coherence in superconducting interfaces, Nature Communications9, 407 (2018)

work page 2018

[37] [37]

Khalsa and A

G. Khalsa and A. H. MacDonald, Theory of the SrTiO 3 surface state two-dimensional electron gas, Physical Review B86, 125121 (2012)

work page 2012

[38] [38]

Z. Chen, H. Yuan, Y. Xie, D. Lu, H. Inoue, Y. Hikita, C. Bell, and H. Y. Hwang, Dual-gate modulation of carrier density and disorder in an oxide two-dimensional electron system, Nano Letters16, 6130 (2016)

work page 2016

[39] [39]

W´ ojcik, B

P. W´ ojcik, B. Szafran, J. Czarnecki, R. Citro, and M. Zegrodnik, Effect of electrostatic confinement on the dome-shaped superconducting phase diagram at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface, Scientific Reports14, 26177 (2024)

work page 2024

[40] [40]

Chikina, D

A. Chikina, D. V. Christensen, V. Borisov, M.-A. Husanu, Y. Chen, X. Wang, T. Schmitt, M. Radovic, N. Nagaosa, A. S. Mishchenko, R. Valenti, N. Pryds, and V. N. Stro- cov, Band-Order Anomaly at theγ-Al 2O3/SrTiO3 Inter- face Drives the Electron-Mobility Boost, ACS Nano15, 4347 (2021)

work page 2021

[41] [41]

Jalan, S

B. Jalan, S. Stemmer, S. Mack, and S. J. Allen, Two- dimensional electron gas inδ-doped SrTiO 3, Physical Re- view B82, 081103 (2010)

work page 2010

[42] [42]

Mikheev, B

E. Mikheev, B. D. Hoskins, D. B. Strukov, and S. Stemmer, Resistive switching and its suppression in Pt/Nb:SrTiO 3 junctions, Nature Communications5, 3990 (2014)

work page 2014

[43] [43]

Biscaras, S

J. Biscaras, S. Hurand, C. Feuillet-Palma, A. Rastogi, R. Budhani, N. Reyren, E. Lesne, J. Lesueur, and N. Bergeal, Limit of the electrostatic doping in two- dimensional electron gases of LaXO 3(X= Al, Ti)/SrTiO 3, Scientific Reports4, 6788 (2014)

work page 2014

[44] [44]

Kalisky, E

B. Kalisky, E. M. Spanton, H. Noad, J. R. Kirtley, K. C. Nowack, C. Bell, H. K. Sato, M. Hosoda, Y. Xie, Y. Hikita, C. Woltmann, G. Pfanzelt, R. Jany, C. Richter, H. Y. Hwang, J. Mannhart, and K. A. Moler, Locally en- hanced conductivity due to the tetragonal domain structure in LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 heterointerfaces, Nature Materials12, 1091 (2013)

work page 2013

[45] [45]

Persky, N

E. Persky, N. Vardi, A. M. R. V. L. Monteiro, T. C. van Thiel, H. Yoon, Y. Xie, B. Fauqu´ e, A. D. Caviglia, H. Y. Hwang, K. Behnia, J. Ruhman, and B. Kalisky, Non- universal current flow near the metal-insulator transition in an oxide interface, Nature Communications12, 3311 (2021)

work page 2021

[46] [46]

H. J. H. Ma, S. Scharinger, S. W. Zeng, D. Kohlberger, M. Lange, A. St¨ ohr, X. R. Wang, T. Venkatesan, R. Kleiner, J. F. Scott, J. M. D. Coey, D. Koelle, and Ar- iando, Local electrical imaging of tetragonal domains and field-induced ferroelectric twin walls in conducting SrTiO3, Physical Review Letters116, 257601 (2016)

work page 2016

[47] [47]

Frenkel, N

Y. Frenkel, N. Haham, Y. Shperber, C. Bell, Y. Xie, Z. Chen, Y. Hikita, H. Y. Hwang, E. K. Salje, and B. Kalisky, Imaging and tuning polarity at SrTiO 3 domain walls, Nature Materials16, 1203 (2017)

work page 2017

[48] [48]

B¨ uttiker, Quantized transmission of a saddle-point con- striction, Physical Review B41, 7906 (1990)

M. B¨ uttiker, Quantized transmission of a saddle-point con- striction, Physical Review B41, 7906 (1990)

work page 1990

[49] [49]

Xiang, A

J. Xiang, A. Vidan, M. Tinkham, R. M. Westervelt, and C. M. Lieber, Ge/Si nanowire mesoscopic Josephson junc- tions, Nature Nanotechnology1, 208 (2006)

work page 2006

[50] [50]

SUPPRESSION OF SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND ELECTROST A TIC SIDE GA TE TUNING IN HIGH MOBILITY SR TIO 3 SURF ACE ELECTRON GAS

C. Mittag, M. Karalic, Z. Lei, C. Thomas, A. Tuaz, A. T. Hatke, G. C. Gardner, M. J. Manfra, T. Ihn, and K. En- sslin, Gate-defined quantum point contact in an InAs two- dimensional electron gas, Physical Review B100, 075422 (2019). S1 SUPPLEMENT AR Y MA TERIAL FOR “SUPPRESSION OF SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND ELECTROST A TIC SIDE GA TE TUNING IN HIGH MOBILITY SR...

work page 2019