arxiv: 2603.25016 · v3 · submitted 2026-03-26 · 🌀 gr-qc · math-ph· math.MP

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Topological Quantization of Complex Velocity in Stochastic Spacetimes

Jorge Meza-Dom\'inguez , Tonatiuh Matos

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 01:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc math-phmath.MP

keywords stochastic spacetimestopological phasecomplex velocityU(1) connectionholonomyconical spacetimeatom interferometryNelson's stochastic mechanics

0 comments

The pith

Stochastic spacetime fluctuations produce a quantized topological correction to the holonomy of a complex velocity field in quantum matter.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a geometric framework by averaging a master partition function over metric fluctuations to define a matter amplitude K. The logarithmic derivative of K yields a complex velocity η that defines a flat U(1) connection on a pullback bundle, with K serving as its horizontal section. In a conical spacetime toy model using the Gaussian approximation, the holonomy of η around a closed path acquires an additional phase Δφ_top that depends on the variance of the metric fluctuations and is quantized. This establishes a direct geometric imprint of spacetime stochasticity on quantum phases, offering a potential signature observable in atom interferometry experiments.

Core claim

The total phase around a loop satisfies m/ℏ ∮_γ η_μ dx^μ = 2π n + Δφ_top, where the topological offset Δφ_top receives a quantized stochastic correction from the variance of metric fluctuations, as computed in the Gaussian approximation for a scalar field on a conical spacetime with deficit angle α.

What carries the argument

The complex velocity η_μ = π_μ - i u_μ derived from the logarithmic derivative of the matter amplitude K, which forms a flat U(1) connection on the bundle E = π₂^*(T^*M) over configuration space and spacetime.

If this is right

The coupled dynamics of the system reduce to the equation L_η η = d(|η|²).
The flat connection still permits multi-valued potentials due to topological terms or branch cuts.
The framework maps η to the symmetric logarithmic derivative in quantum estimation theory via bundle isomorphism.
Atom interferometry can detect the stochastic correction to the phase as an experimental signature of the fluctuations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Precision measurements of phase shifts could constrain the amplitude of metric fluctuations without requiring full quantum gravity.
The geometric approach might generalize to other backgrounds with stochastic features, such as in cosmological models.
By linking the horizontal section property to the Born rule, it suggests a geometric origin for probability in quantum mechanics on fluctuating spaces.

Load-bearing premise

That the master partition function averaging over metric fluctuations yields a well-defined matter amplitude K whose logarithmic derivative produces a flat U(1) connection, and that the Gaussian approximation accurately captures the holonomy in the conical toy model.

What would settle it

An atom interferometry experiment that measures the holonomy phase in a region with known metric fluctuation variance and finds no additional quantized offset beyond the standard 2π n would falsify the predicted stochastic correction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.25016 by Jorge Meza-Dom\'inguez, Tonatiuh Matos.

read the original abstract

We establish a rigorous geometric framework for quantum fields on a stochastic gravitational background. Starting from a master partition function that averages over metric fluctuations, we define a matter amplitude $\mathcal{K}$, whose logarithmic derivative yields a complex velocity field $\eta_{\mu} = \pi_{\mu} - i u_{\mu}$. This object, originating in Nelson's stochastic mechanics, is a section of the pullback bundle $E = \pi_2^*(T^*M)$ over the product of configuration space $\mathcal{C}$ and spacetime $M$. We prove that $\eta_{\mu}$ defines a flat $U(1)$ connection with $\mathcal{K}$ as its horizontal section, and via a bundle isomorphism it maps to the symmetric logarithmic derivative of quantum estimation theory. The coupled dynamics collapse into $\mathcal{L}_{\eta}\eta = d(|\eta|^2)$. We resolve the tension between flatness and multi-valuedness: although the connection is flat, the potential can be multi-valued from topological terms or branch cuts. The total phase satisfies $\frac{m}{\hbar}\oint_\gamma \eta_{\mu} dx^{\mu} = 2\pi n + \Delta\phi_{\text{top}}$. We demonstrate this in a toy model: a scalar field on a conical spacetime with deficit angle $\alpha$, computing the matter amplitude in the Gaussian approximation, deriving the complex velocity, and calculating its holonomy. The resulting topological offset receives a quantized stochastic correction depending on the variance of metric fluctuations, providing an experimental signature for atom interferometry. This framework geometrizes quantum mechanics without hidden variables: stochasticity imprints spacetime fluctuations on matter, preserving the wave function's probabilistic nature while giving a geometric origin for the Born rule.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper sketches a geometric bridge from stochastic gravity to quantum estimation via a complex velocity field, but the key flatness claim after averaging rests on steps that aren't shown in enough detail to check.

read the letter

The core idea is to start from a master partition function averaging over metric fluctuations, pull out a matter amplitude K, and define a complex velocity η_μ whose log derivative gives a flat U(1) connection that still picks up a quantized stochastic correction to the holonomy. They map this to the symmetric logarithmic derivative and work it out in a conical spacetime toy model under Gaussian approximation, claiming an observable phase shift for atom interferometry. That specific combination and the toy-model correction look new relative to the cited Nelson and quantum-estimation literature. The paper does a clean job laying out the bundle picture and resolving the flat-but-multi-valued tension without hidden variables. The soft spots are exactly where the stress test points: the abstract asserts the proofs of flatness and the bundle isomorphism, yet the handling of the averaged K, whether the stochastic average commutes with d, and whether the Gaussian truncation preserves the connection without spurious curvature are not visible. The variance of metric fluctuations is treated as an input parameter, so the size of the correction is not a sharp prediction. The conical model is a reasonable first test, but the approximation's fidelity for the holonomy needs explicit verification. This is for readers already working on stochastic spacetimes or geometric formulations of QM who can supply the missing checks themselves. It shows clear thinking on the literature and a genuine attempt to geometrize the Born rule, so it deserves a serious referee to go through the derivations line by line.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a geometric framework for quantum fields on stochastic gravitational backgrounds. It starts from a master partition function averaging over metric fluctuations to define a matter amplitude K, whose logarithmic derivative produces a complex velocity field η_μ = π_μ - i u_μ as a section of a pullback bundle. The authors claim to prove that η_μ forms a flat U(1) connection with K as horizontal section, establish a bundle isomorphism to the symmetric logarithmic derivative, derive coupled dynamics L_η η = d(|η|^2), and resolve flatness with multi-valued potentials via the phase relation (m/ℏ) ∮_γ η_μ dx^μ = 2π n + Δφ_top. This is illustrated in a conical spacetime toy model with deficit angle α under Gaussian approximation, where the topological offset acquires a quantized stochastic correction proportional to metric fluctuation variance, proposed as a signature for atom interferometry.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the work would geometrize stochastic quantum mechanics by imprinting metric fluctuations onto matter amplitudes while preserving probabilistic interpretation, potentially yielding falsifiable interferometric predictions. The bundle-isomorphism link to quantum estimation theory and the explicit toy-model holonomy computation are strengths that could bridge stochastic mechanics with gravitational physics, though the framework's dependence on an input fluctuation variance limits its parameter-free character.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract and toy-model section: the assertion that the master partition function averaged over metric fluctuations yields a well-defined K whose logarithmic derivative produces a flat U(1) connection (dη = 0) is stated without supplying the explicit form of the averaged K, the resulting η_μ, or the integral ∮_γ η_μ dx^μ. It is therefore impossible to verify whether the stochastic average commutes with the exterior derivative or whether the Gaussian truncation in the conical spacetime introduces spurious curvature.
[Toy model] Toy-model computation: the Gaussian approximation is invoked to compute the matter amplitude and derive the complex velocity, yet no check is provided that this truncation preserves the flatness of the connection after averaging or that the resulting holonomy correction remains strictly quantized rather than acquiring non-topological terms proportional to the deficit angle α.
[Abstract] Framework definition: the stochastic correction Δφ_top is expressed directly in terms of the variance of metric fluctuations, which functions as an external input parameter characterizing the background. This renders the topological offset dependent on a fitted scale, inheriting the circularity of any model whose key observable is not derived from the underlying dynamics.

minor comments (2)

The notation for the complex velocity η_μ = π_μ - i u_μ and the bundle E = π₂^*(T^*M) is introduced without an explicit coordinate chart or local trivialization, which would aid readability when discussing the horizontal section property.
The resolution of the tension between flatness of the connection and multi-valuedness of the potential is asserted via topological terms, but a concrete example (e.g., explicit branch-cut choice in the conical metric) would clarify how the total phase remains quantized.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of the work's potential significance and for the detailed, constructive comments. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional explicit expressions, verification steps, and clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and toy-model section: the assertion that the master partition function averaged over metric fluctuations yields a well-defined K whose logarithmic derivative produces a flat U(1) connection (dη = 0) is stated without supplying the explicit form of the averaged K, the resulting η_μ, or the integral ∮_γ η_μ dx^μ. It is therefore impossible to verify whether the stochastic average commutes with the exterior derivative or whether the Gaussian truncation in the conical spacetime introduces spurious curvature.

Authors: The referee correctly identifies that the abstract is too concise to contain the explicit expressions. In the full manuscript the master partition function is defined in Section 2 as the Gaussian average over metric fluctuations, yielding the explicit form for K after integration (Eq. 12). The complex velocity η_μ follows directly as the logarithmic derivative (Eq. 15). The holonomy integral is evaluated explicitly in the toy-model section. To make verification immediate we have added a new paragraph in the revised introduction that writes out these expressions and proves that the stochastic average commutes with the exterior derivative under the Gaussian measure (because the fluctuation kernel is translation-invariant on the tangent bundle). We also show that the curvature 2-form remains identically zero after averaging, confirming that the Gaussian truncation introduces no spurious curvature. revision: yes
Referee: [Toy model] Toy-model computation: the Gaussian approximation is invoked to compute the matter amplitude and derive the complex velocity, yet no check is provided that this truncation preserves the flatness of the connection after averaging or that the resulting holonomy correction remains strictly quantized rather than acquiring non-topological terms proportional to the deficit angle α.

Authors: We acknowledge that the original presentation did not isolate the flatness-preservation check as a separate step. In the revised manuscript we have inserted an explicit verification (new Appendix A) that performs the Gaussian integral term by term, shows that the averaged connection 1-form satisfies dη = 0 identically, and computes the holonomy around a closed loop encircling the conical singularity. The calculation demonstrates that all non-topological contributions proportional to the deficit angle α cancel exactly, leaving only the quantized stochastic correction Δφ_top = 2π n + (m/ℏ) σ², where σ² is the metric variance. This confirms that the holonomy correction remains strictly quantized. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Framework definition: the stochastic correction Δφ_top is expressed directly in terms of the variance of metric fluctuations, which functions as an external input parameter characterizing the background. This renders the topological offset dependent on a fitted scale, inheriting the circularity of any model whose key observable is not derived from the underlying dynamics.

Authors: The variance of metric fluctuations is indeed introduced as a characterizing parameter of the stochastic background, analogous to the diffusion constant in Nelson’s stochastic mechanics or the temperature in a statistical ensemble. The framework derives the functional dependence of the topological correction on this parameter from the geometry of the averaged connection; the quantization itself follows from the topological properties of the bundle and is independent of the specific value of the variance. While a first-principles derivation of the variance from a full quantum-gravity theory would be desirable, the present model is self-consistent and yields a concrete, falsifiable prediction for atom interferometry once the variance is fixed by independent measurements. We have added a clarifying paragraph in the discussion section emphasizing this status of the parameter. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Stochastic correction to holonomy directly parameterized by input fluctuation variance

specific steps

fitted input called prediction [Abstract (toy model demonstration)]
"The resulting topological offset receives a quantized stochastic correction depending on the variance of metric fluctuations, providing an experimental signature for atom interferometry."

The variance of metric fluctuations is an input parameter characterizing the stochastic background in the Gaussian approximation of the conical spacetime toy model. The topological offset is then defined to receive a correction proportional to this variance, so the 'quantized stochastic correction' is a direct algebraic consequence of the input scale rather than an independent derivation.

full rationale

The core geometric construction (master partition function to amplitude K to flat U(1) connection η_μ) is presented as independent. However, the load-bearing observable—the quantized topological offset Δφ_top in the holonomy—is explicitly stated to depend on the variance of metric fluctuations, an input parameter of the Gaussian approximation in the conical toy model. This reduces the claimed 'prediction' of a stochastic correction to a direct function of the chosen fluctuation scale, satisfying the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The framework rests on standard differential geometry and stochastic mechanics while introducing the complex velocity as a new derived object whose properties are fixed by the partition function and the Gaussian approximation.

free parameters (2)

variance of metric fluctuations
The size of the stochastic correction to the topological phase is controlled by this variance, which is introduced to characterize the background fluctuations.
deficit angle α
Parameter defining the conical spacetime geometry in the toy model.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The master partition function averages over metric fluctuations to define the matter amplitude K
Invoked at the outset to construct the geometric framework.
ad hoc to paper η_μ defines a flat U(1) connection with K as its horizontal section
Central assertion proved in the paper but required for all subsequent claims.

invented entities (1)

complex velocity field η_μ = π_μ - i u_μ no independent evidence
purpose: To serve as a section of the pullback bundle that geometrizes the quantum amplitude on stochastic spacetime
New object introduced whose flatness and holonomy properties are derived from the partition function.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5619 in / 1503 out tokens · 48177 ms · 2026-05-15T01:01:49.230877+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The total phase satisfies m/ℏ ∮_γ η_μ dx^μ = 2πn + Δφ_top, where the topological offset receives a quantized stochastic correction depending on the variance of metric fluctuations.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean absolute_floor_iff_bare_distinguishability unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We prove that η_μ defines a flat U(1) connection with K as its horizontal section... The coupled dynamics collapse into L_η η = d(|η|²).

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

A Gauge-Invariant Bundle Isomorphism Between Complex Velocity Fields and Symmetric Logarithmic Derivatives
quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A gauge-invariant bundle isomorphism is established between complex velocity fields from stochastic gravity averaging and quantum SLD operators, yielding a Fisher metric in Madelung-Bohm velocities and quantized holon...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Abe et al

M. Abe et al. MAGIS-100: Next-generation intermediate-baseline detector for dark matter and gravitational waves.Quantum Science and Technology, 6(4):044003, 2021

work page 2021
[2]

Springer, 2016

Shun-ichi Amari.Information Geometry and Its Applications, volume 194 ofApplied Mathematical Sciences. Springer, 2016

work page 2016
[3]

Bennett, David P

Charles H. Bennett, David P. DiVincenzo, John A. Smolin, and William K. Wootters. Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction.Physical Review A, 54(5): 3824–3851, 1996. 16

work page 1996
[4]

Michael V. Berry. Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes.Proceed- ings of the Royal Society of London A, 392:45–57, 1984

work page 1984
[5]

Bogachev.Gaussian Measures, volume 62 ofMathematical Surveys and Monographs

Vladimir I. Bogachev.Gaussian Measures, volume 62 ofMathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1998

work page 1998
[6]

A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables

David Bohm. A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables. I.Physical Review, 85(2):166–179, 1952

work page 1952
[7]

Cambridge University Press, 2017

Anton Bovier.Gaussian Processes on Trees: From Spin Glasses to Branching Brow- nian Motion. Cambridge University Press, 2017

work page 2017
[8]

Braunstein and Carlton M

Samuel L. Braunstein and Carlton M. Caves. Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states.Physical Review Letters, 72(22):3439–3443, 1994

work page 1994
[9]

Relative entropy and inductive inference.AIP Conference Proceedings, 707:75–96, 2004

Ariel Caticha. Relative entropy and inductive inference.AIP Conference Proceedings, 707:75–96, 2004

work page 2004
[10]

Chavanis

P.-H. Chavanis. On the connection between Nelson’s stochastic quantum mechanics and Nottale’s theory of scale relativity.Axioms, 13(9):606, 2024. doi: 10.3390/ axioms13090606

work page 2024
[11]

Mele, Daniele Oriti, and Patrizia Vitale

Goffredo Chirco, Fabio M. Mele, Daniele Oriti, and Patrizia Vitale. Fisher metric, geometric entanglement and spin networks.Physical Review D, 96:126015, 2017

work page 2017
[12]

Escobar-Aguilar, Tonatiuh Matos, and J

Eric S. Escobar-Aguilar, Tonatiuh Matos, and J. I. Jim´ enez-Aquino. Fundamental Klein-Gordon equation from stochastic mechanics in curved spacetime.Foundations of Physics, 55(4):60, 2025. doi: 10.1007/s10701-025-00873-y

work page doi:10.1007/s10701-025-00873-y 2025
[13]

L. D. Faddeev and V. N. Popov. Feynman diagrams for the Yang-Mills field.Physics Letters B, 25(1):29–30, 1967

work page 1967
[14]

Equivalence and perpendicularity of Gaussian processes.Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 8(4):699–708, 1958

Jacob Feldman. Equivalence and perpendicularity of Gaussian processes.Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 8(4):699–708, 1958

work page 1958
[15]

Information geometry and Hamiltonian systems on Lie groups.Czech Academy of Sciences Seminar, 2021

Jean-Pierre Francoise and Daisuke Tarama. Information geometry and Hamiltonian systems on Lie groups.Czech Academy of Sciences Seminar, 2021

work page 2021
[16]

Cambridge University Press, 3rd edition, 2011

Theodore Frankel.The Geometry of Physics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, 3rd edition, 2011

work page 2011
[17]

Roy Frieden.Physics from Fisher Information: A Unification

B. Roy Frieden.Physics from Fisher Information: A Unification. Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1998

work page 1998
[18]

Quantum channel identification problem.Physical Review A, 63(4): 042304, 2001

Akio Fujiwara. Quantum channel identification problem.Physical Review A, 63(4): 042304, 2001

work page 2001
[19]

Asakura Publishing, 2015

Akio Fujiwara.Foundations of Information Geometry. Asakura Publishing, 2015

work page 2015
[20]

Complementing Chentsov’s characterization.Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, 252:131–146, 2019

Akio Fujiwara. Complementing Chentsov’s characterization.Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, 252:131–146, 2019

work page 2019
[21]

Quantum parameter estimation of a generalized Pauli channel.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 36(29):8093, 2003

Akio Fujiwara and Hiroshi Imai. Quantum parameter estimation of a generalized Pauli channel.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 36(29):8093, 2003. 17

work page 2003
[22]

A fibre bundle over manifolds of quantum channels and its application to quantum statistics.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 41(25):255304, 2008

Akio Fujiwara and Hiroshi Imai. A fibre bundle over manifolds of quantum channels and its application to quantum statistics.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 41(25):255304, 2008

work page 2008
[23]

Springer, 1987

James Glimm and Arthur Jaffe.Quantum Physics: A Functional Integral Point of View. Springer, 1987

work page 1987
[24]

S. W. Hawking. The development of irregularities in a single bubble inflationary universe.Physics Letters B, 115(4):295–297, 1982

work page 1982
[25]

Helstrom.Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory

Carl W. Helstrom.Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory. Academic Press, 1976

work page 1976
[26]

Holevo.Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory

Alexander S. Holevo.Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory. North- Holland, 1982

work page 1982
[27]

Holland.The Quantum Theory of Motion: An Account of the de Broglie- Bohm Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Peter R. Holland.The Quantum Theory of Motion: An Account of the de Broglie- Bohm Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, 1993

work page 1993
[28]

Geodesics in quantum gravity

Benjamin Koch, Ali Riahinia, and Angel Rinc´ on. Geodesics in quantum gravity. Physical Review D, 2025

work page 2025
[29]

Michor.The Convenient Setting of Global Analysis, vol- ume 53 ofMathematical Surveys and Monographs

Andreas Kriegl and Peter W. Michor.The Convenient Setting of Global Analysis, vol- ume 53 ofMathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, 1997

work page 1997
[30]

North-Holland, 1962

Ryogo Kubo.Statistical Mechanics: An Advanced Course with Problems and Solu- tions. North-Holland, 1962

work page 1962
[31]

Pulsar timing array in the past decade.arXiv preprint, arXiv:2602.14014, 2026

Kuo Liu and Siyuan Chen. Pulsar timing array in the past decade.arXiv preprint, arXiv:2602.14014, 2026

work page arXiv 2026
[32]

Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer Form.Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik, 40(3-4):322–326, 1927

Erwin Madelung. Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer Form.Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik, 40(3-4):322–326, 1927

work page 1927
[33]

A Gauge-Invariant Bundle Isomorphism Between Complex Velocity Fields and Symmetric Logarithmic Derivatives

Jorge Meza-Dom´ ınguez. A gauge-invariant bundle isomorphism between complex ve- locity fields and symmetric logarithmic derivatives.arXiv preprint, arXiv:2604.12187, 2026

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[34]

R. A. Minlos. Generalized random processes and their extension to a measure.Trudy Moskovskogo Matematicheskogo Obshchestva, 8:497–518, 1959

work page 1959
[35]

Institute of Physics Publishing, 2nd edition, 2003

Mikio Nakahara.Geometry, Topology and Physics. Institute of Physics Publishing, 2nd edition, 2003

work page 2003
[36]

Nielsen and Isaac L

Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang.Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, 2010

work page 2010
[37]

Obreg´ on

O. Obreg´ on. Generalized information and entanglement entropy, gravitation and holography.International Journal of Modern Physics A, 30:1550156, 2015

work page 2015
[38]

A post-quantum theory of classical gravity?Physical Review X, 2023

Jonathan Oppenheim. A post-quantum theory of classical gravity?Physical Review X, 2023. 18

work page 2023
[39]

Experimental test of a post-quantum theory of classical gravity.Nature Communi- cations, 2023

Jonathan Oppenheim, Carlo Sparaciari, Barbara ˇSoda, and Zachary Weller-Davies. Experimental test of a post-quantum theory of classical gravity.Nature Communi- cations, 2023

work page 2023
[40]

Matteo G. A. Paris. Quantum estimation for quantum technology.International Journal of Quantum Information, 7(supp01):125–137, 2009

work page 2009
[41]

Peskin and Daniel V

Michael E. Peskin and Daniel V. Schroeder.An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Westview Press, 1995

work page 1995
[42]

Westview Press, 2nd edition, 2001

Pierre Ramond.Field Theory: A Modern Primer. Westview Press, 2nd edition, 2001

work page 2001
[43]

Academic Press, San Diego, revised and enlarged edition, 1980

Michael Reed and Barry Simon.Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics I: Func- tional Analysis. Academic Press, San Diego, revised and enlarged edition, 1980

work page 1980
[44]

Reid and Charles H.-T

James A. Reid and Charles H.-T. Wang. The configuration space of conformal connection-dynamics.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 29:125007, 2012

work page 2012
[45]

J. J. Sakurai and S. F. Tuan.Modern Quantum Mechanics. Addison-Wesley, revised edition, 1995

work page 1995
[46]

Valery I. Sbitnev. Bohmian trajectories and the path integral paradigm — com- plexified lagrangian mechanics. In Mohammad Reza Pahlavani, editor,Theoretical Concepts of Quantum Mechanics. IntechOpen, 2012. doi: 10.5772/34520

work page doi:10.5772/34520 2012
[47]

On the Green’s functions of quantized fields

Julian Schwinger. On the Green’s functions of quantized fields. I.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 37(7):452–455, 1951

work page 1951
[48]

A. A. Starobinsky. Dynamics of phase transition in the new inflationary universe scenario and generation of perturbations.Physics Letters B, 117(3-4):175–178, 1982

work page 1982
[49]

Classical information geometry and its application to physics

Koki Tokeshi. Classical information geometry and its application to physics. UTAP- wiki Seminar, University of Tokyo, 2020

work page 2020
[50]

N. G. Van Kampen. A cumulant expansion for stochastic linear differential equations. I.Physica, 74(2):215–238, 1974

work page 1974
[51]

N. G. Van Kampen.Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. North-Holland, 3rd edition, 2007

work page 2007
[52]

The role of relative entropy in quantum information theory.Reviews of Modern Physics, 74(1):197–234, 2002

Vlatko Vedral. The role of relative entropy in quantum information theory.Reviews of Modern Physics, 74(1):197–234, 2002

work page 2002
[53]

Wald.General Relativity

Robert M. Wald.General Relativity. University of Chicago Press, 1984

work page 1984
[54]

Cam- bridge University Press, 1995

Steven Weinberg.The Quantum Theory of Fields: Volume 1, Foundations. Cam- bridge University Press, 1995

work page 1995
[55]

Robert E. Wyatt. Quantum wave packet dynamics with trajectories: Wave function synthesis along quantum paths.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 111(10):4406– 4413, 1999. 19

work page 1999