arxiv: 2603.25777 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-26 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph · cs.AI

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Challenges and opportunities for AI to help deliver fusion energy

Adriano Agnello , Helen Brooks , Cyd Cowley , Iulia Georgescu , Alex Higginbottom , Richard Pearson , Tara Shears , Melanie Windridge

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph cs.AI

keywords AIfusion energymachine learningplasma physicscollaborationresponsible AIchallengesopportunities

0 comments

The pith

AI can advance fusion energy research when responsible methodologies are developed through sustained expert collaborations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that AI tools hold real potential to accelerate fusion R&D and deliver worldwide clean-energy gains once fusion power is achieved. It identifies distinct challenges that arise when AI is applied to fusion problems and shows that many of those challenges can be reduced by embedding robust, responsible methods into existing workflows. The authors stress that not every fusion task is suitable for AI and that the required safeguards only emerge from long-term, close partnerships between fusion domain specialists and AI practitioners. This perspective expands on a 2025 roundtable discussion to map both opportunities and practical limits.

Core claim

What carries the argument

Responsible and robust AI methodologies embedded through close, long-term collaborations between fusion domain experts and AI developers.

If this is right

Targeted AI applications in data analysis, simulation, and control can shorten fusion R&D timelines when paired with domain oversight.
Global benefits from fusion power become more attainable once AI challenges are systematically reduced.
Fusion teams that integrate responsible methodologies early avoid inefficiencies from applying AI to unsuitable problems.
Awareness that some fusion tasks are better handled by traditional methods prevents misallocation of resources.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Fusion facilities could adopt formal checklists for AI suitability before tool selection to reduce trial-and-error costs.
The collaboration model described could be tested by tracking joint publications or shared project outcomes over five-year periods.
Similar expert-AI pairing strategies may transfer to other high-stakes engineering domains facing data and uncertainty challenges.
Without such pairings, the rate of AI-driven progress in fusion may remain lower than technical capability alone would suggest.

Load-bearing premise

Close, long-term collaborations between fusion domain experts and AI developers will effectively identify and mitigate the specific challenges of applying AI to fusion problems.

What would settle it

Repeated cases where AI tools are deployed in fusion research without measurable gains in speed, accuracy, or safety despite documented expert involvement, or clear failures traceable to unaddressed AI-specific risks.

read the original abstract

There is great potential for the application of AI tools in fusion research, and substantial worldwide benefit if fusion power is realised. However, using AI comes with its own challenges, many of which can be mitigated if responsible and robust methodologies are built into existing approaches. To do that requires close, long-term collaborations between fusion domain experts and AI developers and awareness of the fact that not all problems in fusion research are best tackled with AI tools. In April 2025, experts from academia, industry, UKAEA and STFC discussed how AI can be used to advance R&D in fusion energy at the first edition of The Economist FusionFest event. This Perspective is an expanded and updated summary of the round table discussion, providing more context and examples.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a perspective piece summarizing a roundtable discussion on AI for fusion; it introduces no new methods, data, or results.

read the letter

The core takeaway is that this paper is an expanded write-up of expert opinions from a 2025 roundtable at The Economist FusionFest. It flags familiar points: AI could speed up plasma modeling, materials discovery, and control systems, but fusion data is scarce, models need to be trustworthy, and not every problem suits machine learning. The text correctly notes that effective use will require sustained collaboration between domain physicists and AI researchers rather than one-off projects. That framing is reasonable and reflects real constraints in the field. What it does well is keep the discussion grounded in practical fusion realities instead of generic AI hype. The authors draw on participants from UKAEA and STFC, which adds some credibility to the listed challenges around data quality and interpretability. The soft spots are straightforward. Everything stays qualitative and high-level with no worked examples, no comparison of specific AI techniques against traditional methods, and no attempt to measure potential gains. The claim that challenges can be mitigated through better methodologies and collaborations is asserted without evidence of what those methodologies would actually look like or whether they have worked elsewhere. Because the piece rests entirely on discussion consensus, its value is limited to orientation rather than advancing any technical argument. This is the sort of overview that might help a newcomer get the lay of the land, but it will not change how anyone does research. I would not bring it to a methods-focused reading group. It does not merit peer review as original work; a journal could publish it as a short perspective if they want the topic covered, but it does not require referee scrutiny.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a perspective article that summarizes and expands upon discussions from a roundtable at the first Economist FusionFest event in April 2025. It claims there is substantial potential for AI tools to advance fusion R&D, with worldwide benefits if fusion power is realized, but that AI introduces challenges best addressed by embedding responsible and robust methodologies into existing approaches. This in turn requires sustained collaborations between fusion domain experts and AI developers, together with recognition that not all fusion problems are optimally solved with AI. The text draws on input from academia, industry, UKAEA and STFC participants and supplies additional context and examples.

Significance. If the expert consensus presented holds, the paper offers a timely, field-specific overview of AI opportunities and pitfalls in fusion energy research. By highlighting the need for interdisciplinary collaboration and selective application of AI, it can help shape responsible research practices and accelerate progress toward practical fusion power, which carries clear global energy benefits.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract and introduction refer to the April 2025 roundtable; confirm the exact date and venue details for accuracy and add a footnote or reference if the event proceedings are publicly available.
[Discussion] While the text notes that not all fusion problems suit AI, it would strengthen the argument to include one or two brief, concrete counter-examples of problems where traditional methods remain preferable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and accurate summary of our perspective article, which captures the key themes from the FusionFest roundtable discussion. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision and the recognition of the manuscript's timeliness in highlighting both opportunities and responsible practices for AI in fusion energy R&D. No specific major comments were provided in the report, so we have no detailed points to rebut or revise on substance. We will use the revision opportunity to perform a light polish for clarity and to ensure all examples remain current.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper is a perspective summarizing roundtable discussions on AI in fusion energy. It contains no equations, derivations, predictions, fitted parameters, or technical claims that could reduce to inputs by construction. Claims rest on expert consensus from the event rather than any self-referential modeling step, self-citation chain, or ansatz. No load-bearing element matches any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a non-technical perspective paper with no mathematical derivations, empirical models, or quantitative claims. It draws on expert opinion rather than formal axioms or parameters.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5440 in / 1069 out tokens · 33343 ms · 2026-05-15T00:37:56.747483+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

This Perspective is an expanded and updated summary of the round table discussion, providing more context and examples.
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

AI methods work by identifying patterns and correlations between variables in datasets.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

[1]

IOP 2025 Physics and AI: A physics community perspective URL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18374837

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.18374837 2025
[2]

CATF 2024 A survey of artiﬁcial intelligence and high perfor- mance computing applications to fusion commercialization URL https://www.catf.us/resource/a-survey-of-artiﬁcial-intelligen ce-and-high-performance-computing-applications-to-fusion-

2024
[3]

Williams C K 1998 Prediction with gaussian processes: From linear reg ression to linear prediction and beyond Learning in graphical models (Springer) pp 599–621

1998
[4]

Subbotin G F, Sorokin D I, Nurgaliev M R, Granovskiy A A, Kharitono v I P, Adishchev E V, Khairutdinov E N, Clark R, Shen H, Choi W, Barr J and Orlov D M 2025 arXiv e-prints arXiv:2506.13267 ( Preprint 2506.13267)

work page arXiv 2025
[5]

Battye M I and Perinpanayagam S 2025 IEEE Access 13 75787–75821

2025
[6]

Zanisi L, Ho A, Barr J, Madula T, Citrin J, Pamela S, Buchanan J, Ca sson F, Gopakumar V and Contributors J 2024 Nuclear Fusion 64 036022

2024
[7]

Pfau D, Davies I, Borsa D, Araujo J G M, Tracey B and van Hasselt H 2025 arXiv e-prints arXiv:2505.00663 ( Preprint 2505.00663)

work page arXiv 2025
[8]

Duval B P and et al 2024 Nuclear Fusion 64 112023

2024
[9]

2025 arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.22904

Choi Y, Cheung S W, Kim Y, Tsai P H, Diaz A N, Zanardi I, Chung S W, Copeland D M, Kendrick C, Anderson W et al. 2025 arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.22904

work page arXiv 2025
[10]

2024 Nuclear Fusion 64 056025

Gopakumar V, Pamela S, Zanisi L, Li Z, Gray A, Brennand D, Bha tia N, Stathopoulos G, Kusner M, Peter Deisenroth M et al. 2024 Nuclear Fusion 64 056025

2024
[11]

Noh H, Lee J and Yoon E 2025 Journal of Computational Physics 523 113665 Challenges and opportunities for AI to help deliver fusion e nergy 19

2025
[12]

Adepu A, Gayatri M, Ramanjineyulu H, Donthi R K, Prasad G V an d Sowjanya P 2025 The European Physical Journal Plus 140 1141

2025
[13]

Kovachki N, Li Z, Liu B, Azizzadenesheli K, Bhattacharya K, S tuart A and Anandkumar A 2023 Journal of Machine Learning Research 24 1–97

2023
[14]

Li Z, Kovachki N, Azizzadenesheli K, Liu B, Bhattacharya K, S tuart A and Anandkumar A 2020 arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.08895

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020
[15]

Carey N, Zanisi L, Pamela S, Gopakumar V, Omotani J, Buchana n J, Brandstetter J, Paischer F, Galletti G and Setinek P 2025 arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17386

work page arXiv 2025
[16]

Rahman M M, Bai Z, King J R, Sovinec C R, Wei X, Williams S and Liu Y 202 4 Physics of Plasmas 31
[17]

Churchill R M 2025 Frontiers in Physics 12 1531334

2025
[18]

Yuan J, Gao H, Dai D, Luo J, Zhao L, Zhang Z, Xie Z, Wei Y X, Wang L, Xiao Z, Wang Y, Ruan C, Zhang M, Liang W and Zeng W 2025 arXiv e-prints arXiv:2502.11089 (Preprint 2502.11089)

work page arXiv 2025
[19]

Lewis P, Perez E, Piktus A, Petroni F, Karpukhin V, Goyal N, K¨ uttler H, Lewis M, Yih W t, Rockt¨ aschel T, Riedel S and Kiela D 2020 Retrieval-augment ed generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems NIPS ’20 (Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran Associates Inc.) ISBN 9781713829546

2020
[20]

2025 Nature Communications 16 8877

Wang A M, Pau A, Rea C, So O, Dawson C, Sauter O, Boyer M D, Vu A , Galperti C, Fan C et al. 2025 Nature Communications 16 8877

2025
[21]

Holt G K, Keats A, Pamela S, Kryjak M, Agnello A, Amorisco N C, Dud son B D and Smyrnakis M 2024 Nuclear Fusion 64 086009

2024
[22]

Shukla V, Bandyopadhyay M and Karelia N 2025 Chapter 11 - critic al research opportunities in ml/ai applications for fusion energy and plasma devices Energy From Plasma ed Yasin G, Nguyen D B, Gupta R K, Ajmal S and Nguyen T A (Woodhead Publishing) pp 325– 344 ISBN 978-0- 443-26584-6 URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article /pii/B9780443265846000117

2025
[23]

International Atomic Energy Agency 2025 IAEA world fusion ou tlook 2025 https://www.iaea.org/publications/15935/iaea-world-fusion-out look-2025

2025
[24]

Auer A, Podest P, Klotz D, B¨ ock S, Klambauer G and Hochreiter S 2025 arXiv e-prints arXiv:2505.23719 ( Preprint 2505.23719)

work page arXiv 2025
[25]

Fatir Ansari A, Shchur O, K¨ uken J, Auer A, Han B, Mercado P, Sundar Rangapuram S, Shen H, Stella L, Zhang X, Goswami M, Kapoor S, Maddix D C, Guerron P, Hu T, Yin J, Erickson N, Mutalik Desai P, Wang H, Rangwala H, Karypis G, Wang Y and Bohlke- Schneider M 2025 arXiv e-prints arXiv:2510.15821 ( Preprint 2510.15821)

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[26]

Hollmann N, M¨ uller S, Purucker L, Krishnakumar A, K¨ orfer M, H oo S B, Schirrmeister R T and Hutter F 2025 Nature 637 319–326

2025
[27]

Qu J, Holzm¨ uller D, Varoquaux G and Le Morvan M 2025 arXiv e-prints arXiv:2502.05564 (Preprint 2502.05564)

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

Ekambaram V, Kumar S, Jati A, Mukherjee S, Sakai T, Dayama P, Giﬀord W M and Kalagnanam J 2025 arXiv e-prints arXiv:2505.13033 ( Preprint 2505.13033)

work page arXiv 2025
[29]

Zhang X, Maddix D C, Yin J, Erickson N, Fatir Ansari A, Han B, Zha ng S, Akoglu L, Faloutsos C, Mahoney M W, Hu C, Rangwala H, Karypis G and Wang B 202 5 arXiv e-prints arXiv:2510.21204 ( Preprint 2510.21204)

work page arXiv
[30]

DeepSeek-AI 2024 arXiv e-prints arXiv:2412.19437 ( Preprint 2412.19437)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[31]

Loreti A, Chen K, George R, Firth R, Agnello A and Tanaka S 2025 arXiv e-prints arXiv:2504.07738 ( Preprint 2504.07738)

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[32]

Yang Z, Zhong W, Xia F, Gao Z, Zhu X, Li J, Hu L, Xu Z, Li D, Zheng G, Chen Y, Zhang J, Li B, Zhang X, Zhu Y, Tong R, Dong Y, Zhang Y, Yuan B, Yu X, He Z, Tian W , Gong X and Xu M 2025 Nuclear Fusion 65 026030

2025
[33]

Yu Y, Guo B Q, Meng L Y, Li K D, Wu K, Yu L, Duan Y M, Xu G S, Sang C F and Wang L 2025 Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 67 025026 Challenges and opportunities for AI to help deliver fusion e nergy 20

2025
[34]

Noh H, Lee J and Yoon E 2025 Journal of Computational Physics 523 113665

2025
[35]

Howard N T, Rodriguez-Fernandez P, Holland C and Candy J 2025 Nuclear Fusion 65 016002 (Preprint 2404.17040)

work page arXiv 2025
[36]

Zhou Z, Li L, Chen X and Li A 2023 arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.08189

work page arXiv 2023
[37]

UK Government 2025 AI Opportunities Action Plan https://www.g ov.uk/government/publications/ai-opportunities-action-

2025
[38]

UK Government 2025 The UK’s Modern Industrial Strategy https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/industrial-strategy

2025
[39]

Plociennik M, Rausch A, Santa Cruz M and Triana J 2024 D2.3 - ﬁnal communication, training, outreach, dissemination and collaboration/liaison and exploitation pla ns and results URL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11485073

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.11485073 2024
[40]

European Parliament, Council of the European Union 2024 Regu lation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down h armonised rules on artiﬁcial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (E U) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, ...

2024
[41]

von Ungern-Sternberg; Lea Katharina Kumkar; Thomas R¨ uf ner; Joanna Bryson; Patricia Garc ´ ıa Majado; Tobias Mahler; Irina Orssich; Lea Ossmann-Magiera; Lisa M arkschies; Tristan Radtke; David Restrepo Amariles; Margaret Hu; I-Ping Wang B R A 2025 Artiﬁcial Intelligence and Fundamental Rights ISBN 9783565013197

2025
[42]

Executive Oﬃce of the President of the United States 2025 Ame rica’s AI Action Plan https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Americas-AI-Action-Plan.pdf

2025
[43]

Executive Oﬃce of the President of the United States 2025 Adv ancing United States Leadership in Artiﬁcial Intelligence Infrastructure https://www.federalregis ter.gov/d/2025-01395

2025
[44]

Executive Oﬃce of the President of the United States 2025 Acc elerating Federal Permitting of Data Center Infrastructure https://www.federalregister.gov/ d/2025-14212

2025
[45]

International Energy Agency 2025 Energy and AI https://ww w.iea.org/reports/energy-and-ai

2025
[46]

UK Government 2025 Memorandum of Understanding between t he Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United King dom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland regarding the Technology Pros perity Deal https://www.gov.uk/government/news/memorandum-of-understanding-between-the-government-of-the-united-states-

2025
[47]

Knaster J, Chel S, Fischer U, Groeschel F, Heidinger R, Ibarr a A, Micciche G, M¨ oslang A, Sugimoto M and Wakai E 2014 Journal of Nuclear Materials 453 115–119

2014
[48]

Wilkinson M D and et al 2016 Scientiﬁc Data 3 160018 ISSN 2052-4463 URL https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

work page doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18 2016
[49]

Barbarino M 2021 Communications Physics 4 ISSN 2399-3650 URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-021-00764-4

work page doi:10.1038/s42005-021-00764-4 2021
[50]

Cipcigan F, Booth J, Neumann Barros Ferreira R, Ribeiro dos San tos C and Steiner M 2023 arXiv e-prints arXiv:2310.07671 ( Preprint 2310.07671)

work page arXiv 2023
[51]

Vega J, Murari A, Dormido-Canto S, Ratt´ a G A and Gelfusa M 20 22 Nature Physics 18 741–750
[52]

2025 Nuclear Fusion 65 086021

Shousha R, Kim S, Erickson K G, Hahn S H, Nelson A O, Logan N C, Ya ng S, Hu Q, Wilcox R, Park J K et al. 2025 Nuclear Fusion 65 086021

2025
[53]

Carlstrom T 2005 Fusion science and technology 48 997–1010

2005
[54]

2022 Nature 602 414–419

Degrave J, Felici F, Buchli J, Neunert M, Tracey B, Carpanese F, Ewalds T, Hafner R, Abdolmaleki A, de Las Casas D et al. 2022 Nature 602 414–419

2022
[55]

Bachmann C, Gliss C, Janeschitz G, Steinbacher T and Mozzillo R 20 22 Fusion Engineering and Design 177 113077
[56]

Shi S, Wu H, Song Y and Handroos H 2017 Industrial Robot: An International Journal 44 711–719

2017
[57]

Gilbert M R, Arakawa K, Bergstrom Z, Caturla M J, Dudarev S L, G ao F, Goryaeva A M, Hu S Y, Hu X, Kurtz R J, Litnovsky A, Marian J, Marinica M C, Martin ez E, Marquis E A, Mason D R, Nguyen B N, Olsson P, Osetskiy Y, Senor D, Se tyawan W, Challenges and opportunities for AI to help deliver fusion e nergy 21 Short M P, Suzudo T, Trelewicz J R, Tsuru T, Wa...

2021
[58]

Humphrey L R, Dubas A J, Fletcher L C and Davis A 2024 Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 66 025002

2024
[59]

Humphrey L, Brooks H, Mungale S, Davis A and Foster D 2026 Frontiers in Nuclear Engineering 4 ISSN 2813-3412 URL https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/nuclear-engineering/articles/10.3389/fnuen.2025.1694684

work page doi:10.3389/fnuen.2025.1694684 2026
[60]

Sobes V, Hiscox B, Popov E, Archibald R, Hauck C, Betzler B and T errani K 2021 Scientiﬁc Reports 11 19646 ISSN 2045-2322 URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021 -98037-1

work page doi:10.1038/s41598-021 2021
[61]

Grieves M and Vickers J 2017 Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emer gent Behavior in Complex Systems (Cham: Springer International Publishing) pp 85–113 ISBN 978- 3-319-38756-7 URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38756 -7 4

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-38756 2017
[62]

Capellari G, Chatzi E and Mariani S 2016 Optimal sensor placeme nt through bayesian experimental design: Eﬀect of measurement noise and number of sensors Proceedings vol 1 (MDPI) p 41

2016
[63]

2021 Nature Reviews Physics 3 685–697

Noack M M, Zwart P H, Ushizima D M, Fukuto M, Yager K G, Elbert K C , Murray C B, Stein A, Doerk G S, Tsai E H et al. 2021 Nature Reviews Physics 3 685–697

2021
[64]

2024 Physics of Plasmas 31 012303

Hornsby W, Gray A, Buchanan J, Patel B, Kennedy D, Casson F , Roach C, Lykkegaard M, Nguyen H, Papadimas N et al. 2024 Physics of Plasmas 31 012303

2024
[65]

Agnello A, Amorisco N C, Keats A, Holt G K, Buchanan J, Pamela S, V incent C and McArdle G 2024 Physics of Plasmas 31 043901 ( Preprint 2403.18912)

work page arXiv 2024
[66]

Chakrabarty A, Bortoﬀ S A and Laughman C R 2022 IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 53 2629–2640

2022
[67]

Sammuli B, Olofsson E, Neiser T, Orozco D, Clark C, Akcay C et al. 2024 Enhancing fusion research with toksearch: updates and integration into the fusion data platf orm 14th IAEA Technical Meeting on Control Systems, Data Acquisition, Data Managem ent and Remote Participation in Fusion Research pp 15–18

2024
[68]

J¨ arvinen A, F¨ ul¨ op T, Hirvijoki E, Hoppe M, Kit A and ˚ Astr¨ om J 2022 arXiv e-prints arXiv:2208.01858 ( Preprint 2208.01858)

work page arXiv 2022
[69]

Pavone A, Merlo A, Kwak S and Svensson J 2023 Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 65 053001 URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/acc60f

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6587/acc60f 2023
[70]

Kwak S, Svensson J, Bozhenkov S, Flanagan J, Kempenaars M, Boboc A, Ghim Y C and Contributors J 2020 Nuclear Fusion 60 046009

2020
[71]

Juven A, Aumeunier M H and Marot J 2024 Nuclear Materials and Energy 38 101562

2024
[72]

Wei Y, Levesque J, Hansen C, Mauel M and Navratil G 2023 Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 65 074002

2023
[73]

Zinkle S J and Busby J T 2009 Materials today 12 12–19

2009
[74]

Alba R, Iglesias R and Cerdeira M ´A 2022 Materials 15 6591

2022
[75]

https://www.iter.org/node/20687/ai-ignites-innovation-fus ion
[76]

https://www.ornl.gov/news/researchers-build-ai-model-dat abase-ﬁnd-new-alloys-nuclear-fusion-facilities
[77]

Cohen-Tanugi D, Stapelberg M G, Short M P, Ferry S E, Whyte D G, Hartwig Z S and Buonassisi T 2024 Matter 7 4148–4160

2024
[78]

Kemp R, Cottrell G, Bhadeshia H, Odette G, Yamamoto T and Kish imoto H 2006 Journal of Nuclear Materials 348 311–328

2006