Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 39 references

Bulk NaMnAs shows a clear 7 meV antiferromagnetic resonance that remains visible at room temperature, confirming easy-axis order along the tetragonal axis.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 17:55 UTC pith:27MTXBSC

load-bearing objection Clean first AFMR data on a room-temperature easy-axis AF semiconductor; the spectroscopy is solid and the anisotropy estimate is correctly labeled as rough.

arxiv 2603.25878 v2 pith:27MTXBSC submitted 2026-03-26 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Room-temperature antiferromagnetic resonance in NaMnAs

Jan Dzian , St\'a\v{n}a T\'azlar\r{u} , Ivan Mohelsk\'y , Florian Le Mardel\'e , Filip Chudoba , Ji\v{r}\'i Voln\'y , Jan Wyzula , Amit Pawbake
show 11 more authors
Simone Ritarossi Riccardo Mazzarello Philipp Ritzinger Jakub \v{Z}elezn\'y Karel V\'yborn\'y Kl\'ara Uhl\'i\v{r}ov\'a Beno\^it Gr\'emaud Andr\'es Sa\'ul Cl\'ement Faugeras Martin Veis Milan Orlita
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords antiferromagnetic resonanceNaMnAseasy-axis antiferromagnetTHz magnonsingle-ion anisotropyroom-temperature antiferromagnetismlayered magnetic semiconductor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

NaMnAs is a layered antiferromagnetic semiconductor that orders well above room temperature. This work uses THz magneto-transmission to detect its zero-wavevector magnon. At zero field the resonance sits at 7 meV; with field along the tetragonal axis it splits linearly into two branches, the classic signature of an easy-axis antiferromagnet. The mode softens with temperature but is still clearly present at 295 K. From the measured gap and the known Néel temperature the authors extract a single-ion anisotropy of roughly 0.1–0.2 meV for the manganese ions—larger than typical values in other Mn-based antiferromagnets. The result supplies a concrete, ambient-temperature THz magnetic excitation in an exfoliable crystal and thereby opens a practical materials platform for room-temperature antiferromagnetic spintronics and magnonics.

Core claim

At B = 0 a single antiferromagnetic-resonance line is observed at 7.0 ± 0.2 meV and is identified as the doubly degenerate k = 0 magnon of an easy-axis antiferromagnet whose Néel vector lies along the tetragonal axis. The mode remains clearly visible up to 295 K while softening to 5.4 meV, and the extracted single-ion anisotropy of the Mn ions is 0.1–0.2 meV.

What carries the argument

Kittel’s semiclassical AFMR formulae for easy-axis antiferromagnets: the zero-field gap splits linearly as ω0 ± g µB B∥ when the field is along the easy axis and follows a square-root form when the field is perpendicular; these expressions, together with the linear-spin-wave gap formula relating the gap to single-ion anisotropy D and exchange, convert the measured resonance into a quantitative anisotropy estimate.

Load-bearing premise

The quoted anisotropy of about 0.2 meV rests on a mean-field estimate of the dominant exchange constant taken from the Néel temperature under the assumption that only one exchange path matters and that the spin is S = 2; both steps are order-of-magnitude approximations.

What would settle it

Inelastic neutron scattering that maps the full magnon dispersion at low temperature would either confirm or contradict the predicted gap and the relative strengths of the exchange paths used to extract D.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports frequency-domain THz magneto-transmission experiments on bulk tetragonal NaMnAs crystals. At B = 0 a single resonance is observed at 7.0 ± 0.2 meV; it splits linearly with g≈ 1.99 when B is applied along the tetragonal axis and blueshifts as √(ω₀^{2} + (gμ_B B)^{2}) when B is perpendicular, remaining visible (while softening to 5.4 meV) up to 295 K. These field and temperature dependences are identified with the doubly degenerate k = 0 magnon of an easy-axis C-type antiferromagnet whose Néel vector lies along the c axis, thereby confirming earlier DFT predictions. A rough estimate of the single-ion anisotropy D ≈ 0.1–0.2 meV is extracted from the zero-field gap together with a mean-field J1 derived from TN ≈ 350 K; supporting phonon DFT and exchange calculations are also presented.

Significance. If the spectroscopic identification holds, the work supplies a clean, textbook example of room-temperature easy-axis AFMR in an exfoliable layered semiconductor whose magnon gap lies in the technologically relevant THz window. The data sets (Faraday and Voigt geometries, absolute transmission, and a dense temperature series) are of high quality and match Kittel’s formulas without adjustable parameters beyond g ≈ 2. The phonon DFT (U = 5 eV) reproduces the observed IR bands, and the linear-spin-wave dispersion calculated from the extracted exchanges offers a concrete, falsifiable prediction for future inelastic neutron scattering. These strengths make the paper a useful addition to the still-small catalogue of ambient-temperature antiferromagnetic semiconductors.

minor comments (6)
  1. Abstract and first paragraph of Sec. III: the word “antiferromanetic” is misspelled (missing “g”).
  2. Section headings contain spurious spaces (“EXPERIMENT AL DET AILS”, “EXPERIMENT AL RESUL TS AND DISCUSSION”, “THEORETICAL MODELLING”). These should be corrected for production.
  3. Fig. 2 caption and main text: the multi-phonon feature is labeled “P” while the symmetry labels Eu/A2u follow space group 129; a brief note that DFT finds a weakly lowered symmetry (No. 115) would avoid reader confusion.
  4. Eqs. (4)–(5) and the subsequent D estimate: the text already calls the result an order-of-magnitude figure, yet the abstract quotes a numerical range 0.1–0.2 meV. Adding a one-sentence caveat that the range reflects both the mean-field J1 uncertainty and the DFT cross-check would make the claim more precise.
  5. Fig. 9 and surrounding text: the ad-hoc 3/4 temperature rescaling of the mean-field ω_Γ curve is stated but not motivated. A short remark that the factor compensates for the well-known mean-field overestimate of TN would improve transparency.
  6. Reference [39] (data availability) is incomplete; a DOI or repository link should be supplied.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

No significant circularity: AFMR energy, g-factor and room-temperature visibility are direct spectroscopic measurements; D estimate and mean-field rescaling are post-hoc order-of-magnitude comparisons.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. III, Eqs. (4)–(5) and surrounding text]
    "Assuming that J1 is the leading (antiferromagnetic) exchange interaction … the Néel temperature of TN ≈ 350 K implies a rough estimate of Jexp1 ≈ 4 meV. Taking this, together with the experimentally determined AFMR energy, we obtain the estimate for the single-ion magnetic anisotropy, Dexp ≈ 0.2 meV. Nevertheless, since NaMnAs is a strongly anisotropic material … let us take this as an order-of-magnitude estimate only."

    D is obtained by feeding a mean-field estimate of J1 (itself derived from the known TN under the assumption that J1 dominates) back into the same linear-spin-wave formula that contains the measured AFMR energy. The numerical value of D is therefore partly fixed by construction once TN and ωΓ are given; the paper correctly flags it as order-of-magnitude only and does not rest the mode identification on the precise number.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Sec. IV, paragraph discussing mean-field temperature dependence and Fig. 9]
    "A simple way to take this difficulty into account is to rescale linearly the temperature axis of the calculated mean-field solution to better fit them to the experimental data. … this agreement has been obtained using the rescaling coefficient of 3/4 for the temperature axis of ωΓ."

    The mean-field curves for ωΓ(T) are linearly rescaled by 3/4 after the fact so that they overlie the measured softening. The rescaled curves are then presented as “good agreement,” but the agreement is forced by the free scale factor; the unscaled mean-field TN is known to be inaccurate. This is a minor post-hoc adjustment, not a prediction of the resonance energy itself.

full rationale

The central experimental claims (single AFMR line at 7.0 ± 0.2 meV that splits linearly for B∥c with g ≈ 1.99 and blueshifts as √(ω₀^{2} + (gμB)^{2}) for B⊥c, remaining visible to 295 K while softening to 5.4 meV) are obtained from raw magneto-transmission spectra and Kittel formulas (1–2). They do not depend on any fitted microscopic parameter. The single-ion anisotropy D ≈ 0.1–0.2 meV is derived afterwards by inserting a mean-field J1 ≈ 4 meV (from TN ≈ 350 K) into the linear-spin-wave expression (4); the paper itself labels this an order-of-magnitude estimate and cross-checks it against independent DFT values (Table I). Likewise, U = 5 eV is chosen to match phonon positions and a 3/4 temperature rescaling is applied to mean-field curves only after the data are recorded; neither step forces the measured resonance energy. Self-citations to prior work on the same crystals supply background TN and crystal structure but are not load-bearing for the spectroscopic identification. No equation equates the claimed 7 meV line to a fitted input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The experimental AFMR line position and its field/temperature dependence stand on standard spectroscopic practice and Kittel’s semiclassical formulas. The numerical value of D rests on two additional inputs: a mean-field conversion of TN into J1 and the choice S = 2. DFT parameters (U = 5 eV, relaxed cell) are tuned to phonons and then used for exchange constants; a 3/4 temperature rescaling is applied to mean-field curves. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (4)
  • Hubbard U = 5 eV
    Chosen as U = 5 eV because it gives the best match of calculated IR-active phonon energies to the measured transmission spectrum (Fig. 6).
  • single-ion anisotropy D = 0.1–0.2 meV
    Extracted from the measured zero-field AFMR energy together with an estimated J1; two values (0.1 meV from DFT Ji, 0.2 meV from mean-field J1) are quoted.
  • mean-field temperature rescaling factor = 3/4
    Linear rescaling of the calculated mean-field temperature axis by 3/4 to improve agreement with the measured ωΓ(T) curve (Fig. 9).
  • effective spin S = 2
    Set to S = 2 (instead of the free-ion 5/2) on the basis of the reported magnetic moment ≈ 4 µB and prior literature on NaMnAs.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Kittel’s semiclassical AFMR formulas for easy-axis antiferromagnets (linear splitting for B∥, quadratic for B⊥) correctly describe the observed modes.
    Invoked throughout Sec. III (Eqs. 1–2) to identify the resonance and extract g-factors.
  • domain assumption Mean-field relation kB TN ≈ (S+1)S/3 × (4J1 – 4J2 – 2J3 + 8J4) yields a usable estimate of the dominant exchange when J1 is assumed largest.
    Used in Sec. III (Eq. 5) to convert TN ≈ 350 K into J1 ≈ 4 meV before inserting into the spin-wave gap formula.
  • standard math Linear spin-wave theory on the four-exchange Heisenberg Hamiltonian plus single-ion anisotropy gives the correct Γ-point magnon energy ωΓ = 2S √[D(D + 4J1 + 8J4)].
    Derived in Sec. III (Eq. 4) and used both for the experimental D estimate and for the SpinW dispersion plots.
  • domain assumption The crystal remains an easy-axis antiferromagnet with the same magnetic structure from 4 K to 295 K.
    Inferred from the persistence of the characteristic two-branch Faraday pattern up to room temperature (Fig. 5).

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 17579 in / 3032 out tokens · 29812 ms · 2026-07-13T17:55:40.641936+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Room-temperature antiferromagnetic resonance in NaMnAs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/27MTXBSC

@misc{pith2026260325878,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Room-temperature antiferromagnetic resonance in NaMnAs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/27MTXBSC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.25878}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We report on antiferromagnetic resonance experiments in bulk tetragonal NaMnAs -- a room-temperature antiferromagnetic semiconductor. Our results corroborate previous ab initio studies, which propose that NaMnAs is an easy-axis antiferromagnet with the N\'eel vector oriented along the tetragonal axis. At $ B = 0 $, we find a single antiferromagnetic resonance line at 7 meV and associate it with a doubly degenerate ($ k = 0 $) magnon mode. Its energy softens considerably with increasing $ T $, but remains clearly visible in the data up to room temperature. From the experimental data, we estimate the single-ion anisotropy of the Mn ions in NaMnAs in the range 0.1-0.2 meV, a value that is relatively large compared to other manganese-based antiferromagnets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.25878 by Amit Pawbake, Andr\'es Sa\'ul, Beno\^it Gr\'emaud, Cl\'ement Faugeras, Filip Chudoba, Florian Le Mardel\'e, Ivan Mohelsk\'y, Jakub \v{Z}elezn\'y, Jan Dzian, Jan Wyzula, Ji\v{r}\'i Voln\'y, Karel V\'yborn\'y, Kl\'ara Uhl\'i\v{r}ov\'a, Martin Veis, Milan Orlita, Philipp Ritzinger, Riccardo Mazzarello, Simone Ritarossi, St\'a\v{n}a T\'azlar\r{u}.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic spin structure of NaMnAs magnetic crystal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Infrared magneto-transmission of NaMnAs bulk crystal measured with the magnetic field applied along the tetragonal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Panel (a): Color-plot of infrared magneto-transmission taken on a NaMnAs bulk crystal in the Voigt configuration, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. THz magneto-transmission of bulk NaMnAs, measured in the Faraday configuration at temperatures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Normalized IR spectra of NaMnAs based on DFT+U [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Left panel: magnon dispersion in NaMnAs for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The magnon energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Magnon energy, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    B.Kuhlow,MagneticorderinginCrCl 3 atthephasetran- sition, phys. stat. sol. (a)72, 161 (1982)

    1982

  2. [2]

    Tsubokawa, On the magnetic properties of a CrBr3 single crystal, J

    I. Tsubokawa, On the magnetic properties of a CrBr3 single crystal, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.15, 1664 (1960)

    1960

  3. [3]

    Dillon, J

    J. Dillon, J. F. and C. E. Olson, Magnetization, reso- nance, and optical properties of the ferromagnet CrI3, J. Appl. Phys. 36, 1259 (1965)

    1965

  4. [4]

    J. M. Fletcher, W. E. Gardner, A. C. Fox, and G. Top- ping, X-ray, infrared, and magnetic studies of α- and β-ruthenium trichloride, J. Chem. Soc. A , 1038 (1967)

    1967

  5. [5]

    D. Juza, D. Giegling, and H. Schäfer, Über die vanad- injodide VJ2 und VJ3, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.366, 121 (1969)

    1969

  6. [6]

    Okuda, K

    K. Okuda, K. Kurosawa, S. Saito, M. Honda, Z. Yu, and M. Date, Magnetic properties of layered compound MnPS3, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.55, 4456 (1986)

    1986

  7. [7]

    Taylor, J

    B. Taylor, J. Steger, A. Wold, and E. Kostiner, Prepa- ration and properties of iron phosphorus triselenide, FePSe3, Inorg. Chem.13, 2719 (1974)

    1974

  8. [8]

    Brec, Review on structural and chemical properties of transition metal phosphorus trisulfides MPS3, inInterca- lation in Layered Materials , edited by M

    R. Brec, Review on structural and chemical properties of transition metal phosphorus trisulfides MPS3, inInterca- lation in Layered Materials , edited by M. S. Dresselhaus (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1986) pp. 93–124

    1986

  9. [9]

    Bronger, P

    W. Bronger, P. Müller, R. Höppner, and H.-U. Schuster, Zur charakterisierung der magnetischen eigenschaften von NaMnP, NaMnAs, NaMnSb, NaMnBi, LiMnAs und KMnAs über neutronenbeugungsexperimente, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 539, 175 (1986)

    1986

  10. [10]

    Volný, K

    J. Volný, K. Charvátová, M. Veis, V. Holý, M. Von- dráček, J. Honolka, E. Duverger-Nédellec, J. Schusser, S. W. D’Souza, J. Minár, J. M. Pientka, A. Mar- modoro, K. Výborný, and K. Uhlířová, Single-crystal studies and electronic structure investigation of the room-temperature semiconductor NaMnAs, Phys. Rev. B 105, 125204 (2022)

    2022

  11. [11]

    C. V. Ha, S. Keovongsa, A. Reyes-Serrato, J. Guerrero- Sanchez, and D. M. Hoat, A systematic study of the NaMnAs half-heusler compound from bulk to (001) sur- faces as promising spintronic materials, RSC Adv. 15, 16845 (2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    W. Zhou, S. Wu, and S. Li, First-principles study of the magnetic and electronic properties of AMnAs (A=Li, Na, 9 K, Rb, Cs), J. Magn. Magn. Mat420, 19 (2016)

    2016

  13. [13]

    Blundell, Magnetism in condensed matter (OUP Ox- ford, 2001)

    S. Blundell, Magnetism in condensed matter (OUP Ox- ford, 2001)

    2001

  14. [14]

    Achenbach and H.-U

    G. Achenbach and H.-U. Schuster, Ternäre verbindungen des lithiums und natriums mit mangan und elementen der 5. hauptgruppe, Zeitschrift für anorganische und all- gemeine Chemie 475, 9 (1981)

    1981

  15. [15]

    D. L. Rousseau, R. P. Bauman, and S. P. S. Porto, Nor- mal mode determination in crystals, J. Raman Spectrosc. 10, 253 (1981)

    1981

  16. [16]

    Ivantchev, E

    S. Ivantchev, E. Kroumova, G. Madariaga, J. M. Pérez- Mato, and M. I. Aroyo, SUBGROUPGRAPH: a com- puter program for analysis of group–subgroup relations between space groups, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 33, 1190 (2000)

    2000

  17. [17]

    Y. J. Um, J. T. Park, B. H. Min, Y. J. Song, Y. S. Kwon, B. Keimer, and M. Le Tacon, Raman scattering study of the lattice dynamics of superconducting LiFeAs, Phys. Rev. B 85, 012501 (2012)

    2012

  18. [18]

    Kittel, Theory of antiferromagnetic resonance, Phys

    C. Kittel, Theory of antiferromagnetic resonance, Phys. Rev. 82, 565 (1951)

    1951

  19. [19]

    Keffer and C

    F. Keffer and C. Kittel, Theory of antiferromagnetic res- onance, Phys. Rev.85, 329 (1952)

    1952

  20. [20]

    S. M. Rezende, A. Azevedo, and R. L. Rodríguez-Suárez, Introduction to antiferromagnetic magnons, J. Appl. Phys. 126, 151101 (2019)

    2019

  21. [21]

    Szuszkiewicz, E

    W. Szuszkiewicz, E. Dynowska, B. Witkowska, and B. Hennion, Spin-wave measurements on hexagonal MnTe of NiAs-type structure by inelastic neutron scat- tering, Phys. Rev. B73, 104403 (2006)

    2006

  22. [22]

    Pepy, Spin waves in MnO; from 4◦K to temperatures close to TN, J

    G. Pepy, Spin waves in MnO; from 4◦K to temperatures close to TN, J. Phys. Chem. Solids35, 433 (1974)

    1974

  23. [23]

    Hagiwara, K

    M. Hagiwara, K. Katsumata, H. Yamaguchi, M. Toku- naga, I. Yamada, M. Gross, and P. Goy, A com- plete frequency-field chart for the antiferromagnetic res- onance in MnF2, J. Infrared Millim. Terahertz Waves20, 617–622 (1999)

    1999

  24. [24]

    A. R. Wildes, B. Roessli, B. Lebech, and K. W. God- frey, Spin waves and the critical behaviour of the mag- netization in MnPS3, J. Phys. Condens. Matter10, 6417 (1998)

    1998

  25. [25]

    S. Liu, A. Granados del Águila, D. Bhowmick, C. K. Gan, T. Thu Ha Do, M. A. Prosnikov, D. Sedmidub- ský, Z. Sofer, P. C. M. Christianen, P. Sengupta, and Q. Xiong, Direct observation of magnon-phonon strong coupling in two-dimensional antiferromagnet at high magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 097401 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    Vaclavkova, M

    D. Vaclavkova, M. Palit, J. Wyzula, S. Ghosh, A. Del- homme, S. Maity, P. Kapuscinski, A. Ghosh, M. Veis, M. Grzeszczyk, C. Faugeras, M. Orlita, S. Datta, and M. Potemski, Magnon polarons in the van der Waals an- tiferromagnet FePS3, Phys. Rev. B104, 134437 (2021)

    2021

  27. [27]

    Zhang, M

    Q. Zhang, M. Ozerov, E. V. Boström, J. Cui, N. Suri, Q.Jiang, C.Wang, F.Wu, K.Hwangbo, J.-H.Chu, et al., Coherent strong-coupling of terahertz magnons and phonons in a Van der Waals antiferromagnetic insulator, preprint, arXiv:2108.11619 10.48550/arXiv.2108.11619 (2021)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.11619 2021

  28. [28]

    J. Cui, E. V. Boström, M. Ozerov, F. Wu, Q. Jiang, J.- H. Chu, C. Li, F. Liu, X. Xu, A. Rubio, and Q. Zhang, Chirality selective magnon-phonon hybridization and magnon-induced chiral phonons in a layered zigzag an- tiferromagnet, Nature Commun.14, 3396 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    A. E. Mendili and M. E. Zhitomirsky, Quantum- classical correspondence for spins at finite tempera- tures with application to monte carlo simulations (2026), arXiv:2602.16501 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Achenbach and H.-U

    G. Achenbach and H.-U. Schuster, Ternäre verbindungen des lithiums und natriums mit mangan und elementen der 5. hauptgruppe, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.475, 9 (1981)

    1981

  31. [31]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S. S...

    2009

  32. [32]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Gi- annozzi, Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515–562 (2001)

    2001

  33. [33]

    Toth and B

    S. Toth and B. Lake, Linear spin wave theory for single-q incommensurate magnetic structures, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 27, 166002 (2015)

    2015

  34. [34]

    Köbler, Bosonic and magnonic magnon dispersions, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 502, 166533 (2020)

    U. Köbler, Bosonic and magnonic magnon dispersions, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 502, 166533 (2020)

    2020

  35. [35]

    Köbler, A

    U. Köbler, A. Hoser, and W. Schäfer, On the tempera- ture dependence of the magnetic excitations, Physica B Condens. Matter 364, 55 (2005)

    2005

  36. [36]

    Köbler and A

    U. Köbler and A. Hoser,Renormalization group theory: impact on experimental magnetism (Springer Science & Business Media – Springer, New York, 2010)

    2010

  37. [37]

    Rajeev Pavizhakumari, T

    V. Rajeev Pavizhakumari, T. Skovhus, and T. Olsen, Be- yond the random phase approximation for calculating curie temperatures in ferromagnets: application to Fe, Ni, Co and monolayer CrI3, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 37, 115806 (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    S. L. Holm, A. Kreisel, T. K. Schäffer, A. Bakke, M. Ber- telsen, U. B. Hansen, M. Retuerto, J. Larsen, D. Prab- hakaran, P. P. Deen, Z. Yamani, J. O. Birk, U. Stuhr, C. Niedermayer, A. L. Fennell, B. M. Andersen, and K. Lefmann, Magnetic ground state and magnon-phonon interaction in multiferroic h-YMnO3, Phys. Rev. B97, 134304 (2018)

    2018

  39. [39]

    Veis, Room-temperature antiferromagnetic resonance in NaMnAs (2026)

    M. Veis, Room-temperature antiferromagnetic resonance in NaMnAs (2026)

    2026