Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 cited by

Local driving of an Ising-like spin chain produces scalable, site-addressable phonon lasers that self-synchronize without a shared bus.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 20:00 UTC pith:JJMKMT76

load-bearing objection Abstract promises a modular, locally driven phonon-laser array with site-selective lasing and self-organized sync; the supplied full text is the wrong paper (VueBuds), so the claims cannot be audited. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2603.29099 v1 pith:JJMKMT76 submitted 2026-03-31 quant-ph

Scalable phonon-laser arrays with self-organized synchronization

classification quant-ph
keywords phonon laserself-organized synchronizationIsing spin chainlocal drivingquantum optomechanicssite-selective lasingmechanical oscillators
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that arrays of mechanical oscillators can be turned into individually addressable phonon lasers by driving them locally through an Ising-like spin chain, rather than by coupling every oscillator to one shared field. Resonance conditions mark the point at which each oscillator leaves thermal motion and enters sustained coherent self-oscillation. Because the drive is purely local, the architecture is modular: any site can be switched on or off by toggling its spin–mechanical coupling, provided the resonance conditions hold. Near resonance the array remains robust to small frequency mismatches and spontaneously develops pairwise synchronization and global phase locking. The authors argue this removes the two main barriers of earlier phonon-laser proposals—lack of scalability and inability to select which sites lase—and sketch an implementation that fits existing experimental platforms.

Core claim

Scalable arrays of individually addressable phonon lasers arise from purely local driving of a quantum many-body Ising-like spin chain; rigorously derived resonance conditions govern the transition of each mechanical oscillator from thermal motion to sustained coherent self-oscillation, enabling on-demand site-selective lasing and spontaneous pairwise and global synchronization without a common coupling bus.

What carries the argument

Local spin–mechanical couplings under stated resonance conditions: each site’s mechanical oscillator is driven only by its own spin, so gain exceeds loss only when the local detuning and coupling strengths satisfy the derived resonance criteria; this same local mechanism produces self-organized pairwise synchronization and global phase locking near resonance.

Load-bearing premise

The resonance conditions and local spin–mechanical couplings can be kept controllable and dominant over decoherence, disorder, and residual nonlocal couplings in a real multi-site device built with current experimental tools.

What would settle it

Build or simulate a small multi-site chain, set the claimed resonance conditions at selected sites, and check whether only those sites show a clear transition from thermal motion to self-sustained coherent oscillation with the predicted pairwise or global phase locking; failure of site selectivity or of the predicted synchronization would refute the central claim.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Phonon-laser arrays can be scaled by adding modular spin–mechanical units rather than redesigning a global bus.
  • Individual mechanical oscillators can be turned into lasers on demand by switching only their local coupling, enabling spatially selective coherent sources.
  • Self-organized pairwise and global phase locking near resonance supplies a natural route to synchronized phonon sources without external phase control.
  • The same architecture can be integrated into larger quantum systems that already host Ising-like spin chains and GHz mechanical modes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If local resonance conditions remain robust under realistic disorder, the scheme could serve as a modular building block for hybrid quantum networks that need site-selective coherent mechanical drive.
  • The spontaneous synchronization near resonance suggests the array may function as a many-body phase-locked oscillator, potentially useful for sensing or clock distribution without extra feedback hardware.
  • Failure modes under strong residual nonlocal couplings would map the practical boundary between modular local driving and the older common-bus designs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript (as supplied under arXiv:2603.29099) claims to introduce scalable arrays of individually addressable phonon lasers realized by local driving of a quantum many-body Ising-like spin chain. It asserts that resonance conditions rigorously determine the transition from thermal motion to sustained coherent self-oscillation, that purely local driving (no common bus) yields a modular architecture, that site-selective lasing is possible by switching spin-mechanical couplings, and that the array is robust to mismatches while exhibiting pairwise and global self-organized synchronization. An experimental outline within current capabilities is promised. The body of the supplied document, however, is the unrelated CHI ’26 paper “VueBuds: Visual Intelligence with Wireless Earbuds” (arXiv:2603.29095), which contains no spin-chain Hamiltonian, master equation, resonance conditions, numerics, or phonon-laser analysis.

Significance. If the abstract’s claims were substantiated by a correct manuscript, the work would be significant: modular, locally driven phonon-laser arrays without a shared bus would remove a key scalability bottleneck and open many-body synchronization studies and on-demand site-selective coherent phonons for quantum technologies. Because the supplied full text is a completely different paper, none of those claims can be verified, and the significance of the actual submission cannot be assessed.

major comments (2)
  1. The document provided as the full manuscript of arXiv:2603.29099 is in fact the VueBuds CHI paper (arXiv:2603.29095). It contains no Ising-like spin chain, no spin-mechanical Hamiltonian, no resonance conditions, no master-equation derivation of the thermal-to-lasing transition, no robustness or synchronization analysis, and no experimental roadmap for phonon lasers. The central claims of the abstract therefore cannot be evaluated; the correct manuscript must be supplied before any scientific review is possible.
  2. Even the abstract’s load-bearing assertions (rigorous resonance conditions, robustness to mismatches, pairwise/global self-organized synchronization under purely local driving) remain uncheckable. Without equations, figures, or parameter regimes, it is impossible to confirm that local couplings dominate decoherence/disorder or that synchronization is not an artifact of an unstated common mode.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity can be assessed: supplied full text is the unrelated VueBuds HCI systems paper, not the phonon-laser Letter whose abstract and claims are under review.

full rationale

The abstract, paper_id (2603.29099) and claimed derivation (resonance conditions for phonon lasing from a locally driven Ising-like spin-mechanical chain, on-demand site-selective self-oscillation, self-organized synchronization without a common bus) have no counterpart in the provided full manuscript, which is instead the complete VueBuds CHI paper (camera-integrated wireless earbuds, arXiv:2603.29095). VueBuds is an empirical hardware/systems paper: custom PCB + HM01B0 cameras on Sony WF-1000XM3, BLE streaming, power profiling (IDLE 3.8 mW / ACTIVE 24.9 mW), VLM latency/accuracy benchmarks, and two user studies (N=74 online MOS, N=16 in-person VQA). It contains no master equations, resonance conditions, gain-loss thresholds, synchronization order parameters, or first-principles predictions that could reduce to their own inputs by construction. None of the six circularity patterns (self-definitional, fitted-input-as-prediction, load-bearing self-citation, uniqueness import, ansatz smuggling, renaming) appear. Per the analyzer rules, when the derivation chain is absent the correct finding is score 0 with empty steps; the manuscript mismatch itself is a data error, not circularity inside a derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review. Load-bearing background includes standard open quantum systems and optomechanics (gain vs loss for lasing threshold), Ising-like spin interactions, and local spin–mechanical coupling. No free parameters or invented particles are named in the abstract; resonance conditions and modularity are the paper’s claimed contributions, not free fits. Experimental platforms are assumed to exist within current capabilities without quantitative budgets here.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Phonon lasing occurs when effective gain exceeds intrinsic mechanical losses, producing self-sustained coherent vibration.
    Standard phonon-laser threshold condition invoked as the phenomenon to be engineered site-by-site.
  • domain assumption An Ising-like quantum spin chain with local spin–mechanical couplings and local driving can be realized and controlled.
    Architectural premise of the proposal; experimental outline asserts current-platform feasibility.
  • ad hoc to paper Purely local driving (no common coupling bus) still permits pairwise and global phase locking near resonance.
    Central dynamical claim of the Letter; treated as derived in the unseen analysis rather than standard textbook fact.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 34765 in / 2291 out tokens · 36227 ms · 2026-07-14T20:00:56.314763+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantum mechanical oscillators operating at frequencies up to the GHz regime have been predicted to support phonon lasing -- self-sustained coherent vibrational motion emerging when the effective gain exceeds intrinsic losses. Current phonon-laser proposals face two key limitations, namely: they lack scalability and rely on coupling all oscillators to a common field, which significantly restricts flexibility and prevents selective, on-demand phonon lasing at specific locations. Given that numerous applications and theoretical insights naturally emerge from scalable many-body systems, addressing these limitations is timely. In this Letter, we demonstrate how scalable arrays of individually addressable phonon lasers can be generated through local driving in a quantum many-body Ising-like spin chain. We rigorously establish the resonance conditions under which mechanical oscillators transition from thermal motion to sustained coherent self-oscillation. Unlike previous approaches that rely on a common coupling bus, our proposal employs purely local driving, resulting in an inherently modular and scalable architecture ideally suited for integration into large-scale quantum systems. Additionally, our approach enables on-demand lasing of individual mechanical oscillators at specific sites by simply switching the spin-mechanical coupling interaction on and off, provided specific resonance conditions are satisfied. Notably, our phonon laser array is robust against resonance mismatches and naturally exhibits both pairwise self-organized synchronization and global phase locking near resonance. Finally, we outline an experimental implementation within current experimental capabilities.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Squeezed Phonon Lasing via Floquet-Controlled Solid-State Defects

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Proposes Floquet driving of solid-state defects to realize stable squeezed phonon lasing with controlled quadrature squeezing.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    [n. d.]. FSC-BT631D Nordic nRF5340 BT5.3 Classic and LE Audio Module Transceiver. https://www.feasycom.com/product/fsc-bt631d/

  2. [2]

    [n. d.]. Infineon CYW20819/20820. https://www.infineon.com/part/CYW20819

  3. [3]

    [n. d.]. Qualcomm QCC5171. https://www.qualcomm.com/products/internet- of-things/consumer/audio/qcc51xx-series/qcc5171

  4. [4]

    [n. d.]. WiseEye2 AI Processor (WE2). https://www.himax.com.tw/products/ wiseeye-ai-sensing/wiseeye2-ai-processor/. �������� ������ ������������ ���� �������� ������� ��� ���� ����� ������ ����� ���������� �����

  5. [5]

    https://www.gsmarena.com/3c_certification_reveals_the_airpods_pro_ 2s_battery_capacity-news-56031.php

    2022.3C certification reveals the Apple AirPods Pro 2’s battery capac- ity. https://www.gsmarena.com/3c_certification_reveals_the_airpods_pro_ 2s_battery_capacity-news-56031.php

  6. [6]

    Enhancing Vision, the Smart Way.Review of Ophthalmology(may 2025)

    2025. Enhancing Vision, the Smart Way.Review of Ophthalmology(may 2025). https://www.reviewofophthalmology.com/article/enhancing-vision- the-smart-way Accessed: [Dec 1 2025]

  7. [7]

    Introducing AirPods Pro 3, the ultimate audio experience

    2025. Introducing AirPods Pro 3, the ultimate audio experience. https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2025/09/introducing-airpods-pro-3- the-ultimate-audio-experience/

  8. [8]

    Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jeff Donahue, Pauline Luc, Antoine Miech, Iain Barr, Yana Hasson, Karel Lenc, Arthur Mensch, Katherine Millican, Malcolm Reynolds, Roman Ring, Eliza Rutherford, Serkan Cabi, Tengda Han, Zhitao Gong, Sina Samangooei, Marianne Monteiro, Jacob L Menick, Sebastian Borgeaud, Andy Brock, Aida Nematzadeh, Sahand Sharifzadeh, Mikoł aj Bińko...

  9. [9]

    Pavan Kumar Anasosalu Vasu, Fartash Faghri, Chun-Liang Li, Cem Koc, Nate True, Albert Antony, Gokul Santhanam, James Gabriel, Peter Grasch, Oncel Tuzel, and Hadi Pouransari. 2025. FastVLM: Efficient Vision Encoding for Vision Language Models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

  10. [10]

    Apple. [n. d.]. Choose your new Mac mini. https://www.apple.com/shop/buy- mac/mac-mini/m4-pro

  11. [11]

    Apple. 2025. AirPods 4. https://www.apple.com/airpods-4/specs/

  12. [13]

    Shuai Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, Sibo Song, Kai Dang, Peng Wang, Shijie Wang, Jun Tang, Humen Zhong, Yuanzhi Zhu, Mingkun Yang, Zhaohai Li, Jianqiang Wan, Pengfei Wang, Wei Ding, Zheren Fu, Yiheng Xu, Jiabo Ye, Xi Zhang, Tianbao Xie, Zesen Cheng, Hang Zhang, Zhibo Yang, Haiyang Xu, and Junyang Lin. 2025. Qwen2.5-VL Technical Rep...

  13. [14]

    Mirza Samad Ahmed Baig, Syeda Anshrah Gillani, Shahid Munir Shah, Mah- moud Aljawarneh, Abdul Akbar Khan, and Muhammad Hamzah Siddiqui. 2024. AI-based wearable vision assistance system for the visually impaired: Inte- grating real-time object recognition and contextual understanding using large vision-language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.20059(2024)

  14. [15]

    BatteryClub. [n. d.]. Batteries for Sony WF-1000XM3, Samsung Galaxy Buds, and Buds Live. https://www.batteryclub.org/Goods/ECN12777_SCA_OTH- Z55-Zenipower-Battery.html

  15. [16]

    Abdelkareem Bedri, Richard Li, Malcolm Haynes, Raj Prateek Kosaraju, Ishaan Grover, Temiloluwa Prioleau, Min Yan Beh, Mayank Goel, Thad Starner, and Gregory Abowd. 2017. EarBit: Using Wearable Sensors to Detect Eating Episodes in Unconstrained Environments.Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol.1, 3, Article 37 (Sept. 2017), 20 pages. doi:10...

  16. [17]

    Andrea Bejarano-Carbo, Hyochan An, Kyojin Choo, Shiyu Liu, Dennis Sylvester, David Blaauw, and Hun-Seok Kim. 2022. Millimeter-Scale Ultra-Low-Power Imaging System for Intelligent Edge Monitoring. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2203.04496

  17. [18]

    Divyanshu Bhardwaj, Alexander Ponticello, Shreya Tomar, Adrian Dabrowski, and Katharina Krombholz. 2024. In Focus, Out of Privacy: The Wearer’s Per- spective on the Privacy Dilemma of Camera Glasses. InProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, N...

  18. [19]

    Laura Boccardo. 2020. Viewing distance of smartphones in presbyopic and non-presbyopic age. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8093538/

  19. [20]

    Sébastien Bubeck, Varun Chandrasekaran, Ronen Eldan, Johannes Gehrke, Eric Horvitz, Ece Kamar, Peter Lee, Yin Tat Lee, Yuanzhi Li, Scott Lund- berg, Harsha Nori, Hamid Palangi, Marco Tulio Ribeiro, and Yi Zhang. 2023. Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]

  20. [21]

    Runze Cai, Nuwan Janaka, Hyeongcheol Kim, Yang Chen, Shengdong Zhao, Yun Huang, and David Hsu. 2025. AiGet: Transforming Everyday Moments into Hidden Knowledge Discovery with AI Assistance on Smart Glasses. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Art...

  21. [22]

    Justin Chan, Nada Ali, Ali Najafi, Anna Meehan, Lisa Mancl, Emily Gallagher, Randall Bly, and Shyamnath Gollakota. 2022. An off-the-shelf otoacoustic- emission probe for hearing screening via a smartphone.Nature Biomedical Engineering6 (10 2022), 1–11. doi:10.1038/s41551-022-00947-6

  22. [23]

    Justin Chan, Sharat Raju, Rajalakshmi Nandakumar, Randall Bly, and Shyam- nath Gollakota. 2019. Detecting middle ear fluid using smartphones.Science Translational Medicine11 (05 2019), eaav1102. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aav1102

  23. [24]

    2022.AirPods Pro 2 Earbud Batteries 15% Bigger, But Charging Case Sees Little Improvement

    Hartley Charlton. 2022.AirPods Pro 2 Earbud Batteries 15% Bigger, But Charging Case Sees Little Improvement. https://www.gsmarena.com/3c_certification_ reveals_the_airpods_pro_2s_battery_capacity-news-56031.php

  24. [25]

    Ishan Chatterjee, Maruchi Kim, Vivek Jayaram, Shyamnath Gollakota, Ira Kemel- macher, Shwetak Patel, and Steven M Seitz. 2022. ClearBuds: wireless binaural earbuds for learning-based speech enhancement. InMobiSys

  25. [26]

    Tuochao Chen, Malek Itani, Sefik Eskimez, Takuya Yoshioka, and Shyamnath Gollakota. 2024. Hearable devices with sound bubbles.Nature Electronics(2024)

  26. [27]

    Tuochao Chen, Benjamin Steeper, Kinan Alsheikh, Songyun Tao, François Guim- bretière, and Cheng Zhang. 2020. C-Face: Continuously Reconstructing Facial Expressions by Deep Learning Contours of the Face with Ear-mounted Miniature Cameras. InProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(Virtual Event, USA)(UIST ’20)....

  27. [28]

    COMSOL Blog. 2016. Design Safe Wearable Technology with Heat Transfer Mod- eling. COMSOL Blog. https://www.comsol.com/blogs/design-safe-wearable- technology-with-heat-transfer-modeling Accessed: [Insert Date]. This article finds a maximum safe power dissipation of 1.75 W before skin temperature exceeds the damage threshold of 43°C

  28. [29]

    ConnectSafely. 2024. Guide to Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses. https:// connectsafely.org/rayban/

  29. [30]

    Mustafa Doga Dogan, Eric J Gonzalez, Karan Ahuja, Ruofei Du, Andrea Colaço, Johnny Lee, Mar Gonzalez-Franco, and David Kim. 2024. Augmented Object Intelligence with XR-Objects. InProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(Pittsburgh, PA, USA)(UIST ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Art...

  30. [31]

    DuckyBlender. 2024. moondream returns no response. https://github.com/ ollama/ollama/issues/4063

  31. [32]

    Brian L Due. 2015. The social construction of a Glasshole: Google Glass and multiactivity in social interaction.PsychNology Journal13, 2 (2015)

  32. [33]

    Renzo D’Amato, Fabrizio Cutolo, Giovanni Badiali, Marina Carbone, Hao Lu, Harm Hogenbirk, and Vincenzo Ferrari. 2022. Key ergonomics requirements and possible mechanical solutions for augmented reality head-mounted displays in surgery.Multimodal Technologies and Interaction6, 2 (2022), 15

  33. [34]

    Xiaoran Fan and Trausti Thormundsson. 2023. Design Earable Sensing Systems: Perspectives and Lessons Learned from Industry. InAdjunct Proceedings of the 2023 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and the 2023 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers

  34. [35]

    Feng Liu Fan Zhang. 2014. Parallax-tolerant Image Stitching. https://www.cv- foundation.org/openaccess/content_cvpr_2014/papers/Zhang_Parallax- tolerant_Image_Stitching_2014_CVPR_paper.pdf

  35. [36]

    Andrea Ferlini, Dong Ma, Robert Harle, and Cecilia Mascolo. 2021. EarGate: gait-based user identification with in-ear microphones. InProceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking(New Orleans, Louisiana)(MobiCom ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 337–349. doi:10.1145/3447993.3483240

  36. [37]

    Google. [n. d.]. Google Glasses: Never miss a moment. https://www.google. com/glass/photography/

  37. [38]

    Xianda Guo, Chenming Zhang, Youmin Zhang, Dujun Nie, Ruilin Wang, Wen- zhao Zheng, Matteo Poggi, and Long Chen. 2024. Stereo Anything: Unify- ing Stereo Matching with Large-Scale Mixed Data. arXiv:2411.14053 [cs.CV] https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.14053

  38. [39]

    Herbert Heuer and D Alfred Owens. 1989. Vertical gaze direction and the resting posture of the eyes.Perception18, 3 (1989), 363–377

  39. [40]

    Jason Hong. 2013. Considering privacy issues in the context of Google glass. Commun. ACM56, 11 (Nov. 2013), 10–11. doi:10.1145/2524713.2524717

  40. [41]

    Hein Min Htike, Tom H Margrain, Yu-Kun Lai, and Parisa Eslambolchilar. 2020. Ability of head-mounted display technology to improve mobility in people with low vision: A systematic review.Translational Vision Science & Technology9, 10 (2020), 26–26

  41. [42]

    Changshuo Hu, Qiang Yang, Yang Liu, Tobias Röddiger, Kayla-Jade Butkow, Mathias Ciliberto, Adam Luke Pullin, Jake Stuchbury-Wass, Mahbub Hassan, Cecilia Mascolo, and Dong Ma. 2025. A Survey of Earable Technology: Trends, Tools, and the Road Ahead. arXiv:2506.05720 [cs.HC] https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2506.05720

  42. [43]

    Xiyun Hu, Dizhi Ma, Fengming He, Zhengzhe Zhu, Shao-Kang Hsia, Chenfei Zhu, Ziyi Liu, and Karthik Ramani. 2025. GesPrompt: Leveraging Co-Speech Gestures to Augment LLM-Based Interaction in Virtual Reality. InProceedings of the 2025 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 59–80. doi:10...

  43. [44]

    Jeremy Zhengqi Huang, Jaylin Herskovitz, Liang-Yuan Wu, Cecily Morrison, and Dhruv Jain. 2025. Weaving Sound Information to Support Real-Time Sensemak- ing of Auditory Environments: Co-Designing with a DHH User. InProceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA,...

  44. [45]

    International Data Corporation. 2024. Worldwide Quarterly Wearable Device Tracker. https://www.idc.com/promo/wearablevendor/. Accessed: 2025-01-23

  45. [46]

    Campbell

    Muhammad Zahid Iqbal and Abraham G. Campbell. 2023. Adopting smart glasses responsibly: potential benefits, ethical, and privacy concerns with Ray- Ban stories.AI and Ethics3 (2023), 325–327. doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00155-7

  46. [47]

    Malek Itani, Tuochao Chen, Arun Raghavan, Gavriel Kohlberg, and Shyamnath Gollakota. 2025. Wireless Hearables With Programmable Speech AI Accelerators. ACM MOBICOM(2025)

  47. [49]

    Vikram Iyer, Ali Najafi, Johannes James, Sawyer Fuller, and Shyamnath Gol- lakota. 2020. Wireless steerable vision for live insects and insect-scale robots. Science robotics5, 44 (2020), eabb0839. doi:10.1126/scirobotics.abb0839

  48. [50]

    Suyao Ji, Jing Pu, Byong Chan Lim, and Mark Horowitz. 2016. A 220pJ/pixel/frame CMOS image sensor with partial settling readout architecture. (2016)

  49. [51]

    Feipeng Da Jian Yu. 2024. Parallax-Tolerant Image Stitching with Epipolar Displacement Field. https://arxiv.org/html/2311.16637v2

  50. [52]

    Lavender Jiang, Xujin Liu, Nima Nejatian, Mustafa Nasir-Moin, Duo Wang, Anas Abidin, Kevin Eaton, Howard Riina, Ilya Laufer, Paawan Punjabi, Madeline Miceli, Nora Kim, Cordelia Orillac, Zane Schnurman, Christopher Livia, Hannah Weiss, David Kurland, Sean Neifert, Yosef Dastagirzada, and Eric Oermann

  51. [53]

    Nature(2023)

    Health system-scale language models are all-purpose prediction engines. Nature(2023)

  52. [54]

    Christin Jose, Yuriy Mishchenko, Thibaud Sénéchal, Anish Shah, Alex Escott, and Shiv Vitaladevuni. 2020. Accurate detection of wakeword start and end using a CNN. (2020). https://www.amazon.science/publications/accurate- detection-of-wake-word-start-and-end-using-a-cnn

  53. [55]

    Colleen Josephson, Lei Yang, Pengyu Zhang, and Sachin Katti. 2019. Wireless Computer Vision Using Commodity Radios. InIPSN

  54. [56]

    Fahim Kawsar, Chulhong Min, Akhil Mathur, and Alessandro Montanari. 2018. Earables for Personal-Scale Behavior Analytics.IEEE Pervasive Computing17, 3 (2018), 83–89. doi:10.1109/MPRV.2018.03367740

  55. [57]

    Muiz Ahmed Khan, Pias Paul, Mahmudur Rashid, Mainul Hossain, and Md Atiqur Rahman Ahad. 2020. An AI-based visual aid with integrated reading assistant for the completely blind.IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 50, 6 (2020), 507–517

  56. [58]

    Maruchi Kim, Antonio Glenn, Bandhav Veluri, Yunseo Lee, Eyoel Gebre, Aditya Bagaria, Shwetak Patel, and Shyamnath Gollakota. 2024. IRIS: Wireless ring for vision-based smart home interaction. InUIST

  57. [59]

    Marion Koelle, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Simon Czupalla, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2018. Your smart glasses’ camera bothers me! exploring opt- in and opt-out gestures for privacy mediation. InProceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction(Oslo, Norway)(NordiCHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 473–48...

  58. [60]

    Shoichi Koyama, Enzo De Sena, Prasanga Samarasinghe, Mark R. P. Thomas, and Fabio Antonacci. 2025. Past, Present, and Future of Spatial Audio and Room Acoustics. InICASSP 2025 - 2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). 1–5. doi:10.1109/ICASSP49660.2025. 10890366

  59. [61]

    Kvng. 2025. Pipeline (computing). https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pipeline_ (computing)

  60. [62]

    Pupil Labs. [n. d.]. Pupil Invisible Glasses: Eye tracking glasses for the real-world. https://pupil-labs.com/products/invisible

  61. [63]

    Chae Young Lee, Pu, Yi, Maxwell Fite, Tejus Rao, Sara Achour, and Zerina Kapetanovic. 2025. HyperCam: Low-Power Onboard Computer Vision for IoT Cameras.ACM MobiCom(2025)

  62. [64]

    Rodriguez, and Jon E

    Jaewook Lee, Jun Wang, Elizabeth Brown, Liam Chu, Sebastian S. Rodriguez, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2024. GazePointAR: A Context-Aware Multimodal Voice Assistant for Pronoun Disambiguation in Wearable Augmented Reality. InPro- ceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA)(CHI ’24). Association for Computing Mach...

  63. [65]

    Won June Lee, Ji Hong Kim, Yong Un Shin, Sunjin Hwang, and Han Woong Lim

  64. [66]

    Differences in eye movement range based on age and gaze direction.Eye 33, 7 (2019), 1145–1151

  65. [67]

    Tianli Liao, Ce Wang, Lei Li, Guangen Liu, and Nan Li. 2024. Parallax-tolerant Image Stitching via Segmentation-guided Multi-homography Warping. https: //arxiv.org/abs/2406.19922

  66. [68]

    Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, and Yong Jae Lee. 2023. Visual Instruction Tuning. InNeurIPS

  67. [69]

    Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, and Yong Jae Lee. 2023. Visual Instruction Tuning. arXiv:2304.08485 [cs.CV] https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08485

  68. [70]

    Dong Ma, Andrea Ferlini, and Cecilia Mascolo. 2021. OESense: Employing Occlusion Effect for in-Ear Human Sensing. InMobiSys

  69. [71]

    Cognitive market Research. [n. d.]. Wireless Earbuds Market Report 2025 (Global Edition). https://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/wireless-earbuds-market- report

  70. [72]

    maxi1134. 2025. Ollama Moondream:Latest returns no answer. https://github. com/valentinfrlch/ha-llmvision/issues/201

  71. [73]

    Meta. [n. d.]. Ray-Ban Meta Glasses. https://www.meta.com/ai-glasses/

  72. [74]

    Yurina Mizuho, Yohei Kawasaki, Takashi Amesaka, and Yuta Sugiura. 2024. EarAuthCam: Personal Identification and Authentication Method Using Ear Images Acquired with a Camera-Equipped Hearable Device. InAHs. 119–130

  73. [75]

    Vimal Mollyn, Riku Arakawa, Mayank Goel, Chris Harrison, and Karan Ahuja

  74. [76]

    InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Hamburg, Germany)(CHI ’23)

    IMUPoser: Full-Body Pose Estimation using IMUs in Phones, Watches, and Earbuds. InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Hamburg, Germany)(CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 529, 12 pages. doi:10.1145/3544548. 3581392

  75. [77]

    moondream.ai. [n. d.]. Moondream

  76. [78]

    Fukashi Morishita, Norihito Kato, Satoshi Okubo, Takao Toi, Mitsuru Hiraki, Sugako Otani, Hideaki Abe, Yuji Shinohara, and Hiroyuki Kondo. 2021. A CMOS Image Sensor and an AI Accelerator for Realizing Edge-Computing- Based Surveillance Camera Systems. In2021 Symposium on VLSI Circuits. 1–2

  77. [79]

    Saman Naderiparizi, Mehrdad Hessar, Vamsi Talla, Shyamnath Gollakota, and Joshua R. Smith. 2018. Towards Battery-Free HD Video Streaming. InNSDI

  78. [80]

    NovelBits. 2023. Bluetooth 5 speed: How to achieve maximum throughput for your BLE application. https://novelbits.io/bluetooth-5-speed-maximum- throughput/

  79. [81]

    Ollama. 2024. Gemma2 models with Ollama run extremely slow. https://github. com/ollama/ollama/issues/9683 GitHub Issue #9683

  80. [82]

    Jay Prakash, Zhijian Yang, Yu-Lin Wei, Haitham Hassanieh, and Romit Roy Choudhury. 2020. EarSense: Earphones as a Teeth Activity Sensor. InMobiCom

Showing first 80 references.