Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 83 references

Fe and Co intercalation, not doping, kills the TaS2 plasmon

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Intercalating Fe or Co into 2H-TaS2 suppresses its low-energy plasmon by introducing damping channels, as shown by core-level photoemission fits and RPA loss-function calculations.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-04 challenge →

load-bearing objection Solid RPA-ELF and plausible XPS evidence that intercalation, not doping, suppresses the 2H-TaS2 plasmon; worth reviewing despite the indirect identification of the XPS loss feature. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2603.29402 v1 pith:6AWVEU7J submitted 2026-03-31 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Plasmon Engineering in Intercalated 2H-TaS$_2$

Luigi Camerano , Laura Martella , Lorenzo Battaglia , Federico Giannessi , Filippo Camilli , Luca Lozzi , Polina M. Sheverdyaeva , Paolo Moras
show 3 more authors
Luca Ottaviano Gianni Profeta Federico Bisti
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el
keywords intercalation2H-TaS2plasmon suppressioncore-level photoemissionenergy-loss functionorbital hybridizationvan der Waals materialsDoniach–Šunjić lineshape
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that inserting Fe or Co atoms between the layers of 2H-TaS2 destroys its ~1 eV plasmon, and that the destruction mechanism is not the extra electrons the atoms donate (conventional doping would actually strengthen the mode) but rather the way intercalation hybridizes orbitals and reconstructs the lattice, creating a dense set of low-energy excitations that the plasmon can decay into. The authors support this with two ingredients: core-level photoemission, where a ~1 eV loss satellite in pristine TaS2 is suppressed in Fe1/3TaS2 and Co1/3TaS2, and first-principles random-phase-approximation calculations of the energy-loss function, which show a well-defined collective mode in the pristine material turning into an overdamped response after intercalation. If correct, this gives materials scientists a new chemical dial—intercalation—for engineering dynamical screening and plasmon coherence in van der Waals metals, independent of carrier density.

Core claim

The central discovery is that intercalation suppresses the plasmon in 2H-TaS2 through a mechanism that is distinct from conventional electron doping: the intercalant atoms do not simply shift the Fermi level but hybridize with Ta-derived states and induce a √3×√3R30° reconstruction, opening a continuum of low-energy particle-hole excitations that act as decay channels, while simultaneously reducing the in-plane bare plasma frequency. In the pristine compound the calculated energy-loss function shows a sharp plasmon with the characteristic negative momentum dispersion; in both intercalated compounds the mode becomes strongly damped and progressively loses its coherence, with cobalt producing

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a quantitative core-level lineshape model and a first-principles energy-loss calculation. The lineshape is a time-domain generalization of the Doniach–Šunjić asymmetric line: I(E) ~ ∫ e^{i(E−E0)t−λ|t|−σ²t²/2−g(it)} dt with g(τ)=α∫₀^∞ ρ(E)(1−e^{Eτ})/E² dE, where ρ(ω) encodes the joint density of states near the Fermi level; this lets the authors separate intrinsic many-body asymmetry from an extrinsic ~1 eV loss satellite. The loss satellite is assigned to the bulk plasmon, whose fate is then computed directly via the RPA energy-loss function −Im(1/ε) along Γ–M in GPAW. The two probes agree: the calculated plasmon turns overdamped upon Fe/Co intercalation, matching

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on the assumption that the ~1 eV residual in the Ta-4f core-level fits, after removing the joint-density-of-states lineshape, is really an extrinsic bulk plasmon loss and not an artifact of the chosen lineshape model or an unmodeled intrinsic satellite.

What would settle it

Measure the electron-energy-loss function of Fe1/3TaS2 and Co1/3TaS2 single crystals, or compute the extrinsic loss structure from the calculated dielectric function and compare its energy and intensity to the residual feature in the core-level spectra; if the intercalated compounds still show a ~1 eV plasmon peak in EELS (or the calculated loss feature does not match the residual), the suppression claim would be in doubt.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If intercalation suppresses plasmons by opening decay channels, then the lifetime and coherence of collective modes in van der Waals metals can be engineered by chemical selection of intercalant species and concentration, without changing carrier density.
  • The contrast to electron doping means that transport and optical measures of carrier density are not sufficient to predict plasmonic response; the orbital- and structure-determined low-energy spectrum is the controlling factor.
  • The same mechanism should apply to other layered metals with isolated metallic bands, not just 2H-TaS2, making intercalation a general design principle for dynamical screening in TMDs and related materials.
  • The generalized Doniach–Šunjić lineshape with a DFT joint density of states provides a practical recipe for extracting loss features from core-level data, potentially useful for other intercalated dichalcogenides.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's logic implies that any perturbation that hybridizes the isolated metallic band with other states—such as pressure, strain, or proximity to a metal—should similarly damp the plasmon; this is a testable prediction beyond intercalation.
  • A direct quantitative test would compare the energy and intensity of the ~1 eV core-level residual to the computed ELF at the same momentum; the paper currently relies on the photon-energy trend and prior EELS rather than that direct comparison, so measuring EELS on the intercalated compounds would close the gap.
  • The stronger damping in Co than Fe suggests tuning the intercalant content (x in M_xTaS2) could continuously vary plasmon coherence, with applications to switchable plasmonic devices if the intercalation can be made reversible, for example electrochemically.
  • Because the mechanism is a dense continuum of low-energy excitations, the suppression should also appear as a broad, featureless optical conductivity rather than a distinct plasmon loss peak; this is checkable by infrared/optical spectroscopy on the same crystals.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper argues that Fe and Co intercalation in 2H-TaS2 suppresses the low-energy (~1 eV) plasmon mode not through conventional electron doping but through orbital hybridization and structural reconstruction that open additional particle–hole decay channels. The evidence is two-pronged. (1) Core-level photoemission: Ta-4f spectra are fitted with a generalized Doniach–Šunjić lineshape [Eq. (1)] that incorporates a DFT-derived joint density of states; the residual between fit and data shows a ~1 eV feature attributed to an extrinsic bulk-plasmon loss that is suppressed in Fe1/3TaS2 and Co1/3TaS2. (2) First-principles RPA calculations of the energy-loss function (Fig. 3) show that the sharp negative-dispersion plasmon of pristine 2H-TaS2 becomes strongly damped/overdamped in the intercalated compounds, while simple electron doping preserves a coherent mode. The calculations also reproduce the known negative plasmon dispersion of 2H-TaS2, providing an independent pillar for the central claim.

Significance. If the result holds, it establishes intercalation as a distinct, chemically tunable design axis for dynamical screening in van der Waals metals: instead of shifting carrier density, it transforms a coherent collective mode into an overdamped response. The computational part is a genuine strength: the RPA ELF workflow is reproducible (GPAW/VASP with stated parameters), reproduces the known negative dispersion in pristine TaS2, and gives a falsifiable prediction—the overdamped ELF in Fe/Co intercalates—that could be checked by momentum-resolved EELS. The use of a DFT-derived joint DoS in the core-level lineshape model is also a constructive step beyond the standard DS form. However, the experimental demonstration currently rests on an indirect, non-quantitative identification of the ~1 eV XPS residual as an extrinsic bulk plasmon; the paper's central claim would be considerably strengthened by a direct comparison of that residual with the calculated ELF.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 2d–f and 'quantitative analysis of the residual χ' (main text after Table I)] The ~1 eV residual in the Ta-4f fits is assigned to an extrinsic bulk-plasmon loss, but it is never quantitatively compared with the ELF calculated in Fig. 3. The identification rests on the photon-energy trend and on prior EELS [15]; a real extrinsic loss should appear as a convolution of the no-loss spectrum with an energy-dependent loss probability derived from Im[-1/ε]. Absent such a model, the residual could be an artifact of the chosen lineshape or an unmodeled intrinsic satellite. Because the paper's experimental demonstration of 'plasmon suppression' is the suppression of this residual, this is a load-bearing point. Please include a quantitative comparison (e.g., an ELF-based loss convolution) or explicitly re-frame the XPS evidence as consistent with, but not independently establishing, the RPA prediction.
  2. [Table I and the Gadzuk–Šunjić discussion (paragraph after Table I)] The fitted asymmetry parameter α for 2H-TaS2 increases by a factor of ~4.4 between 300 eV and Al Kα (0.17 → 0.75). This is attributed to the sudden-approximation trend of Gadzuk–Šunjić [61], but no quantitative model for the energy dependence is given, and the factor seems too large for that mechanism. The concern is that α is absorbing the unmodeled loss weight: as the photon energy increases and the loss peak grows, the no-loss DS tail is stretched to compensate. Please test this explicitly—for example, by fixing α to a theoretically motivated hν dependence and refitting, or by including the loss feature in the model and reporting α separately.
  3. [SI §V, SKND fits (Figs. S3–S5)] The supplementary material introduces a skew-normal distribution (SKND) whose stated role is to describe 'both the extrinsic plasmon and asymmetry of the peak due to electronic JDoS effects.' This is a phenomenological function with an extra asymmetry parameter, and it can absorb the very feature that the main text interprets as a plasmon-loss residual. The main text does not cross-reference this alternative decomposition, leaving two incompatible lineshape models. Please report, for the SKND model, the fitted intensity of the loss-related component in 2H-TaS2 versus the intercalates, so that the suppression claim is robust to the choice of background/lineshape model.
minor comments (5)
  1. [References [3], [67], SI Ref. [11]] Several reference strings are corrupted: 'Micha/suppress l Papaj' (Ref. [3]) and 'Du/suppress lak' (Ref. [67] and SI Ref. [11]) appear to be LaTeX artifacts. Unpublished items (e.g., Refs. [24], [49], [52]) should be marked as such (e.g., 'unpublished' or 'in preparation').
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption states 'The energy scale of this plot is fixed by the values in Fig. 2,' which is confusing; the residuals should have a common, clearly labeled scale (ideally in the same figure) so that the suppression across compounds and photon energies can be judged by eye.
  3. [Main text, paragraph after Table I] The sentence referring to residuals in 'Fig. 2b–c–d' appears to mismatch the actual panel labels: for 2H-TaS2 the residuals are shown below panels (d)–(f), and for the intercalates below panels (g)–(i) and (l)–(n). Please correct the citations.
  4. [SI §II.A (GPAW ELF details)] The ELF calculation uses a broadening of η = 25×10^-3 eV and a frequency range 0.01–5 eV. Since Fig. 3 shows broad features at energies of order 1 eV, the dependence of the loss-function line shape on η and on the k-point sampling should be checked and briefly reported to rule out numerical broadening as the source of the overdamped response.
  5. [SI §IV and §V] The bulk–surface core-level shift is interpreted via initial-state DFT only; final-state screening effects are not discussed. A sentence acknowledging this limitation, or a quick final-state estimate, would improve the robustness of the S-2p decomposition.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the XPS residual is an observed fitting residual, not an input to the model, and the RPA ELF is an independent first-principles calculation; minor self-citations are corroborated and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central claim—that Fe/Co intercalation suppresses the 2H-TaS2 plasmon through orbital hybridization and enhanced low-energy decay channels rather than simple electron doping—is supported by two largely independent lines of evidence. The core-level lineshape model in Eq. (1) uses the DFT joint density of states as a fixed shape input, with alpha as a free parameter fitted to the XPS data; the ~1 eV residual is then the difference between the measured spectrum and this fitted model. The residual is therefore an observed lack-of-fit, not a quantity constructed from the model. The RPA energy-loss function in Fig. 3 is computed separately with GPAW from the DFT ground-state electronic structure, with stated smearing, spin configurations, and U values, and it is not fitted to the XPS residual. The comparison with an electron-doped 2H-TaS2 calculation (Fig. 3g–h) provides an additional control for the doping hypothesis. The paper does cite the authors' own prior ARPES work (Refs. [24,34]) for the intercalant-induced bands and n-doping, but these statements are corroborated by external ARPES references ([50–52]) and by the paper's own DFT calculations, so the self-citations are not load-bearing. The skeptic concern that the residual could be absorbed by the free alpha or by the chosen lineshape is a legitimate model-dependence and correctness risk, but it is not circular: there is no equation or fitting step in which the residual is used to define the model output, nor is the ELF derived from the XPS fit. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited under the required standard.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or mediators. It does introduce a modeling framework for the core-level lineshape with several free parameters, and inherits the usual DFT/RPA assumptions about exchange-correlation, U, and spin ordering. The extrapolation from residual subtraction to plasmon damping depends on these choices.

free parameters (3)
  • α (asymmetry/many-body coupling strength) = 2H-TaS2: 0.17/0.41/0.75; Fe1/3TaS2: 0.04/0.03/0.12; Co1/3TaS2: 0.10/0.13/0.21 (300 eV/700 eV/Al-Kα)
    Fitted per spectrum to reproduce core-level asymmetry; the paper uses the trend across compounds as evidence for DoS changes, so the claim partially depends on it.
  • E0, Lorentzian/Gaussian widths λ and σ of core-level fit = not tabulated in main text or SI excerpt
    Free fitting parameters that define the residuals; the 1 eV residual feature depends on how these are chosen, especially the SKND background.
  • Hubbard U on Fe d states = 1.5 eV
    Chosen for Fe; affects the calculated DoS and hence the lineshape input. Not fitted here but selected from standard practice.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The generalized Doniach-Šunjić model with JDoS(ω)/[JDoS'(0)] (Eq. 1) captures the intrinsic core-level asymmetry and can be separated from extrinsic loss as a background.
    The attribution of the remaining residual beyond Eq. (1) to the extrinsic plasmon rests on this model being a complete description of intrinsic effects.
  • domain assumption The ~1 eV spectral feature is an extrinsic bulk plasmon loss, scaling with the inelastic mean free path trend and not contamination or an intrinsic satellite.
    The paper argues against contamination (SI Section V-A) but does not calculate the extrinsic loss intensity; it relies on prior EELS to identify the 1 eV feature.
  • domain assumption RPA in GPAW with PBE (plus U=1.5 for Fe), specific smearing and spin configurations gives a reliable ELF for the low-energy collective response.
    The damping picture and the negative dispersion are taken from RPA calculations. RPA neglects vertex corrections, excitonic/electron-phonon effects, and the CDW state of 2H-TaS2.
  • domain assumption The DFT ground state represents the CDW-ordered 2H-TaS2 and the experimentally ordered √3×√3 intercalated phases.
    2H-TaS2 has a CDW at the temperatures used in the experiments; the calculations use the pristine undistorted structure and do not model the CDW.

reviewed 2026-08-04 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Plasmon Engineering in Intercalated 2H-TaS$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6AWVEU7J

@misc{pith2026260329402,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Plasmon Engineering in Intercalated 2H-TaS$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6AWVEU7J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.29402}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Plasmons in low dimensional materials provide a powerful platform for nanoscale control of light matter interactions, yet strategies to tailor their coherence and dissipation remain limited. Here, we demonstrate that transition metal intercalation offers a fundamentally distinct route to engineer plasmonic response in layered materials. By combining high-resolution core-level photoemission spectroscopy with first-principles calculations, we show that Fe and Co intercalation in 2H-TaS2 does not act as conventional electron doping, but instead reshapes the low energy electronic structure through orbital hybridization and structural reconstruction. This process introduces a dense continuum of low energy excitations that efficiently damp and ultimately suppress the plasmon mode. First principle calculations of the energy loss function reveal a transition from a well defined collective excitation to an overdamped response, signaling the breakdown of coherent charge dynamics. Our results establish intercalation as a chemically controlled pathway to tune plasmon losses and dielectric response in quantum van der Waals materials, providing a new design principle for plasmonic and optoelectronic functionalities at the nanoscale.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.29402 by Federico Bisti, Federico Giannessi, Filippo Camilli, Gianni Profeta, Laura Martella, Lorenzo Battaglia, Luca Lozzi, Luca Ottaviano, Luigi Camerano, Paolo Moras, Polina M. Sheverdyaeva.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. a) Crystal structure of ferromagnetic Fe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. a) We report the Density of State (DoS) and b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. a)-b)-c)-d) Energy-loss function heat map as a function of energy and momentum for 2H-TaS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Collective excitations in 2d ma- terials,

    Aleksandr Rodin, Maxim Trushin, Alexandra Carvalho, and A. H. Castro Neto, “Collective excitations in 2d ma- terials,” Nature Reviews Physics2, 524–537 (2020)

    2020

  2. [2]

    Fundamen- tal limits to graphene plasmonics,

    G. X. Ni, A. S. McLeod, Z. Sun, L. Wang, L. Xiong, K. W. Post, S. S. Sunku, B.-Y. Jiang, J. Hone, C. R. Dean, M. M. Fogler, and D. N. Basov, “Fundamen- tal limits to graphene plasmonics,” Nature557, 530–533 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    Probing corre- lated states with plasmons,

    Micha/suppress l Papaj and Cyprian Lewandowski, “Probing corre- lated states with plasmons,” Science Advances9(2023), 10.1126/sciadv.adg3262

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adg3262 2023

  4. [4]

    Electronic excitations at the plas- mon–molecule interface,

    Andrei Stefancu, Naomi J. Halas, Peter Nordlander, and Emiliano Cortes, “Electronic excitations at the plas- mon–molecule interface,” Nature Physics20, 1065–1077 (2024)

    2024

  5. [5]

    Breaking surface- plasmon excitation constraint via surface spin waves,

    H. Y. Yuan and Yaroslav M. Blanter, “Breaking surface- plasmon excitation constraint via surface spin waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 156703 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    The case for plasmonics,

    Mark L. Brongersma and Vladimir M. Shalaev, “The case for plasmonics,” Science328, 440–441 (2010)

    2010

  7. [7]

    Plasmonics for improved photovoltaic devices,

    Harry A. Atwater and Albert Polman, “Plasmonics for improved photovoltaic devices,” Nature Materials9, 205–213 (2010)

    2010

  8. [8]

    Photodetection with active opti- cal antennas,

    Mark W. Knight, Heidar Sobhani, Peter Nordlander, and Naomi J. Halas, “Photodetection with active opti- cal antennas,” Science332, 702–704 (2011)

    2011

  9. [9]

    Biosensing with plasmonic nanosensors,

    Jeffrey N. Anker, W. Paige Hall, Olga Lyandres, Nilam C. Shah, Jing Zhao, and Richard P. Van Duyne, “Biosensing with plasmonic nanosensors,” Nature Mate- rials7, 442–453 (2008)

    2008

  10. [10]

    Quantum plasmonics,

    M. S. Tame, K. R. McEnery, S ¸. K.¨Ozdemir, J. Lee, S. A. Maier, and M. S. Kim, “Quantum plasmonics,” Nature Physics9, 329–340 (2013)

    2013

  11. [11]

    Graphene plasmonics,

    A. N. Grigorenko, M. Polini, and K. S. Novoselov, “Graphene plasmonics,” Nature Photonics6, 749–758 (2012)

    2012

  12. [12]

    Plasmonics of 2d nanoma- terials: Properties and applications,

    Yu Li, Ziwei Li, Cheng Chi, Hangyong Shan, Liheng Zheng, and Zheyu Fang, “Plasmonics of 2d nanoma- terials: Properties and applications,” Advanced Science 4(2017), 10.1002/advs.201600430

    work page doi:10.1002/advs.201600430 2017

  13. [13]

    Tunable optical properties of 2d materials and their applications,

    Qijie Ma, Guanghui Ren, Kai Xu, and Jian Zhen Ou, “Tunable optical properties of 2d materials and their applications,” Advanced Optical Materials9(2020), 10.1002/adom.202001313

    work page doi:10.1002/adom.202001313 2020

  14. [14]

    Polaritons in van der waals materials,

    D. N. Basov, M. M. Fogler, and F. J. Garc´ ıa de Abajo, “Polaritons in van der waals materials,” Science354 (2016), 10.1126/science.aag1992

    doi:10.1126/science.aag1992 2016

  15. [15]

    Effect of charge order on the plasmon dispersion in transition-metal dichalcogenides,

    Jasper van Wezel, Roman Schuster, Andreas K¨ onig, Mar- tin Knupfer, Jeroen van den Brink, Helmuth Berger, and Bernd B¨ uchner, “Effect of charge order on the plasmon dispersion in transition-metal dichalcogenides,” Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 176404 (2011)

    2011

  16. [16]

    Plasmons in the van der waals charge-density-wave material 2h-tase2,

    Chaoyu Song, Xiang Yuan, Ce Huang, Shenyang Huang, Qiaoxia Xing, Chong Wang, Cheng Zhang, Yuangang Xie, Yuchen Lei, Fanjie Wang, Lei Mu, Jiasheng Zhang, Faxian Xiu, and Hugen Yan, “Plasmons in the van der waals charge-density-wave material 2h-tase2,” Nature Communications12(2021), 10.1038/s41467-020-20720- 0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20720- 2021

  17. [17]

    Slow and highly confined plasmons observed in atomically thin tas2,

    Hue T. B. Do, Meng Zhao, Pengfei Li, Yu Wei Soh, Ja- gadesh Rangaraj, Bingyan Liu, Tianyu Jiang, Xinyue Zhang, Jiong Lu, Peng Song, Jinghua Teng, and Michel Bosman, “Slow and highly confined plasmons observed in atomically thin tas2,” Nature Communications16 (2025), 10.1038/s41467-025-60814-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-60814-1 2025

  18. [18]

    Plasmon dispersion in layered transition-metal dichalco- genides,

    Pierluigi Cudazzo, Matteo Gatti, and Angel Rubio, “Plasmon dispersion in layered transition-metal dichalco- genides,” Physical Review B86(2012), 10.1103/phys- revb.86.075121

    doi:10.1103/phys- 2012

  19. [19]

    Electrostatic gating and intercalation in 2d materials,

    Yecun Wu, Danfeng Li, Chun-Lan Wu, Harold Y. Hwang, and Yi Cui, “Electrostatic gating and intercalation in 2d materials,” Nature Reviews Materials8, 41–53 (2022)

    2022

  20. [20]

    Substitutional doping in 2d transition metal dichalcogenides,

    Leyi Loh, Zhepeng Zhang, Michel Bosman, and Goki Eda, “Substitutional doping in 2d transition metal dichalcogenides,” Nano Research14, 1668–1681 (2020)

    2020

  21. [21]

    Electronic properties of in- tercalation complexes of the transition metal dichalco- genides,

    R.H. Friend and A.D. Yoffe, “Electronic properties of in- tercalation complexes of the transition metal dichalco- genides,” Advances in Physics36, 1–94 (1987)

    1987

  22. [22]

    Tailoring Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction in a transition metal dichalcogenide by dual-intercalation,

    Guolin Zheng, Maoyuan Wang, Xiangde Zhu, Cheng Tan, Jie Wang, Sultan Albarakati, Nuriyah Aloufi, Meri Algarni, Lawrence Farrar, Min Wu, Yugui Yao, Min- gliang Tian, Jianhui Zhou, and Lan Wang, “Tailoring Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction in a transition metal dichalcogenide by dual-intercalation,” Nature Communi- cations12(2021), 10.1038/s41467-021-23658-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23658-z 2021

  23. [23]

    RKKY ferromagnetism with Ising-like spin states in intercalated Fe 1/4TaS2,

    K.-T. Ko, Kyoo Kim, Sung Baek Kim, H.-D. Kim, J.- Y. Kim, B. I. Min, J.-H. Park, F.-H. Chang, H.-J. Lin, A. Tanaka, and S-W. Cheong, “RKKY ferromagnetism with Ising-like spin states in intercalated Fe 1/4TaS2,” Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 247201 (2011)

    2011

  24. [24]

    Emergent 3d fermiology and magnetism in an intercalated van der waals system,

    Luigi Camerano, Emanuel A. Mart´ ınez, Victor Por´ ee, Laura Martella, Dario Mastrippolito, Debora Pierucci, Franco D’Orazio, Polina M. Sheverdyaeva, Paolo Moras, Enrico Della Valle, Tianlun Yu, Moritz Hoesch, Craig M. Polley, Thiagarajan Balasubramanian, Alessandro Nico- laou, Luca Ottaviano, Vladimir N. Strocov, Gianni Pro- feta, and Federico Bisti, “Em...

    2026

  25. [25]

    Current-driven col- lective control of helical spin texture in van der Waals antiferromagnet,

    Kai-Xuan Zhang, Suik Cheon, Hyuncheol Kim, Pyeong- jae Park, Yeochan An, Suhan Son, Jingyuan Cui, Jihoon Keum, Joonyoung Choi, Younjung Jo, Hwiin Ju, Jong- Seok Lee, Youjin Lee, Maxim Avdeev, Armin Kleibert, Hyun-Woo Lee, and Je-Geun Park, “Current-driven col- lective control of helical spin texture in van der Waals antiferromagnet,” Phys. Rev. Lett.134, ...

    2025

  26. [26]

    Chiral magnetic soliton lattice on a chiral helimagnet,

    Y. Togawa, T. Koyama, K. Takayanagi, S. Mori, Y. Kousaka, J. Akimitsu, S. Nishihara, K. Inoue, A. S. Ovchinnikov, and J. Kishine, “Chiral magnetic soliton lattice on a chiral helimagnet,” Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 107202 (2012)

    2012

  27. [27]

    Giant tunability of superlattice excitations in chiral Cr 1/3TaS2,

    J. L. Musfeldt, Y. Gu, J. T. Haraldsen, K. Du, P. Yapa, J. Yang, D. G. Mandrus, S. W. Cheong, and Z. Liu, “Giant tunability of superlattice excitations in chiral Cr 1/3TaS2,” npj Quantum Materials10(2025), 10.1038/s41535-025-00734-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-025-00734-x 2025

  28. [28]

    Electronic structure of the chiral helimagnet and 3d- intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide Cr1/3Nbs2,

    N. Sirica, S.-K. Mo, F. Bondino, I. Pis, S. Nappini, P. Vilmercati, J. Yi, Z. Gai, P. C. Snijders, P. K. Das, I. Vobornik, N. Ghimire, M. R. Koehler, L. Li, D. Sap- kota, D. S. Parker, D. G. Mandrus, and N. Mannella, “Electronic structure of the chiral helimagnet and 3d- intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide Cr1/3Nbs2,” 7 Phys. Rev. B94, 075141 (2016)

    2016

  29. [29]

    Electrical control of topological 3Q state in intercalated van der Waals antiferromagnet Cox-TaS2,

    Junghyun Kim, Kai-Xuan Zhang, Pyeongjae Park, Woonghee Cho, Hyuncheol Kim, Han-Jin Noh, and Je- Geun Park, “Electrical control of topological 3Q state in intercalated van der Waals antiferromagnet Cox-TaS2,” (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Tunable chiral and nematic states in the triple-Q anti- ferromagnet Co1/3TaS2,

    Erik Kirstein, Pyeongjae Park, Woonghee Cho, Cris- tian D. Batista, Je-Geun Park, and Scott A. Crooker, “Tunable chiral and nematic states in the triple-Q anti- ferromagnet Co1/3TaS2,” (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    Orbital selectivity causing anisotropy and particle-hole asymmetry in the charge density wave gap of 2H-TaS 2,

    J. Zhao, K. Wijayaratne, A. Butler, J. Yang, C. D. Malli- akas, D. Y. Chung, D. Louca, M. G. Kanatzidis, J. van Wezel, and U. Chatterjee, “Orbital selectivity causing anisotropy and particle-hole asymmetry in the charge density wave gap of 2H-TaS 2,” Phys. Rev. B96, 125103 (2017)

    2017

  32. [32]

    Spectroscopic signature of moment- dependent electron–phonon coupling in 2H-TaS 2,

    Kapila Wijayaratne, Junjing Zhao, Christos Malliakas, Duck Young Chung, Mercouri G. Kanatzidis, and Ut- pal Chatterjee, “Spectroscopic signature of moment- dependent electron–phonon coupling in 2H-TaS 2,” Jour- nal of Materials Chemistry C5, 11310–11316 (2017)

    2017

  33. [33]

    Short-range charge density wave order in 2H-TaS 2,

    Jaydeep Joshi, Heather M. Hill, Sugata Chowdhury, Christos D. Malliakas, Francesca Tavazza, Utpal Chat- terjee, Angela R. Hight Walker, and Patrick M. Vora, “Short-range charge density wave order in 2H-TaS 2,” Phys. Rev. B99, 245144 (2019)

    2019

  34. [34]

    Darkness in interlayer and charge density wave states of 2H-TaS 2,

    Luigi Camerano, Dario Mastrippolito, Debora Pierucci, Ji Dai, Massimo Tallarida, Luca Ottaviano, Gianni Pro- feta, and Federico Bisti, “Darkness in interlayer and charge density wave states of 2H-TaS 2,” Phys. Rev. B 111, L121112 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    Band structure engineered layered metals for low-loss plasmonics,

    Morten N. Gjerding, Mohnish Pandey, and Kristian S. Thygesen, “Band structure engineered layered metals for low-loss plasmonics,” Nature Communications8(2017), 10.1038/ncomms15133

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms15133 2017

  36. [36]

    In- terplay between structure and electronic properties of layered transition-metal dichalcogenides: Comparing the loss function of 1tand 2hpolymorphs,

    Pierluigi Cudazzo, Matteo Gatti, and Angel Rubio, “In- terplay between structure and electronic properties of layered transition-metal dichalcogenides: Comparing the loss function of 1tand 2hpolymorphs,” Phys. Rev. B90, 205128 (2014)

    2014

  37. [37]

    Negative plasmon dispersion in 2h-nbs2beyond the charge-density-wave interpretation,

    Pierluigi Cudazzo, Eric M¨ uller, Carsten Habenicht, Mat- teo Gatti, Helmuth Berger, Martin Knupfer, Angel Ru- bio, and Simo Huotari, “Negative plasmon dispersion in 2h-nbs2beyond the charge-density-wave interpretation,” New Journal of Physics18, 103050 (2016)

    2016

  38. [39]

    Core-level lineshapes in photoemission from transition-metal intercalates of tas2,

    J A Scarfe and H P Hughes, “Core-level lineshapes in photoemission from transition-metal intercalates of tas2,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter1, 6865–6875 (1989)

    1989

  39. [40]

    Photoelectron spectra of 2h-tas2and snxtas2,

    R Eppinga, G A Sawatzky, C Haas, and C F van Bruggen, “Photoelectron spectra of 2h-tas2and snxtas2,” Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics9, 3371–3380 (1976)

    1976

  40. [41]

    3d transition-metal in- tercalates of the niobium and tantalum dichalcogenides. I. magnetic properties,

    S. S. P. Parkin and R. H. Friend, “3d transition-metal in- tercalates of the niobium and tantalum dichalcogenides. I. magnetic properties,” Philosophical Magazine B41, 65–93 (1980)

    1980

  41. [42]

    3d transition-metal in- tercalates of the niobium and tantalum dichalcogenides. II. transport properties,

    S. S. P. Parkin and R. H. Friend, “3d transition-metal in- tercalates of the niobium and tantalum dichalcogenides. II. transport properties,” Philosophical Magazine B41, 95–112 (1980)

    1980

  42. [43]

    Color theorems, chiral domain topology, and magnetic properties of Fe xTaS2,

    Yoichi Horibe, Junjie Yang, Yong-Heum Cho, Xuan Luo, Sung Baek Kim, Yoon Seok Oh, Fei-Ting Huang, Toshihiro Asada, Makoto Tanimura, Dalyoung Jeong, and Sang-Wook Cheong, “Color theorems, chiral domain topology, and magnetic properties of Fe xTaS2,” Jour- nal of the American Chemical Society136, 8368–8373 (2014)

    2014

  43. [44]

    Air-stable 2D intrin- sic ferromagnetic Ta 3FeS6 with four months durability,

    Jianwei Su, Mingshan Wang, Guiheng Liu, Huiqiao Li, Junbo Han, and Tianyou Zhai, “Air-stable 2D intrin- sic ferromagnetic Ta 3FeS6 with four months durability,” Advanced Science7(2020), 10.1002/advs.202001722

    work page doi:10.1002/advs.202001722 2020

  44. [45]

    Tetrahedral triple-Q magnetic ordering and large spon- taneous Hall conductivity in the metallic triangular an- tiferromagnet Co 1/3TaS2,

    Pyeongjae Park, Woonghee Cho, Chaebin Kim, Yeochan An, Yoon-Gu Kang, Maxim Avdeev, Romain Sibille, Kazuki Iida, Ryoichi Kajimoto, Ki Hoon Lee, Woori Ju, En-Jin Cho, Han-Jin Noh, Myung Joon Han, Shang- Shun Zhang, Cristian D. Batista, and Je-Geun Park, “Tetrahedral triple-Q magnetic ordering and large spon- taneous Hall conductivity in the metallic triangu...

    doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43853-4 2023

  45. [46]

    Sponta- neous topological Hall effect induced by non-coplanar an- tiferromagnetic order in intercalated van der Waals ma- terials,

    H. Takagi, R. Takagi, S. Minami, T. Nomoto, K. Ohishi, M.-T. Suzuki, Y. Yanagi, M. Hirayama, N. D. Khanh, K. Karube, H. Saito, D. Hashizume, R. Kiyanagi, Y. Tokura, R. Arita, T. Nakajima, and S. Seki, “Sponta- neous topological Hall effect induced by non-coplanar an- tiferromagnetic order in intercalated van der Waals ma- terials,” Nature Physics19, 961–9...

    2023

  46. [47]

    Composition dependence of bulk proper- ties in the co-intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide co1/3Tas2,

    Pyeongjae Park, Woonghee Cho, Chaebin Kim, Yeochan An, Maxim Avdeev, Kazuki Iida, Ryoichi Kajimoto, and Je-Geun Park, “Composition dependence of bulk proper- ties in the co-intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide co1/3Tas2,” Phys. Rev. B109, L060403 (2024)

    2024

  47. [48]

    Structure of 2H-TaS 2,

    A. Meetsma, G. A. Wiegers, R. J. Haange, and J. L. de Boer, “Structure of 2H-TaS 2,” Acta Crystallograph- ica Section C Crystal Structure Communications46, 1598–1599 (1990)

    1990

  48. [49]

    An altermagnetic materials library in interca- lated transition-metal dichalcogenides,

    Ezra Day-Roberts, Huan Wu, Onur Erten, and A. S Botana, “An altermagnetic materials library in interca- lated transition-metal dichalcogenides,” (2026)

    2026

  49. [50]

    Spin-valley locking in 2h-tas2 and its co-intercalated counterpart: Roles of surface do- mains and co intercalation,

    Hai-Lan Luo, Josue Rodriguez, Maximilian Huber, Haoyue Jiang, Luca Moreschini, Pranav Thekke Ma- dathil, Catherine Xu, Chris Jozwiak, Aaron Bostwick, Alexei Fedorov, James G. Analytis, Dung-Hai Lee, and Alessandra Lanzara, “Spin-valley locking in 2h-tas2 and its co-intercalated counterpart: Roles of surface do- mains and co intercalation,” Nano Letters26,...

    2026

  50. [51]

    Magnetoelastic coupling in in- tercalated transition metal dichalcogenides,

    A. Kar, R. Basak, Xue Li, A. Korshunov, D. Subires, J. Phillips, C. Y. Lim, Feng Zhou, Linxuan Song, Wen- hong Wang, Yong-Chang Lau, G. Garbarino, P. Gar- giani, Y. Zhao, C. Plueckthun, S. Francoual, A. Jana, I. Vobornik, T. Valla, A. Rajapitamahuni, James G. Analytis, Robert J. Birgeneau, E. Vescovo, A. Bosak, J. Dai, M. Tallarida, A. Frano, V. Pardo, S....

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.14444 2025

  51. [52]

    Origin of a shallow electron pocket: -band in co 1/3tas2 studied 8 by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy,

    Wojciech Sas, Yuki Utsumi Boucher, Seyed Ashkan Moghadam Ziabari, Gaurav Pransu, Tr- pimir Ivˇ si´ c, Ivana Vobornik, Jun Fujii, Naveen Singh Dhami, Bruno Gudac, Mario Novak, L´ aszl´ o Forr´ o, Neven Bariˇ si´ c, Ivo Batisti´ c, and Petar Popˇ cevi´ c, “Origin of a shallow electron pocket: -band in co 1/3tas2 studied 8 by angle-resolved photoemission spe...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.15588 2026

  52. [53]

    Charge transfer effects in x-ray core level photoemission from layered transition metal intercalates,

    J J Barry and H P Hughes, “Charge transfer effects in x-ray core level photoemission from layered transition metal intercalates,” Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics15, L797–L800 (1982)

    1982

  53. [54]

    Intrinsic and extrinsic plas- mons in the hard x-ray photoelectron spectra of nearly free electron metals,

    Mohammad Balal, Shuvam Sarkar, Pramod Bhakuni, Andrei Gloskovskii, Aparna Chakrabarti, and Sudipta Roy Barman, “Intrinsic and extrinsic plas- mons in the hard x-ray photoelectron spectra of nearly free electron metals,” Phys. Rev. B109, 205419 (2024)

    2024

  54. [55]

    Many-electron singularity in x-ray photoemission and x-ray line spectra from met- als,

    S Doniach and M Sunjic, “Many-electron singularity in x-ray photoemission and x-ray line spectra from met- als,” Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics3, 285–291 (1970)

    1970

  55. [56]

    Singularities in the x-ray absorption and emission of metals. iii. one- body theory exact solution,

    P. Nozi` eres and C. T. De Dominicis, “Singularities in the x-ray absorption and emission of metals. iii. one- body theory exact solution,” Phys. Rev.178, 1097–1107 (1969)

    1969

  56. [57]

    Many-body effects in transition metals: role of the density of states,

    G K Wertheim and L R Walker, “Many-body effects in transition metals: role of the density of states,” Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics6, 2297–2306 (1976)

    1976

  57. [58]

    Collective excitations in x-ray spectra of metals,

    G. D. Mahan, “Collective excitations in x-ray spectra of metals,” Phys. Rev. B11, 4814–4824 (1975)

    1975

  58. [59]

    Predicting x-ray photo- electron peak shapes: the effect of electronic structure,

    Christopher R. O’Connor, Matthijs A. van Spronsen, Mustafa Karatok, Jorge Boscoboinik, Cynthia M. Friend, and Matthew M. Montemore, “Predicting x-ray photo- electron peak shapes: the effect of electronic structure,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C125, 10685–10692 (2021)

    2021

  59. [60]

    Xps insights: Asymmetric peak shapes in xps,

    David J. Morgan, “Xps insights: Asymmetric peak shapes in xps,” Surface and Interface Analysis55, 567–571 (2023)

    2023

  60. [61]

    Excitation energy de- pendence of core-level x-ray-photoemission-spectra line shapes in metals,

    J. W. Gadzuk and M. ˇSunji´ c, “Excitation energy de- pendence of core-level x-ray-photoemission-spectra line shapes in metals,” Phys. Rev. B12, 524–530 (1975)

    1975

  61. [62]

    Theoretical study of plasmon loss peaks in core-level photoemission spectra: energy and angular dependence,

    H Shinotsuka, T Uwatoko, T Konishi, and T Fujikawa, “Theoretical study of plasmon loss peaks in core-level photoemission spectra: energy and angular dependence,” J. Surf. Anal14, 332 (2008)

    2008

  62. [63]

    Plasmons in core-level photoemission spectra of al(111),

    C. Biswas, A. K. Shukla, S. Banik, V. K. Ahire, and S. R. Barman, “Plasmons in core-level photoemission spectra of al(111),” Phys. Rev. B67, 165416 (2003)

    2003

  63. [64]

    Bulk- and surface-plasmon-loss intensities in photoelec- tron, auger, and electron-energy-loss spectra of al metal,

    P. M. Th., M. van Attekum, and J. M. Trooster, “Bulk- and surface-plasmon-loss intensities in photoelec- tron, auger, and electron-energy-loss spectra of al metal,” Phys. Rev. B18, 3872–3883 (1978)

    1978

  64. [65]

    Gpaw: An open python package for electronic structure calculations,

    Jens Jørgen Mortensen, Ask Hjorth Larsen, Mikael Kuisma, Aleksei V. Ivanov, Alireza Taghizadeh, An- drew Peterson, Anubhab Haldar, Asmus Ougaard Dohn, Christian Sch¨ afer, Elvar ¨Orn J´ onsson, Eric D. Hermes, Fredrik Andreas Nilsson, Georg Kastlunger, Gianluca Levi, Hannes J´ onsson, Hannu H¨ akkinen, Jakub Fojt, Jiban Kangsabanik, Joachim Sødequist, Jou...

    2024

  65. [66]

    Real-space grid implementation of the projector aug- mented wave method,

    J. J. Mortensen, L. B. Hansen, and K. W. Jacobsen, “Real-space grid implementation of the projector aug- mented wave method,” Phys. Rev. B71, 035109 (2005)

    2005

  66. [67]

    Elec- tronic structure calculations with gpaw: a real-space im- plementation of the projector augmented-wave method,

    J Enkovaara, C Rostgaard, J J Mortensen, J Chen, M Du/suppress lak, L Ferrighi, J Gavnholt, C Glinsvad, V Haikola, H A Hansen, H H Kristoffersen, M Kuisma, A H Larsen, L Lehtovaara, M Ljungberg, O Lopez-Acevedo, P G Moses, J Ojanen, T Olsen, V Petzold, N A Romero, J Stausholm-Møller, M Strange, G A Tritsaris, M Vanin, M Walter, B Hammer, H H¨ akkinen, G K...

    2010

  67. [68]

    Doping dependent plasmon dispersion in 2h-transition metal dichalcogenides,

    Eric M¨ uller, Bernd B¨ uchner, Carsten Habenicht, An- dreas K¨ onig, Martin Knupfer, Helmuth Berger, and Simo Huotari, “Doping dependent plasmon dispersion in 2h-transition metal dichalcogenides,” Phys. Rev. B94, 035110 (2016). 1 Supplemental material and supporting information for Plasmon Engineering in Intercalated vdW Materials Luigi Cameranoa,b, Laur...

    2016

  68. [69]

    Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals,

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, “Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals,” Phys. Rev. B47, 558–561 (1993)

    1993

  69. [70]

    From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method,

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, “From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method,” Phys. Rev. B59, 1758–1775 (1999)

    1999

  70. [71]

    Generalized gradient approximation made simple,

    John P. Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzerhof, “Generalized gradient approximation made simple,” Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865–3868 (1996)

    1996

  71. [72]

    Toward exploring the structure of monolayer to few-layer TaS 2 by efficient ultrasound-free exfoliation,

    Yiwei Hu, Qiaoyan Hao, Baichuan Zhu, Biao Li, Zhan Gao, Yan Wang, and Kaibin Tang, “Toward exploring the structure of monolayer to few-layer TaS 2 by efficient ultrasound-free exfoliation,” Nanoscale Research Letters13(2018), 10.1186/s11671-018-2439-z

    work page doi:10.1186/s11671-018-2439-z 2018

  72. [73]

    J Dijkstra, P J Zijlema, C F van Bruggen, C Haas, and R A de Groot, “Band-structure calculations of Fe 1/3TaS2 and Mn 1/3TaS2, and transport and magnetic properties of Fe 0.28TaS2,′′ JournalofPhysics: CondensedMatter1,6363–6379(1989)

    1989

  73. [74]

    Large anomalous Hall effect and slow relaxation of the magnetization in Fe 1/3TaS2,

    Sebastian Mangelsen, Julian Hansen, Peter Adler, Walter Schnelle, Wolfgang Bensch, Sergiy Mankovsky, Svitlana Polesya, and Hubert Ebert, “Large anomalous Hall effect and slow relaxation of the magnetization in Fe 1/3TaS2,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C124, 24984–24994 (2020)

    2020

  74. [75]

    Composition dependence of bulk properties in the co-intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide co 1/3Tas2,

    Pyeongjae Park, Woonghee Cho, Chaebin Kim, Yeochan An, Maxim Avdeev, Kazuki Iida, Ryoichi Kajimoto, and Je-Geun Park, “Composition dependence of bulk properties in the co-intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide co 1/3Tas2,” Phys. Rev. B109, L060403 (2024)

    2024

  75. [76]

    Occupation matrix control of d- and f-electron localisations using dft + u,

    Jeremy P. Allen and Graeme W. Watson, “Occupation matrix control of d- and f-electron localisations using dft + u,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.16, 21016–21031 (2014)

    2014

  76. [77]

    Gpaw: An open python package for electronic structure calculations,

    Jens Jørgen Mortensen, Ask Hjorth Larsen, Mikael Kuisma, Aleksei V. Ivanov, Alireza Taghizadeh, Andrew Peterson, Anubhab Haldar, Asmus Ougaard Dohn, Christian Sch¨ afer, Elvar¨Orn J´ onsson, Eric D. Hermes, Fredrik Andreas Nilsson, Georg Kastlunger, Gianluca Levi, Hannes J´ onsson, Hannu H¨ akkinen, Jakub Fojt, Jiban Kangsabanik, Joachim Sødequist, Jouko ...

    2024

  77. [78]

    Real-space grid implementation of the projector augmented wave method,

    J. J. Mortensen, L. B. Hansen, and K. W. Jacobsen, “Real-space grid implementation of the projector augmented wave method,” Phys. Rev. B71, 035109 (2005)

    2005

  78. [79]

    Electronic structure calculations with gpaw: a real-space implementation of the projector augmented-wave method,

    J Enkovaara, C Rostgaard, J J Mortensen, J Chen, M Du/suppress lak, L Ferrighi, J Gavnholt, C Glinsvad, V Haikola, H A Hansen, H H Kristoffersen, M Kuisma, A H Larsen, L Lehtovaara, M Ljungberg, O Lopez-Acevedo, P G Moses, J Ojanen, T Olsen, V Petzold, N A Romero, J Stausholm-Møller, M Strange, G A Tritsaris, M Vanin, M Walter, B Hammer, H H¨ akkinen, G K...

    2010

  79. [80]

    Emergent 3d fermiology and magnetism in an intercalated van der waals system,

    Luigi Camerano, Emanuel A. Mart´ ınez, Victor Por´ ee, Laura Martella, Dario Mastrippolito, Debora Pierucci, Franco D’Orazio, Polina M. Sheverdyaeva, Paolo Moras, Enrico Della Valle, Tianlun Yu, Moritz Hoesch, Craig M. Polley, Thia- garajan Balasubramanian, Alessandro Nicolaou, Luca Ottaviano, Vladimir N. Strocov, Gianni Profeta, and Federico Bisti, “Emer...

    2026

  80. [81]

    Electronic structure of -ta2o5 with oxygen vacancy: ab initio calculations and comparison with experiment,

    Maxim V. Ivanov, Timofey V. Perevalov, Vladimir S. Aliev, Vladimir A. Gritsenko, and Vasily V. Kaichev, “Electronic structure of -ta2o5 with oxygen vacancy: ab initio calculations and comparison with experiment,” Journal of Applied Physics110, 024115 (2011), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.3606416/15078473/0241151online.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3606416/15078473/0241151online.pdf 2011

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 4, 2026.