arxiv: 2604.00340 · v3 · submitted 2026-04-01 · 🧮 math.OC

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Extended State Observer for Localized Fault Awareness in RF Accelerating Structures

Luke S. Baker , Sungil Kwon , Kwame Jyamfi , Quinten Cole , Isaac Roybal , AJ Garcia , Phil Torrez , Lawrence Castellano

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 23:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC

keywords extended state observerRF cavity controlfault localizationdetuning estimationphase driftaccelerator diagnosticsdisturbance observerlinear accelerator operation

0 comments

The pith

An extended state observer regulates RF cavity fields precisely while assigning deviations to the correct subsystem.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an observer for RF accelerating structures by adding states that track cavity detuning and phase drifts caused by the drive and receiver chains. This lets the system keep the cavity fields regulated accurately while identifying which subsystem is responsible for any observed deviation. Monte Carlo simulations under conditions meant to match high-power linear accelerator operation test how well the estimator works. The approach gives a basis for better fault detection and quicker maintenance decisions in large facilities.

Core claim

Augmenting a standard cavity field observer with additional states to estimate the evolution of cavity detuning and phase drifts induced by the drive and receiver chains allows the system to maintain precise field regulation and assign observed deviations to the correct subsystem, as demonstrated by Monte Carlo simulations under realistic high-power conditions.

What carries the argument

The extended state observer with added states that model detuning and phase drifts, which estimates their time evolution to separate contributions from different parts of the RF system.

If this is right

Precise cavity field regulation is maintained despite the presence of detuning and phase disturbances.
Deviations are assigned reliably to the drive chain, receiver chain, or cavity itself.
The diagnostic output supplies a foundation for improved fault detection in RF accelerating structures.
Faster troubleshooting becomes possible during accelerator operation.
More informed decisions about maintenance of RF systems in large facilities are supported.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This localized awareness could shorten downtime in operating accelerators by directing repair crews to the right subsystem without lengthy diagnostics.
The same state-augmentation pattern might be tested on other feedback loops that suffer from slowly varying but unmeasured offsets, such as temperature-induced drifts in precision instrumentation.
Integration with existing beam-quality monitors could allow the observer output to trigger automated corrective actions before beam loss occurs.

Load-bearing premise

The disturbances from detuning and phase drifts can be adequately captured by the added states in the observer model under realistic high-power conditions.

What would settle it

Deployment on a real high-power RF cavity where the observer is shown to assign a known injected disturbance to the wrong subsystem more often than the simulated reliability would predict.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.00340 by AJ Garcia, Isaac Roybal, Kwame Jyamfi, Lawrence Castellano, Luke S. Baker, Phil Torrez, Quinten Cole, Sungil Kwon.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Simplified block diagram of the LLRF control sys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Representative MC realizations (showing 10/10k) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Likelihood that the average amplitude and phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Likelihood that the average error over time between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

An observer framework is presented for robust regulation of RF cavity fields and localized identification of disturbances in RF systems. A standard cavity field observer is augmented with additional states to estimate the evolution of cavity detuning and phase drifts induced by the drive and receiver chains. Monte Carlo simulations are performed to assess the performance of the proposed estimator under realistic conditions for the intended high-power linear accelerator operation. Results showcase precise cavity field regulation and the reliability with which the observer assigns deviations to the correct subsystem. The resulting diagnostic capability provides a foundation for improved fault detection, faster troubleshooting during accelerator operation, and more informed maintenance of RF systems in large accelerator facilities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper adds detuning and phase-drift states to a standard extended state observer for RF cavities and shows via Monte Carlo that it can regulate fields while assigning faults to the right subsystem, but the linear model may miss real cross-couplings.

read the letter

The core contribution is a direct extension of existing ESO methods: they tack on extra states to track cavity detuning and phase drifts from the drive and receiver chains, then use that to localize disturbances in RF accelerating structures. The Monte Carlo runs under high-power conditions demonstrate tight field regulation and decent subsystem assignment, which lines up with the practical goal of faster troubleshooting in accelerators. That part is useful and grounded in standard observer theory applied to a concrete setting. The simulations give at least moderate support for the claims on paper. The main soft spot is the independence assumption between the added states. Detuning often couples to phase through amplitude-dependent effects like Lorentz forces or thermal feedback in real high-power operation, and a linear ESO structure does not include those cross terms. If the Monte Carlo runs omitted them, the reported localization reliability could be overstated. The abstract also stays light on tuning details, exact error metrics, and model assumptions, so the evidence feels thinner than it needs to be for a strong claim. This is aimed at RF control engineers working on large accelerators rather than a general control-theory audience. A reader already dealing with cavity diagnostics might pick up a workable idea here, but it is not going to change broader methods. The thinking is clear and the extension is honest, so the paper deserves a serious referee even with the model gaps. I would send it to peer review and ask for checks on nonlinear couplings and more transparent metrics.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper presents an extended state observer (ESO) framework for RF accelerating structures that augments a standard cavity field observer with additional states to estimate detuning and phase drifts induced by drive and receiver chains. Monte Carlo simulations are used to evaluate performance under conditions relevant to high-power linear accelerator operation, with claims of precise cavity field regulation and reliable assignment of deviations to the correct subsystems, providing a basis for improved fault detection and maintenance.

Significance. If the results hold, the method extends standard observer theory to enable localized disturbance identification in RF systems, offering a practical diagnostic capability for fault awareness that could improve troubleshooting and reliability in large accelerator facilities.

major comments (1)

[Monte Carlo simulations] The Monte Carlo simulations (as described in the performance assessment) treat detuning and phase-drift states as independent in the linear ESO structure, but omit potential nonlinear cross-couplings (e.g., amplitude-dependent phase shifts from Lorentz-force or thermal feedback) that arise under high-power conditions; this directly undermines the central claim of reliable subsystem assignment.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract lacks any details on model assumptions, parameter tuning, or quantitative error metrics for the Monte Carlo runs, which reduces clarity on how performance was quantified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Monte Carlo simulations] The Monte Carlo simulations (as described in the performance assessment) treat detuning and phase-drift states as independent in the linear ESO structure, but omit potential nonlinear cross-couplings (e.g., amplitude-dependent phase shifts from Lorentz-force or thermal feedback) that arise under high-power conditions; this directly undermines the central claim of reliable subsystem assignment.

Authors: We acknowledge that the ESO is formulated as a linear structure assuming independent states for detuning and phase drifts, with Monte Carlo simulations performed under this model to evaluate estimation accuracy and subsystem assignment. This linear framework is presented as an initial step toward localized fault awareness, and the simulations demonstrate reliable performance within the modeled conditions relevant to high-power operation. Nonlinear cross-couplings (such as amplitude-dependent effects from Lorentz force or thermal feedback) are indeed omitted, as extending the observer to a nonlinear form lies outside the current scope. We will revise the manuscript to include an explicit discussion of these modeling assumptions, their potential impact on fault localization claims, and directions for future nonlinear extensions, thereby clarifying the context and limitations of the reported results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected in ESO augmentation or validation

full rationale

The paper augments a standard extended state observer with additional states for detuning and phase drifts induced by drive/receiver chains, then evaluates via Monte Carlo simulations under high-power conditions. No load-bearing derivation step reduces by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or self-citation chains; the claims of precise field regulation and subsystem assignment follow directly from the observer dynamics and independent simulation outcomes. This is self-contained against external ESO benchmarks with no quoted reduction of predictions to inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the approach rests on standard assumptions from observer-based control theory for RF systems.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5419 in / 945 out tokens · 37733 ms · 2026-05-13T23:01:37.969731+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

A standard cavity field observer is augmented with additional states to estimate the evolution of cavity detuning and phase drifts... Monte Carlo simulations... precise cavity field regulation and the reliability with which the observer assigns deviations to the correct subsystem.
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The state-space representation... A=ΔωJ−ω1/2I, B=ω1/2R(φfwd), C=R(φrec).

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

[1]

John Wiley & Sons, 2008

Thomas P Wangler.RF Linear Accelerators. John Wiley & Sons, 2008

work page 2008
[2]

John Wiley & Sons, 2008

Hasan Padamsee, Jens Knobloch, and Tomas Hays.RF superconduc- tivity for accelerators. John Wiley & Sons, 2008

work page 2008
[3]

Coupled resonator model of linear accelerator tanks

DE Nagel. Coupled resonator model of linear accelerator tanks. In Conference on Proton Linear Accelerators, MURA, volume 714, page 21ff, 1964

work page 1964
[4]

Coupled resonator model for standing wave accelerator tanks.Review of Scientific Instruments, 38(11):1583–1587, 1967

DE Nagle, EA Knapp, and BC Knapp. Coupled resonator model for standing wave accelerator tanks.Review of Scientific Instruments, 38(11):1583–1587, 1967

work page 1967
[5]

Springer Nature, 2022

Stefan Simrock and Zheqiao Geng.Low-level radio frequency systems. Springer Nature, 2022

work page 2022
[6]

The los alamos meson physics facility

Donald A Swenson. The los alamos meson physics facility. Technical report, Los Alamos Scientific Lab., NM, 1973

work page 1973
[7]

Lansce 201 mhz and 805 mhz rf system experience

JK Young, G Bolme, J Lyles, M Lynch, E Partridge, and D Rees. Lansce 201 mhz and 805 mhz rf system experience. In2007 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC), pages 2412–2414. IEEE, 2007

work page 2007
[8]

Cavity tuning for the lampf 805 mhz linac

GR Swain, RA Jameson, R Kandarian, DJ Liska, ER Martin, James M Potter, et al. Cavity tuning for the lampf 805 mhz linac. In1972 Linac Conference, 1973

work page 1973
[9]

Stabilization of the drift tube linac by operation in theπ/2 cavity mode

DA Swenson, EA Knapp, JM Potter, and EJ Schneider. Stabilization of the drift tube linac by operation in theπ/2 cavity mode. InProc. 6th Intl. Conf. on High Energy Accelerators, pages 167–173, 1967

work page 1967
[10]

Lampf proton linac performance

Robert A Jameson. Lampf proton linac performance. Technical report, Los Alamos Scientific Lab., N. Mex.(USA), 1975

work page 1975
[11]

Design, fabrication, installation and operation of new 201 mhz rf system at lansce.Proc

John Lyles, Walter Barkley, Ray Bratton, Mark Prokop, Daniel Rees, et al. Design, fabrication, installation and operation of new 201 mhz rf system at lansce.Proc. LINAC’16, pages 3446–3448, 2016

work page 2016
[12]

Iterative extremum seeking for feedforward compensation of beam loading in particle accelerator rf cavities

Alexander Scheinker. Iterative extremum seeking for feedforward compensation of beam loading in particle accelerator rf cavities. In 2017 American Control Conference (ACC), pages 2459–2464. IEEE, 2017

work page 2017
[13]

Post-dtl beam delivery

Charles Edward Taylor, En-Chuan Huang, and Martin Joseph Kay. Post-dtl beam delivery. Technical report, Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States), 2025

work page 2025
[14]

Lansce beam transport model enhancement and validation

Clara-Marie Alvinerie, Charles Edward Taylor, and En-Chuan Huang. Lansce beam transport model enhancement and validation. Technical report, Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States), 2025

work page 2025
[15]

Control of cavities with high beam loading.IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 32(5):1852–1856, 2007

Daniel Boussard. Control of cavities with high beam loading.IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 32(5):1852–1856, 2007

work page 2007
[16]

Ex- tremum seeking-based control system for particle accelerator beam loss minimization.IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 30(5):2261–2268, 2021

Alexander Scheinker, En-Chuan Huang, and Charles Taylor. Ex- tremum seeking-based control system for particle accelerator beam loss minimization.IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 30(5):2261–2268, 2021

work page 2021
[17]

Ramona Leewe, Zahra Shahriari, and Mehrdad Moallem. Resonance frequency control of rf normal conducting cavity using gradient estimator of reflected power.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 869:172–179, 2017

work page 2017
[18]

Lansce rf system refurbishment

Daniel Rees, G Bolme, J Bradley, S Kwon, J Lyles, M Lynch, M Prokop, W Reass, and K Young. Lansce rf system refurbishment. In 2007 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC), pages 2400–2402. IEEE, 2007

work page 2007
[19]

Lansce-r low level rf control system

Mark Prokop, Sungil Kwon, Phillip Torrez, and Stephen Ruggles. Lansce-r low level rf control system. In2007 IEEE Particle Acceler- ator Conference (PAC), pages 2388–2390. IEEE, 2007

work page 2007
[20]

Lansce digital low level rf upgrade

Paula Jo Van Rooy, Mark S Prokop, Sung Il Kwon, Phillip Anthony Torrez, Lawrence James Castellano, Aaron Thomas Archuleta, and Colton Daniel Marchwinski. Lansce digital low level rf upgrade. Technical report, Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), 2022

work page 2022
[21]

Rf system upgrade for low energy dtl cavity at lansce

JTM Lyles, RE Bratton, TW Hall, and M Sanchez Barrueta. Rf system upgrade for low energy dtl cavity at lansce. In5th North American Particle Accelerator Conference (NAPAC’22), Albuquerque, NM, USA, 07-12 August 2022, pages 478–481. JACOW Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland, 2022

work page 2022
[22]

Fpga based dsp board for llrf (simcon 3.0)

Wojciech Giergusiewicz, Waldemar Koprek, Wojciech Jalmuzna, Krzysztof T Pozniak, and Ryszard S Romaniuk. Fpga based dsp board for llrf (simcon 3.0). InPhotonics Applications in Industry and Research IV, volume 5948, pages 110–120. SPIE, 2005

work page 2005
[23]

Fpga implementation of a control system for the lansce accelerator.Proc

Sungil Kwon, Lawrence Castellano, David Knapp, M Prokop, P Tor- rez, Alexander Scheinker, J Lyles, and D Rees. Fpga implementation of a control system for the lansce accelerator.Proc. IPAC’16, pages 2771–2773, 2016

work page 2016
[24]

Digital low level rf control sys- tem for the international linear collider.Physical Review Accelerators and Beams, 21(8):082004, 2018

Sigit Basuki Wibowo, Toshihiro Matsumoto, Shinichiro Michizono, Takako Miura, Feng Qiu, and Na Liu. Digital low level rf control sys- tem for the international linear collider.Physical Review Accelerators and Beams, 21(8):082004, 2018

work page 2018
[25]

Schilcher

T. Schilcher. Vector sum control of rf cavities.Proceedings of the Linear Accelerator Conference, 2002

work page 2002
[26]

Preliminary study of advanced llrf controls at lansce for beam loading compensation in the marie x-fel

Alexander Scheinker, M Prokop, Joseph Bradley III, P Torrez, L Castellano, S Kwon, D Knapp, and John Lyles. Preliminary study of advanced llrf controls at lansce for beam loading compensation in the marie x-fel. InProc. North Amer. Part. Accel. Conf, pages 411–413, 2017

work page 2017
[27]

Fpga implementation of a prototype pi feedback control system for the lansce accelerator

Sungil Kwon, Lawrence Castellano, Mark Prokop, Philip Torrez, and Alexander Scheinker. Fpga implementation of a prototype pi feedback control system for the lansce accelerator. In2011 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (CCA), pages 1178–1183. IEEE, 2011

work page 2011
[28]

2πlow drift phase detector for high-precision measurements

Szymon Jablonski, Krzysztof Czuba, Frank Ludwig, and Holger Schlarb. 2πlow drift phase detector for high-precision measurements. IEEE transactions on nuclear science, 62(3):1142–1148, 2015

work page 2015
[29]

DESY Hamburg, Germany, 1998

Thomas Schilcher.Vector sum control of pulsed accelerating fields in Lorentz force detuned superconducting cavities. DESY Hamburg, Germany, 1998

work page 1998
[30]

Low-level rf control development for the european x-fel

SN Simrock. Low-level rf control development for the european x-fel. InPhotonics Applications in Industry and Research IV, volume 5948, pages 31–45. SPIE, 2005

work page 2005
[31]

High gain proportional rf control stability at tesla cavities.Physical Review Special Topics—Accelerators and Beams, 10(5):052001, 2007

Elmar V ogel. High gain proportional rf control stability at tesla cavities.Physical Review Special Topics—Accelerators and Beams, 10(5):052001, 2007

work page 2007
[32]

Opti- mization of a traveling wave superconducting rf cavity for upgrading the international linear collider.Physical Review Accelerators and Beams, 25(2):021001, 2022

Valery Shemelin, Hasan Padamsee, and Vyacheslav Yakovlev. Opti- mization of a traveling wave superconducting rf cavity for upgrading the international linear collider.Physical Review Accelerators and Beams, 25(2):021001, 2022

work page 2022
[33]

The spallation neutron source accelerator low level rf control system

M Champion, M Crofford, H Ma, M Piller, A Ratti, L Doolittle, M Monroy, S De Santis, H Shoaee, K Kasemir, et al. The spallation neutron source accelerator low level rf control system. InProceedings of the 2003 Particle Accelerator Conference, volume 5, pages 3377–

work page 2003
[34]

Design of an optimal and robust controller for a free-electron laser exploiting symmetries of the rf- system

Sven Pfeiffer, Gerwald Lichtenberg, Christian Schmidt, Holger Schlarb, and Herbert Werner. Design of an optimal and robust controller for a free-electron laser exploiting symmetries of the rf- system. In2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 4253–4258. IEEE, 2012

work page 2012
[35]

Model-predictive control of power supply for particle accelerators.Nuclear Science and Techniques, 25, 2014

Qian Xiangping, Yao Zeen, and Wang Qiang. Model-predictive control of power supply for particle accelerators.Nuclear Science and Techniques, 25, 2014

work page 2014
[36]

Enhancing srf cavity stability and minimizing detuning with data-driven resonance control based on dynamic mode decompo- sition.AIP Advances, 13(7), 2023

Faya Wang. Enhancing srf cavity stability and minimizing detuning with data-driven resonance control based on dynamic mode decompo- sition.AIP Advances, 13(7), 2023

work page 2023
[37]

Extremum seeking for rf cavity resonance control

Alexander Scheinker. Extremum seeking for rf cavity resonance control. In2016 American Control Conference (ACC), pages 6079– 6084, 2016

work page 2016
[38]

Application of extremum seeking for time- varying systems to resonance control of rf cavities.IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 25(4):1521–1528, 2016

Alexander Scheinker. Application of extremum seeking for time- varying systems to resonance control of rf cavities.IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 25(4):1521–1528, 2016

work page 2016
[39]

Adaptive machine learning for robust diagnos- tics and control of time-varying particle accelerator components and beams.Information, 12(4):161, 2021

Alexander Scheinker. Adaptive machine learning for robust diagnos- tics and control of time-varying particle accelerator components and beams.Information, 12(4):161, 2021

work page 2021
[40]

Dynamic lorentz force compensation with a fast piezoelectric tuner

M Liepe, Wolf-Dietrich Moeller, and Stefan N Simrock. Dynamic lorentz force compensation with a fast piezoelectric tuner. In PACS2001. Proceedings of the 2001 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No. 01CH37268), volume 2, pages 1074–1076. IEEE, 2001

work page 2001
[41]

observation and numerical calculation of lorentz-detuning for the cryomodule test of stf baseline cavities at kek-stf.PAC09, Vancouver, Canada, 2009

Y Yamamoto, H Hayano, E Kako, T Matsumoto, S Michizono, T Miura, S Noguchi, M Sato, T Shishido, and K Watanabe. observation and numerical calculation of lorentz-detuning for the cryomodule test of stf baseline cavities at kek-stf.PAC09, Vancouver, Canada, 2009

work page 2009
[42]

Estimation of superconducting cavity bandwidth and de- tuning using a luenberger observer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.21207, 2025

Bozo Richter, Andrea Bellandi, Julien Branlard, Leon Speidel, and An- nika Eichler. Estimation of superconducting cavity bandwidth and de- tuning using a luenberger observer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.21207, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[43]

Drift observations and mitigation in lcls-ii rf.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.16392, 2023

L Doolittle, SD Murthy, A Benwell, D Chabot, J Chen, B Hong, S Hoobler, J Nelson, and C Xu. Drift observations and mitigation in lcls-ii rf.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.16392, 2023

work page arXiv 2023
[44]

The spallation neutron source rf reference system

Maurice Piller, M Champion, M Crofford, Hengjie Ma, and Lawrence Doolittle. The spallation neutron source rf reference system. In Proceedings of the 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference, pages 3573–

work page 2005
[45]

Adaptive method for electron bunch profile prediction.Physical Review Special Top- ics—Accelerators and Beams, 18(10):102801, 2015

Alexander Scheinker and Spencer Gessner. Adaptive method for electron bunch profile prediction.Physical Review Special Top- ics—Accelerators and Beams, 18(10):102801, 2015

work page 2015
[46]

Feng Qiu, Shinichiro Michizono, Takako Miura, Toshihiro Matsumoto, Mathieu Omet, and Basuki Wibowo Sigit. Application of distur- bance observer-based control in low-level radio-frequency system in a compact energy recovery linac at kek.Physical Review Special Topics—Accelerators and Beams, 18(9):092801, 2015

work page 2015
[47]

Application of disturbance observer- based control on pulsed superconducting radio frequency cavities

Feng Qiu, Takako Miura, Dai Arakawa, Nao Higashi, Yosuke Honda, Eiji Kako, Toshihiro Matsumoto, Shinichiro Michizono, Tsukasa Miyajima, Takashi Obina, et al. Application of disturbance observer- based control on pulsed superconducting radio frequency cavities. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams, 24(1):012804, 2021

work page 2021
[48]

John Vincent, Dan Morris, Nathan Usher, Zhiqiang Gao, Shen Zhao, Achille Nicoletti, and Qinling Zheng. On active disturbance rejec- tion based control design for superconducting rf cavities.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 643(1):11–16, 2011

work page 2011
[49]

Digital low-level rf conctrols for future superconducting linear colliders

SN Simrock. Digital low-level rf conctrols for future superconducting linear colliders. InProceedings of the 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference, pages 515–519. IEEE, 2005

work page 2005
[50]

Iterative tuning of the beam feedforward controller for lansce linac digital low level rf control system.Proc

Sungil Kwon, A Archuleta, L Castellano, M Prokop, P Van Rooy, CR Rose, and P Torrez. Iterative tuning of the beam feedforward controller for lansce linac digital low level rf control system.Proc. NAPAC2022, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, 2022

work page 2022
[51]

Superconducting radio-frequency cavities.Annual review of nuclear and particle science, 64(1):175–196, 2014

Hasan S Padamsee. Superconducting radio-frequency cavities.Annual review of nuclear and particle science, 64(1):175–196, 2014

work page 2014