pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.00646 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-01 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Hyperon non-leptonic decays in relativistic Chiral Perturbation Theory with resonances

Nora Salone (1) , Fernando Alvarado (2) , Stefan Leupold (3) , Andrzej Kupsc (3 , 4) ((1) University of Silesia in Katowice , Poland , (2) GSI Helmholtzzentrum f\"ur Schwerionenforschung GmbH , Germany
show 4 more authors
(3) Uppsala universitet Sweden (4) National Centre for Nuclear Research Poland)
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 22:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords hyperon non-leptonic decayschiral perturbation theoryresonance saturationrelativistic correctionss-wave amplitudesp-wave amplitudesweak low-energy constantsNLO calculation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A relativistic NLO chiral perturbation theory calculation with resonance saturation achieves a good combined fit to both s- and p-wave amplitudes for hyperon non-leptonic decays.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper carries out the first relativistic next-to-leading-order calculation of non-leptonic hyperon decays in chiral perturbation theory. It evaluates loop corrections from the ground-state octet and decuplet fields explicitly and estimates the weak-transition low-energy constants by saturation with the 1/2- and excited 1/2+ resonance octets. The remaining parameters are fitted directly to measured amplitudes. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach supplies a systematic, relativistic framework for these decays that simultaneously accounts for both parity-violating and parity-conserving parts, with the resonances turning out to be indispensable for the description.

Core claim

Motivated by recent experimental advances, non-leptonic hyperon decays are calculated for the first time in a relativistic manner in chiral perturbation theory at next-to-leading order. Relativistic loop corrections are computed explicitly based on the ground-state octet and decuplet fields. The NLO weak-transition low-energy constants are estimated by resonance saturation using the 1/2- and excited 1/2+ resonance octets. The remaining unknown parameters are fitted to the decay amplitudes. A good combined fit to both s- and p-wave amplitudes is achieved with the caveat of not being very tightly constrained, and the role of the resonances is found to be crucial.

What carries the argument

Resonance saturation of the NLO weak-transition low-energy constants using the 1/2^- and excited 1/2^+ resonance octets, combined with explicit relativistic loop corrections from the ground-state octet and decuplet fields.

If this is right

  • The calculation supplies a systematic relativistic framework for including higher-order effects in baryon weak decays.
  • Resonance contributions are required to describe both s- and p-wave amplitudes at the same time.
  • The fitted parameters can be used to predict amplitudes for additional hyperon decay channels.
  • Consequences for related processes and open questions about tighter constraints are identified in the work.
  • The approach opens the door to consistent inclusion of further resonance states or electromagnetic corrections.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same resonance-saturation technique could be tested on non-leptonic decays of other baryons where relativistic kinematics are important.
  • Direct comparison with future lattice-QCD evaluations of the weak amplitudes would provide an independent check on the saturation estimates.
  • Higher-precision data on the existing amplitudes would likely reduce the present loose constraints on the low-energy constants.
  • The framework suggests that analogous relativistic treatments may improve descriptions of related CP-violating observables in the baryon sector.

Load-bearing premise

The NLO weak-transition low-energy constants can be reliably estimated by resonance saturation using the 1/2- and excited 1/2+ resonance octets, with the fitted parameters capturing the dominant physics without large higher-order contamination.

What would settle it

A new, precise measurement of an s- or p-wave amplitude (or a combination) that lies significantly outside the range reproducible by adjusting the fit parameters within the resonance-saturation scheme would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.00646 by (2) GSI Helmholtzzentrum f\"ur Schwerionenforschung GmbH, (3) Uppsala universitet, 4) ((1) University of Silesia in Katowice, (4) National Centre for Nuclear Research, Andrzej Kupsc (3, Fernando Alvarado (2), Germany, Nora Salone (1), Poland, Poland), Stefan Leupold (3), Sweden.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Tree-level diagrams including resonances. The dashed, solid and wiggle lines correspond to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Loop diagrams contributing to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Loop diagrams that contribute to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Results of the combined fit to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Size comparison of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Results of the combined fit to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Size comparison of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Motivated by recent experimental advances in the corresponding measurements, non-leptonic hyperon decays are calculated, for the first time in a relativistic manner, in Chiral Perturbation Theory at next-to-leading order (NLO). On the one hand, relativistic loop corrections are computed explicitly based on the ground-state octet and decuplet fields. On the other hand, the NLO weak-transition low-energy constants are estimated by resonance saturation, inspired by the non-relativistic tree-level computation of Ref. [1]. In particular, the $1/2^-$ and the (excited) $1/2^+$ resonance octets are utilized. The remaining unknown parameters are fitted to the decay amplitudes. A good combined fit to both $s$- and $p$-wave amplitudes is achieved with the caveat of not being very tightly constrained. The role of the resonances is found to be crucial. Consequences for further investigations and open questions are addressed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript calculates non-leptonic hyperon decays for the first time in relativistic Chiral Perturbation Theory at NLO. It computes explicit relativistic loop corrections from the ground-state octet and decuplet baryons, estimates the NLO weak-transition low-energy constants by resonance saturation using the 1/2^- and excited 1/2^+ resonance octets (inspired by the non-relativistic tree-level approach of Ref. [1]), fits the remaining unknown parameters to the experimental s- and p-wave amplitudes, and reports a good combined fit with the resonances playing a crucial role.

Significance. If the resonance saturation values prove consistent once inserted into the relativistic loop framework, the calculation would supply a more uniform relativistic treatment than prior heavy-baryon approaches, with explicit loops providing a concrete advance. The work also supplies a concrete benchmark for future lattice-QCD comparisons and highlights the numerical importance of resonance contributions, though the limited tightness of the fit restricts its predictive reach.

major comments (2)
  1. [Resonance saturation section (Sec. 3.2 / Eq. (15)–(18))] The resonance-saturation procedure for the NLO weak LECs is taken directly from the non-relativistic tree-level Ref. [1] and inserted into the relativistic loop calculation. No explicit verification is shown that these numerical values remain stable once the relativistic loop integrals (with their altered power counting and finite parts) are evaluated; any mismatch can be absorbed by the fitted parameters, weakening the claim that the resonances themselves are the dominant improvement.
  2. [Numerical results and fit (Sec. 5 / Table 2)] The combined fit to s- and p-wave amplitudes is reported as good but “not very tightly constrained.” Because the remaining NLO weak-transition parameters are adjusted directly to the same decay data being described, the quality of the fit largely reflects the flexibility of the parametrization rather than an independent test of the resonance-saturation hypothesis.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Conclusions] The abstract states that the fit is “not very tightly constrained”; this important caveat should be repeated quantitatively (e.g., with the number of free parameters and the size of the uncertainties) in the conclusions.
  2. [Loop integrals (Sec. 4)] A short paragraph comparing the present relativistic loop results with the corresponding heavy-baryon expressions would help readers assess the size of the relativistic corrections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major points below, providing clarifications and indicating revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Resonance saturation section (Sec. 3.2 / Eq. (15)–(18))] The resonance-saturation procedure for the NLO weak LECs is taken directly from the non-relativistic tree-level Ref. [1] and inserted into the relativistic loop calculation. No explicit verification is shown that these numerical values remain stable once the relativistic loop integrals (with their altered power counting and finite parts) are evaluated; any mismatch can be absorbed by the fitted parameters, weakening the claim that the resonances themselves are the dominant improvement.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the resonance-saturation values are adopted as estimates from the non-relativistic tree-level calculation of Ref. [1] and inserted into our relativistic NLO framework without an additional dedicated stability check under the altered relativistic power counting. The relativistic loop integrals are computed explicitly and separately for the ground-state octet and decuplet baryons. While any potential mismatch between the tree-level estimates and the full relativistic result can indeed be partially absorbed by the fitted parameters, the manuscript demonstrates that the inclusion of these resonance contributions is crucial for achieving a good simultaneous description of both s- and p-wave amplitudes. To clarify this point, we have added a short explanatory sentence in Sec. 3.2 stating that the resonance values serve as input estimates and that the overall consistency of the fit with data supports their use in the relativistic context. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Numerical results and fit (Sec. 5 / Table 2)] The combined fit to s- and p-wave amplitudes is reported as good but “not very tightly constrained.” Because the remaining NLO weak-transition parameters are adjusted directly to the same decay data being described, the quality of the fit largely reflects the flexibility of the parametrization rather than an independent test of the resonance-saturation hypothesis.

    Authors: We agree that the remaining NLO weak-transition parameters are fitted directly to the experimental s- and p-wave amplitudes, so the fit quality necessarily reflects the flexibility of the parametrization. The paper already states explicitly that the fit is “not very tightly constrained.” Nevertheless, the calculation shows that the resonance-saturation contributions play a crucial role: without them the simultaneous description of s- and p-waves deteriorates markedly. The approach therefore supplies a concrete relativistic benchmark and highlights the numerical importance of resonances, even if it does not constitute a fully independent test of the saturation hypothesis. No further revision is required, as the existing caveats in Sec. 5 and the abstract already convey this limitation. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: explicit fit to data with independent relativistic loop computation

full rationale

The paper computes relativistic loop corrections explicitly from the ground-state octet and decuplet fields and estimates a subset of NLO weak LECs via resonance saturation drawn from external prior work. The remaining parameters are openly fitted to the s- and p-wave amplitudes, and the text reports the resulting fit quality without relabeling the fit as an independent prediction. No equation reduces to its input by construction, no self-citation chain bears the central claim, and no ansatz is smuggled without external justification. The procedure is standard for ChPT with undetermined constants and remains falsifiable against the quality of the fit and future observables.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on standard chiral symmetry assumptions plus the specific choice to saturate NLO constants with resonances and to fit remaining parameters to data.

free parameters (1)
  • remaining unknown NLO weak-transition parameters
    Fitted to experimental s- and p-wave decay amplitudes after resonance saturation of other LECs.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Chiral symmetry and associated power counting in relativistic ChPT
    Standard assumption invoked for organizing the effective Lagrangian and loop corrections.
  • ad hoc to paper Resonance saturation accurately estimates the NLO weak LECs
    Inspired by non-relativistic tree-level work and applied here to the relativistic case.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5536 in / 1371 out tokens · 39699 ms · 2026-05-13T22:28:53.730425+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages · 29 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    small scale expansion

    Lowest-lying hadrons The mesonic LagrangiansL (2) ϕ ,L (4) ϕ are standard and given in Ref. [21]. We briefly describe the lowest-order relativistic chiral Lagrangian for the ground-state octet and decuplet baryons [5, 22–28]: L(1) ϕBT = tr ¯B i /D −m B B + D 2 tr ¯Bγ µγ5 {uµ, B} + F 2 tr ¯Bγ µγ5 [uµ, B] + ¯T µ abc h iγµνα (DαT ν)abc −γ µνmT (T ν)abc i + H...

    work page

  2. [2]

    resonances

    process reads L∆S=1 = 4GF√ 2 VudV ∗ us¯uγµPLs ¯dγµPLu ,(12) withG F the Fermi constant,Vthe CKM matrix,P L the left-handed chiral projection operator. The corresponding weak transition Lagrangian for baryons reads [5]: LW(0) ϕBT =h D tr ¯B{h+, B} +h F tr ¯B[h+, B] +h C ¯T µ abc (h+)c d T abd µ , (13) withh + =u †(h+h †)uand h=   0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0   .(...

    work page

  3. [3]

    βϕ +γ ϕ log M2 ϕ µ2 !# +α M2 ϕ 16π2 ˚F 2π

    are solutions to the system of equations composed by Eqs. (22, 23) assuming the ∆I= 1/2 limit. See main text for details. 8 C. Perturbative calculation In this section, the perturbative calculation of thes-andp-wave amplitudes is discussed. It is an O(M 2 K) relativistic ChPT calculation with explicit decuplet fields and including tree-level resonant con-...

    work page

  4. [4]

    1d, 1e) introduce the coupling constants related to the strong decays of the resonances,R→ϕB

    Resonance parameters from strong decays The contributions of the 1/2− and (excited) 1/2+ octets to the hyperon non-leptonic decays (Figs. 1d, 1e) introduce the coupling constants related to the strong decays of the resonances,R→ϕB. These LECs appear inL (1) ϕR−B,L (1) ϕR+B, displayed in Eqs. (16) and (17), respectively. In general, we follow the spirit of...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Contributions to s- and p-wave amplitudes The tree-level diagrams (including resonances) are depicted in Fig. 1. The loop diagrams contributing to thes-andp-waves are depicted in Fig. 2 and 3, respectively. Notice that allp-wave diagrams in Fig. 3, except 3u-3x, contain the direct transition, i.e. the mixing of two baryon states. Some of the topologies ha...

    work page

  6. [6]

    We quantify a theoretical error and incorporate it in the denominator of theχ 2 in order to make a meaningful comparison between data and theory

    Estimation of the theoretical uncertainty As in any effective field theory computation, the effect of the systematic uncertainty has to be assessed. We quantify a theoretical error and incorporate it in the denominator of theχ 2 in order to make a meaningful comparison between data and theory. On the one hand, the truncation of the chiral series at NLO in...

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    initial state

    The condition (A1) fixes then all non-vanishing values (up to an overall normalization). For the octet, these considerations imply that all matrix elements vanish except forh 2 3 = 1. The process mediated by this choice forh a b changes the isospin by ∆I= 1/2 (and the strangeness by one unit). For the 27-plet, the choiceh 21 31 =h 12 31 =h 21 13 =h 12 13 ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    The role of resonances in non-leptonic hyperon decays

    B. Borasoy and B. R. Holstein, Phys. Rev. D59, 094025 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9902351

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  9. [9]

    T. Blum, P. A. Boyle, D. Hoying, T. Izubuchi, L. Jin, C. Jung, C. Kelly, C. Lehner, A. Soni, and M. Tomii (RBC, UKQCD), Phys. Rev. D108, 094517 (2023), arXiv:2306.06781 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    J. F. Donoghue, E. Golowich, and B. R. Holstein,Dynamics of the Standard Model(Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    Bijnens, H

    J. Bijnens, H. Sonoda, and M. B. Wise, Nucl. Phys. B261, 185 (1985)

    work page 1985

  12. [12]

    E. E. Jenkins, Nucl. Phys. B375, 561 (1992)

    work page 1992

  13. [13]

    Flores-Mendieta, Phys

    R. Flores-Mendieta, Phys. Rev. D99, 094033 (2019), arXiv:1902.05602 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    Non-leptonic hyperon decays in chiral perturbation theory

    B. Borasoy and B. R. Holstein, Eur. Phys. J. C6, 85 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9805430

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  15. [15]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Nature Phys.15, 631 (2019), arXiv:1808.08917 [hep-ex]

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Nature Phys.15, 631 (2019), arXiv:1808.08917 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Nature606, 64 (2022), arXiv:2105.11155 [hep-ex]

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Nature606, 64 (2022), arXiv:2105.11155 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Salone, P

    N. Salone, P. Adlarson, V. Batozskaya, A. Kupsc, S. Leupold, and J. Tandean, Phys. Rev. D105, 116022 (2022), arXiv:2203.03035 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    Renormalization of relativistic baryon chiral perturbation theory and power counting

    T. Fuchs, J. Gegelia, G. Japaridze, and S. Scherer, Phys. Rev. D68, 056005 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0302117

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  19. [19]

    Geng, Front

    L. Geng, Front. Phys. (Beijing)8, 328 (2013), arXiv:1301.6815 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2013

  20. [20]

    Resonances in radiative hyperon decays

    B. Borasoy and B. R. Holstein, Phys. Rev. D59, 054019 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9902431

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  21. [21]

    Ecker, J

    G. Ecker, J. Gasser, A. Pich, and E. de Rafael, Nucl. Phys.B321, 311 (1989)

    work page 1989

  22. [22]

    J. F. Donoghue, C. Ramirez, and G. Valencia, Phys. Rev. D39, 1947 (1989)

    work page 1947

  23. [23]

    Ecker, J

    G. Ecker, J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler, A. Pich, and E. de Rafael, Phys. Lett.B223, 425 (1989)

    work page 1989

  24. [24]

    Epelbaum, U.-G

    E. Epelbaum, U.-G. Meißner, W. Gloeckle, and C. Elster, Phys. Rev. C65, 044001 (2002), arXiv:nucl- th/0106007

    work page arXiv 2002

  25. [25]

    Resonance saturation in the odd-intrinsic parity sector of low-energy QCD

    K. Kampf and J. Novotny, Phys. Rev. D84, 014036 (2011), arXiv:1104.3137 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  26. [26]

    Bijnens and G

    J. Bijnens and G. Ecker, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.64, 149 (2014), arXiv:1405.6488 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2014

  27. [27]

    Roy-Steiner-equation analysis of pion-nucleon scattering

    M. Hoferichter, J. Ruiz de Elvira, B. Kubis, and U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Rept.625, 1 (2016), arXiv:1510.06039 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  28. [28]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B250, 465 (1985)

    work page 1985

  29. [29]

    E. E. Jenkins, Nucl. Phys. B368, 190 (1992)

    work page 1992

  30. [30]

    Holmberg and S

    M. Holmberg and S. Leupold, Eur. Phys. J. A54, 103 (2018), arXiv:1802.05168 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    M. F. M. Lutz and E. E. Kolomeitsev, Nucl. Phys. A700, 193 (2002), arXiv:nucl-th/0105042

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  32. [32]

    Baryon self energies in the chiral loop expansion

    A. Semke and M. F. M. Lutz, Nucl. Phys. A778, 153 (2006), arXiv:nucl-th/0511061

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  33. [33]

    Electromagnetic excitation of the Delta(1232)-resonance

    V. Pascalutsa, M. Vanderhaeghen, and S. N. Yang, Phys. Rept.437, 125 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0609004

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  34. [34]

    L. S. Geng, J. Martin Camalich, L. Alvarez-Ruso, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 222002 (2008), arXiv:0805.1419 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  35. [35]

    C. J. G. Mommers and S. Leupold, Phys. Rev. D106, 093001 (2022), arXiv:2208.11078 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    T. R. Hemmert, B. R. Holstein, and J. Kambor, J. Phys. G24, 1831 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9712496

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  37. [37]

    Cirigliano, G

    V. Cirigliano, G. Ecker, H. Neufeld, A. Pich, and J. Portoles, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 399 (2012), arXiv:1107.6001 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2012

  38. [38]

    Chiral Perturbation Theory for |Delta I|=3/2 Hyperon Decays

    A. Abd El-Hady, J. Tandean, and G. Valencia, Nucl. Phys. A651, 71 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9808322

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  39. [39]

    |Delta I|=3/2 Decays of the Omega^- in Chiral Perturbation Theory

    J. Tandean and G. Valencia, Phys. Lett. B452, 395 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9810201

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  40. [40]

    Abbottet al.(RBC, UKQCD), Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(RBC, UKQCD), Phys. Rev. D102, 054509 (2020), arXiv:2004.09440 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2020

  41. [41]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 101801 (2024), arXiv:2309.14667 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Hyperon Nonleptonic Decays in Chiral Perturbation Theory Reexamined

    A. Abd El-Hady and J. Tandean, Phys. Rev. D61, 114014 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9908498. 24

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  44. [44]

    Wang, L.-S

    E. Wang, L.-S. Geng, J.-J. Wu, J.-J. Xie, and B.-S. Zou, Chin. Phys. Lett.41, 101401 (2024), arXiv:2406.07839 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Nishibuchi and T

    T. Nishibuchi and T. Hyodo, EPJ Web Conf.271, 10002 (2022), arXiv:2208.14608 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    Crede and J

    V. Crede and J. Yelton, Rept. Prog. Phys.87, 106301 (2024), arXiv:2502.08815 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    M. K. Banerjee and J. Milana, Phys. Rev. D54, 5804 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9508340

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  48. [48]

    S. R. Beane and U. van Kolck, J. Phys. G31, 921 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0212039

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  49. [49]

    Gell-Mann (1961), California Institute of Technology Report CTSL-20, TID-12608

    M. Gell-Mann (1961), California Institute of Technology Report CTSL-20, TID-12608

    work page 1961

  50. [50]

    Okubo, Prog

    S. Okubo, Prog. Theor. Phys.27, 949 (1962)

    work page 1962

  51. [51]

    Okubo, Prog

    S. Okubo, Prog. Theor. Phys.28, 24 (1962)

    work page 1962

  52. [52]

    Scherer and M

    S. Scherer and M. R. Schindler, Lect. Notes Phys.830, 10.1007/978-3-642-19254-8 (2012)

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19254-8 2012

  53. [53]

    P. B. Siegel and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. C38, 2221 (1988)

    work page 1988

  54. [54]

    Quark mass dependence of s-wave baryon resonances

    C. Garcia-Recio, M. F. M. Lutz, and J. Nieves, Phys. Lett. B582, 49 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0305100

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  55. [55]

    E. E. Kolomeitsev and M. F. M. Lutz, Phys. Lett. B585, 243 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0305101

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  56. [56]

    V. K. Magas, E. Oset, and A. Ramos, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 052301 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0503043

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  57. [57]

    Mai and U.-G

    M. Mai and U.-G. Meißner, Nucl. Phys. A900, 51 (2013), arXiv:1202.2030 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2013

  58. [58]

    J. M. M. Hall, W. Kamleh, D. B. Leinweber, B. J. Menadue, B. J. Owen, A. W. Thomas, and R. D. Young, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 132002 (2015), arXiv:1411.3402 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2015

  59. [59]

    Bulavaet al.(Baryon Scattering (BaSc)), Phys

    J. Bulavaet al.(Baryon Scattering (BaSc)), Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 051901 (2024), arXiv:2307.10413 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    First measurement of the absolute branching fractions of $\Sigma^+$ nonleptonic decays and test of the $\Delta I = 1/2$ rule

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), First measurement of the absolute branching fractions of Σ + nonleptonic decays and test of the ∆I= 1/2 rule (2025), arXiv:2512.09628 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 131801 (2022), arXiv:2204.11058 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  62. [62]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Test ofCPSymmetry in the Neutral Decays of Λ viaJ/ψ→Λ ¯Λ (2025), arXiv:2510.24333 [hep-ex]

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Test ofCPSymmetry in the Neutral Decays of Λ viaJ/ψ→Λ ¯Λ (2025), arXiv:2510.24333 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Precise Measurement of Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry with Entangled Hyperon Antihyperon Pairs (2026), arXiv:2602.20524 [hep-ex]

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Precise Measurement of Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry with Entangled Hyperon Antihyperon Pairs (2026), arXiv:2602.20524 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Phys. Rev. D108, L031106 (2023), arXiv:2305.09218 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 141804 (2025), arXiv:2503.17165 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 191802 (2023), arXiv:2304.14655 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    M. Lu, M. B. Wise, and M. J. Savage, Phys. Lett. B337, 133 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9407260

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  68. [68]

    Can the Lambda pi scattering phase shifts be large?

    J. Tandean, A. W. Thomas, and G. E. Valencia, Phys. Rev. D64, 014005 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0011214

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  69. [69]

    The S-wave \Lambda\pi phase shift is not large

    U.-G. Meißner and J. A. Oller, Phys. Rev. D64, 014006 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0011293

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  70. [70]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Annals Phys.158, 142 (1984)

    work page 1984

  71. [71]

    Ordinary muon capture on a proton in manifestly Lorentz invariant baryon chiral perturbation theory

    S.-i. Ando and H. W. Fearing, Phys. Rev. D75, 014025 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0608195

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  72. [72]

    D.-L. Yao, D. Siemens, V. Bernard, E. Epelbaum, A. M. Gasparyan, J. Gegelia, H. Krebs, and U.-G. Meißner, JHEP05, 038 (2016), arXiv:1603.03638 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  73. [73]

    Alvarado and L

    F. Alvarado and L. Alvarez-Ruso, Rev. Mex. Fis. Suppl.3, 0308095 (2022)

    work page 2022

  74. [74]

    New Developments in FeynCalc 9.0

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, Comput. Phys. Commun.207, 432 (2016), arXiv:1601.01167 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  75. [75]

    Shtabovenko, R

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, Comput. Phys. Commun.256, 107478 (2020), arXiv:2001.04407 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  76. [76]

    Mertig, M

    R. Mertig, M. Bohm, and A. Denner, Comput. Phys. Commun.64, 345 (1991)

    work page 1991

  77. [77]

    FeynHelpers: Connecting FeynCalc to FIRE and Package-X

    V. Shtabovenko, Comput. Phys. Commun.218, 48 (2017), arXiv:1611.06793 [physics.comp-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  78. [78]

    H. H. Patel, Comput. Phys. Commun.197, 276 (2015), arXiv:1503.01469 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  79. [79]

    H. H. Patel, Comput. Phys. Commun.218, 66 (2017), arXiv:1612.00009 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  80. [80]

    High statistics study of the reaction $\gamma p\to p\;2\pi^0$

    V. Sokhoyanet al.(CBELSA/TAPS), Eur. Phys. J. A51, 95 (2015), [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.A 51, 187 (2015)], arXiv:1507.02488 [nucl-ex]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

Showing first 80 references.