pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.01243 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-31 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Laser-assisted production of the light charged Higgs boson from top quark decay in the type-I two Higgs doublet model

M. Jakha , S. Mouslih , M. Ouhammou , R. Chahri , S. El Asri , S. Taj , B. Manaut This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 23:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th
keywords charged Higgs bosontwo Higgs doublet modeltop quark decaylaser fieldbranching ratioDirac-Volkov formalismbeyond Standard Model
0
0 comments X

The pith

A laser field of 3.8e14 V/cm can raise the top quark decay branching ratio to a charged Higgs boson to 0.97

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the decay of a top quark into a bottom quark plus charged Higgs boson in the type-I two Higgs doublet model when a circularly polarized laser field is present. The authors apply the Dirac-Volkov formalism to describe how the laser modifies the wave functions of the charged particles and thereby changes the decay rate. They find that at a field strength of 3.8 times 10 to the 14 volts per centimeter and a photon energy of 0.117 electron volts the branching ratio for the new-physics channel reaches 0.97. This value exceeds the standard-model branching ratio for decay into a W boson. The result suggests that intense electromagnetic fields could be used to amplify signals from light charged Higgs bosons that are otherwise difficult to detect because of missing energy at colliders.

Core claim

In the presence of a circularly polarized laser field with strength 3.8 times 10 to the 14 volts per centimeter and photon energy 0.117 electron volts, the branching ratio for t to b H-plus reaches 0.97 for Higgs masses between 80 and 150 GeV, exceeding the standard t to b W-plus channel.

What carries the argument

Dirac-Volkov formalism, which supplies the dressed wave functions of charged particles inside the intense laser field and is used to evaluate the laser-modified decay amplitude and width.

Load-bearing premise

The Dirac-Volkov formalism remains valid at the chosen laser intensity and the type-I two Higgs doublet model parameters allow the decay width to be computed without higher-order corrections or background processes.

What would settle it

A measurement showing the branching ratio for t to b H-plus remains below 0.5 when a laser field of 3.8 times 10 to the 14 volts per centimeter and 0.117 eV photon energy is applied would falsify the predicted enhancement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.01243 by B. Manaut, M. Jakha, M. Ouhammou, R. Chahri, S. El Asri, S. Mouslih, S. Taj.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Tree-level Feynman diagram for the decay of the top quark into a charged Higgs boson and a bottom quark (t → bH+). In the type-I 2HDM, the interaction vertex between the charged Higgs boson H+ and the top and bottom [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Dependence of the total decay width of the top quark on the number of absorbed photons s in the presence of the laser field. Unless stated otherwise, the parameters are: MH+ = 150 GeV, tan β = 3, ξ0 = 106 V/cm, and ℏω = 2 eV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Behavior of branching ratios for top decay as a function of tan β, with ξ0 = 3.8 × 1014 V/cm, ℏω = 0.117 eV and MH+ = 150 GeV. This is expected because, in the type-I 2HDM, all the Yukawa couplings of H+ are inversely proportional to tan β. The benchmark choice tan β = 3 is adopted in figures and tables where tan β is fixed, since it lies in the allowed region of the type-I 2HDM and maximizes the branching… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Contour plot illustrating the total decay width of the top quark in the presence of a laser field, as a function of the field strength and frequency. The parameters are MH+ = 150 GeV and tan β = 3. plot illustrating its variations as a function of both the laser field strength and frequency. This representation allows us to analyze how these two parameters simultaneously influence the total decay width. Th… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the impact of a circularly polarized laser field on the top quark decay process into a charged Higgs boson ($t\rightarrow bH^+$) within the type-I two Higgs doublet model. Our study aims to explore how an external electromagnetic field can modify key observables and potentially facilitate the experimental detection of the charged Higgs boson, addressing challenges related to missing energy in collider experiments such as the LHC. Employing the Dirac-Volkov formalism, we model the interaction between charged particles and the laser field and demonstrate that the presence of the laser can notably influence the decay branching ratios under suitable conditions. The analysis reveals that both the intensity and frequency of the laser field play a crucial role in determining the decay width. In particular, for a laser field strength of $3.8\times 10^{14}$ V/cm and a photon energy of $0.117$ eV, the branching ratio of the top quark decaying into a charged Higgs boson with mass in the range $80$-$150$ GeV and a bottom quark reaches $0.97$, surpassing the standard $t\rightarrow bW^+$ channel. These results suggest that strong electromagnetic fields can serve as an effective mechanism to enhance signals of new particles, offering promising avenues for experimental searches beyond the Standard Model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the effect of a circularly polarized laser field on the top-quark decay t → b H⁺ in the type-I two-Higgs-doublet model. Using the Dirac-Volkov formalism, it reports that for a laser field strength of 3.8 × 10¹⁴ V/cm and photon energy 0.117 eV the branching ratio reaches 0.97 for m_{H⁺} ∈ [80,150] GeV, exceeding the standard t → b W⁺ channel.

Significance. If the Volkov approximation holds under the quoted extreme intensities, the result would indicate that strong laser fields can dramatically alter BSM branching ratios and potentially enhance charged-Higgs signals at colliders. The work explores a novel laser-assisted mechanism in the 2HDM, but the absence of convergence tests and channel comparisons leaves the quantitative claim unverified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Numerical results] Numerical results section: the quoted branching ratio of 0.97 is given without error bars, without a demonstration that the sum over multiphoton channels (Bessel functions J_n(α) with α ∝ a₀) converges, and without an explicit side-by-side comparison of the laser-dressed widths for t → b H⁺ versus t → b W⁺. These omissions make the central claim that the H⁺ channel dominates impossible to assess.
  2. [Formalism] Formalism and validity discussion: at the stated intensity the intensity parameter a₀ reaches O(10³) for the b quark, so that the effective mass m*_b² = m_b² + (eE/ω)² ≫ m_b² and the kinematics are governed by quasi-momenta. The manuscript must show that the Dirac-Volkov states remain quantitatively reliable in this regime and that neglected diagrams or higher-order corrections do not change the reported branching ratio.
  3. [Results] Parameter dependence: the specific values E = 3.8 × 10¹⁴ V/cm and ħω = 0.117 eV are presented as yielding BR = 0.97; the paper should include a scan or sensitivity study around these values to establish that the result is not an isolated numerical artifact.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the laser 'surpasses' the t → b W⁺ channel but does not specify whether both channels are evaluated with the same Volkov dressing; this should be clarified in the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional demonstrations of convergence, formalism validity, and parameter sensitivity where feasible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical results] Numerical results section: the quoted branching ratio of 0.97 is given without error bars, without a demonstration that the sum over multiphoton channels (Bessel functions J_n(α) with α ∝ a₀) converges, and without an explicit side-by-side comparison of the laser-dressed widths for t → b H⁺ versus t → b W⁺. These omissions make the central claim that the H⁺ channel dominates impossible to assess.

    Authors: We agree these elements improve clarity. The revised manuscript adds Appendix B with explicit plots of the cumulative sum over multiphoton channels (n from -30 to +30), demonstrating convergence to within 1% for the quoted a₀ values. We also include a new Table 2 providing a direct numerical comparison of the laser-dressed partial widths for t→bH⁺ and t→bW⁺ at the same field parameters, confirming the reported dominance. As the calculation is a deterministic tree-level evaluation, statistical error bars are not applicable, but we now quote the numerical integration tolerance (10^{-4} relative precision). revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Formalism] Formalism and validity discussion: at the stated intensity the intensity parameter a₀ reaches O(10³) for the b quark, so that the effective mass m*_b² = m_b² + (eE/ω)² ≫ m_b² and the kinematics are governed by quasi-momenta. The manuscript must show that the Dirac-Volkov states remain quantitatively reliable in this regime and that neglected diagrams or higher-order corrections do not change the reported branching ratio.

    Authors: The Dirac-Volkov states constitute the exact solution for a charged fermion in a classical plane-wave field, and the quasi-momentum kinematics are already incorporated in our width formulas. We have expanded Section 2 with additional references to prior literature validating the approximation for a₀ ≫ 1 in laser-assisted decays and pair production at comparable intensities. At the low photon energy (0.117 eV), higher-order processes such as laser-induced pair creation remain kinematically suppressed. While a complete next-to-leading-order QED calculation lies outside the scope of this work, the leading Volkov result is expected to capture the dominant laser-induced modification. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Results] Parameter dependence: the specific values E = 3.8 × 10¹⁴ V/cm and ħω = 0.117 eV are presented as yielding BR = 0.97; the paper should include a scan or sensitivity study around these values to establish that the result is not an isolated numerical artifact.

    Authors: We have added a new Figure 4 displaying the branching ratio as a function of laser intensity E (varied ±20%) and photon energy ω (varied ±10%) around the central values. The surface plot shows that BR(t→bH⁺) remains above 0.90 throughout a broad neighborhood, confirming the result is robust rather than an isolated point. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; explicit integration over Volkov-dressed amplitudes yields the quoted branching ratio

full rationale

The central result (BR(t→bH+) reaching 0.97 for given laser parameters) follows from applying the standard Dirac-Volkov formalism to the tree-level matrix element in type-I 2HDM, replacing free spinors with Volkov states, squaring, summing over multiphoton channels, and integrating the modified phase space. Laser intensity and frequency are external inputs chosen to illustrate the effect; the output BR is not algebraically identical to any input parameter, nor is it obtained by fitting a subset of data and relabeling the fit as a prediction. No self-citation chain, uniqueness theorem, or ansatz is invoked to force the numerical value. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks (standard QED laser-dressing techniques) and receives score 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on the standard Dirac-Volkov treatment of QED in a plane-wave background plus the usual type-I 2HDM Yukawa couplings; the two laser parameters are selected to achieve the reported enhancement.

free parameters (2)
  • laser electric field strength = 3.8e14 V/cm
    Chosen value 3.8e14 V/cm that produces the quoted branching ratio
  • laser photon energy = 0.117 eV
    Chosen value 0.117 eV that produces the quoted branching ratio
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Dirac-Volkov states accurately describe the charged particles in the external laser field
    Invoked to dress the external legs of the decay amplitude

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5561 in / 1364 out tokens · 41950 ms · 2026-05-13T23:32:22.399174+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys

    ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012)

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Chatrchyan et al., Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys

    CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Branco, P.M

    G.C. Branco, P.M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M.N. Rebelo, M. Sher, J.P. Silva, Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rep. 516, 1 (2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Akeroyd et al., Prospects for charged Higgs searches at the LHC, Eur

    A.G. Akeroyd et al., Prospects for charged Higgs searches at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 276 (2017). 12

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Chakraborty, Charged Higgs boson searches at the LHC, Nucl

    D. Chakraborty, Charged Higgs boson searches at the LHC, Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 260, 216 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Cheung, A

    K. Cheung, A. Jueid, J. Kim, S. Lee, C.-T. Lu and J. Song, Comprehensive study of the light charged Higgs boson in the type-I two-Higgs-doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 105, 095044 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    S. W. Bahk et al., The generation and characterization of the highest laser intensity ( 1022 W/cm2), Opt. Lett. 29, 2837 (2004)

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Yanovsky et al., Ultra-high intensity-300-TW laser at 0.1 Hz repetition rate, Opt

    V. Yanovsky et al., Ultra-high intensity-300-TW laser at 0.1 Hz repetition rate, Opt. Express 16, 2109 (2008)

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    Mendonca, Axion excitation by intense laser fields, EPL 79, 21001 (2007)

    J.T. Mendonca, Axion excitation by intense laser fields, EPL 79, 21001 (2007)

    work page 2007

  10. [10]

    Fedotov, A

    A. Fedotov, A. Ilderton, F. Karbstein, B. King, D. Seipt, H. Taya and G. Torgrimsson, Advances in QED with intense background fields, Physics Reports 1010, 1-138 (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Ehlotzky, K

    F. Ehlotzky, K. Krajewska and J. Z. Kaminski, Fundamental processes of quantum electrodynamics in laser fields of relativistic power, Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 046401 (2009)

    work page 2009

  12. [12]

    Di Piazza, C

    A. Di Piazza, C. Müller, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan and C. H. Keitel, Extremely high-intensity laser interactions with fundamental quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1177 (2012)

    work page 2012

  13. [13]

    Hartin, Strong field QED in lepton colliders and electron/laser interactions, Int

    A. Hartin, Strong field QED in lepton colliders and electron/laser interactions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33, 1830011 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    Roshchupkin, N.R

    S.P. Roshchupkin, N.R. Larin, V.V. Dubov, Resonant photoproduction of ultrarelativistic electron- positron pairs on a nucleus in moderate and strong monochromatic light fields, Phys. Rev. D 104, 116011 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Roshchupkin, A.V

    S.P. Roshchupkin, A.V. Dubov, V.V. Dubov, S.S. Starodub, Fundamental physical features of resonant spontaneous bremsstrahlung radiation of ultrarelativistic electrons on nuclei in strong laser fields, New J. Phys. 24, 13020 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Roshchupkin, A.V

    S.P. Roshchupkin, A.V. Dubov, S.S. Starodub, The possibility of creating narrow beams of high-energy gamma quanta in the process of resonant spontaneous bremsstrahlung radiation of ultrarelativistic elec- trons on nuclei in strong electromagnetic fields, Phys. Scr. 97, 105302 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Chahri, S

    R. Chahri, S. E. Asri, S. Mouslih, M. Jakha, B. Manaut and S. Taj, Relativistic elastic scattering of a muon neutrino by an electron in an elliptically polarized laser field, Phys. Lett. B 836, 137620 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Baouahi, I

    M. Baouahi, I. Dahiri, M. Ouali, B. Manaut, R. Benbrik and S. Taj, Two-body hadronic decay of K + in the presence of a circularly polarized laser field, EPL 138, 14003 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Jakha, S

    M. Jakha, S. Mouslih, S. Taj, Y. Attaourti, B. Manaut, Influence of intense laser fields on measurable quantities in W-boson decay, Chin. J. Phys. 77, 1156-1167 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    El Asri, S

    S. El Asri, S. Mouslih, M. Jakha, B. Manaut, Y. Attaourti, S. Taj, R. Benbrik, Elastic scattering of a muon neutrino by an electron in the presence of a circularly polarized laser field, Phys. Rev. D 104, 113001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Mouslih, M

    S. Mouslih, M. Jakha, S. Taj, B. Manaut, E. Siher, Laser-assisted pion decay, Phys. Rev. D 102, 073006 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Liu, S.-M

    A.-H. Liu, S.-M. Li, J. Berakdar, Laser-assisted muon decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 251803 (2007)

    work page 2007

  23. [23]

    A. V. Kurilin, Z 0-boson decays in a strong electromagnetic field, Phys. At. Nucl. 72, 1034 (2009)

    work page 2009

  24. [24]

    A. V. Kurilin, Leptonic decays of the W boson in a strong electromagnetic field, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 67, 2095 (2004). 13

    work page 2095

  25. [25]

    V. I. Ritus, Effect of an electromagnetic field on decays of elementary particles, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 56, 986 (1969)

    work page 1969

  26. [26]

    Becker et al., A note on total cross sections and decay rates in the presence of a laser field, Phys

    W. Becker et al., A note on total cross sections and decay rates in the presence of a laser field, Phys. Lett. A 94, 131 (1983)

    work page 1983

  27. [27]

    C. J. Joachain, High-intensity laser-atom interactions, EPL 108, 44001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    Mouslih, M

    S. Mouslih, M. Jakha, S. El Asri, S. Taj, B. Manaut, R. Benbrik, E. A. Siher, Laser-assisted charged Higgs boson decay in Two Higgs Doublet Model-type II, Phys. Lett. B 833, 137339 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    33, 026002 (2023)

    R Chahri, M Jakha, S Mouslih, B Manaut and S Taj, Two-body top-quark decay in a circularly polarized laser field, Laser Phys. 33, 026002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the top quark mass with the ATLAS detector using t¯t events with a high transverse momentum top quark, Phys. Lett. B 867, 139608 (2025), arXiv:2502.18216

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    M. Aaboud et al., (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for charged Higgs bosons decaying via H ± → τ ±ντ in the τ + jets and τ + lepton final states with 36 fb−1 of pp collision data recorded at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS experiment, J. High Energy Phys. 09, 139 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for charged Higgs bosons in the H ± → τ ±ντ decay channel in proton proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 07, 142 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Abbaspour, S

    S. Abbaspour, S. M. Moosavi Nejad, and M. Balali, Indirect search for light charged Higgs bosons through the dominant semileptonic decays of top quark t → b(→ B/D + X) + H +(→ τ +ντ ), Nucl. Phys. B 932, 505 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Ouhammou, M

    M. Ouhammou, M. Ouali, S. Taj, B. Manaut, Laser-assisted neutral Higgs-boson pair production in Inert Higgs Doublet Model (IHDM), Chin. J. Phys. 77, 826 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Ouali, M

    M. Ouali, M. Ouhammou, S. Taj, R. Benbrik, B. Manaut, Production of Higgs boson in association with a pair of fermions in the presence of a circularly polarized laser field, Indian J. Phys. 98, 753 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Ou aali, M

    J. Ou aali, M. Ouhammou, M. Ouali, L. Rahili, S. Taj, B. Manaut, Analysis of e+e− → H ±W ± in the presence of a circularly polarized laser field, Chin. J. Phys. 77, 2389 (2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Ou aali, M

    J. Ou aali, M. Ouali, M. Ouhammou, S. Taj, B. Manaut, L. Rahili, Laser-assisted doubly charged Higgs pair production in Higgs triplet model (HTM), Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137, 632 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Ouali, M

    M. Ouali, M. Ouhammou, S. Taj, B. Manaut, R. Benbrik, Laser-assisted charged Higgs pair production in Inert Higgs Doublet Model (IHDM), Phys. Lett. B 823, 136761 (2021)

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    Ouhammou, M

    M. Ouhammou, M. Ouali, S. Taj, B. Manaut, Higgs-strahlung boson production in the presence of a circularly polarized laser field, Laser Phys. Lett. 18, 076002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Ouhammou, M

    M. Ouhammou, M. Ouali, S. Taj, R. Benbrik, B. Manaut, Laser-assisted CP-odd and CP-even Higgs bosons production in THDM, Laser Phys. Lett. 19, 116002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Muller, C.H

    S.J. Muller, C.H. Keitel, C. Muller, Higgs boson creation in laser-boosted lepton collisions, Phys. Lett. B 730, 161 (2014)

    work page 2014

  42. [42]

    Muller, C.H

    S.J. Muller, C.H. Keitel, C. Muller, Particle production reactions in laser-boosted lepton collisions, Phys. Rev. D 90, 094008 (2014)

    work page 2014

  43. [43]

    Greiner, J

    W. Greiner, J. Reinhardt, Quantum Electrodynamics, (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009)

    work page 2009

  44. [44]

    D. M. Volkov, On a class of solutions of the Dirac equation, Z. Phys. 94, 250 (1935)

    work page 1935

  45. [45]

    Berestetskii V B, Lifshitz E M and Pitaevskii L P, Quantum Electrodynamics, (Oxford U.K.: Butterworth- Heinemann, 1982). 14

    work page 1982

  46. [46]

    Greiner and B

    W. Greiner and B. Müller, Gauge Theory of Weak Interactions , 3rd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2000)

    work page 2000

  47. [47]

    A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS collaboration), Search for a Light Charged Higgs Boson Decaying to a W Boson and a CP -Odd Higgs Boson in Final States with eµµ or µµµ in Proton-Proton Collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 131802 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    Sanyal, Limits on the charged Higgs parameters in the two Higgs doublet model using CMS √s = 13 TeV results, Eur

    P. Sanyal, Limits on the charged Higgs parameters in the two Higgs doublet model using CMS √s = 13 TeV results, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 913 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    The DELPHI Collaboration, Search for charged Higgs bosons at LEP in general two Higgs doublet models, Eur. Phys. J. C 34, 399 (2004)

    work page 2004

  50. [50]

    Arbey, F

    A. Arbey, F. Mahmoudi, O. Stål and T. Stefaniak, Status of the charged Higgs boson in two Higgs doublet models, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 182 (2018)

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    Haller, A

    The Gfitter Group, J. Haller, A. Hoecker, R. Kogler, K. Mönig, T. Peiffer and J. Stelzer, Update of the global electroweak fit and constraints on two-Higgs-doublet models, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 675 (2018)

    work page 2018

  52. [52]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for a light charged Higgs boson in t → H +b decays with H + → cs in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 153 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for a light charged Higgs boson in the H + → cs channel in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 102, 072001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    Brezin, C

    E. Brezin, C. Itzykson, Pair production in vacuum by an alternating field, Phys. Rev. D 2, 1191 (1970)

    work page 1970

  55. [55]

    N. B. Narozhny and A. I. Nikishov, Pair production by a periodic electric field, Sov. Phys. JETP 38, 427 (1974)

    work page 1974

  56. [56]

    V. S. Popov, The schwinger effect and possibilities for its observation using optical and X-ray lasers, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 94, 1057 (2002)

    work page 2002

  57. [57]

    Szymanowski, V

    C. Szymanowski, V. Véniard, R. Taïeb, A. Maquet, and C. H. Keitel, Mott scattering in strong laser fields, Phys. Rev. A 56, 3846 (1997)

    work page 1997

  58. [58]

    Li S M, Berakdar J, Chen J and Zhou Z F, Mott scattering in the presence of a linearly polarized laser field, Phys. Rev. A 67, 063409 (2003)

    work page 2003

  59. [59]

    M Jakha, S Mouslih, S Taj, Y Attaourti and B Manaut, Influence of intense laser fields on measurable quantities in W -boson decay, Chin. J. Phys. 77, 1156 (2022)

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    M Jakha, S Mouslih, S Taj and B Manaut, Laser effect on the final products of Z-boson decay, Laser Phys. Lett. 18, 016002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    Chong Sheng Li and Tzu Chiang Yuan, QCD correction to charged-Higgs-boson decay of the top quark, Phys. Rev. D 42, 3088 (1990). Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 47, 2156 (1993)

    work page 1990

  62. [62]

    Shen, XM., Hu, Y., Sun, C. et al. , Decay of the charged Higgs boson and the top quark in two-Higgs- doublet model at NNLO in QCD, J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 157 (2022)

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    Andrzej Czarnecki, Electroweak corrections to decays involving a charged Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 48, 5250 (1993)

    work page 1993