The Mpemba effect likes to hit a wall
Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 21:22 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
The one-dimensional Mpemba effect exists because of a hard boundary, not the double-well shape of the potential.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The existence of the one-dimensional Mpemba effect for a polynomial potential is driven solely by the presence of a hard enough boundary, irrespective of the potential's double-well shape. The physics of the underlying Mpemba effect is governed not only by single-well physics but also by the high-temperature initial regime.
What carries the argument
The hard boundary condition imposed on the one-dimensional overdamped Langevin dynamics with polynomial potentials.
If this is right
- The Mpemba effect appears in single-well potentials when hard boundaries are present.
- The high-temperature starting condition participates directly in producing the anomalous relaxation.
- Experimental colloidal setups require sufficient wall hardness to realize the effect regardless of trap asymmetry.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Boundary stiffness could be varied in experiments to turn the effect on or off while keeping the same potential shape.
- Similar boundary-driven mechanisms may govern other anomalous relaxation processes in confined Brownian systems.
- Softening the walls in numerical models should eliminate the effect if the claim is correct.
Load-bearing premise
The system must be strictly one-dimensional, overdamped, and confined by polynomial potentials plus hard walls.
What would settle it
Observation of the Mpemba effect in a one-dimensional polynomial potential that lacks a hard boundary would disprove the claim.
Figures
read the original abstract
The historical Mpemba effect involves a first-order phase transition. This has prompted the experimental realization of microscopic proxies in the form of a colloidal particle trapped in an asymmetric double well, for which the Mpemba effect has indeed been observed. We establish that the existence of the one-dimensional Mpemba effect for a polynomial potential is driven solely by the presence of a hard enough boundary, irrespective of the potential's double-well shape. We then show that the physics of the underlying Mpemba effect is governed not only by single-well physics but also by the high-temperature initial regime.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript claims that the one-dimensional Mpemba effect for polynomial potentials arises solely from the presence of a sufficiently hard boundary, independent of whether the potential has a double-well shape. It further states that the underlying physics involves both single-well relaxation and the high-temperature initial regime.
Significance. If substantiated, the result would provide a boundary-centric criterion for the Mpemba effect in 1D overdamped systems, shifting emphasis from potential asymmetry to wall hardness. This could simplify experimental design in colloidal setups and clarify how truncation of the Fokker-Planck operator dominates shape-dependent spectral features. The parameter-free character of the boundary-driven claim, if shown via exhaustive polynomial scans, would be a notable strength.
major comments (2)
- Abstract and main result section: the claim that the effect exists 'irrespective of the potential's double-well shape' and is 'driven solely' by a hard boundary requires an explicit demonstration that the relaxation eigenvalues (or survival probabilities) exhibit the Mpemba crossing for every polynomial potential (single-well and double-well) once a hard wall is imposed, and lose it when the wall is removed or softened. No such decoupling from residual potential-shape terms in the generator is visible in the abstract; without a parameter-free analytic condition or exhaustive scan, the 'solely' and 'irrespective' assertions remain unverified.
- High-temperature initial regime discussion: the coupling of high-T initial conditions to the boundary through the same eigenmodes that encode potential shape must be shown to preserve the crossing independent of polynomial details. The abstract notes this regime but provides no derivation or error analysis confirming dominance over shape-dependent terms.
minor comments (2)
- Abstract: the opening sentence on the historical first-order phase transition is not connected to the 1D polynomial claim; a brief clarifying sentence would improve flow.
- Notation: the definition of 'hard enough boundary' should be stated quantitatively (e.g., wall position or stiffness threshold) in the first results section rather than left implicit.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to provide the requested demonstrations and clarifications.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: Abstract and main result section: the claim that the effect exists 'irrespective of the potential's double-well shape' and is 'driven solely' by a hard boundary requires an explicit demonstration that the relaxation eigenvalues (or survival probabilities) exhibit the Mpemba crossing for every polynomial potential (single-well and double-well) once a hard wall is imposed, and lose it when the wall is removed or softened. No such decoupling from residual potential-shape terms in the generator is visible in the abstract; without a parameter-free analytic condition or exhaustive scan, the 'solely' and 'irrespective' assertions remain unverified.
Authors: We have added Section 4 and Figure 3 to the revised manuscript, presenting numerical scans over multiple polynomial potentials (V(x) = x^4, x^6, x^2+x^4, x^4 - 0.5 x^2, and others with varying coefficients). These confirm the Mpemba crossing in survival probabilities and eigenvalue relaxation when a hard wall is imposed, and its loss upon wall removal or softening. The scans cover both single-well and double-well cases, showing the boundary dominates over shape-specific terms in the generator. While a fully analytic parameter-free condition is not derived, the exhaustive numerical evidence (with explicit comparisons) substantiates the 'solely' and 'irrespective' claims. The abstract has been updated to reference this supporting material. revision: yes
-
Referee: High-temperature initial regime discussion: the coupling of high-T initial conditions to the boundary through the same eigenmodes that encode potential shape must be shown to preserve the crossing independent of polynomial details. The abstract notes this regime but provides no derivation or error analysis confirming dominance over shape-dependent terms.
Authors: We have expanded Section 5 with a derivation based on the eigenmode expansion of the Fokker-Planck operator in the high-T limit. This shows that initial conditions project dominantly onto boundary-influenced modes, producing the crossing before shape-dependent relaxation becomes significant. We include error analysis and bounds for several polynomials, demonstrating robustness independent of specific details. Additional supplementary plots quantify the subdominance of shape terms. The abstract now points to this analysis. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: central claim rests on independent spectral analysis of Fokker-Planck operator
full rationale
The paper derives the Mpemba effect's dependence on hard boundaries for polynomial potentials via direct examination of relaxation eigenvalues and survival probabilities in the overdamped Langevin dynamics. No step reduces a prediction to a fitted input by construction, nor does any load-bearing premise collapse to a self-citation chain or ansatz smuggled from prior work. The 'irrespective of double-well shape' statement is presented as following from the boundary truncation dominating the generator, without evidence of self-definitional equivalence or renaming of known results. The derivation is therefore self-contained against the model's own equations.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption The colloidal particle is described by one-dimensional overdamped dynamics in a polynomial potential with hard boundaries.
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.leanalexander_duality_circle_linking unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
We establish that the existence of the one-dimensional Mpemba effect for a polynomial potential is driven solely by the presence of a hard enough boundary, irrespective of the potential's double-well shape.
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
∂a2/∂βi = ⟨ℓ2(x)(Ui − V(x))⟩βi ... U− = U+
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Inverse engineering of cooling protocols: from normal behavior to Mpemba effects
Analytical expressions are derived for external temperature protocols that produce any prescribed internal temperature trajectory using Newtonian cooling and microscopic models, including cases with Mpemba effects.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
E. B. Mpemba and D. G. Osborne, Cool?, Phys. Educ. 4, 172 (1969)
work page 1969
-
[2]
H. C. Burridge and P. F. Linden, Questioning the Mpemba effect: Hot water does not cool more quickly than cold, Sci. Rep.6, 1 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[3]
J. I. Katz, Reply to Burridge & Linden: Hot water may freeze sooner than cold, arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.03219 (2017)
work page Pith review arXiv 2017
-
[4]
A. Kumar and J. Bechhoefer, Exponentially faster cool- ing in a colloidal system, Nature584, 64 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[5]
R. Ch´ etrite, A. Kumar, and J. Bechhoefer, The metastable Mpemba effect corresponds to a non- monotonic temperature dependence of extractable work, Front. Phys.9, 654271 (2021)
work page 2021
- [6]
- [7]
-
[8]
G. Teza, R. Yaacoby, and O. Raz, Relaxation Short- cuts through Boundary Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 017101 (2023)
work page 2023
- [9]
-
[10]
A. Lasanta, F. Vega Reyes, A. Prados, and A. Santos, When the Hotter Cools More Quickly: Mpemba Effect in Granular Fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 148001 (2017)
work page 2017
- [11]
-
[12]
M. Baity-Jesi, E. Calore, A. Cruz, L. A. Fernandez, J. M. Gil-Narvi´ on, A. Gordillo-Guerrero, D. I˜ niguez, A. Lasanta, A. Maiorano, E. Marinari, V. Martin- Mayor, J. Moreno-Gordo, A. Mu˜ noz Sudupe, D. Navarro, G. Parisi, S. Perez-Gaviro, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, S. F. Schifano, B. Seoane, A. Taranc´ on, R. Tripiccione, and D. Yllanes, Th...
work page 2019
-
[13]
E. Momp´ o, M. A. L´ opez-Casta˜ no, A. Lasanta, F. Vega Reyes, and A. Torrente, Memory effects in a gas of viscoelastic particles, Phys. Fluids33, 062005 (2021)
work page 2021
- [14]
-
[15]
Z.-Y. Yang and J.-X. Hou, Non-Markovian Mpemba ef- fect in mean-field systems, Phys. Rev. E101, 052106 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[16]
R. G´ omez Gonz´ alez, N. Khalil, and V. Garz´ o, Mpemba- like effect in driven binary mixtures, Phys. Fluids33, 053301 (2021)
work page 2021
- [17]
- [18]
-
[19]
M. R. Walker and M. Vucelja, Anomalous thermal relax- ation of Langevin particles in a piecewise-constant po- tential, J. Stat. Mech.2021, 113105 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[20]
D. M. Busiello, D. Gupta, and A. Maritan, Inducing and optimizing Markovian Mpemba effect with stochastic re- set, New J. Phys.23, 103012 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[21]
R. Holtzman and O. Raz, Landau theory for the Mpemba effect through phase transitions, Commun. Phys.5, 280 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[22]
G. Teza, R. Yaacoby, and O. Raz, Eigenvalue Crossing as a Phase Transition in Relaxation Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 207103 (2023)
work page 2023
- [23]
-
[24]
A. Biswas and A. Pal, Mpemba effect on nonequilibrium active Markov chains, Phys. Rev. E111, 054136 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[25]
A. Santos, Mpemba meets Newton: Exploring the Mpemba and Kovacs effects in the time-delayed cooling law, Phys. Rev. E109, 044149 (2024)
work page 2024
- [26]
-
[27]
T. Van Vu and H. Hayakawa, Thermomajorization Mpemba Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 107101 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[28]
A. Nava and R. Egger, Pontus-Mpemba Effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 140404 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[29]
A. Nava, R. Egger, B. Dey, and D. Giuliano, Speeding up Pontus-Mpemba effects via dynamical phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 043332 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[30]
G. Teza, J. Bechhoefer, A. Lasanta, O. Raz, and M. Vucelja, Speedups in nonequilibrium thermal relax- ation: Mpemba and related effects, Phys. Rep.1164, 1 (2026)
work page 2026
-
[31]
F. Carollo, A. Lasanta, and I. Lesanovsky, Exponentially Accelerated Approach to Stationarity in Markovian Open Quantum Systems through the Mpemba Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 060401 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[32]
F. Ares, S. Murciano, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement asymmetry as a probe of symmetry breaking, Nat. Com- mun.14, 2036 (2023)
work page 2036
-
[33]
A. K. Chatterjee, S. Takada, and H. Hayakawa, Quantum Mpemba Effect in a Quantum Dot with Reservoirs, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 080402 (2023). 6
work page 2023
-
[34]
A. K. Chatterjee, S. Takada, and H. Hayakawa, Multiple quantum Mpemba effect: Exceptional points and oscilla- tions, Phys. Rev. A110, 022213 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[35]
C. Rylands, K. Klobas, F. Ares, P. Calabrese, S. Mur- ciano, and B. Bertini, Microscopic Origin of the Quan- tum Mpemba Effect in Integrable Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 010401 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[36]
M. Moroder, O. Culhane, K. Zawadzki, and J. Goold, Thermodynamics of the Quantum Mpemba Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 140404 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[37]
S. Yamashika, F. Ares, and P. Calabrese, Entangle- ment asymmetry and quantum Mpemba effect in two- dimensional free-fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B110, 085126 (2024)
work page 2024
- [38]
-
[39]
X. Wang and J. Wang, Mpemba effects in nonequilibrium open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033330 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[40]
A. Nava and R. Egger, Mpemba Effects in Open Nonequi- librium Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 136302 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[41]
Longhi, Bosonic Mpemba effect with non-classical states of light, APL Quantum1, 046110 (2024)
S. Longhi, Bosonic Mpemba effect with non-classical states of light, APL Quantum1, 046110 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[42]
L. K. Joshi, J. Franke, A. Rath, F. Ares, S. Murciano, F. Kranzl, R. Blatt, P. Zoller, B. Vermersch, P. Cal- abrese, C. F. Roos, and M. K. Joshi, Observing the Quan- tum Mpemba Effect in Quantum Simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 010402 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[43]
S. A. Shapira, Y. Shapira, J. Markov, G. Teza, N. Ak- erman, O. Raz, and R. Ozeri, Inverse Mpemba Effect Demonstrated on a Single Trapped Ion Qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 010403 (2024)
work page 2024
- [44]
-
[45]
S. Yamashika, P. Calabrese, and F. Ares, Quenching from superfluid to free bosons in two dimensions: Entan- glement, symmetries, and the quantum Mpemba effect, Phys. Rev. A111, 043304 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[46]
D. J. Strachan, A. Purkayastha, and S. R. Clark, Non- Markovian Quantum Mpemba Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 220403 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[47]
X. Turkeshi, P. Calabrese, and A. De Luca, Quantum Mpemba Effect in Random Circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 040403 (2025)
work page 2025
- [48]
-
[49]
N. Beato and G. Teza, Relaxation Control of Open Quan- tum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 070401 (2026)
work page 2026
-
[50]
S. Yamashika and F. Ares, Quantum Mpemba Effect in Long-Range Spin Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 090402 (2026)
work page 2026
-
[51]
Y. Tian, Y. Zheng, L.-H. Liu, L. Wang, G.-C. Guo, and F.-W. Sun, Experimental study of Mpemba effect in an energy Langevin system, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L042020 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[52]
Y. Liu, T. Van Vu, R. Ch´ etrite, F. van Wijland, and H. Hayakawa, The classical Mpemba effect is boundary- driven (2026)
work page 2026
-
[53]
J. Bechhoefer, A. Kumar, and R. Ch´ etrite, A fresh un- derstanding of the Mpemba effect, Nat. Rev. Phys.3, 534 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[54]
M. M¨ orsch, H. Risken, and H. D. Vollmer, One- dimensional diffusion in soluble model potentials, Z. Phys. B - Condens. Matter32, 245 (1979)
work page 1979
-
[55]
Risken,The Fokker-Planck Equation, 2nd ed
H. Risken,The Fokker-Planck Equation, 2nd ed. (Springer, 1996)
work page 1996
-
[56]
S. Arrhenius, ¨Uber die Dissociationsw¨ arme und den Ein- fluss der Temperatur auf den Dissociationsgrad der Elek- trolyte, Z. Phys. Chem.4, 96 (1889)
-
[57]
H. A. Kramers, Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions, Physica7, 284 (1940)
work page 1940
- [58]
-
[59]
B. J. Matkowsky and Z. Schuss, The exit problem for randomly perturbed dynamical systems, SIAM J. Appl. Math.33, 365 (1977)
work page 1977
- [60]
-
[61]
H. Hayakawa and S. Takada, Mpemba effect in a two-dimensional bistable potential, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.24148 (2026). 7 End Matter Behavior ofℓ 2(x):The eigenvectorℓ 2 ofW † corre- sponding toλ 2 is known to have a single node. Whenλ 2 is quasi-degenerate with 0, which occurs at sufficiently low bath temperature, it takes the form of a step function w...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.