arxiv: 2604.02570 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-02 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.LG

Recognition: no theorem link

WSVD: Weighted Low-Rank Approximation for Fast and Efficient Execution of Low-Precision Vision-Language Models

Haiyu Wang , Yutong Wang , Jack Jiang , Sai Qian Zhang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 21:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.LG

keywords low-rank approximationvision-language modelsmodel compressionquantizationsingular value decompositionefficient inferencelow-precision modelsweighted SVD

0 comments

The pith

Weighted SVD at finer granularity with adaptive element weighting delivers over 1.8 times faster decoding in low-precision vision-language models while preserving accuracy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that conventional SVD-based low-rank approximations struggle to produce actual execution speedups in vision-language models because they are applied too coarsely and treat all weights equally. By decomposing matrices at a finer level and adaptively weighting each element according to its importance during the approximation, the method reduces computation more effectively. This Weighted SVD is then paired with quantization on both weights and activations to create an end-to-end efficient pipeline for tasks such as image captioning and visual question answering. A sympathetic reader would care because these models are widely used yet remain too slow for many real-time or edge applications, and the approach promises measurable latency gains without needing retraining or suffering accuracy loss.

Core claim

The central claim is that Weighted SVD (WSVD) outperforms prior SVD variants by applying singular value decomposition at finer granularity, adaptively allocating relative importance to weight elements to preserve accuracy, and combining the result with quantization of weights and activations, thereby achieving over 1.8 times decoding speedup in vision-language models while maintaining accuracy.

What carries the argument

Weighted SVD, which performs low-rank approximation by applying singular value decomposition at finer granularity and adaptively weighting elements by importance before quantization.

If this is right

Low-precision VLMs can run with substantially lower latency during decoding while retaining accuracy on image captioning and visual question answering.
The combination of finer-grained decomposition and adaptive weighting outperforms standard low-rank methods in practical execution time.
Quantization applied after the weighted approximation further improves efficiency without requiring post-hoc accuracy recovery steps.
The resulting models become more suitable for deployment where computational resources are limited.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same finer-granularity weighting pattern could be tested on other transformer-based architectures beyond vision-language models to check for similar speed gains.
If the latency reductions hold across hardware platforms, this would lower energy use for mobile or embedded AI applications that rely on VLMs.
Exploring whether the adaptive weighting can be learned jointly with the model rather than applied post-training might yield additional improvements.

Load-bearing premise

That applying SVD at finer granularity together with adaptive per-element weighting will produce measurable real-world latency reductions in VLM execution without causing accuracy degradation.

What would settle it

Measure decoding latency and task accuracy of a standard VLM before and after replacing its linear layers with WSVD plus quantization on a benchmark such as visual question answering; if latency does not drop by at least 1.5 times or accuracy falls noticeably, the central claim is false.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02570 by Haiyu Wang, Jack Jiang, Sai Qian Zhang, Yutong Wang.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: (a) Latency evaluation of VLM including self-attention (SA) and feed-forward (FFN) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: (a) Naive reconstruction requires materializing and writing back full [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: WSVD decoding pipeline. Each token is down-projected to low-rank latents, and K and V latents are appended to the cache, while Q latent is up-projected and consumed together with cached CKh, CV h in the fused kernel. Beyond kernel fusion, WSVD applies per-head SVD to the Query, Key, and Value projections to reduce parameters and improve efficiency. Decomposing WK and WV decreases model size and accelerates… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Latency evaluation and normalized latency on: (a) RTX 4090 and (b) RTX 5090. We assess the system-level performance of WSVD-noQ, with a focus on decoding-stage acceleration. Specifically, we measure the layer-wise decoding latency of LLaVA-Next 7B across the attention and feed-forward modules using our fused kernel implementation described in Section 3.4 on RTX 4090 and 5090 GPUs. For comparison, we inc… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) has become an important technique for reducing the computational burden of Vision Language Models (VLMs), which play a central role in tasks such as image captioning and visual question answering. Although multiple prior works have proposed efficient SVD variants to enable low-rank operations, we find that in practice it remains difficult to achieve substantial latency reduction during model execution. To address this limitation, we introduce a new computational pattern and apply SVD at a finer granularity, enabling real and measurable improvements in execution latency. Furthermore, recognizing that weight elements differ in their relative importance, we adaptively allocate relative importance to each element during SVD process to better preserve accuracy, then extend this framework with quantization applied to both weights and activations, resulting in a highly efficient VLM. Collectively, we introduce~\textit{Weighted SVD} (WSVD), which outperforms other approaches by achieving over $1.8\times$ decoding speedup while preserving accuracy. We open source our code at: \href{https://github.com/SAI-Lab-NYU/WSVD}{\texttt{https://github.com/SAI-Lab-NYU/WSVD}

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

WSVD is a reasonable incremental improvement on SVD for VLM latency but the speedup needs solid hardware evidence to be convincing.

read the letter

The main point is that WSVD applies weighted SVD at finer granularity to vision-language models and adds quantization to reach over 1.8 times faster decoding. They do well by targeting actual execution latency instead of just model size. The idea of weighting elements by importance during the SVD process is a sensible extension to keep accuracy from dropping too much. Combining it with quantization for both weights and activations shows attention to the end-to-end low-precision setup. Where it is soft is the missing details on experiments. No baselines are listed, no error bars, and nothing on whether the finer splits create extra overhead that cancels the gains. On GPUs, more small matrix multiplies often mean more kernel launches, which can slow things down once you are already in low precision. The stress-test concern about unmeasured overheads looks like it needs direct checking against their timing results. This is for engineers who compress VLMs for faster inference on edge or real-time apps. Someone who wants a new compression pattern to try would find it relevant if the numbers check out. I would recommend sending it for peer review. The core idea is testable and addresses a real deployment issue, so referees can focus on verifying the hardware measurements.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces Weighted SVD (WSVD) as a new computational pattern for low-rank approximation in Vision-Language Models. It applies SVD at finer granularity, adaptively weights elements according to their relative importance to preserve accuracy, and combines the approach with quantization of both weights and activations, claiming over 1.8× decoding speedup while maintaining accuracy.

Significance. If the speedup claim is substantiated with wall-clock measurements that survive kernel-launch and memory-access overheads, the result would be significant for practical low-precision VLM deployment. The open-sourcing of code supports reproducibility and is a positive contribution.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of over 1.8× decoding speedup is stated without any experimental details, baselines, error bars, per-layer latency breakdowns, or comparison of actual versus theoretical FLOPs, preventing assessment of whether the speedup survives the overheads of finer-granularity decomposition.
[Method] Method description (finer-granularity SVD): the paper asserts that applying SVD at finer granularity produces measurable real-world latency reductions, yet provides no analysis of the resulting increase in GEMM kernel launches and fragmented memory accesses on GPUs, which can dominate arithmetic savings once low-precision kernels are introduced.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the GitHub link is useful, but the abstract would be clearer if it briefly named the VLMs, datasets, and hardware used for the reported speedup.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our work. We address the major comments point by point in the following responses. Revisions have been made to the manuscript to provide the requested details and analysis.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of over 1.8× decoding speedup is stated without any experimental details, baselines, error bars, per-layer latency breakdowns, or comparison of actual versus theoretical FLOPs, preventing assessment of whether the speedup survives the overheads of finer-granularity decomposition.

Authors: We agree that the abstract lacks sufficient experimental context. In the revised manuscript, we have updated the abstract to include key experimental details such as the VLM models used, comparison baselines, and confirmation that the speedup is measured via wall-clock time with reported variability. Detailed per-layer latency breakdowns and actual versus theoretical FLOPs comparisons are already present in the experimental section and are now referenced in the abstract for better accessibility. revision: yes
Referee: [Method] Method description (finer-granularity SVD): the paper asserts that applying SVD at finer granularity produces measurable real-world latency reductions, yet provides no analysis of the resulting increase in GEMM kernel launches and fragmented memory accesses on GPUs, which can dominate arithmetic savings once low-precision kernels are introduced.

Authors: This is a valid point. The original manuscript emphasized empirical results but did not explicitly analyze the overheads from additional kernel launches and memory fragmentation. We have added a new analysis subsection to the Method section that quantifies these overheads using GPU profiling tools. The analysis shows that while there is an increase in launches, the finer granularity combined with our weighting scheme results in net latency reductions that survive these overheads, as validated by the wall-clock measurements. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: method introduced as empirical pattern without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe WSVD as a new computational pattern: applying SVD at finer granularity, adaptively weighting elements by importance, and combining with quantization. No equations, derivations, or fitted parameters are shown that reduce the 1.8× speedup claim to inputs by construction. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and no ansatz or renaming of known results is presented. The central claim rests on experimental outcomes rather than tautological definitions or fitted-input predictions, making the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the method description implies standard linear algebra assumptions without additional postulates.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5508 in / 1002 out tokens · 31244 ms · 2026-05-13T21:01:26.177832+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

21 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

[1]

Towards better understanding of gradient-based attribution methods for deep neural networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.06104,

Marco Ancona, Enea Ceolini, Cengiz ¨Oztireli, and Markus Gross. Towards better understanding of gradient-based attribution methods for deep neural networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.06104,

work page arXiv
[2]

Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond

Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Shusheng Yang, Shijie Wang, Sinan Tan, Peng Wang, Junyang Lin, Chang Zhou, and Jingren Zhou. Qwen-vl: A versatile vision-language model for understanding, local- ization, text reading, and beyond.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12966,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[3]

Qiguang Chen, Libo Qin, Jinhao Liu, Dengyun Peng, Jiannan Guan, Peng Wang, Mengkang Hu, Yuhang Zhou, Te Gao, and Wanxiang Che

Chi-Chih Chang, Wei-Cheng Lin, Chien-Yu Lin, Chong-Yan Chen, Yu-Fang Hu, Pei-Shuo Wang, Ning-Chi Huang, Luis Ceze, Mohamed S Abdelfattah, and Kai-Chiang Wu. Palu: Compressing kv-cache with low-rank projection.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21118,

work page arXiv
[4]

Matt Deitke, Christopher Clark, Sangho Lee, Rohun Tripathi, Yue Yang, Jae Sung Park, Moham- madreza Salehi, Niklas Muennighoff, Kyle Lo, Luca Soldaini, et al

Accessed: 2025-09-22. Matt Deitke, Christopher Clark, Sangho Lee, Rohun Tripathi, Yue Yang, Jae Sung Park, Moham- madreza Salehi, Niklas Muennighoff, Kyle Lo, Luca Soldaini, et al. Molmo and pixmo: Open weights and open data for state-of-the-art vision-language models. InProceedings of the Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pp. 91–104,

work page 2025
[5]

Vlrm: Vision-language models act as reward models for image captioning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.01911,

Maksim Dzabraev, Alexander Kunitsyn, and Andrei Ivaniuta. Vlrm: Vision-language models act as reward models for image captioning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.01911,

work page arXiv
[6]

The Llama 3 Herd of Models

12 Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2026 Aaron Grattafiori, Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhinav Jauhri, Abhinav Pandey, Abhishek Kadian, Ahmad Al-Dahle, Aiesha Letman, Akhil Mathur, Alan Schelten, Alex Vaughan, et al. The llama 3 herd of models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[7]

Language model compression with weighted low-rank factorization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.00112,

Yen-Chang Hsu, Ting Hua, Sungen Chang, Qian Lou, Yilin Shen, and Hongxia Jin. Language model compression with weighted low-rank factorization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.00112,

work page arXiv
[8]

Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments

Ian T Jolliffe and Jorge Cadima. Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philosophical transactions of the royal society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sci- ences, 374(2065):20150202,

work page 2065
[9]

Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[10]

Seed-bench: Benchmarking multimodal large language models

Bohao Li, Yuying Ge, Yixiao Ge, Guangzhi Wang, Rui Wang, Ruimao Zhang, and Ying Shan. Seed-bench: Benchmarking multimodal large language models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 13299–13308, 2024a. Chuanhao Li, Zhen Li, Chenchen Jing, Shuo Liu, Wenqi Shao, Yuwei Wu, Ping Luo, Yu Qiao, and Kaipeng Zha...

work page arXiv
[11]

Svdquant: Absorbing outliers by low-rank components for 4-bit diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.05007, 2024

Muyang Li, Yujun Lin, Zhekai Zhang, Tianle Cai, Xiuyu Li, Junxian Guo, Enze Xie, Chenlin Meng, Jun-Yan Zhu, and Song Han. Svdqunat: Absorbing outliers by low-rank components for 4-bit diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.05007, 2024c. Zhiteng Li, Mingyuan Xia, Jingyuan Zhang, Zheng Hui, Linghe Kong, Yulun Zhang, and Xiaokang Yang. Adasvd: Adaptive s...

work page arXiv
[12]

A Survey on Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models

Hanchao Liu, Wenyuan Xue, Yifei Chen, Dapeng Chen, Xiutian Zhao, Ke Wang, Liping Hou, Rongjun Li, and Wei Peng. A survey on hallucination in large vision-language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.00253, 2024a. Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, and Yong Jae Lee. Visual instruction tuning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 36:34892–34916,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[13]

Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning

Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yuheng Li, and Yong Jae Lee. Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 26296–26306, 2024b. 13 Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2026 Liyang Liu, Shilong Zhang, Zhanghui Kuang, Aojun Zhou, Jing-Hao Xue, Xinjiang Wang, Yimin Chen...

work page 2026
[14]

SmolVLM: Redefining small and efficient multimodal models

Andr´es Marafioti, Orr Zohar, Miquel Farr ´e, Merve Noyan, Elie Bakouch, Pedro Cuenca, Cyril Za- kka, Loubna Ben Allal, Anton Lozhkov, Nouamane Tazi, et al. Smolvlm: Redefining small and efficient multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.05299,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[15]

Q-vlm: Post- training quantization for large vision-language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08119, 2024a

Changyuan Wang, Ziwei Wang, Xiuwei Xu, Yansong Tang, Jie Zhou, and Jiwen Lu. Q-vlm: Post- training quantization for large vision-language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08119, 2024a. Guankun Wang, Long Bai, Wan Jun Nah, Jie Wang, Zhaoxi Zhang, Zhen Chen, Jinlin Wu, Mo- barakol Islam, Hongbin Liu, and Hongliang Ren. Surgical-lvlm: Learning to adapt large...

work page arXiv 2026
[16]

Dfrot: Achieving outlier-free and massive activation-free for rotated llms with refined rotation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.00648,

Jingyang Xiang and Sai Qian Zhang. Dfrot: Achieving outlier-free and massive activation-free for rotated llms with refined rotation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.00648,

work page arXiv
[17]

Effectively compress kv heads for llm

Hao Yu, Zelan Yang, Shen Li, Yong Li, and Jianxin Wu. Effectively compress kv heads for llm. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.07056, 2024a. Mengxia Yu, De Wang, Qi Shan, Colorado J Reed, and Alvin Wan. The super weight in large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.07191, 2024b. Zhengqing Yuan, Zhaoxu Li, Weiran Huang, Yanfang Ye, and Lichao Sun. Tinygpt-v: ...

work page arXiv
[18]

All technical ideas, analyses, and experimental results were conceived, implemented, and verified by the authors

15 Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2026 A APPENDIX A.1 THEUSE OFLLMS Large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, were used exclusively for language polishing and minor stylistic editing of the manuscript. All technical ideas, analyses, and experimental results were conceived, implemented, and verified by the authors. The authors carefully revie...

work page 2026
[19]

Table 9: Accuracy evaluation of different methods under FP16. Acc. Method ScienceQA-IMG↑ SEED-Bench↑ Avg.↑ρ1: 90%ρ1: 80%ρ1: 70%ρ1: 60% ρ1: 50% ρ1: 90%ρ1: 80%ρ1: 70%ρ1: 60% ρ1: 50% LLaV A-v1.57B ASVD 49.93%50.12%47.10%36.69% 19.19% 54.27%53.53%48.35%37.17% 24.17% 42.05%SVD-LLM65.44%63.71%61.92%57.41% 55.53% 57.89%57.50%55.33%54.64% 55.31% 58.47%QSVD-noQ67....

work page 2026
[20]

W/o per-head

As summarized in Table 12, WSVD-noQ consistently matches or outperforms all baselines across nearly all ratios on these datasets, despite being cali- brated only once on the ScienceQA training set. These results indicate that WSVD generalizes well across tasks and datasets. Moreover, WSVD’s decoding speedup is independent of the evaluation dataset: once t...

work page 2026
[21]

These results confirm that per-head SVD substantially reduces reconstruction over- head and I/O traffic, enabling efficient decoding

On RTX 4090, the speedup ranges from14.9×to18.1×, while on RTX 5090 it further increases to 17.2×–21.6×. These results confirm that per-head SVD substantially reduces reconstruction over- head and I/O traffic, enabling efficient decoding. A.8 TRAININGCOST OFWSVD WSVD first applies SVDLLM’s whitening method (Wang et al., 2024d) to per-head weight matri- ce...

work page 2026