pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.02636 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Nonlinear Magnetic Orbital Hall Effect Induced by Spin-Orbit Coupling

Hui Wang , Huiying Liu , Yanfeng Ge , Xukun Feng , Jiaojiao Zhu , Jin Cao , Cong Xiao , Shengyuan A. Yang
show 1 more author
Lay Kee Ang
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 19:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords nonlinear orbital Hall effectspin-orbit couplingantiferromagnetic orbitronicsNéel vectorBerry curvature dipoleCuMnAselectrical switching readout
0
0 comments X

The pith

A second-order nonlinear orbital Hall effect odd in the Néel vector enables electric control of both antiferromagnet readout and ferromagnet writing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a second-order nonlinear magnetic orbital Hall effect in an antiferromagnetic source layer as a way to solve two separate problems at once. Electrical detection of 180-degree switching remains difficult in compensated collinear antiferromagnets, while out-of-plane orbital torque for writing perpendicular magnetization in ferromagnets is also challenging. The proposed effect is induced by spin-orbit coupling, reverses sign with the Néel vector, and therefore lets an applied electric field control both readout and writing through the same source layer. First-principles calculations on CuMnAs show that the orbital Berry-curvature dipole produces sizable non-perturbative orbital currents. These results point toward a route for integrating spin and orbital functionalities in antiferromagnetic orbitronics.

Core claim

We propose a second-order nonlinear magnetic orbital Hall effect in the source antiferromagnet as a simultaneous recipe for both difficulties. This orbitronics effect is induced by spin-orbit coupling and is odd in the Néel vector, thus is a unique effect that integrates both functionalities via electric control of the Néel vector in the source antiferromagnet. Our first-principles calculations in CuMnAs predict significant non-perturbative orbital effects from spin-orbit coupling, with an orbital Berry-curvature dipole mechanism.

What carries the argument

The orbital Berry-curvature dipole that generates the second-order nonlinear orbital Hall current odd under Néel-vector reversal.

Load-bearing premise

The orbital Berry-curvature dipole produces sizable non-perturbative orbital effects from spin-orbit coupling in real antiferromagnets such as CuMnAs.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of a second-order orbital Hall conductivity in CuMnAs that reverses sign upon Néel-vector reversal and matches the calculated magnitude under applied electric fields.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02636 by Cong Xiao, Hui Wang, Huiying Liu, Jiaojiao Zhu, Jin Cao, Lay Kee Ang, Shengyuan A. Yang, Xukun Feng, Yanfeng Ge.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Lattice structure of AFM orthorhombic CuMnAs with N´eel vector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Angular-dependent perpendicular CPOC from non [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Schematic of the orbit-torque device for (100) contact plane between CuMnAs and a perpendicular ferromagnet. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Electrical readout of 180$^\circ$ switching in strictly compensated collinear antiferromagnets remains a major challenge in antiferromagnetic spintronics. Electrical writing of perpendicularly magnetized ferromagnets by out-of-plane orbital torque remains an important challenge in orbitronics. In this work, we propose a second-order nonlinear magnetic orbital Hall effect in the source antiferromagnet as a simultaneous recipe for both difficulties. This orbitronics effect is induced by spin-orbit coupling and is odd in the N\'eel vector, thus is a unique effect that integrates both functionalities via electric control of the N\'eel vector in the source antiferromagnet. Our first-principles calculations in CuMnAs predict significant non-perturbative orbital effects from spin-orbit coupling, with a orbital Berry-curvature dipole mechanism. These findings unveil new possibilities opened by topological antiferromagnetic orbitronics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a second-order nonlinear magnetic orbital Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets such as CuMnAs. This effect is induced by spin-orbit coupling, is odd under Néel-vector reversal, and is attributed to an orbital Berry-curvature dipole mechanism. First-principles calculations are invoked to demonstrate significant non-perturbative orbital Hall currents that could simultaneously enable electrical readout of 180° antiferromagnetic switching and out-of-plane orbital torque writing of ferromagnets.

Significance. If the central claim is substantiated, the work would integrate antiferromagnetic spintronics and orbitronics by providing an electrically controllable, Néel-vector-odd orbital response. The grounding in established Berry-curvature concepts from prior literature is a strength, as is the use of first-principles calculations on a real material (CuMnAs) rather than a model Hamiltonian.

major comments (2)
  1. [First-principles results section] First-principles results section: the claim of 'significant non-perturbative orbital effects from spin-orbit coupling' via the orbital Berry-curvature dipole is load-bearing for the central proposal, yet no explicit scaling test with SOC strength is reported. The manuscript must demonstrate that the second-order orbital Hall conductivity vanishes in the perturbative (linear-in-SOC) limit and scales quadratically or higher when SOC is artificially scaled, to exclude numerical artifacts from the antiferromagnetic supercell or incomplete SOC treatment.
  2. [Abstract and mechanism discussion] Abstract and mechanism discussion: quantitative values for the orbital Hall conductivity, error bars, k-point convergence, and SOC scaling are absent. Without these, the assertion that the effect is 'non-perturbative' and 'significant' cannot be assessed against the perturbative limit where the dipole contribution should vanish.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from at least one numerical value (e.g., orbital Hall conductivity magnitude) to allow readers to gauge the effect size immediately.
  2. [Mechanism discussion] Notation for the orbital Berry-curvature dipole should be defined explicitly with an equation reference when first introduced, to distinguish it clearly from the linear orbital Hall effect.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which help strengthen the presentation of our first-principles results. We address each major point below and will incorporate the requested analyses and quantitative data into the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [First-principles results section] First-principles results section: the claim of 'significant non-perturbative orbital effects from spin-orbit coupling' via the orbital Berry-curvature dipole is load-bearing for the central proposal, yet no explicit scaling test with SOC strength is reported. The manuscript must demonstrate that the second-order orbital Hall conductivity vanishes in the perturbative (linear-in-SOC) limit and scales quadratically or higher when SOC is artificially scaled, to exclude numerical artifacts from the antiferromagnetic supercell or incomplete SOC treatment.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit SOC scaling test is necessary to confirm the non-perturbative origin and to exclude possible numerical artifacts. In the revised manuscript we will add calculations in which the SOC strength is artificially scaled from zero to its full value. These will demonstrate that the second-order orbital Hall conductivity vanishes in the linear-in-SOC limit and exhibits quadratic (or higher) scaling at full SOC strength, consistent with the orbital Berry-curvature dipole mechanism. The new data and accompanying discussion will be placed in the first-principles results section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract and mechanism discussion] Abstract and mechanism discussion: quantitative values for the orbital Hall conductivity, error bars, k-point convergence, and SOC scaling are absent. Without these, the assertion that the effect is 'non-perturbative' and 'significant' cannot be assessed against the perturbative limit where the dipole contribution should vanish.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript lacks the requested quantitative details. The revised version will report the absolute values of the orbital Hall conductivity (in appropriate units), include statistical error bars obtained from k-point sampling, document k-point convergence tests, and present the SOC scaling results described above. These additions will enable direct comparison with the perturbative limit and will be referenced both in the abstract and in the mechanism discussion. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives the nonlinear magnetic orbital Hall effect from standard spin-orbit coupling and orbital Berry-curvature dipole concepts, with the central results obtained via independent first-principles calculations on CuMnAs. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the odd-in-Néel-vector property and non-perturbative scaling emerge from the explicit computations rather than being presupposed. This is a standard, self-contained theoretical proposal with external numerical support.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard spin-orbit coupling and Berry-curvature concepts already established in the literature; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spin-orbit coupling generates orbital Berry curvature in antiferromagnetic materials
    Invoked to explain the orbital Hall effect mechanism

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5467 in / 1218 out tokens · 43564 ms · 2026-05-13T19:13:13.674985+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Orbi- tronics: The intrinsic orbital current in p-doped silicon, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 066601 (2005)

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    G. Y. Guo, Y. Yao, and Q. Niu, Ab initio calculation of the intrinsic spin hall effect in semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 226601 (2005)

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    Kontani, T

    H. Kontani, T. Tanaka, D. Hirashima, K. Yamada, and J. Inoue, Giant orbital hall effect in transition metals: Origin of large spin and anomalous hall effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 016601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    D. Go, D. Jo, C. Kim, and H.-W. Lee, Intrinsic spin and orbital hall effects from orbital texture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086602 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Bhowal and S

    S. Bhowal and S. Satpathy, Intrinsic orbital moment and prediction of a large orbital hall effect in two- dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B101, 121112 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Sala and P

    G. Sala and P. Gambardella, Giant orbital hall effect and orbital-to-spin conversion in 3 d, 5 d, and 4 f metallic heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033037 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Salemi and P

    L. Salemi and P. M. Oppeneer, First-principles theory of intrinsic spin and orbital hall and nernst effects in metal- lic monoatomic crystals, Phys. Rev. Mater.6, 095001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    A. Pezo, D. Garc´ ıa Ovalle, and A. Manchon, Orbital hall effect in crystals: Interatomic versus intra-atomic contri- butions, Phys. Rev. B106, 104414 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Costa, B

    M. Costa, B. Focassio, L. M. Canonico, T. P. Cysne, G. R. Schleder, R. B. Muniz, A. Fazzio, and T. G. Rappoport, Connecting higher-order topology with the orbital hall effect in monolayers of transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 116204 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    G¨ obel and I

    B. G¨ obel and I. Mertig, Orbital hall effect accompanying quantum hall effect: Landau levels cause orbital polar- ized edge currents, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 146301 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    G¨ obel, L

    B. G¨ obel, L. Schimpf, and I. Mertig, Topological orbital hall effect caused by skyrmions and antiferromagnetic skyrmions, Commun. Phys.8, 17 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    D. Jo, D. Go, and H.-W. Lee, Gigantic intrinsic orbital hall effects in weakly spin-orbit coupled metals, Phys. Rev. B98, 214405 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Y.-G. Choi, D. Jo, K.-H. Ko, D. Go, K.-H. Kim, H. G. Park, C. Kim, B.-C. Min, G.-M. Choi, and H.-W. Lee, Observation of the orbital hall effect in a light metal ti, Nature619, 52 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Lyalin, S

    I. Lyalin, S. Alikhah, M. Berritta, P. M. Oppeneer, and R. K. Kawakami, Magneto-optical detection of the orbital hall effect in chromium, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 156702 6 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Ding, M.-G

    S. Ding, M.-G. Kang, W. Legrand, and P. Gambardella, Orbital torque in rare-earth transition-metal ferrimag- nets, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 236702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Y. Yang, P. Wang, J. Chen, D. Zhang, C. Pan, S. Hu, T. Wang, W. Yue, C. Chen, W. Jiang,et al., Orbital torque switching in perpendicularly magnetized materi- als, Nat. Commun.15, 8645 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Gupta, C

    R. Gupta, C. Bouard, F. Kammerbauer, J. O. Ledesma- Martin, A. Bose, I. Kononenko, S. Martin, P. Us´ e, G. Jakob, M. Drouard,et al., Harnessing orbital hall ef- fect in spin-orbit torque mram, Nat. Commun.16, 130 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Zhang, H

    D. Zhang, H. Wei, J. Duan, J. Chen, J. Chen, D. Yue, W. Gong, P. Liu, Y. Yang, J. Gou,et al., Orbital torque switching of room temperature two-dimensional van der waals ferromagnet fe3gate2, Nat. Commun.16, 7047 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Salemi and P

    L. Salemi and P. M. Oppeneer, Theory of magnetic spin and orbital hall and nernst effects in bulk ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B106, 024410 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Manchon, J

    A. Manchon, J. ˇZelezn´ y, I. M. Miron, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 035004 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    J. Ryu, S. Lee, K.-J. Lee, and B.-G. Park, Current- induced spin–orbit torques for spintronic applications, Adv. Mater.32, 1907148 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    I. M. Miron, K. Garello, G. Gaudin, P.-J. Zermatten, M. V. Costache, S. Auffret, S. Bandiera, B. Rodmacq, A. Schuhl, and P. Gambardella, Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in-plane cur- rent injection, Nature476, 189 (2011)

    work page 2011

  23. [23]

    L. Liu, O. J. Lee, T. J. Gudmundsen, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, Current-induced switching of perpendic- ularly magnetized magnetic layers using spin torque from the spin hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 096602 (2012)

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    Yang and Y

    H. Yang and Y. Liu, Field-free and unconventional switching of perpendicular magnetization at room tem- perature, Nat. Electron.6, 724 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    X. Feng, L. K. Ang, S. A. Yang, C. Xiao, and X. Xie, Gi- ant out-of-plane magnetic orbital torque of altermagnets from spin-group symmetry breaking, arXiv:2602.19076

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  26. [26]

    Godinho, H

    J. Godinho, H. Reichlov´ a, D. Kriegner, V. Nov´ ak, K. Olejn´ ık, Z. Kaˇ spar, Z.ˇSob´ aˇ n, P. Wadley, R. P. Cam- pion, R. M. Otxoa, P. E. Roy, J. ˇZelezn´ y, T. Jungwirth, and J. Wunderlich, Electrically induced and detected n´ eel vector reversal in a collinear antiferromagnet, Nat. Com- mun.9, 4686 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    C. Wang, Y. Gao, and D. Xiao, Intrinsic Nonlinear Hall Effect in Antiferromagnetic Tetragonal CuMnAs, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 277201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    H. Liu, J. Zhao, Y.-X. Huang, W. Wu, X.-L. Sheng, C. Xiao, and S. A. Yang, Intrinsic Second-Order Anoma- lous Hall Effect and Its Application in Compensated An- tiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 277202 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    See Supplemental Material for details of symmetry anal- ysis and computations

    work page

  30. [30]

    H. Wang, X. Feng, J. Cao, H. Liu, W. Gao, C. Xiao, S. A. Yang, and L. K. Ang, Out-of-plane nonlinear orbital hall torque (2025), arXiv:2511.10314 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum nonlinear hall effect induced by berry curvature dipole in time-reversal in- variant materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 216806 (2015)

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Ma, S.-Y

    Q. Ma, S.-Y. Xu, H. Shen, D. MacNeill, V. Fatemi, T.- R. Chang, A. M. Mier Valdivia, S. Wu, Z. Du, C.-H. Hsu, S. Fang, Q. D. Gibson, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. J. Cava, E. Kaxiras, H.-Z. Lu, H. Lin, L. Fu, N. Gedik, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Observation of the nonlinear hall effect under time-reversal-symmetric conditions, Nature 565, 337 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    K. Kang, T. Li, E. Sohn, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Nonlin- ear anomalous hall effect in few-layer wte2, Nat. Mater. 18, 324 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Z. Du, C. Wang, S. Li, H.-Z. Lu, and X. Xie, Disorder- induced nonlinear hall effect with time-reversal symme- try, Nat. Commun.10, 3047 (2019)

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    C. Xiao, Z. Z. Du, and Q. Niu, Theory of nonlinear hall ef- fects: Modified semiclassics from quantum kinetics, Phys. Rev. B100, 165422 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Z. Z. Du, H.-Z. Lu, and X. Xie, Nonlinear hall effects, Nat. Rev. Phys.3, 744 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Chang and Q

    M.-C. Chang and Q. Niu, Berry Phase, Hyperorbits, and the Hofstadter Spectrum, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 1348 (1995)

    work page 1995

  38. [38]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

    work page 1959

  39. [39]

    Sinova, S

    J. Sinova, S. O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C. H. Back, and T. Jungwirth, Spin hall effects, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 1213 (2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    S. Sun, Z. Song, H. Weng, and X. Dai, Topological metals induced by the zeeman effect, Phys. Rev. B101, 125118 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Souza, Multipole theory of op- tical spatial dispersion in crystals, SciPost Phys.14, 118 (2023)

    ´Oscar Pozo Oca˜ na and I. Souza, Multipole theory of op- tical spatial dispersion in crystals, SciPost Phys.14, 118 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Hayami, M

    S. Hayami, M. Yatsushiro, and H. Kusunose, Nonlinear spin hall effect inPT-symmetric collinear magnets, Phys. Rev. B106, 024405 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    M´ aca, J

    F. M´ aca, J. Maˇ sek, O. Stelmakhovych, X. Mart´ ı, H. Re- ichlov´ a, K. Uhl´ ıˇ rov´ a, P. Beran, P. Wadley, V. Nov´ ak, and T. Jungwirth, Room-temperature antiferromagnetism in cumnas, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.324, 1606 (2012)

    work page 2012

  44. [44]

    Emmanouilidou, H

    E. Emmanouilidou, H. Cao, P. Tang, X. Gui, C. Hu, B. Shen, J. Wu, S.-C. Zhang, W. Xie, and N. Ni, Mag- netic order induces symmetry breaking in the single- crystalline orthorhombic cumnas semimetal, Phys. Rev. B96, 224405 (2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Zhang, S

    X. Zhang, S. Sun, and H. Lei, Massive fermions with low mobility in antiferromagnet orthorhombic cumnas single crystals, Phys. Rev. B96, 235105 (2017)

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    J. Cao, W. Jiang, X.-P. Li, D. Tu, J. Zhou, J. Zhou, and Y. Yao, In-plane anomalous hall effect inPT- symmetric antiferromagnetic materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 166702 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    P. Tang, Q. Zhou, G. Xu, and S.-C. Zhang, Dirac fermions in an antiferromagnetic semimetal, Nat. Phys. 12, 1100 (2016)

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. ˇZelezn´ y, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Elec- tric control of dirac quasiparticles by spin-orbit torque in an antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 106402 (2017)

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    V. T. N. Huyen, Y. Yanagi, and M.-T. Suzuki, Spin and anomalous hall effects emerging from topological degen- eracy in the dirac fermion system cumnas, Phys. Rev. B 104, 035110 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Onoda, N

    S. Onoda, N. Sugimoto, and N. Nagaosa, Quantum trans- 7 port theory of anomalous electric, thermoelectric, and thermal hall effects in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B77, 165103 (2008)

    work page 2008

  51. [51]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1539 (2010)

    work page 2010

  52. [52]

    L. Ye, M. Kang, J. Liu, F. Von Cube, C. R. Wicker, T. Suzuki, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, D. C. Bell,et al., Massive dirac fermions in a ferromagnetic kagome metal, Nature555, 638 (2018)

    work page 2018

  53. [53]

    K. Kim, J. Seo, E. Lee, K.-T. Ko, B. Kim, B. G. Jang, J. M. Ok, J. Lee, Y. J. Jo, W. Kang,et al., Large anoma- lous hall current induced by topological nodal lines in a ferromagnetic van der waals semimetal, Nat. Mater.17, 794 (2018)

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    E. Liu, Y. Sun, N. Kumar, L. Muechler, A. Sun, L. Jiao, S.-Y. Yang, D. Liu, A. Liang, Q. Xu,et al., Giant anomalous hall effect in a ferromagnetic kagome-lattice semimetal, Nat. Phys.14, 1125 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Sakai, Y

    A. Sakai, Y. P. Mizuta, A. A. Nugroho, R. Sihomb- ing, T. Koretsune, M.-T. Suzuki, N. Takemori, R. Ishii, D. Nishio-Hamane, R. Arita,et al., Giant anomalous nernst effect and quantum-critical scaling in a ferromag- netic semimetal, Nat. Phys.14, 1119 (2018)

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    S. N. Guin, P. Vir, Y. Zhang, N. Kumar, S. J. Watzman, C. Fu, E. Liu, K. Manna, W. Schnelle, J. Gooth,et al., Zero-field nernst effect in a ferro- magnetic kagome-lattice weyl-semimetal co3sn2s2, Adv. Mater.31, 1806622 (2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    Sakai, S

    A. Sakai, S. Minami, T. Koretsune, T. Chen, T. Higo, Y. Wang, T. Nomoto, M. Hirayama, S. Miwa, D. Nishio- Hamane,et al., Iron-based binary ferromagnets for trans- verse thermoelectric conversion, Nature581, 53 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    D.-F. Shao, G. Gurung, S.-H. Zhang, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Dirac nodal line metal for topological antiferromagnetic spintronics, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 077203 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    X. Fan, H. Celik, J. Wu, C. Ni, K.-J. Lee, V. O. Lorenz, and J. Q. Xiao, Quantifying interface and bulk contri- butions to spin–orbit torque in magnetic bilayers, Nat. Commun.5, 3042 (2014)

    work page 2014

  60. [60]

    Montazeri, P

    M. Montazeri, P. Upadhyaya, M. C. Onbasli, G. Yu, K. L. Wong, M. Lang, Y. Fan, X. Li, P. Khalili Amiri, R. N. Schwartz,et al., Magneto-optical investigation of spin– orbit torques in metallic and insulating magnetic het- erostructures, Nat. Commun.6, 8958 (2015)

    work page 2015

  61. [61]

    D. Lee, D. Go, H.-J. Park, W. Jeong, H.-W. Ko, D. Yun, D. Jo, S. Lee, G. Go, J. H. Oh,et al., Orbital torque in magnetic bilayers, Nat. Commun.12, 6710 (2021)

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    MacNeill, G

    D. MacNeill, G. Stiehl, M. Guimaraes, R. Buhrman, J. Park, and D. Ralph, Control of spin–orbit torques through crystal symmetry in wte2/ferromagnet bilayers, Nat. Phys.13, 300 (2017)

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    Y. Liu, G. Shi, D. Kumar, T. Kim, S. Shi, D. Yang, J. Zhang, C. Zhang, F. Wang, S. Yang,et al., Field- free switching of perpendicular magnetization at room temperature using out-of-plane spins from tairte4, Nat. Electron.6, 732 (2023)

    work page 2023