pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.19076 · v2 · pith:IXETAGRTnew · submitted 2026-02-22 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall

Nonperturbative Magnetic Orbital Hall Effect in Altermagnets

Xukun Feng , Jin Cao , Lay Kee Ang , Shengyuan A. Yang , Cong Xiao , X. C. Xie This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 11:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords altermagnetsorbital Hall effectspin-orbit couplingmagnetic materialssymmetry analysisfirst-principles calculationsmagnetization switchingroom-temperature effects
0
0 comments X

The pith

Altermagnets support a giant magnetic orbital Hall effect that is nonperturbative in spin-orbit coupling and forbidden in conventional antiferromagnets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that altermagnets generate a magnetic orbital Hall effect induced by spin-orbit coupling yet independent of its perturbative strength. Symmetry analysis shows this effect is strictly forbidden in standard collinear antiferromagnets but permitted across all ten spin-Laue classes of collinear altermagnets. The resulting orbital currents reach giant magnitudes comparable to or larger than nonrelativistic spin Hall effects and include unconventional collinear polarization. First-principles calculations on CrSb and FeSb2 predict strong room-temperature signals that enable field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization.

Core claim

We uncover the magnetic orbital Hall effect, which is nonperturbative in SOC strength. We establish the symmetry properties of this effect, demonstrating that it is strictly forbidden in conventional collinear antiferromagnets yet universally allowed in all ten spin-Laue classes of collinear altermagnets. Counterintuitively, although SOC-induced, it reaches giant magnitudes in altermagnets comparable to or even exceeding the nonrelativistic spin Hall effect. Moreover, altermagnetic symmetry enables unconventional collinear-polarized orbital currents, allowing field-free manipulation of perpendicular magnetization. Our first-principles calculations predict strong room-temperature responses in

What carries the argument

The magnetic orbital Hall effect, the generation of orbital current perpendicular to an applied electric field under collinear magnetic order, classified according to spin-Laue symmetry groups that distinguish altermagnets from conventional antiferromagnets.

Load-bearing premise

The symmetry analysis correctly classifies the magnetic orbital Hall effect as strictly forbidden in conventional collinear antiferromagnets yet allowed in all ten spin-Laue classes of collinear altermagnets, with first-principles calculations accurately capturing the giant nonperturbative magnitudes in CrSb and FeSb2.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of a large, collinear-polarized orbital Hall conductivity in CrSb or FeSb2 that remains finite and giant even when spin-orbit coupling is artificially suppressed in calculations, or its complete absence in a conventional collinear antiferromagnet like MnTe.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.19076 by Cong Xiao, Jin Cao, Lay Kee Ang, Shengyuan A. Yang, X. C. Xie, Xukun Feng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. SOC dependence of magnetic orbital and spin trans [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. CPOC and CPSC induced by SOC in CrSb. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. SOC induced CPOC competing with non-relativistic CPSC in FeSb [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent studies on altermagnets have focused considerable attention on nonrelativistic effects that persist in the absence of spin-orbit coupling (SOC). As a result, the relative importance of various phenomena in altermagnets has commonly been judged by their dependence on SOC. Here, we challenge this common wisdom by uncovering the magnetic orbital Hall effect, which is nonperturbative in SOC strength. We establish the symmetry properties of this effect, demonstrating that it is strictly forbidden in conventional collinear antiferromagnets yet universally allowed in all ten spin-Laue classes of collinear altermagnets. Counterintuitively, although SOC-induced, it reaches giant magnitudes in altermagnets-comparable to or even exceeding the nonrelativistic spin Hall effect. Moreover, altermagnetic symmetry enables unconventional collinear-polarized orbital currents, allowing field-free manipulation of perpendicular magnetization. Our first-principles calculations predict strong room-temperature responses in the experimentally established altermagnets CrSb and FeSb2. These findings reveal the previously overlooked potential of altermagnetic orbitronics and broaden the horizons for altermagnets in high-performance magnetic memory applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to identify a magnetic orbital Hall effect (MOHE) that is nonperturbative in spin-orbit coupling (SOC) strength. Symmetry arguments establish that the effect is strictly forbidden in conventional collinear antiferromagnets but allowed in all ten spin-Laue classes of collinear altermagnets. First-principles calculations predict giant MOHE magnitudes in CrSb and FeSb2 that are comparable to or exceed the nonrelativistic spin Hall effect, with altermagnetic symmetry enabling collinear-polarized orbital currents that permit field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization.

Significance. If the symmetry classification and computational predictions hold, the work identifies a previously overlooked SOC-induced but giant orbital response that is symmetry-protected in altermagnets. This could broaden altermagnet applications in orbitronics and magnetic memory by enabling field-free manipulation of magnetization via unconventional orbital currents, complementing existing nonrelativistic spin effects.

major comments (2)
  1. [Symmetry analysis] Symmetry section: The central distinction—that the orbital Hall conductivity tensor (collinear polarization) is identically zero under conventional collinear AFM symmetries yet nonzero in every one of the ten altermagnetic spin-Laue classes—requires explicit tensor verification. Please tabulate the allowed components of the orbital current operator under the combined spin and lattice operations for at least one representative conventional AFM (e.g., MnTe or similar) and one altermagnet from each distinct class to confirm the strict forbiddance and universal allowance.
  2. [Computational results] First-principles calculations section: The reported giant, nonperturbative magnitudes in CrSb and FeSb2 are load-bearing for the claim of practical relevance. The manuscript should include a quantitative demonstration that the MOHE conductivity remains large when SOC is artificially scaled down (e.g., by factors of 0.1–1.0) and report convergence with respect to k-point sampling, basis-set size, and exchange-correlation functional to substantiate that the effect is not an artifact of the computational setup.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the direction of the applied electric field, the polarization of the orbital current, and the units of the conductivity tensor components.
  2. [Abstract and main text] The abstract states that the effect 'reaches giant magnitudes... comparable to or even exceeding the nonrelativistic spin Hall effect.' A direct numerical comparison (same units, same materials) should be added in the main text for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments have prompted us to strengthen the symmetry analysis and computational validation. We address each major point below and have incorporated the requested additions into the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Symmetry analysis] Symmetry section: The central distinction—that the orbital Hall conductivity tensor (collinear polarization) is identically zero under conventional collinear AFM symmetries yet nonzero in every one of the ten altermagnetic spin-Laue classes—requires explicit tensor verification. Please tabulate the allowed components of the orbital current operator under the combined spin and lattice operations for at least one representative conventional AFM (e.g., MnTe or similar) and one altermagnet from each distinct class to confirm the strict forbiddance and universal allowance.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit tabulation provides stronger support for the symmetry claims. In the revised manuscript we have added Table I, which lists the symmetry-allowed components of the orbital Hall conductivity tensor (focusing on collinear polarization) for MnTe as a representative conventional collinear antiferromagnet and for representative members of each of the ten spin-Laue classes of collinear altermagnets. The table confirms that the relevant tensor elements are identically zero under conventional AFM symmetries while being permitted in all altermagnetic classes, consistent with the symmetry arguments already presented in the text. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Computational results] First-principles calculations section: The reported giant, nonperturbative magnitudes in CrSb and FeSb2 are load-bearing for the claim of practical relevance. The manuscript should include a quantitative demonstration that the MOHE conductivity remains large when SOC is artificially scaled down (e.g., by factors of 0.1–1.0) and report convergence with respect to k-point sampling, basis-set size, and exchange-correlation functional to substantiate that the effect is not an artifact of the computational setup.

    Authors: We appreciate this request for additional validation. We have performed new calculations in which the SOC strength is scaled by factors of 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 while keeping all other parameters fixed. The MOHE conductivity in both CrSb and FeSb2 remains essentially unchanged down to 10% SOC, directly confirming its nonperturbative character. We have also added explicit convergence data for k-point meshes (up to 24×24×24), basis-set size, and two exchange-correlation functionals (PBE and LDA) in the revised Supplementary Information, with a brief discussion in the main text. These tests show that the reported magnitudes are robust. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: symmetry classification and first-principles predictions are independent

full rationale

The paper establishes the magnetic orbital Hall effect via symmetry analysis showing it is forbidden in conventional collinear antiferromagnets but allowed in all ten spin-Laue classes of altermagnets, then computes giant magnitudes nonperturbatively in SOC using first-principles methods for CrSb and FeSb2. These steps rely on explicit tensor transformations under combined spin-lattice symmetries and DFT calculations, without reducing to fitted parameters from the target data, self-definitional equations, or load-bearing self-citations. The derivation chain is self-contained and externally verifiable through symmetry groups and computational benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on symmetry classification of altermagnets and first-principles electronic structure calculations for specific compounds.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Symmetry properties of the ten spin-Laue classes of collinear altermagnets universally permit the magnetic orbital Hall effect while forbidding it in conventional collinear antiferromagnets.
    Invoked via group theory analysis of magnetic point groups as stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5748 in / 1477 out tokens · 72820 ms · 2026-05-22T11:51:50.400455+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Nonlinear Magnetic Orbital Hall Effect Induced by Spin-Orbit Coupling

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    A nonlinear orbital Hall effect odd in the Néel vector unifies electrical readout of antiferromagnetic switching with orbital torque writing to ferromagnets via spin-orbit coupling.

  2. Orbital-Splitter Current in Altermagnets

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Altermagnets host a purely intrinsic orbital-splitter current that is strongly anisotropic, exceeds the spin-splitter current by up to a factor of four in some directions, and generates damping-like torque to speed up...

  3. Third-order intrinsic anomalous Hall effect as a transport fingerprint of altermagnets

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Altermagnets exhibit a resonant third-order intrinsic anomalous Hall effect from the Berry curvature quadrupole, serving as a quantum geometric transport fingerprint.

  4. Termination-Preserved Ultra-high Tunneling Magnetoresistance in Altermagnetic KV2Se2O

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    K-terminated KV2Se2O altermagnetic tunnel junctions achieve TMR up to 10^12% by preserving bulk spin polarization through interfacial passivation and nodal-point spin channels.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    2D ATM model To verify the above analysis, we perform numerical calcu- lations in a 2D minimal lattice model exhibitingd-wave altermagnetism [53, 54]

    =−   1 0 0 0−1 0 0 0−1   or−   −1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0−1   (15) 8 In this symmetry setting, second-order spin-flip correc- tion toσ S⊥ is prohibited, while the first-order correction from spin-flip SOC is allowed. 2D ATM model To verify the above analysis, we perform numerical calcu- lations in a 2D minimal lattice model exhibitingd-wave altermagnetism [...

    work page

  2. [2]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    C. Wu, K. Sun, E. Fradkin, and S.-C. Zhang, Fermi liquid instabilities in the spin channel, Phys. Rev. B75, 115103 (2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Mo- tome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in organic an- tiferromagnets, Nat. Commun.10, 4305 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum- dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, j. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88, 123702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv.6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-zantiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Shao, S.-H

    D.-F. Shao, S.-H. Zhang, M. Li, C.-B. Eom, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Spin-neutral currents for spintronics, Nat. Commun.12, 7061 (2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nat. Commun.12, 2846 (2021)

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-group symmetry in magnetic materials with negligible spin- orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. X12, 021016 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin space groups: Full classification and applications, Phys. Rev. X14, 031037 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Jiang, Z

    Y. Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of spin-space groups: Toward a complete description of symmetries of magnetic orders, Phys. Rev. X14, 031039 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    H. Zhu, J. Li, X. Chen, Y. Yu, and Q. Liu, Magnetic ge- ometry induced quantum geometry and nonlinear trans- ports, Nat. Commun.16, 4882 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K. V´ yborn´ y, Y. Ya- hagi, J. Sinova, T. c. v. Jungwirth, and J. ˇZelezn´ y, Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativis- tic collinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 127701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and tunneling mag- netoresistance in unconventional collinear antiferromag- nets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling, Phys. Rev. X12, 011028 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Shao, Y.-Y

    D.-F. Shao, Y.-Y. Jiang, J. Ding, S.-H. Zhang, Z.-A. Wang, R.-C. Xiao, G. Gurung, W. J. Lu, Y. P. Sun, and 9 E. Y. Tsymbal, N´ eel spin currents in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 216702 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring new frontiers in mag- netism and spintronics, Adv. Funct. Mater.34, 2409327 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Zhang, C

    R.-W. Zhang, C. Cui, R. Li, J. Duan, L. Li, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Predictable gate-field control of spin in alter- magnets with spin-layer coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 056401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials, Nat. Rev. Mater.10, 473 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    J. Lai, T. Yu, P. Liu, L. Liu, G. Xing, X.-Q. Chen, and Y. Sun,d-wave flat fermi surface in altermagnets enables maximum charge-to-spin conversion, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 256702 (2025)

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    A. Bose, N. J. Schreiber, R. Jain, D.-F. Shao, H. P. Nair, J. Sun, X. S. Zhang, D. A. Muller, E. Y. Tsym- bal, D. G. Schlom,et al., Tilted spin current generated by the collinear antiferromagnet ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron.5, 267 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Observation of spin-splitter torque in collinear antiferromagnetic ruo 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 137201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    H. Bai, Y. C. Zhang, Y. J. Zhou, P. Chen, C. H. Wan, L. Han, W. X. Zhu, S. X. Liang, Y. C. Su, X. F. Han, F. Pan, and C. Song, Efficient spin-to-charge conversion via altermagnetic spin splitting effect in antiferromagnet ruo2, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 216701 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    D. Lee, D. Go, H.-J. Park, W. Jeong, H.-W. Ko, D. Yun, D. Jo, S. Lee, G. Go, J. H. Oh,et al., Orbital torque in magnetic bilayers, Nat. Commun.12, 6710 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Y.-G. Choi, D. Jo, K.-H. Ko, D. Go, K.-H. Kim, H. G. Park, C. Kim, B.-C. Min, G.-M. Choi, and H.-W. Lee, Observation of the orbital hall effect in a light metal ti, Nature619, 52 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Ding, M.-G

    S. Ding, M.-G. Kang, W. Legrand, and P. Gambardella, Orbital torque in rare-earth transition-metal ferrimag- nets, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 236702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Z. C. Zheng, Q. X. Guo, D. Jo, D. Go, L. H. Wang, H. C. Chen, W. Yin, X. M. Wang, G. H. Yu, W. He, H.-W. Lee, J. Teng, and T. Zhu, Magnetization switching driven by current-induced torque from weakly spin-orbit coupled zr, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013127 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Go and H.-W

    D. Go and H.-W. Lee, Orbital torque: Torque generation by orbital current injection, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013177 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    S. Ding, A. Ross, D. Go, L. Baldrati, Z. Ren, F. Freimuth, S. Becker, F. Kammerbauer, J. Yang, G. Jakob, Y. Mokrousov, and M. Kl¨ aui, Harnessing orbital-to-spin conversion of interfacial orbital currents for efficient spin- orbit torques, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 177201 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    J. Kim, D. Go, H. Tsai, D. Jo, K. Kondou, H.-W. Lee, and Y. Otani, Nontrivial torque generation by orbital angular momentum injection in ferromagnetic- metal/Cu/al2o3 trilayers, Phys. Rev. B103, L020407 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Lee, M.-G

    S. Lee, M.-G. Kang, D. Go, D. Kim, J.-H. Kang, T. Lee, G.-H. Lee, J. Kang, N. J. Lee, Y. Mokrousov,et al., Efficient conversion of orbital hall current to spin current for spin-orbit torque switching, Commun. Phys.4, 234 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Zheng, T

    Z. Zheng, T. Zeng, T. Zhao, S. Shi, L. Ren, T. Zhang, L. Jia, Y. Gu, R. Xiao, H. Zhou,et al., Effective electrical manipulation of a topological antiferromagnet by orbital torques, Nat. Commun.15, 745 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Y. Yang, P. Wang, J. Chen, D. Zhang, C. Pan, S. Hu, T. Wang, W. Yue, C. Chen, W. Jiang,et al., Orbital torque switching in perpendicularly magnetized materi- als, Nat. Commun.15, 8645 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Gupta, C

    R. Gupta, C. Bouard, F. Kammerbauer, J. O. Ledesma- Martin, A. Bose, I. Kononenko, S. Martin, P. Us´ e, G. Jakob, M. Drouard,et al., Harnessing orbital hall ef- fect in spin-orbit torque mram, Nat. Commun.16, 130 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Zhang, H

    D. Zhang, H. Wei, J. Duan, J. Chen, J. Chen, D. Yue, W. Gong, P. Liu, Y. Yang, J. Gou,et al., Orbital torque switching of room temperature two-dimensional van der waals ferromagnet fe3gate2, Nat. Commun.16, 7047 (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    D. Go, D. Jo, C. Kim, and H.-W. Lee, Intrinsic spin and orbital hall effects from orbital texture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086602 (2018)

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    D. Jo, D. Go, and H.-W. Lee, Gigantic intrinsic orbital hall effects in weakly spin-orbit coupled metals, Phys. Rev. B98, 214405 (2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    A. Pezo, D. Garc´ ıa Ovalle, and A. Manchon, Orbital hall effect in crystals: Interatomic versus intra-atomic contri- butions, Phys. Rev. B106, 104414 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Lyalin, S

    I. Lyalin, S. Alikhah, M. Berritta, P. M. Oppeneer, and R. K. Kawakami, Magneto-optical detection of the orbital hall effect in chromium, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 156702 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Kurebayashi, Going in the right direction, Nat

    H. Kurebayashi, Going in the right direction, Nat. Phys. 13, 209 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Manchon, J

    A. Manchon, J. ˇZelezn´ y, I. M. Miron, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 035004 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    J. Ryu, S. Lee, K.-J. Lee, and B.-G. Park, Current- induced spin–orbit torques for spintronic applications, Adv. Mater.32, 1907148 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Yang and Y

    H. Yang and Y. Liu, Field-free and unconventional switching of perpendicular magnetization at room tem- perature, Nat. Electron.6, 724 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Y. Liu, G. Shi, D. Kumar, T. Kim, S. Shi, D. Yang, J. Zhang, C. Zhang, F. Wang, S. Yang,et al., Field- free switching of perpendicular magnetization at room temperature using out-of-plane spins from tairte4, Nat. Electron.6, 732 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Zhang, H

    Y. Zhang, H. Xu, K. Jia, G. Lan, Z. Huang, B. He, C. He, Q. Shao, Y. Wang, M. Zhao,et al., Room temper- ature field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization through spin-orbit torque originating from low-symmetry type ii weyl semimetal, Sci. Adv.9, eadg9819 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Bainsla, B

    L. Bainsla, B. Zhao, N. Behera, A. M. Hoque, L. Sj¨ ostr¨ om, A. Martinelli, M. Abdel-Hafiez, J.˚Akerman, and S. P. Dash, Large out-of-plane spin–orbit torque in topological weyl semimetal tairte4, Nat. Commun.15, 4649 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    F. Wang, G. Shi, K.-W. Kim, H.-J. Park, J. G. Jang, H. R. Tan, M. Lin, Y. Liu, T. Kim, D. Yang,et al., Field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization by two-dimensional ptte2/wte2 van der waals heterostruc- 10 tures with high spin hall conductivity, Nat. Mater.23, 768 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Abdelwahab, D

    I. Abdelwahab, D. Kumar, T. Bian, H. Zheng, H. Gao, F. Hu, A. McClelland, K. Leng, W. L. Wilson, J. Yin, et al., Two-dimensional chiral perovskites with large spin hall angle and collinear spin hall conductivity, Science 385, 311 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Z. Liu, M. Wei, W. Peng, D. Hou, Y. Gao, and Q. Niu, Multipolar anisotropy in anomalous hall effect from spin- group symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. X15, 031006 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Zhang, F

    H. Zhang, F. Freimuth, S. Blugel, Y. Mokrousov, and I. Souza, Role of spin-flip transitions in the anomalous hall effect of fept alloy, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 117202 (2011)

    work page 2011

  52. [52]

    G. Y. Guo, Q. Niu, and N. Nagaosa, Anomalous nernst and hall effects in magnetized platinum and palladium, Phys. Rev. B89, 214406 (2014)

    work page 2014

  53. [53]

    M. Roig, Y. Yu, R. C. Ekman, A. Kreisel, B. M. Ander- sen, and D. F. Agterberg, Quasisymmetry-constrained spin ferromagnetism in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 016703 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    M. Roig, A. Kreisel, Y. Yu, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg, Minimal models for altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B110, 144412 (2024)

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    D. S. Antonenko, R. M. Fernandes, and J. W. Venderbos, Mirror chern bands and weyl nodal loops in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 096703 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. ˇSmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty,et al., Direct observation of altermagnetic band splitting in crsb thin films, Nat. Commun.15, 2116 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    J. Ding, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Tao, Z. Liu, T. Li, J. Liu, J. Sun, J. Cheng, J. Liu,et al., Large band splitting in g-wave altermagnet crsb, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    G. Yang, Z. Li, S. Yang, J. Li, H. Zheng, W. Zhu, Z. Pan, Y. Xu, S. Cao, W. Zhao,et al., Three-dimensional map- ping of the altermagnetic spin splitting in crsb, Nat. Commun.16, 1442 (2025)

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    Z. Zhou, X. Cheng, M. Hu, R. Chu, H. Bai, L. Han, J. Liu, F. Pan, and C. Song, Manipulation of the alter- magnetic order in crsb via crystal symmetry, Nature638, 645 (2025)

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei, Y.-J. Sun, Y. Huang, X. Zheng, Y. Peng, L. He, S. Li, J. Luo, Z. Li, G. Chen, H. Li, H. Weng, and T. Qian, A metallic room-temperature d- wave altermagnet, Nat. Phys.21, 754 (2025)

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    Zhang, X

    F. Zhang, X. Cheng, Z. Yin, C. Liu, L. Deng, Y. Qiao, Z. Shi, S. Zhang, J. Lin, Z. Liu, M. Ye, Y. Huang, X. Meng, C. Zhang, T. Okuda, K. Shimada, S. Cui, Y. Zhao, G.-H. Cao, S. Qiao, J. Liu, and C. Chen, Crystal-symmetry-paired spin–valley locking in a layered room-temperature metallic altermagnet candidate, Nat. Phys.21, 760 (2025)

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, J. Zub´ aˇ c, R. Gonzalez- Hernandez, K. Geishendorf, Z. ˇSob´ aˇ n, G. Springholz, K. Olejn´ ık, L.ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, S. T. B. Goennenwein, A. Thomas, H. Reichlov´ a, J.ˇZelezn´ y, and D. Kriegner, Spontaneous anomalous hall effect arising from an unconventional compensated magnetic phase in a semiconductor, Phy...

    work page 2023

  63. [63]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. ˇSmejkal,et al., Broken kramers degeneracy in altermagnetic mnte, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Krempask` y, L

    J. Krempask` y, L. ˇSmejkal, S. D’souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhl´ ıˇ rov´ a, F. Alarab, P. Constantinou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov,et al., Altermagnetic lifting of kramers spin degeneracy, Nature626, 517 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    Osumi, S

    T. Osumi, S. Souma, T. Aoyama, K. Yamauchi, A. Honma, K. Nakayama, T. Takahashi, K. Ohgushi, and T. Sato, Observation of a giant band splitting in alter- magnetic mnte, Phys. Rev. B109, 115102 (2024)

    work page 2024

  66. [66]

    I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, and L.ˇSmejkal, Prediction of unconventional magnetism in doped fesb2, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2108924118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  67. [67]

    Attias, A

    L. Attias, A. Levchenko, and M. Khodas, Intrinsic anomalous hall effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B110, 094425 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    Phillips, G

    C. Phillips, G. Pokharel, K. Shtefiienko, S. R. Bhan- dari, D. E. Graf, D. Rai, and K. Shrestha, Electronic structure of the altermagnet candidate fesb 2: High-field torque magnetometry and density functional theory stud- ies, Phys. Rev. B111, 075141 (2025)

    work page 2025

  69. [69]

    L. Han, X. Fu, R. Peng, X. Cheng, J. Dai, L. Liu, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, W. Zhu, H. Bai,et al., Electrical 180 switching of n´ eel vector in spin-splitting antiferromagnet, Sci. Adv. 10, eadn0479 (2024)

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    Reichlova, R

    H. Reichlova, R. Lopes Seeger, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, I. Kounta, R. Schlitz, D. Kriegner, P. Ritzinger, M. Lam- mel, M. Leivisk¨ a, A. Birk Hellenes,et al., Observation of a spontaneous anomalous hall response in the mn5si3 d-wave altermagnet candidate, Nat. Commun,15, 4961 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    Badura, W

    A. Badura, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, I. Kounta, L. Michez, M. Petit, J. Rial, M. Leivisk¨ a, V. Baltz, F. Krizek,et al., Observation of the anomalous nernst effect in altermagnetic candidate mn5si3, Nat. Commun, 16, 7111 (2025)

    work page 2025

  72. [72]

    Onoda, N

    S. Onoda, N. Sugimoto, and N. Nagaosa, Quantum trans- port theory of anomalous electric, thermoelectric, and thermal hall effects in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B77, 165103 (2008)

    work page 2008

  73. [73]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1539 (2010)

    work page 2010

  74. [74]

    S. Sun, Z. Song, H. Weng, and X. Dai, Topological metals induced by the zeeman effect, Phys. Rev. B101, 125118 (2020)

    work page 2020

  75. [75]

    T. P. Cysne, S. Bhowal, G. Vignale, and T. G. Rap- poport, Orbital hall effect in bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides: From the intra-atomic approximation to the bloch states orbital magnetic moment approach, Phys. Rev. B105, 195421 (2022)

    work page 2022

  76. [76]

    G¨ obel and I

    B. G¨ obel and I. Mertig, Orbital hall effect accompanying quantum hall effect: Landau levels cause orbital polar- ized edge currents, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 146301 (2024)

    work page 2024